BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram showing the arrangement of a steering apparatus according to the first embodiment;
FIG. 2 is a block diagram showing the arrangement of a control unit according to the first embodiment;
FIG. 3 is a flowchart showing steering reaction force control processing according to the first embodiment;
FIGS. 4A to 4C show examples of the data structure of a human impedance calculation LUT according to the first embodiment;
FIG. 5 is a flowchart showing an example of the steering reaction force change processing according to the first embodiment;
FIG. 6 is a schematic diagram showing the arrangement of the steering apparatus according to a modification of the first embodiment;
FIG. 7 is a schematic diagram showing the arrangement of a steering apparatus according to the second embodiment;
FIG. 8 is a flowchart showing the steering reaction force control processing according to the second embodiment;
FIG. 9 is a flowchart showing a practical example of the processing for calculating a human impedance including a disturbance impedance according to the second embodiment;
FIGS. 10A to 10C are graphs showing examples of a measurement signal, steering angle sensor output, and steering torque sensor output according to the second embodiment;
FIG. 11 is a flowchart showing an example of the calculation sequence of a rigidity coefficient, viscosity coefficient, and inertia coefficient according to the second embodiment;
FIG. 12 is a view for explaining the calculation sequence of the rigidity coefficient, viscosity coefficient, and inertia coefficient according to the second embodiment;
FIGS. 13A to 13C are graphs for explaining the calculation sequence of the rigidity coefficient, viscosity coefficient, and inertia coefficient according to the second embodiment;
FIG. 14 is a flowchart showing a practical example of the processing for calculating disturbance impedance according to the second embodiment;
FIG. 15 is a flowchart showing a practical example of the processing for calculating human impedance free from the influence of any disturbance according to the second embodiment;
FIGS. 16A to 16C are graphs showing examples of a measurement signal, steering angle sensor, and steering torque sensor according to the fourth embodiment;
FIGS. 17A1 to 17C2 are graphs showing examples of a measurement signal, steering angle sensor, and steering torque sensor according to the fifth embodiment;
FIG. 18 is a graph showing an example of an envelope of the frequency spectrum of a steering angle sensor output signal according to the fifth embodiment;
FIGS. 19A to 19C are graphs showing examples of a measurement signal, steering angle sensor, and steering torque sensor according to the sixth embodiment;
FIG. 20 is a flowchart showing a practical example of the processing for calculating human impedance including disturbance impedance according to the seventh embodiment;
FIG. 21 is a flowchart showing a practical example of the processing for calculating human impedance including disturbance impedance according to the eighth embodiment;
FIGS. 22A and 22B are views for different steering behaviors depending on drivers;
FIG. 23 is a flowchart showing a practical example of the processing for calculating human impedance including a disturbance impedance according to the ninth embodiment; and
FIGS. 24A to 24F are graphs for explaining the processing for calculating human impedance including a disturbance impedance according to the ninth embodiment.