The invention relates generally to the field of steganography and, more particularly, to such steganography which integrally combines a visible colorant with an invisible colorant which invisible colorant is imperceptible to the human eye and which is not present in a reproduction therefrom for detecting counterfeiting, forgery or the like.
“I would never put it in the power of any printer or publisher to suppress or alter a work of mine, by making him master of the copy” Thomas Paine, Rights of Man, 1792.
“The printer dares not go beyond his licensed copy” Milton, Aeropagetica, 1644.
Since time immemorial, unauthorized use and outright piracy of proprietary source material has been a source of lost revenue, confusion, and artistic corruption.
These historical problems have been compounded by the advent of digital technology. With it, the technology of copying materials and redistributing them in unauthorized manners has reached new heights of sophistication, and more importantly, omnipresence. Lacking objective means for comparing an alleged copy of material with the original, owners and litigation proceedings are left with a subjective opinion of whether the alleged copy is stolen, or has been used in an unauthorized manner. Furthermore, there is no simple means of tracing a path to an original purchaser of the material—something which can be valuable in tracing where a possible “leak” of the material first occurred.
A variety of methods for protecting commercial material have been attempted. One method is to embed information in the document or image that is imperceptible to the human eye and which is copied into reproductions. The embedded information includes data that permits the copyright owner to discern copies from the original so that illegal copying is detected.
Although the presently known and utilized media having steganography and methods using steganography are satisfactory, they include drawbacks. One such drawback is that, upon copying the reproduced copy over and over again, the embedded data may become degraded so that the data is not decodable. Another drawback is that image processing, such as scaling, rotation and the like, may also degrade the embedded data so that it is not decodable. Another drawback is that exact copies of images containing steganographic data reproduce that information as well as the original so that copies cannot easily be distinguished from the original by the presence of the steganographic mark. While the presence of the steganographic mark authenticates the original as legitimate and prevents the creation of an altered copy of the original, it does not distinguish between an exact copy of the original and the original itself.
Consequently, a need exists for a form of embedded data which is not reproduced in photocopies so that all subsequent copies (i.e., those which do not contain the unreproducable embedded data) are identifiable as photocopies so that fraudulent photocopies are easily detected. It is noted that this is the inverse of the currently known embedded steganography which passes the embedded data to photocopies.
The present invention is directed to overcoming one or more of the problems set forth above. Briefly summarized, according to one aspect of the present invention, the a medium for displaying information thereon, the medium comprising (a) a substrate; (b) visible information formed from a plurality of colors displayed on the substrate; wherein at least one of the colors includes at least one visible colorant and at least one invisible colorant which invisible colorant is imperceptible to the human eye and which is not present in a reproduction therefrom for detecting counterfeiting or forgery.
These and other aspects, objects, features and advantages of the present invention will be more clearly understood and appreciated from a review of the following detailed description of the preferred embodiments and appended claims, and by reference to the accompanying drawings.
Advantageous Effect of the Invention
The present invention has the following advantages of detecting original copyrighted media by illuminating the media of interest with infrared light for detecting data which is imperceptible to the human eye and which is lost upon reproduction.
Referring to
One of the colorants, for example magenta, includes an invisible colorant 30 that is substantially non-reflective or luminesce in the visible wavelengths. Although magenta is used in the preferred embodiment, any one or any combination of the CMYK colorants 20 could include an invisible colorant.
The invisible colorant 30 is typically formed from an ultraviolet (UV) or infrared (IR) absorbing dye, pigment or ink. As used herein, UV is defined as a colorant having substantially all of its absorption at below 400 nanometers, and an IR dye, pigment or ink has substantially all of its absorption at or above 800 nanometers. The UV materials and the IR materials may be those as those described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,866,027 and 4,866,025 for UV and U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,950,640 and 4,942,141 for IR, but are not limited to those disclosures.
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
In contrast, a copy of the media processed on something such as a photocopier the photocopier will output an image without any invisible colorant. When the copied image is scanned and filtered by the reading device no light will pass through the filter thus detecting an illegal copy.
The invention has been described with reference to a preferred embodiment. However, it will be appreciated that variations and modifications can be effected by a person of ordinary skill in the art without departing from the scope of the invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3886083 | Laxer | May 1975 | A |
4866025 | Byers et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4866027 | Henzel | Sep 1989 | A |
4942141 | DeBoer et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4950640 | Evans et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
5586787 | Brown et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20030228980 A1 | Dec 2003 | US |