Patent Application
20210155902
The present invention relates to stem-cell derived hematopoietic cells, in particular, myeloid cells, preferably, macrophages, their generation and use. In particular, the invention relates to a method of producing hematopoietic, preferably, myeloid cells, comprising cultivating embryoid bodies, which are, e.g., derivable from pluripotent stem cells such as induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSC), in suspension culture, to produce myeloid cell forming complexes, which are further cultivated in suspension culture to produce myeloid cells such as macrophages, preferably, in a continuous manner. This allows for a scalable and continuous production, e.g., in industry-compatible stirred tank bioreactors. Macrophages, e.g., macrophages produced with this method that have unique characteristics, can be used in pharmaceutical compositions for treatment of patients, e.g., for treatment of infection such as bacterial infection. The invention further provides application systems suitable for spraying, comprising myeloid cells such as macrophages for use in treatment of patients for treatment of infection, e.g., bacterial infection or wound healing. Pharmaceutical compositions comprising shrunk cells with reduced size, for example, reduced volume, e.g., obtainable by contacting the cells with a hypertonic solution, are also provided, which are particularly useful for spraying applications, e.g., of macrophages, wherein the cells with reduced volume are administered into the lung.
The increasing number of severe infections with multi-drug-resistant pathogens worldwide highlights the need for alternative treatment options. The fact that the respective pathogens are often refractory not only to standard antibiotic therapy but even resistant against drugs of last resort creates a severe clinical problem. Thus, alternative strategies targeting bacterial infections are urgently required (Freire-Moran et al., 2011; Ventola, 2015; Willyard, 2017).
One promising alternative to antibiotic therapy might be a cell based treatment approach applying stem cell-derived immune cells, in particular phagocytes as an important component of the innate immune system. As of yet, however, generating the therapeutically required amounts of phagocytes from peripheral blood or other sources is challenging. In contrast to somatic cell sources and more specified adult hematopoietic stem cells, human pluripotent stem cells (hPSCs), with their unlimited potential for proliferation and differentiation, may—in principle—enable this therapeutic scenario. In this line, hematopoietic differentiation of human PSC has been proven feasible (Ackermann et al., 2015) and has been proposed as a promising strategy for future cell-based treatment approaches. However, clinical translation of hPSC-derived hematopoiesis remains hampered by insufficient knowledge about in vivo functionality and the lack of therapeutically relevant quantities of effector cells.
The inventors have recently shown that the potential of human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) and induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs) for unlimited proliferation and targeted differentiation is not only a theoretical feature, but can be put into practice by developing scalable and potentially GMP-compliant cell production processes in fully controlled stirred tank bioreactors (Kempf et al., 2015; Kropp et al., 2016a; Zweigerdt et al., 2011). While feasibility of the approach was demonstrated for hPSC expansion (Kropp et al., 2016b; Olmer et al., 2012) and cardiomyogenic differentiation in stirred suspension (Kempf et al., 2016; Kempf et al., 2015; Kempf et al., 2014), the successful use of bioreactor systems for generating hematopoietic cells from multipotent or pluripotent stem cell sources is yet elusive. Similar observations have been made for the in vivo applicability of PSC-derived hematopoietic cells. Although the generation of mature immune cells including phagocytes from human PSC has been proven (Buchrieser et al., 2017; Lachmann et al., 2015; van Wilgenburg et al., 2013; Zhang et al., 2015), data on their actual in vivo functionality remains as of yet scarce.
In light of the state of the art, the inventors addressed the problem of providing a method of producing hematopoietic, in particular, myeloid cells in large quantities, preferably, allowing for continuous production. This problem is solved by the present invention, in particular, by the subject matter of the claims.
The present invention thus provides a method of producing hematopoietic, in particular, myeloid cells, comprising steps of
Said method allows for continuous production, and, preferably, it is used for continuous production of myeloid cells.
Embryoid bodies (EBs) are three-dimensional aggregates derived from pluripotent stem cells (PSC), which are typically rounded and comprise cell types of all three germ layers. PSC are undifferentiated cells that can differentiate into specialized cells, in particular, they are capable of differentiation into cells of all three germ layers under suitable conditions. Pluripotent cell types from which embryoid bodies may be derived include embryonic stem cells (ESCs) derived from the blastocyst stage of embryos, e.g., from mouse (mESC), primate, and human (hESC) sources.
Additionally, EBs can be formed from PSC derived through alternative techniques, including somatic cell nuclear transfer or the reprogramming of somatic cells to yield induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSC). Methods for generating EBs are well known in the art.
In the context of the present invention, EBs are preferably not derived from stem cells for generation of which destruction of human embryos was required. Preferably, the EBs are derived from iPSC.
Similar to stem cells differentiated in monolayer formats, stem cells within embryoid bodies undergo differentiation and cell specification along the three germ lineages—endoderm, ectoderm, and mesoderm—which comprise all somatic cell types.
In contrast to monolayer differentiation cultures, however, the spheroid structures that are formed when PSCs aggregate enable the non-adherent culture of EBs in suspension. This makes EB cultures inherently scalable, which is useful for bioprocessing approaches, whereby large yields of cells can be produced for potential clinical applications. Additionally, although EBs largely exhibit heterogeneous patterns of differentiated cell types, they are capable of responding to similar cues as those that direct embryonic development.
As stem cells may undergo apoptosis when cultured as single cells, EB formation often necessitates the use of inhibitors of the rho associated kinase (ROCK) pathway, e.g., Y-27632, HA-100, H-1152 and/or 2.4 disubstituted thiazole (Thiazovivin/Tzv), preferably, Y-27632, e.g., about 10 μM. Alternatively, to avoid dissociation into single cells, EBs can be formed from PSCs such as hiPSCs by manual separation of adherent colonies (or regions of colonies) or, preferably, by enzymatic treatment with collagenase IV, and subsequently cultured in suspension. Formation of EBs in suspension allows for the formation of large quantities of EBs, but provides little control over the size of the resulting aggregates, often leading to large, irregularly shaped EBs. Mixed (or moved, e.g., stirred or shaken) culture platforms increase the homogeneity of EB sizes when ESCs are inoculated within bulk suspensions.
Preferably, the embryoid bodies of the invention are obtained by a method comprising cultivating pluripotent stem cells such as iPSC in suspension culture for a sufficient period of time to produce embryoid bodies. For therapeutic uses, in particular, for use in humans, use of feeder cells should be avoided. This can be compensated for by adding cytokines e.g. SCF, BMP4, VEGF or small molecules including WNT pathway modulators such as CHIR99021 ((6-[[2-[[4-(2,4-Dichlorophenyl)-5-(5-methyl-1H-imidazol-2-yl)-2-pyrimidinyl]amino]ethyl]amino]-3-pyridinecarbonitrile (TOCRIS)) and BIO ((2′Z,3′E)-6-Bromoindirubin-3′-oxime) (TOCRIS)). Preferably, the culture conditions include use of ROCK inhibitor, but addition of bFGF is not required.
Suitable embryoid bodies for use in the methods of the present invention can be selected manually, but, preferably, they are selected according to their sedimentation characteristics. For example, EBs which sediment (without centrifugation) within 10 min, preferably, within 5 min, may be used (WO2010/025776A1).
The pluripotent stem cells from which the EB are derived, and to which, consequently the produced myeloid cells belong, may be from any species, e.g., mouse, rat, rabbit, guinea pig, cat, horse, dog, cow, camel, pig, sheep, goat, monkey or primate, e.g., human. Human cells are preferred. In case the cells are intended for treatment of a human, human myeloid cells such as macrophages are preferably produced. In the method of the invention, preferably, cytokines from the relevant species are used. These may be recombinant cytokines, optionally, comprising mutations, which do not diminish their functionality in the differentiation processes involved.
The suspension culture of the invention prevents adhesion to surfaces, in particular to surfaces of containers. The suspension culture also does not allow adhesion to carriers. Preferably, the suspension culture is moved to prevent adherence or sedimentation of cells, e.g., shaken, rotated or stirred. The culture may take place in suspension plates, e.g., on an orbital shaker, or in roller bottles coated to prevent adhesion.
In a preferred embodiment, the suspension culture is carried out in a bioreactor allowing suspension culture such as an Erlenmeyer flask, spinner flask, stirred tank bioreactor, wave bioreactor and rotating wall bioreactor, preferentially in a stirred tank bioreactor, most preferably in an instrumented stirred tank bioreactor, i.e., a bioreactor equipped with technologies to monitor and control process parameters such as pH, pO2, temperature and stirring speed. Such systems are scalable, i.e., the volume of the culture can be changed without significantly changing culture conditions. The DASbox Mini bioreactor system, Eppendorf may be used, e.g., as described below.
For compatibility with industrial processes, relative linear upscaling is probably the most important criteria. Preferred systems may already be utilized in the industry for other purposes, and may fulfil industry standards, e.g. they may be equipped with standard ports that allow incorporation of standard probes for process monitoring and control, and established sterilization and equipment validation procedures. Bioreactors may be GMP-compatible.
Bioreactors used in the invention, e.g., stirred tank bioreactors, may be equipped with ports enabling continuous sampling, monitoring and harvest of cells, in particular monocytes and macrophages. They may also be equipped with suitable cell retention systems allowing perfusion-based cell feeding and online monitoring of culture medium components such as metabolites e.g. glucose, lactate and ammonium. The bioreactor may be a single-use (disposable) or reusable bioreactor, utilising glass, plastic or stainless steel vessels.
Preferably, the cultivation in a stirred tank bioreactor is carried out at about 37° C., with headspace gassing at about 3 L/h with about 21% O2, about 5% CO2, and stirring at about 50 revolutions per minute using a multiple blade (e.g., 4-12 blade)-pitched impeller. In the context of the invention, “about” means+/−10%, preferably, +/−5% or +/−2%.
The cultivation may be at 37° C., with headspace gassing at 3 L/h with 21% O2, 5% CO2, and stirring at 50 revolutions per minute using an 8 blade-pitched 60° C. impeller and, optionally, with real-time monitoring of dissolved oxygen, pH, temperature, and impedance-based biomass assessment.
Preferably, the method of the invention allows for continuous production of myeloid cells, which includes repeated batch methods. Continuous production strictu sensu is also possible, and may allow for more efficacious cell production. For example, a cell retention system enabling perfusion may be used in combination with continuous medium replacement to optimize culture conditions.
The volume of the suspension culture, e.g., in the stirred tank bioreactor, is scalable, e.g., 50 mL-1000 L, 100 mL-500 L, 200 mL-100 L, 500 mL to 50 L or 1 L-20 L. Preferably, in particular for therapeutic application of the produced cells, the medium used for cultivation is a chemically defined medium compatible with application in humans, e.g., X-VIVO 15 (Lonza) or APEL (Stem Cell Technologies), preferably, X-VIVO 15. E850 or E6 media (Stem Cell Technologies) preferably, supplemented with ROCK-inhibitor, may also be used for the suspension culture of step a. Myeloid cell forming complexes (MCFC) are known in the art (Lachmann et al., 2015). They contain CD34+ clonogenic progenitor cells. They are capable of continuously producing myeloid cells. In the presence of IL-3, myeloid cells are delivered into the culture medium. Of note, the method of the present invention does not require any purification of MCFC, it just requires that MCFC are formed in step a) and that they produce myeloid cells in step b). Step a) and b) (and, optionally, even c)) can overlap, i.e., it is possible that further EB differentiate into MCFC while other MCFC already produce myeloid cells (which may already be isolated).
Generation of MCFC from EBs typically takes about 4-8 days. Generation of first myeloid cells from MCFC starts after formation of the MCFC, and continuous generation is observed thereafter. Typically, harvest is started about 3-16 days after generation of MCFC. A suitable time for production of MCFC from EB and production of myeloid cells together (i.e., step a) and step b) together) is at least about 7 days, e.g., 7-20 days. The inventors could show that, from day 7-14 onwards, at least weekly harvest of macrophages from a stirred bioreactor system is possible, showing an increasing yield over time. In a 250 mL bioreactor (120 mL culture volume), stable production of about 2-3×107 macrophages/week is possible as early as week three, which can be maintained over time for at least 5 weeks. Of course, cultivation times and conditions may be varied depending on the phenotype of the desired cells. For example, harvesting continuously or in in small intervals may lead to production of less mature cells. The harvested cells can than, optionally, as discussed later below, be subject to further maturation.
Culture in the presence of a cytokine such as IL-3 does not necessitate continuous presence of said cytokine. It is for example possible to culture the cells in the absence of IL-3 for time periods, but differentiation and, in particular, production of myeloid cells by MCFC requires presence of IL-3. Suitable amounts or IL-3 are, e.g., 10-100 ng/mL, preferably, 20-30 ng/mL (most preferably, about 25 ng/ml) IL-3.
For formation of MCFC, differentiation medium I may be used, e.g., a basic medium, preferably, a chemically defined medium such as X-VIVO 15 (Lonza) or APEL (Stem Cell Technologies), both suitable, e.g., for human cells, X-VIVO 15 is preferred further comprising suitable amounts, e.g., 10-100 ng/mL, preferably, 20-30 ng/mL (most preferably, about 25 ng/ml) IL-3 (obtainable, e.g., from PeproTech) and, optionally, at least one other cytokine, e.g., 40-60 ng/ml (preferably, about 50 ng/ml) M-CSF (obtainable, e.g., from PeproTech), if macrophages are to be produced. The medium may optionally comprise suitable amounts of antibiotics, e.g., 1% penicillin-streptomycin.
If the produced cells are not for use in humans, other basic media may be used, e.g., for mouse cells, RPMI1640 supplemented with 10% FCS, 2 mM L-glutamine, optionally, 1% penicillin-streptomycin and at least one cytokine.
For production of myeloid cells having a mature phenotype, additional cytokines may be added at least in step b), optionally, also in step a) of the method of the invention.
In a preferred method of the invention, the additional cytokine is M-CSF (in a suitable concentration, e.g., 40-60 ng/mL, preferably, about 50 ng/mL M-CSF), and the produced myeloid cells are macrophages.
Alternatively, the additional cytokine is G-CSF (in a suitable concentration, e.g., 40-60 ng/mL, preferably, about 50 ng/mL G-CSF) and the produced myeloid cells are granulocytic precursor, which can be further differentiated towards granulocytes upon culture in G-CSF only (in a suitable concentration, e.g., 50-200 ng/mL, preferably, about 100 ng/mL G-CSF).
Alternatively, the additional cytokine is GM-CSF (in a suitable concentration, e.g., 40-60 ng/mL, preferably, about 50 ng/mL GM-CSF) and the produced myeloid cells are macrophages and granulocytic precursor, which can be further differentiated towards granulocytes upon culture in GM-CSF only (in a suitable concentration, e.g., 50-200 ng/mL, preferably, about 100 ng/mL GM-CSF).
If the additional cytokines are SCF and EPO (in suitable concentrations, e.g., 80-120 ng/mL, preferably, about 100 ng/mL SCF and 2-4 Units (U), preferably, about 3 U EPO), the produced myeloid cells comprise erythroid cells, which can be further differentiated upon culture in SCF and EPO only (in a suitable concentration, e.g., 50-200 ng/mL SCF, preferably, about 100 ng/mL SCF, and 2-4 Units (U) EPO, preferably, about 3 U EPO).
Other lineage-instructive cytokines may be applied to further broaden the spectrum of generated cell types towards dendritic cells or thrombocytes (Ackermann et al., 2015; Choi et al., 2009; Lachmann et al., 2015; Ma et al., 2008).
Alternatively, the additional cytokines are IL-4 and GM-CSF (in a suitable concentration, e.g., 40-60 ng/mL, preferably, about 50 ng/mL GM-CSF and IL-4) and the produced myeloid cells comprise dendritic cells, which can be further differentiated upon culture in GM-CSF/IL4 only (in a suitable concentration, e.g., 50-200 ng/mL, preferably, about 100 ng/mL GM-CSF/IL4).
Optionally, the additional cytokines are SCF and TPO (in suitable concentrations, e.g., 80-120 ng/mL, preferably, about 100 ng/mL SCF and 2-4U, preferably, about 3 U TPO) and the produced myeloid cells comprise megakaryocytes and/or thrombocytes, which can be further differentiated upon culture in SCF/TPO only (in a suitable concentration, e.g., 50-200 ng/mL SCF, preferably, about 100 ng/mL SCF, and 2-4 Units (U) TPO, preferably, about 3 U TPO). Since IL-3 might exert a negative effect on the maturation of megakaryocytes, it might be reduced or omitted after step a).
In one embodiment of the method of the invention, no cytokine additional to IL-3 is added in either step a) or step b), and the produced myeloid cells are immature myeloid cells capable of further differentiation. Optionally, in said case, said method further comprises
Good results with GMP-compliant media have been seen using ROCK-Inhibitor supplemented E8 media (Stem Cell Technologies) containing 5-200 ng/mL, preferably 50 ng/ml bFGF, for cultivation of single iPSC as a monolayer preceeding the suspension culture, with ROCK-Inhibitor supplemented E850 or E6 media (Stem Cell Technologies) for suspension culture, and with X-VIVO15 media for hematopoietic differentiation supplemented with appropriate cytokines, e.g., 50 ng/ml hVEGF, 50 ng/ml hBMP4 and 20 ng/ml hSCF which, may be followed later (e.g., at day 4 of mesoderm priming) by addition of 25 ng/ml of IL-3. Subsequent hematopoietic differentiation of primed aggregates, e.g., for macrophage production, may be pursued by changing the media to 3 ml of 25 ng/ml IL-3 and 50 ng/ml M-CSF supplemented X-VIVO15.
In the method of the invention, isolating the produced myeloid cells comprises purifying the produced myeloid cells, preferably, the macrophages, to a purity of at least 50% or, preferably, at least 70%, at least 80%, at least 90% or at least 95%. If the method of the invention is carried out to produce macrophages, in particular, with culture in the presence of IL-3 and M-CSF, the purity of myeloid precursor cells characterized by an expression profile of CD45+CD11b+CD34−TRA-1-60− may be, preferably, at least 80%, at least 90% or at least 95%. At least 50%, preferably, at least 60%, or 70-90% of the produced cells are CD45+CD11b+CD34−TRA-1-60−CD14+/CD163+ macrophages. In one embodiment, at least 95% of the produced cells are CD45+CD11b+CD34−TRA-1-60−and 70-90% of the produced cells are CD45+CD11b+CD34−TRA-1-60−CD14+/CD163+. Most of the other cells are myeloid precursors of macrophages. If the isolation is continuous or the harvests are performed in shorter intervals, the percentage of precursors may be higher.
In the method of the invention, isolating the produced myeloid cells (e.g., macrophages) may comprise, e.g., in a batch-continuous method,
ci) allowing for sedimentation of majority of the MCFC in the suspension culture, e.g., by sedimentation for about 5-12 minutes, preferably, 10 minutes (e.g., by temporarily stopping movement (e.g., stirring) of the suspension culture,
cii) removing the supernatant,
ciii) filtering the removed supernatant through a filter with a mesh of about 70-100 μm,
civ) optionally, returning the retentate (which mostly comprises MCFC) to the suspension culture, and adding new culture medium to the sedimented cells of the suspension culture,
cv) wherein the produced myeloid cells are comprised in the filtrate. Optionally, the produced myeloid cells are isolated from the filtrate by sedimentation or centrifugation. They may then be formulated for administration to a patient, e.g., be taken up in a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier, e.g., a buffer such as PBS. Alternatively, they may be further cultivated, e.g., in suspension culture, e.g. in the presence of an activating and/or maturating agent selected form the group comprising a cytokine or active agent, e.g., IL-3, M-CSF, GM-CSF, TNF-alpha, IFN-gamma or LPS, and be formulated for administration later.
Alternatively, for isolation, the medium from the suspension culture may be removed through a filter having a mesh of about 70-100 μm, wherein the produced macrophages can be isolated, e.g., by centrifugation, from the filtrate, and, optionally, formulated for administration with or without further maturation. This isolation procedure may be performed from time to time, allowing for a batch continuous production of produced cells, or continuously.
Further alternative methods for isolation of the produced myeloid cells comprise differential centrifugation or gradient centrifugation, e.g., with a sucrose gradient.
The method of the invention optionally further comprises, after step c,
Each of these steps—or both—are typically carried out after isolation and/or purification of the myeloid cells such as macrophages, granulocytes, megakaryocytes, thrombocytes or dendritic cells. Preferably, the myeloid cells are macrophages.
In the context of the invention, reducing the size of cells by a method comprising contacting the cells, e.g., the myeloid cells, with a hypertonic solution means that the cells, typically, substantially isolated from buffer and/or cell culture media are contacted with a solution comprising e.g., a hypertonic sugar solution (preferably comprising sucrose) with more than 300 mosm, e.g., 310-1000 mosm, preferably, 350-800 mosm or 400-600 mosm, so that the volume of the cells is reduced. With myeloid cells, the average size (e.g., the average volume) is typically reduced by at least 10%, preferably, by at least 20%, at least 30%, at least 40%, at least 50%, at least 60% or at least 75%. The size, e.g., volume of the cells is preferably determined by FACS based on the forwards scatter (mean fluorescent intensity (MFI)) of the cells. Alternatively, the reduction in average diameter can be determined by microscopy and computational analysis e.g. with ImageJ. Preferably, macrophages of reduced size according to the invention have an average diameter of less than 15 μm, less than 13 μm, les than 12 μm, less than 10 μm, preferably, less than 8 μm, less than 6 μm or less than 4 μm (e.g., for human macrophages). For comparison, human alveolar macrophages not treated by the method of the invention have been found to have an average size of about 21 μm (Krombach et al., 1997. Environ Health Perspect. 105:1261-1263). Preferably, murine primary macrophages of reduced size according to the invention have an average mean diameter of less than less than 13 μm, less than 12 μm, less than 10 μm, preferably, less than 8 μm, less than 6 μm or less than 4 μm.
The contacting is carried out for a sufficient time to obtain the desired reduction in size, e.g., for 30 sec to 24 h, 1 min to 12 h, preferably, for 2 min to 1 h, 5 to 30 min, 10 to 20 min or for about 15 min. The required time depends on the cell types and the osmolarity of the solution used. The temperature is typically maintained at 4° C. to 37° C., e.g., at room temperature (20-25° C.), preferably, 37° C. The viability of the majority of cells, or, preferably at least 80% of the cells is maintained. Contacting with a hypertonic solution is a preferred method of reducing the size of cells in the contact of the invention. Alternatively, the size of the cells may be reduced, e.g., by lyophilisation or manipulation of the cytossceleton. Methods for reducing the size of the cells while maintaining viability of the majority of the cells, e.g., by lyophilisation, are known in the art. The inventors surprisingly found that cells temporarily reduced in size, e.g., myeloid cells such as macrophages, are functional, and may be used in pharmaceutical compositions.
Such pharmaceutical compositions may be freshly prepared, or may be stored as long as the majority of cells is viable, preferably at least 80% of the cells. Storage of cells in contact with a hypertonic solution may be, e.g., for up to 48 h, up to 24 h or over night. Alternatively, the cells maybe stored in isotonic solution at 4° C. for up to 12 h, up to 24, or up to 48 h, and incubated with the hypertonic solution before application.
Kits for storage of the cells, e.g., myeloid cells, in particular, the macophages of the present invention, and reducing the size thereof are also provided herewith, e.g., two chamber systems, one chamber comprising the cells in isotonic solution, and one chamber comprising a hypertonic solution, wherein mixing of the two solutions leads to the cells being contacted with a hypertonic solution as defined herein, wherein, consequently, the size of the cells is reduced. Sterility of the cells in the kit may be easily preserved. Preferably, this kit can be linked to a device suitable for spraying the cells, or it is a part of a device for spraying the cells.
Cells reduced in size by lyophilisation may be stored at appropriately low temperatures for longer periods of time than cells in hypertonic solution. Lyophilized cells may be administered directly or after taking them up in a hypertonic solution. For example, macrophages of reduced size were found to be active in phagocytosis of particles or bacteria, e.g., S. aureus. A reduced size leads to a deeper penetration into the airways, and to a better distribution of cells in the lower respiratory tract. The inventors could show in experiments with tissue explanted from rats that shrunk macrophages of the invention could be administered into the alveolar space by spraying. Cells of reduced size are thus particularly suitable for spraying, e.g., into the airways, or for other applications were a reduced size can lead to better penetration or distribution, e.g., for in vitro disinfection applications or for coating of devices for transplantation.
Preferably, simultaneously with the contacting with the hypertonic solution, the cells, e.g., macrophages, can be loaded with an agent, which may be a therapeutic agent or a diagnostic agent, preferably, a therapeutic agent. Of course, a combination of more than one agent may also be used. The agent may be exogenous agent. An exogenous agent is normally not found in the cells used in the invention in significant quantities, and typically is not derived and, optionally, not derivable from human cells. Exemplary agents are an antibiotic agent or an immunomodulating agent.
In the context of treatment of bacterial infections, loading with antibiotic agents is particularly useful. Examples for antibiotic agents are macrolid antibiotics such as azithromycin, clarithromycin, erythromycin, beta-lactam antibiotics such as cephalosporin, amoxicillin, methicillin, penicillin, or flucloxacillin, clindamycin, or fluorochinolone such as levofloxacin, moxifloxacin, doxycyclin or telithromycin, clavulanic acid, rifampicin or gentamycin or glycopeptid antibiotics such as vancomycin or teicoplanin, preferable lipophilic antibiotics. The selection depends on the indication, in particular, on the bacteria responsible for an infection which may be treated. Immunomodulating agents, e.g., cytokines, chemokines or agents capable of activating or inhibiting cells of the immune system such as corticosteroids may also be used, e.g., in case of inflammation. Bronchospasmolytics loaded into the cells can help to dilate the airways, which may enable deeper penetration of a second dose of cells administered when the first dose takes effect. Secretolytics can also be loaded into the cells, which may be particularly useful, e.g., for use in treatment of cystic fibrosis.
Dyes loaded on cells, in particular on cells with a reduced size, can be advantageous for confirming the penetration of cells, as a tracer or for diagnostic applications. Exemplary dyes are fluorescent dyes, e.g., Dil.
Loading of cells can also be performed before or without contacting the cells with a hypertonic solution. For application of cells where a reduced size does not play a great role, e.g., for application on predominantly planar areas, for example, on wounds, typically, the size of the cells is not modified.
Of course, loading of the cells with an agent is not required for application, as macrophages themselves may already be effective.
The invention provides a suspension culture comprising myeloid cell forming complexes which continuously produce hematopoietic cells, and, optionally, myeloid cells. Said suspension culture is, e.g., obtainable from the method of the invention above, wherein isolation of the produced myeloid cells is possible, but not required. Said suspension culture preferably is contained in a stirred tank bioreactor, e.g., as described above. In other words, the invention provides a stirred tank bioreactor comprising a suspension culture comprising myeloid cell forming complexes which continuously produce myeloid cells, and, optionally, myeloid cells. Preferably, said myeloid cells are macrophages, and the culture medium comprises IL-3 and M-CSF.
The present invention also provides a hematopoietic, preferably, a myeloid cell population obtainable by the method of the invention.
In an optional embodiment, the size of said myeloid cells, e.g., macrophages, has been reduced by a method selected from the group comprising contacting the cells with a hypertonic solution and lyophilisation. Optionally, the cells are further loaded with a therapeutic or diagnostic agent, as described above, e.g., an antibiotic agent, an immunomodulating agent and a dye. The invention thus provides a population of myeloid cells wherein the size of the cells is reduced in comparison to a corresponding cell cultured under physiologic conditions (in particular, a cell not contacted in an isotonic solution). With myeloid cells, the average volume is typically reduced by at least 10%, preferably, by at least 20%, at least 30%, at least 40%, at least 50% or at least 60%. The size or volume of the cells is preferably determined by FACS based on the forwards scatter of the cells. Preferably, macrophages of reduced size according to the invention have an average diameter of less than 10 μm, preferably, less than 8 μm, less than 6 μm or less than 4 μm. These cells may further comprise a therapeutic or diagnostic agent, preferably, a therapeutic agent. The cell population may e.g., comprise comprising more than 1×106 macrophages, at least 2×107 macrophages, at least 5×107 macrophages, at least 1×108 macrophages, at least 1×109 macrophages or at least 1×1010 macrophages. The cells having a reduced size may have any of the marker profiles described below.
The cells obtainable by the method of the invention may also have a non-modified size, e.g., if they have not been contacted by a hypertonic solution.
The invention e.g., provides a cell population comprising CD45+CD11b+CD14+CD163+CD34−TRA1-60− macrophages, preferably, at least 50%, at least 60%, or at least 70% of said cells, which is, e.g., obtainable by the method of the invention. Analysis of expression of genes associated with pluripotency and activation of innate immune response confirmed efficient differentiation of iPSC into macrophage-like cells. Importantly, genes associated with macrophage function such as the toll-like receptors (TLR) 1 and 4, CD14, or components of the NF-κB signaling pathway (gene ontology (GO) Activation of innate immunity: 0002218) were significantly upregulated in iPSC-MACs and PBMC-MACs versus iPSCs. Morphological analysis after adherence and functional analysis (e.g., phagocytic uptake of latex beads and bacteria) confirm that the generated cells are macrophages. The methods of the invention for the first time render it possible to produce a cell population comprising more than 1×106 macrophages, at least 2×107 macrophages, at least 5×107 macrophages, at least 1×108 macrophages, at least 1×109 macrophages or at least 1×1010 macrophages.
The macrophages obtainable from the method of the invention typically have a significantly higher surface expression (as determined by FACS) of CD14 and C163 and a significantly lower surface expression of HLA than macrophages obtained from PBMC. The macrophages produced in the examples were shown to produce pro-inflammatory cytokines such as IL-6, IL-8, or TNF-alpha. Accordingly, they can be considered be more pro-inflammatory macrophages than anti-inflammatory macrophages. By addition of suitable cytokines e.g. IL-13, IL-10, IL-4, the phenotype can be redirected to anti-inflammatory macrophages. In addition, other substances, e.g. corticosteroide, may be used to induce an anti-inflammatory phenotype.
The inventors have found that the CD45+CD11b+CD14+CD163+CD34−TRA1-60− macrophages of the invention, e.g., obtainable from the method of the invention, have a unique expression profile compared to macrophages isolated according to state of the art methods. Preferably, in the macrophages of the invention, expression of at least 10 genes selected from a group consisting of DKK1, SEPP1, PITX2, COL3A1, KRT19, A 33_P3221980, CALD1, CYR61, H19, DDIT4L, FRZB, TMEM98, NNMT, NPNT, LUM, DCN, LYVE1, MGP, IGFBP3 and NUAK1 is at least 20 fold upregulated in said macrophages compared to macrophages derived from PBMC, preferably, at least 50 fold, at least 200 fold, at least 400 fold or at least 1000 fold. Expression of at least 12 genes, preferably, at least 15 genes or all genes selected from a group consisting of DKK1, SEPP1, PITX2, COL3A1, KRT19, A 33_P3221980, CALD1, CYR61, H19, DDIT4L, FRZB, TMEM98, NNMT, NPNT, LUM, DCN, LYVE1, MGP, IGFBP3 and NUAK1 may be at least 100 fold upregulated in said macrophages compared to macrophages derived from PBMC, preferably, at least 200 fold, at least 400 fold or at least 500 fold. Optionally, expression of CYR61, DDIT4L, KRT19, DCN, LUM, COL3A1 is at least 200 fold, at least 500 fold or at least 1000 fold upregulated in said macrophages compared to macrophages derived from PBMC.
Optionally, furthermore, in the macrophages of the invention, expression of at least 10 genes selected from a group consisting of ANPEP, CDA, CRTAM, ENST00000390237, FBP1, GBP1, GNLY, HLA_DQA1, HLA_DQA2, HLA_DQB1, HLA_DQB2, HLA_DRA, HLA_DRB1, HLA_DRB3, HLA_DRB4, HLA_DRB5, IL15, LY75, S1PR4, TNFAIP6 are at least 20 fold downregulated in said macrophages compared to macrophages derived from PBMC, preferably, at least 200 fold, at least 400 fold, at least 500 fold or at least 1000 fold. Expression of at least 10, at least 12 or all genes selected from said group may be at least 100 fold downregulated in said macrophages compared to macrophages derived from PBMC, preferably, at least 200 fold, at least 400 fold, at least 500 fold or at least 1000 fold.
Typical expression profiles are disclosed herein, e.g., in Table 1. It is noted that the comparison leads to particularly high differences for genes which are practically not expressed in one of the cell types compared. In that case, even very small differences in expression of the genes can lead to high differences in the comparative rate of expression. Without intending to be limited by the theory, it is believed that the shear stress in suspension culture leads to different expression of genes in the produced myeloid cells.
The invention also provides a cell population comprising at least 50%, preferably, at least 60% or at least 70% of immature CD45+CD11b+/CD14−/CD163− myeloid cells, wherein, optionally, said cell population is obtainable by the method of the invention. Said immature cells are unique due to their expression profile of CD45+CD11b+CD14−/CD163−/CD66b−/CD34dim/−.
The invention also provides a cell population comprising at least 50%, preferably, at least 60% or at least 70% of granulocytes, wherein, optionally, said cell population is obtainable by the method of the invention. Said granulocytes are unique due to their expression profile, e.g., they express significantly less CD66b on their surface than granulocytes isolated form PBMC. Said granulocytic cells are unique due to their expression profile of CD45+CD11b+CD66bthm, CD16dim.
The invention also provides a cell population comprising at least 50%, preferably, at least 60% or at least 70% of erythroid cells, wherein, said cell population is obtainable by the method of the invention. Said cells appear to be erythrocyte precursors.
The invention also provides a cell population comprising at least 10%, preferably, at least 20% or at least 30% of megakaryocytes, wherein, said cell population is obtainable by the method of the invention.
The invention also provides a cell population comprising at least 10%, preferably, at least 15% or at least 20% of dendritic cells, wherein, said cell population is obtainable by the method of the invention.
Such cell population may be frozen, e.g., according to methods known in the art. They are typically thawed before use. Populations isolated, e.g., from different batches from one or more cultures at one or more time points can be combined if higher cell numbers are needed. Of particular importance could be the differentiation with only IL3 to generate a myeloid progenitor population, which can be frozen, combined with subsequent on demand differentiation towards therapeutic cell types of choice.
The present invention also provides a pharmaceutical composition comprising a cell population of the invention, preferably, a cell population comprising macrophages or immature myeloid cells of the invention, most preferably, macrophages as characterized herein, in a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier. The cell population may be obtainable from the methods of the invention as described herein.
Preferably, the cells are human cells intended for treatment of a human patient, most preferably human macrophages or immature myeloid cells of the invention, most preferably, macrophages as characterized herein.
A pharmaceutically acceptable carrier typically is a buffer, e.g., PBS (PBS/EDTA supplemented with about 20% human serum albumin, or citrate plasma, or Plasmalyte-A pH 7.4 (Baxter, supplemented with about 2% human albumin). It is compatible with survival of the cells. It may comprise physiological levels of NaCl.
In a further embodiment, the present invention provides a pharmaceutical composition comprising a cell population in a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier, wherein the average size of the cells of the population is reduced, e.g., by at least 5%, by at least 10%, by at least 20%, at least 30%, at least 40%, at least 50% or at least 60% compared to a population of said cells in a physiologic saline solution. Said cell population may be a population of myeloid cells as described herein, e.g., immature myeloid cells, macrophages, dendritic cells, granulocytes such as neutrophils, thrombocytes, megacaryocytes or erythroid calls, preferably, macrophages or immature myeloid cells of the invention as characterized herein.
A pharmaceutically acceptable carrier in the context of a pharmaceutical composition comprising a cell population wherein the average size of the cells of the population is reduced is a hypertonic solution, e.g., comprising sugar and/or salts. The pharmaceutical composition of the invention, which, in one embodiment comprises macrophages with a non-modified size, may be comprised in a container suitable for spraying the pharmaceutical composition, e.g., with an atomizer.
In another embodiment, the pharmaceutical composition of the invention comprises macrophages with a reduced size as described herein, and is comprised in a container suitable for spraying the pharmaceutical composition, e.g., with an atomizer.
The present invention thus also provides an application system (e.g., in the form of a kit) comprising
Preferably, said macrophages are macrophages obtainable with the method of the invention, e.g., having the characteristics described herein. However, myeloid cells, in particular macrophages generated by other methods can also be employed in the application system of the invention, e.g., for the treatment as described herein.
In one embodiment, the myeloid cells of the application system are myeloid cells, e.g., macrophages which do not have a modified size, which may express the markers as described herein. They may be obtained by the method of the invention.
In a second embodiment, the myeloid cells of the application system are myeloid cells, e.g., macrophages, having a reduced size. For example, the size of the myeloid cells may have been reduced by a method selected from the group comprising contacting the cells with an hypertonic solution and lyophilisation. Said cells preferably express the markers as described herein. They may be obtained by the method of the invention. In a third embodiment, the myeloid cells of the application system are myeloid cells, e.g., macrophages, comprising a therapeutic or diagnostic agent selected from the group comprising an antibiotic agent, an immunomodulating agent and a dye, wherein the agent may be exogenous to the cell. It may be loaded into the cell as described herein. Optionally, the cells have a reduced size, as described herein, and they further preferably express the markers typical for cells obtained by the method of the present invention.
Suitable containers are known in the art, e.g., from EP2743343A1. For example, RenovaCare's Skin Gun may be used (RenovaCare), which is capable of spraying a liquid suspension of cells, e.g., onto wounds. A gentle positive-pressure air stream may be used to spray the cell suspension. Such application systems are particularly useful for spraying the cell population of the invention, e.g., comprising macrophages, on surfaces, e.g., on wounds such as burns and/or infected wounds. They are also useful for treatment in the lung. They may also be used for treatment of a surface in vitro, e.g., for disinfection or for reducing the number of pathogens, in particular, for reducing the number of bacteria on said surface.
The cells obtainable from the method of the invention may alternatively be administered with a bronchoscope or they may be administered to intubated patients.
The invention also provides a pharmaceutical composition or the application system of the invention, preferably, comprising macrophages such as the macrophages obtainable by the method of the invention, for use in treating or preventing an infection in a patient, e.g., a human patient.
The inventors found that the cells of the invention may be advantageously used as a cell therapeutic for treatment of different tissues or organs, e.g., brain, lung, skin, gut, peritoneum, liver, spleen or pancreas, in particular, for treatment of dysfunctions of macrophages in brain, lung, skin, gut, peritoneum, or liver. Macrophages genetically engineered to express a protein can also be used for therapy in other diseases, e.g., macrophages expressing insulin may be used for treatment of diabetes. Treatment of hereditary diseases involving lack or dysfunction of a protein can also be treated by administration of macrophages expressing said protein. Due to the relatively low turnover and tissue adaption of macrophages, a single administration can be effective for at least 1, 2 or 3 months or several years, optimally, life-long. If repeated treatment is needed at all, the intervals can accordingly be long, e.g., every 1, 2, 3, 6 months or every 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 10 or 20 years.
The inventors have shown that the pharmaceutical composition can advantageously be used for treatment or prevention of a bacterial infection, most preferably, for treatment of a bacterial infection. A bacterial infection may be, e.g., an infection with P. aeruginosa, S. pneumoniae, S. aureus, and M. tuberculosis. It may be a pulmonary infection. Treatment for pulmonary infections, e.g., with these bacteria, may be pulmonary e.g. by local cell administration via intubation. Alternatively, inhalation-based systems such as aerosol based sprays or systemic administration by i.v. injections may be applied. Local administration may be used. For inhalation systems, use of cells having a reduced size, as described herein, may be advantageous if a deep penetration into the airways is desired.
Bacterial pulmonary infections, e.g., with P. aeruginosa, are of particular relevance in patients such as cystic fibrosis patients. Patients for which the treatment or prevention may be of particular relevance are immunocompromised patients such as immunosuppressed patients, e.g., transplantation patients, patients in intensive care (e.g., with ventilation-associated pneumonia), newborn babies, elderly patients, patients suffering from chronic lung disease such as cystic fibrosis, CGD (or other genetic diseases leading to immunodeficiency), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or hPAP.
Treatment of a bacterial infection may also be treatment of sepsis. In this context, macrophages can not only serve to reduce bacterial load, but the can also serve as a sink for reducing the load of pro-inflammatory cytokines, cell- and bacterial-debris, and/or toxins (macrophage sponge).
Treatment or prevention of an infection can also be treatment of an infected wound or prevention of infection of a wound. In that case, topical administration, e.g., by spraying the wound with an administration device of the invention is useful. The wound may be cleaned, e.g., removing coagulated blood, to facilitate access before treatment. Treatment or prevention of an infection can also be peri- or post-operative treatment with a composition of the invention, e.g., by spraying the composition of the invention on an operation site during the operation or after closing the operation site.
The invention also provides a pharmaceutical composition or the application system of the invention, preferably, comprising macrophages, for use in promoting wound healing in a patient. A wound may, e.g., be a burn, in particular, a grade II or grade III burn. Promoting wound healing may or may not be in the context of infection. Macrophages do not only contribute to elimination of pathogens, but they also assist in remodelling tissue. These characteristics make the pharmaceutical composition of the invention useful for treatment, e.g., of ulcers or for removal of necrotic tissue. Further uses may be e.g., in promoting transplantation success or in treatment of paradontitis. The composition may also be used to prevent or minimize scar formation.
In the context of the invention, treatment means that at least one symptom of a disease is ameliorated. Preferably, in the context of a bacterial infection, the bacterial load is also reduced, and most preferably, all bacteria are eliminated.
Prevention means that the patient to be treated is not yet ill, i.e., does not show symptoms of the disease, and may be not infected (yet). Prevention reduces the likelihood of occurrence of a disease (in particular, an infection) and/or reduces the severity of symptoms of a disease.
Typically, the invention will be used in the context of treatment, but prevention can also be of interest, e.g., in the context of an outbreak of multiple-resistant bacteria and/or with patients, e.g, immunocompromised patients, likely to be in contact with such bacteria, e.g., in intensive care or in the context of solid organ transplantation or blood/bone marrow transfusion.
One particular advantage of the invention is that it can be used to treat or prevent a bacterial infection with bacteria resistant to at least one antibiotic agent, or with multi-resistant bacteria.
Alternatively, treatment and/or prevention, preferably, treatment of viral infections, e.g., influenza (Cardani et al. 2017), with pharmaceutical compositions comprising cell populations of the invention (preferably, comprising macrophages) is contemplated. For treatment of influenza, e.g., intrapulmonary application, e.g., as described herein, or spray application, may be carried out. If the viral pathogen is known, antibodies (of a suitable species which can be recognized by the macrophages in the composition) directed to surface antigens of the virus may further be included in the pharmaceutical composition. Antibodies directed against surface antigens of bacteria can also be added to compositions intended for treatment of bacteria.
Typically, administration of the pharmaceutical composition will be at the site of an infection or at the site of a potential infection. For example, for pulmonary infection, pulmonary (intrapulmonary) administration is optimal. However, if the pulmonary disease is so severe that it is likely that the cells will not reach the site of infection and/or that an intubation would be of high risk to the patient, e.g., in the case of severe COPD or severe pulmonary infection, i.e., other modes of application are also contemplated. Other suitable modes of administration include i.v. administration, inhalation based systems (sprays, e.g., similar to an asthma spray), topical administration, e.g., to wounds such as infected wounds or wounds in danger of being infected, ocular administration (e.g., upon ocular infection), nasal administration, administration to an organ due to be transplanted or administration near the side of infection (e.g. near to implant associated infections).
In general, iPSC from the patient (e.g., a human patient) may be used for generation of the myeloid cells and, accordingly, autologous myeloid cells (preferably, macrophages) of the invention. However, this is not required, as the elimination of bacteria by allogeneic macrophages administered to a patient may be quicker than rejection of the macrophages. If long term survival of the transplanted macrophages is not required or maybe even not desirable, e.g., in acute bacterial infections without a genetic disease background, allogeneic macrophages, producible in a cost-effective way by industrial scale bioreactor systems as an off-the-shelf product, could be applied. In particular, in the context of pulmonary administration, survival and functionality of administered macrophages after administration has been shown.
Of note, the use of allogeneic myeloid cells of the invention would, at least in immunocompetent recipients, minimize the risk of tumor formation, since the allogeneic cells can be expected to be immunologically rejected within the first two weeks. Nevertheless, repeated application of off-the-shelf preparations would be possible, if different HLA-haplotypes are applied. It is also possible to use myeloid cells (e.g., macrophages) generated form pluripotent stem cells (e.g., iPSC) either selected (or engineered) for immunocompatibility or lack of expression of HLA molecules.
Based on the experiments conducted by the inventors, about 4×106 macrophages (calculated for total cell numbers in the cell population of the invention) successfully treated pulmonary infections in mice of about 25 g. Lower cell numbers are expected to be sufficient for treatment, e.g., about 4×105 to about 4×106 per mouse, or about 1×106 to about 2×106 per mouse. This translates to about 1.6×107/kg to about 1.6×108/kg or about 5×107/kg to 1×108/kg. Consequently, for example, a 60 kg human patient may be treated with about 1×109 to 1×1010 macrophages. The number of cells required for successful treatment of course depends on a number of factors which can be assessed by the clinician, e.g., the general health of the patient, in particular, the immune status, the severity of the disease and bacterial load. It is considered that significantly less cells are needed for prevention than for treatment. In case of wound healing or wound infections, similar assessments by the clinician maybe performed to elucidate therapeutic cell numbers. For example, 4×105 to about 8×106 macrophages/cm2 may be sufficient for treatment.
In addition to the application of iPSC-derived macrophages, e.g., for the treatment of infectious diseases, other iPSC-derivatives may alternatively or additionally be applied to target a variety of diseases. Suspension-based differentiation cultures also allow for the generation of other iPSC-derived myeloid cells, and the stirred tank bioreactor technology is also suitable for the generation, e.g., of iPSC-derived granulocytes. Such granulocytes may, e.g., be used in combination with macrophages and/or alone for an improved treatment of bacterial infections, e.g., as listed above, or for the treatment of fungal infections.
Thrombocytes obtainable according to the method of the invention may be suitable e.g., for use in the treatment of thrombocytopenia, in particular following anti-cancer chemotherapy and/or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation either prophylactically (in particular to prevent intracranial bleeding) preemptive (e.g. in anticipation of major surgery) or therapeutically in bleeding episodes. Similarly such thrombocytes could be used in functional platelet deficiencies such as drug- and here in particular aspirin-induced or congenital such as Glanzmann thrombasthenie or Bernard Soulier syndrome.
Dendritic cells obtainable according to the method of the invention may be suitable e.g. for use in vaccination strategies against (i) tumors and other malignancies or (ii) pathogens including viruses such as EBV or CMV.
Alternatively, the large-scale differentiation with only IL3 could be employed to generate a myeloid progenitor population suitable for cryopreservation and the subsequent on demand differentiation towards therapeutic cell types of choice.
Cell populations of the invention, preferably, comprising macrophages, are also useful for applications, e.g., in vitro, such as
Some of these in vitro uses may benefit from spraying of the cells, e.g., for disinfection or for coating of materials for transplantation. The cell populations of the invention may thus also be in the form of an administration system or kit suitable for spraying the cells, wherein, e.g., the cells are in a container suitable for spraying which may be linked to an atomizer.
The invention also provides a method of preparing a protein, comprising carrying out a method of the invention of preparing myeloid cells, e.g., macrophages, and isolating a protein produced by the embryoid bodies, the myeloid cell forming complexes and/or the myeloid cells, preferably, by the myeloid cells. The protein may be an intracellular protein or a membrane protein. Preferably, the protein is a protein secreted into the cell culture medium. Advantageously, it can be prepared from the cell culture medium, e.g., at the end of the suspension culture of the invention, e.g., when the cells are isolated from the medium for cell harvesting. The protein may e.g., be a cytokine, a chemokine, a growth factor, a 5100 protein and a recombinant protein. For expression of recombinant proteins, the myeloid cells are genetically engineered to express the protein, e.g., by stable or transient transfection. The inventors for example found that the macrophages cultured according to the method of the invention produced high amounts of S100 proteins, also called S100 alarms, which have medical uses, e.g., in the treatment of sepsis in newborns, as an immunomodulator or for treatment of cardiologic disorders.
iPSC Cultivation
Human iPSC (hCD34iPSC16) have been previously generated from mobilized peripheral blood CD34+cells (Lachmann et al., 2014) and were culture on irradiated murine embryonic fibroblasts (MEF) in iPSC medium (knock-out DMEM, 20% knock out serum replacement, 1 mM L-glutamine, 1% NEAA, 1% penicillin/streptomycin (all Invitrogen, Karlsruhe, Germany), 0.1 mM β-mercaptoethanol (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, Mo., United States), and 10 ng/ml bFGF (PeproTech). Basic-FGF was omitted from the maintenance medium for the last 4-5 days prior to EB formation.
Classical adherence-based hematopoietic differentiation of human iPSC was performed as previously described (Lachmann et al., 2015). In brief, PSC colonies (3 wells of a 6-well plate, approx. 3×106 cells) were disrupted to fragments using collagenase-IV, and EB formation was induced by cultivation for 5 days in iPSC medium supplemented with 10 μM Rock inhibitor (Y-27632; Tocris) in six-well suspension plates on an orbital shaker. Subsequently, EBs were manually selected using a binocular and transferred to tissue culture six-well plates and cultivation in differentiation medium I (X-VIVO 15, Lonza) supplemented with 1% penicillin-streptomycin (Life Technologies), 25 ng/ml human IL3 and 50 ng/ml human M-CSF (both PeproTech). From day 10-15 onwards, iPSC-MACs were harvested from the supernatant once a week.
To achieve hematopoietic differentiation in suspension, largest EBs were selected by sedimentation properties (sedimentation <10 min) and transferred to differentiation medium I in 6-well suspension plates on the orbital shaker (Celltron, Infors HT) at 85 revolutions per minute (rpm). From day 10-15 onwards, iPSC-MACs were harvested from the medium once a week. For differentiation into other myeloid cell types, APEL medium was used as described previously (Ng et al., 2008). For differentiation into granulocytic and erythroid cells, 25 ng/ml hIL3 combined with 50 ng/ml hG-CSF or 100 ng/ml hSCF plus 3U hEPO, respectively, were applied.
The bioreactor (DASbox Mini bioreactor system, Eppendorf) was setup and calibrated as previously described (Kempf et al., 2015). In brief, the 250 ml glass vessel was equipped with an 8-blade impeller (60° pitch) and probes for online monitoring of biomass (Aber Instruments), pH, DO as well as control of temperature. Calibration was performed in 120 ml chemically defined X-VIVO 15 (Lonza).
For hematopoietic differentiation in the bioreactor, iPSC were expanded to twenty 6-well plates and cultivated for 3 days in the presence of bFGF. EB formation was performed equivalent to adherent cultures. After 5 days, EBs were selected by sedimentation properties (sedimentation <10 min) and transferred to the equilibrated bioreactor. Cells were cultivated in X-VIVO 15 supplemented with IL3 and M-CSF (differentiation medium I) at 37° C. with constant headspace-gassing at 3 L/h (21% O2; 5% CO2) and stirring at 50 rpm. To monitor MCFCs integrity and macrophages formation, 1 ml samples were collected 1-2 times per week via the sampling port without interrupting the culture process. Differentiation medium I was manually replaced every 6-7 days with optional fed of 20 ml after 3-4 days. Macrophages were harvested weekly by separation from MCFC via sedimentation (4-5 min) and subsequent filtering of the medium through a 100 nm strainer. Retained MCFCs were returned to the bioreactor. Macrophages were collected from filtered medium via centrifugation at 300×g for 4 min.
Data from online monitoring were processed using Microsoft Excel 2016 and GraphPad Prism 6. Supernatant was analysed for concentration of glucose and lactate using YSI 2700 select biochemistry analyser, for osmolarity using Osmomat 300 (Gonotec) and for concentration of lactate dehydrogenase according to manufacturer's instruction (MAK066, Sigma) using a microplate reader (Paradigm, Beckman Coulter).
For further maturation, cells freshly harvested from MCFCs, were cultured in differentiation medium II (RPMI1640 medium supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum (FCS), 2 mM L-glutamine, 1% penicillin-streptomycin) containing 50 ng/ml hM-CSF for macrophage, 50 ng/ml hG-CSF for granulocyte, and 100 ng/ml SCF and 3U/ml EPO for erythroid differentiation for at least 7 days.
All healthy donors gave written informed consent according to the local ethical committee at Hannover Medical School. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) were isolated from the peripheral blood of healthy volunteers by gradient centrifugation using Biocoll Separating Solution (40 min, 400×g; Biochrome, Billerica, Mass.). Subsequently, cells were cultured in RPMI1640 medium supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum, 2 mM L-glutamine, 1% penicillin-streptomycin (all Invitrogen), and hIL3 and hM-CSF (50 ng/ml each, PeproTech) for one week. After this, PBMC-MACs were cultivated for further 3-4 days in differentiation medium containing 50 ng/ml M-CSF only.
Flow cytometric analysis of myeloid cells was performed as described (Lachmann et al., 2015; Lachmann et al., 2014). For macrophages, PBS supplemented with 10% FCS was used to prevent unspecific binding. Cells were analyzed with a FACScalibur cytometer (Beckton & Dickinson, Heidelberg, Germany) and analyzed with FlowJo software (TreeStar, Ashland, Oreg.). Antibodies were purchased from eBioscience: hTRA-1-60-PE (Cat-No: 12-8863-80), hCD11b-APC (Cat-No: 17-0118-41), hCD14-PE (Cat-No: 12-0149-42), hCD163-APC (Cat-No: 17-1639-41, hCD16-FITC (Cat-No: 11-0168-41), hCD34-FITC (Cat-No: 11-0349-41) and isotype-controls: mouse-IgG1a-PE (Cat-No: 12-4714-41), FITC (Cat-No: 11-4714-41) or APC (Cat-No: 17-4714-41), and rat-IgG2a-PE (Cat-No: 12-4321-81). Antibodies from Biolegend San Diego, Calif., United States: hCD86-APC (Cat-No: 305411), hCD66b-FITC (Cat-No: 305104) or hCD45-PE (Cat-No: 304007).
For flow-cytometric analysis of mouse lung and BALF, samples were fixed using 4% PFA. After this, samples were incubated with fc receptor blocking antibodies (CD16/CD32, eBioscience, Cat-No: 14-0161-81) for 20 min to prevent unspecific binding. Used antibodies were purchased from Biolegend San Diego, Calif., United States: hCD45-PeCy7, and eBioscience: mGR1-eFluor450.
20,000-50,000 cells were spun on glass slides at 600×g for 7 min and stained for 5 min in 0.25% May-Grunwald and 20 min in 0.4% Giemsa stain modified solution (Sigma).
The phagocytic activity of iPSC-MACs derived from suspension or adherent cultures and terminally differentiated on tissue-culture plates was assessed by flow cytometry. Therefore, 1×105 cells were incubated with pHrodo™ Red E. coli BioParticles® Conjugate (MolecularProbes/Thermo Fisher Scientific, Schwerte, Germany) or medium for 2 h at 37° or 4° C. as a negative control. After incubation the cells were put on ice for 10 min. Analysis was performed using a Beckman Coulter FC500 flow cytometer.
The functional capacity of iPSC-MACs and PBMC-MACs to phagocytose vital P. aeruginosa was assessed using GFP-PAO1 (wild-type P. aeruginosa PAO1 tagged with green fluorescent protein (GFP) by Tn7 transformation (Bjarnsholt et al., 2005), (kindly provided by Thomas Bjarnsholt, University of Copenhagen) and compared to PBMC-derived Macrophages (PBMC-MACs). For the phagocytosis assay, 1×105 iPSC-MACs were incubated for 2 h with 6×105 CFU GFP-PAO1 at 37° C. or 4° C. as a negative control. Medium controls were treated similar. After incubation, cells were put on ice for 10 min and subsequently fixed with 2% paraformaldehyde (PFA) solution for 30 min. Analysis was performed using a Beckman Coulter FC500 flow cytometer.
Macrophages were grown on 1 cm diameter round coverslips. Latex beads (1 μm diameter) were added to cells at 4° C. and adhesion of latex beads to the surface of the macrophages was allowed for 5 min. Following samples were washed with cold PBS and warmed up with fresh culture medium to 37° C. Phagocytosis was allowed for up to 1 h and samples were fixed at different time points using 1.5% Paraformaldehyde, 1.5% Glutaraldehyde in 150 mM Hepes pH 7.35. Samples were then dehydrated using an increasing methanol series. Critical point drying was performed using a CPD030 critical point dryer (Balzers, Lichtenstein) following manufacturer instructions. Coverslips were then sputtered with gold (Sem Coating System, Polarion) and SEM was carried out using a Philips SEM 505 (Eindhoven, The Netherlands).
For experiments P. aeruginosa laboratory strain PAO1 (Klockgether et al., 2010) was taken from a stock culture kept at −80° C. and grown in Luria Broth (LB) overnight. After washing with sterile PBS the desired infectious dose was extrapolated from a standard growth curve. For the determination of the actual dosage, inoculates were serially plated on LB agar plates via the drop-plate method (Herigstad et al., 2001) and CFU determined after 16-18 h incubation at 37° C.
Terminally differentiated human iPSC-MACs or human PBMC-MACs were seeded on 24-well plates (500.000 cells/well) and cultured overnight. On the next day, cells were washed three times with PBS. Subsequently, P. aeruginosa laboratory strain PAO1 in RPMI medium without antibiotics (MOI10) was centrifugated onto the cells (600×g) and incubated at 37° C. Cells with medium only served as non-infected controls. After 1 h cells were de-attached, washed and resuspended in RNA lysis buffer. RNA isolation was performed with RNAeasy micro Kit (Quiagen) according to manufacturer's instructions. Human iPSC samples were obtained after sorting of iPSC for TRA-1-60+to separate iPSC from feeder cells.
The Microarray utilized in this study represents a refined version of the Whole Human Genome Oligo Microarray 4×44K v2 (Design ID 026652, Agilent Technologies), called ‘054261On1M’ (Design ID 066335) developed in the Research Core Unit Transcriptomics (RCUT) of Hannover Medical School. Microarray design was created at Agilent's eArray portal using a 1×1M design format for mRNA expression as template. All non-control probes of design ID 026652 have been printed five times within a region comprising a total of 181560 Features (170 columns×1068 rows). Four of such regions were placed within one 1M region giving rise to four microarray fields per slide to be hybridized individually (Customer Specified Feature Layout). Control probes required for proper Feature Extraction software operation were determined and placed automatically by eArray using recommended default settings.
30 ng of total RNA were used to prepare aminoallyl-UTP-modified (aaUTP) cRNA (Amino Allyl MessageAmp™ II Kit; #AM1753; Life Technologies) as directed by the company (applying one-round of amplification). The labelling of aaUTP-cRNA was performed by use of Alexa Fluor 555 Reactive Dye (#A32756; LifeTechnologies).
cRNA fragmentation, hybridization and washing steps were carried-out as recommended in the ‘One-Color Microarray-Based Gene Expression Analysis Protocol V5.7’, except that 500 ng of each fluorescently labelled cRNA population were used for hybridization.
Slides were scanned on the Agilent Micro Array Scanner G2565CA (pixel resolution 3 μm, bit depth 20). Data extraction was performed with the ‘Feature Extraction Software V10.7.3.1’ using the extraction protocol file ‘GE1_107_Sep09.xml’, except that ‘Multiplicative detrending’ algorithm was inactivated.
Measurements of on-chip replicates (quintuplicates) were averaged using the geometric mean of processed intensity values of the green channel, ‘gProcessedSignal’ (gPS) to retrieve one resulting value per unique non-control probe. Single Features were excluded from averaging, if they i) were manually flagged, ii) were identified as Outliers by the Feature Extraction Software, iii) lie outside the interval of ‘1.42× interquartile range’ regarding the normalized gPS distribution of the respective on-chip replicate population, or iv) showed a coefficient of variation of pixel intensities per Feature that exceeded 0.5.
Averaged gPS values were normalized by quantile normalization approach first. Subsequently, values were additionally processed by global linear scaling: All gPS values of one sample were multiplied by an array-specific scaling factor. This factor was calculated by dividing a ‘reference 75th Percentile value’ (set as 1500 for the whole series) by the 75th Percentile value of the particular Microarray to be normalized (Array I′ in the formula shown below). Accordingly, normalized gPS values for all samples (microarray data sets) were calculated by the following formula:
normalized gPSArray i=gPSArray i×(1500/75th PercentileArray i)
Finally, a lower intensity threshold (surrogate value) was defined based on intensity distribution of negative control features. This value was fixed at 15 normalized gPS units. All of those measurements that fell below this intensity cutoff were substituted by the respective surrogate value of 15.
Normalized microarray data of all non-control features were imported into Omics Explorer software v3.2 (Qlucore) under default import settings for Agilent One Color mRNA Microarrays, except that any normalization option was deselected. Accordingly, data processing steps during import were: 1) log base 2 transformation, 2) baseline transformation to the median.
Heatmap clustering analysis and generation of GO-based heatmaps were performed in Omics Explorer. Top 100 upregulated genes were calculated using the RCUTAS tool (V1.7; Hannover Medical School) and processed using Venny 2.1 (http://bioinfogp.cnb.csic.es/tools/venny). Gene set enrichment analysis for cell type classification based on the human gene atlas and gene ontology analysis of biological processes and molecular function were conducted using Enrichr (https://amp.pharm.mssm.edu/Enrichr). Gene analysis for disease and function were performed using Ingenuity pathway analysis (Qiagen).
Microarray data were deposited under accession number E-MTAB-5436 in the ArrayExpress database (www.ebi.ac.uk/arrayexpress).
In order to analyze the secretion of human cytokines in bioreactor samples or BALF samples, Luminex® analysis with a Cytokine Human 14-Plex Panel (Millipore, Schwalbach, Germany) was performed as described before (Lachmann et al., 2015). Data were acquired on a Luminex-200 System and analyzed with the Xponent software v.3.0 (Life Technologies).
HuPAP (129S4-Rag2tm1.1Flv Csf2/Il3tm1.1(CSF2,IL3)Flv Il2rgtm1.1Flv/J) mice (Willinger et al., 2011) were obtained from the Jackson Laboratory and housed in the central animal facility of Hannover Medical School. NSG mice (NOD.Cg-Prkdcscid Il2tm/Wj1SzJZtm) were obtained from the central animal facility of Hannover Medical School. Both immunodeficient mouse strains were maintained under pathogen free conditions in individually ventilated cages (IVC) with free access to food and water. All animal experiments were approved by the Lower Saxony State animal welfare committee and performed according to their guidelines.
For infection with P. aeruginosa or pulmonary iPSC-MAC transplantation, anesthetized (ketamine/midazolam) mice were instilled via the trachea after oral intubation. For the simultaneous infection experiments, iPSC-MAC (4×106/animal) and PAO1 (NSG: 5×105 and huPAP 0.2×105 CFU) were resuspended in PBS and mixed in a total volume of 60 μl. For solely infected mice the same CFU was applied in 60 μl PBS. To avoid phagocytosis before instillation, cell/bacteria mixes were kept on ice all the time. For the therapeutic PiMT experiments, huPAP animals were infected with 0.3×105 CFU PAO1 (in a volume of 30 μl PBS) after anesthesia with ketamine/midazolam. Control mice received the same volume PBS. After 4 h, mice were anesthetized by isoflurane inhalation and the second instillation with 50 μl PBS or 4×106 iPSC-MACs in PBS was performed. Control mice again received the same volume PBS. To determine the disease score of the animals we used a scoring matrix as described previously (Munder et al., 2005). After 24 h, animals were sacrificed and end-analysis was performed.
Non-invasive head-out spirometry investigating 14 lung function parameters was performed on conscious restrained mice as previously described (Wolbeling et al., 2010). Mice were positioned in glass inserts, their breathing causes air to flow through a pneumotachograph. A pressure transducer creates an electrical signal, which is analysed using NOTOCORD HEM software (Version 4.2.0.241, Notocord Systems SAS, Croissy Sur Seine, France). The parameters of tidal volume (measured in ml), expiratory time, inspiratory time, time of inspiration+expiration, relaxation time and the flow at 50% of the expiratory tidal volume (EF50) were selected to characterize murine lung function during infection.
Broncho-alveolar lavage was performed by cannulating the murine trachea post-mortem. The right lung was rinsed with 1 ml of PBS for three times. Fresh BALF was used for photometric analysis of haemoglobin. After this, BALF samples were centrifuged and supernatants were stored at −80° C. for Luminex analysis. Pellets were fixed and stained for flow cytometry
The right lungs of the euthanized mice were ligated, resected and homogenized with a tissue homogenizer (Polytron PT 1200, Germany). Total bacterial numbers were assessed from serial dilutions of the homogenates which were cultured on Luria-Bertani plates using the drop plate method (Herigstad et al., 2001).
At the dedicated time points the animals were sacrificed. Right lungs were filled with OCT buffer and fixed in neutral buffered 4% PFA for 3 days at 4° C. For control animals, left lungs were used. Tissues were trimmed according to the RITA-Guidelines (Ruehl-Fehlert et al., 2003), dehydrated (Shandon Hypercenter, XP) and subsequently embedded in paraffin (TES, Medite). Sections (2-3 μm thick, microtom Reichert-Jung 2030) were deparaffinized in xylene and H&E stained according to standard protocols. Blinded evaluation (Axioskop 40, Zeiss microscope) and histological scoring of the sections was performed as described before (Dutow et al., 2013) by a trained pathologist.
GraphPad Prism 6 and 7 was applied to perform unpaired Student's T test or analysis of variance (ANOVA). Unless otherwise stated, mean±s.e.m. is plotted. Asterisks denote: *P<0.05; **P<0.01; ***P<0.001; ****P<0.0001.
Derivation of Multiple Human iPSC-Derived Myeloid Lineages in Dynamic Suspension Culture
Although the generation of different mature hematopoietic cell types from PSC has been proven successful using classical two-dimensional (2D) differentiation cultures (Ackermann et al., 2015; Choi et al., 2009; Dias et al., 2011; Feng et al., 2014; Sturgeon et al., 2014), these systems do not allow for the generation of iPSC-derived cells in clinically relevant quantities. Thus, the inventors developed a suspension-based (3D) hematopoietic differentiation protocol, suitable for process upscaling in industry-compatible stirred tank bioreactors (Kropp et al., 2016b; Zweigerdt, 2009). Using a well-characterized hiPSC line (hCD34iPSC16) (Lachmann et al., 2014) with classical brightfield morphology (
Of note, different myeloid subsets were generated in following the same suspension-based protocol but simply switching the cytokine composition. Thus, IL3 and G-CSF allowed continuous generation of CD16+CD66b+iPSC-granulocytes (
Up-Scaling Continuous Production of hiPSC-MACs is Enabled in Stirred Tank Bioreactors
The inventors then translated the suspension-based differentiation into stirred tank bioreactors using an industry-compatible system (DASbox Mini Bioreactor System) (Olmer et al., 2012) previously applied for the efficient cultivation of human iPSC and their differentiation into cardiomyocytes (Kempf et al., 2014) (
Bioreactor-Derived iPSC-MACs Recapitulate Phenotypic and Transcriptional Characterization of PBMC-MACs
Detailed characterization of bioreactor-derived iPSC-MACs revealed a CD45+CD11b+CD163+CD14+CD34−TRA1-60− phenotype, and a typical morphology after adherence to tissue culture plates (
Comparison of the top 100 upregulated genes in iPSC-MACs versus pluripotent hiPSC and PBMC-MACs versus pluripotent hiPSC revealed a common gene set of 54 upregulated genes. These transcripts including CD14, CD68, CSFR1, CCR1 and CYBB are assigned to CD14+monocytes, whole blood and CD33+ myeloid cells (
Table 1 shows the top 100 genes which are differentially regulated (either upregulated or downregulated) in the macrophages of the invention directly compared to macrophages derived from PBMC.
In Vitro Antimicrobial Activity of Bioreactor-Derived iPSC-MACs
Next, bioreactor-derived iPSC-MACs were evaluated for their in vitro antimicrobial activity. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) at different time points after incubation of iPSC-MACs with fluorescently labeled latex beads revealed typical changes in the overall cell morphology early after the stimulus and efficient phagocytic uptake of beads over time (
Hierarchical cluster analysis of gene ontologies (GOs) associated with inflammatory response or (activation of) innate immune response showed marked upregulation of cytokines (e.g. IL23A, TNFα, ILIA, IL6, INFG1), chemokines (e.g. CCL5, CCL20, CCL4, CXCL3) and molecules involved in NFκB signaling in response to pathogen contact (
iPSC-MACs Prevent Respiratory Infections by Pseudomonas aeruginosa
To evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of iPSC-MACs in vivo, a humanized mouse model C; 129S4-Rag2tm1.1Flv Csf2/Il3tm1.1(CSF2,IL3)Flv Il2rgtm1.1Flv/J (huPAP mice), an immunodeficient strain with impaired alveolar macrophage development (Willinger et al., 2011) was utilized. HuPAP mice recapitulate hallmarks of the human disease pulmonary alveolar proteinosis (PAP), including the susceptibility to pulmonary infections. In addition, the iPSC-MACs were utilized in a second immunodeficient mouse model: NOD.Cg-Prkdcscid Il2rgtm/Wj1/SzJZtm (NSG), which have impaired lymphopoiesis, but show normal alveolar macrophage development.
First, huPAP mice were infected with the P. aeruginosa laboratory strain PAO1 and co-administered with 4×106 iPSC-MACs in the same instillation process (solely PAO1 infected mice served as controls). The infection course was closely monitored and mice were sacrificed 24 h post-infection for end analysis (
Similar results were obtained in NSG mice, a second immunodeficient mouse strain with normal alveolar macrophage development. Infected NSG animals developed profound symptoms of infection, such as a high disease score and a profound drop in rectal temperature 6 h and 24 h post-infection. In clear contrast, animals simultaneously receiving iPSC-MACs displayed normal body temperature and only minimally increased disease scores 6 h and 24 h post-infection, respectively (
Therapeutic PiMT Rescues Mice from Severe Respiratory Infections
After demonstrating the efficacy of iPSC-MACs in simultaneous infection experiments, the inventors evaluated a clinically more relevant therapeutic PiMT treatment approach. In these experiments, huPAP mice were infected intra-pulmonary with P. aeruginosa and closely monitored for 3-4 h until first disease symptoms developed (determined by a disease score >5). Subsequently, in this model, mice received 4×106 iPSC-MACs (infected+PiMT) only after the infection-related symptoms were readily manifested. Of note, infected control mice received PBS only instead of PiMT (infected) (
In this infection and treatment schedule, therapeutic PiMT treated mice showed a decrease in the disease score as well as a normalization of rectal temperature and body weight to a degree comparable to non-infected animals already within 4-8 hours post treatment. In contrast, infected mice receiving PBS showed pronounced disease progression over time (
In the present study, the inventors have evaluated a treatment concept that utilizes macrophages as a cellular therapeutic for bacterial infections. Since clinically-relevant numbers of autologous or donor derived macrophages can hardly be produced from somatic sources, the inventors investigated the possibility to utilize hPSCs for generating substantial quantities of functional macrophages.
The use of iPSC derivatives as a cellular approach to target infections has not been seriously considered so far. This might be explained by the fact that the supposed potential of hPSC for the production of specific progenies in therapeutically relevant numbers has not yet been fully translated into practice. Taking advantage of recent advances in culture medium formulations, the inventors tried to culture and differentiate human PSCs as floating aggregates, and adapted stirred tank bioreactor technology to stem cell requirements, allowing for clinical scale-up of iPSC and their derivatives. In order to develop the application of iPSC-macrophages as a cellular therapeutic against bacterial infections, and more specifically to clear pulmonary infections triggered by P. aeruginosa, they first established a scalable and continuous hematopoietic differentiation process for human iPSC in fully equipped bioreactors.
For in vivo studies, huPAP mice were employed, an immunodeficient strain which lacks alveolar macrophages. This is of clinical relevance, as this mouse model recapitulates important hallmarks of pulmonary alveolar proteinosis (PAP) (Willinger et al., 2011), including the susceptibility to pulmonary infections typically observed in PAP patients (Trapnell et al., 2003). In this mouse model, prevention of acute P. aeruginosa infection by simultaneous PiMT, or, even more important, therapeutic PiMT was highly effective within a short time frame. These proof-of-concept experiments were performed with a high cell dose. Similar therapeutic effects may be achievable with lower cell numbers. However, even with this maximum cell dose, no apparent adverse events were observed in either treatment scenario, which concurs with observations from pulmonary macrophage transplantation therapy studies employing bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMDM) (Happle et al., 2014; Suzuki et al., 2014).
Considering a body weight of 25 g per mouse, clinical translation of iPSC-MACs for the treatment of respiratory infections would require approximately 1×1010 iPSC-MACs for a 60 kg patient. Even without further process optimization, this would translate to a 40-60 L production scale, which is in principle feasible with current bioreactor technologies (Kropp et al., 2016b). Of note, continuous process monitoring of the bioreactor-based differentiation of the invention revealed a substantial increase in biomass especially in the first 2-3 days of the repeated batch culture. This was followed by partial recovery of dissolved oxygen levels and a profound drop in pH in the last days before medium refreshment. These observations suggest the presence of process-limiting factors and highlight the potential for further process optimization. This can be achieved by cultivation at higher cell densities combined with the application of perfusion systems and feedback control of oxygen, pH and other process parameters, which can multiple the increases in cell yields of hPSCs and their progenies (Kropp et al., 2016a).
Given the impressive in vivo functionality of iPSC-MACs in the acute infection model, a therapeutic efficacy of PiMT in chronic infections with P. aeruginosa, as frequently observed in patients suffering from chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (Rakhimova et al., 2009) or cystic fibrosis (CF) (Oliver et al., 2000) is expected. Especially CF represents an interesting disease scenario for the application of PiMT, as the disease-causing mutations in the cystic fibrosis conductance regulator (CFTR) gene also hamper functionality of professional phagocytes and thus the host's defense against infections (Bonfield et al., 2012; Bruscia et al., 2009). While single PiMT showed therapeutic efficacy for acute infections, repetitive therapeutic intervention or the application of genetically enhanced cells (Pasula et al., 2016) might be required to clear the established infection in chronic diseases.
Long term engraftment and sustained functionality of the transplanted iPSC-MACS are expected. In the tested transplantation scenarios, iPSC-MACs were still detected at 24 h, however later time point were not investigated in this study. Earlier studies demonstrated engraftment of BMDM for more than one year (Suzuki et al., 2014). Moreover, pulmonary transplantation of murine macrophages derived from different multipotent progenitor cells showed the capacity for chromatin remodeling, adaption to the local tissue environment and long-term integration (Happle et al., 2014; Lavin et al., 2014; Suzuki et al., 2014; van de Laar et al., 2016). Along this line, the iPSC-MACs of the invention demonstrate rapid upregulation of pro-inflammatory gene expression after pathogen contact in vitro as well as efficient anti-microbial activity in vivo, suggesting their ability to response to the inflammatory environment in the lung after transplantation.
The strong and rapid anti-microbial and therapeutic effect observed by the inventors is of particular importance for a broad applicability of iPSC-MACs to target bacterial infections and a quick clinical implementation. The anti-microbial activity of iPSC-MAC against P. aeruginosa was evaluated, however, a phagocyte-based cell therapy might allow for a broad spectrum of applications in a number of different infection scenarios caused by other gram negative or positive bacteria such as Streptococcus pneumoniae or Staphylococcus aureus, or pathogens associated with implant infections that meanwhile pose an immense health and economical problem. This being said, new form of treatment are of specific clinical relevance considering the increasing numbers of pathogens resistant to standard or reserve antibiotic therapy (Aloush et al., 2006; Falgenhauer et al., 2016; Gould, 2013; Hirsch and Tam, 2010; Liu et al., 2016; Schroeder and Stephens, 2016).
In summary, the inventors provide the therapeutic application of PSC-derived phagocytes for the treatment of bacterial infections. They demonstrate the feasibility of phagocyte production under defined conditions that allow for clinical and industrial scale up and provide evidence for the efficacy and safety of iPSC-MAC transplantation as a new treatment approach targeting, e.g., severe respiratory infections. This technology, including process upscaling and the generation of additional hematopoietic cell types as well as assessment in other preclinical models allow for innovative cell-based treatment strategies for a wide variety of diseases.
Single iPSC Generation:
Single iPSCs were derived directly from iPSCs cultured on murine feeder cells. iPSCs cultured on murine feeder cells were incubated with Accutase (Cell Dissociation Reagent, StemPro™ Thermo Scientific) for maximum 5 min in the cell culture incubator at 37° C. Accutase reaction was stopped by diluting it with either PBS or DMEM/F12 media (Thermofisher Scientific). Pipetting up and down of resuspended cells helped to have dissociation of clumps and getting single iPSCs (not more than 3 times and very slowly). Cells were counted and subjected to monolayer cultivation on defined matrices (see next step). Alternatively, single iPSC can be derived from iPSC cultured on matrix coated dishes (e.g. GelTrex (Thermofisher Scientific), Matrigel (Corning Fisher Scientific), or Laminin (e.g. CellAdhere Laminin-521; Stem Cell Technologies) treating the cells as described before.
6-well tissue culture plates (e.g. NUNC plates (Thermofisher Scientific)) were coated with a matrix (e.g., GelTrex (Thermofisher Scientific), Matrigel (Corning Fisher Scientific), or Laminin (e.g. CellAdhere Laminin-521; Stem Cell Technologies) for at least one hour. Single iPSCs were seeded in the pre-coated plates in ROCK-Inhibitor (10 μM) supplemented E8100 or E850 media (Stem Cell Technologies) for further expansion. Maximum 2×105 generated single iPSCs were cultured as monolayer in each well of 6-well plate. The media was changed on day 2 of and passaged at day 3 or day 4. The media was not changed the day after the seeding. These cultures were maintained for at least 10 passages.
5×105 single iPSCs cultivated as single cells on matrix for more than two passages were inoculated in 3 ml ROCK-Inhibitor (10 μM) supplemented E850 or E6 media (Stem Cell Technologies) in Greiner CELLSTAR multiwell culture plates (Sigma Aldrich) on an orbital shaker (70 rpm) in a suspension culture for aggregate formation. Aggregate formation started within 24 hours. The media was changed at day 2, changing 2 to 2.5 ml of media. Aggregates on day 3 were transferred either for differentiation or passaged as single cell in suspension.
Induction of hematopoietic differentiation was started by mesoderm priming.
Mesoderm priming was started by transferring about 100 aggregates on 3 days into 3 ml X-VIVO15 supplemented with 50 ng/ml hVEGF, 50 ng/ml hBMP4 and 20 ng/ml hSCF which was followed by later (at day 4 of mesoderm priming) addition of 25 ng/ml of IL3. Subsequent hematopoietic differentiation of primed aggregates was pursued by changing the media to 3 ml of 25 ng/ml IL-3 and 50 ng/ml M-CSF supplemented X-VIVO15. Mesoderm priming and, following that, hematopoetic differentiation were done on orbital shaker of 85 rpm.
The resulting cells were suitable for clinical application in humans.
Macrophages were produced or isolated, e.g., from mice, according to methods known in the art. Alternatively, the macrophage cell line U937 was used.
The cells were washed and incubated with a hypertonic solution (e.g., a sugar solution such as a sucrose solution) for 15 min to 1 h, typically, for about 15 min at 4° C.-37° C., preferably at 37° C. Hypertonic solutions had an osmolarity of more than 300 mosm, preferably, more than 350 mosm. Reduced size, as measured by forward scatter in flow cytometry for incubations with 300 mosm (control), 600 mosm, 800 mosm, and 1000 mosm is shown in
For murine primary macrophages, the average diameter was determined by microscopy and computational analysis e.g. with ImageJ after incubation at the defined omolarities:
300 mosm→mean area 155.7 μm2, corresponding to an average diameter of 14.08 μm
600 mosm→mean area 131.6 μm2, corresponding to an average diameter of 12.94 μm
800 mosm→mean area 113.9 μm2, corresponding to an average diameter of 12.04 μm
1000 mosm→mean area 115.2 μm2, corresponding to an average diameter of 12.11 μm.
For U937 cells, the average diameter was determined by microscopy and computational analysis e.g. with ImageJ after incubation at the defined omolarities:
300 mosm→mean area 113.8 μm2, corresponding to an average diameter of 12.04 μm
600 mosm 94.34 μm2, corresponding to an average diameter of 10.96 μm
800 mosm 82.63 μm2, corresponding to an average diameter of 10.26 μm
1000 mosm 74.26 μm2, corresponding to an average diameter of 9.72 μm.
Macrophages were produced according the method of the invention as described in Example 1. The inventors found by mass spectrometry and Western blotting that the cells release high levels of S100 protein into the culture supernatant of the suspension culture, including but not limited to S100A7, S100A8 and S100S9 variant. Gene expression of S100A8 and S100A9 showed >500-fold increase compared to hPSCs and comparable expression to PBMC-derived macrophages. The S100 protein is isolated from the cell culture supernatant, e.g., by affinity chromatography, or by other chromatographic methods as known in the art, or a combination thereof.
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17169454.0 | May 2017 | EP | regional |
| Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/EP2018/061574 | 5/4/2018 | WO | 00 |
