Stent coating

Abstract
A stent having a polymeric coating for controllably releasing an included active agent. The polymeric coating includes a blend of a first polymeric material, which if alone, would release the agent at a first, higher rate, and a second polymeric material, which if alone would release the agent at a second, lower rate over a longer time period. One stent coating utilizes a faster releasing hydrophilic polymeric material and a slower releasing hydrophobic material. One stent coating includes a blend of a faster releasing PLA-PEO copolymer and a slower releasing PLA-PCL copolymer. One active agent is Taxol. One use of the Taxol delivering stent is to inhibit restenosis following angioplasty.
Description




FIELD OF THE INVENTION




The present application is generally related to medical devices. More specifically, the present invention relates to stent coatings capable of releasing agents over time. In particular, the present invention includes a blend of two co-polymers adapted to release restenosis-inhibiting agents over a sustained time period.




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




Vascular disease is a leading cause of death and disability in the developed world. In the United States, more than half of all deaths are due to cardiovascular disease. Atherosclerosis is the most common form of vascular disease and leads to insufficient blood supply to body organs, which can result in hearts attacks, strokes, and kidney failure. Atherosclerosis is a form of vascular injury in which the vascular smooth muscle cells in the artery wall undergo hyperproliferation and invade and spread into the inner vessel lining, which can make the vessels susceptible to complete blockage when local blood clotting occurs. This can lead to death of the tissue served by that artery. In the case of a coronary artery, this blockage can lead to myocardial infarction and death.




Coronary artery blockage can be treated with coronary artery bypass surgery and/or angioplasty. Both procedures may initially appear to be successful, but can be in effect undone by the effect of restenosis, or the recurrence of stenosis after such a treatment. Restenosis is believed to include hyperproliferation of vascular smooth muscle cells. In particular, about one third of patients treated using angioplasty have restenosis and blockage within 6 months after the procedure.




To prevent vessel blockage from restenosis, stents are used. Stents are nominally tubular structures and can have either solid walls or lattice like walls, and can be either balloon expandable or self-expanding. After angioplasty balloon dilatation, the previously constricted vessel is at least temporarily widened. A stent can be delivered on a catheter and expanded in place or allowed to expand in place against the vessel walls. With the stent in place, restenosis may or may not be inhibited, but the probability and/or degree of blockage is reduced due to the structural strength of the stent opposing the inward force of any restenosis. Restenosis may occur over the length of the stent and be at least partially opposed by the stent. Restenosis may also occur past the ends of the stent, where the inward forces of the stenosis are unopposed.




Therapeutic agents to inhibit restenosis have been used with varying success. Taxol, an antimicrotubule agent isolated from the bark of the western Pacific Yew tree, is especially effective in inhibiting some cancers and is believed to be effective in combating restenosis. Systemic administration of Taxol can have undesirable side effects, making local administration a preferred mode of treatment.




Local administration of Taxol may be more effective when carried out over a longer time period, such as a time period at least matching the normal reaction time of the body to the angioplasty. At the same time, it may be desirable to provide an initial high dosage of Taxol over an initial period. Local administration of Taxol over a period of days or even months may be most effective in inhibiting restenosis.




Controlled release of therapeutic agents can utilize various technologies. Devices are known having a monolithic layer or coating incorporating a heterogeneous solution and/or dispersion of an active agent in a polymeric substance, where the diffusion of the agent is rate limiting, as the agent diffuses through the polymer to the polymer-fluid interface and is released into the surrounding fluid. In some devices, a soluble substance is also dissolved or dispersed in the polymeric material, such that additional pores or channels are left after the material dissolves. A matrix device is generally diffusion limited as well, but with the channels or other internal geometry of the device also playing a role in releasing the agent to the fluid. The channels can be pre-existing channels or channels left behind by released agent or other soluble substances.




Erodible or degradable devices typically have the active agent physically immobilized in the polymer. The active agent can be dissolved and/or dispersed throughout the polymeric material. The polymeric material is often hydrolytically degraded over time through hydrolysis of labile bonds, allowing the polymer to erode into the fluid, releasing the active agent into the fluid. Hydrophilic polymers have a generally faster rate of erosion relative to hydrophobic polymers. Hydrophobic polymers are believed to have almost purely surface diffusion of active agent, having erosion from the surface inwards. Hydrophilic polymers are believed to allow water to penetrate the surface of the polymer, allowing hydrolysis of labile bonds beneath the surface, which can lead to homogeneous or bulk erosion of polymer.




What would be desirable is a stent coating capable of releasing a therapeutic agent over a sustained time period. What would be advantageous is a stent coating able to release an agent over approximately the same time period as the need for the therapeutic agent. A method for controlling the dosage rate and period of an active agent by controlling the composition of a stent coating would also be advantageous.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




The present invention includes a stent having a stent body, a coating disposed over at least a portion of the body, and an active agent releasably dispersed in at least part or portion of the coating. A preferred active agent is paclitaxel, analogues, derivatives, and combinations thereof. The coating can include a blend of a first co-polymer having a first, high release rate and a second co-polymer having a second, lower release rate relative to the first release rate. The first and second copolymers are preferably erodible or biodegradable. In one embodiment, the first copolymer is more hydrophilic than the second copolymer. In one embodiment, the first copolymer includes a polylactic acid/polyethylene oxide (PLA-PEO) copolymer and the second copolymer includes a polylactic acid/polycaprolactone (PLA-PCL) copolymer.




The relative amounts and dosage rates of active agent delivered over time can be controlled by controlling the relative amounts of the faster releasing polymers relative to the slower releasing polymers. For higher initial release rates the proportion of faster releasing polymer can be increased relative to the slower releasing polymer. If most of the dosage is desired to be released over a long time period, most of the polymer can be the slower releasing polymer. The stent can be coated by spraying the stent with a solution or dispersion of polymer, active agent, and solvent. The solvent can be evaporated, leaving a coating of polymer and active agent. The active agent can be dissolved and/or dispersed in the polymer. In some embodiments, the co-polymers can be extruded over the stent body.




In use, the stent can be put into position in a body vessel such as a coronary vessel after a procedure such as angioplasty. The stent can be left in position, and the erodible or biodegradable coating allowed to degrade. As the polymeric coating degrades, the active agent can absorb into the vessel walls.











DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS





FIG. 1

is a perspective view of a stent in accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the present invention;





FIG. 2

is a perspective view of a further preferred stent in accordance with the present invention; and





FIG. 3

is a magnified, partial plan view of the stent of

FIG. 1

, illustrating the polymeric coating of the present invention disposed thereon.











DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION




The present invention includes a stent having a polymeric coating for delivering a biologically active agent or other therapeutic substance over a target time period. The polymeric coat includes a first polymer and a second polymer, where the first polymer alone would release the active agent at a faster rate than the second polymer would alone, and thus, deplete the active agent immobilized by the first polymer in a shorter time relative to the second polymer. In preferred embodiments, the first polymer is hydrophilic and the second polymer is hydrophobic.




Referring now to the drawings wherein like reference numerals refer to like elements throughout the several views,

FIG. 1

shows a perspective view of a stent


10


, in a non-expanded form, in accordance with the present invention. The skeletal frame of the stent


10


preferably includes wire-like members


12


forming a distinct, repetitive serpentine pattern. This repetitive serpentine pattern consists of multiple U-shaped curves


14


. The areas within the U-shaped curves


14


are open


16


. With no recognizable beginning or end to this serpentine pattern, wire


12


forms expandable serpentine element


18


. Serpentine elements


18


are arranged along the longitudinal axis of the stent


10


so that the U-shaped curves


14


of abutting serpentine elements


16


may be joined through an interconnecting element


20


. Through the interconnecting elements


20


, a continuous wire


12


framework is created between multiple serpentine elements


18


forming the stent


10


.





FIG. 2

shows a perspective view of a further preferred stent


110


in accordance with the present invention. This stent


110


, also has a continuous wire


112


framework. This framework, however, is maintained by a repetitive rectangular-patterned element


114


. The areas within the rectangular wire element


114


are open


116


. The rectangular wire elements


114


are aligned lengthwise in the longitudinal axis of the stent


110


. Adjacent rectangular wire elements


114


are offset half the lengthwise distance of a similar rectangular wire element


114


. The end of the stent is formed by the full completion of one rectangular wire element


114


, and the subsequent open end of the adjacent rectangular wire element


122


. Thus, the ends of the stent possess an alternating open-closed wire configuration.




These stents are exemplary of stents which may incorporate the present invention. These, and other suitable stents are disclosed in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 08/874,190, filed Jun. 13, 1997, entitled “Polymeric Layered Stent”, of which the disclosure is incorporated herein by reference.




The term “wire”, as used in describing the frame material, should not be mistaken as being limited to metallic materials. In fact, the “wire” forming the stents


10


&


110


may consist of any biocompatable material possessing the structural and mechanical attributes necessary for supporting a diseased vessel. Thus, both metallic and polymeric materials are suitable. Examples of preferred biocompatable metallic materials include stainless steel, tantalum, nitinol, and gold. Preferred polymeric materials may be selected from the list immediately below, which is not exhaustive:




poly(L-lactide) (PLLA), poly(D,L-lactide) (PLA), polyglycolide (PGA), poly(L-lactide-co-D,L-lactide) (PLLA/PLA), poly(L-lactide-co-glycolide) (PLLA/PGA), poly(D, L-lactide-co-glycolide) (PLA/PGA), poly(glycolide-co-trimethylene carbonate) (PGA/PTMC), polyethylene oxide (PEO), polydioxanone (PDS), polycaprolactone (PCL), polyhydroxylbutyrate (PHBT), poly(phosphazene), polyD,L-lactide-co-caprolactone) (PLA/PCL), poly(glycolide-co-caprolactone) (PGA/PCL), polyanhydrides (PAN), poly(ortho esters), poly(phoshate ester), poly(amino acid), poly(hydroxy butyrate), polyacrylate, polyacrylamid, poly(hydroxyethyl methacrylate), elastin polypeptide co-polymer, polyurethane, polysiloxane and their copolymers.




The skeletal framework of the stents may be formed through various methods as well. The framework may be welded, molded, or consist of filaments or fibers which are wound or braided together in order to form a continuous structure.




Often it is beneficial to both stent and treat the localized area of a diseased vessel. A therapeutic agent, therefore, can be incorporated into a polymer and applied to the stent


10


as a polymeric surface treatment. The incorporation of a therapeutic agent into a surface treatment greatly enhances the scope of this medical device by transforming the stent into a drug-delivery system. Drugs and treatments which utilize anti-thrombogenic agents, anti-angiogenesis agents, anti-proliferative agents, growth factors, and radiochemicals may be readily deployed from within the matrix of the polymeric surface treatment. Specific examples of preferred therapeutic agents include angiopeptin, colchicine, lovastatin, trapidil, ticlopidine, hirudin, Taxol, heparin, and growth factors VEGF, TGF-beta, IGF, PDGF, and FGF.




The application of such a surface treatment is generally accomplished through either a dipping or spraying process. For either process, a solvent carrier is preferred in order to incorporate the therapeutic agent within the polymer matrix. The applied mixture preferably comprises a solvent, a polymer, and a therapeutic agent, with subsequent evaporation of the solvent to leave a polymeric coating


30


as depicted in FIG.


3


.




As previously stated, the present invention is directed to a polymeric coating incorporating a releasable therapeutic agent, wherein upon implantation the rate and duration of the agent is controlled to selected parameters which optimize treatment. It has been found that selected ratios of a mixture of a hydrophilic polymer and a hydrophobic polymer provide desired control of drug release.




In a preferred embodiment, the hydrophilic polymer includes a co-polymer of polylactic acid (PLA) and polyethylene oxide (PEO). In a preferred embodiment, the second polymer includes a co-polymer of polylactic acid (PLA) and poly(caprolactone) (PCL). The PLA-PEO copolymer is hydrophilic and erodes faster relative to a similar hydrophobic polymer in the body environment where the coated stent is positioned. The PLA-PCL copolymer is hydrophobic, and degrades more slowly than a comparable hydrophilic polymer. In a preferred embodiment, the polymer coating is formed of a blend of PLA-PCL and PLA-PEO. In preferred embodiments, the hydrophilic polymer has a molecular weight of greater than about 10,000 (Mn) and the second polymer has a molecular weight of greater than about 20,000 (Mn).




Formation of PLA-PEO copolymers is well known to those skilled in the art. See for example, U.S. Patent Nos. 5,476,909 and 5,548,035, herein incorporated by reference. Formation of PLA-PCL copolymers is also known to those skilled in the art. See for example, U.S. Pat. No. 5,470,829, herein incorporated by reference.




One preferred embodiment includes about 20% by weight PLA-PEO and about 80% by weight PLA-PCL copolymers. Another embodiment includes about 50% by weight PLA-PEO copolymer and about 50% by weight PLA-PCL copolymer. The embodiment having about 20% PLA-PEO and 80% PLA-PCL delivers the active agent over a longer time period, but with a lower initial release, relative to the embodiment having the 50%/50% PLA-PEO/PLA-PCL combination. The relative amounts of PLA-PEO and PLA-PCL can be adjusted to achieve the desired combination of high initial dosage rate and subsequent lower but longer lasting dosage rate.




In one preferred embodiment, the active agent or therapeutic substance is a restenosis-inhibiting agent. A preferred restenosis-inhibiting agent includes a microtubule stabilizing agent such as Taxol, paclitaxel, analogues, derivatives, and mixtures thereof. For example, derivatives believed suitable for use in the present invention include 2′-succinyl-taxol, 2′-succinyl-taxol triethanolamine, 2′-glutaryl-taxol, 2′-glutaryl-taxol triethanolamine salt, 2′-O-ester with N-(dimethylaminoethyl) glutamine, and 2′-O-ester with N-(dimethylaminoethyl) glutamide hydrochloride salt.




The Taxol can be dissolved or dispersed in the polymeric materials and the polymeric materials adhered to the stent body. In embodiments having a blended combination of PLA-PEO and PLA-PCL, the polymeric combination can be sprayed, dipped or extruded onto the stent.




The polymeric coating of the present invention can be used with various stents. A preferred use for the coating is for coronary stents. The stents can be used following angioplasty to inhibit restenosis. The stent body can serve to hold the vessel open against any restenosis and to deliver the restenosis-inhibiting agent. In one embodiment, the coating is substantially continuous over the stent body. In another embodiment, the coating is primarily over the stent structure but not over the apertures. For example, in a stent formed of a wire mesh, the coating can closely adhere to the wires without covering the apertures therebetween.




In use, a stent according to the present invention can be selected according to desired release dosage profile and provided to the treating physician. After an angioplasty procedure, the coated stent having the restenosis-inhibiting active agent can be delivered to the stenosed, recently dilated coronary artery region. Delivery can be accomplished using methods well known to those skilled in the art, such as mounting the stent on an inflatable balloon disposed at the distal end of a catheter. With the stent advanced into position near the dilated region, the stent can be forced outward and into position against the inner vessel walls. If the stent is self-expanding, the stent can be delivered by deploying the stent from within a delivery device, allowing the stent to expand against the inner vessel walls. The active agent, as it is released from the eroding polymeric coating, can be absorbed by the inner vessel walls. Over time, the polymeric coating is eroded by bodily fluids.




Numerous advantages of the invention covered by this document have been set forth in the foregoing description. It will be understood, however, that this disclosure is, in many respects, only illustrative. Changes may be made in details, particularly in matters of shape, size, and arrangement of parts, without exceeding the scope of the invention. The inventions's scope is, of course, defined in the language in which the appended claims are expressed.



Claims
  • 1. An implantable stent prosthesis for delivering a biologically active material to a patient comprising:(a) a stent body having a surface adapted for exposure to body tissue of the patient; (b) a coating disposed over at least a portion of the surface of the stent body; wherein the coating comprises: (i) a biologically active material selected from the group consisting of anti-thrombogenic agents, anti-angiogenesis agents, anti-proliferative agents, growth factors, radiochemicals, and lovastatin; and (ii) a mixture of a first co-polymer and a second co-polymer, wherein said first co-polymer releases the biologically active material at a first rate and said second co-polymer releases the biologically active material at a second rate, wherein said second rate is slower than said first rate.
  • 2. The stent of claim 1, wherein said first co-polymer is hydrophilic.
  • 3. The stent of claim 1, wherein said second co-polymer is hydrophobic.
  • 4. The stent of claim 1, wherein said first co-polymer is hydrophilic and said second co-polymer is hydrophobic.
  • 5. The stent of claim 1, wherein said first co-polymer comprises polylactic acid/polyethylene oxide.
  • 6. The stent of claim 1, wherein said second co-polymer comprises polylactic acid/polycaprolactone.
  • 7. The stent of claim 1, wherein said first co-polymer includes polylactic acid/polyethylene oxide and said second co-polymer includes polylactic acid/polycaprolactone.
  • 8. The stent of claim 7, wherein said coating comprises about 20% by weight polylactic acid/polyethylene oxide and about 80% by weight polylactic acid/polycaprolactone.
  • 9. The stent of claim 7, wherein said coating comprises about 50% by weight polylactic acid/polyethylene oxide and about 50% by weight polylactic acid/polycaprolactone.
  • 10. The stent of claim 1, wherein said anti-thrombogenic agent is heparin or ticlopidine.
  • 11. The stent of claim 1, wherein said anti-angiogenesis agent is trapidil.
  • 12. The stent of claim 1, wherein said anti-proliferative agent is selected from the group consisting of angiopeptin, colchicine, hirudin, paclitaxel, paclitaxel analogues, paclitaxel derivatives, and combinations thereof.
  • 13. The stent of claim 1, wherein said growth factors are selected from the group consisting of VEGF, TGF-beta, IGF, PDGF, and FGF.
  • 14. A method of making an implantable stent prosthesis for delivering a biologically active material to a patient, wherein said method comprises:(a) providing a stent body having a surface adapted for exposure to body tissue of the patient; (b) applying a coating over at least a portion of said surface; wherein said coating comprises: (i) a biologically active material selected from the group consisting of anti-thrombogenic agents, anti-angiogenesis agents, anti-proliferative agents, growth factors, radiochemicals, and lovastatin; and (ii) a mixture of a first co-polymer and a second co-polymer, wherein said first co-polymer releases said biologically active material at a first rate and said second co-polymer releases said biologically active material at a second rate, and wherein said second rate is slower than said first rate.
  • 15. The method of claim 14, wherein said anti-thrombogenic agent is heparin or ticlopidine.
  • 16. The method of claim 14, wherein said anti-angiogenesis agent is trapidil.
  • 17. The method of claim 14, wherein said anti-proliferative agent is selected from the group consisting of angiopeptin, colchicine, hirudin, paclitaxel, paclitaxel analogues, paclitaxel derivatives, and combinations thereof.
  • 18. The method of claim 14, wherein said growth factors are selected from the group consisting of VEGF, TGF-beta, IGF, PDGF, and FGF.
  • 19. The method of claim 14, wherein said first co-polymer is hydrophilic.
  • 20. The method of claim 14, wherein said second co-polymer is hydrophobic.
  • 21. The method of claim 14, wherein said first co-polymer comprises polylactic acid/polyethylene oxide.
  • 22. The method of claim 14, wherein said second co-polymer comprises polylactic acid/polycaprolactone.
  • 23. The method of claim 14, wherein said first co-polymer includes polylactic acid/polyethylene oxide and said second co-polymer includes polylactic acid/polycaprolactone.
  • 24. The method of claim 14, wherein said coating comprises about 20% by weight polylactic acid/polyethylene oxide and about 80% by weight polylactic acid/polycaprolactone.
  • 25. The method of claim 14, wherein said coating comprises about 50% by weight polylactic acid/polyethylene oxide and about 50% by weight polylactic acid/polycaprolactone.
  • 26. An implantable stent prosthesis for delivering a restinosis inhibiting agent to a patient comprising:(a) a stent body having a surface adapted for exposure to body tissue of the patient; (b) a coating disposed over at least a portion of the surface of the stent body, wherein the coating comprises: (i) the restinosis inhibiting agent selected from the group consisting of paclitaxel, paclitaxel analogues, paclitaxel derivatives, and combinations thereof; and (ii) a mixture of about 50% by weight of a copolymer of polylactic acid/polyethylene oxide and about 50% by weight of a copolymer of polylactic acid/polycaprolactone.
  • 27. The implantable stent of claim 26, wherein said paclitaxel derivatives are selected from the group consisting of 2-succinyl-taxol, 2′-succinyl-taxol triethanolamine, 2′-glutaryl-taxol, 2-glutaryl-taxol triethanolamine salt, 2-O-ester with N-(dimethylaminoethyl) glutamine, and 2′-O-ester with N-(dimethylaminoethyl) glutamide hydrochloride salt.
  • 28. An implantable stent prosthesis for delivering a biologically active material to a patient comprising:(a) a stent body having a surface adapted for exposure to body tissue of the patient; (b) a coating disposed over at least a portion of the surface of the stent body; wherein the coating comprises: (i) a biologically active material selected from the group consisting of anti-thrombogenic agents, anti-angiogenesis agents, anti-proliferative agents, growth factors, radiochemicals, and lovastatin; and (ii) a mixture of a first polymer and a second polymer, wherein said first polymer releases the biologically active material at a first rate and said second polymer releases the biologically active material at a second rate, wherein said second rate is slower than said first rate.
  • 29. The stent of claim 28, wherein said first polymer is hydrophilic.
  • 30. The stent of claim 28, wherein said second polymer is hydrophobic.
  • 31. The stent of claim 28, wherein said first polymer is hydrophilic and said second polymer is hydrophobic.
  • 32. A method of making an implantable stent prosthesis for delivering a biologically active material to a patient, wherein said method comprises:(a) providing a stent body having a surface adapted for exposure to body tissue of the patient; (b) applying a coating over at least a portion of said surface; wherein said coating comprises: (i) a biologically active material selected from the group consisting of anti-thrombogenic agents, anti-angiogenesis agents, anti-proliferative agents, growth factors, radiochemicals, and lovastatin; and (ii) a mixture of a first polymer and a second polymer, wherein said first polymer releases said biologically active material at a first rate and said second polymer releases said biologically active material at a second rate, and wherein said second rate is slower than said first rate.
  • 33. The method of claim 32, wherein said first polymer is hydrophilic.
  • 34. The method of claim 33, wherein said second polymer is hydrophobic.
Parent Case Info

This application is a continuation of application Ser. No. 09/346,975 filed Jul. 2, 1999, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,258,121.

US Referenced Citations (145)
Number Name Date Kind
3663288 Miller May 1972 A
3779792 Stoy et al. Dec 1973 A
4047957 De Winter et al. Sep 1977 A
4100309 Micklus et al. Jul 1978 A
4119094 Micklus et al. Oct 1978 A
4263188 Hampton et al. Apr 1981 A
4306998 Wenzel et al. Dec 1981 A
4373009 Winn Feb 1983 A
4387024 Kurihara et al. Jul 1983 A
4391797 Folkman et al. Jul 1983 A
4459317 Lambert Jul 1984 A
4487808 Lambert Dec 1984 A
4492622 Kuypers Jan 1985 A
4536179 Anderson et al. Aug 1985 A
4548844 Podell et al. Oct 1985 A
4642267 Creasy et al. Feb 1987 A
4666437 Lambert May 1987 A
4675361 Ward, Jr. Jun 1987 A
4692352 Huddleston Sep 1987 A
4705709 Vailancourt Nov 1987 A
4721117 Mar et al. Jan 1988 A
4734092 Millerd Mar 1988 A
4748986 Morrison et al. Jun 1988 A
4768507 Fischell et al. Sep 1988 A
4770664 Gogolewski Sep 1988 A
4780352 Palumbo Oct 1988 A
4833014 Linder et al. Jun 1989 A
4841976 Packard et al. Sep 1989 A
4867173 Leoni Oct 1989 A
4876126 Takemura et al. Dec 1989 A
4884579 Engelson May 1990 A
4923464 DiPisa, Jr. May 1990 A
4925698 Klausner et al. May 1990 A
4943460 Markle et al. Jul 1990 A
4959074 Halpern et al. Sep 1990 A
4964409 Tremulis Oct 1990 A
4969890 Sugita et al. Nov 1990 A
4980231 Baker et al. Dec 1990 A
4994071 MacGregor Feb 1991 A
5002582 Guire et al. Mar 1991 A
5007928 Okamura et al. Apr 1991 A
5008363 Mallon et al. Apr 1991 A
5019096 Fox, Jr. et al. May 1991 A
5026607 Kiezulas Jun 1991 A
5037656 Pitt et al. Aug 1991 A
5037677 Halpern et al. Aug 1991 A
5040543 Badera et al. Aug 1991 A
5049403 Larm et al. Sep 1991 A
5057371 Canty et al. Oct 1991 A
5066705 Wickert Nov 1991 A
5067489 Lind Nov 1991 A
5069217 Fleischhacker, Jr. Dec 1991 A
5069226 Yamauchi et al. Dec 1991 A
5079093 Akashi et al. Jan 1992 A
5080683 Sulc et al. Jan 1992 A
5080924 Kamel et al. Jan 1992 A
5084315 Karimi et al. Jan 1992 A
5091205 Fan Feb 1992 A
5092885 Yamada et al. Mar 1992 A
5102401 Lambert et al. Apr 1992 A
5102402 Dror et al. Apr 1992 A
5102417 Palmaz Apr 1992 A
5105010 Sundararaman et al. Apr 1992 A
5107852 Davidson et al. Apr 1992 A
5128170 Matsuda et al. Jul 1992 A
5129890 Bates et al. Jul 1992 A
5160790 Elton Nov 1992 A
5211183 Wilson May 1993 A
5213111 Cook et al. May 1993 A
5217026 Stoy et al. Jun 1993 A
5222971 Willard et al. Jun 1993 A
5240994 Brink et al. Aug 1993 A
5241970 Johlin, Jr. et al. Sep 1993 A
5243996 Hall Sep 1993 A
5250613 Bergstrom et al. Oct 1993 A
5266359 Spielvogel Nov 1993 A
5275173 Samson et al. Jan 1994 A
5282823 Schwartz et al. Feb 1994 A
5283063 Freeman Feb 1994 A
5290585 Elton Mar 1994 A
5304121 Sahatjian Apr 1994 A
5304140 Kugo et al. Apr 1994 A
5324261 Amundson et al. Jun 1994 A
5370614 Amundson et al. Dec 1994 A
5380299 Fearnot et al. Jan 1995 A
5383928 Scott et al. Jan 1995 A
5419760 Narciso, Jr. May 1995 A
5423885 Williams Jun 1995 A
5443458 Eury Aug 1995 A
5443496 Schwartz et al. Aug 1995 A
5447724 Helmus et al. Sep 1995 A
5449372 Schmaltz et al. Sep 1995 A
5449382 Dayton Sep 1995 A
5464650 Berg et al. Nov 1995 A
5470829 Prisell et al. Nov 1995 A
5476909 Kim et al. Dec 1995 A
5512055 Domb et al. Apr 1996 A
5514154 Lau et al. May 1996 A
5527337 Stack et al. Jun 1996 A
5545208 Wolff et al. Aug 1996 A
5548035 Kim et al. Aug 1996 A
5562922 Lambert Oct 1996 A
5569463 Helmus et al. Oct 1996 A
5576072 Hostettler et al. Nov 1996 A
5578075 Dayton Nov 1996 A
5591227 Dinh et al. Jan 1997 A
5605696 Eury et al. Feb 1997 A
5609629 Fearnot et al. Mar 1997 A
5616608 Kinsella et al. Apr 1997 A
5620738 Fan et al. Apr 1997 A
5624411 Tuch Apr 1997 A
5626862 Brem et al. May 1997 A
5637113 Tartaglia et al. Jun 1997 A
5651986 Brem et al. Jul 1997 A
5674192 Sahatjian et al. Oct 1997 A
5674241 Bley et al. Oct 1997 A
5674242 Phan et al. Oct 1997 A
5679400 Tuch Oct 1997 A
5697967 Dinh et al. Dec 1997 A
5700286 Tartaglia et al. Dec 1997 A
5702754 Zhong Dec 1997 A
5709874 Hanson et al. Jan 1998 A
5712326 Jones et al. Jan 1998 A
5716981 Hunter et al. Feb 1998 A
5733925 Kunz et al. Mar 1998 A
5739237 Russell et al. Apr 1998 A
5755769 Richard et al. May 1998 A
5776184 Tuch Jul 1998 A
5799732 Gonzalez et al. Sep 1998 A
5837008 Berg et al. Nov 1998 A
5902332 Schatz May 1999 A
5957975 Lafont et al. Sep 1999 A
5972027 Johnson Oct 1999 A
5977163 Li et al. Nov 1999 A
6099561 Alt Aug 2000 A
6099562 Ding et al. Aug 2000 A
6099563 Zhong Aug 2000 A
6120536 Ding et al. Sep 2000 A
6231600 Zhong May 2001 B1
6258121 Yang et al. Jul 2001 B1
6287285 Michal et al. Sep 2001 B1
6299604 Ragheb et al. Oct 2001 B1
6306166 Barry et al. Oct 2001 B1
6335029 Kamath et al. Jan 2002 B1
6369039 Palasis et al. Apr 2002 B1
Foreign Referenced Citations (52)
Number Date Country
556 350 Oct 1983 AU
556 351 Oct 1986 AU
0 093 094 Nov 1983 EP
0 106 004 Apr 1984 EP
0 166 988 Jan 1986 EP
0 274 846 Jul 1988 EP
0 294 905 Dec 1988 EP
0 389 632 Oct 1990 EP
0 395 098 Oct 1990 EP
0 407 965 Jan 1991 EP
0 439 908 Aug 1991 EP
0 470 246 Feb 1992 EP
0 470 569 Feb 1992 EP
0 480 809 Apr 1992 EP
0 480 809 Apr 1992 EP
0 543 653 May 1993 EP
0 551 182 Jul 1993 EP
0 567 816 Nov 1993 EP
0 568 310 Nov 1993 EP
0 592 870 Apr 1994 EP
0 604 022 Jun 1994 EP
0 611 576 Aug 1994 EP
0 623 354 Nov 1994 EP
0 706 376 Apr 1996 EP
0 737 703 Oct 1996 EP
0 578 998 Dec 1997 EP
1 435 797 Oct 1973 GB
2 128 500 May 1984 GB
WO 9001969 Mar 1990 WO
WO 9013332 Nov 1990 WO
WO 9100163 Jan 1991 WO
WO 9107154 May 1991 WO
WO 9110424 Jul 1991 WO
WO 9111193 Aug 1991 WO
WO 9112779 Sep 1991 WO
WO 9200747 Jan 1992 WO
WO 9209073 May 1992 WO
WO 9212717 Aug 1992 WO
WO 9215286 Sep 1992 WO
WO 9306792 Apr 1993 WO
WO 9311120 Jun 1993 WO
WO 9421308 Sep 1994 WO
WO 9503795 Feb 1995 WO
WO 9603092 Feb 1996 WO
WO 9603984 Feb 1996 WO
WO 9625176 Aug 1996 WO
WO 9626689 Sep 1996 WO
WO 9829140 Jul 1998 WO
WO 9829141 Jul 1998 WO
WO 9836784 Aug 1998 WO
WO 9856312 Dec 1998 WO
WO 9921098 May 1999 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (23)
Entry
Bartoli et al., 1990 “In Vitro and In Vivo Antitumoral Activity of Free, and Encapsulated Taxol,” J. Microencapsulation 7(2):191-97.
Bruck, 1997, “Interactions of Synthetic and Natural Surfaces with Blood in the Physiological Environment,” J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Symposium 8:1-21.
Cohn et al., 1988, “Biodegradable PEO/PLA Blcok Copolymers,” Journal of Biomedical Materials Research 22(11):993-1009.
Cox et al., 1992, “Effect of Local Delivery of Heparin and Methotrexate on Neointimal Proliferation in Stented Porcine Coronary Arteries,” Coronary Artery Disease 3(3):237-248.
Cox et al., 1991, “Local Delivery of Heparin and Methotrexate Fails to Inhibit In Vivo Smooth Muscle Cell Proliferation,” Supplement to Circulation Abstracts From the 64th Scientific Sessions, 84(4):II-71, Abstract No. 0284.
Dev et al., 1993, “Kinetics of Drug Delivery to the Arterial Wall Via Polyurethane Coated Removable Nitinol Stent—Comparative Study of 2 Drugs,” Circulation Abstracts From the 66th Scientific Sessions, 88(4) (Part 2):I-3, Abstract No. 1657.
Esquivel et al., 1984, “Reduced Thrombogenic Characteristics of Expanded Polytetrafluorethylene and Polyurethane Arterial Grafts After Heparin Bonding,” Surgery, pp. 102-107.
Guyton et al., 1980, “Inhibition of Rat Arterial Smooth Muscle Cell Proliferation by Heparin,” Circulation Research 46(5):625-634.
Jampel et al., In Vitro Release of Hydrophobic Drugs From Polyanhydride Disks, Ophthalmic Surgery, dated prior to Jan. 8, 1991.
Kawahito et al., 1994, “Heparin Coated Percutaneous Cardiopulmonary Support for the Treatment of Circulatory Collapse After Cardiac Surgery,” ASAIO Journal 40(4):972-976.
Kishida et al., 1994, “Immobilization of Human Thrombomodulin onto Biomaterials,” ASAIO Journal, Slide Forum—Materials 4, pp. M840-M845.
Lambert et al., 1993, “A New Method For Arterial Drug Delivery Via Removable Stent,” JACC 21(2):483A, Abstract No. 834-2.
Lambert et al., 1993, “Localized Arterial Drug Delivery from a Polymer Coated Removable Metallic Stent: Kinetics and Bioactivity of Forskolin,” Circulation Abstracts from the 66th Scientific Sessions, 88(4)(Part 2):I-3, Abstract No. 1659.
Lindhardt et al., 19XX, “Differential Anticoagulant Activity of Heparin Fragments Prepared Using Microbial Heparinase,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry 257(13):7310-7313.
Miyama et al., 1977, “A New Antigrhombogenic Heparinized Polymer,” J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 11:251-265.
Moses et al., 1999, Inhibitors on Angiogenesis, Review, The Children's Hospital Medical Center, Boston, MA, dated prior to Jan. 8, 1999.
Nichols et al., 1984, “Effect of Heparin Bonding on Catheter-induced Fibrin Formation and Platelet Activation,” Circulation 70(5):843-850.
Pitt et al., 1980, “The Design of Controlled Drug Delivery Systems Based on Biodegradable Polymers,” Progress in Contraceptive Delivery Systems, MTP Press, Lancaster 1:17-18.
Sheppeck et al., 1991, “Examination of the Roles of Glycoprotein Ib and Glycoprotein Iib/IIIa in Platelet Deposition on an Artificial Surface Using Clinical Antiplatelet Agents and Monoclonal Antibody Blockage,” Blood 78(3):673-680.
Tang et al., 1993, “Regression of Collagen-Induced Arthritis with Taxol, A Microtubule Stabilizer,” Arthritis Rheum. 36(9)(Suppl.):42.
“A Powerful Case for LOPID,” Parke-Davis, dated prior to Jan. 8, 1999.
Whitborne, Presentation at the 2nd International Coronary Stenting Summit (Mar. 1-2, 1991).
Wilson, Internet Article dated Jan. 21, 1991, “Thromboresistant Plastic Coarding Treatment,” Research Partners, Inc., 2 pages.
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 09/346975 Jul 1999 US
Child 09/883870 US