Stent formed of a Biodegradable material

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 8585754
  • Patent Number
    8,585,754
  • Date Filed
    Friday, January 13, 2012
    13 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, November 19, 2013
    11 years ago
Abstract
A stent is fabricated utilizing a polymer that is selected for its tendency to degrade from the surface inwardly rather than undergo bulk erosion so as to substantially reduce the risk of large particles becoming detached and being swept downstream. Such polymer is hydrophobic yet has water-labile linkages interconnecting the monomers. Ester or imide bonds are incorporated in the polymer to render the surface degrading materials suitable for use in stent applications. The stent may be coated with such polymer or may be wholly formed therefrom.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

The present invention generally relates to expandable intraluminal vascular grafts, most often referred to as stents, and more particularly pertains to biodegradable stents which completely or partially degrade or are bioabsorbed over a period of time after deployment.


Stents are used to maintain the patency of vessels in the body. They are typically advanced through the vasculature to the deployment site while in a contracted state where they are then expanded to engage the vessel walls and thereby establish a flowpath therethrough. A stent can be moved along a guide wire previously positioned in the vessel and then expanded by the inflation of a balloon about which such stent is disposed. Subsequent deflation of the balloon and removal of it along with the guidewire leaves the stent in place and locked in its expanded state. It has been found that the continued exposure of a stent to blood can lead to undesirable thrombus formation, and the presence of a stent in a blood vessel can over time cause the blood vessel wall to weaken, which creates the potential for an arterial rupture or the formation of aneurisms. A stent can also become so overgrown by tissue after its implantation that its usefulness may be substantially diminished while its continued presence may cause a variety of problems or complications.


In certain situations it is therefore desirable for the stent to be biodegradable or bioabsorbable so as to curtail the adverse risks that would otherwise be associated with the stent's continued presence once its usefulness of the treatment site has ceased or has at least become substantially diminished. To such end, some stents have heretofore been wholly constructed of materials that are biodegradable or bioabsorbable. It is of course necessary to select a material that while biodegradable is nonetheless biocompatible and additionally, has the physical properties necessary to properly serve its function as a stent. Such physical properties include, among others, sufficient strength to support the loads a particular stent is to be subjected to in its function as a splint, the radial flexibility necessary for it to undergo expansion, longitudinal flexibility to allow it to be advanced through a contorted vasculature and conceivably to adapt to a non-linear deployment site.


Such characteristics have heretofore been achieved with the use of certain polymer materials such as polylactic acid, polylactic acid-glycolic acid copolymer, and polycaprolactone. However, all such previously known biodegradable/bioabsorbable stents exhibit bulk erosion and are as a consequence prone to break up into large particles as the matrix breaks down. Additionally, such materials have also been used as stent coatings to gradually release pharmacological agents that are infused throughout the coating. However, the bulk erosion to which such materials are inherently prone to can cause the coating to flake off or otherwise become detached. Should such large particles actually become dislodged before becoming completely degraded, they could be washed downstream and cause emboli.


A biodegradable stent is therefore needed that is initially capable of providing the necessary structural support to a body lumen and then gradually and completely degrades or is absorbed in a manner that precludes a break-up into large particles. Similarly, a biodegradable coating is needed that is not prone to flaking or breaking up into large particles. By preventing the break-up of the stent or of the stent coating into large particles that may subsequently be swept downstream, the potential for embolic complications is thereby avoided.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention provides a stent or optionally, a stent coating which degrades in a very controlled and uniform manner so as to substantially preclude the possibility of sizeable particles becoming detached and possibly causing embolic problems downstream. This is achieved by employing a material in the construction of the entire stent or in the coating of the stent that erodes in a very controlled manner. Such material is selected for its strength characteristics as well as its tendency to erode from the surface inwardly rather than being subject to bulk erosion. By incorporating pharmacological agents within the material, the stent or stent coating not only eventually vanishes from within the body lumen in which it was implanted but additionally dispenses the incorporated drug in a gradual manner.


Materials that exhibit the desired surface eroding characteristics without being subject to bulk erosion include polymers wherein the degradation rate of the matrix is faster than the rate of water penetration into the interior of the polymeric mass. Such polymers are hydrophobic but have water-labile linkages interconnecting the monomers. The hydrophobic property precludes water from penetrating into the interior of the polymer while water labile linkages nonetheless subject the surface to gradual erosion. As a result, the stent gradually degrades from the surface inwardly, substantially without the risk of large particles becoming dislodged.


While hydrophobic polymers with water-labile linkages are known, their limited strength and processing capabilities have restricted their usage to passive devices that neither perform a structural function nor are subject to stress or distortion. Drugs infused throughout such material implanted in the body in the form of a tablet or other shape are gradually released as the polymer degrades. As such, these surface degrading polymers have functioned as an effective drug delivery vehicle. The use of such polymers in stent applications has however been precluded as they are unable to support a lumen wall or remain attached to a stent as it undergoes deformation during its expansion.


The materials employed in either wholly forming a stent or in coating a stent in accordance with the present invention include hydrophobic polymers having water-liable linkages connecting the monomers that are fortified with the incorporation of ester or imide bonds. Examples of such polymers include polyanhydrides and polyorthoesters. Additionally, by employing such polymers in stent applications, a single device can be called upon to provide the necessary support to a body lumen and simultaneously dispense a pharmacological agent in a controlled manner.


These and other features and advantages of the present invention will become apparent from the following detailed description of a preferred embodiments which illustrate by way of example the principles of the invention.







DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

The stent of the present invention is employed to support or otherwise treat a targeted site within the vasculature. Such stent is introduced into the vasculature, advanced therethrough to the deployment site and expanded using conventional techniques and delivery systems. Once in position and subject to the continuous flow of blood therethrough, it gradually degrades, substantially without the risk inherent in previously known biodegradable stents or stents with biodegradable coatings of breaking up into or releasing sizeable particles that may be swept downstream and cause emboli.


The material employed in the manufacture of the stent of the present invention is a polymer that is simultaneously hydrophobic and has water-labile linkages interconnecting its monomers that are further fortified by ester or imide bonds. The hydrophobic nature of the polymer precludes the incursion of water into its interior while the water-labile bonds that are exposed on its surface nonetheless cause the polymer to degrade. Degradation thereby exclusively progresses from the material's surface inwardly to yield a much more uniform degradation rate and to preclude bulk erosion. The incorporation of the imide or ester bonds serves to impart sufficient strength to the material to enable it to provide the support that is required of a stent. Alternatively, if the material is used as stent coating, the incorporation of the imide or ester bonds impart sufficient strength to the material to prevent it from flaking off or otherwise becoming detached as the underlying stent undergoes the distortion attendant its being expanded by for example the inflation of a balloon.


Many of the stent's ultimate performance characteristics are controllable by the appropriate selection of the various dimensional parameters of the stent. Increasing the dimensions of various structural elements of the stent will generally serve to increase strength and decrease flexibility. Such effect would result from both an increase in the width or in the wall thickness of the stent's structural elements. The time period in which the stent would become totally degraded or absorbed is a function of the wall thickness of the various elements while the degradation rate is a function of the total area exposed to contact with the blood. By for example selecting a stent configuration which employs a large number of relatively narrow spine and strut elements to achieve a particular level of strength, the time in which the stent degrades when subjected to the blood flow can be substantially accelerated. Conversely, a stent configuration in which a relatively few, wide structural elements are employed causes the degradation rate to be somewhat retarded.


The stent's ultimate performance characteristics are of course also controllable by the appropriate selection of chemical variables. For example, the number of imide or ester bonds that are incorporated in the polymer material not only affects the ultimate strength and flexibility characteristics of the stent, but also has an effect on the rate at which the material degrades when subjected to blood flow. An increased bond content enhances strength, decreases flexibility and increases degradation time. The specific requirements of a particular application will ultimately determine the optimal combination of the stent configuration, wall thickness and ester or imide bond content.


Polymers that satisfy the above-described requirements include polyanhydrides and polyorthoesters. Representative examples of polyanhydride polymers suitable for use in the construction of a stent or formulation of a stent coating in accordance with the present invention include anhydride-co-imide ter polymers containing trimellitylimido-L-tyrosine, sebacic acid (SA) and 1,3 bis(carboxyphenoxy)propane. Other examples of suitable polyanhydrides include poly(fatty acid-sebacic acid) synthesized from erucic acid and sebacic anhydride p(EAD:SA) and poly(L-lactic acid-co-L-aspartic acid). Representative examples of polyorthoester polymers suitable for use in the construction of a stent or formulation of a stent coating in accordance with the present invention include poly(4-hydroxy-L-proline ester), poly(1, 10 decanediol-1, 10 decanediol dilactide) and poly(1, 2, 6 hexanetriol-trimethylorthoacetate). An ester or imide content of 20%-40% has been found to be effective to provide sufficient strength for a stent application.


The process for forming a polymer stent is well known in the art. A stent of the present invention is formed by first causing the appropriate reagents to react to form the desired polyanhydride or polyorthoester composition. During copolymer synthesis, the imide content of such composition is increased by incorporating higher imide containing monomers like trimellitylimido-L-tyrosine. Increasing imide content results in higher strength material. Flexibility of polyanhydrides like p(EAD:SA) can be increased by increasing the percentage of erucic acid dimer (EAD) during polymer synthesis. The ester content of such composition is increased by incorporating higher ester containing monomers such as L-proline ester or trimethyl orthoacetate.


Selected pharmacological agents can be added to the reagents so as to incorporate such materials throughout the polymer to thereby provide for the gradual dispensation of the drug over the service life of the stent. The blending may be accomplished either in solution or in a melt state. Drugs such as for example heparin or other proteins can readily be added to the reactants before or during the polymerization process. Alternatively, some drugs may be infused throughout the polymer after polymerization is completed. If desired, the drug may be applied to the surface of the cured polymer to cause the entire dosage to be released shortly after implantation.


The stent may be formed by any of a number of well known methods including the extrusion of the polymer into the shape of a tube. Preselected patterns of voids are then formed into the tube in order to define a plurality of spines and struts that impart a degree of flexibility and expandability to the tube.


Alternatively, the drug loaded polymer may applied to the selected surfaces of a stent formed of for example stainless steel or Nitinol. In order to coat all of the surfaces of the stent, the stent is immersed in the molten polymer. Alternatively, the polymer may be extruded in the form of a tube which is then codrawn with a tube of stainless steel or Nitinol. By codrawing two tubes of the polymer with the metal tube, one positioned about the exterior of the metal tube and another positioned within such metal tube, a tube having multi-layered walls is formed. Subsequent perforation of the tube walls to define a preselected pattern of spines and struts imparts the desired flexibility and expandability to the tube to create a stent.


While a particular form of the invention has been illustrated and described, it will also be apparent to those skilled in the art that various modifications can be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. Accordingly, it is not intended that the invention be limited except by the appended claims.

Claims
  • 1. A stent constructed of a biodegradable polymer, the polymer comprising at least one member of the group consisting of poly(L-lactic acid-co-L-aspartic acid), poly(4-hydroxy-L-proline ester), poly(1,10 decanediol-1,10 decanedioldilactide)and poly(1,2,6 hexanetriol-trimethylorthoacetate); wherein the stent degrades from its surface inwardly when subjected to blood flow, such that bulk erosion is effectively precluded.
  • 2. The stent of claim 1, wherein the polymer is loaded with a pharmacological agent.
  • 3. The stent of claim 2, wherein the pharmacological agent comprises heparin.
  • 4. The stent of claim 1, wherein the biodegradable polymer comprises poly(L-lactic acid-co-L-aspartic acid).
  • 5. The stent of claim 1, wherein the biodegradable polymer comprises poly(4-hydroxy-L-proline ester).
  • 6. The stent of claim 1, wherein the biodegradable polymer comprises poly(1,10 decanediol-1,10 decanediol dilactide).
  • 7. The stent of claim 1, wherein the biodegradable polymer comprises poly(1,2,6 hexanetriol-trimethylorthoacetate).
  • 8. The stent of claim 1, wherein the biodegradable polymer is poly(L-lactic acid-co-L-aspartic acid).
  • 9. The stent of claim 1, wherein the biodegradable polymer is poly(4-hydroxy-L-proline ester).
  • 10. The stent of claim 1, wherein the biodegradable polymer is poly(1,10 decanediol-1,10 decanediol dilactide).
  • 11. The stent of claim 1, wherein the biodegradable polymer is poly(1,2,6 hexanetriol-trimethylorthoacetate).
RELATED APPLICATIONS

The present application is a divisional application of U.S. application Ser. No. 11/968,543, which was filed on Jan. 2, 2008, and issued as U.S. Pat. No. 8,109,994, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 10/340,052, which was filed on Jan. 10, 2003, and issued as U.S. Pat. No. 7,390,333, which is a divisional of U.S. application Ser. No. 09/548,533, which was filed on Apr. 13, 2000, and issued as U.S. Pat. No. 6,527,801. The teachings in each of the aforementioned patent applications and patent are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.

US Referenced Citations (183)
Number Name Date Kind
3407164 Schmidt Oct 1968 A
3839743 Schwarcz Oct 1974 A
3900632 Robinson Aug 1975 A
4110497 Hoel Aug 1978 A
4321711 Mano Mar 1982 A
4346028 Griffith Aug 1982 A
4633873 Dumican et al. Jan 1987 A
4656083 Hoffman et al. Apr 1987 A
4718907 Karwoski et al. Jan 1988 A
4722335 Vilasi Feb 1988 A
4723549 Wholey et al. Feb 1988 A
4732152 Wallstén et al. Mar 1988 A
4733665 Palmaz Mar 1988 A
4739762 Palmaz Apr 1988 A
4740207 Kreamer Apr 1988 A
4743252 Martin, Jr. et al. May 1988 A
4768507 Fischell et al. Sep 1988 A
4776337 Palmaz Oct 1988 A
4816339 Tu et al. Mar 1989 A
4850999 Planck Jul 1989 A
4877030 Beck et al. Oct 1989 A
4878906 Lindemann et al. Nov 1989 A
4879135 Greco et al. Nov 1989 A
4902289 Yannas Feb 1990 A
4977901 Ofstead Dec 1990 A
4994298 Yasuda Feb 1991 A
5019090 Pinchuk May 1991 A
5028597 Kodama et al. Jul 1991 A
5059211 Stack et al. Oct 1991 A
5062829 Pryor et al. Nov 1991 A
5084065 Weldon et al. Jan 1992 A
5085629 Goldberg et al. Feb 1992 A
5100429 Sinofsky et al. Mar 1992 A
5108755 Daniels et al. Apr 1992 A
5112457 Marchant May 1992 A
5123917 Lee Jun 1992 A
5156623 Hakamatsuka et al. Oct 1992 A
5163951 Pinchuk et al. Nov 1992 A
5163952 Froix Nov 1992 A
5163958 Pinchuk Nov 1992 A
5167614 Tessmann et al. Dec 1992 A
5192311 King et al. Mar 1993 A
5197977 Hoffman, Jr. et al. Mar 1993 A
5234456 Silvestrini Aug 1993 A
5234457 Andersen Aug 1993 A
5236447 Kubo et al. Aug 1993 A
5240963 Domb et al. Aug 1993 A
5279594 Jackson Jan 1994 A
5282860 Matsuno et al. Feb 1994 A
5289831 Bosley Mar 1994 A
5290271 Jernberg Mar 1994 A
5306286 Stack et al. Apr 1994 A
5306294 Winston et al. Apr 1994 A
5328471 Slepian Jul 1994 A
5330500 Song Jul 1994 A
5342348 Kaplan Aug 1994 A
5342395 Jarrett et al. Aug 1994 A
5342621 Eury Aug 1994 A
5356433 Rowland et al. Oct 1994 A
5383925 Schmitt Jan 1995 A
5385580 Schmitt Jan 1995 A
5389106 Tower Feb 1995 A
5441515 Khosravi et al. Aug 1995 A
5443458 Eury Aug 1995 A
5455040 Marchant Oct 1995 A
5464650 Berg et al. Nov 1995 A
5486591 Domb et al. Jan 1996 A
5500013 Buscemi et al. Mar 1996 A
5502158 Sinclair et al. Mar 1996 A
5514379 Weissleder et al. May 1996 A
5527337 Stack et al. Jun 1996 A
5554120 Chen et al. Sep 1996 A
5578073 Haimovich et al. Nov 1996 A
5591607 Gryaznov et al. Jan 1997 A
5593403 Buscemi Jan 1997 A
5599301 Jacobs et al. Feb 1997 A
5599922 Gryaznov et al. Feb 1997 A
5605696 Eury et al. Feb 1997 A
5629077 Turnlund et al. May 1997 A
5631135 Gryaznov et al. May 1997 A
5637113 Tartaglia et al. Jun 1997 A
5667767 Greff et al. Sep 1997 A
5670558 Onishi et al. Sep 1997 A
5693085 Buirge et al. Dec 1997 A
5700286 Tartaglia et al. Dec 1997 A
5707385 Williams Jan 1998 A
5716981 Hunter et al. Feb 1998 A
5725567 Wolf et al. Mar 1998 A
5726297 Gryaznov et al. Mar 1998 A
5728751 Patnaik Mar 1998 A
5733925 Kunz et al. Mar 1998 A
5741881 Patnaik Apr 1998 A
5756457 Wang et al. May 1998 A
5756476 Epstein et al. May 1998 A
5766710 Turnlund et al. Jun 1998 A
5800516 Fine et al. Sep 1998 A
5811447 Kunz et al. Sep 1998 A
4739762 Palmaz Oct 1998 B1
5824049 Ragheb et al. Oct 1998 A
5830178 Jones et al. Nov 1998 A
5830461 Billiar Nov 1998 A
5830879 Isner Nov 1998 A
5833651 Donovan et al. Nov 1998 A
5834582 Sinclair et al. Nov 1998 A
5837313 Ding et al. Nov 1998 A
5837835 Gryaznov et al. Nov 1998 A
5851508 Greff et al. Dec 1998 A
5854207 Lee et al. Dec 1998 A
5855618 Patnaik et al. Jan 1999 A
5858746 Hubbell et al. Jan 1999 A
5865814 Tuch Feb 1999 A
5873904 Ragheb et al. Feb 1999 A
5874165 Drumheller Feb 1999 A
5876743 Ibsen et al. Mar 1999 A
5877263 Patnaik et al. Mar 1999 A
5879713 Roth et al. Mar 1999 A
5891192 Murayama et al. Apr 1999 A
5897955 Drumheller Apr 1999 A
5914182 Drumheller Jun 1999 A
5916870 Lee et al. Jun 1999 A
5942209 Leavitt et al. Aug 1999 A
5948428 Lee et al. Sep 1999 A
5957975 Lafont et al. Sep 1999 A
5965720 Gryaznov et al. Oct 1999 A
5971954 Conway et al. Oct 1999 A
5980564 Stinson Nov 1999 A
5980928 Terry Nov 1999 A
5980972 Ding Nov 1999 A
5981568 Kunz et al. Nov 1999 A
5997468 Wolff et al. Dec 1999 A
6015541 Greff et al. Jan 2000 A
6042875 Ding et al. Mar 2000 A
6048964 Lee et al. Apr 2000 A
6051648 Rhee et al. Apr 2000 A
6056993 Leidner et al. May 2000 A
6060451 DiMaio et al. May 2000 A
6071266 Kelley Jun 2000 A
6074659 Kunz et al. Jun 2000 A
6080177 Igaki et al. Jun 2000 A
6080488 Hostettler et al. Jun 2000 A
6093463 Thakrar Jul 2000 A
6096070 Ragheb et al. Aug 2000 A
6096525 Patnaik Aug 2000 A
6099562 Ding et al. Aug 2000 A
6103230 Billiar et al. Aug 2000 A
6107416 Patnaik et al. Aug 2000 A
6110188 Narciso, Jr. Aug 2000 A
6113629 Ken Sep 2000 A
6117979 Hendriks et al. Sep 2000 A
6120536 Ding et al. Sep 2000 A
6120904 Hostettler et al. Sep 2000 A
6121027 Clapper et al. Sep 2000 A
6127173 Eckstein et al. Oct 2000 A
6129761 Hubbell Oct 2000 A
6153252 Hossainy et al. Nov 2000 A
4776337 Palmaz Dec 2000 B1
6159951 Karpeisky et al. Dec 2000 A
6165212 Dereume et al. Dec 2000 A
6166130 Rhee et al. Dec 2000 A
6169170 Gryaznov et al. Jan 2001 B1
6171609 Kunz Jan 2001 B1
6174330 Stinson Jan 2001 B1
6177523 Reich et al. Jan 2001 B1
6224626 Steinke May 2001 B1
6228845 Donovan et al. May 2001 B1
6245103 Stinson Jun 2001 B1
6251135 Stinson et al. Jun 2001 B1
6251142 Bernacca et al. Jun 2001 B1
4733665 Palmaz Jan 2002 C2
6350277 Kocur Feb 2002 B1
6379379 Wang Apr 2002 B1
6395029 Levy May 2002 B1
6527801 Dutta Mar 2003 B1
6685928 Uhrich Feb 2004 B2
7122615 Uhrich Oct 2006 B1
7390333 Dutta Jun 2008 B2
7470283 Dutta Dec 2008 B2
7875283 Hossainy et al. Jan 2011 B2
8109994 Dutta Feb 2012 B2
20010047185 Satz Nov 2001 A1
20040138260 Natchus et al. Jul 2004 A1
20060136051 Furst et al. Jun 2006 A1
20120116501 Dutta May 2012 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (34)
Number Date Country
44 07 079 Sep 1994 DE
0 108 171 May 1984 EP
0 144 534 Jun 1985 EP
0 364 787 Apr 1990 EP
0 397 500 Nov 1990 EP
0 464 755 Jan 1992 EP
0 493 788 Jul 1992 EP
0 554 082 Aug 1993 EP
0 578 998 Jan 1994 EP
0 604 022 Jun 1994 EP
0 621 017 Oct 1994 EP
0 623 354 Nov 1994 EP
0 665 023 Aug 1995 EP
0 970 711 Jan 2000 EP
2 247 696 Mar 1992 GB
2001-515934 Sep 2001 JP
WO 8903232 Apr 1989 WO
WO 9001969 Mar 1990 WO
WO 9004982 May 1990 WO
WO 9006094 Jun 1990 WO
WO 9117744 Nov 1991 WO
WO 9117789 Nov 1991 WO
WO 9210218 Jun 1992 WO
WO 9306792 Apr 1993 WO
WO 9529647 Nov 1995 WO
WO9912990 Mar 1999 WO
WO 9934750 Jul 1999 WO
WO 0012147 Mar 2000 WO
WO 0044309 Aug 2000 WO
WO 0064506 Nov 2000 WO
WO 0074744 Dec 2000 WO
WO 0101890 Jan 2001 WO
WO 0167990 Sep 2001 WO
WO 03080147 Oct 2003 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (16)
Entry
A Notification of Refusal issued by JPO on Oct. 13, 2009, in connection with Appl. No. 2003-577971, 3 pgs.
Translation of a Notification of Refusal issued by JPO on Oct. 13, 2009, in connection with Appl. No. 2003-577971, 2 pgs.
Bull, Parylene Coating for Medical Applications, Medical Product Manufacturing News (Mar. 1993).
Casper et al., Fiber-Reinforced Absorbable Composite for Orthopedic Surgery, Polymeric Materials Science and Engineering, 53:497-501 (1985).
Devanathan et al., Polymeric Conformal Coatings for Implantable Electronic Devices, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, vol. BME-27(11):671-675 (1980).
Hahn et al., Biocompatibility of Glow-Discharge-Polymerized Films and Vacuum-Deposited Parylene, J Applied Polymer Sci, 38:55-64 (1984).
Hahn et al., Glow Discharge Polymers as Coatings for Implanted Devices, ISA, pp. 109-111 (1981).
Kelley et al., Totally Resorbable High-Strength Composite Material, Advances in Biomedical Polymers, 35:75-85 (1987).
Kubies et al., Microdomain Structure In Polylactide-block-poly(ethylene oxide) Copolymer Films, Biomaterials 21:529-536 (2000).
Muller et al., Advances in Coronary Angioplasty: Endovascular Stents, Coron Arter Dis, 1(4):438-448 (Jul./Aug. 1990).
Nichols et al., Electrical Insulation of Implantable Devices by Composite Polymer Coatings, ISA Transactions, 26(4):15-18 (1987).
Schatz, A View of Vascular Stents, Circulation, 79(2):445-457 (Feb. 1989).
Schmidt et al., Long-Term Implants of Parylene-C Coated Microelectrodes, Med & Biol Eng & Comp, 26(1):96-101 (Jan. 1988).
Hanes et al., “Synthesis and Characterization of Degradable Anhydride-co-imide Terpolymers Containing Tremellitylimido-L-tyrosine: Novel Polymers for Drug Delivery,” Macromolecules 1996, 29, pp. 5279-5287.
Langer, “New Methods of Drug Delivery,” Science, vol. 249, Sep. 28, 1990, Articles pp. 1527-1533.
Middleton et al., “Synthetic Biodegradable Polymer as Medical Devices”, published in MDDI Magazine (1998) downloaded from www.mddionline.com/print/3282 on Mar. 16, 2011, 9 pgs.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20120116501 A1 May 2012 US
Divisions (2)
Number Date Country
Parent 11968543 Jan 2008 US
Child 13350669 US
Parent 09548533 Apr 2000 US
Child 10340052 US
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 10340052 Jan 2003 US
Child 11968543 US