The present invention generally relates to expandable intraluminal vascular grafts, most often referred to as stents, and more particularly pertains to biodegradable stents which completely or partially degrade or are bioabsorbed over a period of time after deployment.
Stents are used to maintain the patency of vessels in the body. They are typically advanced through the vasculature to the deployment site while in a contracted state where they are then expanded to engage the vessel walls and thereby establish a flowpath therethrough. A stent can be moved along a guide wire previously positioned in the vessel and then expanded by the inflation of a balloon about which such stent is disposed. Subsequent deflation of the balloon and removal of it along with the guidewire leaves the stent in place and locked in its expanded state. It has been found that the continued exposure of a stent to blood can lead to undesirable thrombus formation, and the presence of a stent in a blood vessel can over time cause the blood vessel wall to weaken, which creates the potential for an arterial rupture or the formation of aneurisms. A stent can also become so overgrown by tissue after its implantation that its usefulness may be substantially diminished while its continued presence may cause a variety of problems or complications.
In certain situations it is therefore desirable for the stent to be biodegradable or bioabsorbable so as to curtail the adverse risks that would otherwise be associated with the stent's continued presence once its usefulness of the treatment site has ceased or has at least become substantially diminished. To such end, some stents have heretofore been wholly constructed of materials that are biodegradable or bioabsorbable. It is of course necessary to select a material that while biodegradable is nonetheless biocompatible and additionally, has the physical properties necessary to properly serve its function as a stent. Such physical properties include, among others, sufficient strength to support the loads a particular stent is to be subjected to in its function as a splint, the radial flexibility necessary for it to undergo expansion, longitudinal flexibility to allow it to be advanced through a contorted vasculature and conceivably to adapt to a non-linear deployment site.
Such characteristics have heretofore been achieved with the use of certain polymer materials such as polylactic acid, polylactic acid-glycolic acid copolymer, and polycaprolactone. However, all such previously known biodegradable/bioabsorbable stents exhibit bulk erosion and are as a consequence prone to break up into large particles as the matrix breaks down. Additionally, such materials have also been used as stent coatings to gradually release pharmacological agents that are infused throughout the coating. However, the bulk erosion to which such materials are inherently prone to can cause the coating to flake off or otherwise become detached. Should such large particles actually become dislodged before becoming completely degraded, they could be washed downstream and cause emboli.
A biodegradable stent is therefore needed that is initially capable of providing the necessary structural support to a body lumen and then gradually and completely degrades or is absorbed in a manner that precludes a break-up into large particles. Similarly, a biodegradable coating is needed that is not prone to flaking or breaking up into large particles. By preventing the break-up of the stent or of the stent coating into large particles that may subsequently be swept downstream, the potential for embolic complications is thereby avoided.
The present invention provides a stent or optionally, a stent coating which degrades in a very controlled and uniform manner so as to substantially preclude the possibility of sizeable particles becoming detached and possibly causing embolic problems downstream. This is achieved by employing a material in the construction of the entire stent or in the coating of the stent that erodes in a very controlled manner. Such material is selected for its strength characteristics as well as its tendency to erode from the surface inwardly rather than being subject to bulk erosion. By incorporating pharmacological agents within the material, the stent or stent coating not only eventually vanishes from within the body lumen in which it was implanted but additionally dispenses the incorporated drug in a gradual manner.
Materials that exhibit the desired surface eroding characteristics without being subject to bulk erosion include polymers wherein the degradation rate of the matrix is faster than the rate of water penetration into the interior of the polymeric mass. Such polymers are hydrophobic but have water-labile linkages interconnecting the monomers. The hydrophobic property precludes water from penetrating into the interior of the polymer while water labile linkages nonetheless subject the surface to gradual erosion. As a result, the stent gradually degrades from the surface inwardly, substantially without the risk of large particles becoming dislodged.
While hydrophobic polymers with water-labile linkages are known, their limited strength and processing capabilities have restricted their usage to passive devices that neither perform a structural function nor are subject to stress or distortion. Drugs infused throughout such material implanted in the body in the form of a tablet or other shape are gradually released as the polymer degrades. As such, these surface degrading polymers have functioned as an effective drug delivery vehicle. The use of such polymers in stent applications has however been precluded as they are unable to support a lumen wall or remain attached to a stent as it undergoes deformation during its expansion.
The materials employed in either wholly forming a stent or in coating a stent in accordance with the present invention include hydrophobic polymers having water-liable linkages connecting the monomers that are fortified with the incorporation of ester or imide bonds. Examples of such polymers include polyanhydrides and polyorthoesters. Additionally, by employing such polymers in stent applications, a single device can be called upon to provide the necessary support to a body lumen and simultaneously dispense a pharmacological agent in a controlled manner.
These and other features and advantages of the present invention will become apparent from the following detailed description of a preferred embodiments which illustrate by way of example the principles of the invention.
The stent of the present invention is employed to support or otherwise treat a targeted site within the vasculature. Such stent is introduced into the vasculature, advanced therethrough to the deployment site and expanded using conventional techniques and delivery systems. Once in position and subject to the continuous flow of blood therethrough, it gradually degrades, substantially without the risk inherent in previously known biodegradable stents or stents with biodegradable coatings of breaking up into or releasing sizeable particles that may be swept downstream and cause emboli.
The material employed in the manufacture of the stent of the present invention is a polymer that is simultaneously hydrophobic and has water-labile linkages interconnecting its monomers that are further fortified by ester or imide bonds. The hydrophobic nature of the polymer precludes the incursion of water into its interior while the water-labile bonds that are exposed on its surface nonetheless cause the polymer to degrade. Degradation thereby exclusively progresses from the material's surface inwardly to yield a much more uniform degradation rate and to preclude bulk erosion. The incorporation of the imide or ester bonds serves to impart sufficient strength to the material to enable it to provide the support that is required of a stent. Alternatively, if the material is used as stent coating, the incorporation of the imide or ester bonds impart sufficient strength to the material to prevent it from flaking off or otherwise becoming detached as the underlying stent undergoes the distortion attendant its being expanded by for example the inflation of a balloon.
Many of the stent's ultimate performance characteristics are controllable by the appropriate selection of the various dimensional parameters of the stent. Increasing the dimensions of various structural elements of the stent will generally serve to increase strength and decrease flexibility. Such effect would result from both an increase in the width or in the wall thickness of the stent's structural elements. The time period in which the stent would become totally degraded or absorbed is a function of the wall thickness of the various elements while the degradation rate is a function of the total area exposed to contact with the blood. By for example selecting a stent configuration which employs a large number of relatively narrow spine and strut elements to achieve a particular level of strength, the time in which the stent degrades when subjected to the blood flow can be substantially accelerated. Conversely, a stent configuration in which a relatively few, wide structural elements are employed causes the degradation rate to be somewhat retarded.
The stent's ultimate performance characteristics are of course also controllable by the appropriate selection of chemical variables. For example, the number of imide or ester bonds that are incorporated in the polymer material not only affects the ultimate strength and flexibility characteristics of the stent, but also has an effect on the rate at which the material degrades when subjected to blood flow. An increased bond content enhances strength, decreases flexibility and increases degradation time. The specific requirements of a particular application will ultimately determine the optimal combination of the stent configuration, wall thickness and ester or imide bond content.
Polymers that satisfy the above-described requirements include polyanhydrides and polyorthoesters. Representative examples of polyanhydride polymers suitable for use in the construction of a stent or formulation of a stent coating in accordance with the present invention include anhydride-co-imide ter polymers containing trimellitylimido-L-tyrosine, sebacic acid (SA) and 1,3 bis(carboxyphenoxy)propane. Other examples of suitable polyanhydrides include poly(fatty acid-sebacic acid) synthesized from erucic acid and sebacic anhydride p(EAD:SA) and poly(L-lactic acid-co-L-aspartic acid). Representative examples of polyorthoester polymers suitable for use in the construction of a stent or formulation of a stent coating in accordance with the present invention include poly(4-hydroxy-L-proline ester), poly(1, 10 decanediol-1, 10 decanediol dilactide) and poly(1, 2, 6 hexanetriol-trimethylorthoacetate). An ester or imide content of 20%-40% has been found to be effective to provide sufficient strength for a stent application.
The process for forming a polymer stent is well known in the art. A stent of the present invention is formed by first causing the appropriate reagents to react to form the desired polyanhydride or polyorthoester composition. During copolymer synthesis, the imide content of such composition is increased by incorporating higher imide containing monomers like trimellitylimido-L-tyrosine. Increasing imide content results in higher strength material. Flexibility of polyanhydrides like p(EAD:SA) can be increased by increasing the percentage of erucic acid dimer (EAD) during polymer synthesis. The ester content of such composition is increased by incorporating higher ester containing monomers such as L-proline ester or trimethyl orthoacetate.
Selected pharmacological agents can be added to the reagents so as to incorporate such materials throughout the polymer to thereby provide for the gradual dispensation of the drug over the service life of the stent. The blending may be accomplished either in solution or in a melt state. Drugs such as for example heparin or other proteins can readily be added to the reactants before or during the polymerization process. Alternatively, some drugs may be infused throughout the polymer after polymerization is completed. If desired, the drug may be applied to the surface of the cured polymer to cause the entire dosage to be released shortly after implantation.
The stent may be formed by any of a number of well known methods including the extrusion of the polymer into the shape of a tube. Preselected patterns of voids are then formed into the tube in order to define a plurality of spines and struts that impart a degree of flexibility and expandability to the tube.
Alternatively, the drug loaded polymer may applied to the selected surfaces of a stent formed of for example stainless steel or Nitinol. In order to coat all of the surfaces of the stent, the stent is immersed in the molten polymer. Alternatively, the polymer may be extruded in the form of a tube which is then codrawn with a tube of stainless steel or Nitinol. By codrawing two tubes of the polymer with the metal tube, one positioned about the exterior of the metal tube and another positioned within such metal tube, a tube having multi-layered walls is formed. Subsequent perforation of the tube walls to define a preselected pattern of spines and struts imparts the desired flexibility and expandability to the tube to create a stent.
While a particular form of the invention has been illustrated and described, it will also be apparent to those skilled in the art that various modifications can be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. Accordingly, it is not intended that the invention be limited except by the appended claims.
The present application is a divisional application of U.S. application Ser. No. 11/968,543, which was filed on Jan. 2, 2008, and issued as U.S. Pat. No. 8,109,994, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 10/340,052, which was filed on Jan. 10, 2003, and issued as U.S. Pat. No. 7,390,333, which is a divisional of U.S. application Ser. No. 09/548,533, which was filed on Apr. 13, 2000, and issued as U.S. Pat. No. 6,527,801. The teachings in each of the aforementioned patent applications and patent are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3407164 | Schmidt | Oct 1968 | A |
3839743 | Schwarcz | Oct 1974 | A |
3900632 | Robinson | Aug 1975 | A |
4110497 | Hoel | Aug 1978 | A |
4321711 | Mano | Mar 1982 | A |
4346028 | Griffith | Aug 1982 | A |
4633873 | Dumican et al. | Jan 1987 | A |
4656083 | Hoffman et al. | Apr 1987 | A |
4718907 | Karwoski et al. | Jan 1988 | A |
4722335 | Vilasi | Feb 1988 | A |
4723549 | Wholey et al. | Feb 1988 | A |
4732152 | Wallstén et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
4733665 | Palmaz | Mar 1988 | A |
4739762 | Palmaz | Apr 1988 | A |
4740207 | Kreamer | Apr 1988 | A |
4743252 | Martin, Jr. et al. | May 1988 | A |
4768507 | Fischell et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
4776337 | Palmaz | Oct 1988 | A |
4816339 | Tu et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
4850999 | Planck | Jul 1989 | A |
4877030 | Beck et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
4878906 | Lindemann et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
4879135 | Greco et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
4902289 | Yannas | Feb 1990 | A |
4977901 | Ofstead | Dec 1990 | A |
4994298 | Yasuda | Feb 1991 | A |
5019090 | Pinchuk | May 1991 | A |
5028597 | Kodama et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5059211 | Stack et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5062829 | Pryor et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5084065 | Weldon et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5085629 | Goldberg et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
5100429 | Sinofsky et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5108755 | Daniels et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5112457 | Marchant | May 1992 | A |
5123917 | Lee | Jun 1992 | A |
5156623 | Hakamatsuka et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5163951 | Pinchuk et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5163952 | Froix | Nov 1992 | A |
5163958 | Pinchuk | Nov 1992 | A |
5167614 | Tessmann et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5192311 | King et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5197977 | Hoffman, Jr. et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5234456 | Silvestrini | Aug 1993 | A |
5234457 | Andersen | Aug 1993 | A |
5236447 | Kubo et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5240963 | Domb et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5279594 | Jackson | Jan 1994 | A |
5282860 | Matsuno et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5289831 | Bosley | Mar 1994 | A |
5290271 | Jernberg | Mar 1994 | A |
5306286 | Stack et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5306294 | Winston et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5328471 | Slepian | Jul 1994 | A |
5330500 | Song | Jul 1994 | A |
5342348 | Kaplan | Aug 1994 | A |
5342395 | Jarrett et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5342621 | Eury | Aug 1994 | A |
5356433 | Rowland et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5383925 | Schmitt | Jan 1995 | A |
5385580 | Schmitt | Jan 1995 | A |
5389106 | Tower | Feb 1995 | A |
5441515 | Khosravi et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5443458 | Eury | Aug 1995 | A |
5455040 | Marchant | Oct 1995 | A |
5464650 | Berg et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5486591 | Domb et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5500013 | Buscemi et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5502158 | Sinclair et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5514379 | Weissleder et al. | May 1996 | A |
5527337 | Stack et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5554120 | Chen et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5578073 | Haimovich et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5591607 | Gryaznov et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5593403 | Buscemi | Jan 1997 | A |
5599301 | Jacobs et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5599922 | Gryaznov et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5605696 | Eury et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5629077 | Turnlund et al. | May 1997 | A |
5631135 | Gryaznov et al. | May 1997 | A |
5637113 | Tartaglia et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5667767 | Greff et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5670558 | Onishi et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5693085 | Buirge et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5700286 | Tartaglia et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5707385 | Williams | Jan 1998 | A |
5716981 | Hunter et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5725567 | Wolf et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5726297 | Gryaznov et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5728751 | Patnaik | Mar 1998 | A |
5733925 | Kunz et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5741881 | Patnaik | Apr 1998 | A |
5756457 | Wang et al. | May 1998 | A |
5756476 | Epstein et al. | May 1998 | A |
5766710 | Turnlund et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5800516 | Fine et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5811447 | Kunz et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
4739762 | Palmaz | Oct 1998 | B1 |
5824049 | Ragheb et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5830178 | Jones et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5830461 | Billiar | Nov 1998 | A |
5830879 | Isner | Nov 1998 | A |
5833651 | Donovan et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5834582 | Sinclair et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5837313 | Ding et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5837835 | Gryaznov et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5851508 | Greff et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5854207 | Lee et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5855618 | Patnaik et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5858746 | Hubbell et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5865814 | Tuch | Feb 1999 | A |
5873904 | Ragheb et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5874165 | Drumheller | Feb 1999 | A |
5876743 | Ibsen et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5877263 | Patnaik et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5879713 | Roth et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5891192 | Murayama et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5897955 | Drumheller | Apr 1999 | A |
5914182 | Drumheller | Jun 1999 | A |
5916870 | Lee et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5942209 | Leavitt et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5948428 | Lee et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5957975 | Lafont et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5965720 | Gryaznov et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5971954 | Conway et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5980564 | Stinson | Nov 1999 | A |
5980928 | Terry | Nov 1999 | A |
5980972 | Ding | Nov 1999 | A |
5981568 | Kunz et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5997468 | Wolff et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6015541 | Greff et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6042875 | Ding et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6048964 | Lee et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6051648 | Rhee et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6056993 | Leidner et al. | May 2000 | A |
6060451 | DiMaio et al. | May 2000 | A |
6071266 | Kelley | Jun 2000 | A |
6074659 | Kunz et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6080177 | Igaki et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6080488 | Hostettler et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6093463 | Thakrar | Jul 2000 | A |
6096070 | Ragheb et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6096525 | Patnaik | Aug 2000 | A |
6099562 | Ding et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6103230 | Billiar et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6107416 | Patnaik et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6110188 | Narciso, Jr. | Aug 2000 | A |
6113629 | Ken | Sep 2000 | A |
6117979 | Hendriks et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6120536 | Ding et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6120904 | Hostettler et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6121027 | Clapper et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6127173 | Eckstein et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6129761 | Hubbell | Oct 2000 | A |
6153252 | Hossainy et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
4776337 | Palmaz | Dec 2000 | B1 |
6159951 | Karpeisky et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6165212 | Dereume et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6166130 | Rhee et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6169170 | Gryaznov et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6171609 | Kunz | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6174330 | Stinson | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6177523 | Reich et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6224626 | Steinke | May 2001 | B1 |
6228845 | Donovan et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6245103 | Stinson | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6251135 | Stinson et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6251142 | Bernacca et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
4733665 | Palmaz | Jan 2002 | C2 |
6350277 | Kocur | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6379379 | Wang | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6395029 | Levy | May 2002 | B1 |
6527801 | Dutta | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6685928 | Uhrich | Feb 2004 | B2 |
7122615 | Uhrich | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7390333 | Dutta | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7470283 | Dutta | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7875283 | Hossainy et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
8109994 | Dutta | Feb 2012 | B2 |
20010047185 | Satz | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20040138260 | Natchus et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20060136051 | Furst et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20120116501 | Dutta | May 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
44 07 079 | Sep 1994 | DE |
0 108 171 | May 1984 | EP |
0 144 534 | Jun 1985 | EP |
0 364 787 | Apr 1990 | EP |
0 397 500 | Nov 1990 | EP |
0 464 755 | Jan 1992 | EP |
0 493 788 | Jul 1992 | EP |
0 554 082 | Aug 1993 | EP |
0 578 998 | Jan 1994 | EP |
0 604 022 | Jun 1994 | EP |
0 621 017 | Oct 1994 | EP |
0 623 354 | Nov 1994 | EP |
0 665 023 | Aug 1995 | EP |
0 970 711 | Jan 2000 | EP |
2 247 696 | Mar 1992 | GB |
2001-515934 | Sep 2001 | JP |
WO 8903232 | Apr 1989 | WO |
WO 9001969 | Mar 1990 | WO |
WO 9004982 | May 1990 | WO |
WO 9006094 | Jun 1990 | WO |
WO 9117744 | Nov 1991 | WO |
WO 9117789 | Nov 1991 | WO |
WO 9210218 | Jun 1992 | WO |
WO 9306792 | Apr 1993 | WO |
WO 9529647 | Nov 1995 | WO |
WO9912990 | Mar 1999 | WO |
WO 9934750 | Jul 1999 | WO |
WO 0012147 | Mar 2000 | WO |
WO 0044309 | Aug 2000 | WO |
WO 0064506 | Nov 2000 | WO |
WO 0074744 | Dec 2000 | WO |
WO 0101890 | Jan 2001 | WO |
WO 0167990 | Sep 2001 | WO |
WO 03080147 | Oct 2003 | WO |
Entry |
---|
A Notification of Refusal issued by JPO on Oct. 13, 2009, in connection with Appl. No. 2003-577971, 3 pgs. |
Translation of a Notification of Refusal issued by JPO on Oct. 13, 2009, in connection with Appl. No. 2003-577971, 2 pgs. |
Bull, Parylene Coating for Medical Applications, Medical Product Manufacturing News (Mar. 1993). |
Casper et al., Fiber-Reinforced Absorbable Composite for Orthopedic Surgery, Polymeric Materials Science and Engineering, 53:497-501 (1985). |
Devanathan et al., Polymeric Conformal Coatings for Implantable Electronic Devices, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, vol. BME-27(11):671-675 (1980). |
Hahn et al., Biocompatibility of Glow-Discharge-Polymerized Films and Vacuum-Deposited Parylene, J Applied Polymer Sci, 38:55-64 (1984). |
Hahn et al., Glow Discharge Polymers as Coatings for Implanted Devices, ISA, pp. 109-111 (1981). |
Kelley et al., Totally Resorbable High-Strength Composite Material, Advances in Biomedical Polymers, 35:75-85 (1987). |
Kubies et al., Microdomain Structure In Polylactide-block-poly(ethylene oxide) Copolymer Films, Biomaterials 21:529-536 (2000). |
Muller et al., Advances in Coronary Angioplasty: Endovascular Stents, Coron Arter Dis, 1(4):438-448 (Jul./Aug. 1990). |
Nichols et al., Electrical Insulation of Implantable Devices by Composite Polymer Coatings, ISA Transactions, 26(4):15-18 (1987). |
Schatz, A View of Vascular Stents, Circulation, 79(2):445-457 (Feb. 1989). |
Schmidt et al., Long-Term Implants of Parylene-C Coated Microelectrodes, Med & Biol Eng & Comp, 26(1):96-101 (Jan. 1988). |
Hanes et al., “Synthesis and Characterization of Degradable Anhydride-co-imide Terpolymers Containing Tremellitylimido-L-tyrosine: Novel Polymers for Drug Delivery,” Macromolecules 1996, 29, pp. 5279-5287. |
Langer, “New Methods of Drug Delivery,” Science, vol. 249, Sep. 28, 1990, Articles pp. 1527-1533. |
Middleton et al., “Synthetic Biodegradable Polymer as Medical Devices”, published in MDDI Magazine (1998) downloaded from www.mddionline.com/print/3282 on Mar. 16, 2011, 9 pgs. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120116501 A1 | May 2012 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11968543 | Jan 2008 | US |
Child | 13350669 | US | |
Parent | 09548533 | Apr 2000 | US |
Child | 10340052 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10340052 | Jan 2003 | US |
Child | 11968543 | US |