The present embodiments relate to implantable medical devices, and more particularly to an implantable medical device for the repair of a damaged endoluminal valve, such as an aortic valve.
The aortic valve functions as a one-way valve between the heart and the rest of the body. Blood is pumped from the left ventricle of the heart, through the aortic valve, and into the aorta, which in turn supplies blood to the body. Between heart contractions the aortic valve closes, preventing blood from flowing backwards into the heart.
Damage to the aortic valve can occur from a congenital defect, the natural aging process, and from infection or scarring. Over time, calcium may build up around the aortic valve causing the valve not to open and close properly. Certain types of damage may cause the valve to “leak,” resulting in “aortic insufficiency” or “aortic regurgitation.” Aortic regurgitation causes extra workload for the heart, and can ultimately result in weakening of the heart muscle and eventual heart failure.
After the aortic valve becomes sufficiently damaged, the valve may need to be replaced to prevent heart failure and death. One current approach involves the use of a balloon-expandable stent to place an artificial valve at the site of the defective aortic valve. Another current approach involves the positioning of an artificial valve at the site of the aortic valve using a self-expanding stent. The normal aortic valve functions well because it is suspended from above through its attachment to the walls of the coronary sinus in between the coronary orifices, and it has leaflets of the perfect size and shape to fill the space in the annulus. However, these features may be difficult to replicate with an artificial valve. The size of the implantation site depends on the unpredictable effects of the balloon dilation of a heavily calcified native valve and its annulus. Poor valve function with a persistent gradient or regurgitation through the valve may result. In addition, different radial force considerations may be needed at the different locations for the prosthesis to optimally interact with a patient's anatomy. Still further, it is important to reduce or prevent in-folding or “prolapse” of an artificial valve after implantation, particularly during diastolic pressures.
The present embodiments provide a medical device for implantation in a patient. The medical device comprises a stent and a valve. The stent comprises a proximal region comprising a cylindrical shape having a first outer diameter when the stent is in an expanded state, and a distal region comprising a cylindrical shape having a second outer diameter when the stent is in the expanded state. The second outer diameter is greater than the first outer diameter.
In one embodiment, a plurality of closed cells are disposed around the perimeter of the proximal region of the stent, and another plurality of closed cells are disposed around the perimeter of the distal region of the stent. An overall length of each of the closed cells of the proximal region of the stent is less than an overall length of each of the closed cells of the distal region of the stent when the stent is in the expanded state.
In one embodiment, the stent further comprises a tapered region disposed between the proximal and distal regions. The tapered region transitions the stent from the first diameter to the second diameter. The tapered region further comprises a plurality of closed cells. An overall length of each of the closed cells of the tapered region is greater than the overall length of each of the closed cells of the proximal region and less than the overall length of each of the closed cells of the distal region when the stent is in the expanded state.
A proximal region of the valve is at least partially positioned within the proximal region of the stent, and the distal region of the valve is at least partially positioned within one of the tapered and distal regions of the stent. When implanted, the proximal region of the stent and the proximal region of the valve are aligned with a native valve, and the distal region of the valve is distally spaced-apart from the native valve.
Other systems, methods, features and advantages of the invention will be, or will become, apparent to one with skill in the art upon examination of the following figures and detailed description. It is intended that all such additional systems, methods, features and advantages be within the scope of the invention, and be encompassed by the following claims.
The invention can be better understood with reference to the following drawings and description. The components in the figures are not necessarily to scale, emphasis instead being placed upon illustrating the principles of the invention. Moreover, in the figures, like referenced numerals designate corresponding parts throughout the different views.
In the present application, the term “proximal” refers to a direction that is generally closest to the heart during a medical procedure, while the term “distal” refers to a direction that is furthest from the heart during a medical procedure.
Referring now to
The stent structure 20 has a collapsed delivery state and an expanded deployed state, and generally comprises a proximal region 30, a tapered region 50, and a distal region 70, as shown in
The stent structure 20 may be manufactured from a continuous cylinder into which a pattern may be cut by a laser or by chemical etching to produce slits in the wall of the cylinder. The resulting structure may then be heat set to give it a desired final configuration. As shown in
The proximal region 30 of the stent structure 20 comprises a generally cylindrical shape having an expanded outer diameter d1. The proximal region 30 is configured to be disposed at least partially within the aortic sinus, as shown in
The proximal region 30 of the stent structure 20 may comprise multiple adjacent proximal apices 31. Each proximal apex 31 may comprise an end region 32 having an integral barb 33 formed therein, as shown in
Referring still to
The first and second angled strut segments 36 and 37 each generally comprise a length L1, and each are generally disposed at an angle α1 relative to a longitudinal axis L of the stent structure 20, as shown in
In this example, the length L1 of the first and second angled strut segments 36 and 37 is greater than the length L2 of the third and fourth angled strut segments 38 and 39. In one embodiment, the length L1 may be about 1.5 to about 4.0 times greater than the length L2.
Moreover, a cross-sectional area of the first and second angled strut segments 36 and 37 may be greater than a cross-sectional area of the third and fourth angled strut segments 38 and 39. In one embodiment, the cross-sectional area of the first and second angled strut segments 36 and 37 is about 4 times greater than the cross-sectional area of the third and fourth angled strut segments 38 and 39. The increased cross-sectional area of the first and second angled strut segments 36 and 37 causes these segments to primarily provide the radial force within the closed cells 35, while the third and fourth angled strut segments 38 and 39 are mainly intended for connecting adjacent closed cells 35 and 55a, instead of providing significant radial force.
Further, in this example, the angle α2 of the third and fourth angled strut segments 38 and 39 is greater than the angle α1 of the first and second angled strut segments 36 and 37. Since the first and second angled strut segments 36 and 37 are primarily providing the radial force, the angle α1 is selected to achieve the desired radial force, while as noted above, the third and fourth angled strut segments 38 and 39 are mainly intended for connecting adjacent closed cells 35 and 55a, and therefore yield a different angle α2 for this different primary purpose. In one embodiment, the angle α2 may be about 1.2 to 4.0 times greater than the angle α1.
Overall, given the relative lengths and angle configurations described above, each closed cell 35 comprises a generally spade-shaped configuration, as shown in
The pattern of angled strut segments 36-39 may be repeated around the circumference of the proximal region 30 of the stent structure 20. In this manner, the stent structure 20 may be formed into a continuous, generally cylindrical shape. In one example, ten proximal apices 31 and ten closed cells 35 are disposed around the circumference of the proximal region 30, although greater or fewer proximal apices and closed cells may be provided to vary the diameter and/or radial force characteristics of the stent.
The proximal region 30 may be flared slightly relative to the longitudinal axis L. In one example, a proximal end of each apex 31 may be bowed outward relative to a distal end of the same apex 31. Such a flaring may facilitate engagement with the aortic sinus when implanted.
Referring still to
In one example, four angled strut segments 56, 57, 58 and 59 form one closed cell 55b, as shown in
In this example, the length L4 of the first and second angled strut segments 56 and 57 is greater than the length L5 of the third and fourth angled strut segments 58 and 59. In one embodiment, the length L4 may be about 1.1 to about 4 times greater than the length L5.
Further, in this example, the total length L6 of the closed cell 55b of the tapered region 50 is greater than the total length L3 of the closed cell 35 of the proximal region 30, as shown in
The distal region 70 similarly comprises a plurality of closed cells. In this example, two different closed cells 75a and 75b are provided along the length of the distal region 70. The closed cells 75a and 75b may comprise a different shape relative to one another, as shown in
In one example, the most distal closed cell 75b comprises four angled strut segments 76, 77, 78 and 79, as shown in
Further, a barbed region 80 having a barb 83 is disposed between the angled strut segments, as shown in
In this example, the length L7 of the first and second angled strut segments 76 and 77 is greater than the length L9 of the third and fourth angled strut segments 78 and 79. In one embodiment, the length L7 may be about 1.1 to about 4.0 times greater than the length L9.
Further, in this example, the total length L10 of the closed cell 75b of the distal region 70 is greater than the total length L6 of the closed cell 55b of the tapered region 50, which in turn is greater than the total length L3 of the closed cell 35 of the proximal region 30, as shown in
Advantageously, since the lengths of individual closed cells generally increase along the stent structure 20 from the proximal end 22 to the distal end 24, the forces imposed by the stent structure 20 along different regions may be varied for a patient's anatomy. Radial force and stiffness are a function of the individual cell lengths. Therefore, in the example of an aortic valve replacement, a relatively short length L3 of the closed cell 35 of the proximal region 30 yields a relatively high radial force imposed upon the aortic sinus to allow for an enhanced and rigid attachment at this location. Conversely, a relatively long length L10 of the closed cell 75b of the distal region 70 yields a relatively low radial force imposed upon the ascending aorta, thereby facilitating a flexible contour at the distal region 70 that does not adversely impact the ascending aorta 105.
Additionally, radial force and stiffness are a function of the strut angles. In the example of
Further, an increased strut width may be provided at the proximal region 30 to promote a higher radial force relative to the strut width at the distal region 70. In sum, the stent structure 20 has different radial force properties at its proximal and distal regions 30 and 70 that beneficially interact with their associated regions into which they are implanted, e.g., the aortic sinus and the ascending aorta, respectively.
In one embodiment, the lengths of individual cells may always increase relative to one another moving in a proximal to distal direction, i.e., each closed cell has an overall length that is greater than a length of every other closed cell that is disposed proximally thereof. In other embodiments, adjacent cells may comprise about the same length, or a proximal cell may comprise a lesser length than an adjacent distal cell. Therefore, while the lengths of individual angled strut segments generally increase in a proximal to distal direction, it is possible that some of the individual angled strut segments of a more distal region may be smaller than a more proximally oriented region.
Expansion of the stent structure 20 is at least partly provided by the angled strut segments, which may be substantially parallel to one another in a compressed state of
The stent structure 20 may be manufactured from a super-elastic material. Solely by way of example, the super-elastic material may comprise a shape-memory alloy, such as a nickel titanium alloy (nitinol). If the stent structure 20 comprises a self-expanding material such as nitinol, the stent may be heat-set into the desired expanded state, whereby the stent structure 20 can assume a relaxed configuration in which it assumes the preconfigured first expanded inner diameter upon application of a certain cold or hot medium. Alternatively, the stent structure 20 may be made from other metals and alloys that allow the stent structure 20 to return to its original, expanded configuration upon deployment, without inducing a permanent strain on the material due to compression. Solely by way of example, the stent structure 20 may comprise other materials such as stainless steel, cobalt-chrome alloys, amorphous metals, tantalum, platinum, gold and titanium. The stent structure 20 also may be made from non-metallic materials, such as thermoplastics and other polymers.
It is noted that some foreshortening of the stent structure 20 may occur during expansion of the stent from the collapsed configuration of
Moreover, in order to reduce migration of the stent structure when implanted at a target site, it is preferred that the barbs 33 of the proximal region 30 are oriented in a distally-facing direction, whereas the barbs 83 of the distal region 70 are oriented in a proximally-facing direction. However, additional or fewer barbs may be disposed at various locations along the stent structure 20 and may be oriented in the same or different directions. Moreover, integral and/or externally attached barbs may be used.
Referring now to
The proximal region 130 generally comprises a cylindrical body having an outer diameter that is approximately equal to, or just less than, an expanded inner diameter of the proximal region 30 of the stent structure 20. In one method of manufacture, shown in
The tapered region 150 of the aortic valve 120 may comprise two opposing flat surfaces 152 and 154, as shown in
The distal region 170 of the aortic valve 120 may comprise a generally rectangular profile from an end view, i.e., looking at the device from a distal to proximal direction. The distal region 170 comprises the opposing flat surfaces 172 and 174 noted above, which are separated by narrower flat sides 175a and 175b, as shown in
The aortic valve 120 may comprise a biocompatible graft material is preferably non-porous so that it does not leak under physiologic forces. The graft material may be formed of Thoralon® (Thoratec® Corporation, Pleasanton, Calif.), Dacron® (VASCUTEK® Ltd., Renfrewshire, Scotland, UK), a composite thereof, or another suitable material. Preferably, the graft material is formed without seams. The tubular graft can be made of any other at least substantially biocompatible material including such fabrics as other polyester fabrics, polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE), expanded PTFE, and other synthetic materials. Naturally occurring biomaterials are also highly desirable, particularly a derived collagen material known as extracellular matrix. An element of elasticity may be incorporated as a property of the fabric or by subsequent treatments such as crimping.
Referring to
When the aortic valve 120 is coupled to the stent structure 20 as shown in
Advantageously, the distal region 170 of the aortic valve 120 is disposed within the tapered region 50 and/or the distal region 70 of the stent structure 20, which are positioned in the proximal ascending thoracic aorta above (distal to) the annulus and above the native aortic valve. Previous valves are designed to occupy the aortic annulus; however, the unpredictable shape and diameter of the aortic annulus makes the valve unpredictable in shape and diameter, leading to asymmetric replacement valve movement, leakage and reduced durability. In short, by moving the distal region 170 of the aortic valve 120 to a distally spaced-apart location relative to the native aortic valve, i.e., the unpredictable shape and diameter of the aortic annulus have less impact upon the spaced-apart distal region 170 of the aortic valve 120, and therefore the distal region 170 is less subject to asymmetric valve movement and leakage, and may have increased durability.
The shape and dimensions of the proximal and tapered regions 130 and 150 can vary without significantly affecting flow or valve function at the distal region 170. While the distal region 170 of the valve 120 is shown having a generally rectangular shape, a tricuspid-shaped distal region of the valve may be provided, in which case the tapered region 150 may be omitted or altered to accommodate such a tricuspid-shaped distal region.
Referring now to
The aortic prosthesis 10 is introduced into a patient's vascular system, delivered, and deployed using a deployment device, or introducer. The deployment device delivers and deploys the aortic prosthesis 10 within the aorta at a location to replace the aortic valve 106, as shown in
In one aspect, a trigger wire release mechanism is provided for releasing a retained end of the stent structure 20 of the aortic prosthesis 10. Preferably, the trigger wire arrangement includes at least one trigger wire extending from a release mechanism through the deployment device, and the trigger wire is engaged with selected locations of the stent structure 20. Individual control of the deployment of various regions of the stent structure 20 enables better control of the deployment of the aortic prosthesis 10 as a whole.
While the stent structure 20 is generally described as a self-expanding framework herein, it will be appreciated that a balloon-expandable framework may be employed to accomplish the same functionality. If a balloon-expandable stent structure is employed, then a suitable balloon catheter is employed to deliver the aortic prosthesis as generally outlined above. Optionally, after deployment of a self-expanding stent structure 20, a relatively short balloon expandable stent may be delivered and deployed inside of the proximal region 30 of the stent structure 20 to provided added fixation at the location of the aortic sinus.
Upon deployment, the aortic prosthesis 10 is positioned as generally shown in
When the aortic prosthesis 10 is implanted, sufficient flow into the coronary arteries 117 and 118 is maintained during retrograde flow. In particular, after blood flows through the distal region 170 of the aortic valve 120, blood is allowed to flow adjacent to the outside of the tapered central region 150 of the aortic valve 120 and into the coronary arteries 117 and 118, i.e., through the open individual cells of the stent structure 20.
Further, if the barbs 33 are disposed at the proximal region 30, the barbs 33 promote a secure engagement with the aortic sinus 106. Similarly, the barbs 83 at the distal region 70 promote a secure engagement with the ascending aorta 105. In the event barbs are omitted, the proximal and distal regions 30 and 70 may be configured so that the radial forces exerted upon the coronary sinus 105 and the ascending aorta 105, respectively, are enough to hold the stent structure 20 in place.
The shape, size, and dimensions of each of the members of the aortic prosthesis 10 may vary. The size of a preferred prosthetic device is determined primarily by the diameter of the vessel lumen (preferably for a healthy valve/lumen combination) at the intended implant site, as well as the desired length of the overall stent and valve device. Thus, an initial assessment of the location of the natural aortic valve in the patient is determinative of several aspects of the prosthetic design. For example, the location of the natural aortic valve in the patient will determine the dimensions of the stent structure 20 and the aortic valve 120, the type of valve material selected, and the size of deployment vehicle.
After implantation, the aortic valve 120 replaces the function of the recipient's native damaged or poorly performing aortic valve. The aortic valve 120 allows blood flow when the pressure on the proximal side of the aortic valve 120 is greater than pressure on the distal side of the valve. Thus, the artificial valve 120 regulates the unidirectional flow of fluid from the heart into the aorta.
Referring now to
In
In the example of
The angles α3 of the suspension ties 180a-180d relative to the longitudinal axis L, as shown in
In one example, the suspension ties 180a-180d comprise a thickness of between about 0.002-0.02 inches, and are molded into a Thoralon® or Dacron® coating. Other materials may be used, so long as the suspension ties 180a-180d are non-thrombogenic, or coated with a non-thrombogenic material.
Advantageously, in the case where the tapered or distal regions 150 and 170 of the aortic valve 120 are supported from above through attachment to the stent structure 20 at a location in the ascending thoracic aorta, the aortic valve 120 can therefore be as long as necessary for optimal valve function, even if it is of a simple bicuspid design. In other words, the length of the aortic valve 120 can be varied such that the distal region 170 of the aortic valve 120 is positioned at the desired location within the ascending thoracic aorta spaced-apart from the native aortic annulus.
Referring now to
In the phase of systole for the aortic valve 120, shown in
In one example, the reinforcement strips 185a-185c of
In
In still further embodiments, the stent structure 20 shown herein may be used in connection with different aortic valves, beside the aortic valve 120. Solely by way of example, and without limitation, various artificial valve designs may have two or three membranes, and may be arranged in various shapes including slots and flaps that mimic the natural functionality of an anatomical valve. Conversely, the aortic valve 120 shown herein may be used in conjunction with different stent structures.
While various embodiments of the invention have been described, the invention is not to be restricted except in light of the attached claims and their equivalents. Moreover, the advantages described herein are not necessarily the only advantages of the invention and it is not necessarily expected that every embodiment of the invention will achieve all of the advantages described.
The application is a continuation application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/841,744, filed Dec. 14, 2017, which is a continuation application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/286,407, filed Nov. 1, 2011, which claims the benefit of priority under 35 U.S.C. § 120 of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/410,540 filed Nov. 5, 2010, all of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entireties.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4222126 | Boretos et al. | Sep 1980 | A |
4994077 | Dobben | Feb 1991 | A |
5163953 | Vince | Nov 1992 | A |
5332402 | Teitelbaum | Jul 1994 | A |
5370685 | Stevens | Dec 1994 | A |
5397351 | Pavcnik et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5755782 | Love et al. | May 1998 | A |
5840081 | Andersen et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5855597 | Jayaraman | Jan 1999 | A |
5855600 | Alt | Jan 1999 | A |
5938687 | Bouhour et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5938697 | Killion et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
6120534 | Ruiz | Sep 2000 | A |
6168619 | Dinh et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6245102 | Jayaraman | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6254642 | Taylor | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6258120 | McKenzie et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6409756 | Murphy | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6416544 | Sugita et al. | Jul 2002 | B2 |
6440164 | DiMatteo et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6458153 | Bailey et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6482228 | Norred | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6494090 | Losing et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6582462 | Andersen et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6730118 | Spenser et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6773453 | Ravenscroft | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6773454 | Wholey et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6797000 | Simpson et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6830584 | Seguin | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6911040 | Johnson et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
7018406 | Seguin et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7144421 | Carpenter et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7192442 | Solem et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7201772 | Schwammenthal et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7220274 | Quinn | May 2007 | B1 |
7267686 | DiMatteo et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7329278 | Seguin et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7329279 | Haug et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7331991 | Kheradvar et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7351256 | Hojeibane et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7377938 | Sarac et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7381219 | Salahieh et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7429269 | Schwammenthal et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7442204 | Schwammenthal et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7510574 | Le et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7544206 | Cohn | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7556643 | Casey, II et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7572286 | Chen et al. | Aug 2009 | B1 |
7591848 | Allen | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7682390 | Seguin | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7780726 | Seguin | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7789909 | Andersen et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7799072 | Greenberg | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7806920 | Duran | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7857845 | Stacchino et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7892281 | Seguin et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7914569 | Nguyen et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7967853 | Eidenschink et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8016877 | Seguin et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8080054 | Rowe | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8092521 | Figulla et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8167934 | Styrc et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8206437 | Bonhoeffer et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8206438 | Yang et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8348996 | Tuval et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
20020055772 | McGuckin et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20030040792 | Gabbay | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030074052 | Besselink | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030120333 | Ouriel et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030130726 | Thorpe et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030176914 | Rabkin et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030199967 | Hartley et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040044402 | Jung et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040055606 | Hendricksen et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040117003 | Ouriel et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040210304 | Seguin et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040236411 | Sarac et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040254636 | Flagle et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050075725 | Rowe | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050085900 | Case et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050096736 | Osse et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050102018 | Carpenter et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050137682 | Justino | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050182483 | Osborne et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050222674 | Paine | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050251251 | Cribier | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060149360 | Schwammenthal et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060195180 | Kheradvar et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060265056 | Nguyen et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060276813 | Greenberg | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070118209 | Strecker | May 2007 | A1 |
20070123972 | Greenberg et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070168013 | Douglas | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070173926 | Bobo, Jr. et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070213813 | Von Segesser et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070239273 | Allen | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070244546 | Francis | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080039891 | McGuckin, Jr. et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080082166 | Styrc et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080208314 | Skerven | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080208325 | Helmus et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080262593 | Ryan et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080275549 | Rowe | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090099649 | Chobotov et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090125098 | Chuter | May 2009 | A1 |
20090171437 | Brocker et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090198324 | Orlov | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20100063577 | Case et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100094411 | Tuval et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100168839 | Braido et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100256738 | Berglund | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100298927 | Greenberg | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110208289 | Shalev | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20120053676 | Ku et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120116496 | Chuter et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120116498 | Chuter et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120130478 | Shaw | May 2012 | A1 |
20120283820 | Tseng et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2003234967 | Sep 2003 | AU |
2817764 | Sep 2006 | CN |
102007045188 | Jun 2008 | DE |
1 264 582 | Dec 2002 | EP |
2 489 331 | Aug 2012 | EP |
2 489 331 | Jun 2017 | EP |
49-5434 | Feb 1974 | JP |
2004-500189 | Jan 2004 | JP |
2005-514968 | May 2005 | JP |
2008-539985 | Nov 2008 | JP |
2008-541865 | Nov 2008 | JP |
WO 0021463 | Apr 2000 | WO |
WO 2000041652 | Jul 2000 | WO |
WO 0149213 | Jul 2001 | WO |
WO 03003943 | Jan 2003 | WO |
WO 2003003943 | Jan 2003 | WO |
WO 2005011535 | Feb 2005 | WO |
WO 2006124649 | Nov 2006 | WO |
WO 2006127765 | Nov 2006 | WO |
WO 2008070797 | Jun 2008 | WO |
WO 2010008549 | Jan 2010 | WO |
WO 2010096176 | Aug 2010 | WO |
WO 2010098857 | Sep 2010 | WO |
WO 2010099032 | Sep 2010 | WO |
WO 2011025945 | Mar 2011 | WO |
WO 2011106544 | Sep 2011 | WO |
WO 2012027487 | Mar 2012 | WO |
WO 2012039753 | Mar 2012 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Decision of European Patent Opposition as rendered for EP 11 275 139.1, dated Nov. 14, 2019, 20 pgs. |
The Minutes of the Oral Proceedings before the Opposition Division on Oct. 21, 2019 for EP 11 275 139.1, dated Nov. 14, 2019, 30 pgs. |
St. Jude Medical, LLC—European Opposition Against Application/Pat. No. 11275139.1/ 2489331, dated Apr. 5, 2018, 39 pgs. |
No. 16, Boudjemline, Younes et al., “Non-surgical aortic valve replacement: History, present, and future perspectives”, from the book Transcatheter Valve Repair, by eds. Hijazi et al., copyright 2006, Taylor & Francis, United Kingdom, pp. 157-163. |
No. 17, Cribier, Alain et al., “Clinical experience with the Percutaneous heart valve for treatment of degenerative aortic stenosis”, from the book Transcatheter Valve Repair, by eds. Hijazi et al., copyright 2006, Taylor & Francis, United Kingdom, pp. 164-174. |
No. 18, Laborde, Jean-Claude et al., “The CoreValve in the aortic position”, from the book Transcatheter Valve Repair, by eds. Hijazi et al., copyright 2006, Taylor & Francis, United Kingdom, pp. 175-185. |
Biotronik AG—European Opposition Against Application/Patent No. 11275139.1/ 2489331, dated Apr. 4, 2018, 48 pgs. |
Grube, Eberhard et al., “Percutaneous Implantation of the CoreValve Self-Expanding Valve Prosthesis in High-Risk Patients With Aortic Valve Disease”, Circulation of the American Heart Disease, vol. 114, 2006, pp. 1616-1624. |
Cath Lab Digest, “Percutaneous Aortic Valve replacement with a Self-Expanding Stent: The CoreValve ReValving™ Procedure”, talks with founder Dr. Jacques R. Seguin, Nov. 2004, pp. 26 and 28. |
Jilaihawi et al., “Self-Expanding Percutaneous Aortic Valve Implantation”, Cardiac Interventions Today, 2009, pp. 43-49. |
Shultz, Carl J. et al., “Geometry and Degree of Apposition of the CoreValve ReValving System With Multislice Computed Tomography After Implantation in Patients With Aortic Stenosis”, Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 54, No. 10, 2008, pp. 911-918. |
Padala, Muralidhar et al., “An Engineering Review of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Technologies”, Cardiovascular Engineering and Technology, vol. 1, No. 1, 2010, pp. 77-87. |
Popma, Jeffrey J. et al., “TAVI Using the CoreValve Revalving System, An Update on device data and the latest findings.”, Cardiac Interventions Today, Jul./Aug. 2010, pp. 44-51. |
Cribier, Alain et al., “Transcatheter Aortic and Mitral Valve Update, The progress and promise of valvular interventions.”, Cardiac Interventions Today, Jul./Aug. 2010, pp. 35-49. |
Grube, Eberhard et al., “Percutaneous Aortic Valve Replacement, An update on the current state of the CoreValve device.”, Cardiac Interventions Today, May/Jun. 2008, pp. 27-30. |
Green, Jacob et al., “Percutaneous Aortic Valve Replacement”, An overview of catheter-based applications., Cardiac Interventions Today, Jun. 2007, pp. 29-32. |
Dave, Rajesh M. et al, “Aortic Valvuloplasty, The state of the art and an introduction to percutaneous aortic valve technology.”, Cardiac Interventions Today, Jun. 2007, pp. 51-59. |
Feldman, Ted et al., “Prospects for Percutaneous Valve Therapies”, American Heart Association, Circulation vol. 116, 2007, pp. 2866-2877. |
Medgaget, “Medtronic's CoreValve Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement System Performs Well in Trial”, May 20, 2009, 2 pgs. |
Dvir, Danny et al., “Percutaneous Aortic Valve Implantation: Early Clinical Experience and Future Perspectives”, IMAJ, vol. 11. Apr. 2009, pp. 244-249. |
Chiam, Paul T et al., “Percutaneous Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: Assessing Results, Judging Outcomes, and Planning Trials”, JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions, vol. 1, No. 4, 2008, pp. 341-350. |
Appeal Brief filed in U.S. Appl. No. 13/286,407, dated Aug. 21, 2014, 37 pgs. |
Examiner's Answer to Appeal Brief filed in U.S. Appl. No. 13/286,407, dated Dec. 2, 2014, 9 pgs. |
Reply Brief filed in U.S. Appl. No. 13/286,407, dated Feb. 3, 2015, 9 pgs. |
Patent Board Decision for U.S. Appl. No. 13/286,407, dated Oct. 26, 2017, 14 pgs. |
Request for Rehearing of Patent Board Decision, dated Dec. 22, 2017, 16 pgs. |
Decision of Reconsideration Denied, dated Apr. 4, 2018, 12 pgs. |
Decision by CAFC, dated Sep. 6, 2018, 2 pgs. |
Decision of European Patent Opposition for EP 11 275 139.1, dated Nov. 14, 2019, 26 pgs. |
“Medtronic's Corevalve Shows Subclavian Access Success in Patients Contraindicated for Femoral Approach”, Medical News Today, May 21, 2009, http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/150929.php, last visited Nov. 24, 2011 1 pg. |
“Medtronic's CoreValve Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement System Performs Well in Trial”, Medgaget.com article, posted May 20, 2009, http://www.medgadget.com/archives/print/007754print.html, 3 pgs. |
“Beating Heart Aortic Valve. Replacement: the Future is Here” Ashok Babu, M.D., Department of Surgery, University of Colorado, PowerPoint presentation, 33 pgs. |
“Sesame Membrane Covered Stent for SVG's”, Steven R. Bailey, M.D., et al., Univeristy of Texas Health Sciences Center at San Antonio, PowerPoint presentation, 33 pgs. |
“Percutaneous Aortic Valve Implantation Scope of the Problem and Imaging”, E Murat Tuzcu, Cleveland Clinic, 33 pgs. |
“Percutaneous Implantation of the First Repositionable Aortic Valve Prosthesis in a Patent With Severe Aortic Stenosis”, L. Buellesfeld, et al., Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. Apr. 1, 2008; 71(5): 579-84, 1 pg. |
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center Prosthetic Heart Valve Information brochure, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center Division of Cardiology, 37 pgs. |
“Percutaneous Valve Repair and Replacement”, Howard C. Hermann, M.D., University of Pennsylvania Medical Center, PowerPoint presentation, 15 pgs. |
“Percutaneous Approaches to Aortic Valve Replacement”, Adam M. Brodsky, M.D., Applications in Imaging-Cardiac Interventions, Dec. 2004, 6 pgs. |
Percutaneous Aortic Valve Implantation: Early Clinical Experience and Future Perspectives:, Danny Dvir, M.D., et al., IMAJ, vol. 11, Apr. 2009, 6 pgs. |
“Percutaneous Treatment of Aortic Valve Stenosis”, Inder M. Singh, M.D., et al., Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine, vol. 75, No. 11, Nov. 2008, 8 pgs. |
“First Human Case of Retrograde Transcatheter Implantation of an Aortic Valve Prosthesis”, David Paniagua, M.D., et al., Texas Heart Institute Journal, Transcatheter Aortic Valve Prothesis, vol. 32, No. 3, 2005, 6 pgs. |
“Percutaneous Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: Assessing Results, Judging Outcomes, and Planning Trials: The Interventionalist Perspective”, Paul T.L. Chiam, et al., J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Intv. 2008: 1; 341-350, 12 pgs. |
“Percutaneous Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: Evolution of the Technology”, Paul T.L. Chiam, et al., American Heart Journal, Feb. 2009, 229-42, 14 pgs. |
Restriction Requirement for U.S. Appl. No. 13/286,407 dated Dec. 20, 2012, 6 pgs. |
Response to Restriction Requirement for U.S. Appl. No. 13/286,407 dated Jan. 22, 2013, 7 pgs. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/286,407 dated Feb. 15, 2013, 13 pgs. |
Applicant Initiated Interview Summary for U.S. Appl. No. 13/286,407 dated Jun. 6, 2013, 3 pgs. |
Response to Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/286,407 dated Jul. 15, 2013, 13 pgs. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/286,407 dated Sep. 24, 2013, 12 pgs. |
Examination Report No. 1 in Australia Application No. 2011244968, dated Dec. 23, 2012, 3 pages. |
Response to Examination Report No. 1 in Australian Application No. 2011244968, dated Oct. 17, 2013, 11 pages. |
Examination Report No. 2 in Australia Application No. 2011244968, dated Oct. 22, 2013, 4 pages. |
Response to Examination Report No. 2 in Australian Application No. 2011244968, dated Dec. 20, 2013, 7 pages. |
Examination Report No. 3 in Australia Application No. 2011244968, dated Jan. 14, 2014, 4 pages. |
Response to Examination Report No. 3 in Australian Application No. 2011244968, dated Mar. 24, 2014, 6 pages. |
Notice of Acceptance in Australian Application No. 2011244968, dated Apr. 3, 2014, 3 pages. |
Partial European Search Report in European Application No. 11275139.1, dated Jun. 29, 2012, 6 pages. |
Extended European Search Report in European Application No. 11275139.1, dated Oct. 8, 2012, 12 pages. |
Notice of Loss of Rights for EP11275139.1 dated Jun. 13, 2013, 1 pg. |
Response to Notice of Loss of Rights for EP11275139.1 dated Aug. 12, 2013, 11 pgs. |
Intention to Grant in European Application No. 11275139.1, dated Sep. 28, 2016, 6 pages. |
Office Action, and English language translation thereof, in corresponding Japanese Application No. 2011-242377, dated Sep. 1, 2015, 4 pages. |
Response to Office Action, and English language translation thereof, in corresponding Japanese Application No. 2011-242377, dated Jan. 29, 2016, 22 pages. |
Office Action, and English language translation thereof, in corresponding Japanese Application No. 2011-242377, dated Jun. 8, 2016, 8 pages. |
Response to Office Action, and English language translation thereof, in corresponding Japanese Application No. 2011-242377, dated Oct. 12, 2016, 6 pages. |
Decision for Patent, and English language translation thereof, in corresponding Japanese Application No. 2011-242377, dated Feb. 21, 2017, 4 pages. |
Patent Examination Report No. 1 for AU2011244966 dated Dec. 23, 2012, 3 pgs. |
Response to Patent Examination Report No. 1 for AU2011244966 dated Jan. 22, 2014, 5 pgs. |
Patent Examination Report No. 2 in Australian Application No. 2011244966, dated Jan. 28, 2014, 4 pages. |
Response to Patent Examination Report No. 2 in Australian Application No. 2011244966, dated Mar. 21, 2014, 6 pages. |
Notice of Acceptance in Australian Application No. 2011244966, dated Apr. 2, 2014, 2 pages. |
Extended European Search Report for European Patent Application No. 11275138.3 dated Jun. 26, 2012, 6 pgs. |
Response to Written Opinion for European Patent Application No. 11275138.3 filed Jan. 25, 2013, 7 pgs. |
Intention to Grant in European Application No. 11275138.3, dated Oct. 5, 2016, 7 pages. |
Decision to Grant a European Patent Pursuant to Aritcle 97(1) EPC in European Application No. 11275138.3, dated Apr. 6, 2017, pages. |
Updated Intention to Grant in European Application No. 11275138.3, dated Mar. 15, 2017, 7 pages. |
Office Action, and English language translation thereof, in Japanese Application No. 2011-242624, dated Aug. 4, 2015, 7 pages. |
Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 13/286,416, dated Oct. 24, 2013, 7 pages. |
Response to Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 13/286,416, dated Feb. 24, 2014, 17 pages. |
Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 13/286,416, dated Mar. 26, 2014, 10 pages. |
Response to Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 13/286,416, dated Jul. 28, 2014, 17 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2008/012500 dated Feb. 6, 2009, 15 pgs. |
Sisman, Mehtap et al., “The Comparison Between Self-Expanding and Balloon Expandable Stent Results in Left Anterior Descending Artery”, International Journal of Angiology, Jan. 2001, pp. 34-40, vol. 10, No. 1, springer New York, springer Link Date Feb. 19, 2004, 2 pgs. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20200323632 A1 | Oct 2020 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61410540 | Nov 2010 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15841744 | Dec 2017 | US |
Child | 16913472 | US | |
Parent | 13286407 | Nov 2011 | US |
Child | 15841744 | US |