Field of the Invention
This invention relates to implantable medical devices, such as stents. In particular, the invention relates to polymeric stents with radiopaque markers.
Description of the State of the Art
This invention relates to radially expandable endoprostheses, which are adapted to be implanted in a bodily lumen. An “endoprosthesis” corresponds to an artificial device that is placed inside the body. A “lumen” refers to a cavity of a tubular organ such as a blood vessel. A stent is an example of such an endoprosthesis. Stents are generally cylindrically shaped devices, which function to hold open and sometimes expand a segment of a blood vessel or other anatomical lumen such as urinary tracts and bile ducts. Stents are often used in the treatment of atherosclerotic stenosis in blood vessels. “Stenosis” refers to a narrowing or constriction of the diameter of a bodily passage or orifice. In such treatments, stents reinforce body vessels and prevent restenosis following angioplasty in the vascular system. “Restenosis” refers to the reoccurrence of stenosis in a blood vessel or heart valve after it has been treated (as by balloon angioplasty, stenting, or valvuloplasty) with apparent success.
The structure of stents is typically composed of scaffolding that includes a pattern or network of interconnecting structural elements or struts. The scaffolding can be formed from wires, tubes, or sheets of material rolled into a cylindrical shape. In addition, a medicated stent may be fabricated by coating the surface of either a metallic or polymeric scaffolding with a polymeric carrier. The polymeric scaffolding may also serve as a carrier of an active agent or drug.
The first step in treatment of a diseased site with a stent is locating a region that may require treatment such as a suspected lesion in a vessel, typically by obtaining an x-ray image of the vessel. To obtain an image, a contrast agent, which contains a radiopaque substance such as iodine is injected into a vessel. “Radiopaque” refers to the ability of a substance to absorb x-rays. The x-ray image depicts the lumen of the vessel from which a physician can identify a potential treatment region. The treatment then involves both delivery and deployment of the stent. “Delivery” refers to introducing and transporting the stent through a bodily lumen to a region in a vessel that requires treatment. “Deployment” corresponds to the expanding of the stent within the lumen at the treatment region. Delivery and deployment of a stent are accomplished by positioning the stent about one end of a catheter, inserting the end of the catheter through the skin into a bodily lumen, advancing the catheter in the bodily lumen to a desired treatment location, expanding the stent at the treatment location, and removing the catheter from the lumen. In the case of a balloon expandable stent, the stent is mounted about a balloon disposed on the catheter. Mounting the stent typically involves compressing or crimping the stent onto the balloon. The stent is then expanded by inflating the balloon. The balloon may then be deflated and the catheter withdrawn. In the case of a self-expanding stent, the stent may be secured to the catheter via a retractable sheath or a sock. When the stent is in a desired bodily location, the sheath may be withdrawn allowing the stent to self-expand.
The stent must be able to simultaneously satisfy a number of mechanical requirements. First, the stent must be capable of withstanding the structural loads, namely radial compressive forces, imposed on the stent as it supports the walls of a vessel lumen. In addition to having adequate radial strength or more accurately, hoop strength, the stent should be longitudinally flexible to allow it to be maneuvered through a tortuous vascular path and to enable it to conform to a deployment site that may not be linear or may be subject to flexure. The material from which the stent is constructed must allow the stent to undergo expansion, which typically requires substantial deformation of localized portions of the stent's structure. Once expanded, the stent must maintain its size and shape throughout its service life despite the various forces that may come to bear thereon, including the cyclic loading induced by the beating heart. Finally, the stent must be biocompatible so as not to trigger any adverse vascular responses.
In addition to meeting the mechanical requirements described above, it is desirable for a stent to be radiopaque, or fluoroscopically visible under x-rays. Accurate stent placement is facilitated by real time visualization of the delivery of a stent. A cardiologist or interventional radiologist can track the delivery catheter through the patient's vasculature and precisely place the stent at the site of a lesion. This is typically accomplished by fluoroscopy or similar x-ray visualization procedures. For a stent to be fluoroscopically visible it must be more absorptive of x-rays than the surrounding tissue. Radiopaque materials in a stem may allow for its direct visualization.
In many treatment applications, the presence of a stent in a body may be necessary for a limited period of time until its intended function of, for example, maintaining vascular patency and/or drug delivery is accomplished. Therefore, stents fabricated from biodegradable, bioabsorbable, and/or bioerodable materials may be configured to meet this additional clinical requirement since they may be designed to completely erode after the clinical need for them has ended. Stents fabricated from biodegradable polymers are particularly promising, in part because they may be designed to completely erode within a desired time frame.
However, a significant shortcoming of biodegradable polymers (and polymers generally composed of carbon, hydrogen, oxygen, and nitrogen) is that they are radiolucent with no radiopacity. Biodegradable polymers tend to have x-ray absorption similar to body tissue.
One way of addressing this problem is to attach radiopaque markers to structural elements of the stent. A radiopaque marker can be disposed within a structural element in such a way that the marker is secured to the structural element. However, the use of stent markers on polymeric stents entails a number of challenges. One challenge relates to the difficulty of insertion of markers.
Another challenge pertains to the fact that some regions of polymeric struts tend to undergo significant deformation or strain during crimping and expansion. In particular, such changes are due to plastic deformation of polymers. Thus, during stent deployment, the portion of a stent containing an element may crack or stretch as stress is being applied to the expanding stent. As a result, the marker may become dislodged.
Embodiments of the present invention are directed to a stent including a deformed radiopaque marker disposed in a depot in a portion of the stent. The marker may be coupled to the portion at least partially by an interference fit between an expanded portion of the marker and an internal surface of the portion of the stent within the depot. In an embodiment, at least some gaps between the deformed marker and the internal surface may be filled with a polymeric coating material. The markers may include sufficient radiopacity to be imaged by an imaging technique.
Further embodiments of the present invention are directed to a method of fabricating a stent that may include disposing a radiopaque marker in a depot in a portion of the stent and compressing the marker to couple the marker within the depot. In an embodiment, compressing the marker may expand a portion of the marker within the depot to create an interference fit between the expanded portion and an internal surface of the stent within the depot. The method may further include applying a coating material to fill gaps between the deformed marker and the internal surface.
Other embodiments of the present invention are directed to a stent including a radiopaque marker disposed in a depot in a portion of the stent such that the marker may be coupled to the stent at least partially by an interference fit between the marker and a deformed portion of the stent adjacent to the depot.
Additional embodiments of the present invention are directed to a stent including a radiopaque marker disposed in a depot in a portion of the stent that is configured to accommodate the marker such that a surface of the portion adjacent to the depot may include a recess. The recess may facilitate deformation of the portion when the marker is disposed within the depot so as to facilitate coupling of the marker to the portion.
Additional embodiments of the present invention are directed to a stent including a marker disposed within a depot in a portion of the stent such that the stent may have regions with a lower strain than other higher strain portions when the stent is placed under an applied stress during use. The depot may be selectively positioned in a selected region of lower strain.
The present invention may be applied to stents and, more generally, implantable medical devices such as, but is not limited to, self-expandable stents, balloon-expandable stents, stent-grafts, vascular grafts, cerebrospinal fluid shunts, pacemaker leads, closure devices for patent foramen ovale, and synthetic heart valves.
A stent can have virtually any structural pattern that is compatible with a bodily lumen in which it is implanted. Typically, a stent is composed of a pattern or network of circumferential and longitudinally extending interconnecting structural elements or struts. In general, the struts are arranged in patterns, which are designed to contact the lumen walls of a vessel and to maintain vascular patency. A myriad of strut patterns are known in the art for achieving particular design goals. A few of the more important design characteristics of stents are radial or hoop strength, expansion ratio or coverage area, and longitudinal flexibility. The present invention is applicable to virtually any stent design and is, therefore, not limited to any particular stent design or pattern. One embodiment of a stent pattern may include cylindrical rings composed of struts. The cylindrical rings may be connected by connecting struts.
In some embodiments, a stent of the present invention may be formed from a tube by laser cutting the pattern of struts in the tube. The stent may also be formed by laser cutting a polymeric sheet, rolling the pattern into the shape of the cylindrical stent, and providing a longitudinal weld to form the stent. Other methods of forming stents are well known and include chemically etching a polymeric sheet and rolling and then welding it to form the stent. A polymeric wire may also be coiled to form the stent. The stent may be formed by injection molding of a thermoplastic or reaction injection molding of a thermoset polymeric material. Filaments of the compounded polymer may be extruded or melt spun. These filaments can then be cut, formed into ring elements, welded closed, corrugated to form crowns, and then the crowns welded together by heat or solvent to form the stent. Lastly, hoops or rings may be cut from tubing stock, the tube elements stamped to form crowns, and the crowns connected by welding or laser fusion to form the stent.
A stent can be made of a biostable and/or biodegradable polymer. As indicated above, a stent made from a biodegradable polymer is intended to remain in the body for a duration of time until its intended function of, for example, maintaining vascular patency and/or drug delivery is accomplished. After the process of degradation, erosion, absorption, and/or resorption has been completed, no portion of the biodegradable stent, or a biodegradable portion of the stent will remain. In some embodiments, very negligible traces or residue may be left behind. The duration can be in a range from about a month to a few years. However, the duration is typically in a range from about one month to twelve months, or in some embodiments, six to twelve months. It is important for the stent to provide mechanical support to a vessel for at least a portion of the duration. Many biodegradable polymers have erosion rates that make them suitable for treatments that require the presence of a device in a vessel for the above-mentioned time-frames.
In general, polymers can be biostable, bioabsorbable, biodegradable, or bioerodable. Biostable refers to polymers that are not biodegradable. The terms biodegradable, bioabsorbable, and bioerodable, as well as degraded, eroded, and absorbed, are used interchangeably and refer to polymers that are capable of being completely eroded or absorbed when exposed to bodily fluids such as blood and can be gradually resorbed, absorbed and/or eliminated by the body.
Biodegradation refers generally to changes in physical and chemical properties that occur in a polymer upon exposure to bodily fluids as in a vascular environment. The changes in properties may include a decrease in molecular weight, deterioration of mechanical properties, and decrease in mass due to erosion or absorption. Mechanical properties may correspond to strength and modulus of the polymer. Deterioration of the mechanical properties of the polymer decreases the ability of a stent, for example, to provide mechanical support in a vessel. The decrease in molecular weight may be caused by, for example, hydrolysis, oxidation, enzymolysis, and/or metabolic processes.
Representative examples of polymers that may be used to fabricate embodiments of stents, or more generally, implantable medical devices include, but are not limited to, poly(N-acetylglucosamine) (Chitin), Chitosan, poly(3-hydroxyvalerate), poly(lactide-co-glycolide), poly(3-hydroxybutyrate), poly(4-hydroxybutyrate), poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate), polyorthoester, polyanhydride, poly(glycolic acid), poly(glycolide), poly(L-lactic acid), poly(L-lactide), poly(D,L-lactic acid), poly(D,L-lactide), poly(L-lactide-co-D,L-lactide), poly(caprolactone), poly(L-lactide-co-caprolactone), poly(D,L-lactide-co-caprolactone), poly(glycolide-co-caprolactone), poly(trimethylene carbonate), polyester amide, poly(glycolic acid-co-trimethylene carbonate), co-poly(ether-esters) (e.g. PEO/PLA), polyphosphazenes, biomolecules (such as fibrin, fibrinogen, cellulose, starch, collagen, and hyaluronic acid), polyurethanes, silicones, polyesters, polyolefins, polyisobutylene and ethylene-alphaolefin copolymers, acrylic polymers and copolymers, vinyl halide polymers and copolymers (such as polyvinyl chloride), polyvinyl ethers (such as polyvinyl methyl ether), polyvinylidene halides (such as polyvinylidene chloride), polyacrylonitrile, polyvinyl ketones, polyvinyl aromatics (such as polystyrene), polyvinyl esters (such as polyvinyl acetate), acrylonitrile-styrene copolymers, ABS resins, polyamides (such as Nylon 66 and polycaprolactam), polycarbonates, polyoxymethylenes, polyimides, polyethers, polyurethanes, rayon, rayon-triacetate, cellulose acetate, cellulose butyrate, cellulose acetate butyrate, cellophane, cellulose nitrate, cellulose propionate, cellulose ethers, and carboxymethyl cellulose. Additional representative examples of polymers that may be especially well suited for use in fabricating embodiments of implantable medical devices disclosed herein include ethylene vinyl alcohol copolymer (commonly known by the generic name EVOH or by the trade name EVAL), poly(butyl methacrylate), poly(vinylidene fluoride-co-hexafluoropropene) (e.g., SOLEF 21508, available from Solvay Solexis PVDF, Thorofare, N.J.), polyvinylidene fluoride (otherwise known as KYNAR, available from ATOFINA Chemicals, Philadelphia, Pa.), ethylene-vinyl acetate copolymers, poly(vinyl acetate), styrene-isobutylene-styrene triblock copolymers, and polyethylene glycol.
It is generally desirable to minimize the interference of a stent or marker with the structure of a lumen and/or with flow of bodily fluid through the lumen. Sharp edges, protrusions, etc. in the path of blood flow can result in formation of turbulent and stagnant zones which can act as a nidus for thrombosis. A smaller and/or smoother profile of a body portion may be more hemocompatible. Additionally, a smaller and smoother profile presented by a marker has much less likelihood of catching on other parts of the delivery system such as the guidewire or guiding catheter. The embodiments of stents with markers discussed herein do not contribute significantly to the form factor, or profile, of the stent in such a way that interferes with the structure of a lumen and/or with flow of bodily fluid through the lumen.
As indicated above, it is desirable to have the capability of obtaining images of polymeric stents with x-ray fluoroscopy during and after implantation. Various embodiments of the present invention include stents with markers disposed within depots or holes in a stent. In an embodiment, the depot may be formed in a structural element by laser machining. The depot may extend partially or completely through the portion of the stent. For example, an opening of a depot may be on an abluminal or luminal surface and extend partially through the stent or completely through to an opposing surface. The markers may be sufficiently radiopaque for imaging the stent. In addition, embodiments of the stents with markers tend to be biocompatible and do not interfere with treatment.
Certain embodiments of a stent may include a deformed radiopaque marker disposed in a depot in a portion of the stent. The marker may be coupled to the portion at least partially by an interference fit between an expanded section of the marker and an internal surface of the portion of the stent within the depot. In some embodiments, a marker in an undeformed state may be disposed in a depot and compressed to couple the marker within the depot. Compressing the marker may expand a portion of the marker within the depot to create the interference fit. After compressing, the deformed marker may have at least one compressed portion in addition to the expanded portion.
There may be difficulties with the insertion of markers of certain shapes in the depots. For example, it may be necessary to orient or align a cylindrical element for insertion into a cylindrical depot. Cylindrical markers or slugs can be difficult to insert due to rotation of the slug during insertion.
However, it is not necessary to orient a spherical marker due to the spherical symmetry of the marker. A spherical marker can be selected that has a size that allows the marker to fit into a depot.
In some embodiments, a marker disposed in a depot may be compressed at the portions at the openings of the depot. The marker may then expand within the depot to create an interference fit. The compressed portion may correspond to compressed ends with an expanded portion between the ends. An interference fit may be between the expanded portion of the marker and the internal surface of the depot. For example, a spherical marker may be compressed at two ends and expand about an equator. In an embodiment, the marker may have a size that allows an interference fit within the depot. Such an interference fit may be particularly useful for markers composed of materials that are relatively easily deformed or malleable, such as, but not limited to gold.
In one embodiment, a marker may be placed in the depot and then pressed into place with a small flat tool or a machined fixture. In an embodiment, the marker may be disposed in a depot using a syringe. The markers may be held at the end of the syringe by a vacuum or surface tension of a viscous fluid. In some embodiments, the markers may be heated prior to placement into the depot.
After disposing and compressing the marker, there may be gaps between the marker and the internal surface of the depot. Such gaps may allow a marker to become loose and fall out of the depot. In some embodiments, at least some of the gaps between the deformed marker and the internal surface may be filled with a polymeric coating. A coating material composed of a polymer dissolved in a solvent may be applied to fill the gaps. The coating material may be applied in various ways known in the art such as by spraying or dipping.
Some materials that are desirable for use in markers such as platinum may be difficult to compress and deform to create an interference fit. Compressing such materials may cause damage to portions of a stent adjacent to a depot. Therefore, it may be desirable to couple a marker within a depot in an undeformed or substantially undeformed state through deformation of the stent adjacent to the depot.
In some embodiments, a stent may include a radiopaque marker disposed in a depot in a portion of the stent. The marker may be coupled to the stent at least partially by an interference fit between the marker and a deformed portion of the stent adjacent to the depot. In an embodiment, the marker may be undeformed or substantially undeformed after being coupled to the stent. In one embodiment, the deformed portion of the stent within the depot may include deformable projections adapted to deform when the marker is disposed in the depot. The projections may include ridges that are parallel, perpendicular, or between parallel and perpendicular to a cylindrical axis of the depot.
In other embodiments, a depot may have a cross-section different from a cross-section of the marker. In addition, a length across a portion of the depot may be less than a cross-section of a marker. When the marker is disposed with the depot, the portion of the stent may deform to change the cross-section of the depot to accommodate the marker. The deformation of the stent may create an interference fit between the marker and a portion of the surface of the stent within the depot. For a marker with a circular cross-section such as a sphere or cylinder, depots with non-circular cross-sections can be a variety of shapes such as oval, ellipsoid, rectangular, etc.
As indicated above, positioning a marker within a depot may cause deformation in a portion of the stent adjacent to the depot. It may be desirable to increase the flexibility of the portion to reduce or eliminate damage to the stent as the portion deforms. In some embodiments, a surface of the portion adjacent to the depot may include a recess. The recess may facilitate deformation or increase the flexibility of the portion when the marker is disposed within the depot so as to facilitate coupling of the marker to the portion.
In one embodiment, the recess may be a groove in communication with the depot. The surface may include more than one groove of various widths and depths. For example, a groove may have a width that is less than 1%, 3%, 5%, 10%, 15%, 20%, or 20% of a diameter of a depot. Additionally, a groove may have a depth that is less than 1%, 3%, 5%, 10%, 15%, or 20% of a radial thickness of a strut that has the depot.
As indicated above, certain regions of polymeric struts tend to undergo significant deformation or strain during crimping and expansion. Such regions include curved or bent regions such as regions 14, 16, and 18 in
Therefore, in some embodiments, it may be desirable or necessary to have a higher mass or thickness in regions with depots than regions without depots. The higher mass or thickness may reinforce the region which can at least partially compensate for the presence of the depot. A region can be reinforced with added mass of stent material so that it can adequately withstand the stress of crimping and expansion without significant distortion of the structural element in the region of the depot.
Furthermore, a high strain region tends to require a larger mass to compensate for the depot than a low strain region. An increase in mass of a stent increases the form factor of the stent, which is generally not desirable.
In certain embodiments, a stent may include a marker disposed within a depot in a portion of the stent. The stent may have regions with a lower strain than other higher strain regions when the stent is placed under an applied stress during use. The depot may be selectively positioned in a selected region of lower strain. The selected region of the structural element may be modified to have a higher mass or thickness than a region of lower strain without a marker so as to maintain the load-bearing capability of the selected region and to inhibit decoupling of the marker from the stent.
In certain embodiments, a spherical marker may additionally or alternatively be coupled within a depot with any suitable biocompatible adhesive. In one embodiment, the adhesive may include a solvent. The solvent may dissolve the polymer of the structural element within the depot to allow the marker within the depot to be coupled to the structural element. For markers that include a polymer, a solvent may also dissolve a portion of the marker. In another embodiment, the adhesive may include a solvent mixed with a polymer. The solvent or the solvent-polymer mixture may be applied to the structural element within the depot or the marker followed by disposing the marker within the depot. The solvent may then be removed through evaporation. Evaporation may be facilitated by, for example, heating the structural element in an oven or by some other method.
Representative examples of solvents may include, but are not limited to, chloroform, acetone, chlorobenzene, ethyl acetate, 1,4-dioxane, ethylene dichloride, 2-ethyhexanol, and combinations thereof. Representative polymers may include biostable and biodegradable polymers disclosed herein that may be dissolved by the selected solvent.
In other embodiments, adhesives may include, but are not limited to, thermosets such as, for example, epoxies, polyesters and phenolics; thermoplastics such as, for example, polyamides, polyesters and ethyl vinyl acetate (EVA) copolymers; and elastomers such as, for example, natural rubber, styrene-isoprene-styrene block copolymers, and polyisobutylene. Other adhesives include, but are not limited to, proteins; cellulose; starch; poly(ethylene glycol); fibrin glue; and derivatives and combinations thereof.
Mixtures of solvents and another substance can be used to form adhesives. In some embodiments, mixtures of water and sugar such as, for example, mixtures of water and sucrose, can be used as an adhesive. In other embodiments, mixtures of PEG, or derivatives thereof, can be mixed with a suitable solvent to form an adhesive. Suitable solvents for PEG, or derivatives thereof, include, but are not limited to, water, ethanol, chloroform, acetone, and the like.
In other embodiments, the marker can be coupled to the structural element by a thermal weld. Prior to disposing the marker in the structural element, a metallic marker may be heated to a temperature that can melt at least a portion of the polymer of the structural element. A marker including a polymer can be heated to a temperature at or above its melting temperature prior to disposing the marker in the depot.
Furthermore, the markers may be coupled to any desired location on a stent. In some embodiments, it may be advantageous to limit the placement of a marker to particular locations or portions of surfaces of a stent. For example, it may be desirable to couple a marker at a sidewall face of a structural element to reduce or eliminate interference with a lumen wall or interference with blood flow, respectively. To delineate just the margins of the stent so that the physician may see its full length, markers can be placed only at the distal and proximal ends of the stent.
Additionally, a device such as a stent may typically include two or more markers coupled to various locations of the stent. The markers may be distributed in a manner that facilitates visualization of the stent during and after implantation. For instance, the markers may be distributed circumferentially and longitudinally throughout a stent pattern.
As indicated above, a stent may include a biostable and/or a biodegradable polymer. The biodegradable polymer may be a pure or substantially pure biodegradable polymer. Alternatively, the biodegradable polymer may be a mixture of at least two types of biodegradable polymers. The stent may be configured to completely erode away once its function is fulfilled.
In certain embodiments, the marker may be biodegradable. It may be desirable for the marker to degrade at the same or substantially the same rate as the stent. For instance, the marker may be configured to completely or almost completely erode at the same time or approximately the same time as the stent. In other embodiments, the marker may degrade at a faster rate than the stent. In this case, the marker may completely or almost completely erode before the body of the stent is completely eroded.
Furthermore, a radiopaque marker may be composed of a biodegradable and/or biostable metal. Biodegradable or bioerodable metals tend to erode or corrode relatively rapidly when exposed to bodily fluids. Biostable metals refer to metals that are not biodegradable or bioerodable or have negligible erosion or corrosion rates when exposed to bodily fluids. In some embodiments, metal erosion or corrosion involves a chemical reaction between a metal surface and its environment. Erosion or corrosion in a wet environment, such as a vascular environment, results in removal of metal atoms from the metal surface. The metal atoms at the surface lose electrons and become charged ions that leave the metal to form salts in solution.
Additionally, it is desirable to use a biocompatible biodegradable metal for a marker. A biocompatible biodegradable metal forms erosion products that do not negatively impact bodily functions.
In one embodiment, the radiopaque marker may be composed of a pure or substantially pure biodegradable metal. Alternatively, the marker may be a mixture or alloy of at least two types of metals. Representative examples of biodegradable metals for use in a marker may include, but are not limited to, magnesium, zinc, and iron. Representative mixtures or alloys may include magnesium/zinc, magnesium/iron, zinc/iron, and magnesium/zinc/iron. Radiopaque compounds such as iodine salts, bismuth salts, or barium salts may be compounded into the metallic biodegradable marker to further enhance the radiopacity.
Representative examples of biostable metals can include, but are not limited to, platinum and gold.
In some embodiments, the composition of the marker may be modified or tuned to obtain a desired erosion rate and/or degree of radiopacity. For example, the erosion rate of the marker may be increased by increasing the fraction of a faster eroding component in an alloy. Similarly, the degree of radiopacity may be increased by increasing the fraction of a more radiopaque metal, such as iron, in an alloy. In one embodiment, a biodegradable marker may be completely eroded when exposed to bodily fluids, such as blood, between about a week and about three months, or more narrowly, between about one month and about two months.
In other embodiments, a radiopaque marker may be a mixture of a biodegradable polymer and a radiopaque material. A radiopaque material may be biodegradable and/or bioabsorbable. Representative radiopaque materials may include, but are not limited to, biodegradable metallic particles and particles of biodegradable metallic compounds such as biodegradable metallic oxides, biocompatible metallic salts, gadolinium salts, and iodinated contrast agents.
In some embodiments, the radiopacity of the marker may be increased by increasing the composition of the radiopaque material in the marker. In one embodiment, the radiopaque material may be between 10% and 80%; 20% and 70%; 30% and 60%; or 40% and 50% by volume of the marker.
The biodegradable polymer in the marker may be a pure or substantially pure biodegradable polymer. Alternatively, the biodegradable polymer may be a mixture of at least two types of biodegradable polymers. In one embodiment, the composition of the biodegradable polymer may be modified to alter the erosion rate of the marker since different biodegradable polymers have different erosion rates.
A biocompatible metallic salt refers to a salt that may be safely absorbed by a body. Representative biocompatible metallic salts that may used in a marker include, but are not limited to, ferrous sulfate, ferrous gluconate, ferrous carbonate, ferrous chloride, ferrous fumarate, ferrous iodide, ferrous lactate, ferrous succinate, barium sulfate, bismuth subcarbonate, bismuth potassium tartrate, bismuth sodium iodide, bismuth sodium tartrate, bismuth sodium triglycollamate, bismuth subsalicylate, zinc acetate, zinc carbonate, zinc citrate, zinc iodate, zinc iodide, zinc lactate, zinc phosphate, zinc salicylate, zinc stearate, zinc sulfate, and combinations thereof. The concentration of the metallic salt in the marker may be between 10% and 80%; 20% and 70%; 30% and 60%; or 40% and 50% by volume of the marker.
In addition, representative iodinated contrast agents may include, but are not limited to acetriozate, diatriozate, iodimide, ioglicate, iothalamate, ioxithalamate, selectan, uroselectan, diodone, metrizoate, metrizamide, iohexol, ioxaglate, iodixanol, lipidial, ethiodol, and combinations thereof. The concentration of an iodinated contrast agent in the marker may be between 5% and 80%; 20% and 70%; 30% and 60%; or 40% and 50% by volume of the marker.
The composition of metallic particles may include at least those biodegradable metals discussed above as well as metallic compounds such as oxides. The concentration of metallic particles in the marker may be between 10% and 80%; 20% and 70%; 30% and 60%; or 40% and 50% by volume of the marker. Additionally, individual metallic particles may be a pure or substantially pure metal or a metal compound. Alternatively, individual metallic particles may be a mixture of at least two types of metals or metallic compounds. Individual metallic particles may also be a mixture or an alloy composed of at least two types of metals.
In certain embodiments, the metallic particles may be metallic nanoparticles. A “nanoparticle” refers to a particle with a dimension in the range of about 1 nm to about 100 nm. A significant advantage of nanoparticles over larger particles is that nanoparticles may disperse more uniformly in a polymeric matrix, which results in more uniform properties such as radiopacity and erosion rate. Additionally, nanoparticles may be more easily absorbed by bodily fluids such as blood without negative impact to bodily functions. Representative examples of metallic particles may include, but are not limited to, iron, magnesium, zinc, platinum, gold, and oxides of such metals.
In one embodiment, the composition of different types of metallic particles in the mixture as well as the composition of individual particles may be modified to alter erosion rates and/or radiopacity of the marker. In addition, the ratio of polymer to metallic particles may be modified to alter both the erosion rate and radiopacity.
A marker may be fabricated by methods including, but not limited to, molding, machining, assembly, or a combination thereof. All or part of a metallic or polymeric marker may be fabricated in a mold or machined by a method such as laser machining.
While particular embodiments of the present invention have been shown and described, it will be obvious to those skilled in the art that changes and modifications can be made without departing from this invention in its broader aspects. Therefore, the appended claims are to encompass within their scope all such changes and modifications as fall within the true spirit and scope of this invention.
This application is a continuation of application Ser. No. 11/325,973, filed on Jan. 4, 2006. Application Ser. No. 11/325,973 is incorporated herein by reference it its entirety, including all of the figures.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2697863 | Moser | Dec 1954 | A |
| 3476463 | Kreuzer | Nov 1969 | A |
| 3687135 | Stroganov et al. | Aug 1972 | A |
| 3839743 | Schwarcz | Oct 1974 | A |
| 3900632 | Robinson | Aug 1975 | A |
| 4104410 | Malecki | Aug 1978 | A |
| 4110497 | Hoel | Aug 1978 | A |
| 4321711 | Mano | Mar 1982 | A |
| 4346028 | Griffith | Aug 1982 | A |
| 4596574 | Urist | Jun 1986 | A |
| 4599085 | Riess et al. | Jul 1986 | A |
| 4612009 | Drobnik et al. | Sep 1986 | A |
| 4633873 | Dumican et al. | Jan 1987 | A |
| 4656083 | Hoffman et al. | Apr 1987 | A |
| 4718907 | Karwoski et al. | Jan 1988 | A |
| 4722335 | Vilasi | Feb 1988 | A |
| 4723549 | Wholey et al. | Feb 1988 | A |
| 4732152 | Wallstén et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
| 4733665 | Palmaz | Mar 1988 | A |
| 4739762 | Palmaz | Apr 1988 | A |
| 4740207 | Kreamer | Apr 1988 | A |
| 4743252 | Martin, Jr. et al. | May 1988 | A |
| 4768507 | Fischell et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
| 4776337 | Palmaz | Oct 1988 | A |
| 4800882 | Gianturco | Jan 1989 | A |
| 4816339 | Tu et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
| 4818559 | Hama et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
| 4850999 | Planck | Jul 1989 | A |
| 4877030 | Beck et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
| 4878906 | Lindemann et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
| 4879135 | Greco et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
| 4886062 | Wiktor | Dec 1989 | A |
| 4886870 | D'Amore et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
| 4902289 | Yannas | Feb 1990 | A |
| 4977901 | Ofstead | Dec 1990 | A |
| 4994298 | Yasuda | Feb 1991 | A |
| 5019090 | Pinchuk | May 1991 | A |
| 5028597 | Kodama et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
| 5059211 | Stack et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
| 5061281 | Mares et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
| 5062829 | Pryor et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
| 5084065 | Weldon et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
| 5085629 | Goldberg et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
| 5100429 | Sinofsky et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
| 5104410 | Chowdhary | Apr 1992 | A |
| 5108417 | Sawyer | Apr 1992 | A |
| 5108755 | Daniels et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
| 5112457 | Marchant | May 1992 | A |
| 5123917 | Lee | Jun 1992 | A |
| 5156623 | Hakamatsuka et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
| 5163951 | Pinchuk et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
| 5163952 | Froix | Nov 1992 | A |
| 5163958 | Pinchuk | Nov 1992 | A |
| 5167614 | Tessmann et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
| 5192311 | King et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
| 5197977 | Hoffman, Jr. et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
| 5234456 | Silvestrini | Aug 1993 | A |
| 5234457 | Andersen | Aug 1993 | A |
| 5236447 | Kubo et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
| 5279594 | Jackson | Jan 1994 | A |
| 5282860 | Matsuno et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
| 5289831 | Bosley | Mar 1994 | A |
| 5290271 | Jernberg | Mar 1994 | A |
| 5306286 | Stack et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
| 5306294 | Winston et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
| 5328471 | Slepian | Jul 1994 | A |
| 5330500 | Song | Jul 1994 | A |
| 5342348 | Kaplan | Aug 1994 | A |
| 5342395 | Jarrett et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
| 5342621 | Eury | Aug 1994 | A |
| 5356433 | Rowland et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
| 5380976 | Couch | Jan 1995 | A |
| 5383925 | Schmitt | Jan 1995 | A |
| 5385580 | Schmitt | Jan 1995 | A |
| 5389106 | Tower | Feb 1995 | A |
| 5399666 | Ford | Mar 1995 | A |
| 5423885 | Williams | Jun 1995 | A |
| 5441515 | Khosravi et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
| 5443458 | Eury et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
| 5443500 | Sigwart | Aug 1995 | A |
| 5455040 | Marchant | Oct 1995 | A |
| 5464650 | Berg et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
| 5486546 | Mathiesen et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
| 5500013 | Buscemi et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
| 5502158 | Sinclair et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
| 5507799 | Sumiya | Apr 1996 | A |
| 5514379 | Weissleder et al. | May 1996 | A |
| 5525646 | Lundgren et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
| 5527337 | Stack et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
| 5545408 | Trigg et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
| 5554120 | Chen et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
| 5556413 | Lam | Sep 1996 | A |
| 5565215 | Gref et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5578046 | Liu et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
| 5578073 | Haimovich et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
| 5591199 | Porter et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
| 5591607 | Gryaznov et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
| 5593403 | Buscemi | Jan 1997 | A |
| 5593434 | Williams | Jan 1997 | A |
| 5599301 | Jacobs et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
| 5599922 | Gryaznov et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
| 5603722 | Phan et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
| 5605696 | Eury et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
| 5607442 | Fischell et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
| 5607467 | Froix | Mar 1997 | A |
| 5618299 | Khosravi et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5629077 | Turnlund et al. | May 1997 | A |
| 5631135 | Gryaznov et al. | May 1997 | A |
| 5632771 | Boatman et al. | May 1997 | A |
| 5632840 | Campbell | May 1997 | A |
| 5637113 | Tartaglia et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
| 5649977 | Campbell | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5656186 | Mourou et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
| 5667767 | Greff et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5667796 | Otten | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5670161 | Healy et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5670558 | Onishi et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5686540 | Kakizawa | Nov 1997 | A |
| 5693085 | Buirge et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5700286 | Tartaglia et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5700901 | Hurst et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5704082 | Smith | Jan 1998 | A |
| 5707385 | Williams | Jan 1998 | A |
| 5711763 | Nonami et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
| 5716981 | Hunter et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
| 5725549 | Lam | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5725572 | Lam et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5726297 | Gryaznov et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5728751 | Patnaik | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5733326 | Tomonto et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5733330 | Cox | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5733564 | Lehtinen | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5733925 | Kunz et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5741327 | Frantzen | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5741881 | Patnaik | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5756457 | Wang et al. | May 1998 | A |
| 5756476 | Epstein et al. | May 1998 | A |
| 5765682 | Bley et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5766204 | Porter et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5766239 | Cox | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5766710 | Turnlund et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5769883 | Buscemi et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5770609 | Grainger et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5780807 | Saunders | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5800516 | Fine et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5811447 | Kunz et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5824042 | Lombardi et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5824049 | Ragheb et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5830178 | Jones et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5830461 | Billiar | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5830879 | Isner | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5833651 | Donovan et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5834582 | Sinclair et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5836962 | Gianotti | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5837313 | Ding et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5837835 | Gryaznov et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5840083 | Braach-Maksvytis | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5851508 | Greff et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5853408 | Muni | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5854207 | Lee et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5855612 | Ohthuki et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
| 5855618 | Patnaik et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
| 5858746 | Hubbell et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
| 5865814 | Tuch | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5868781 | Killion | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5873904 | Ragheb et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5874101 | Zhong et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5874109 | Ducheyne et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5874165 | Drumheller | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5876743 | Ibsen et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5877263 | Patnaik et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5879713 | Roth et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5888533 | Dunn | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5891192 | Murayama et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
| 5897955 | Drumheller | Apr 1999 | A |
| 5906759 | Richter | May 1999 | A |
| 5914182 | Drumheller | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5916870 | Lee et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5922005 | Richter et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5942209 | Leavitt et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5948428 | Lee et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5954744 | Phan et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5957975 | Lafont et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5965720 | Gryaznov et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5971954 | Conway et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5976182 | Cox | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5980564 | Stinson | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5980928 | Terry | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5980972 | Ding | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5981568 | Kunz et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5986169 | Gjunter | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5997468 | Wolff et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6007845 | Domb et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6010445 | Armini et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
| 6015541 | Greff et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
| 6022374 | Imran | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6042606 | Frantzen | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6042875 | Ding et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6048964 | Lee et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6051648 | Rhee et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6056993 | Leidner et al. | May 2000 | A |
| 6060451 | DiMaio et al. | May 2000 | A |
| 6066156 | Yan | May 2000 | A |
| 6071266 | Kelley | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6074659 | Kunz et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6080177 | Igaki et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6080488 | Hostettler et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6083258 | Yadav | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6093463 | Thakrar | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6096070 | Ragheb et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6096525 | Patnaik | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6099562 | Ding et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6103230 | Billiar et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6107416 | Patnaik et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6110188 | Narciso, Jr. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6110483 | Whitbourne et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6113629 | Ken | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6117979 | Hendriks et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6120536 | Ding et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6120904 | Hostettler et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6121027 | Clapper et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6125523 | Brown et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6127173 | Eckstein et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6129761 | Hubbell | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6129928 | Sarangapani et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6131266 | Saunders | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6150630 | Perry et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6153252 | Hossainy et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
| 4776337 | Palmaz | Dec 2000 | B1 |
| 6156062 | McGuinness | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6159951 | Karpeisky et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6160084 | Langer et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6160240 | Momma et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6165212 | Dereume et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6166130 | Rhee et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6169170 | Gryaznov et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6171609 | Kunz | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6174326 | Kitaoka et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6174329 | Callol et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6174330 | Stinson | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6177523 | Reich et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6183505 | Mohn, Jr. et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6187045 | Fehring et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6206911 | Milo | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6210715 | Starling et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6224626 | Steinke | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6228845 | Donovan et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6240616 | Yan | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6245076 | Yan | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6245103 | Stinson | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6248344 | Ylanen et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6251135 | Stinson et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6251142 | Bernacca et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6254632 | Wu et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6260976 | Endou et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6273913 | Wright et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6281262 | Shikinami | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6283234 | Torbet | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6284333 | Wang et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6287332 | Bolz et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6290721 | Heath | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6293966 | Frantzen | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6295168 | Hofnagle et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6303901 | Perry et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6312459 | Huang et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6327772 | Zadno-Azizi et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
| 6334871 | Dor et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
| 6355058 | Pacetti et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6361557 | Gittings et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6375826 | Wang et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6379381 | Hossainy et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6387121 | Alt | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6388043 | Langer et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6395326 | Castro et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6402777 | Globerman et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6409752 | Boatman et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6409761 | Jang | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6423092 | Datta et al. | Jul 2002 | B2 |
| 6461632 | Gogolewski | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6464720 | Boatman et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
| 6471721 | Dang | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6475779 | Mathiowithz et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
| 6479565 | Stanley | Nov 2002 | B1 |
| 6485512 | Cheng | Nov 2002 | B1 |
| 6492615 | Flanagan | Dec 2002 | B1 |
| 6494908 | Huxel et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
| 6495156 | Wenz et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
| 6506437 | Harish et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
| 6511748 | Barrows | Jan 2003 | B1 |
| 6517888 | Weber | Feb 2003 | B1 |
| 6521865 | Jones et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
| 6527801 | Dutta | Mar 2003 | B1 |
| 6537589 | Chae et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
| 6539607 | Fehring et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6540777 | Stenzel | Apr 2003 | B2 |
| 6554854 | Flanagan | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6563080 | Shapovalov et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
| 6563998 | Farah et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
| 6565599 | Hong et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
| 6569191 | Hogan | May 2003 | B1 |
| 6569193 | Cox et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
| 6572672 | Yadav et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
| 6574851 | Mirizzi | Jun 2003 | B1 |
| 6582472 | Hart | Jun 2003 | B2 |
| 6585755 | Jackson et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
| 6585765 | Hossainy et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
| 6589227 | Sonderskov | Jul 2003 | B2 |
| 6592614 | Lenker et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
| 6592617 | Thompson | Jul 2003 | B2 |
| 6613072 | Lau et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
| 6620194 | Ding et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
| 6626936 | Stinson | Sep 2003 | B2 |
| 6626939 | Burnside et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
| 6635269 | Jennissen | Oct 2003 | B1 |
| 6641607 | Hossainy et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
| 6645243 | Vallana et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
| 6652579 | Cox et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
| 6656162 | Santini, Jr. et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
| 6664335 | Krishnan | Dec 2003 | B2 |
| 6666214 | Canham | Dec 2003 | B2 |
| 6667049 | Janas et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
| 6669722 | Chen et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
| 6669723 | Killion et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
| 6676697 | Richter | Jan 2004 | B1 |
| 6679980 | Andreacchi | Jan 2004 | B1 |
| 6689375 | Wahlig et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
| 6695920 | Pacetti et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
| 6696667 | Flanagan | Feb 2004 | B1 |
| 6699278 | Fischell et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
| 6706273 | Roessler | Mar 2004 | B1 |
| 6709379 | Brandau et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
| 6719934 | Stinson | Apr 2004 | B2 |
| 6719989 | Matsushima et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
| 6720402 | Langer et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
| 6746773 | Llanos et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
| 6752826 | Holloway et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
| 6753007 | Haggard et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
| 6764505 | Hossainy et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
| 6780261 | Trozera | Aug 2004 | B2 |
| 6801368 | Coufal et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
| 6805898 | Wu et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
| 6818063 | Kerrigan | Nov 2004 | B1 |
| 6822186 | Strassl et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
| 6846323 | Yip et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
| 6852946 | Groen et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
| 6858680 | Gunatillake et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
| 6863685 | Davila et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
| 6867389 | Shapovalov et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
| 6878758 | Martin et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
| 6891126 | Matile | May 2005 | B2 |
| 6899729 | Cox et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
| 6911041 | Zscheeg | Jun 2005 | B1 |
| 6913762 | Caplice et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
| 6918928 | Wolinsky et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
| 6926733 | Stinson | Aug 2005 | B2 |
| 6943964 | Zhang et al. | Sep 2005 | B1 |
| 6981982 | Amstrong et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
| 6981987 | Huxel et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
| 7022132 | Kocur | Apr 2006 | B2 |
| 7128737 | Goder et al. | Oct 2006 | B1 |
| 7163555 | Dinh | Jan 2007 | B2 |
| 7166099 | Devens, Jr. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
| 7226475 | Lenz et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
| 7243408 | Vietmeier | Jul 2007 | B2 |
| 7326245 | Rosenthal et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
| 7331986 | Brown et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
| 7500988 | Butaric et al. | Mar 2009 | B1 |
| 7776926 | Hossainy et al. | Aug 2010 | B1 |
| 8002817 | Limon | Aug 2011 | B2 |
| 8303644 | Lord et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
| 8388673 | Yang et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
| 8539663 | Wang et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
| 8752268 | Wu | Jun 2014 | B2 |
| 9345597 | Pachetti | May 2016 | B2 |
| 20010001317 | Duerig et al. | May 2001 | A1 |
| 20010010003 | Lai | Jul 2001 | A1 |
| 20010021871 | Stinson | Sep 2001 | A1 |
| 20010021873 | Stinson | Sep 2001 | A1 |
| 20010027339 | Boatman et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
| 20010029398 | Jadhav | Oct 2001 | A1 |
| 20010044652 | Moore | Nov 2001 | A1 |
| 20020002399 | Huxel et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
| 20020004060 | Heublein et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
| 20020004101 | Ding et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
| 20020032486 | Lazarovitz et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
| 20020062148 | Hart | May 2002 | A1 |
| 20020065553 | Weber | May 2002 | A1 |
| 20020111590 | Davila et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020116050 | Kocur | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020138133 | Lenz et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20020143386 | Davila et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020161114 | Gunatillake et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020190038 | Lawson | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20020193862 | Mitelberg et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20030004563 | Jackson et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030009235 | Manrique et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030028241 | Stinson | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20030028245 | Barclay et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20030033001 | Igaki | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20030039689 | Chen et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20030050688 | Fischell et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030060872 | Gomringer et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030065355 | Weber | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030069630 | Burgermeister et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030093107 | Parsonage et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030100865 | Santini, Jr. et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030105518 | Dutta | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030105530 | Pirhonen | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030108588 | Chen | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030121148 | DiCaprio | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030153971 | Chandrasekaran | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20030155328 | Huth et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20030171053 | Sanders | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20030187495 | Cully et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030204245 | Brightbill | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030208259 | Penhasi | Nov 2003 | A1 |
| 20030209835 | Chun et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
| 20030226833 | Shapovalov et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
| 20030236563 | Fifer | Dec 2003 | A1 |
| 20040015228 | Lombardi et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040024449 | Boyle | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040027339 | Schulz | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040044399 | Ventura | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040073291 | Brown et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040078071 | Escamilla et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040088039 | Lee et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040093077 | White et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040098090 | Williams et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040098095 | Burnside et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040102758 | Davila et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040106987 | Palasis et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040111149 | Stinson | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040122509 | Brodeur | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040126405 | Sahatjian | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040127970 | Saunders et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040143180 | Zhong et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040143317 | Stinson et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040167610 | Fleming, III | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20040167619 | Case et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20040181236 | Eidenschink et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040204750 | Dinh | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040220662 | Dang et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20040236428 | Burkinshaw et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20050004653 | Gerberding et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050004663 | Llanos et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050015138 | Schuessler et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050021131 | Venkatraman et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050060025 | Mackiewicz et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050087520 | Wang et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050107865 | Clifford et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050111500 | Harter et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050147647 | Glauser et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050154450 | Larson et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050157382 | Kafka et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050172471 | Vietmeier | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20050211680 | Li et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050222673 | Nicholas | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050283226 | Haverkost | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20050283228 | Stanford | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20060025847 | Parker | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060033240 | Weber et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060120418 | Harter et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060173528 | Feld et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060195175 | Bregulla | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060204556 | Daniels et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060241741 | Lootz | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20070021834 | Young et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070038290 | Huang et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070156230 | Dugan et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070179610 | Biedermann et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070195006 | Frye et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070266542 | Melsheimer | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070276476 | Llanos et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070293938 | Gale et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20080009938 | Huang et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080015684 | Wu | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080033532 | Dave | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080051868 | Cottone et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080051873 | Cottone et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080188924 | Prabhu | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20080243226 | Fernandez et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20090076594 | Sabaria | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090105761 | Robie | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090112207 | Walker et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090204203 | Allen et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
| 20100004735 | Yang et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100042215 | Stalcup et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100094405 | Cottone | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20110130521 | Thatcher et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110138022 | Xie et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110208190 | Kumbar et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
| 20110238156 | Tischler et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
| 20110282428 | Meyer et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
| 20120042501 | Wang et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
| 20120082919 | Fircho et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
| 20120271361 | Zhou et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
| 20130131780 | Armstrong et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130150943 | Zheng et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
| 20130255853 | Wang et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| 20130325104 | Wu | Dec 2013 | A1 |
| 20130325105 | Wu | Dec 2013 | A1 |
| 20130325107 | Wu | Dec 2013 | A1 |
| 20130331926 | Wu | Dec 2013 | A1 |
| 20140369435 | Kneckt et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
| 20160120671 | Higashi et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
| 20160228267 | Pacetti et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
| 20160242851 | Lumauig | Aug 2016 | A1 |
| 20160361182 | Lumauig et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 1241442 | Jan 2000 | CN |
| 44 07 079 | Sep 1994 | DE |
| 197 31 021 | Jan 1999 | DE |
| 198 56 983 | Dec 1999 | DE |
| 297 24 852 | Feb 2005 | DE |
| 103 61 942 | Jul 2005 | DE |
| 10 2004 04599 | Mar 2006 | DE |
| 0 108 171 | May 1984 | EP |
| 0 144 534 | Jun 1985 | EP |
| 0 364 787 | Apr 1990 | EP |
| 0 397 500 | Nov 1990 | EP |
| 0 464 755 | Jan 1992 | EP |
| 0 493 788 | Jul 1992 | EP |
| 0 554 082 | Aug 1993 | EP |
| 0 578 998 | Jan 1994 | EP |
| 0 583 170 | Feb 1994 | EP |
| 0 604 022 | Jun 1994 | EP |
| 0 621 017 | Oct 1994 | EP |
| 0 623 354 | Nov 1994 | EP |
| 0 665 023 | Aug 1995 | EP |
| 0 709 068 | May 1996 | EP |
| 0 714 641 | Jun 1996 | EP |
| 0 842 729 | May 1998 | EP |
| 0 970 711 | Jan 2000 | EP |
| 1 210 922 | Jun 2002 | EP |
| 1 277 449 | Jan 2003 | EP |
| 1 479 358 | Nov 2004 | EP |
| 1 570 808 | Sep 2005 | EP |
| 1 591 079 | Nov 2005 | EP |
| 1 656 905 | May 2006 | EP |
| 2 438 891 | Apr 2012 | EP |
| 2 752 173 | Jul 2014 | EP |
| 2 247 696 | Mar 1992 | GB |
| 04-033791 | Feb 1992 | JP |
| 07-124766 | May 1995 | JP |
| 10-166156 | Jun 1998 | JP |
| 2002-233578 | Aug 2002 | JP |
| 2003-053577 | Feb 2003 | JP |
| 2004-358242 | Dec 2004 | JP |
| WO 8903232 | Apr 1989 | WO |
| WO 9001969 | Mar 1990 | WO |
| WO 9004982 | May 1990 | WO |
| WO 9006094 | Jun 1990 | WO |
| WO 9117744 | Nov 1991 | WO |
| WO 9117789 | Nov 1991 | WO |
| WO 9210218 | Jun 1992 | WO |
| WO 9306792 | Apr 1993 | WO |
| WO 9421196 | Sep 1994 | WO |
| WO 9527587 | Oct 1995 | WO |
| WO 9529647 | Nov 1995 | WO |
| WO 9804415 | Feb 1998 | WO |
| WO 9903515 | Jan 1999 | WO |
| WO 9916386 | Apr 1999 | WO |
| WO 9920429 | Apr 1999 | WO |
| WO 9942147 | Aug 1999 | WO |
| WO 0012147 | Mar 2000 | WO |
| WO 0064506 | Nov 2000 | WO |
| WO 0101890 | Jan 2001 | WO |
| WO 0226162 | Apr 2002 | WO |
| WO 0238325 | May 2002 | WO |
| WO 03015664 | Feb 2003 | WO |
| WO 03015978 | Feb 2003 | WO |
| WO 03047463 | Jun 2003 | WO |
| WO 03057075 | Jul 2003 | WO |
| WO 2004019820 | Mar 2004 | WO |
| WO 2004023985 | Mar 2004 | WO |
| WO 2004062533 | Jul 2004 | WO |
| WO 2004112863 | Dec 2004 | WO |
| WO 2005023480 | Mar 2005 | WO |
| WO 2007081551 | Jul 2007 | WO |
| WO 2014064180 | May 2014 | WO |
| WO 2014181713 | Nov 2014 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jun. 29, 2016, for International Application No. PCT/US2016/017333, 13 pages. |
| Acquarulo et al., Enhancing Medical Device Performance with Nanocomposite Poly, Med. Device Link, www.devicelink.com/grabber.php3?URL downloaded Mar. 26, 2007, 4 pgs. |
| Anonymous, Bioabsorbable stent mounted on a catheter having optical coherence tomography capabilities, Research Disclosure, Sep. 2004, pp. 1159-1162. |
| Ansari, End-to-end tubal anastomosis using an absorbable stent, Fertility and Sterility, vol. 32(2), pp. 197-201 (Aug. 1979). |
| Ansari, Tubal Reanastomosis Using Absorbable Stent, International Journal of Fertility, vol. 23(4), pp. 242-243 (1978). |
| Bull, Parylene Coating for Medical Applications, Medical Product Manufacturing News 18, 1 pg. (Mar. 1993). |
| Casper et al., Fiber-Reinforced Absorbable Composite for Orthopedic Surgery, Polymeric Materials Science and Engineering, vol. 53 pp. 497-501 (1985). |
| Detweiler et al., Gastrointestinal Sutureless Anastomosis Using Fibrin Glue: Reinforcement of the Sliding Absorbable Intraluminal Nontoxic Stent and Development of a Stent Placement Device, Journal of Investigative Surgery, vol. 9(2), pp. 111-130 (Mar. /Apr. 1996). |
| Detweiler et al., Sliding, Absorbable, Reinforced Ring and an Axially Driven Stent Placement Device for Sutureless Fibrin Glue Gastrointestinal Anastomisis, Journal of Investigative Surgery, vol. 9(6), pp. 495-504 (Nov./Dec. 1996). |
| Detweiler et al., Sutureless Anastomosis of the Small Intestine and the Colon in Pigs Using an Absorbable Intraluminal Stent and Fibrin Glue, Journal of Investigative Surgery, vol. 8(2), pp. 129-140 (Mar. 1995). |
| Detweiler et al., Sutureless Cholecystojejunostomy in Pigs Using an Absorbable Intraluminal Stent and Fibrin Glue, Journal of Investigative Surgery, vol. 9(1), pp. 13-26 (Jan./Feb. 1996). |
| Devanathan et al., Polymeric Conformal Coatings for Implantable Electronic Devices, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, vol. BME-27(11), pp. 671-675 (1980). |
| Eidelman et al., Characterization of Combinatorial Polymer Blend Composition Gradients by FTIR Microspectroscopy, J. Res. Natl. Inst. Standards and Technol., vol. 109, No. 2, pp. 219-231 (2004). |
| Elbert et al., Conjugate Addition Reactions Combined with Free-Radical Cross-Linking for the Design of Materials for Tissue Engineering, Biomacromolecules, vol. 2, pp. 430-441 (2001). |
| Fan et al., Plasma Absorption of Femtosecond Laser Pulses in Dielectrics, J. of Heat Transfer, vol. 124, pp. 275-283 (2002). |
| Hahn et al., Biocompatibility of Glow-Discharge-Polymerized Films and Vacuum-Deposited Parylene, J Applied Polymer Sci, vol. 38, pp. 55-64 (1984). |
| Hahn et al., Glow Discharge Polymers as Coatings for Implanted Devices, ISA, pp. 109-111 (1981). |
| He et al., Assessment of Tissue Blood Flow Following Small Artery Welding with an Intraluminal Dissolvable Stent, Microsurgery, vol. 19(3), pp. 148-152 (1999). |
| Hoffnagle et al., Design and performance of a refractive optical system that converts a Gaussian to a flattop beam, Applied Optics, vol. 39, No. 30 pp. 5488-5499 (2000). |
| Kelley et al., Totally Resorbable High-Strength Composite Material, Advances in Biomedical Polymers, vol. 35, pp. 75-85 (1987). |
| Kubies et al., Microdomain Structure in polylactide-block-poly(ethylene oxide) copolymer films, Biomaterials, vol. 21, pp. 529-536 (2000). |
| Kutryk et al., Coronary Stenting: Current Perspectives, a companion to the Handbook of Coronary Stents, pp. 1-16 (1999). |
| Martin et al., Enhancing the biological activity of immobilized osteopontin using a type-1 collagen affinity coating, J. Biomed. Mater. Res., vol. 70A, pp. 10-19 (2004). |
| Mauduit et al., Hydrolytic degradation of films prepared from blends of high and low molecular weight poly(DL-lactic acid)s, J. Biomed. Mater. Res., vol. 30, pp. 201-207 (1996). |
| Middleton et al., Synthetic biodegradable polymers as orthopedic devices, Biomaterials, vol. 21, pp. 2335-2346 (2000). |
| Muller et al., Advances in Coronary Angioplasty: Endovascular Stents, Coron. Arter. Dis., vol. 1(4), pp. 438-448 (Jul./Aug. 1990). |
| Nichols et al., Electrical Insulation of Implantable Devices by Composite Polymer Coatings, ISA Transactions, vol. 26(4), pp. 15-18 (1987). |
| Peuster et al., A novel approach to temporary stenting: degradable cardiovascular stents produced from corrodible metal-results 6-18 months after implantation into New Zealand white rabbits, Heart, vol. 86, pp. 563-569 (2001). |
| Pietrzak et al., Bioabsorbable Fixation Devices: Status for the Craniomaxillofacial Surgeon, J. Craniofaxial Surg., vol. 2, pp. 92-96 (1997). |
| Pietrzak et al., Bioresorbable implants—practical considerations, Bone, vol. 19, No. 1, Supplement Jul. 1996, pp. 109S-119S. |
| Redman, Clinical Experience with Vasovasostomy Utilizing Absorbable Intravasal Stent, Urology, vol. 20(1), pp. 59-61 (Jul. 1982). |
| Rust et al., The Effect of Absorbable Stenting on Postoperative Stenosis of the Surgically Enlarged Maxillary Sinus Ostia in a Rabbit Animal Model, Archives of Otolaryngology, vol. 122(12) pp. 1395-1397 (Dec. 1996). |
| Schatz, A View of Vascular Stents, Circulation, vol. 79(2), pp. 445-457 (Feb. 1989). |
| Schmidt et al., Long-Term Implants of Parylene-C Coated Microelectrodes, Med & Biol Eng & Comp, vol. 26(1), pp. 96-101 (Jan. 1988). |
| Spagnuolo et al., Gas 1 is induced by VE-cadherin and vascular endothelial growth factor and inhibits endothelial cell apoptosis, Blood, vol. 103, pp. 3005-3012 (2004). |
| Sun et al., Inert gas beam delivery for ultrafast laser micromachining at ambient pressure, Am. Inst. Of Physics, 6 pgs. |
| Tamai et al., Initial and 6-Month Results of Biodegradable Poly-I-Lactic Acid Coronary Stents in Humans, Circulation, pp. 399-404 (Jul. 25, 2000). |
| Tsuji et al., Biodegradable Polymeric Stents, Current Interventional Cardiology Reports, vol. 3, pp. 10-17 (2001). |
| Völkel et al., Targeting of immunoliposomes to endothelial cells using a single-chain Fv fragment directed against human endoglin (CD105), Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 1663, pp. 158-166 (2004). |
| Von Recum et al., Degradation of polydispersed poly(L-lactic acid) to modulate lactic acid release, Biomaterials, vol. 16, pp. 441-445 (1995). |
| Yau et al., Modern Size-Exclusion Liquid Chromatography, Wiley-Interscience Publication, IX-XV (1979). |
| Zhang et al., Single-element laser beam shaper for uniform flat-top profiles, Optics Express, vol. 11, No. 16, pp. 1942-1948 (2003). |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jun. 15, 2007 in International Patent Application No. PCT/US2006/049269, 19 pages. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Dec. 4, 2007 in International Patent Application No. PCT/US2007/015561, 10 pages. |
| Office Action dated Mar. 31, 2011 in European Patent Application No. 06848153.0, 4 pages. |
| Office Action dated Aug. 16, 2011 in Japanese Patent Application No. P2008-549504, 6 pages. |
| Office Action dated Mar. 27, 2012 in Japanese Patent Application No. P2008-549504, 6 pages. |
| Extended European Search Report dated Jun. 3, 2014 in European Patent Application No. 13161281.4, 9 pages. |
| Office Action dated Jun. 22, 2015 in European Patent Application No. 14200352.4, 7 pages. |
| Extended European Search Report dated Jan. 31, 2017 in European Patent Application No. 16177926.9, 7 pages. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20170071764 A1 | Mar 2017 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 14588286 | Dec 2014 | US |
| Child | 15357987 | US | |
| Parent | 11325973 | Jan 2006 | US |
| Child | 14588286 | US |