The invention relates to step well quantum cascade (QC) structures for use in quantum cascade lasers (QCLs).
Conventional quantum cascade lasers (QCLs) have used square (symmetric when not under an applied bias) quantum wells. At least in part because conventional QCLs use square quantum wells, it is not possible in conventional QCLs to place both the radiative and LO-phonon transitions within one single quantum well when the radiative transition energy spacing is smaller than the LO-phonon energy spacing (as can be for terahertz QCLs).
The first QCL was a mid infrared laser that used LO-phonon scattering for depopulation; however, the diagonal transitions that were used for both the phonon and radiative transitions are generally not well suited for terahertz applications (J. Faist, F. Capasso, D. L. Sivco, C. Sirtori, A. L. Hutchinson, and A. Y. Cho, Science, 264:553 (1994)).
Other conventional square four quantum well and three quantum well LO-phonon terahertz QCLs have been developed. They use at least two quantum wells for the radiative transition and a third quantum well which uses two energy levels; one energy level is used to resonantly tunnel the lower lasing state and the other arranges the lower state, approximately spaced at the LO-phonon energy. While these configurations can have vertical transitions, they use more than one quantum well for the radiative transition, and due to the use of resonant tunneling of the lower lasing state, the lower lasing state always has a doublet of states (for example, see quantum states E4 and E3 in FIG. 5 of U.S. Pat. No. 7,158,545 to Qing Hu, et al.). This doublet of states can provide a mechanism of absorption loss of terahertz radiation in the lower frequency of operation limit. (Q. Hu and B. S. Williams, “Terahertz Lasers and Amplifiers Based on Resonant Optical Phonon Scattering to Achieve Population Inversion,” U.S. Pat. No. 7,158,545, Filed Sep. 12, 2003, issued Jan. 2, 2007) (H. Lou, S. R. Laframboise, Z. R. Wasilewski, G. C. Aers, and H. C. Liu, Appl. Phys. Lett, 90, 04112 (2007)). Also, oscillator strengths typically range from ˜0.5 to less than 1.
Conventional LO-phonon QCL configurations can experience unwanted parasitic injection into the lower lasing state. Attempts to reduce that unwanted parasitic injection have been made by adding an additional well at the injector, but the oscillator strength was reduced with this type of approach (S. Kumar, B. S. Williams, J. L. Reno, Appl. Phys. Lett. 88:121123 (2006)).
Miniband approaches, such as the bound to continuum approach that features minibands and a somewhat isolated radiative state (G. Scalari, L. Ajili, J. Faist, H. Beere, E. Linfield, D. Ritchie, and G. Davies, Appl. Phys. Lett. 82:3165 (2003)) as well as hybrid miniband configurations with optical-phonon scattering (G. Scalari, N. Hoyler, M. Giovannini, and J. Faist, Appl. Phys. Lett. 86:181101 (2005)), have also been pursued. Oscillator strengths for miniband configurations are sometimes listed higher than their LO-phonon configuration counterparts; however, this is somewhat offset since their section lengths are about twice as long as compared to LO-phonon configurations. Miniband configurations can also be more susceptible to thermal back filling.
The importance of improving the injector efficiency can be seen by the following approximate 2D population inversion relation:
where η is the injection efficiency, e=1.602 176 53(14)×10−19 Coul., J is the current density, Δn2D is the 2D population inversion, and the state lifetimes are represented by τ. The population inversion can be improved by increasing the injection efficiency, having a long upper state lifetime, and by having τ1<<τ21.
It is to be understood that the foregoing and the following description are exemplary and explanatory only and are not to be viewed as being restrictive of the invention, as claimed.
Before beginning with the description of some of the embodiments, it is noted that, for illustrative purposes, a Type I bandgap alignment (where the barrier heights in the conduction band are controlled by the material bandgap) is assumed in this specification, including the claims, and drawings.
The term “quantum well” is known in the art. As used herein, consistently with the usage in the art, a “quantum well”, formed in the conduction band of a semiconductor construct, refers to a planar semiconductor region sandwiched between two planar semiconductor regions (typically referred to as barrier layers) having a different bandgap, where the bandgap of the sandwiched region is smaller than the bandgaps of the barrier layers (for square wells the barrier layers usually have the same bandgap). The spacing between the barrier layers, and consequently the thickness of the quantum well layer (the quantum well layer is the “sandwiched region”), is selected such that charge carriers residing in the quantum well layer exhibit quantum effects.
The term “step quantum well” (referred to in this specification including the claims as “step well”), formed in the conduction band of a semiconductor construct, as used herein, describes a planar semiconductor region, having at least two semiconductor layers sandwiched between two planar semiconductor regions (barrier layers), where: 1) each of the at least two semiconductor layers comprising the sandwiched semiconductor region having a bandgap that is different than the bandgap of at least one of the other at least two semiconductor layers in the sandwiched semiconductor region; and 2) each of the at least two semiconductor layers comprising the sandwiched region having a bandgap that is smaller than the bandgap of the barrier layers (which often have the same bandgap). Any sandwiched semiconductor layer having a bandgap greater than the bandgap of the sandwiched semiconductor layer having the smallest bandgap is considered to be a “step”.
A Quantum Cascade (QC) structure constructed in accordance with the principles of the invention includes an active lasing region generally formed as a semiconductor heterostructure having a plurality of cascaded nominally identical lasing sections, which are functionally associated in series. The number of the lasing sections is typically about 200 sections.
In some embodiments, the heterostructure of at least one lasing section of an embodiment of a terahertz QC structure includes at least one quantum well, where at least one of the at least one quantum wells is a step well capable of forming at least three states (upper, middle, and lower). Note that in some embodiments employing a step well injector, it is possible that less than three states are formed within the step well. The heterostructure of some embodiments of a terahertz QC structure has only one quantum well per lasing section when that one quantum well is a step well.
An exemplary embodiment of a step well in a QC structure is formed as an AlxGa1-xAs heterostructure, where at least two Al compositions are used. However, in other embodiments, a step well in a QC structure is formed using more than two Al compositions, as shown in the embodiments of
The active region may be formed into a waveguide by any known means. Two commonly used waveguide approaches are the metal-metal and surface-plasmon waveguides. The facets of the waveguide and resonator can be coated with a high reflectivity coating or left uncoated. The laser is formed by growing N sections and processing the sample into a waveguide/resonator. Typically, the active region thickness is on the order of about 10 μm and guide widths are on the order of about 50 to about 200 μm, depending on the type of waveguide used.
Considering the surface plasmon waveguide first, the side contacts spacing is generally set to about 50 nm to keep the mode from coupling to avoid higher waveguide loss. In order to have ohmic contacts, the top contact layers are generally doped (for example about 60 nm thick and doped at 5×1018 cm−3). The optimal lower plasma layer thickness can be determined by computing the threshold gain=(αm+αw)Γ, where
αm=−1/2 ln(R1R2) is the mirror loss, with R1 and R2 being the intensity reflectivity, (1)
αw is the waveguide loss,
Γ is the confinement factor,
as a function of plasma layer thickness for different doping concentrations and mirror losses (to corresponding resonator lengths).
For a metal-metal waveguide configuration, the top and lower contact layers can be doped to generate ohmic contacts, for example about 60 nm thick (10 and 50 nm layers doped at 5×1019 and 5×1018 cm−3, and the lower contact may also use a LTG GaAs layer). For the metal-metal waveguides, the threshold gains are often less than the surface plasmon guides, with the confinement factors, Γ, is equal to about 1, but generally have lower output coupling factors
αm/(αm+αw)). (2)
Although the figures illustrate no more than two lasing sections, those having ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that the exemplary illustrations are applicable to other lasing sections in the active region. Further, though certain conduction band heights and energy states (or levels) are illustrated, the illustrated conduction band heights and energy levels were selected for exemplary purposes, and those having ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that the conduction band heights and energy levels of a step quantum well QC structure can vary in accordance with the principles of the invention.
ωLO. This ensures fast depopulation of state E2 via LO-phonon scattering, with a scattering rate lifetime of about 0.5 psec. Mini-band scattering between the doublet lower state, E1 and E0, takes place, with injection into the upper lasing state, E3, of the next adjacent section. For simplicity, to describe injection from one lasing section into another, we herein describe injection from lasing section n into lasing section n+1 as representative. A similar injection occurs in the remainder of the N lasing sections of the N lasing section step well QC structure. If we consider the injection of electrons from lasing section n into lasing section n+1, the step reduces unwanted injection into state E2 of lasing section n+1 from the lower states E1 and E0 of lasing section n. Monte Carlo simulations, (taking into account electron-electron, LO-phonon, impurity, and interface roughness scattering), of these types of structures yields injection efficiencies of about 90% from the doublet states E1 and E0 of lasing section n to state E3 of lasing section n+1. Since these are intrawell transitions, the scattering rates computed are relatively fast. The radiative transition is also an intrawell transition. One implementation of an embodiment of a step well quantum cascade laser illustrated in
/mω|<f|d/dx|i>|2=0.94 at 9.9 kV/cm (53.6 mV/section), where
=6.582 119 15(56)×10−22 MeV sec, (3)
m=electron effective mass,
ω=angular frequency,
f=the final state,
i=the initial state.
A simulation of this structure yields a peak gain=2e22Δn3D/m2ενωFWHM|<f|d/dx|i>|2˜87 cm−1, where (4)
=6.582 119 15(56)×10−22 MeV sec,
m=electron effective mass,
ω=angular frequency,
Δn3D=3D population inversion,
e=1.602 176 53(14)×10−19 Coul.,
v=velocity magnitude (speed of light in medium),
FWHM=full width half maximum,
ε=permittivity,
f=the final state,
i=the initial state.
(W. Freeman and G. Karunasiri, Proc. SPIE 7311, 73110V (2009).
While the invention has been described, disclosed, illustrated and shown in various terms of certain embodiments or modifications, the scope of the invention is not intended to be, nor should it be deemed to be, limited thereby and such other modifications or embodiments as may be suggested by the teachings herein are particularly reserved especially as they fall within the breadth and scope of the claims here appended.
This application claims priority to the prior filed U.S. provisional application having Application Number 61095553, filed on Sep. 9, 2008.
The invention described herein may be manufactured and used by or for the government of the United States of America for governmental purposes without the payment of any royalties thereon or therefore.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5023879 | Wang et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5509025 | Capasso et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
6819696 | Belenky et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
7158545 | Hu et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
20050058168 | Hu et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20060039431 | Sekiguchi et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20070248131 | Botez et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61095553 | Sep 2008 | US |