A traditional form of a boat hull is a displacement hull, which is characterized by a rounded bilge. Buoyancy, or lift, is generated by the amount of water the hull displaces as it moves through the water. Wave-making resistance, resulting from the formation of a bow wave, is typically the dominant form of drag for displacement hulls. As the speed of the boat increases, the length, height and speed of the generated bow wave increases as well. The wave-making resistance may increase exponentially until the wavelength of the bow wave is equal to the waterline length of the boat. At this point, the boat may be trapped climbing the trough of its own large bow wave, resulting in a virtual barrier to speed increase.
Planing hulls are designed to overcome displacement hull speed by skimming across the surface of the water. At lower speeds, wave-making resistance is still the dominant form of drag. At higher speeds, planing hulls are designed to generate hydrodynamic lift forces proportional to the speed of the boat. The total lift felt by the hull is a combination of the hydrodynamic lift and hydrostatic lift. Hydrodynamic lift is caused by the water passing over the planing surface. Hydrostatic lift is a function of the underwater volume of the hull. At lower speeds, planing hulls are primarily supported by buoyant, hydrostatic forces. As speed increases, hydrodynamic lift is generated and hydrostatic forces acting on the hull gradually decrease. As the boat transitions into a planing regime, the hull rises above its static flotation level and trims up by the bow, thereby reducing the wetted surface significantly. Hydrodynamic lift may continue to increase until the hydrostatic force felt by the hull is negligible, and the boat is fully planing.
Various embodiments are disclosed herein for an improved stepped cambered planing hull for a boat that may include a swept back cambered planing surface having a non-linear distribution of camber to generate hydrodynamic lift with reduced drag. In some embodiments, the non-linear distribution of camber along the swept back cambered planing surface may enable stepped cambered planing hulls having high deadrise (i.e., greater than 15 degrees). In some embodiments, the stepped cambered planing hull may include a hydrofoil that generates further hydrodynamic lift by piercing the free surface wake produced by the swept back cambered planing surface. In some embodiments, the stepped cambered planing hull may have external bottom surfaces adapted at the after-body and transom to accommodate a distinctive profile of the free surface wake produced by the swept back cambered planing surface, thereby reducing wetting and hull slamming. In some embodiments, the stepped cambered planing hull may include an adjustable interceptor blade to regulate hydrodynamic lift at low speeds or to ensure an optimal dynamic trim angle in a wide range of speeds.
In some embodiments, the planning hull for a boat, may include a fore-body portion, a swept back cambered portion having an external bottom surface with a non-linear distribution of camber, an after-body portion and a step that vertically offsets the after-body portion from the swept back cambered portion towards and interior of the planning hull. The swept back cambered portion may extend from the fore-body portion. In some embodiments, the swept back cambered portion may be a V-shaped swept back cambered portion. In some embodiments, the fore-body portion of the planing hull may have a deadrise angle equal to or greater than fifteen degrees.
In some embodiments, the camber of the external bottom surface may vary transversely across the swept back cambered portion in amplitude, phase, or any combination thereof. In some embodiments, the camber of the external bottom surface may have a flat portion, a rising curved portion and falling curved portion. In some embodiments, the camber of the eternal bottom surface may be a Johnson three term camber.
In some embodiments, the planing hull may include a transom having an external bottom surface of the transom with a W-shaped cross sectional profile. In some embodiments, an external bottom surface of the after-body portion may have a cross section profile, wherein the cross section profile transitions from the W-shaped cross sectional profile of the transom to a V-shaped cross section profile along a longitudinal length of the after-body portion.
In some embodiments, the planing hull may include a hydrofoil attached or adjacent to a transom of the planning hull. In some embodiments, the hydrofoil may be a U-shaped hydrofoil. In some embodiments, the hydrofoil may be a W-shaped hydrofoil.
In some embodiments, the planing hull may further include an interceptor blade positioned at or adjacent to the step that may be automatically lowered to pierce the free water surface at non-planing speeds. In some embodiments, the interceptor blade may be automatically lowered to a depth that exceeds a height of the step to increase a size of the swept back cambered portion. In some embodiments, the interceptor blade may be automatically raised or retracted at planing speeds. In some embodiments, the interceptor blade may conform to and extend for the entire length of a trailing edge of the cambered planing portion. In some embodiments, the interceptor blade may conform to and extend for a truncated length of a trailing edge of the cambered planing portion.
The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated herein and constitute part of this specification, illustrate exemplary embodiments, and together with the general description given above and the detailed description given below, serve to explain the features of the various embodiments.
Various embodiments will be described in detail with reference to the accompanying drawings. Wherever possible, the same reference numbers will be used throughout the drawings to refer to the same or like parts. References made to particular examples and implementations are for illustrative purposes, and are not intended to limit the scope of the claims.
Various embodiments are disclosed herein for an improved stepped cambered planing hull that may include a swept back cambered planing surface having a non-linear distribution of camber configured to generate hydrodynamic lift with reduced drag. In some embodiments, the non-linear distribution of camber along the swept back cambered planing surface may enable stepped cambered planing hulls having high deadrise (i.e., greater than 15 degrees). In some embodiments, the stepped cambered planing hull may include one or more hydrofoils positioned near the stern configured to generate further hydrodynamic lift by piercing the free surface wake produced by the swept back cambered planing surface. In some embodiments, the stepped cambered planing hull may have external bottom surfaces adapted at the after-body and transom to accommodate the profile of the free surface wake produced by the swept back cambered planing surface, thereby reducing wetting and hull slamming when the hull is planing. In some embodiments, the stepped cambered planing hull may include an adjustable interceptor blade on an aft portion of the swept back cambered planing surface that is configured to regulate hydrodynamic lift, particularly at low speeds, and/or to ensure an optimal dynamic trim angle in a wide range of speeds.
The fore-body portion 110 may form the bow or a portion thereof. In some embodiments, the fore-body portion 110 may form a V-shaped bow or portion thereof having a high deadrise (e.g., 15 degrees or more). The fore-body portion 110 may extend from the tip of the bow to a leading edge 122 of the swept back cambered portion 120. In some embodiments, the fore-body portion 110 may include spray rails 112 arranged on an external bottom surface, such that at least one end of each spray rail is angled towards the swept back cambered portion 120 to force water flow towards that region.
In some embodiments, the swept back cambered portion 120 may be bounded in a longitudinal direction between a leading edge 122 and a trailing edge 124 and in a transverse direction by the sides of the hull. In some embodiments, the swept back cambered portion 120 may be V-shaped as shown in
In some embodiments, the step 130 may be positioned between the cambered portion 120 and the after-body portion 140 to vertically offset the after-body portion 140 towards an interior of the hull. In some embodiments, a first end of the step 130 may be joined to the trailing edge 124 of the swept back cambered portion and a second end of the step 130 may be joined to a leading edge of the after-body portion 140. Embodiments of the step 130 are disclosed with reference to
In some embodiments, the after-body portion 140 may extend aft of the step 130 towards the transom 150. In some embodiments, the after-body portion 140 and the transom 150 may have an external bottom surface adapted to accommodate the profile of the free surface wave that is produced by the swept back cambered portion 120 when the hull is planing. The profile of the free surface wave may be distinctive of the swept back cambered portion 120 shape. Embodiments of the external bottom surface of the after-body portion 140 and the transom 150 are disclosed with reference to
In some embodiments, a hydrofoil 160 may be attached to or positioned at or near the transom 150 to provide additional hydrodynamic lift on the afterbody. In some embodiments, the hydrofoil 160 may be actuated by a servomechanism, and controlled to provide trim control and stability. Embodiments of the hydrofoil 160 are disclosed with reference to
The swept back cambered portion 120 may have an external bottom surface with a non-linear distribution of camber.
In some embodiments, the step 130 may extend transversely across the entire length of the bottom surface of the planing hull 100. In some embodiments, the step 130 may have a shape that conforms to the shape of the trailing edge 124 of the swept back cambered portion 120. For example, in some embodiments, the step 130 may be a V-shaped step that conforms to a V-shaped trailing edge 124 of the swept back cambered portion 120.
In some embodiments, the height of the step 130 may be configured to allow full ventilation of the after-body portion 140 of the hull at higher speeds. In some embodiments, the step height may include an additional allowance to account for the effect of a change in the dynamic trim and sinkage of the hull at lower speeds, and/or pitching of the hull at lower sea states. For example, as shown in
For example, in some embodiments, the transom 150 may be formed with a W-shaped profile 152 that extends along the external bottom surface of the transom and into a first external bottom surface 140a of the after-body portion 140. The W-shaped profile 152 of the first external bottom surface 140a may then gradually transition into a V-shaped profile of a second external bottom surface 140b.
In some embodiments, the hydrofoil 160 may be a seamless V-shaped hydrofoil having two opposing hydrofoil elements 602a, 602b connected to a vertex 604 having a flattened central portion. An embodiment of a seamless V-shaped hydrofoil is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 8,820,260, the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference for details related to V-shaped hydrofoils.
In some embodiments, the hydrofoil 160 may be a seamless U-shaped hydrofoil having two opposing hydrofoil elements that connect at a curved central portion. In some embodiments, the hydrofoil 160 may also be a seamless W-shaped hydrofoil that includes multiple hydrofoil elements (e.g., two inner hydrofoil elements and two outer hydrofoil elements) interconnected to form a W-shaped cross section. In some embodiments (not shown), the hydrofoil 160 may include two separate (i.e., not seamless) surface piercing, super cavitating hydrofoils that may extend outwardly from the opposite sides of the after-body portion 140 adjacent to the transom 150. In some embodiments (not shown), the hydrofoil 160 may include two separate (i.e., not seamless) surface piercing, super cavitating hydrofoils that extend inwardly from the opposite sides of the after-body portion 140 adjacent to the transom 150.
In some embodiments, as shown in
The preceding description of the disclosed embodiments is provided to enable any person skilled in the art to make or use the claims. Various modifications to these embodiments will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art, and the generic principles defined herein may be applied to other embodiments without departing from the scope of the claims. Thus, the present disclosure is not intended to be limited to the embodiments shown herein but is to be accorded the widest scope consistent with the following claims and the principles and novel features disclosed herein.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/293,380, filed on Feb. 10, 2016 and U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/333,333, filed on May 9, 2016, the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference/
This invention was made with Government support under Grant No. N00014-13-1-0332 awarded by the Office of Naval Research. The Government has certain rights in the invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3651775 | Kock | Mar 1972 | A |
6666160 | Orneblad | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6925953 | Batista | Aug 2005 | B1 |
7870830 | Bogard et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
8820260 | Brizzolara | Sep 2014 | B2 |
20020100407 | Biddison | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20060124042 | Schulz | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20080210150 | Loui et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2014200407 | Dec 2014 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Brizzolara, et al., “Designing of V-Stepped Planing Hulls: CFD in Support of Traditional Semi-Empirical Methods” In Proceedings of the Design and Construction of Super and Mega Yachts International Conference, Genoa, Italy, 8 pages, (May 8-9, 2013). |
Donald L. Blount and Louis T. Codega, “Dynamic stability of planing boats”, Marine Technology and SNAME news, vol. 29(1): pp. 4-12, (1992). |
Stefano Brizzolara and Alessandro Federici, “Hydrodynamic analysis of interceptors with CFD methods”, Int. Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Fast Sea Transportation, vol. 3, pp. 49-56, (2003). |
Stefano Brizzolara, “CFD modeling of planing hulls with partially ventilated bottom”, In the William Froude Conference: Advances in Theoretical and Applied Hydrodynamics—Past and Future, 18 pages, (Nov. 24-25, 2010). |
Stefano Brizzolara and Francesco Serra, “Accuracy of CFD codes in the prediction of planing surfaces hydrodynamic characteristics”, In 2nd International Conference on Marine Research and Transportation, pp. 147-159, (Jun. 2007). |
Stefano Brizzolara and Diego Villa, “CFD simulations of planing hulls”, In 7th International Conference on High-Performance Marine Vehicles, 9 pages, (Oct. 13-15, 2010). |
Eugene P. Clement, “A configuration for a stepped planing boat having minimum drag (dynaplane boat)”, retrieved Apr. 11, 2017 from “http://www.foils.org/02_Papers%20dnloads/Clement%20dynaplane.PDF”, 76 pages, (2006). |
Leon Alexander Faison, “Design of a high speed planing hull with a cambered step and surface piercing hydrofoils”, Master's thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 82 pages, (2014). |
Daniel Savitsky, “Hydrodynamic design of planing hulls”, Marine Technology, 1(1), pp. 71-95, (1964). |
Daniel Savitsky, “Planing craft”, Naval Engineers Journal, 97(2), pp. 113-141, (1985). |
Daniel Savitsky and P Ward Brown, “Procedures for hydrodynamic evaluation of planing hulls in smooth and rough water”, Mahn Technology. 13(4), pp. 381-400, (Oct. 1976). |
Kowalyshyn D. H. and Metcalf B. “A USCG Systematic Series of High Speed Planing Hulls”, SNAME Transactions, vol. 114, pp. 268-309, (2006). |
Stefano Brizzolara, et al., “High Deadrise Stepped Cambered Planing Hulls with Hydrofoils: SCPH2. A Proof of Concept”, The Fifth Chesapeake Power Boat Symposium, 10 pages, (Jun. 2016). |
International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority in International Application No. PCT/US17/17121 dated May 30, 2017. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180001963 A1 | Jan 2018 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62333333 | May 2016 | US | |
62293380 | Feb 2016 | US |