Steviol glycoside compositions

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 11647771
  • Patent Number
    11,647,771
  • Date Filed
    Wednesday, October 26, 2016
    7 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, May 16, 2023
    a year ago
Abstract
Steviol glycoside compositions having improved sweetness and flavor profiles are described.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

The invention is directed to the positive impact of minor steviol glycosides on the sweetness profile of Stevia sweeteners.


Sugar alternatives are receiving increasing attention due to awareness of many diseases in conjunction with consumption of high-sugar foods and beverages. However, many artificial sweeteners such as dulcin, sodium cyclamate and saccharin were banned or restricted in some countries due to concerns on their safety. Therefore non-caloric sweeteners of natural origin are becoming increasingly popular. The sweet herb Stevia rebaudiana produces a number of diterpene glycosides which feature high intensity sweetness and sensory properties superior to those of many other high potency sweeteners.



Stevia rebaudiana is a plant species belonging to the Astracea family, and is native to South America and cultivated now in many parts of the world (Gardana et al., 2003; Koyama et al., 2003; Carakostas et al., 2008). Stevia leaves are naturally sweet, and have been used for sweetening food products for hundreds of years in South America (Soejarto et al., 1982). Extracts of Stevia rebaudiana have been used commercially to sweeten foods in Japan and other Southeast Asian countries for a number of years (Koyama et al., 2003). As a product of nature, the Stevia plant leaves contain different sweet tasting components, called steviol glycosides. Reportedly, more than 40 steviol glycosides have been identified that are typically present in the Stevia leaf extract (Ceunen and Geuns, 2013; Chaturvedula et al., 2011a,b,c; Chaturvedula and Prakash, 2011a,b; Ohta et al., 2010). Each of these steviol glycosides has its own unique taste profile and sweetness intensity, which can be up to 350 times sweeter than sugar, but all share a similar molecular structure where different sugar moieties are attached to aglycone steviol (an ent-kaurene-type diterpene). The generic structure of the steviol glycosides is presented in FIG. 1.


Rebaudioside A and stevioside have garnered the most commercial interest and have been extensively studied and characterized in terms of their suitability as commercial high intensity sweeteners. Stability studies in carbonated beverages confirmed their heat and pH stability (Chang S. S., Cook, J. M. (1983) Stability studies of stevioside and rebaudioside A in carbonated beverages. J. Agric. Food Chem. 31: 409-412.)


Steviol glycosides differ from each other not only by molecular structure, but also by their taste properties. Usually stevioside is found to be 110-270 times sweeter than sucrose and rebaudioside A is between 150 and 320 times sweeter than sucrose. Rebaudioside A has the least astringent, the least bitter, and the least persistent aftertaste thus possessing the most favorable sensory attributes in major steviol glycosides (Tanaka O. (1987) Improvement of taste of natural sweeteners. Pure Appl. Chem. 69:675-683; Phillips K. C. (1989) Stevia: steps in developing a new sweetener. In: Grenby T. H. ed. Developments in sweeteners, vol. 3. Elsevier Applied Science, London. 1-43.)


By the early 21st century, only a limited number of the chemical structures of steviol glycosides in Stevia rebaudiana have been characterized including stevioside, rebaudioside A-F, dulcoside A, and steviolbioside (Ceunen and Geuns, 2013). In recent years, many minor steviol glycosides with diverse chemical structures, have been reported from the leaves of Stevia rebaudiana (Chaturvedula et al., 2011a,b,c; Chaturvedula and Prakash, 2011 a,b). These diverse steviol glycosides, which are ent-kaurene-type diterpenes, are connected to various sugars such as glucose, rhamnose, xylose, fructose and deoxy glucose at C-13 and C-19 positions via 1,2-; 1,3-; 1,4- or 1,6-α or β-glycosidic linkages. The identity and grouping of various steviol glycosides is summarized in Table 1. Due to the large number of steviol glycosides, Table 1 lists the steviol glycosides in 5 groups depending on the sugar moieties connected to the steviol backbone and identified with abbreviated compositional names.

    • Glucosyl steviol family: comprising only steviol and glucose residues. This group can be presented by general formula “SvGn”, wherein Sv is the steviol and G is glucose.
    • Rhamnosyl steviol family: comprising steviol, rhamose and glucose residues. This group can be presented by general formula “SvR1Gn”, wherein R is the Rhamnose.
    • Xylosyl steviol family: comprising steviol, xylose and glucose residues. This group can be presented by general formula “SvX1Gn”, wherein X is the Xylose.
    • Fructosyl steviol family: comprising steviol, fructose and glucose residues. This group can be presented by general formula “SvF1Gn”, wherein F is the Fructose.
    • Deoxyglucose steviol family: comprising steviol, deoxyglucose and glucose residue. This group can be presented by general formula SvdG1Gn.













TABLE 1






Common
Abbr.




#
Name
Formula
R1
R2















1) Steviol + Glucose (SvGn)











1.1
Steviolmonoside
SvG1
H
Glcβ1-


1.2
Steviol-19-O-β-
SvG1
Glcβ1-
H



D-glucoside


1.3
Rubusoside
SvG2
Glcβ1-
Glcβ1-


1.4
Steviolbioside
SvG2
H
Glcβ(1-2)Glcβ1-


1.5
Stevioside
SvG3
Glcβ1-
Glcβ(1-2)Glcβ1-


1.6
Stevioside A
SvG3
Glcβ(1-2)Glcβ1-
Glcβ1-


1.7
Rebaudioside B
SvG3
H
Glcβ(1-2)[Glcβ(1-3)]Glcβ1-


1.8
Rebaudioside G
SvG3
Glcβ1-
Glcβ(1-3)Glcβ1-


1.9
Stevioside B
SvG3
Glcβ(1-3)Glcβ1-
Glcβ1-


1.10
Rebaudioside E
SvG4
Glcβ(1-2)Glcβ1-
Glcβ(1-2)Glcβ1-


1.11
Rebaudioside A
SvG4
Glcβ1-
Glcβ(1-2)[Glcβ(1-3)]Glcβ1-


1.12
Rebaudioside
SvG4
Glcβ1-
Glcβ(1-6)Glcβ(1-2)Glcβ1-



A2


1.13
Rebaudioside D
SvG5
Glcβ(1-2)Glcβ1-
Glcβ(1-2)[Glcβ(1-3)]Glcβ1-


1.14
Rebaudioside I
SvG5
Glcβ(1-3)Glcβ1-
Glcβ(1-2)[Glcβ(1-3)]Glcβ1-


1.15
Rebaudioside L
SvG5
Glcβ1-
Glcβ(1-6)Glcβ(1-2)[Glcβ(1-






3)]Glcβ1-


1.16
Rebaudioside
SvG5
Glcα(1-2)Glcα(1-
Glcβ(1-2)Glcβ1-



Q2

4)Glcβ1-


1.17
Rebaudioside Q
SvG5
Glcβ1-
Glcα(1-4)Glcβ(1-2)[Glcβ(1-






3)]Glcβ1-


1.18
Rebaudioside I2
SvG5
Glcβ1-
Glcα(1-3)Glcβ(1-2)[Glcβ(1-






3)]Glcβ1-


1.19
Rebaudioside
SvG5
Glcβ1-
Glcα(1-4)Glcβ(1-3)[Glcβ(1-



Q3


2)]Glcβ1-


1.20
Rebaudioside I3
SvG5
Glcβ(1-2)[Glcβ(1-
Glcβ(1-2)Glcβ1-





6)]Glcβ1-


1.21
Rebaudioside M
SvG6
Glcβ(1-2)[Glcβ (1-
Glcβ(1-2)[Glcβ(1-3)]Glcβ1-





3)]Glcβ1-







2) Steviol + Rhamnose + Glucose (SvR1Gn)











2.1
Dulcoside A
SvR1G2
Glcβ1-
Rhaα(1-2)Glcβ1-


2.2
Dulcoside B
SvR1G2
H
Rhaα(1-2)[Glcβ(1-3)]Glcβ1-


2.3
Rebaudioside C
SvR1G3
Glcβ1-
Rhaα(1-2)[Glcβ(1-3)]Glcβ1-


2.4
Rebaudioside C
SvR1G3
Rhaα(1-2)Glcβ1-
Glcβ(1-3)Glcβ1-



(isomer)


2.5
Rebaudioside H
SvR1G4
Glcβ1-
Glcβ(1-3)Rhaβ(1-2)[Glcβ(1-






3)]Glcβ1-


2.6
Rebaudioside K
SvR1G4
Glcβ(1-2)Glcβ1-
Rhaα(1-2)[Glcβ(1-3)]Glcβ1-


2.7
Rebaudioside J
SvR1G4
Rhaα(1-2)Glcβ1-
Glcβ(1-2)[Glcβ(1-3)]Glcβ1-


2.8
Rebaudioside N
SvR1G5
Rhaα(1-2)[Glcβ(1-
Glcβ(1-2)[Glcβ(1-3)]Glcβ1-





3)]Glcβ1-


2.9
Rebaudioside O
SvR1G6
Glcβ(1-3)Rhaα(1-
Glcβ(1-2)[Glcβ(1-3)]Glcβ1-





2)[Glcβ(1-





3)]Glcβ1-







3) Steviol + Xylose + Glucose (SvX1Gn)











3.1
Stevioside F
SvX1G2
Glcβ1-
Xylβ(1-2)Glcβ1-


3.2
Rebaudioside F
SvX1G3
Glcβ1-
Xylβ(1-2)[Glc(1-3)]Glcβ1-


3.3
Rebaudioside
SvX1G3
Glcβ1-
Glcβ(1-2)[Xylβ(1-3)]Glcβ1-



F2


3.4
Rebaudioside
SvX1G3
Xylβ(1-6)Glcβ1-
Glcβ(1-2)Glcβ1-



F3







4) Steviol + Fructose + Glucose (SvF1Gn)











4.1
Rebaudioside
SvF1G3
Glcβ1-
Glcβ(1-2)[Fruβ(1-3)]Glcβ1-



A3







5) Steviol + deoxyGlucose + Glucose (SvdG1Gn)











5.1
Stevioside D
SvdG1G2
Glcβ1-
6-deoxyGlcβ(1-2)Glcβ1-


5.2
Stevisoide E
SvdG1G3
Glcβ1-
6-deoxyGlcβ(1-2)[Glcβ(1-






3)]Glcβ1-


5.3
Stevioside E2
SvdG1G3
6-deoxyGlcβ1-
Glcβ(1-2)[Glcβ(1-3)]Glcβ1-









SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention is directed to improving the sweetness profile of steviol glycoside sweeteners, such as stevioside and Rebaudioside A (Reb A). It was unexpectedly discovered that certain minor steviol glycosides have a favorable impact on the sweetness profile of other steviol glycosides, including Rebaudioside D (Reb D) and Rebaudioside M (Reb M). These minor steviol glycosides, although present in small amounts, demonstrate statistically significant positive impacts on the sweetness profile of Stevia sweeteners. As used herein, a minor steviol glycoside is one that is present in a composition in an amount less than 5%, or less than 3%.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 shows the generic structure of steviol glycosides.



FIG. 2a shows the structure of Rebaudioside N. FIG. 2b shows the structure of Rebaudioside O.



FIG. 3a is a bar graph showing the results of a taste panel. The first bars represent the results from tasting a highly purified (at least 97% pure) Rebaudioside A composition in acidified water. The second bars represent the results from tasting a fructosylated Rebaudioside A composition in acidified water.



FIG. 3b is a bar graph showing the results of a taste panel. The first bars represent the results from tasting a diet lemon-lime carbonated soft drink including a highly purified Reb M/Reb D blend, wherein the blend includes 50% Reb M and 50% Reb D by weight. The second bars represent the results from tasting a diet lemon-lime carbonated soft drink including a fructosylated Rebaudioside A composition.



FIG. 4a is a bar graph showing the results of a taste panel. The first bars represent the results from tasting a highly purified (at least 97% pure) Rebaudioside A composition in acidified water. The second bars represent the results from tasting a glycosylated minor steviol glycoside composition in acidified water, wherein the glycosylated minor steviol glycoside composition contains 19% glycosylated Reb Q by weight and 18% glycosylated Reb R by weight.



FIG. 4b is a bar graph showing the results of a taste panel. The first bars represent the results from tasting a diet lemon-lime carbonated soft drink including a highly purified Reb M/Reb D blend, wherein the blend includes 50% Reb M and 50% Reb D by weight. The second bars represent the results from tasting a diet lemon-lime carbonated soft drink including a glycosylated minor steviol glycoside composition in acidified water, wherein the glycosylated minor steviol glycoside composition contains 19% glycosylated Reb Q by weight and 18% glycosylated Reb R by weight.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Steviol glycoside compositions including minor glycosides (SG compositions), such as Rebaudioside N and Rebaudioside O, were found to have a positive impact on the sweetness profile of Stevia sweeteners. An exemplary steviol glycoside composition is described in Table 2.









TABLE 2







Steviol Glycoside Composition (SG Composition)













Steviol Glycoside



Molecules
Structure
Composition















Reb D
SvG5
63.95



Reb M
SvG6
25.37



Reb N
SvR1G5
2.95



Reb O
SvR1G6
1.37



Reb A
SvG4
1.32



Reb E
SvG4
0.86



Reb B
SvG3
0.22



Stevioside
SvG3
0.03



Reb C
SvR1G3
0.01



Reb F
SvX1G3
0



Dulcoside A
SvR1G2
0



Rubusoside
SvG2
0



Steviolbioside
SvG2
0



Total Steviol Glycosides

96.07











Comparison of Reb D/Reb M Blends to Steviol Glycoside Compositions


Example 1: Acidified Water—5 Brix Target

15 panelists tested the sample solutions, as summarized in Table 3:









TABLE 3







Acidified water 5 brix target - SG Composition vs Reb D and Reb M


blends


Summary of Mean-Scores, P-Values, and Significance















200 ppm of






200 ppm of
70/30 Reb




SG
D/Reb M


Attribute
5% Sugar
Composition
blend
P-Value
Sig





Sweetness
4.91
4.86
4.98
0.0997



Bitterness
b
ab
a
0.0083
***



0.75
0.98
1.23


Astringency
b
b
a
0.0035
***



0.84
1.02
1.77


Acidity
c
b
a
0.0012
***



0.99
1.41
1.99


Off-Note
b
b
a
0.0081
***


(Metallic/
0.52
0.61
1.13


Licorice)


Sweet
c
b
a
0.0046
***


Aftertaste
0.56
0.99
1.38


Bitter
0.33
0.37
0.53
0.5487
NS


Aftertaste


Overall Liking
a
b
b
0.1964
*



4.96
4.53
4.46





*= 80% confidence interval,


**= 90% Confidence interval,


***= 95% Confidence interval






As can be seen, the steviol glycoside composition (SG composition) has many attributes that are more similar to a 5% sugar solution than a Reb D/Reb M blend, and the overall liking is greater than the Reb D/Reb M blend. Steviol glycoside compositions with minor glycosides and a 70/30 Reb D/M blend were parity in sweetness. The Reb D/Reb M 70/30 blend had significantly higher astringency, acidity, off-notes, and sweet aftertaste compared to the SG composition. The two samples have significantly different flavor profiles.


Example 2: Acidified Water—10 Brix Target

The same test was done as in Example 1, but with a 10 Brix target. 13 panelists tested the solutions, as summarized in Table 4.









TABLE 4







Acidified water 10 brix target - SG Composition vs Reb D and Reb M


blends


Summary of Mean-Scores, P-Values, and Significance














900 ppm
900 ppm of





10%
of SG
70/30
P-


Attribute
Sugar
Composition
Reb D/Reb M
Value
Sig





Sweetness
8.45
8.62
8.45
0.8794
NS


Bitterness
b
a
a
0.0147
***



0.55
2.18
1.72


Astringency
b
a
a
0.0762
**



0.92
1.55
1.71


Acidity
b
a
a
0.0508
**



1.08
1.56
1.61


Off-Note
b
a
a
0.0028
***


(Metallic/
0.51
1.11
1.34


Licorice)


Sweet Aftertaste
c
b
a
0.0029
***



1.08
1.75
2.25


Bitter Aftertaste
b
a
a
0.0464
***



0.37
0.62
0.82


Overall Liking
a
b
b
0.0091
***



6.34
4.6
4.65





*= 80% confidence interval,


**= 90% Confidence interval,


***= 95% Confidence interval






In this test, the steviol glycoside composition and the Reb D/Reb M blend were parity in sweetness. The 70/30 blend also had significantly higher sweet aftertaste compared to the steviol glycoside composition.


While not intending to be bound by theory, it is believed that Rebaudioside N and Rebaudioside O, while present in minor amounts in the steviol glycoside composition, have a favorable impact on the flavor and sweetness profile of the steviol glycoside composition, particularly at the 5 Brix target level. The structures of Rebaudioside N and Rebaudioside O are shown in FIGS. 2a and 2b. However, certain advantages were observed even at the 10 Brix target, making these minor steviol glycosides relevant in the improvement of sweetness profiles.


Example 3: Fructosylated Steviol Glycosides

It was discovered that adding one or more fructose molecules to rebaudioside A provides flavor and sweetness profile advantages. It is believed that fructosylation of rebaudioside A or other steviol glycosides, including minor steviol glycosides, can provide characteristics that are similar to or even better than highly purified steviol glycosides. Rebaudioside A was subjected to a glycosylation process to add fructose to the G1 and G2 positions, and compared to a highly purified rebaudioside A composition in acidified water, and a highly purified Reb M/Reb D blend in a diet lemon-lime carbonated soft drink. The results from a trained test panel are shown in FIGS. 3a and 3b.


Example 4: Glycosylated Minor Steviol Glycosides

It was discovered that in addition to their favorable impact on the flavor and sweetness profiles of steviol glycoside compositions, the impact of minor glycosides can be improved when they are glycosylated. Glycosylated steviol glycosides (GSG) have one or more glycoside moieties attached to the steviol glycoside backbone, and have been found to have a favorable impact on attributes such as bitterness, sweetness aftertaste, etc. on steviol glycoside compositions. Glycosylated minor steviol glycosides can improve the flavor and sweetness profiles of steviol glycoside compositions to be similar to or even surpass the flavor and sweetness profiles of highly purified steviol glycosides, thereby providing an efficient and effective alternative to highly purified steviol glycosides.


The glycoside moiety can be any monosaccharide, disaccharide, or oligosaccharide, such as glucose, fructose, rhamnose, xylose, and the like. The glycoside moiety can be a single molecule, or can be a chain of molecules, for example, 2, 3 or 4 glucose units attached to the steviol glycoside. The glycosylation process typically results in the glycoside moiety attaching to the C-13 or C-19 position on the steviol glycoside.


In one embodiment, a rebaudioside A and minor steviol glycoside composition was glycosylated. The minor steviol glycoside content included glycosylated rebaudioside Q at about 19% by weight, and glycosylated rebaudioside R at about 18% by weight.


Acidified water and diet lemon-lime carbonated soft drink samples containing various amounts of glycosylated minor steviol glycoside composition were tested by a trained panel, and the results are shown in FIGS. 4a and 4b. As can be seen, the glycosylated minor steviol glycoside-containing composition performed nearly the same as, and in some cases better than, highly purified steviol glycoside compositions (Reb A and Reb M/Reb D) across a number of sweetness and flavor attributes.


It is to be understood that the foregoing descriptions and specific embodiments shown herein are merely illustrative of the best mode of the invention and the principles thereof, and that modifications and additions may be easily made by those skilled in the art without departing for the spirit and scope of the invention, which is therefore understood to be limited only by the scope of the appended claims.

Claims
  • 1. A steviol glycoside sweetener composition comprising a 70:30 blend of rebaudioside D and rebaudioside M, wherein the blend is present in the sweetener composition in an amount greater than 80% by weight of the composition, and wherein the steviol glycoside sweetener composition further comprises minor steviol glycosides Rebaudioside N and Rebaudioside O, each of the minor glycosides being present in the steviol glycoside sweetener composition in an amount ranging from 1% to 5% by weight of the composition.
  • 2. The steviol glycoside composition of claim 1, wherein at least one minor steviol glycoside is glycosylated.
  • 3. The composition of claim 1, wherein the minor steviol glycosides provide astringency, acidity, off-note, bitter aftertaste, and sweet aftertaste taste attributes that are more similar to a sugar solution than the blend without said minor steviol glycosides.
  • 4. The composition of claim 1, wherein the blend with the minor glycosides provides a sweetness profile more similar to a 5 Brix solution than the blend without the minor glycosides.
  • 5. The composition of claim 1, wherein the blend with the minor glycosides has a lower astringency, lower acidity, lower off-notes, lower sweet aftertaste, and lower bitterness, than the blend without the minor glycosides, relative to a 10 Brix solution.
  • 6. The composition of claim 1, wherein each of the minor glycosides is present in the steviol glycoside sweetener composition in an amount ranging from 1% to 3% by weight of the composition.
PCT Information
Filing Document Filing Date Country Kind
PCT/US2016/058834 10/26/2016 WO
Publishing Document Publishing Date Country Kind
WO2017/075034 5/4/2017 WO A
US Referenced Citations (148)
Number Name Date Kind
2500173 Gisvold Mar 1950 A
2615015 Wilson Oct 1952 A
3723410 Persinos Mar 1973 A
4082858 Morita Apr 1978 A
4112218 Inoue Sep 1978 A
4171430 Matsushita Oct 1979 A
4219571 Miyake Aug 1980 A
4361697 Dobberstein Nov 1982 A
4454290 Dubois Jun 1984 A
4590160 Nishihashi May 1986 A
4599403 Kumar Jul 1986 A
4612942 Dobberstein Sep 1986 A
4657638 le Grand Apr 1987 A
4892938 Giovanetto Jan 1990 A
4915969 Beyts Apr 1990 A
4917916 Hirao Apr 1990 A
5112610 Kienle May 1992 A
5576042 Fuisz Nov 1996 A
5779805 Morano Jul 1998 A
5830523 Takaichi Nov 1998 A
5962678 Payzant Oct 1999 A
5972120 Kutowy Oct 1999 A
6031157 Morita Feb 2000 A
6080561 Morita Jun 2000 A
6204377 Nishimoto Mar 2001 B1
6228996 Zhou May 2001 B1
6318157 Corso Nov 2001 B1
6706304 Ishida Mar 2004 B1
7807206 Magomet Oct 2010 B2
7838011 Abelyan Nov 2010 B2
7862845 Magomet Jan 2011 B2
8030481 Prakash Oct 2011 B2
8257948 Markosyan Sep 2012 B1
8318459 Markosyan Nov 2012 B2
8647844 Markosyan Feb 2014 B2
8669077 Markosyan Mar 2014 B2
8735101 Markosyan May 2014 B2
8911971 Markosyan Dec 2014 B2
8993269 Markosyan Mar 2015 B2
9055761 Markosyan Jun 2015 B2
9107436 Purkayastha et al. Aug 2015 B2
20021322320 Wang Sep 2002
20020187232 Lee Dec 2002 A1
20020197371 Lee Dec 2002 A1
20030161876 Hansson Aug 2003 A1
20030232118 Lerchenfeld Dec 2003 A1
20030236399 Zheng Dec 2003 A1
20060083838 Jackson Apr 2006 A1
20060134292 Abelyan Jun 2006 A1
20060142555 Jonnala Jun 2006 A1
20070082102 Magomet Apr 2007 A1
20070082103 Magomet Apr 2007 A1
20070082106 Lee Apr 2007 A1
20070116800 Prakash May 2007 A1
20070116819 Prakash May 2007 A1
20070116820 Prakash May 2007 A1
20070116821 Prakash May 2007 A1
20070116822 Prakash May 2007 A1
20070116823 Prakash May 2007 A1
20070116824 Prakash May 2007 A1
20070116825 Prakash May 2007 A1
20070116826 Prakash May 2007 A1
20070116827 Prakash May 2007 A1
20070116828 Prakash May 2007 A1
20070116829 Prakash May 2007 A1
20070116830 Prakash May 2007 A1
20070116831 Prakash May 2007 A1
20070116832 Prakash May 2007 A1
20070116833 Prakash May 2007 A1
20070116834 Prakash May 2007 A1
20070116835 Prakash May 2007 A1
20070116836 Prakash May 2007 A1
20070116837 Prakash May 2007 A1
20070116838 Prakash May 2007 A1
20070116839 Prakash May 2007 A1
20070116840 Prakash May 2007 A1
20070116841 Prakash May 2007 A1
20070128311 Prakash Jun 2007 A1
20070134390 Prakash Jun 2007 A1
20070134391 Prakash Jun 2007 A1
20070224321 Prakash Sep 2007 A1
20070292582 Prakash Dec 2007 A1
20080064063 Brandle Mar 2008 A1
20080102497 Wong May 2008 A1
20080107775 Prakash May 2008 A1
20080107776 Prakash May 2008 A1
20080107787 Prakash May 2008 A1
20080108710 Prakash May 2008 A1
20080111269 Politi May 2008 A1
20080226770 Lee Sep 2008 A1
20080226797 Lee Sep 2008 A1
20080292764 Prakash Nov 2008 A1
20080292765 Prakash Nov 2008 A1
20080292775 Prakash Nov 2008 A1
20080300402 Yang Dec 2008 A1
20090017185 Catani Jan 2009 A1
20090053378 Prakash Feb 2009 A1
20090074935 Lee Mar 2009 A1
20090079935 Harris Mar 2009 A1
20090104330 Zasypkin Apr 2009 A1
20090142817 Norman Jun 2009 A1
20090162499 McArdle Jun 2009 A1
20090226590 Fouache Sep 2009 A1
20100055752 Kumar Mar 2010 A1
20100056472 Duan Mar 2010 A1
20100099857 Evans Apr 2010 A1
20100011215 Abelyan May 2010 A1
20100057024 Cavallini May 2010 A1
20100120710 Watanabe May 2010 A1
20100013756 Prakash et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100137569 Prakash Jun 2010 A1
20100018986 Abelyan et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100166679 Abelyan Jul 2010 A1
20100189861 Abelyan Jul 2010 A1
20100227034 Purkayastha Sep 2010 A1
20100255171 Purkayastha Oct 2010 A1
20100278993 Prakash Nov 2010 A1
20100316782 Shi Dec 2010 A1
20110030457 Valery Feb 2011 A1
20110033525 Lui Feb 2011 A1
20110092684 Abelyan Apr 2011 A1
20110104353 Lee May 2011 A1
20110111115 Shi May 2011 A1
20110124587 Jackson May 2011 A1
20110163011 Prakash Jun 2011 A1
20110183056 Morita Jul 2011 A1
20110189360 Yoo Aug 2011 A1
20110195169 Markosyan Aug 2011 A1
20110224168 Szente Sep 2011 A1
20120157553 Dewis Jun 2012 A1
20120164678 Stephanopoulos Jun 2012 A1
20120214751 Markosyan Aug 2012 A1
20120214752 Markosyan Aug 2012 A1
20120301589 Markosyan Nov 2012 A1
20130030060 Markosyan Jan 2013 A1
20130064955 Miquel et al. Mar 2013 A1
20130071339 Markosyan Mar 2013 A1
20130347140 Wang Dec 2013 A1
20140017378 Purkayastha et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140227421 Markosyan Aug 2014 A1
20140271996 Prakash Sep 2014 A1
20140357588 Markosyan Dec 2014 A1
20150031868 Lehmann Jan 2015 A1
20150141632 Markosyan May 2015 A1
20150157045 Markosyan Jun 2015 A1
20150257424 Catani et al. Sep 2015 A1
20170190728 Markosyan Jul 2017 A1
20180079767 Markosyan et al. Mar 2018 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (118)
Number Date Country
1049666 Mar 1991 CN
1100727 Mar 1995 CN
1112565 Nov 1995 CN
1192447 Sep 1998 CN
1238341 May 2002 CN
1349997 May 2002 CN
101200480 Jun 2008 CN
101591365 Dec 2009 CN
101628924 Jan 2010 CN
0957178 Apr 1999 EP
2350110 Mar 2011 EP
2433505 Mar 2012 EP
2510800 Oct 2012 EP
52005800 Jan 1977 JP
52083731 Jul 1977 JP
52100500 Aug 1977 JP
52136200 Nov 1977 JP
54030199 Mar 1979 JP
54132599 Oct 1979 JP
55039731 Mar 1980 JP
55081567 Jun 1980 JP
55092400 Jul 1980 JP
55120770 Sep 1980 JP
55138372 Oct 1980 JP
55159770 Dec 1980 JP
55162953 Dec 1980 JP
56099768 Aug 1981 JP
56109568 Aug 1981 JP
56121453 Sep 1981 JP
56121454 Sep 1981 JP
56121455 Sep 1981 JP
56160962 Dec 1981 JP
57002656 Jan 1982 JP
57005663 Jan 1982 JP
57046998 Mar 1982 JP
57075992 May 1982 JP
57086264 May 1982 JP
58020170 Feb 1983 JP
58028246 Feb 1983 JP
58028247 Feb 1983 JP
58212759 Dec 1983 JP
58212760 Dec 1983 JP
59045848 Mar 1984 JP
62166861 Jul 1987 JP
63173531 Jul 1988 JP
1131191 May 1989 JP
3262458 Nov 1991 JP
6007108 Jan 1994 JP
6192283 Jul 1994 JP
7143860 Jun 1995 JP
7177862 Jul 1995 JP
8000214 Jan 1996 JP
9107913 Apr 1997 JP
2000236842 Sep 2000 JP
2000270804 Oct 2000 JP
2002262822 Sep 2002 JP
2010516764 May 2010 JP
20070067199 Jun 2007 KR
20080071605 Aug 2008 KR
20090021386 Mar 2009 KR
2111969 May 1998 RU
2123267 Dec 1998 RU
2156083 Sep 2000 RU
2167544 May 2001 RU
2198548 Feb 2003 RU
WO2002087359 Nov 2002 WO
WO2005089483 Sep 2005 WO
WO2006072878 Jul 2006 WO
WO2006072879 Jul 2006 WO
WO2007061795 May 2007 WO
WO2008091547 Jul 2008 WO
WO2008112966 Sep 2008 WO
WO2009071277 Jun 2009 WO
WO2009108680 Sep 2009 WO
WO2009140394 Nov 2009 WO
WO2010038911 Apr 2010 WO
WO2010118218 Oct 2010 WO
WO2010146463 Dec 2010 WO
WO2011046423 Apr 2011 WO
WO2011059954 May 2011 WO
WO2011097359 Aug 2011 WO
WO2011112892 Sep 2011 WO
WO2011153378 Dec 2011 WO
WO2012006728 Jan 2012 WO
WO2012082493 Jun 2012 WO
WO2012082677 Jun 2012 WO
WO2012088593 Jul 2012 WO
WO2012102769 Aug 2012 WO
WO2012112180 Aug 2012 WO
WO2012125991 Sep 2012 WO
WO2012129451 Sep 2012 WO
WO-2012129451 Sep 2012 WO
WO2012166163 Dec 2012 WO
WO2012166164 Dec 2012 WO
WO2012177727 Dec 2012 WO
WO2013022989 Feb 2013 WO
WO2014122328 Feb 2013 WO
WO2013096420 Jun 2013 WO
WO2013110673 Aug 2013 WO
WO2013176738 Nov 2013 WO
WO2014086890 Jun 2014 WO
WO2014122227 Aug 2014 WO
WO2014146089 Sep 2014 WO
WO2014146135 Sep 2014 WO
2014197898 Dec 2014 WO
WO2014193888 Dec 2014 WO
WO2014197898 Dec 2014 WO
2015023928 Feb 2015 WO
WO2015023928 Feb 2015 WO
WO2015152707 Oct 2015 WO
WO2016023103 Feb 2016 WO
WO2016034942 Mar 2016 WO
WO2016100689 Jun 2016 WO
WO2016143361 Sep 2016 WO
WO2016187559 Nov 2016 WO
WO2017031301 Feb 2017 WO
WO2017059414 Apr 2017 WO
WO2017160846 Sep 2017 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (92)
Entry
Masaya Ohta et al., “Characterization of Novel Steviol Glycosides from Leaves of Stevia rebaudiana Morita”, pp. 199-209, published 2010, The Japanese Society of Applied Glycoscience vol. 57.
A-Glucosyltransferase Treated Stevia, Japan's Specifications and Standards for Food Additives, VIII edition, 2009, p. 257.
Ahmed, et al., “Use of p-Bromophenacyl Bromide to Enhance Ultraviolet Detection of Water-Soluble Organic Acids (Steviolbioside and Rebaudioside B) in High-Performance Liquid Chromatographic Analysis”, Journal of Chromatography, vol. 192, 1980, 387-393.
Chang, S. S. et al., “Stability Studies of Stevioside and Rebaudioside A in Carbonated Beverages”, Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 31, 1983, 409-412.
Chen, et al., “Enrichment and separation of rebaudioside A from stevia glycosides by a novel adsorbent with pyridyl group”, Science in China, vol. 42, No. 3 1999 , 277-282.
Chen, et al., “Selectivity of polymer adsorbent in adsorptive separations of stevia diterpene glycisides”, Science in China, vol. 41, No. 4 1998 , 436-441.
Chen, et al., “Studies on the adsorptive selectivity of the polar resin with carbonyl group on rebaudioside A”, Acta Polymeric Scnica, No. 4 1999 , 398-403.
Crammer, et al., “Sweet glycosides from the Stevia plant”, Chemistry in Britain, Oct. 1986, 915-916, 918.
Chatsudthipong, et al. Stevioside and related compounds: Therapeutic benefits beyond sweetness, pp. 41-45 Pharmacology & Therapeutics 121 (2009).
Darise et al., “Enzymic Transglucosylation of Rubusoside and the Structure-Sweetness Relationship of Steviol Bisglycosides,” Agric. Biol. Chem. vol. 48(10), 1984, 2483-2488.
Dubois et al., “Diterpenoid Sweeteners. Synthesis and Sensory Evaluation of Stevioside Analogues with Improved Organoleptic Properties,” J. Med. Chem. vol. 28, (1985) 93-98.
Espinoza et al., “Identification, Quantification, and Sensory Characterization of Steviol Glycosides from Differently Processed Stevia rebaudiana Commercial Extracts”, Agric. Food Chem. 2014 62, 11797-11804, pp. 1-8.
FAO/WHO “Combined Compendium of Food Additive Specifications” FAO JECFA Monographs 1, vol. 4, 2006, Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations, Rome, pp. 1-204.
Fuh, “Purification of steviosides by membrane and ion exchange process”, Journal of Food Science, vol. 55, No. 5 1990, 1454-1457.
Fukunaga et al., “Enzymic Transglucosylation Products of Stevioside: Separation and Sweetness-evaluation,” Agric. Biol. Chem. vol. 53(6) (1989) 1603-1607.
Fullas et al., “Separation of natural product sweetening agents using overpressured layer chromatography,” Journal of Chromatography vol. 464 (1989) 213-219.
Hale, et al., “Amylase of Bacillus Macerans”, Cereal Chemistry, vol. 28, No. 1, Jan. 1951, 49-58.
Ibrahim et al., “Minor Diterpene Glycosides from the Leaves of Stevia Rebaudiana”, J. Nat. Prod., 2014, 77, 1231-1235.
International Search Report and Written Opinion of PCT/US2010/055960, pp. 1-11 dated Jan. 2011.
International Search Report and Written Opinion of PCT/US2011/028028, pp. 1-8 dated May 2011.
International Search Report and Written Opinion of PCT/US2011/033734, pp. 1-8 dated Jul. 2011.
International Search Report and Written Opinion of PCT/US2011/033737, pp. 1-8 dated Jul. 2011.
International Search Report and Written Opinion of PCT/US2011/033912, pp. 1-6 dated Jul. 2011.
International Search Report and Written Opinion of PCT/US2011/035173, pp. 1-7 dated Jul. 2011.
International Search Report and Written Opinion of PCT/US2011/036063, pp. 1-6 dated Aug. 2011.
International Search Report and Written Opinion of PCT/US2011/047498, pp. 1-7 dated Dec. 2011.
International Search Report and Written Opinion of PCT/US2011/047499, pp. 1-7 dated Dec. 2011.
International Search Report and Written Opinion of PCT/US2011/064343, pp. 1-17 dated Dec. 2011.
International Search Report and Written Opinion of PCT/US2012/024585, pp. 1-8 dated Jun. 2012.
International Search Report and Written Opinion of PCT/US2012/024722, pp. 1-8 dated May 2012
International Search Report and Written Opinion of PCT/US2012/030210, pp. 1-9 dated Jul. 2012.
International Search Report and Written Opinion of PCT/US2012/043294, pp. 1-7 dated Sep. 2012.
International Search Report and Written Opinion of PCT/US2012/051163, pp. 1-9 dated Oct. 2012.
International Search Report and Written Opinion of PCT/US2012/052659, pp. 1-9 dated Nov. 2012.
International Search Report and Written Opinion of PCT/US2012/052665, pp. 1-8 dated Nov. 2012.
International Search Report and Written Opinion of PCT/US2014/041548, pp. 1-8 dated Oct. 2014.
International Search Report and Written Opinion of PCT/US2014/056451, pp. 1-10 dated Feb. 2015.
International Search Report and Written Opinion of PCT/US2016/058834, pp. 1-7 dated Jan. 2017.
International Search Report and Written Opinion of PCT/US2015/047234, pp. 1-7 dated Nov. 2015.
International Search Report and Written Opinion of PCT/US2018/053258, pp. 1-9 dated Nov. 2018.
Gorden et al. (“Supersaturation” Access Science McGraw Hill 2008, p. 1, http://www.accessscience.com/content/supersaturation/670000).
Hartel, Richard “Crystallization in Foods” Handbook of Industrial Crystallization Elsevier 2002, pp. 287 and 293-296.
“Recrystallization Technique: Proper purification of crystalline solids”. Available online as of Dec. 4, 2009 from www.erowid.org. pp. 1-3.
Huang, X Y, et al. “Preparative isolation and purification of steviol glycosides from Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni using high-speed counter-current chromatogoraphy” Separation and Purification Technology Elsevier Science, Netherlands, vol. 71, No. 2, 2010, p. 220-224.
Jaitak, et al., “An Efficient Microwave-assisted Extraction Process of Stevioside and Rebaudioside—A from Stevia Rebaudiana (Bertoni)”, Phytochem. Anal. vol. 20 2009, 240-245.
Kennelly, “Sweet and non-sweet constituents of Stevia rebaudiana”, Stevia: The genus Stevia, Taylor & Francis, 2002, 68-85.
Kinghorn, “Overview”, Stevia: The genus Stevia, Taylor & Francis, 2002, 1-17.
Kitahata, S. et al., “Production of Rubusoside Derivatives by Transgalactosylation of Various b-Galactosidases” Agric. Biol. Chem., vol. 53, No. 11 1989, 2923-2928.
Kobayashi, et al., “Dulcoside A and B, New diterpene glycosides from Stevia Rebaudiana”, Phytochemistry, vol. 16 1977, 1405-1408.
Kochikyan ,et al. ,“Combined Enzymatic Modification of Stevioside and Rebaudioside A”, Applied Biochemistry and Microbiology, vol. 42, No. 1, 2006, 31-37.
Kohda, et al., “New sweet diterpene glucosides from Stevia Rebaudiana”, Phytochemistry, vol. 15 1976 , 981-983.
Kovylyaeva, et al., “Glycosides from Stevia rebaudiana”, Chemistry of Natural Compounds, vol. 43, No. 1 2007, 81-85.
Li, Sha et al.; “Transglycosylation of stevioside to improve the edulcorant quality by lower substitution using cornstarch hydrolysate and CGTase”, Food Chemistry, vol. 138, No. 2, Nov. 12, 2012, pp. 2064-2069, XP028977479, ISSN: 0308-8146, DOI: 10.1016/J.FOODCHEM.2012.10.124.
Liu, et al., “Study of stevioside preparation by membrane separation process”, Desalination, vol. 83 1991, 375-382.
Lobov, S. V. et al., “Enzymic Production of Sweet Stevioside Derivatives: Transglucosylation of Glucosidases”, Agric. Biol. Chem., vol. 55, No. 12 1991, 2959-2965.
Montovaneli, et al., “The effect of temperature and flow rate on the clarification of the aqueous Stevia-extract in fixed-bed column with zeolites”, Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering, vol. 21, No. 3 2004 , 449-458.
Moraes, et al., “Clarification of Stevia rebaudiana (Bert.) Bertoni extract adsorption in modified zeolites”, Acta Scientiarum, vol. 23, No. 6 2001, 1375-1380.
News Bites, GLG announces high purity REB M GRAS notification with FDA. Consumer Durables & Apparel Melbourne. Apr. 15, 2014. pp. 1-2. especially, p. 1, para 5; p. 2, para 1.
Ohio “14.0 Spray Drying and Spray Dryers”, pp. 1-10, http://class.fst.ohio-state-edu/Dairy_Tech/14Spraydrying.htm Nov. 2, 2009 as obtained by internetarchive.org.
Ohta et al., “Characterization of Novel Steviol Glycosides from Leaves of Stevia rebaudiana Morita,” J. Appl. Glycosi., vol. 57, 199-209, 2010.
Ohtani et al. “Chapter 7. Methods to improve the taste of the sweet principles of Stevia rebaudiana.” The Genus Stevia, edited by A. Douglas Kinghorn, CRC Press 2001, Taylor and Francis, London and New York, pp. 138-159.
Philips, K.C. “Stevia: steps in developing a new sweetener”, In T.H. Grenby, Editor, Developments in Sweeteners-3, Elsevier 1987, 1-43.
Pol, et al., “Comparison of two different solvents employed for pressurised fluid extraction of stevioside from Stevia rebaudiana: methanol versus water”, Anal Bioanal Chem vol. 388 2007 , 1847-1857.
Pol, et al., “Characterisation of Stevia Rebaudiana by comprehensive two-dimensional liquid chromatography time-of-flight mass spectrometry,” Journal of Chromatography A, 1150 (2007) 85-92.
Prakash et al., “Development of rebiana, a natural, non-caloric sweetener,” Jul. 1, 2008, Food and Chemical Toxology, vol. 46, Is. 7, Sup. 1, p. S75-S82.
Prakash et al. “Isolation and Characterization of a Novel Rebaudioside M Isomer from a Bioconversion Reaction of Rebaudioside A and NMR Comparison Studies of Rebaudioside M Isolated from Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni and Stevia rebaudiana Morita,” Biomolecules, vol. 4, 2014, 374-389, p. 385 para 5.
Prakash et al., “Development of Next Generation Stevia Sweetener: Rebaudioside M” Foods 2014, 3, 162-175, ISSN 2304-8158.
Ramirez, I.; “Glucose polymer taste is not unitary for rats”, Physiology & Behaviour, 1994, 55(2), pp. 355-360 (Abstract only).
Rebaudioside A and Stevia Extract, Internet Citation, 2007 http://emperorsherbologist.com/rebaudioside a.php. p. 1-3.
Richman et al., “Fuctional genomics uncovers three glucosyltransferases involved in the synthesis of the major sweet glucosides of Stevia rebaudiana,” The Plant Journal, vol. 41 (2005) 56-67.
Sakamoto et al., “Application of 13C NMR Spectroscopy to Chemistry of Natural Glycosides: Rebaudioside-C, a New Sweet Diterpene Glycoside of Stevia Rebaudiana”, Chem. Pharm. Bull., vol. 25, 1977, 844-846.
Shi, et al. “Synthesis of bifuntional polymeric adsorbent and its application in purification of Stevia glycosides”, Reactive & functional Polymers, vol. 50 2002, 107-116.
Shibata et al. “Glucosylation of Steviol and Steviol-Glucosides in Extracts from Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni,” Plant Physiol, vol. 95,(1991) 152-156.
Starratt, et al. “Rebaudioside F, a diterpene glycoside from Stevia Rebaudiana”, Phytochemistry, vol. 59 2002, 367-370.
Sweet Green Fields, LLC “Notice to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) that the use of Rebiana (Rebaudiosid A) derived from Stevia rebaudiana, as a Food Ingredient is Generally Recognized as Safe (GRAS),” Jan. 15, 2009, http:/www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/fcn/gras_notices/grn000282.pdf (obtained from the Web on May 8, 2012) entire document esp. p. 22, Table 1, pp. 1-97.
Tanaka, O., “Improvement of taste of natural sweeteners,” Pure & Appl. Chem., vol. 69, No. 4 1997, 675-683.
Teo, et al. “Validation of green-solvent extraction combined with Chromatographic chemical fingerprint to evaluate quality of Stevia reaudiana Bertoni”, J. Sep. Sci, vol. 32 2009, 613-622.
Toyo sugar, “GRAS Exemption Claim for a-Glucosylated Steviol Glycosides” Office of Food Additive Safety. Feb. 23, 2011, pp. 1-51.
United Nations' Food and Agriculture Organization/Joint Expert Committee on Food Additives (2010) Steviol Glycosides, Compendium ofFood Additive Specifications, FAO JECFA Monographs 10, 17-21, pp. 1-5.
UN “Steviol Glycosides” JECFA 2008 pp. 1-4, UN “Steviol Glycosides” JECFA 2008 pp. 1-4 http://www.fao.org/ag/agn/jecfa-additives/specs/monograph5/additive-442-m5.pdf.
Van der Maarel et al., “Properties and applications of starch-converting enzymes of the a-amylase family,” Journal of Biotechnology, vol. 94 (220) 137-155.
Vasquez et al., Stimulation of the Gerbil's Gustatory Receptors by Some Potently Sweet Terpenoids, J. Agric. Food Chem., vol. 41, 1305-1310, 1993.
Wallin, “Steviol glycosides,” 2004, XP002740430 ftp://ftp.fao.org/es/esn/jecfa/cta/CTA63_Steviol.pdf, pp. 1, 4, 5. Retrieved 2015.
Yamamoto, K. et al., “Effective Production of Glycosyl-steviosides by a-1, 6 Transglucosylation of Dextrin Dextranase”, Biosci. Biotech. Biochem. vol. 58, No. 9 1994, 1657-1661.
Ye, et al. “Modification of stevioside using transglucosylation activity of Bacilllus amyloliquefaciens a-amylase to reduce its bitter aftertaste,” LWT—Food Science and Technology, vol. 51, Issue 1, May 2013, pp. 524-530.
Yoshikawa, et al. “Transglycosylation of Mogroside V, a Triterpene Glycoside in Siraitia grosvenori, by Cyclodextrin Glucanotransferase and Improvement of the Qualities of Sweetness,” The Japanese Society of Applied Glycoscience, vol. 52, No. 3, 2005, p. 247-252.
Yoda, et al. “Supercritical fluid extraction from Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni using CO2 and CO2+ water: extraction kinetics and identification of extracted components”, Journal of Food Engineering, vol. 57 2003, 125-134.
Remington: The Science and Practice of Pharmacy, 21st Edition. The University of the Sciences in Philadelphia, 2006. Part 5, p. 700.
Zell, et al. “Investigation of Polymorphism in Aspartame and Neotame Using Solid-State NMR Spectroscopy”, Tetrahedron, vol. 56, 2000, 6603-6616.
“Methanol”. Available online from Sigma-Aldrich as of Jan. 4, 2016. pp. 1-2.
“Acetone”. Available online from Sigma-Aldrich as of Jan. 4, 2016. pp. 1-2.
Zhang, et al. “Membrane-based separation schemem for processing sweetener from Stevia leaves”, Food Research International, vol. 33 2000, 617-620.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20180317534 A1 Nov 2018 US
Provisional Applications (2)
Number Date Country
62255838 Nov 2015 US
62246412 Oct 2015 US