This application claims the benefit of priority from Chinese Patent Application No. 202410141583.3, filed on Jan. 31, 2024. The content of the aforementioned application, including any intervening amendments made thereto, is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
This application relates to connectors, and more particularly to a stiffening girder erection method of a ground-anchored suspension bridge.
Ground-anchored suspension bridges using space main cables have begun to emerge in recent years to improve the wind resistance of long-span suspension bridges. In existing methods for erecting stiffening girders of ground-anchored suspension bridges with space main cables, the two main cables are first pushed (or pulled) to close to or reach the transversal position of the completed bridge, and then the stiffening girders are erected, which inevitably increases the temporary facilities and processes required to push the two main cables apart or pull the two main cables closer together, resulting in an increased cost and construction period. For bridges with large transverse inclination angles of cable systems in the completed state, a plurality of temporary pushing (or pulling) facilities are commonly arranged along the longitudinal direction of the bridge. During the process of the main cable being temporarily pushed (or pulled), torques occur since the force exerted by each temporary pushing (pulling) facility on the main cable is difficult to completely pass through the cross-sectional center of the main cable, and even the direction of torques may be reversed, thus causing a large torsion of the main cable. Moreover, the torsion angles along the main cable axis are different or even reversed, causing trouble for subsequent construction.
An object of the disclosure is to provide a stiffening girder erection method of a space main cable ground-anchored suspension bridge without temporary push (or pull) movement of a main cable.
In order to achieve the above object, the following technical solutions are adopted.
This application provides a stiffening girder erection method of a ground-anchored suspension bridge, comprising:
In some embodiments, the step (4) is performed through steps of:
In some embodiments, it is assumed that two points E and F on each of the clips in the bridge complete state are located on a tangent line of a configuration of a corresponding hanger rod at an upper endpoint thereof, an angle between an EF connection line in another state and an EF connection line in the bridge complete state is configured as a lateral deflection angle of each of the clips in the another state, and the lateral pre-deflection angle of each of the clips is a lateral deflection angle achieved during installation and adjustment.
In some embodiments, the lateral inclination angle of each of the hanger rods is an angle between a tangent line of a configuration of each of the hanger rods at an upper endpoint thereof and a vertical line in a projection of each of the hanger rods on a vertical plane perpendicular to a bridge central axis in the bridge complete state.
In some embodiments, it is assumed that an angle between a top-bottom connecting line AB of a section of the main cable in a tightened state and a line AB of a section of the main cable in a certain state is an azimuth angle of the section of the main cable around the central axis thereof in the certain state; and the azimuth angle of the section of the main cable around the central axis thereof is the azimuth angle of the main cable around the central axis thereof.
In some embodiments, in step (2), the preset distance is not less than 60 times a diameter of the main cable, and a girder section which not adjacent to the two main towers is located at the preset distance.
In some embodiments, the theoretical value of the lateral deflection angle of each of the clips is calculated through simulation analysis using a modified finite element model, a modified linear or a modified nonlinear model.
In some embodiments, in step (4), the adjustment of the lateral deflection angle of each of the clips is calculated through simulation analysis using a modified finite element model, a modified linear or a modified nonlinear model.
In some embodiments, the stiffening girder is a steel box girder, a steel truss girder or a steel-concrete composite girder.
In some embodiments, a rise-to-span ratio fh/L of a plane projection of the main cable in the bridge complete state in a transverse direction is greater than 1/175.
Compared to the prior art, this application has the following beneficial effects.
In the stiffening girder erection method of the present disclosure, there is no need to push (pull) the main cable before installing the stiffening girder, which eliminates a required process and device or facility for pushing (pulling) the main cable, thus saving the cost and construction period. Moreover, an additional torsion caused by the temporary push (or pull) of the main cable can be avoided. During the installation of the stiffening girder, the prediction model is modified based on an actual measurement of the change in the azimuth angle of the main cable around the central axis, so as to determine the adjustment amount of the lateral deflection angle of the clip, thereby reducing a deviation between the lateral inclination angle and a designed lateral inclination angle of the clip in the bridge complete state, resulting in favorable stress on the main cable, the clip and the hanger rod. In addition, the problem that when tower side girder sections are installed first, the large pre-deflection angle of the clip of these girder sections results in unfavorable stress on the main cable, the clip and the hanger rod can be avoided, which is caused by a large deviation between a predicted (calculated) value and an actual value of the azimuth angle change of the main cable around the central axis thereof at a clip within a certain distance along the longitudinal direction of the two main towers and at a first clip in an early installation stage of the stiffening girder. At the same time, this facilitates the avoidance of the problem of a large gap between a corresponding hanger rod installation state and the bridge complete state when first installing girder sections close to the mid-span, which leads to difficulty or inability to meet construction requirements.
In order to illustrate the technical solutions in the embodiments of the present disclosure or in the prior art more clearly, the drawings needed in the description of embodiments or the prior art will be briefly introduced below. Obviously, for those of ordinary skill in the art, other drawings can be obtained based on these drawings without exerting creative efforts.
The realization of the purpose, functional features and advantages of the present disclosure will be further described with reference to the embodiments and the accompanying drawings.
The technical solutions of the present disclosure will be clearly and completely described below in conjunction with the accompanying drawings and embodiments. Obviously, described below are only some embodiments of the present disclosure, instead of all embodiments of the present disclosure. Based on the embodiments in the present disclosure, all other embodiments obtained by those of ordinary skill in the art without making creative efforts shall fall within the scope of the present disclosure.
It should be noted that all directional indications (such as up, down, left, right, front, back . . . ) in the description of the embodiments are merely intended to explain a relative positional relationship, movement, etc. between components in a specific posture (as shown in the accompanying drawings). When the specific posture changes, the directional indication changes accordingly.
In addition, descriptions involving “first”, “second”, etc. in this application are only descriptive, and cannot be understood as indicating or implying relative importance or implicitly indicating the number of indicated technical features. Therefore, features defined as “first” and “second” can explicitly or implicitly include at least one of the features. In addition, “and/or” in the entire specification includes three solutions. For example, A and/or B includes technical solution A, technical solution B, and technical solutions that satisfy both A and B. Moreover, technical solutions in the embodiments can be combined with each other, but must be based on what can be achieved by those of ordinary skill in the art. When the combination of technical solutions appears to be contradictory or cannot be realized, it should be deemed that such combination of technical solutions does not exist and is not within the scope of the present disclosure defined by the appended claims.
A space main cable suspension bridge of the present disclosure refers to a suspension bridge in which a rise-to-span ratio fh/L in a transverse direction in a plane projection of a main cable in a bridge complete state is greater than 1/175. When the rise-to-span ratio fh/L is 0, the space main cable suspension bridge degenerates into a planar main cable suspension bridge.
As shown in
(S1) Clips for all hanger rods of a space main cable suspension bridge are installed such that design center lines of the clips are coincident with center lines of the hanger rods, respectively. The design center lines of the clips are located in a vertical plane, such that a lateral pre-deflection angle of each of the clips is configured as a lateral inclination angle of a corresponding one of the hanger rods in a bridge complete state.
(S2) A first stiffening girder section is installed at a position away from a first tower at a preset distance along a longitudinal direction. A second stiffening girder section is installed at a position away from a second tower at the preset distance along the longitudinal direction. A plurality of third stiffening girder sections are installed one by one in a direction respectively from the first stiffening girder and the second stiffening girder toward a mid-span until a mid-span closure is completed. An azimuth angle of a main cable around a central axis thereof at each of the clips is measured after one or more of the plurality of third stiffening girder sections are installed. A lateral deflection angle of each of the clips is calculated as a lateral inclination angle of each of the plurality of the hanger rods minus the azimuth angle of the main cable around the central axis thereof at each of the clips.
(S3) A plurality of fourth stiffening girder sections are installed one by one respectively from the first stiffening girder section toward the first tower and from the second stiffening girder section toward the second tower until a stiffening girder is closed at mid-span.
(S4) An azimuth angle of the central axis of the main cable at each of the clips is measured.
In the stiffening girder erection method of the present disclosure, there is no need to push (pull) the main cable away before installing the stiffening girder, which eliminates the process of pushing (pulling) the main cable apart, thereby avoiding additional torsion of the main cable caused by the main cable being pushed (pulled) apart, thus reducing a deviation between a torsion angle and a preset optimal torsion angle of the main cable. In addition, when installing the stiffening girder, the azimuth angle of the main cable around the central axis thereof at the hanger rod of the upcoming installed stiffening girder section is first measured, which is the lateral deflection angle of the clip, and then the measured value of the lateral deflection angle of the clip is compared with the theoretical value to determine the adjustment amount of the lateral deflection angle of the clip. After adjustment, the stiffening girder is installed. The azimuth angle of the main cable around the central axis thereof is continuously adjusted during the installation of the stiffening girder to make it closer to the theoretical value, thereby further reducing the deviation between the torsion angle and the preset optimal torsion angle of the main cable.
In this embodiment, the process of pushing (pulling) the main cable apart in advance is omitted, thereby improving efficiency. In addition, a temporary facility required to push (pull) the main cable laterally can be eliminated, which facilitates fewer required facilities and lower cost.
The step (4) is performed through the following steps.
An azimuth angle of the central axis of the main cable at a hanger rod among the hanger rods corresponding to an uninstalled fourth stiffening girder section among the plurality of fourth stiffening girder sections is measured. A measured value and a theoretical value of a change of an azimuth angle of the central axis of the main cable at a certain stage are compared. A prediction model of an azimuth angle change value of the central axis of the main cable at the hanger rod corresponding to the uninstalled fourth stiffening girder section is modified. An adjustment of a lateral deflection angle of a clip of the hanger rod corresponding to the uninstalled fourth stiffening girder section is determined and adjusted. An uninstalled fourth stiffening girder section is installed.
Specifically, the installation of the stiffening girder sections has the same operation. During the installation of the stiffening girder section, the azimuth angle of the main cable around the central axis thereof is continuously adjusted to make it closer to the theoretical value, thereby further reducing the deviation between the torsion angle and the preset optimal torsion angle of the main cable.
As shown in
As shown in
Specifically, a configuration of a hanger rod is a catenary line, which can generally be regarded as a straight line.
As shown in
For the space main cable suspension bridge, the empty cable is in a vertical plane under its own weight. Under an external force with horizontal and vertical components (provided by the hanger rods, a temporary cross brace, a temporary cable, etc., which are commonly difficult to completely pass through the center of the section of the tightened main cable), not only the main cable is displaced, but also each section of the main cable may be twisted. Obviously, the azimuth angle of each section of the empty cable in the vertical plane around the central axis of the main cable is 0.
In some embodiments, in step (S2), the preset distance is not less than 60 times a diameter of the main cable.
Specifically, this method uses component forces of the hanger rod generated by the weight of the stiffening girder to gradually pull the main cable apart or close, gradually forming a spatial shape of the bridge. In this way, the shortcomings of increased temporary facilities and corresponding processes for the main cable being pushed (pulled) apart laterally caused by pushing (pulling) the main cable apart first and then installing the stiffening girder can be overcome. A risk of twisting the main cable section due to an axial force not passing through the center of the main cable section in a transverse push (pull) state can be avoided. Compared to a traditional solution of first erecting the girder section at the mid-span, a maximum lifting height of the stiffening girder is reduced, leading to a reduced capacity requirement of a lifting device. Compared to a traditional solution of first erecting the girder section at the mid-span or near the mid-span (that is, not erecting the girder section near the two main towers first), this application is easier to meet a structural compatibility condition, due to a shorter distance between an upper end position of the hanger rod and a complete position when each girder section is installed, and fewer structural restrictions on a location of an anchor point of the hanger rod and a diameter of a casing of the hanger rod.
In some embodiments, the theoretical value of the lateral deflection angle of each of the clips is calculated through finite element simulation analysis. Specifically, the finite element simulation analysis is performed using an ANSYS software.
In some embodiments, in step (S4), the adjustment of the lateral deflection angle of each of the clips is calculated through finite element simulation analysis. Specifically, the finite element simulation analysis is performed using an ANSYS software.
Specifically, a finite element stiffness of a clip is calculated based on the measured value of the lateral deflection angle of the clip and the theoretical value, and the adjustment amount of the lateral deflection angle of the clip is calculated based on the finite element stiffness.
In some embodiments, the stiffening girder is a steel box girder, a steel truss girder or a steel-concrete composite girder.
An overall process of the stiffening girder installation is shown in
The analysis object is the space main cable suspension bridge of a certain passageway, Lingding Channel, as shown in
The stiffening girder is designed as two steel box sub-girders connected by a crossbeam, as shown in
Each of the two main towers has an elevation of a top of a cap platform (i.e. a bottom of a tower column) of −7.8833 m, an elevation of a top of the tower column of 265.5461 m, and a total height of the tower column of 273.4294 m. Based on the design experience of similar projects, a 5 m-section of the tower column near the cap platform within an elevation range of −7.8833 m to −2.8833 m is set as a round-end solid section, a 89.3354 m-section within an elevation range of −2.8833 m to 86.4521 m is set as a round-end hollow section with a wall thickness of 2.2 m, a 80 m-section within an elevation range of 86.4521 m to 166.4521 m is set as a round-end hollow section with a wall thickness of 1.6 m, a 80 m-section within an elevation range of 166.4521 m to 257.5461 m is set as a round-end hollow section with a wall thickness of 1.2 m, and a 8 m-section within an elevation range of 257.5461 m to 265.5461 m is set as a round-end solid section.
According to an overall dimension of the stiffening girder (with a height of 5 m and a width of 23.7 m, as shown in
Based on the experience of similar projects, a plurality of diaphragms are provided with a spacing of 3 m. A thickness of a diaphragm at a non-hanger rod area is 10 mm. A thickness of a diaphragm at the hanger rod position is 12 mm. The number of the plurality of diaphragms of each steel box girder is 8 (7 diaphragms with a thickness of 10 mm and 1 diaphragm with a thickness of 12 mm). A peripheral stiffening plate is provided on the diaphragm close to the top plate, bottom plate and web. A vertical plate stiffening rib is provided vertically in the peripheral stiffening plate, which has a spacing of 1200 mm in the transverse direction. A horizontal plate stiffening rib is provided between longer vertical plate stiffening ribs. 2 cable holes and 1 manhole are provided on each diaphragm. A layout of the stiffening rib, cable hole and manhole of the diaphragm is shown in
It is calculated that a total mass of diaphragms of each steel box girder (single width) is 48879.53 kg. According to similar projects, a structural mass of a cable anchor of each steel box girder is 3000 kg. Therefore, a total mass of a single steel box girder per segment (excluding welds) is 260243.8649 kg, and a total mass of a single steel box girder per segment (including welds) is 264147.523 kg. Based on a cross-sectional area of the peripheral stiffening plate of the steel box girder, an equivalent density of each section of the single steel box girder (including welds) is calculated as 9951.597843 kg/m3.
The crossbeam is provided on the main girder with a gap of 12 m. The crossbeam has a height of 5 m (as shown in
After calculation, the cross-sectional characteristics of the crossbeam are obtained, as shown in Table 4.
According to statistics, a total mass of each crossbeam at the main span is 91852.324 kg. Based on the finite element simulation, the crossbeam has a length of 39.5021 m and a cross-sectional area of 0.41888 m2. A volume of the crossbeam is 16.54665523 m3, and thus a density of the crossbeam is 5551.111229 kg/m3.
A single main girder has a bridge deck pavement width of 18.75 m, a thickness of 0.075 m, a bulk density of 25000 N/m3 and a load concentration caused by the pavement of 35156.25 N/m. A total mass of a railing, a curb, an inspection vehicle track, a water pipe, etc. is initially planned to be 1300 kg per meter, corresponding to the resulting load concentration of 12747.8 N/m. Therefore, a total load concentration of the second phase dead load is 47904.05 N/m.
Based on the span, hanger rod layout, cross-sectional characteristics of the main girder and crossbeam, the equivalent bulk density and the second phase dead load in the previous two sections (sections 1.1.1 and 1.1.2), the ANSYS software is used to establish a finite element model of a rigid support continuous girder spatial rod system, which only include the main girder and imposed vertical constraints on a girder end, a tower-girder junction and a suspension point of the hanger rod. After calculation, the vertical component force at the lower end of each hanger rod (one side) is shown in Table 5. A distribution of the vertical component force of the hanger rod is shown in
According to main control geometric parameters of the main cable proposed in section 1.1.1, it is easy to determine a theoretical vertex mileage and an elevation of a main cable saddle and a loose cable saddle at a side pier, coordinates of an anchor point of the main cable (the theoretical vertex of the loose cable saddle is temporarily taken as the anchor point and the elevation of the main cable), a material and a cross-sectional size of the main cable, a material and a cross-sectional characteristics of the hanger rod, and the obtained vertical component force of the hanger rod. Referring to a quality of a clip of similar bridges, a numerical analysis calculation software of the space main cable suspension bridge cable system is used to perform iterative calculations, and the configuration and an internal force state of the cable system in the bridge complete state are obtained. The obtained node coordinates of the main cable, unstressed length of the main cable section (without considering the saddle arc correction), cable force of the cable segment and safety factor obtained according to an ultimate strength of 1860 MPa are shown in Table 6. It can be seen from Table 6 that the safety factor of the main cable in the dead-load state has a minimum value of 2.45 and a maximum value of 2.68, which will be reduced after considering a live load effect. It is calculated that an increment of a tension in the main cable section caused by a live load of a vehicle is approximately 10% of the dead load. Therefore, after considering the live load of the vehicle, the minimum safety factor of the main cable can reach 2.22. When using parallel steel wires with an ultimate strength of 1990 MPa, the minimum safety factor can reach 2.37.
According to the designed suspension point coordinates of the main girder, the vertical component force of the hanger rod in the bridge complete state determined in Table 5, the coordinates of the upper end of the hanger rod and the material and cross-sectional size of the hanger rod are determined in Table 6 (the coordinates of the main cable), a component force in the transverse direction and a vertical component force at the lower end, the force, the safety factor and the unstressed length of the hanger rod in the bridge complete state can be calculated by the numerical analysis method, as shown in Table 7 (unstressed length is not shown).
The main girder and main tower are divided into a beam element, the main cable is divided into a cable element (the unstressed length of each cable section is known), and the hanger rod is configured as the cable element (the unstressed length of the hanger rod is known). A geometric nonlinear finite element model of the full bridge that considers large displacement and stress stiffening effects is established using node positions in the bridge complete state, the corresponding cross-sectional characteristics of the elements, the dead load, and the second-stage dead load (the ANSYS model of full bridge is shown in
On the basis of the finite element model of the bridge complete state, (after considering the geometric nonlinear analysis of large displacement and stress stiffening), the main girder, hanger rod (and the second-stage dead load thereon), and the clip load on the main cable are removed. A saddle top of the main cable is pushed to the top of the main tower, such that an offset is basically 0, so as to obtain the empty cable state and the pre-offset of the main cable saddle. The obtained pre-offset of the empty cable saddle is 220 cm. Compared with the completed bridge, the empty cable has a displacement in the mid-span along the transverse direction of 24.235 m and a mid-span lift of 15.727 m.
1.2 Comparison of Stiffening Girder Erection Technical Solution without Temporary Pushing (Pulling) of the Main Cable
1.2.1 Technical Solution for First Installing Girder Section at the Mid-Span without Temporary Pushing (Pulling) of the Main Cable
When the cable is empty, a distance between two main cables in the transverse direction of the main span is 10 m, that is, a distance between the two main cables in the transverse direction is only 5 m from the center line in the longitudinal direction. A designed unstressed length of the hanger rod in the girder section at the main span is only 3.8466 m. A distance between the hanger rod on both sides of the stiffening girder in the transverse direction is 60.21 m. When the girder section at the mid-span is installed first, and no measures are taken to temporarily push (pull) the main cable laterally, even if the girder section at the mid-span is lifted until its top surface is flush with the bottom of the main cable, and a distance between the anchor point of the lower end of the hanger rod (on the girder section) on one side of the girder section at the mid-span and the anchor point of the upper end of the hanger rod (on the main cable) is the unstressed length of the hanger rod, it is impossible to make the distance between the anchor point of the lower end of the hanger rod (on the girder section) on the other side of the girder section at the mid-span and the anchor point of the upper end of the hanger rod (on the main cable) less than or equal to the unstressed length of the hanger rod. Therefore, the technical solution for first installing girder section at mid-span without temporary pushing (pulling) of the main cable is not valid.
1.2.2 Technical Solution for Installing the Stiffening Girder Section by Section from the Main Tower to the Mid-Span without Temporary Pushing (Pulling) of the Main Cable
A finite element simulation calculation is performed on an entire process of hoisting the main girder from the main tower to both sides without cross braces for the main cable at the main span (that is, without using temporary cross braces to prop up the main cable first). A vertical displacement of the main cable in the main span, a deflection of a tower top and a stress of a tower root are shown in Table 8 and
81.7
81.2
80.8
80.3
79.8
79.4
79.4
79.9
80.3
80.8
81.3
81.7
78.9
78.4
77.9
77.4
76.9
76.4
75.8
75.9
76.4
76.9
77.4
77.9
78.4
78.9
75.3
74.7
74.1
73.4
72.7
72.7
73.4
74.1
74.7
75.3
72.0
71.2
70.3
69.5
68.6
67.6
66.6
65.7
64.8
64.8
65.7
66.6
67.6
68.6
69.5
70.4
71.2
72.0
64.1
63.6
63.5
64.4
66.2
69.2
73.1
69.2
66.2
64.4
63.5
63.6
64.1
It can be seen from the structure of the steel box girder (as shown in
It can be seen from Table 9 that when the stiffening girder is installed section by section from the main tower to both sides without temporary pushing or pulling of the main cable, the entire process satisfies the structural compatibility condition and the installation condition of the main cable without temporary pushing or pulling, resulting in a generally established technical solution. However, when the main cable is transformed from a vertical plane state of the empty cable to the empty cable state of the bridge, the torsion of the main cable is constrained by the cable saddle to a certain extent, where the constraint is difficult to simulate accurately. Therefore, during the installation process of the above stiffening girder, it is necessary to reasonably determine the lateral pre-deflection angle of the clip (or the azimuth angle of the installation axis) to minimize the additional stress on the steel wire caused by torsion. Therefore, it is necessary to investigate the torsional characteristics of the main cable.
The test results of the torsion characteristics of the main cable are obtained through a 1:15 main cable torsion indoor model test. After analyzing the experimental results and arguments of this application, main conclusions can be summarized as follows.
(1) When a final value of the hanger rod force is constant, an installation pre-deflection angle of a certain clip is changed, such that the torsion angle of the main cable changes the most at said clip, and is almost unchanged at an adjacent clip and beyond. A torsion angle between the clip and the adjacent clip changes almost linearly with a distance from the clip.
(2) The torsion angle of the main cable at the clip is close to a final value under the hanger rod force at a first level, with a small later change. A torsion direction of the section of the main cable adjacent to the clip under hanger rod forces at all levels is the same, which increases as the hanger rod force increases, and a rate of increase gradually decreases.
(3) Due to complex influencing factors and mechanisms of the restraint of the cable saddle on the torsion of the main cable strands, there is no rule to follow in the magnitude and even direction of the torsion angle of the main cable near the cable saddle (a range along a span direction does not exceed 80 times or less of the diameter of the main cable, with 60 times in this application).
1.4 Technical Solution of this Application
Through the above investigation and analysis, the stiffening girder erection method is performed as follows.
Step (1) Each hanger rod and clip are installed. The design center line of the clip (coincident with the center line of the hanger rod) is allowed to be located in the vertical plane. The lateral pre-deflection angle of the clip is the lateral inclination angle of the hanger rod in the bridge complete state (the design corresponds to the lateral inclination angle of the hanger rod).
Step (2) The stiffening girder is installed section by section from a certain distance in the longitudinal direction of the two main towers (not less than 60 times the diameter of the main cable, and not a girder section adjacent to the two main towers). The stiffening girder sections are installed one by one in the direction toward the mid-span. Each time one or several girder sections are installed, the azimuth angle of the main cable around the central axis thereof at the clip (especially at the clip near the bridge tower) until the installed stiffening girders are closed at the mid-span.
Step (3) The azimuth angle of the main cable around the central axis thereof at the hanger rod corresponding to the uninstalled girder section near the two main towers (i.e., the lateral deflection angle of the clip) is measured. The theoretical value and the measured value of the lateral deflection angle are compared to determine the adjustment amount of the lateral deflection angle of the clip of the immediately adjacent uninstalled girder section (the installed girder section in the mid-span). The lateral deflection angle of the clip of the immediately uninstalled girder section is adjusted. The stiffening girder installation is performed on the adjacent girder section.
Step (4) The step (3) is repeated until the stiffening girder erection is completed.
The embodiments described above are merely illustrative of the present disclosure, and are not intended to limit the patent scope of the present in disclosure. Any equivalent structural transformation or direct/indirect application in other related technical fields made using the description and drawings of the present disclosure without departing from the concept of the disclosure shall fall within the scope of the disclosure defined by the appended claims.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
202410141583.3 | Jan 2024 | CN | national |