The present invention generally relates to the field of electromechanical switches employing shape memory alloys (SMA), and more particularly to an SMA switch having a calculated input stimulus current for the SMA for a given response time.
Electromechanical switches are a globally established, mature design type used in every level of the electronics industry, ranging from power supplies to large high power circuit breakers and isolation circuitry. Electromechanical switches are utilized in environments ranging from relatively benign (e.g., office computers) to severe (e.g., automotive power relays).
Many electromechanical switches include solenoids and/or electric motors, which perform the physical work of bringing contacts together and creating or breaking an electrical connection. Due to the maturity of this technology, there is a limited opportunity for cost, size and weight reduction, which are three critical characteristics of a switch (relay) design.
The present invention is directed to a process for calculating an input stimulus current to a shape memory alloy (SMA)-based electromechanical switch. The input stimulus current is selected to produce a heating response for a given response time. For a desired response time, an input stimulus current is calculated that meets the timing requirement and does not deleteriously affect the structure of the SMA. As the stimulus current is applied to the SMA, a fast heating response in the SMA may cause a change in the shape of the alloy and moves the contacts of the switch, making or breaking an electrical connection. In this manner, the SMA-based switch can provide improvements to switch design that meet or exceed existing switch technology in terms of responsiveness, repeatability and reliability.
It is to be understood that both the foregoing general description and the following detailed description are exemplary and explanatory only and are not necessarily restrictive of the invention as claimed. The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated in and constitute a part of the specification, illustrate an embodiment of the invention and together with the general description, serve to explain the principles of the invention.
The numerous advantages of the present invention may be better understood by those skilled in the art by reference to the accompanying figures in which:
Reference will now be made in detail to the presently preferred embodiments of the invention, examples of which are illustrated in the accompanying drawings.
In order to improve on existing technology, Shape Memory Alloy (SMA)-based electromechanical switches may be employed to provide a switch with improved responsiveness, repeatability and reliability. A mechanical response generated by heating an SMA with an electrical current may be used to bring contacts together, thereby making or breaking an electrical connection. SMA-based switches may have distinct advantages over solenoids and motors. By replacing solenoids and motors with SMA-based switches, critical design characteristics may be improved, such as decreasing cost, size and weight requirements.
Prior art switch designs utilizing SMA-based technologies have failed to meet some industrial requirements (e.g., fast response time, high reliability) for some SMA-based switches. Prior to the present invention, the response times of SMA materials have typically been slow (e.g., between 500 and 1,000 milliseconds typical response time). Further, SMA materials in a wire filament implementation often fail when exposed to high temperatures. It is not uncommon for an SMA wire to vaporize if a high electrical current is applied for too long of a duration.
The electromechanical switch of the present invention may create a controlled electrical stimulus current that may actuate an SMA-based electromechanical switch quickly, while still preserving the integrity of the SMA-based switch. Further, with a wire filament embodiment of an SMA-based switch design, there is a broader opportunity for applying SMA's to high performance electromechanical switch implementations.
Referring now to
The input stimulus current 114 is calculated for a given response time to meet the timing requirements. The calculated input stimulus current 114 produces a fast heating response in the SMA 112 and does not deleteriously affect its structure. In a specific embodiment, the SMA-based switch is capable of achieving: 1) actuation times of 5 milliseconds; 2) known repeatability of actuation in excess of 3 million of cycles or more; and 3) higher reliability of SMA-based switch (relay) design with use of a controlled and known electrical input.
The amount of energy over time flowing through the input stimulus current 114 into the SMA 112 contributes to the SMA's fast heating response. The wave shape of the stimulus current is not a factor to the response time in the SMA 112. It is contemplated that the wave shape of the input stimulus current 114 may be square, saw tooth, sine, pulse-width modulation (PWM), as well as other various shapes. The timing requirement may be satisfied so long as the energy over time provided by the input stimulus current 114 satisfies the calculated value for the given response time, regardless of the wave shape of the current.
It is further contemplated that the input stimulus current 114 may be increased or decreased in order to satisfy different response time requirements. Such changes may be accomplished without changing the overall SMA-based switch 100 design. For example, in one specific embodiment, for a given response time requirement of 6 milliseconds, an input stimulus current value may be calculated to meet the requirement. If the response time requirement is later decreased to 5 milliseconds, a stronger input stimulus current value may be calculated, which satisfies the new requirement without changing other parts of the switch. Alternatively, if the response time requirement was later extended to 7 milliseconds, a reduced input stimulus current value may be calculated to satisfy the extended response requirement, with less energy consumption while still meeting the timing requirement.
It is contemplated that SMA 112 and input stimulus current 114 may reside within a circuit loop that is isolated from a conductive path being connected/disconnected. In an alternative embodiment of the invention, SMA 112, input stimulus current 114 and the conductive path may be unisolated.
In another embodiment, shown in
It is contemplated, as shown in
It is also contemplated that the first conductive floating end 110 and the second conductive floating end 204 may establish a connection under various conditions. For example, in an exemplary embodiment, the connection is made if and only if both the first conductive floating end 110 and the second conductive floating end 204 are moved toward the center of the path 116. Therefore the electrical connection can be established only when both the first conductive portion 102 and the second conductive portion 104 initiate the connection. In another exemplary embodiment the connection can be established if any one of the first conductive floating end 110 and the second conductive floating end 204 is moved toward its counterpart. Therefore the electrical connection can be established by either one of the first conductive portion 102 or the second conductive portion 104. It is understood that alternative designs may be employed without departing from the scope and spirit of the present invention.
It is further contemplated that the second SMA 206 and the second input stimulus current 208 in the second conductive portion 104 may operate independently from their counterparts in the first conductive portion 102. For example, the input stimulus current 114 may have a first value to satisfy a given response time, while the second input stimulus current 208 may have a different value in order to satisfy a different response time. This allows independent control by both ends of the switch, with possibly different response time requirements.
In the present invention, the input stimulus current 114 is calculated for a given response time requirement. An equation derived from the First Law of Thermodynamics is used to describe the thermodynamic characteristics of SMA in general, and is shown as follows:
In this equation, a first constant C1 and a second constant C2 represent two constants in the SMA-based switch 100 design. An experimental input stimulus current I represents an input stimulus current provided to the SMA 112 which will be used to calculate the desired input stimulus current 114. A state changing temperature TON is a temperature at which the SMA 112 changes state (e.g. length and/or shape). An ambient operating temperature TAMB is an ambient operating temperature of the SMA-based switch 100. An experimental actuation time (response time) t is the amount of time takes for the SMA 112 to respond to a given experimental input stimulus current.
In step 306 a first actuation time t1 in response to a first input stimulus current I1 is determined. The first actuation time can be measured, for example, by measuring the amount of time needed for the SMA 112 to respond to the first input stimulus current. In step 308 a second actuation time t2 in response to a second input stimulus current I2, which is different from the first input stimulus current I1, is determined.
In step 310, the first constant and the second constant are determined by solving a system of two equations with two unknowns. The equations are obtained by plug-in values of the variables determined in the above steps into the equation. For instance, the state changing temperature TON and the ambient operating temperature TAMB have already been determined and they stay unchanged in the first equation and the second equation. In the first equation, the first actuation time t1 is used in place of the experimental actuation time, while the first input stimulus current I1 is used in place of the experimental input stimulus current. In the second equation the second actuation time t2 is used in place of the experimental actuation time, while the second input stimulus current I2 is used in place of the experimental input stimulus current. Therefore the value of the first constant C1 and the second constant C2 can be determined by solving the system of two equations.
In step 312, the desired input stimulus current 114 is calculated by solving one equation with one unknown (the input stimulus current 114). The equation is obtained by substituting values for the variables as determined in the above steps into the equation. For instance, the state changing temperature TON has been determined in step 302. The ambient operating temperature TAMB has been determined in step 304. The first constant C1 and the second constant C2 have been determined in step 310. The desired actuation time (a given response time requirement) is known and is used in place of the experimental actuation time t. For example if the given response time requirement is 6 milliseconds, the value of the experimental actuation time t is set to 6 milliseconds. Therefore the value of the desired input stimulus current 114 can be determined by solving the resulting equation. This equation may be solved repeatedly for different desired actuation times to provide input currents which satisfy these actuation times.
It is believed that the present invention and many of its attendant advantages will be understood by the foregoing description, and it will be apparent that various changes may be made in the form, construction and arrangement of the components thereof without departing from the scope and spirit of the invention or without sacrificing all of its material advantages. The form herein before described being merely an explanatory embodiment thereof, it is the intention of the following claims to encompass and include such changes.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1741601 | Appelberg | Dec 1929 | A |
2317523 | Delano | Apr 1943 | A |
3210643 | Else et al. | Oct 1965 | A |
3634803 | Willson et al. | Jan 1972 | A |
3725835 | Hopkins et al. | Apr 1973 | A |
3968380 | Jost et al. | Jul 1976 | A |
4007404 | Jost et al. | Feb 1977 | A |
4423401 | Mueller | Dec 1983 | A |
4544988 | Hochstein | Oct 1985 | A |
4551975 | Yamamoto et al. | Nov 1985 | A |
4700541 | Gabriel et al. | Oct 1987 | A |
4734047 | Krumme | Mar 1988 | A |
4887430 | Kroll et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
5061914 | Busch et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5410290 | Cho | Apr 1995 | A |
5570262 | Doerwald | Oct 1996 | A |
5619177 | Johnson et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5629662 | Floyd et al. | May 1997 | A |
5684448 | Jacobsen et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5825275 | Wuttig et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5870007 | Carr et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
6016096 | Barnes et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6049267 | Barnes et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6078243 | Barnes et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6133816 | Barnes et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6236300 | Minners | May 2001 | B1 |
6239686 | Eder et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6247678 | Hines et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6407478 | Wood et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6494225 | Olewicz et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6516146 | Kosaka | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6708491 | Weaver et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6762669 | Alacqua et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6917276 | Menard et al. | Jul 2005 | B1 |
6972659 | von Behrens et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6981374 | von Behrens et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7036312 | Menard et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7256518 | Gummin et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7372355 | Agronin et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7548145 | Rubel | Jun 2009 | B2 |
20010010488 | Minners | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20020021053 | Wood et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020050881 | Hyman et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20040211178 | Menard et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20050001367 | Taya et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050115235 | Mernoe | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050146404 | Yeatman | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050184533 | Hebenstreit et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20060162331 | Kirkpatirck et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20080125974 | Dubinsky et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
01262372 | Oct 1989 | JP |
01262373 | Oct 1989 | JP |
WO 03095798 | Nov 2003 | WO |
Entry |
---|
U.S. Appl. No. 11/963,741, filed Dec. 21, 2007, Cripe et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/963,738, filed Dec. 21, 2007, Cripe et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/499,104, filed Aug. 4, 2006, Woychik et al. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2008/073330, dated Mar. 6, 2009, 8 pages. |
Loh, C S. et al., “Natural Heat-Sinking Control Method for High-Speed Actuation of the SMA,” Int'l Journal of Advanced Robotic Systems, vol. 3, No. 4: 2006, pp. 303-312. |
Response to Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 11/499,104, filed with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office on Jan. 8, 2010, 13 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/499,104, mail date Oct. 8, 2009, 10 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/499,104, mail date Mar. 25, 2010, 10 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/499,104, mail date Aug. 4, 2010, 10 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/963,738, mail date Oct. 26, 2010, 6 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/963,741, mail date Oct. 26, 2010, 6 pages. |