This invention relates to the field of building materials. More particularly, this invention relates to manufactured stone building systems.
Conventional bricks, also called compressed earth blocks (CEBs), in use today are typically ceramic blocks made of kiln-fired materials, such as clay. On a small scale, clay bricks are formed in a mold, which is called the soft mud method, and on a large, commercial scale, clay bricks are made by extruding clay through a die and wire-cutting the bricks, which is called the stiff mud process. Sometimes the clay is mixed with water and these dampened clay bricks are subjected to high pressures. Such bricks are highly resistant to weathering and therefore well-suited for construction of exterior walls. The shaped clay is dried and fired to achieve the final brick shape with the desired strength. The firing process is usually done by a continuously fired kiln, in which the bricks move slowly through the firing on a conveyor belt or the like. This enables production of an essentially indefinite number of bricks which exhibit consistent physical characteristics.
Other types of building materials are sometimes used for wall construction, including wood, vinyl, stucco, and/or stones. For many years stones or natural rocks were thought by many in the building trade to be superior to bricks both functionally and aesthetically. However, stones for use in wall construction are typically heavier than bricks and must normally be sculpted into the proper shape. Some prefer stone walls because the stones are shaped and colored more naturally and randomly, and provide less of an “assembly-line” look, and more aesthetically pleasing look. However, using such irregular shapes in construction of a wall introduces difficulties in addition to regular building considerations. For example, irregular shapes may require individual stones to be broken/sculpted in order to finish the corner or side of a wall or to fit with other stones in the construction of a wall. However, this is very difficult, time-consuming, and wasteful because stones and rocks tend to break and crack irregularly. For this and other reasons, the commercial success of “natural” stone walls remains limited, despite their aesthetic, functional, and other advantages.
Attempts have been made to produce manufactured stone walls which do not require the use of sculpted or reshaped stones. Such attempts have included cast stone “tiles” which are cast from aggregate and/or ground stone and are plastered to the sides of a building to provide the illusion of natural stone walls. However, such stone tiles are not easily used in conjunction with conventional bricks.
A recent trend in home building involves the use of varying external materials to build a single wall, such as areas of brick and areas of wood paneling, all on one wall surface. However, until recently, there was no known method of effectively combining bricks and stones in the production of a wall. The regularity of bricks and the irregularity of stones makes it very difficult to integrate the two into a single wall structure, even with the use of the aforementioned manufactured stone tiles. Unlike stone tiles, conventional bricks are laid on top of each other a certain distance from the side of a building to create a wall. The space between bricks and the side of a building has the advantage of acting as an insulating space. Such a space is not possible with stone tiles, which are plastered to the side of a building. Additionally, the stone tiles may not be easily used in conjunction with bricks in building a structure, since the distance the stone tiles extend from a structure is much less than the distance bricks extend from a structure, creating aesthetic and structural problems.
Some of the problems faced with manufactured stone tiles are addressed in Applicants' U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2008/0110116, which is incorporated herein by reference. The '116 publication describes a system of manufactured stone blocks which have at least one surface with a simulated-stone appearance and having a length, a height, and a depth determined based on a compatibility factor derived from the length, height, and depth of a conventional brick and the width of the mortar joint located between conventional bricks. The compatibility factor is used to derive a dimension equation for the length, height, and depth and the dimension equations are used to fabricate the manufactured stone blocks.
The manufactured stone blocks of the '116 publication enjoy many of the benefits of conventional bricks, such as having a space between the manufactured stone block wall and the side of the building to act as an insulating space, while also providing the appearance of a “natural” stone wall. Additionally, the stone blocks are dimensionally compatible with conventional bricks and manufactured stone block sections may be easily interspersed into a brick wall. Further, masons do not need to undergo substantial amounts of training to learn the method of building structures out of the manufactured stone blocks, since they are laid in a similar manner to conventional bricks with mortar and typical mortar joints, unlike stone tiles which required a mason to learn a new method of building a structure.
However, the manufactured stone blocks of the '116 publication may not be sufficient to simulate the appearance of all natural stone walls. For example, as shown in
These needs are addressed by the stone fabrication system of the present invention. A hidden mortar joint is included in the manufactured stone blocks which is not visible on the external face of the brick including the natural stone appearance in order to provide the appearance of a dry-stack wall, while also providing a joint for application of mortar or grout to hold the manufactured stone in place and provide strength to the wall. Additionally, multiple simulated stone portions may be molded into the externally facing side of the manufactured stone block, thereby providing the dimensional compatibility advantages described in the '116 publication while also providing the appearance of irregularly shaped stones.
Further advantages of the invention will become known by reference to the detailed description when considered in conjunction with the figures, which are not to scale so as to more clearly show certain details, wherein like reference numbers indicate like elements throughout the several views, and wherein:
Referring now to
The manufactured stone block 22 preferable has a generally parallelpiped configuration. For example, in one embodiment shown in
Also, the blocks 22 could have any desired dimensions. In one embodiment of the invention, the blocks 22 are provided with substantially uniform overall dimensions to allow for case of construction In another embodiment of the invention, the length 26, depth 30, and the height 28 are based on compatibility factors, similar to the manufactured stone blocks described in the '116 publication. The compatibility factors allow the manufacturer of the manufactured stone blocks 22 to fabricate numerous shapes and sizes of manufactured stone blocks 22 that may be used in conjunction with one another and in conjunction with other types of building materials to build a structure. The dimensions of the manufactured stone blocks 22 are proportional so that various sizes of manufactured stone blocks 22 may be used in conjunction to build a structure. The compatibility factors are preferably determined based on the dimensions of a conventional brick, or compressed earth block (“CEB”). The dimensions of a compressed earth block in the United States typically include a length of about eight (8) inches, a height of about two and one quarter (2.25) inches, and a depth of about four (4) inches. Additionally, the typical mortar joint is about ¼ inches thick. Thus, the manufactured stone blocks 22 according to the present invention may have a compatibility factor for the length 26 of 8 inches in a preferred embodiment. The compatibility factor for the height 28 of the front face 39 of the block may be 2.5 inches (the typical height of a CEB plus the typical width of a mortar joint). The compatibility factor for the depth 30 may be four (4) inches but remains constant, that is, the manufactured stones 22 are preferably manufactured with dimensions at multiples of the compatibility factors for length 26 and height 28, but typically have a substantially constant depth 30, which is substantially equal to the depth 30 of a compressed earth block. One motivation and advantage behind sizing manufactured stone blocks 22 based on their CEB counterparts is that the manufactured stone blocks 22 and the CEBs may be easily used in conjunction if their shapes are proportional.
In the embodiment shown in
In a preferred embodiment of the invention, a hidden mortar joint 48 is located on a portion of the upper face 42 of the manufactured stone block 22. The hidden mortar joint 48 allows for construction of a wall with a simulated stone, dry-stack appearance, while also having the advantages of the strength provided by mortar between adjacent blocks. In one embodiment, the hidden mortar joint 48 is a recessed portion of the upper face, extending the length of the manufactured stone block and typically extending about 2 to 3 inches from the rear face 38 towards the front face 39. The hidden mortar joint is recessed downward from the upper face about ¼ to ½ inches. However, in other embodiments, the hidden mortar joint 48 may have various suitable dimensions and be located at various positions of the upper face. For example, the hidden mortar joint 48 may not extend the entire length of the upper face, but may only extend along a portion of the length or may be intermittently formed along the length.
The hidden mortar joint may have various configurations. In one embodiment, as shown in
In a preferred embodiment, as shown in
Additionally, certain manufactured stone blocks may have embodiments with different overall dimensions or different face features. For example, as shown in
In additional alternate embodiments, the hidden mortar joint may be a recess that is not adjacent the rear portion of the top face of the block, but may be located in a mid portion of the top and/or bottom face. In such an embodiment, the front face 39 and rear face 38 of the block 22 may both have molded stone features. This could be potentially useful when building free-standing walls, rather than walls wherein the rear face would not typically be seen.
In use when building a wall, manufactured stone blocks are stacked upon each other. A first layer of multiple blocks 22 are laid side by side to form a base layer. This base layer is typically placed adjacent an unfinished wall of a structure, such as a house, with the front face 39 of the blocks facing outwardly from the structure. However, in certain embodiments, the wall may be formed independently and free-standing without any relationship to any other structure. Next, mortar is placed into the hidden mortar joint 48. Thereafter, a second layer of blocks 22 is laid on top of the first layer of blocks with a portion of the bottom face 44 of the second layer of blocks resting substantially directly on the unrecessed portion 52 of the upper face 42 of the first layer of blocks. Substantially the remaining portion of the bottom face of the second layer of blocks rests on the mortar placed in the hidden mortar joint 48, thereby, upon curing of the mortar, providing a mechanism for holding together the layers of manufactured stone block.
In certain embodiments, it may desirable to fill and compress the head joints to provide extra strength. In such embodiments, compatible colored mortar should be used as the mortar may be partially visible, especially if hidden mortar joints are not included on side faces of the blocks. If desired or needed due to codes, wall ties and weep holes can be used similar to a brick-constructed wall. In certain structures where the top surface of the wall will be visible, it may be necessary to use a block as shown in
The manufactured stone blocks with hidden mortar joints allow a wall to be built with strength similar to full bed masonry. However, since the mortar joint is not substantially visible on the front face 39 of the manufactured stone block 22, a structure constructed from the manufactured stone blocks of the present invention will provide the appearance of a dry-stack wall, with limited grout visible to an observer of the external portion of the structure. Additionally, the manufactured stone blocks may be used by a mason to build a structure using building methods substantially similar to methods used in building structures with bricks with visible mortar joints using a trowel and other typical equipment, rather than forcing the mason to learn new building methods.
The foregoing description of embodiments for this invention have been presented for purposes of illustration and description. They are not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the invention to the precise form disclosed. Obvious modifications or variations are possible in light of the above teachings. The embodiments are chosen and described in an effort to provide the best illustrations of the principles of the invention and its practical application, and to thereby enable one of ordinary skill in the art to utilize the invention in various embodiments and with various modifications as is suited to the particular use contemplated. All such modifications and variations are within the scope of the invention as determined by the appended claims when interpreted in accordance with the breadth to which they are fairly, legally, and equitably entitled.
This application claims priority under 35 U.S.C. §119(e) to U.S. provisional application Ser. No. 60/989,640, filed Nov. 21, 2007.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1419805 | Bigler | Jun 1922 | A |
1681028 | Chapin | Aug 1928 | A |
1789099 | Fusco et al. | Jan 1931 | A |
2243069 | Brown | May 1941 | A |
2305280 | Strunk et al. | Dec 1942 | A |
3936989 | Hancock | Feb 1976 | A |
4229123 | Heinzmann | Oct 1980 | A |
4665673 | Diana | May 1987 | A |
5791827 | Arvai et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5802797 | Storer-Folt | Sep 1998 | A |
6371700 | Rich | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6539684 | Graham | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6616382 | Woolford et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6682269 | Price et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
7208112 | Scherer | Apr 2007 | B2 |
20030126821 | Scherer et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20040006943 | Weick | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20060110223 | Dawson et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20080110116 | Brown et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1982-0000437 | Mar 1982 | KR |
10-2004-0049657 | Jun 2004 | KR |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090126301 A1 | May 2009 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60989640 | Nov 2007 | US |