The present invention relates in general to wheelchairs and specifically to wheelchairs having anti-tip wheels. More particularly, the invention relates to the use of an anti-tip stop for limiting the range of motion the anti-tip wheels.
Wheelchairs are land vehicles that are provided for transporting the physically impaired. Wheelchairs generally include a base frame supported on a supporting surface by a pair of idler wheels and a pair of drive wheels. The drive wheels may be manually driven by a wheelchair occupant or power driven by motors controlled by the wheelchair occupant. The wheelchair may be maneuvered by differentially driving the drive wheels. The idler wheels are generally in the form of casters, typically located in front of the drive wheels. The casters swivel to enhance the maneuverability of the wheelchair. Optionally, the wheelchair may include a pair of anti-tip wheels, typically located to rear of the drive wheels, which function to enhance the stability of the wheelchair.
The drive wheels have historically supported a rear portion of the wheelchair base frame while casters have supported a front portion of the wheelchair. However, the drive wheels of late have supported a front portion of the base frame as well. The former wheelchairs are commonly referred to as rear-wheel drive wheelchairs while the later wheelchairs are commonly referred to as mid-wheel drive wheelchairs. The casters of rear-wheel drive wheelchairs are typically located towards the front of the base frame. The casters of mid-wheel drive wheelchairs typically located towards the rear of the base frame.
Tipping is a potential problem with wheelchairs, and can occur when accelerating, or traversing obstacles or unlevel terrain. Tipping may also occur in wheelchairs that are provided with reclining seats. Anti-tip wheels are commonly attached to wheelchairs to reduce the risk of wheelchairs tipping over. Anti-tip wheels are usually attached to the rear end of rear-wheel drive wheelchairs and to the front end of mid-wheel drive wheelchairs. The anti-tip wheels are typically fixed in place or limited to a predetermined range of motion. This may have an undesirable affect on the operation of the wheelchair. For example, if the anti-tip wheels are fixed in place the mobility of the wheelchair may be impaired by the limited range of motion of the anti-tip wheels and make maneuverability difficult. Additionally, for example if the anti-tip wheels are limited to a predetermined range of motion and the range of motion is too large then the anti-tip wheels may fail to add stability since they would not provide resistance until after the wheelchair has become unstable. Conversely, if the range of motion is too small then the wheelchair may experience the same problems as when the anti-tip wheels are fixed in place.
It would be advantageous if there could be developed an improved anti-tip system that provides stability while maintaining the mobility and maneuverability of a wheelchair.
An anti-tip adjustable stop for a wheelchair is disclosed.
According to the invention there is provided an anti-tip system for a wheelchair including an arm having an attachment end and a distal end, wherein the arm is pivotably mounted at the attachment end on a wheelchair frame. The wheelchair frame includes a wheelchair frame member. An anti-tip wheel is rotatably connected to the distal end of the arm, and a stop for limiting the range of motion of the arm relative to the wheelchair frame member is operably located between the arm and the frame member.
According to this invention there is also provided an arm having an attachment end, and a distal end, wherein the arm is pivotally mounted at the attachment end by a resilient hinge on a wheelchair frame, the wheelchair frame including a wheelchair frame member. An anti-tip wheel is rotatably connected to the distal end of the arm, wherein the arm includes a threaded bore. An adjustable stop for limiting the range of motion of the arm relative to the wheelchair frame member is also provided. The stop is operably located between the arm and the frame member, wherein the stop includes a threaded bolt, a lock nut and a resilient bumper, wherein the threaded bolt is disposed in the threaded bore.
According to the invention there is also provided a wheelchair having such an anti-tip system.
Various objects and advantages of this invention will become apparent to those skilled in the art from the following detailed description of the preferred embodiment, when read in light of the accompanying drawings.
Referring now to the drawings, there is illustrated in
The wheelchair 10 includes a seat portion 18. The seat portion 18 includes a seat frame (not shown), which supports a seat cushion 20 for the support of an occupant. The wheelchair 10 includes a seat back 22. The seat back 22 includes a back frame 23 and a seat back cushion 23a, which provide support to the occupant's body. The wheelchair 10 also includes an optional headrest 24, which supports the occupant's head. The occupant's arms can be supported by armrests 26. A footrest 30 is provided and optional leg rests (not shown) may be provided.
As best seen in
The wheelchair 10 includes an adjustable stop 50. The stop 50 preferably includes a threaded bolt 52 and a bumper 54 on a first end 56 of the bolt 52, as shown in
As shown in
When the arm 38 pivots, for example because of unlevel terrain or displacement of the occupant's weight, the arm 38 will pivot toward the frame member 62 of the base frame 13a. The arm 38 is pivotably mounted so that the arm 38 can “swing up” or pivot. The arm 38 is preferably pivotably mounted upon the base frame 13a at the pivot point 48 by the resilient hinge connection 48a so that there will be some resistance or resiliency to the “upward swing” or pivot of the arm 38. When the arm 38 reaches a predetermined position relative to the frame member 62, the stop 50 limits the range of motion of the arm 38, and in turn the anti-tip wheel 34, relative to the base frame 13a, thereby providing stability to the wheelchair 10. Thus, when the stop 50 limits the range of motion, the stop is operably connected to the arm 38 and the frame member 62. This means that the stop 50 is fully engaged, without space between the arm 38 and the frame member 62, to limit the range of motion of the arm 38 relative to the frame member 62. Thus, at some point in the “upward swing” or pivot, the resiliency effect reaches its limit and the arm 38 can pivot no farther. Thus, the stop 50 is operably connected to the arm 38 and the frame member 62, generally meaning that the stop 50 is in a position between the arm 38 and the frame member 62, without space there between, and limiting the range of motion of the arm 38 relative to the frame member 62. When the bumper 54 engages the frame member 62 the bumper 54 allows a small amount of additional travel while providing some resistance. Thus, the bumper 54 increases the smoothness of the ride by providing some resiliency to the stop 50 in addition to the resiliency of the hinge connection 48a.
The limit of the range of motion of the arm 38 relative to the frame member 62 may be adjusted by increasing or decreasing the extent to which the threaded bolt 52 is screwed into the treaded bore 60. This adjustment decreases or increases the distance of the bumper 54 from the arm 38, and thus decreases or increases the limit of the range of motion of the arm 38 and the rear anti-tip wheel 34. The limit of the range of motion may be further adjusted by selecting a different threaded bore 60 for the stop 50 to threadably engage. The use of the stop 50 thus allows the extent of the pivotal movement of the arm 38 to be readily adjusted to meet the needs of a particular wheelchair occupant or user.
As shown in
When the arm 38 pivots, for example because of unlevel terrain or displacement of the occupant's weight, the arm 38 will pivot toward a frame member 62 of the base frame 13a. As previously discussed, the arm 38 is pivotably mounted so that the arm 38 can “swing up” or pivot and preferably by the resilient hinge connection 48a. When the arm 38 reaches a predetermined position relative to the frame member 62 the bumper 54 engages the threaded bolt 52, thus the stop 50 is operably connected to the arm 38 and the frame member 62. The stop 50 thus limits the range of motion of the arm 38, and in turn the anti-tip wheel 34, relative to the base frame 13a, and provides stability to the wheelchair 10.
As discussed previously, the range of motion of the arm 38 relative to the frame member 62 may be adjusted by increasing or decreasing the extent to which of the threaded bolt 52 engages the treaded bore 64, in this case, thus decreasing or increasing the amount of the threaded bolt 52 extending from the frame member 62, and thus decreasing or increasing the range of motion. The limit of the range of motion may be further adjusted by selecting a different threaded bore 64 for the threaded bolt 52 to threadably engage. The lock nut 58 may then be adjusted toward the frame member 62 to secure the threaded bolt 52 in place, relative to the frame member 62. The use of the stop 50 thus allows the extent of the pivotal movement of the arm 38 to be readily adjusted to meet the needs of a particular wheelchair occupant or user.
While the invention has been described in its preferred embodiment with rear anti-tip wheels 34, it must be understood, however, that the anti-tip wheel 34 and the arm 38 may be placed in any suitable location upon the wheelchair 10. Further, while the invention has been illustrated in its preferred embodiment with the frame member 62 being a vertical frame member, it must be understood, however, that the frame member 62 may be any suitable frame member.
In accordance with the provisions of the patent statutes, the principle and mode of operation of this invention have been explained and illustrated in its preferred embodiment. However, it must be understood that this invention may be practiced otherwise than as specifically explained and illustrated without departing from its spirit or scope.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4877260 | Howland | Oct 1989 | A |
5137295 | Peek | Aug 1992 | A |
5181733 | Tague | Jan 1993 | A |
6041876 | Pulver et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6131679 | Pulver et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6460641 | Kral | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6494474 | Kramer, Jr. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6533306 | Watkins | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6543798 | Schaffner et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6601863 | Mentessi et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6688437 | Usherovich | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6851711 | Goertzen et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6938923 | Mulhern et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
20030201632 | Mulhern et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030205420 | Mulhern et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040094944 | Goertzen et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040188152 | Schaffner | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20060097478 | Goertzen et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
WO2004016451 | Feb 2004 | WO |