Storage battery using a uniform mix of conductive and nonconductive granules in a lithium bromide electrolyte

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 9666898
  • Patent Number
    9,666,898
  • Date Filed
    Wednesday, May 25, 2016
    8 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, May 30, 2017
    7 years ago
  • Inventors
  • Examiners
    • Williams; Arun
    Agents
    • Young Basile Hanlon & MacFarlane, P.C.
Abstract
A rechargeable battery is provided with a bed of particles comprising a mixture of conductive carbon granules and nonconductive granules.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to a novel type of storage battery which is distinguished by its unique electrochemistry. Both positive and negative electrodes are fabricated from graphite. The electrolyte comprises an organic solution of lithium bromide. The solvent is selected from the group of lactones. Upon charging the cell a carbon bromine compound is formed at the positive electrode and a lithium carbon compound is formed at the negative electrode.


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

First commercialized in the early 1990's, lithium-ion batteries are now ubiquitous. They power everything from cellphones to laptop computers to electric cars. The rapid growth of this new type of battery was sparked by several advantages including higher energy density, relatively high cell voltage, and longer charge retention or shelf life.


There are many variations of lithium ion batteries, but they all rely on the same basic chemistry. A positive electrode is made of an intercalation compound such as lithium cobalt oxide, and a negative electrode typically is lithium graphite. The electrolyte is a solution of a lithium salt such as lithium phosphorus fluoride dissolved in an aprotic organic solvent like propylene carbonate. During the operation of the cell as it is repeatedly charged and discharged, lithium ions shuttle back and forth between the positive and negative electrodes.


In spite of the successes with lithium-ion batteries, these cells have a number of drawbacks. For one, they have a low rate of discharge or power capability. Second, they have limited cycle life. And finally, they have exhibited safety problems due to the flammability of their components. Not to be overlooked, the relative high cost of lithium-ion batteries has slowed their acceptance into new applications.


For these and other reasons there is a compelling need to find an improved secondary battery. The ideal battery would retain the best features of the lithium-ion battery but avoid or minimize its disadvantages. Therefore, it is a goal of the present invention to provide such a step forward in battery technology. These and other objects, features and advantages of the present invention will be recognized from the following description and the accompanying FIGURE.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

A storage battery is fabricated using conductive and nonconductive particles for electrodes. The particles are mixed in a suitable container. The electrolyte is prepared by dissolving lithium bromide in a solvent selected from the group of lactones. The lactones include butyrolactone and valerolactone.


During charging of the cell, bromine ions are attracted to the positive electrode forming a carbon bromine compound. The process is reversed upon the discharge of the cell.


Various co-solvents may be employed in the electrolyte. These include acetone and diethyl ether. The configuration of the electrodes is not fixed. They may be in the form of sheets, fibers or particles in order to maximize the electrode surface area. As required, a separator may be employed between the positive and negative electrodes to isolate them electrically.


Optionally, the negative electrode may be fabricated from silicon.





BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE DRAWINGS

The description herein makes reference to the accompanying drawings wherein like reference numerals refer to like parts throughout the several views and wherein:



FIG. 1 is a diagrammatic rendering of a prototype of the battery covered by the present invention. The principal components of the cell are illustrated in the FIGURE.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE ILLUSTRATIVE EMBODIMENT

The lithium bromide battery of the present invention comprises unique features that lead to its outstanding performance. The electrodes are fabricated in the form of a mixture of conductive and nonconductive particles. The conductive particles are carbon granules. The nonconductive particles can be silicon granules. During the operation of the battery these electrodes form complexes. The positive carbon electrode, upon charging the cell, forms a carbon bromine compound. These reactions are illustrated by the following equations.

C+Br→CBr+e  1.

and at the negative electrode

C+Li++e LiC  2.

Combining equations 1 and 2 the following expression is obtained for the overall operation.

2C+Br−+Li+→CBr+LiC  3.

Upon discharge these reactions are reversed.


In reality, the graphite compounds formed with bromine and lithium may differ in composition from the formulas shown above. For example, graphite reacts with lithium to give the compound LiC6. Also, graphite forms the compound C8Br when exposed to bromine vapor.


The composition of the electrolyte is critical to the success of the battery. The challenge is to find a solvent for lithium bromide. This solvent is an aprotic organic compound characterized by its low reactivity with lithium. A further requirement is that the solvent provide good ionic conductivity. To meet the wide applications for the battery, the solvent needs to have a low melting point and a high boiling point. Additionally, the solvent should be compatible with the other components of the cell.


These and other advantages of a solvent were found in a particular class of compounds comprising the lactones. These compounds are unique in that their cyclic structures contain five or six membered rings. Because the ring compounds are stable their formation is promoted.


A prototype of the battery of the present invention is shown in FIG. 1. The cell is fabricated from container 1, which holds a bed 2 of particles comprising a mixture of conductive carbon granules shown black and nonconductive silicon granules shown light. This bed of particles functions as both the positive and negative electrodes. The container is filled with electrolyte 3, a solution of lithium bromide in a lactone. Electrical leads 4 and 5 extend down into the bed of particles.


The ratio of conductive carbon granules to nonconductive granules can be adjusted in order to change the electrical conductivity of the particle bed 2. In this manner the internal resistivity of the cell can be reduced without causing a short circuit. The proportion of conductive carbon particles will depend on the geometry of the cell. As FIG. 1 demonstrates, strands of conductive carbon particles, colored black in the diagram, will extend from each of the leads but fail to reach the opposite lead.


EXAMPLE

A Pyrex® test tube 1 inch in diameter by 6 inches high was used for the cell. A granular mix was prepared from 3.8 gm. graphite powder −200 mesh and 19.4 gm. silicon powder −100 mesh. This mix filled the test tube to about 3 inches high. Electrical leads were two graphite rods ¼ inch diameter by 6 inches long. The electrolyte was prepared by dissolving 7.2 gm. lithium bromide in 50 ml. gamma valerolactone. After charging the cell at 15 volts for ten minutes a cell potential of 3.58 volts was achieved.


The mechanism for the solvation of lithium bromide by lactones can be explained as follows.




embedded image



Where the lactone is butyrolactone.


The physical constants of the lactones are highly favorable. Gamma butyrolactone has a melting point of −45° C. and a boiling point of 204° to 205° C. Gamma valerolactone melts at −31° C. and boils at 207° to 208° C. Finally, delta valerolactone has a melting point of −13° to −12° C. and boils at 226° to 229° C.


Various co-solvents may be used in the preparation of the electrolyte. For example, lithium bromide is reported to dissolve in acetone as well as acetonitrile. The salt also has limited solubility in diethyl ether. The advantages of using a co-solvent are several fold. The liquid range can be extended. Also, the viscosity can be reduced thereby improving ionic mobility.


The design of the lithium bromide battery of the present invention is flexible. Both electrodes can be fabricated from graphite. These electrodes can take any shape. In addition, granular or powdered graphite can be used. One possible configuration is a bipolar cell.


While the invention has been described in connection with what is presently considered to be the most practical and preferred embodiment, it is to be understood that the invention is not to be limited to the disclosed embodiments but, on the contrary, is intended to cover various modifications and equivalent arrangements included within the spirit and scope of the appended claims, which scope is to be accorded the broadest interpretation so as to encompass all such modifications and equivalent structures as is permitted under the law.

Claims
  • 1. A storage battery comprising: (a) a container substantially filled with a bed of substantially uniformly mixed particles comprising conductive carbon granules and nonconductive granules;(b) two electrical leads in the bed of granules, each lead contacting both conductive and nonconductive granules; and(c) an electrolyte consisting of a solution of lithium bromide dissolved in a lactone.
  • 2. The storage battery of claim 1 wherein the lactone is a gamma valerolactone.
  • 3. The storage batter of claim 1 wherein the lactone is a gamma butyrolactone.
  • 4. The storage battery of claim 1 wherein the lactone is a delta valerolactone.
  • 5. The storage battery of claim 1 wherein the nonconductive granules are silicon.
CROSS REFERENCE OF CO-PENDING APPLICATION

This application is a continuation-in-part of co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/337,388 filed Jul. 22, 2014, entitled “LITHIUM STORAGE BATTERY,” the content of which is incorporated herein in its entirety.

US Referenced Citations (68)
Number Name Date Kind
145494 Duvall Dec 1873 A
195511 Jones Sep 1877 A
300900 Saum Jun 1884 A
317082 Boyle May 1885 A
343367 Froome Jun 1886 A
346619 Sohall Aug 1886 A
3833427 Land et al. Sep 1974 A
3862261 Stoddard Jan 1975 A
3862861 McClelland et al. Jan 1975 A
3862862 Gillibrand et al. Jan 1975 A
3887399 Seiger Jun 1975 A
3964927 Villarreal-Dominguez Jun 1976 A
3976509 Tsai et al. Aug 1976 A
4076909 Lindstrom Feb 1978 A
4079174 Beck et al. Mar 1978 A
4107407 Koch Aug 1978 A
4268589 Tamminen May 1981 A
4269911 Fukuoka et al. May 1981 A
4327157 Himy et al. Apr 1982 A
4352869 Mellors Oct 1982 A
4681981 Brotz Jul 1987 A
4830718 Stauffer May 1989 A
4849310 Schlaikjer Jul 1989 A
5034291 Jacus Jul 1991 A
5264298 Townsend Nov 1993 A
5344528 Bossler et al. Sep 1994 A
5346783 Tomantschger et al. Sep 1994 A
5462821 Onoue et al. Oct 1995 A
5512144 Stauffer Apr 1996 A
5575901 Hulme et al. Nov 1996 A
5599637 Pecherer et al. Feb 1997 A
5641591 Kawakami et al. Jun 1997 A
5705050 Sampson et al. Jan 1998 A
6010604 Stauffer Jan 2000 A
6117196 Snyder et al. Sep 2000 A
6183914 Yao et al. Feb 2001 B1
6235167 Stauffer May 2001 B1
6787265 Phillips Sep 2004 B2
7947391 Stauffer May 2011 B2
8927143 Stauffer Jan 2015 B2
8940445 Stauffer Jan 2015 B2
9147912 Stauffer Sep 2015 B2
20020042986 Sato et al. Apr 2002 A1
20020068222 Ishii et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020106560 Kolb et al. Aug 2002 A1
20030077517 Nakanishi et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030151392 Stone et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030190524 Phillips Oct 2003 A1
20040033191 Wietelmann et al. Feb 2004 A1
20060222945 Bowden et al. Oct 2006 A1
20070009771 Leddy et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070111096 Kobayashi et al. May 2007 A1
20070134553 Kobayashi et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070190410 Kobayashi et al. Aug 2007 A1
20080096078 Miyake Apr 2008 A1
20090053596 Stauffer Feb 2009 A1
20090169978 Smith et al. Jul 2009 A1
20100047697 Stauffer Feb 2010 A1
20100099018 Kawase et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100248014 Huang Sep 2010 A1
20100261053 Stauffer Oct 2010 A1
20110171536 Oki et al. Jul 2011 A1
20110262803 Huang et al. Oct 2011 A1
20110274988 Fan et al. Nov 2011 A1
20120171574 Zhamu et al. Jul 2012 A1
20130045415 Stauffer Feb 2013 A1
20130252083 Stauffer Sep 2013 A1
20150207175 Stauffer Jul 2015 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (3)
Number Date Country
0091520 Oct 1983 EP
2009266675 Nov 2009 JP
2015112855 Jul 2015 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (4)
Entry
CAMEO Chemicals, “Chemical Datasheet Polypropylene Glycol”, Chemical Identifiers, CAMEO Chemicals version 2.5, rev. 1, CAS No. 25322-69-4, http://cameochemicals.noaa.gov/report?key=CH9002, Date unknown.
Chemical Book 2008, Poly(propylene glycol) (25322-69-4), Suppliers List, Basic Information, http://www.chemicalbook.com/ProductChemicalPropertiesCB4123367—EN.htm.
M. Dickey et al., “Eutectic Gallium-Indium (EGaIn): A Liquid Metal Alloy for the Formation of Stable Structures in Microchannels at Room Temperature”, Advanced Functional Materials, vol. 18, pp. 1097-1104 (2008).
M.L.B. Rao, “Investigations of an Alkaline Eelctroylyte for Zn—PbO2 Cells”, J. Electyrochem. Soc.: Electrochemical Science and Technology, vol. 120, No. 7, pp. 855-857, Jul. 1973.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20160268624 A1 Sep 2016 US
Continuation in Parts (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 14337388 Jul 2014 US
Child 15164168 US