The present invention relates to storage and retrieval configurations in a computer system, in particular to storage of application specific profiles that correlate to various document versions of an application and retrieval of the same.
Typical storage and retrieval configurations in a computer system provide a user with resources to store digital files such as word processing files, email files, etc., and to retrieve the digital files when desired. These digital files of the computer system are commonly backed up to a new location on the computer system itself or even to a completely different and separate storage facility such as a magnetic tape, a different disk drive, etc. Backing up digital files provides an alternate source(s) to access the digital files when the digital files have become corrupted, lost, written over, no longer accessible due to hardware failure, etc. Retrieving or storing a digital file in this manner may consume inordinate amounts of time, especially when the file was stored in a location such as a magnetic tape.
Many other problems and disadvantages of the prior art will become apparent to one skilled in the art after comparing such prior art with the present invention as described herein.
Various aspects of the present invention may be realized through a computer system that includes a processor for operating a software application in the computer system. The software application provides for creation, storage, and retrieval of a file, the file having a corresponding profile that the software application uses for at least the purpose of preparing the software application to display the file upon its retrieval by the software application. Also included is a plurality of storage media that are communicatively coupled to the processor. A storage management module distributes stored files and their accompanying profiles among the plurality of storage media according to predetermined patterns. One of such predetermined patterns is separate storage of a file and the file's corresponding profile.
The computer system may have at least one of the plurality of storage media located locally, or on the other hand located remotely, or even both locally and remotely. The separate storage by the storage management module in the computer system is configured to provide more rapid retrieval of the application specific profile than of the file associated with the application specific profile. The profiles that are stored among the plurality of storage media often include different profiles for different versions of a corresponding file. In some embodiments of the present invention, the storage management module provides concurrent access of the profile and the file. The profile is typically retrieved prior to the file and sets up the software application in preparation for receipt of the file.
Various aspects of the present invention may also be realized through an application specific profile storage and retrieval system that includes at least a software application that creates files with corresponding profiles specific to the software application and each of the files that are created. The software application is operable by a processor and a plurality of storage media are selectively used by the processor to store the application specific profiles separately from the files. A storage management module is included that is operable by the processor and that manages storage of the application specific profiles and the files such that application specific profiles may be retrieved separately from the corresponding file itself. The application specific profile storage and retrieval system may have many variations, including variations such as listed in relation to the computer system described above.
A method for storage and retrieval in a computer system according to principles of the present invention may also be realized by, not necessarily in the following order, creating a file with a software application that creates a corresponding profile that accompanies the file with each access of the file, a new profile being created at least each time the file is saved; sending the file, with the software application, to a storage management module that manages storage of the file with its accompanying profile; storing the file and its accompanying profile to separate storage locations in the computer system; requesting for the retrieval of the file with the software application such that the storage management module retrieves the file with its accompanying profile as though the file and its accompanying profile were located in a single position; and formatting the software application with the retrieved profile prior to display of the file with the software application.
The method may require that the software application is selected from the group consisting of a word processor, an engineering graphics program, a standard graphics program, and a web browser. Further, a different profile is commonly stored with the storage of each version of the file as the file is created. Finally, the storage management module typically distributes different files and versions of those files in a first set of storage media and stores different profiles for each of the files and version of those files in a second set of storage media.
Other aspects of the present invention will become apparent with further reference to the drawings and specification which follow.
A better understanding of the present invention can be obtained when the following detailed description of the drawings is considered in conjunction with the following drawings.
The software application 104 could be any number of applications such as a word processor, a graphic design program, a web browser, etc., as long as the software application 104 has a profile 112 corresponding to files that are created or edited with the software program 104. The profile 112 contains different settings that are used during editing of the file with the software program 104. For example, when the software program 104 is a word processor such as Microsoft Word, a profile may contain numerous settings, such as a setting to prevent “Autocorrecting” (i.e., automatic correcting of certain misspelled text such as automatically transposing the “t” and the “h” in the three letter string “hte”), or a setting that contains various “bookmarks” of a file (i.e., a transparent location marker for quickly moving to a specific location in a document). The profile 112 may periodically change as a file is edited by the software application 104, but when the file is saved and editing is discontinued, the most recently used profile is saved with the file so that upon retrieval of the file at a later date the software application 104 will have a profile that is familiar to the last user and editing may continue at the same point that it ended on. Of course, the profile 112 retrieval and set up adds processing time to the computer system 100 when a file is retrieved. Advantageously, the storage management module 106 is configured to retrieve the profile 112 from the profile storage 108 concurrently with retrieval of the file from the other storage 110. In this manner, oftentimes the profile 112 is set up in the software application 104 prior to retrieval of the file from the other storage 110 and the delay in the profile 112 set up does not cause further delay in file retrieval.
The storage management module 106 may be a single module or a distributed computing system and, although illustrated as being either a storage or a retrieval module in the following figures, operates as both a storage and retrieval module. When operating as a retrieval module, the software application 104 has immediate access to the profile 112 regardless of the location of the file that is being retrieved from the other storage 110 by the software application 104. As stated, this immediate access of the profile 112 is advantageous, among other reasons, because the software application 104 is given time to set up while the requested file is being retrieved rather than performing set up after the requested file is finally retrieved. In other words, user specific settings for a particular file are immediately available to the software application 104 regardless of the file or version of the file that is being retrieved.
Concurrent access of the profile 112 from the profile storage 108 and the corresponding file data from the other storage 110 allows the software application 104 to be set up with user specific settings while the file is being retrieved. In this manner, when the file of the other storage 110 is viewed, the file has a familiar look to the most recent user, e.g., the user that has requested it. Of course, separate retrieval of the profile 112 requires separate storage of the same and as will be apparent and understood in the accompanying descriptions of the illustrated embodiments.
The computing device 202 includes software applications 210 and installed file system 212. When data is to be stored from the software application 210, the installed file system 212 begins interacting with a manager module 214 of the computing device 204. The manager module 214 includes storage policies 216, creation tools 218, and a master storage and backup map 220. In this embodiment, when the software application 210 is directed to store data, the data is sent to the installed file system and then the manager module 214 examines the storage policies 216 to determine the appropriate location for storage of the data and the accompanying profile. The master map 220 includes further information for directing the data to be sent to the computing device 206 where a media module 222 receives the data and the data is then stored in the appropriate storage media. A data index 224 in the media module 222 contains still further information regarding the location to store the data. From computing device 206, the data may be stored in the magnetic disc media 208 or an optical media 226.
The master storage and backup map 220 may direct the data to be stored in a computing device 228, rather than the computing device 206. In the event that data is to be stored in the computing device 228, a media module 230 determines exactly where the data is to be stored and updates a data index 232 when the data is stored in one of the storage media such as the optical media 226 or a magnetic tape media 234.
The master storage and backup map 220 could also send the data to a computing device 236 where a media module 238 determines that the data will be placed at a different location and this information is updated in a data index 240 before the data is finally sent to other storage 242.
As illustrated in
The logical view storage 306 provides the organizational scheme for storage and retrieval of information that is used in the computer system 300. Storage policies 314 are used to determine where and how particular information is to be stored. An analysis engine 316 is used to analyze the particular information that is being stored or retrieved, and based upon at least the information's storage policy and a file storage history 318, the analysis engine 316 determines the current location of the information of interest, either where to store the information or where to access the information. The file storage history 318 includes information such as a file location 320 and prior file locations 322. With the assistance of the analysis engine 316, the logical view storage 306 balances information storage among media devices (Type A, B, C, D, . . . N) 324 according to multiple factors such as factors that are found in the storage policies 314 and the file storage history 318.
Factors include things such as how different users of the application 302 are treated for file storage access, i.e., one user has initial storage of documents in media s device type A while another user has initial storage of documents in media device type B. The first user may have documents migrate from media device type A to B after a week and then from B to C after a month. The second user may only have documents migrate from media device type B to C after a month. The different storage variations are as varied as the different types of users that may use the application 302.
Another factor that could influence the organizational scheme of the logical view storage 306 is the type of application 302 that is storing or retrieving the information. For example, word processing applications may have a completely different storage scheme than spreadsheet or engineering drawing applications. Different applications may also access information at different frequencies, require different access times, perform editing or only viewing, etc., all of which could influence the organizational scheme of the logical view storage 306. The different media types 324 offer, among other things, different access times to accommodate the differing types of application 302.
The application 302 operates by means of a processor 326. The processor creates an index 328 to track storage of various profiles that are created to accompany files that are accessed in the application 302. For example, if the application 302 is a word processor and a new document is created, upon storage of the new document the index 328 will be updated for ease of tracking the storage location of the profile regardless of the logical view storage 306 determination of where the new document is to be stored. In this manner, the profile may be retrieved concurrently with a request for retrieval of the new document and the application 302 is able to be set up prior to receiving the new document, thereby expediting the time spent waiting for the new document to be accessible in the application 302. Various profiles specific to versions of the new document are stored in a profile storage 330 along with profiles from other applications other versions of other documents or files. Of course, those skilled in the art and viewing the present disclosure will understand that variations exist in the tools that are used to retrieve different files with their accompanying profiles.
The storage policies 402 are used to determine where and how particular information is to be stored. The analysis engine 404 is used to analyze the particular information that is being stored or retrieved, and based upon at least the information's storage policy and a file storage history 416, the analysis engine 404 determines the current location of the information of interest, either where to store the information or where to access the information. The file storage history 416 includes information such as a file location 418 and prior file locations 420.
The far left column illustrates the storage sequence name followed by a first storage I.D. in the second column. For example, if the application 302 is directing the storage of data, the analysis engine 316 would look to the storage policies 314. A default storage policy may include storing the data to the primary storage sequence 602 where the data would enter the first storage having an I.D. of 001. The data would be stored at the first storage I.D. for 13 weeks as indicated in the next column of the storage sequences 501. At this point the data would be moved to a second storage I.D. 005 where it would be stored for a duration of 26 weeks. After 26 weeks, the data would be moved to a third storage I.D. 002 for a duration of 52 weeks. This process would continue until the data is stored in an Nth storage I.D. 004. The primary storage sequence 602, of course, is an exemplary storage sequence, but is explained here to assist in understanding operations of all the illustrated storage sequences 501.
As can be seen from
Of particular note is the duplicate storage sequence 606. In the duplicate storage sequence 606, data is received at the analysis engine 316 where it is determined that the data should be copied to two separate storage locations, which are represented in the first storage I.D. column as 001 and 005. The 001 storage I.D. has been directed to store the data for 13 weeks, and then the data may be deleted. The data in the storage having I.D. 005 is directed to be stored for 39 weeks where it will then be moved to a second storage I.D. of 002 for a duration of 46 weeks, after which it will be moved to the nth storage I.D. 004.
Changes in user profile 806 are another reason for changing the storage sequences of the default system. Another factor for changing the default storage sequences is user network relocation 808. Still other factors include the available storage space 810 and added storage media 812. Of course, these are only exemplary factors and additional factors could be added to the storage sequence reselection 506.
When the data and storage management system 1000 is in operation, a software application 1016 on the computing device 1002 is used to interact with a word processing document, an engineering graphics file, or similar file (herein referred to as a “file”) depending on the type of the software application 1016. Installed file system/interface module 1018 interacts with a profile storage 1020 of the computing device 1002. As will be understood by those of ordinary skill in the art and viewing the present disclosure, the profile storage 1020 could be located on the computing device 1004, 1012, or other computing device to realize various aspects of the present invention.
The computing device 1004 includes a retrieval manager 1021 with a master storage and backup map 1022 that directs requests for a file to one of the computing devices 1006 and 1008. At the computing devices 1006 and 1008, respective media modules 1024 and 1026 exist to help the retrieval request know where the desired file with its accompanying profile (herein referred to as the “information”) is located. For further assistance in locating the desired information, the media module 1024 and 1026 include respective data indexes 1028 and 1030. In this manner, the software application 1016 is able to request information and the file of the information is retrieved from one of the storage media, i.e., magnetic disk media 1032, optical media 1034, or magnetic tape media 1036. Due to the storage and retrieval organization, the accompanying profile of is the file in the requested information is retrieved from its location concurrently and typically faster than the retrieval of the file itself.
Of course, the storage media illustrated in
Alternatively, the installed file system 1112 may interact with a storage area network 1128 across a network 1130, the network 1130 commonly being a high speed fibre network. The storage area network 1128 makes accessing storage media such as magnetic disk media 1132, optical media 1134, and magnetic tape media 1136 available without significant processing in the computing device 1102. To find the exact location of a file, a media module 1138 (shown in dashed lines to represent the optional nature of its location within the storage area network 1128) may be used to locate the file. In addition, a media module 1140 shown in dashed lines may be available to find the exact location of a file. Also shown in dashed lines is an extension of the network 1130 where the network attached storage 1122 may include a high speed connection with the computing devices 1102, 1104, and 1106. Finally, the storage area network 1128 may communicate directly with the network 1108 as indicated by dashed lines 1142.
Because the above detailed description is exemplary, when “one embodiment” is described, it is an exemplary embodiment. Accordingly, the use of the word “one” in this context is not intended to indicate that one and only one embodiment may have a described feature. Rather, many other embodiments may, and often do, have the described feature of the exemplary “one embodiment.” As used above, when the invention is described in the context of one embodiment, that one embodiment is one of many possible embodiments of the invention.
Notwithstanding the above caveat regarding the use of the words “one embodiment” in the detailed description, it will be understood by those within the art that if a specific number of an introduced claim element is intended, such an intent will be explicitly recited in the claim, and in the absence of such recitation no such limitation is present or intended. For example, in the claims below, when a claim element is described as having “one” feature, it is intended that that element be limited to one and only one of the feature described. Furthermore, when a claim element is described in the claims below as including or comprising “a” feature, it is not intended that the element be limited to one and only one of the feature described. Rather, for example, the claim including “a” feature reads upon an apparatus or method including one or more of the feature in question. That is, because the apparatus or method in question includes a feature, the claim reads on the apparatus or method regardless of whether the apparatus or method includes another such similar feature. This use of the word “a” as a nonlimiting, introductory article to a feature of a claim is adopted herein as being identical to the interpretation adopted by many courts in the past, notwithstanding any anomalous or precedential case law to the contrary that may be found. Similarly, when a claim element is described in the claims below as including or comprising an aforementioned feature (e.g., “the” feature), it is intended that that element not be limited to one and only one of the feature described. Furthermore, the use of introductory phrases such as “at least one” and “one or more” in the claims should not be construed to imply that the introduction of another claim element by the indefinite articles “a” or “an” limits any particular claim containing such introduced claim element to inventions containing only one such element, even when the same claim includes the introductory phrases “one or more” or “at least one” and indefinite articles such as “a” or “an.” The same holds true for the use of definite articles.
While particular embodiments of the present invention have been shown and described, based upon the teachings herein, various modifications, alternative constructions, and equivalents may be used without departing from the invention claimed herein. Consequently, the appended claims encompass within their scope all such changes, modifications, etc. as are within the true spirit and scope of the invention. Furthermore, it is to be understood that the invention is solely defined by the appended claims. The above description is not intended to present an exhaustive list of embodiments of the invention. Unless expressly stated otherwise, each example presented herein is a nonlimiting or nonexclusive example, whether or not the terms nonlimiting, nonexclusive or similar terms are contemporaneously expressed with each example. Although an attempt has been made to outline some exemplary embodiments and exemplary variations thereto, other embodiments and/or variations are within the scope of the invention as defined in the claims below.
The above-listed sections and included information are not exhaustive and are only exemplary for an application specific rollback system according to principles of the present invention. The particular sections and included information in a particular embodiment may depend upon the particular implementation and the included devices and resources. Although a system and method according to the present invention has been described in connection with the preferred embodiment, it is not intended to be limited to the specific form set forth herein, but on the contrary, it is intended to cover such alternatives, modifications, and equivalents, as can be reasonably included within the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/200,666, entitled “Storage of Application Specific Profiles Correlating to Document Versions,” filed Aug. 28, 2008, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,937,702,which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/882,438, entitled “Storage of Application Specific Profiles Correlating to Document Versions,” filed Jun. 14, 2001, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,434,219, which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/774,272, entitled “Email Attachment Management In A Computer System,” filed Jan. 30, 2001, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,155,481, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/179,343, entitled “Logical View With Granular Access to Exchange Data Managed by Modular Data and Storage Management Systems,” filed Jan. 31, 2000, all of which are incorporated by reference herein in their entireties.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4464122 | Fuller et al. | Aug 1984 | A |
4686620 | Ng | Aug 1987 | A |
4995035 | Cole et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
5005122 | Griffin et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5093912 | Dong et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5133065 | Cheffetz et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5193154 | Kitajima et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5212772 | Masters | May 1993 | A |
5212784 | Sparks | May 1993 | A |
5226157 | Nakano et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5239647 | Anglin et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5241668 | Eastridge et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5241670 | Eastridge et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5276860 | Fortier et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5276867 | Kenley et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5287500 | Stoppani, Jr. | Feb 1994 | A |
5321816 | Rogan et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5333315 | Saether et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5347653 | Flynn et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5386545 | Gombos, Jr. et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5410700 | Fecteau et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5448718 | Cohn et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5448724 | Hayashi | Sep 1995 | A |
5485606 | Midgdey et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5491810 | Allen | Feb 1996 | A |
5495607 | Pisello et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5504873 | Martin et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5517405 | McAndrew et al. | May 1996 | A |
5537568 | Yanai et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5544345 | Carpenter et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5544347 | Yanai et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5555371 | Duyanovich et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5559957 | Balk | Sep 1996 | A |
5564037 | Lam | Oct 1996 | A |
5608865 | Midgely et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5613134 | Lucus et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5619644 | Crockett et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5634052 | Morris | May 1997 | A |
5638509 | Dunphy et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5659614 | Bailey, III | Aug 1997 | A |
5666501 | Jones et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5673381 | Huai et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5673382 | Cannon et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5699361 | Ding et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5729743 | Squibb | Mar 1998 | A |
5740405 | DeGraaf | Apr 1998 | A |
5751997 | Kullick et al. | May 1998 | A |
5758359 | Saxon | May 1998 | A |
5758649 | Iwashita et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5761677 | Senator et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5764972 | Crouse et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5778165 | Saxon | Jul 1998 | A |
5778395 | Whiting et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5812398 | Nielsen | Sep 1998 | A |
5813009 | Johnson et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5813017 | Morris | Sep 1998 | A |
5860073 | Ferrel et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5864846 | Voorhees et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5875478 | Blumenau | Feb 1999 | A |
5887134 | Ebrahim | Mar 1999 | A |
5896531 | Curtis et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5901327 | Ofek | May 1999 | A |
5924102 | Perks | Jul 1999 | A |
5950205 | Aviani, Jr. | Sep 1999 | A |
5974563 | Beeler, Jr. | Oct 1999 | A |
5983239 | Cannon | Nov 1999 | A |
5991753 | Wilde | Nov 1999 | A |
6012053 | Pant et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6021415 | Cannon et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6026414 | Anglin | Feb 2000 | A |
6052735 | Ulrich et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6064821 | Shough et al. | May 2000 | A |
6073128 | Pongracz et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6076148 | Kedem | Jun 2000 | A |
6091518 | Anabuki et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6094416 | Ying | Jul 2000 | A |
6131095 | Low et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6131190 | Sidwell | Oct 2000 | A |
6148412 | Cannon et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6154787 | Urevig et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6161111 | Mutalik et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6167402 | Yeager | Dec 2000 | A |
6182198 | Hubis et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6212512 | Barney et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6226759 | Miller et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6239800 | Mayhew et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6253217 | Dourish et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6260069 | Anglin | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6266679 | Szalwinski et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6266784 | Hsiao et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6269431 | Dunham | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6275953 | Vahalia et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6298439 | Beglin | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6301592 | Aoyama et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6324581 | Xu et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6327590 | Chidlovskii et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6327612 | Watanabe et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6328766 | Long | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6330570 | Crighton | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6330642 | Carteau | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6341287 | Sziklai | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6343287 | Kumar et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6343324 | Hubis et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6345288 | Reed et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
RE37601 | Eastridge et al. | Mar 2002 | E |
6356801 | Goodman et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6363462 | Bergsten | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6367073 | Elledge | Apr 2002 | B2 |
6374363 | Wu et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6389432 | Pothapragada et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6418478 | Ignatius et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6421711 | Blumenau et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6442706 | Wahl et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6470332 | Weschler | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6484162 | Edlund et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6487561 | Ofek et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6487644 | Huebsch et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6502205 | Yanai et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6519679 | Devireddy et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6538669 | Lagueux, Jr. et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6540623 | Jackson | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6549918 | Probert, Jr. et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6557039 | Leong et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6564228 | O'Connor | May 2003 | B1 |
6593656 | Ahn et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6618771 | Leja et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6629110 | Cane et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6647399 | Zaremba | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6658526 | Nguyen et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6675177 | Webb | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6691232 | Wood et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6721767 | De Meno et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6732088 | Glance | May 2004 | B1 |
6732231 | Don et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6732244 | Ashton et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6745178 | Emens et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6795828 | Ricketts | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6816941 | Carlson et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6820070 | Goldman et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6839741 | Tsai | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6839803 | Loh et al. | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6850994 | Gabryjelski | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6860422 | Hull et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6865568 | Chau | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6871182 | Winnard et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6892221 | Ricart et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6948038 | Berkowitz et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6957186 | Guheen et al. | Oct 2005 | B1 |
6970997 | Shibayama et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6976039 | Chefalas et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6995675 | Curkendall et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
6996616 | Leighton et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7003641 | Prahlad et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7028079 | Mastrianni et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7035880 | Crescenti et al. | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7039860 | Gautestad | May 2006 | B1 |
7058661 | Ciaramitaro et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7099901 | Sutoh et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7107298 | Prahlad et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7107416 | Stuart et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7133870 | Tripp et al. | Nov 2006 | B1 |
7139826 | Watanabe et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7146387 | Russo et al. | Dec 2006 | B1 |
7155421 | Haldar | Dec 2006 | B1 |
7155481 | Prahlad et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7159081 | Suzuki | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7171468 | Yeung et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7171585 | Gail et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7188141 | Novaes | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7240100 | Wein et al. | Jul 2007 | B1 |
7246207 | Kottomtharayil et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7269664 | Hutsch et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7284033 | Jhanji | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7287047 | Kavuri | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7290017 | Wang et al. | Oct 2007 | B1 |
7313659 | Suzuki | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7328325 | Solis et al. | Feb 2008 | B1 |
7346623 | Prahlad et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7346676 | Swildens et al. | Mar 2008 | B1 |
7346751 | Prahlad et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7376947 | Evers | May 2008 | B2 |
7379978 | Anderson et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7386535 | Kalucha et al. | Jun 2008 | B1 |
7395282 | Crescenti et al. | Jul 2008 | B1 |
7424543 | Rice, III | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7434219 | De Meno et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7457790 | Kochunni et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7472142 | Prahlad et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7496841 | Hadfield et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7565484 | Ghosal et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7577689 | Masinter et al. | Aug 2009 | B1 |
7577694 | Nakano et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7584469 | Mitekura et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7587715 | Barrett et al. | Sep 2009 | B1 |
7593935 | Sullivan | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7596713 | Mani-Meitav et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7603626 | Williams et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7606844 | Kottomtharayil | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7610285 | Zoellner et al. | Oct 2009 | B1 |
7668884 | Prahlad et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7673175 | Mora et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7676542 | Moser et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7689899 | Leymaster et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7730031 | Forster | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7734593 | Prahlad et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7734669 | Kottomtharayil et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7751628 | Reisman | Jul 2010 | B1 |
7792789 | Prahlad et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7801871 | Gosnell | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7814118 | Kottomtharayil et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7827266 | Gupta | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7831793 | Chakravarty et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7840537 | Gokhale et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7844676 | Prahlad et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7865517 | Prahlad et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7882077 | Gokhale et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7882093 | Kottomtharayil et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7937393 | Prahlad et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7937420 | Tabellion et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7937702 | De Meno et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7984063 | Kottomtharayil et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8037028 | Prahlad et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8055627 | Prahlad et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8060514 | Arrouye et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
20020032878 | Karpf | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020049883 | Schneider et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020120858 | Porter et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20030046313 | Leung et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030050979 | Takahashi | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030101086 | San Miguel | May 2003 | A1 |
20040039689 | Penney et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040267815 | De Mes | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050039069 | Prahlad et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050097070 | Enis et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050251786 | Citron et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050278207 | Ronnewinkel | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060036619 | Fuerst et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060070061 | Cox et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060115802 | Reynolds | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060116999 | Dettinger et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060149604 | Miller | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060149724 | Ritter et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060224846 | Amarendran et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060282900 | Johnson et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070022145 | Kavuri | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070028229 | Knatcher | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070043715 | Kaushik et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070061266 | Moore et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070061298 | Wilson et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070166674 | Kochunni et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070250810 | Tittizer et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070296258 | Calvert et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080229037 | Bunte et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080243855 | Prahlad et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080282048 | Miura | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080288947 | Gokhale et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080288948 | Attarde et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080320319 | Muller et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090171883 | Kochunni et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090177719 | Kavuri | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090319534 | Gokhale | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090319585 | Gokhale | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090320029 | Kottomtharayil | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090320033 | Gokhale et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090320037 | Gokhale et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100031017 | Gokhale et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100070466 | Prahlad et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100070474 | Lad | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100070725 | Prahlad et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100070726 | Ngo et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100076932 | Lad | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100114837 | Prahlad et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20110093471 | Brockway et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110173207 | Kottomtharayil et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0259912 | Mar 1988 | EP |
0405926 | Jan 1991 | EP |
0467546 | Jan 1992 | EP |
0774715 | May 1997 | EP |
0809184 | Nov 1997 | EP |
0899662 | Mar 1999 | EP |
0910019 | Apr 1999 | EP |
0981090 | Feb 2000 | EP |
0986011 | Mar 2000 | EP |
1035690 | Sep 2000 | EP |
2216368 | Oct 1989 | GB |
07-046271 | Feb 1995 | JP |
7073080 | Mar 1995 | JP |
8044598 | Feb 1996 | JP |
2000035969 | Feb 2000 | JP |
2003531435 | Oct 2003 | JP |
WO-9513580 | May 1995 | WO |
WO-9912098 | Mar 1999 | WO |
WO-0058865 | Oct 2000 | WO |
WO-0106368 | Jan 2001 | WO |
WO-0116693 | Mar 2001 | WO |
WO-0180005 | Oct 2001 | WO |
Entry |
---|
U.S. Appl. No. 13/538,290, filed Jun. 29, 2012, Kottomtharayil. |
Pitoura et al., “Locating Objects in Mobile Computing”, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge amd Data Engineering, vol. 13, No. 4, Jul./Aug. 2001, pp. 571-592. |
Rowe et al., “Indexes for User Access to Large Video Databases”, Storage and Retrieval for Image and Video Databases II, IS,& T/SPIE Symp. On Elec. Imaging Sci. & Tech., Feb. 1994, pp. 1-12. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/343,034, filed Jan. 4, 2012, Prahlad. |
Hennessy et al., “Computer Architecture—A Quantitative Approach”, 2nd Edition, 1996, pp. 246-250. |
U.S. Appl. No. 09/609,977. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/076,792, filed Mar. 21, 2011, Kumarasamy. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/250,349, filed Sep. 30, 2011, Prahlad. |
Armstead et al., “Implementation of a Campus-wide Distributed Mass Storage Service: The Dream vs. Reality,” IEEE, 1995, pp. 190-199. |
Arneson, “Mass Storage Archiving in Network Environments,” Digest of Papers, Ninth IEEE Symposium on Mass Storage Systems, Oct. 31, 1988-Nov. 3, 1988, pp. 45-50, Monterey, CA. |
Cabrera et al, “ADSM: A Multi-Platform, Scalable, Backup and Archive Mass Storage System,” Digest of Papers, Compcon '95, Proceedings of the 40th IEEE Computer Society International Conference, Mar. 5, 1995-Mar. 9, 1995, pp. 420-427, San Francisco, CA. |
Eitel, “Backup and Storage Management in Distributed Heterogeneous Environments,” IEEE, 1994, pp. 124-126. |
Jander, M., “Launching Storage-Area Net,” Data Communications, US, McGraw Hill, NY, vol. 27, No. 4 (Mar. 21, 1998), pp. 64-72. |
Jason Gait, “The Optical File Cabinet: A Random-Access File System for Write-Once Optical Disks,” IEEE Computer, vol. 21, No. 6, pp. 11-22 (1988) (see in particular figure 5 in p. 15 and recitation in claim 5). |
Microsoft Press Computer Dictionary Third Edition, “Data Compression,” Microsoft Press, 1997, p. 130. |
Rosenblum et al., “The Design and Implementation of a Log-Structured File System,” Operating Systems Review S Those documents which are marked with a double asterisk (**) next to the Cite No. in the attached form PTO/SB/08 are not supplied because they were previously cited by or submitted to the Office in prior U.S. Appl. No. 09/991,900, filed Nov. 23, 2001 and relied upon in this application for an earlier filing date under 35 U.S.C. 120. IGOPS, vol. 25, No. 5, New York, US, pp. 1-15 (May 1991). |
Veeravalli, B., “Network Caching Strategies for a Shared Data Distribution for a Predefined Service Demand Sequence,” IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, vol. 15, No. 6, Nov./Dec. 2003, pp. 1487-1497. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110173171 A1 | Jul 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60179343 | Jan 2000 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12200666 | Aug 2008 | US |
Child | 13073604 | US | |
Parent | 09882438 | Jun 2001 | US |
Child | 12200666 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 09774272 | Jan 2001 | US |
Child | 09882438 | US |