This application is the US National Stage of International Application No. PCT/EP2013/055187 filed Mar. 14, 2013, and claims the benefit thereof. The International Application claims the benefit of German Application No. DE 102012204170.2 filed Mar. 16, 2012. All of the applications are incorporated by reference herein in their entirety.
The invention relates to a storage structure of an electrical energy storage cell.
Excess electrical power originating, for example, from renewable energy sources can be stored in the power grid only to a limited degree. This also applies to excess power which is obtained in fossil power plants when they are running within the optimal economic load range but the power is not being demanded by the consumer from the grid. There are various large-scale storage devices for intermediate storage of this excess power in relatively large amounts. One of these is, for example, a pumped storage power plant. In the battery sector, one approach for electrical energy storage means is to use rechargeable oxide batteries (ROB), i.e. high-temperature metal/air batteries. In these batteries, a metal-based storage medium is reduced or oxidized according to the state of the battery (charging or discharging). In the course of a multitude of these cyclical charging and discharging operations, i.e. oxidation and reduction operations, of the storage medium, there is a tendency in this medium, at the comparatively high operating temperatures to which such a battery is subjected, which are typically between 600° C. and 800° C., for the required microstructure, especially the pore structure of the storage medium, to be destroyed by sintering processes. This leads to aging and subsequently to failure of the battery.
It is an object of the invention to provide a storage cell of an electrical energy storage means, which has a higher long-term stability compared to the prior art and withstands a higher number of cycles of charging and discharging operations.
The solution to the problem is a storage structure having the features of the claims.
The inventive storage structure of an electrical energy storage cell comprises an active storage material and has the feature that the active storage material has a particle size distribution having a d5 of at least 0.1 μm and a d50 between 0.1 μm and 1.5 μm. In addition, it is a feature of the storage structure that a d95 of the particle size distribution is less than 10 μm. In this context, the term d50 is understood to mean that 50% of all the particles are smaller than the stated value. Analogously, the d5 means that 5% of the particles are smaller than the stated 0.1 μm, and the d95 means that 95% of all the particles are smaller than the stated value of 10 μm.
This particle size distribution is the particle size distribution of the starting materials of the active storage material for the storage structure. In the finished storage structure, the individual grains of the active storage material are in compressed or pre-sintered form, such that, at the microscopic level, there is formation of agglomerates or of cohesive connections in contact regions which are also referred to as sinter necks. The individual grains can thus, as a result of a thermal treatment, fuse at the contact regions through diffusion processes, the effect of which is that they become microscopically visible as a larger grain. Therefore, for physical characterization of the active storage material, the particle size distribution of the starting material is used, and this particle size distribution reflects, albeit with cohesive contact areas in the microstructure of the finished storage material or of the finished storage structure.
In an advantageous configuration of the invention, the particle size distribution of the starting material of the active storage material is characterized in such a way that a d5 is less than 0.2 μm, the d50 of the particle size distribution is between 0.3 μm and 1, 1.5 μm, and the d95 is less than 3 μm.
Each of the embodiments claimed involves a comparatively narrow particle size distribution, and the d50 with an order of magnitude around about 1 μm, i.e. between 0.8 μm and 1.1 μm, constitutes a range which is small enough, such that the particles have a very large surface area based on the volume thereof, the effect of which is in turn that the reactivity thereof with a reactant still to be elucidated is sufficiently high. Secondly, this d50 is selected at a sufficiently high level that there is not necessarily immediate sintering when the storage structure is operated at process temperatures of the energy storage cell between 600° C. and 800° C. This would occur for a particle size distribution if a d50 were to lie close to the nanometer range. It has thus been found in accordance with the invention that specifically a d50 around the region of 1 μm is particularly advantageous; in addition, the entire particle size distribution has to be very narrow, and therefore the d5 must not be smaller than 0.1 μm or, in an even more advantageous configuration of the invention, not smaller than 0.2 μm. This means that 95% of the grains of the active storage material used are larger than 0.2 μm but also smaller than 3 μm or 10 μm.
Such a narrow distribution structure of the particles of the active storage material with the given d50 thus has the effect that the particles are large enough that they do not have a tendency to elevated sintering, like the nanoparticles; secondly, the mean value of the particles is sufficiently small that the active surface area of the individual grains of the active storage material is sufficiently high that the corresponding chemical processes, especially redox processes, proceed very rapidly, which advantageously shortens the cycle times of the energy storage cell and increases the performance of the storage cell. In addition, any adverse effects that are caused by raw material or process contamination can be minimized by the high active surface area of the grains of the active storage material.
For even better stabilization of the storage structure against sintering over several cycles of a chemical process in the storage cell, especially of the redox process, it is appropriate also to introduce an inert material in divided form into the raw materials of the active storage material, in which case this inner material is present in the storage structure in finely divided form between the grains of the active storage material. Such an inert material likewise has a maximum grain size of 10 μm, especially of 3 μm. Such an inert material acts as a support structure which additionally further reduces the sintering tendency of the storage material. The proportion by volume of the inert material in the storage material here is advantageously less than 50%, especially between 5% and 15%.
In this context, the term “inert” is understood to mean that a chemical equilibrium between the inert material and a possible reactant is set to be sufficiently slow that, at the prevailing operating temperatures, there are no reactions that have a lasting effect on the functionality of the storage structure. This is especially understood to mean inert behavior toward a gaseous or liquid reactant which in turn enters into a reaction with the storage material. Moreover, this is understood to mean inert behavior with respect to the storage material per se. More particularly, useful inert storage materials are zirconium oxide, calcium oxide, magnesium oxide or aluminum oxide.
An open porosity of the storage structure, i.e. the empty volume between the grains of the active storage material and of any inert material, is between 15% and 30% by volume.
On the one hand, an open porosity in this order of magnitude is small enough that a maximum amount of active storage material can be accommodated per unit volume; on the other hand, it is large enough that a gaseous reactant can be transported to the active storage material at a sufficiently high speed.
The shape of the grains of the active storage material is advantageously aspherical. In this context, the grains may preferably be in oblate, prolate, platelet-shaped, acicular or tubular form, because such an aspherical, i.e. non-ball-shaped, particle morphology increases the surface to volume ratio of the particles.
In a preferred embodiment of the invention, the active storage material is in the form of iron oxide. In the course of production of the storage structure, the iron oxide is typically in the form of Fe2O3 (iron(III) oxide); during the operation of the storage cell, the oxidation states of the iron generally change, while the operation of the storage cell takes place with the compounds FeO (iron(II) oxide) and/or Fe3O4 (iron(II, III) oxide). The active storage material is especially in the form of a redox pair consisting of iron and iron oxide, the proportion of the respective components being dependent on the charge state of the electrical storage cell.
Further features of the invention and further advantages are elucidated in detail with reference to the figures which follow. The description of the figures comprises illustrative configurations of the invention which do not constitute a restriction of the scope of protection.
The figures show:
With reference to
For this reason, it is appropriate to use a storage structure 2 made from porous material on the negative electrode as energy storage medium, the latter containing a functionally active oxidizable material as an active storage material 6, preferably in the form of iron and iron oxide.
By means of a redox pair which is gaseous in the operating state of the battery, for example H2/H2O, the oxygen ions transported through the solid-state electrolyte 25 are transported through pore channels 17 in the porous storage structure 2 comprising the active storage material 6. According to whether a charging or discharging operation is in progress, the metal or the metal oxide (iron/iron oxide) is being oxidized or reduced and the oxygen required for that purpose is being supplied by the gaseous redox pair H2/H2O or is being transported back to the solid-state electrolyte. This mechanism is also referred to as the shuttle mechanism.
The advantage of iron as oxidizable material, i.e. as active storage material 6, is that it has about the same open-circuit voltage of about 1 V in its oxidation process as the redox pair H2/H2O.
Especially the diffusion of the oxygen ions through the solid-state electrolyte 23 requires a high operating temperature of 600 to 800° C. in the ROB described. In this context, not only the structure of the electrodes 21 and 24 and of the electrolyte 23 is subject to a high thermal stress, but also the storage structure 2 comprising the active storage material 6. In the constant cycles of oxidation and reduction, the active storage material has a tendency to sinter, meaning that the individual grains fuse together to an ever greater extent, until the reactive surface area becomes very small and the pore structure is closed. In the event of a closed pore structure, the redox pair H2/H2O can no longer reach the active surface of the active storage material 6, and so the capacity of the battery is very rapidly exhausted.
One advantage of the ROB is that it can be extended in a virtually unlimited modular manner by virtue of its smallest unit, namely the storage cell. Thus, a small battery for stationary domestic use can be executed, as can an industrial scale system for storage of the energy from a power plant.
A particle size distribution 19, 20 (cf.
In addition, the grains should not be too large; preferably not more than 5% of the particles should be larger than 3 μm. Particles in the order of magnitude around 1 μm have the particular advantage, for use as active storage material 6, of having a sufficiently high surface to volume ratio which ensures a good reaction with the reactants H2/H2O. The surface to volume ratio would of course be better in the case of particles in the nanometer range, but these would sinter immediately with one another to form large grains, which would in turn have a lasting effect on, or entirely prevent, gas permeability and would subsequently lead to stoppage of the reactivity of the active storage material with the reactant from the redox pair H2/H2O. The operability of the storage cell 4 would thus be terminated.
In the storage structure according to
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2012 204 170 | Mar 2012 | DE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2013/055187 | 3/14/2013 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2013/135790 | 9/19/2013 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4109060 | Andersson | Aug 1978 | A |
6103393 | Kodas et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6686093 | Sakai et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6967183 | Hampden-Smith et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7138159 | Hampden-Smith et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7211345 | Hampden-Smith et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7507687 | Hampden-Smith et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7563537 | Pratt | Jul 2009 | B2 |
20020107140 | Hampden-Smith et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20030064265 | Hampden-Smith et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030099882 | Atanassova Paolina et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030118884 | Hampden-Smith et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030130114 | Hampden-Smith et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20040072683 | Hampden-Smith et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20070122709 | Pratt et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20080113257 | Hampden-Smith et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20090202876 | Shimamura et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20110007617 | Tachino et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1355941 | Jun 2002 | CN |
102012215929 | Mar 2013 | DE |
H09894 | Jan 1997 | JP |
2003528419 | Sep 2003 | JP |
2004507341 | Mar 2004 | JP |
2005026143 | Jan 2005 | JP |
2006142275 | Jun 2006 | JP |
2011018388 | Jan 2011 | JP |
2011253675 | Dec 2011 | JP |
0193999 | Dec 2001 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Akisuke et al; “Synthesis of nano-Fe3O4-loaded tubular carbon nanofibers and their application as negative electrodes for Fe/air batteries”; Journal of Power Sources, Elsevier SA; Bd. 196, nr. 19; pp. 8154-8159; ISSN: 0378-7753, DOI 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.05.043; May 6, 2011. |
Kannan et al; “Rechargeable iron/air cells employing bifunctional oxygen electrodes of oxide pyrochlores”; Journal of Power Sources, Elsevier SA; Bd. 35, Nr. 2; pp. 113-121; ISSN: 0378-7753, DOI 10.1016/0378-7753(91)80028-V, XP000233205; Jul. 1, 1991. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150140454 A1 | May 2015 | US |