The invention generally pertains to storage tanks and more particularly to storage tanks for fluids including liquids and gases.
Industrial storage tanks used to contain liquids or compressed gases are common and are vital to industry. Storage tanks may be used to temporarily or permanently store fluids at an on-site location or may be used to transport the fluids over land or sea. Numerous inventions in the structural configurations of fluid storage tanks have been made over the years. One example of a non-conventional fluid storage tank having a cube-shaped configuration and support structure is found in U.S. Pat. No. 3,944,106 to Thomas Lamb, the entire contents of the patent are incorporated herein by reference.
There has been a progressive demand for the efficient storage and long distance transportation of fluids such as liquid natural gas (LNG), particularly over seas by large ocean-going tankers or carriers. In an effort to transport fluid such as LNG more economically, the holding or storage capacity of such LNG carriers has increased significantly from about 26,000 cubic meters in 1965 to over 200,000 cubic meters in 2005. Naturally, the length, beam and draft of these super carriers have also increased to accommodate the larger cargo capacity. The ability to further increase the size of these super carriers, however, has practical limits in the manufacture and use.
Difficulties have been experienced in the storage and transportation of fluids, particularly in a liquid form, through transportation by ocean carriers. A trend for large LNG carriers has been to use large side-to-side membrane-type tanks and insulation box supported-type tanks. As the volume of the tank transported fluid increases, the hydrostatic and dynamic loads on the tank containment walls increase significantly. These membrane and insulation type of tanks suffer from disadvantages of managing the “sloshing” movement of the liquid in the tank due to the natural movement of the carrier through the sea. As a result, the effective holding capacity of these types of tanks has been limited to either over 80% full or less than 10% full to avoid damage to the tank lining and insulation. The disadvantages and limitations of these tanks are expected to increase as the size of carriers increase.
The prior U.S. Pat. No. 3,944,106 tank was evaluated for containment of LNG in large capacities, for example, in large LNG ocean carriers against a similar sized geometric cube tank. It was determined that the '106 tank was more rigid using one third the wall thickness of the geometric cube. The '106 tank further significantly reduced the velocity of the fluid, reduced the energy transmitted to the tank and reduced the forces transmitted by the fluid to the tank causing substantially less deformation of the tank compared to the geometric cubic tank.
It was further determined, however, that the '106 configured tank did not prove suitable to handle large capacities of LNG in a large LNG carrier environment.
A further need has developed for the efficient storage and transportation of compressed natural gas (CNG) over land and sea. This includes carriers as well as Floating Oil/CNG Processing and Storage Offshore Platforms (FOCNGPSO) and floating CNG Processing and Storage Offshore Platforms (FCNGPSO). Several systems have been developed including the EnerSea Transport LLC's VOTRANS (a trademark of EnerSea) system which includes thousands of vertical or horizontal pipes which are individually filled with CNG and arranged in modules, for example on an ocean tanker. Another example is a system by SEA NG Company which involves miles of continuous piping oriented in a horizontal coil or reel called a COSELLE (a trademark of SEA NG). These self-contained coselles can be stacked vertically on one another and positioned in a tanker storage hold.
These CNG systems suffer from several disadvantages in managing the high pressure that CNG is typically stored at which can range from 2000-4000 pounds per square inch (psi) and at temperatures between around 0 and minus 30 degrees Centigrade (−30° C.). Some of these disadvantages of prior CNG storage systems include complexity in the storage tanks or systems themselves as well as significant requirements in the carrying vessel's length, beam, tonnage, propulsion, fuel consumption and the number of storage tank manifolds needed to maintain the desired temperature and pressure of the stored CNG.
Therefore, it would be advantageous to design and fabricate storage tanks for the efficient storage and transportation of large quantities of fluids such as LNG or CNG across land or sea. It is further desirable to provide a storage tank that is capable of being fabricated in ship yards for large tankers that further minimizes the number of components and minimizes the different gages or thickness of materials that are needed for the tank. It is further advantageous to provide a modular-type tank design which facilitates design, fabrication and use in the field.
Disclosed herein are embodiments of a large volume natural gas storage tank. In one aspect, a large volume natural gas storage tank comprises a plurality of rigid tubular walls each having opposing ends and an intermediate segment with a closed tubular cross-section, the plurality of rigid tubular walls arranged in a closely spaced relationship and interconnected at their ends, with each end of a given of the plurality of rigid tubular walls connected with respective ends of two others of the plurality of rigid tubular walls to define a corner of the storage tank, such that the interiors of the plurality of rigid tubular walls define an interior fluid storage chamber.
In another aspect, a large volume natural gas storage tank comprises a plurality of rigid tubular walls each having opposing ends and an intermediate segment with a closed tubular cross-section, the plurality of rigid tubular walls arranged in a closely spaced relationship and interconnected at their ends to form a six-sided storage tank, with each of the six sides of the storage tank defined by four successive of the plurality of rigid tubular walls connected end-to-end, such that the interiors of the plurality of rigid tubular walls define an interior fluid storage chamber.
These and other aspects will be described in additional detail below. Other applications of the present invention will become apparent to those skilled in the art when the following description of the best mode contemplated for practicing the invention is read in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.
The description herein makes reference to the accompanying drawings wherein like reference numerals refer to like parts throughout the several views, and wherein:
Several examples of the storage tank containment system in exemplary uses are shown in
As best seen in
In one preferred example shown in
Referring to
Referring to
Internal cross brace 84, and more particularly the four ends 116 on the first side brace 112 and second side brace 114 are connected to cylindrical walls 30 at the side openings 64 on each of the four sides, and top and bottom as best seen in
In a preferred example of materials for exemplary tank 10 shown in
In an exemplary design as generally shown in
In a preferred alternate example of tank 10, as best seen in FIGS. 2 and 6-13, alternate tank 10 design includes an alternate cross brace 122 and side reinforcements 162. This alternate design discloses exemplary ways for increasing the stress capabilities of the tank and connecting the internal cross brace to an exemplary carrier hull structure. Referring to
In the preferred example, each of the first 137 and second 138 braces include top and bottom plate 140 and an inner wall 142 as generally shown. Inner wall 142 may form two separate inner walls as shown.
In a preferred example, each of the first 137 and second 138 braces may include an extension 150 extending axially outward from inner wall 142 along second 118 and third 120 axes. Extensions 150 may each include a pair of side walls 154 and top and bottom plates 155 extending axially outward from inner wall 142 terminating at ends 158. As shown in
In a preferred examples shown in
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
The tank 10 may be filled with, for example, LNG to a capacity of about 95 percent of the internal storage chamber 66. As shown in the chart below, the volumetric efficiency of a tank 10 design (the CDTS) is compared with prior tank designs and a proposed PRISM membrane tank system (Nobel 2005). Comparing the tanks to a solid cube of 49,108 cubic meters, the respective volumes and efficiencies are shown.
The table shows that the tank 10 (CDTS) is 60% more efficient than a comparable spherical tank and an improvement over the PRISM tank design.
Further, use of a large marine carrier or ship cargo space was also compared. The below table shows the cargo hold space required by each of the below tank designs compared for a 138,000 and 400,000 cubic meter carrier. The numbers in parentheses show the percentage comparison with a membrane tank-type lining system.
The table shows that there are significant size reductions and an increase in percentage of use attainable in a large marine carrier using tank 10 over certain tank systems.
In a preferred example and method of fabrication, the respective components of alternate tank 10 shown in
The tank 10 includes numerous other advantages over prior tanks Exemplary advantages of tank 10 include: flexibility on the amount of fluid contained ranging from about 5 to about 95 percent of the tank capacity; there is no need to stage the cargo hold to apply insulation and lining to the cargo hold; there is no need for significant welding of the insulation and lining securing strips and the lining onboard a ship; the tank 10 can be installed in one piece at the most efficient time in the ship production process; tank 10 can be constructed of different materials and is modular in design; tank 10 can be produced at many ship and transportation vehicle build sites using conventional tools; tank 10 can be leak tested before installation in a ship or transportation vehicle; tank 10 is not subject to the level of damage from dropped items as compared to membrane tank containment systems and tank 10 requires a smaller base support “foot print” compared to spherical tanks circumferential skirts. Other advantages known by those skilled in the art may be achieved.
Examples of an alternate storage tank system for exemplary use with compressed natural gas (CNG) are illustrated in
As best seen in
As best seen in
Referring to
As best seen in
In examples of the alternate tank 300, the following Table 3 shows several variations for different tank sizes and the approximate thicknesses of the walls/shell.
Although particular sizes of tank 300 are described in the above table, different sizes of tanks with commensurate differences in interior capacity, known by those skilled in the art, may be used. Referring to the example shown in
In an example of material used to construct the shell of alternate tank 300, high strength, pressure grade steel is used. Other materials and in different thicknesses than those listed in the above table known by those skilled in the art may be used without deviating from the present invention. It is also understood that different components other than those described above and illustrated, as well as in different shapes and orientations, known by those skilled in the art may be used. In preferred example, the above described components are rigidly and continuously seam welded together using known methods to permanently and hermetically seal the components together in a manner to completely contain CNG in the internal chamber 66.
As best seen in
In alternate examples shown in
Referring to
In an alternate example to reinforcement corners 320, a plurality of gusset plates 421 can be used to further connect bulkhead 330 to adjacent cylinders and end caps as opposed to ring 399.
Referring to
Referring to
In an alternate example of tank 300 shown in
In an application of tank 300 to store CNG for transportation on a ocean tanker, it is contemplated that only a few tanks 300, for example four, could be positioned and secured in cargo holds to store between 1.1 to 1.6 MM scm (millions of standard cubic meters). In larger or super tankers, it is contemplated that between 90 and 108 tanks 300, positioned on separate vertical decks of a ship as generally shown in
Through analytical testing of the present invention against the prior VOTRANS and SEA NG designs, the following data was developed.
From the data and other advantages of the invention for exemplary use for carriage of CNG in ships and floating production and storage platforms, the present CDTS invention provides benefits of: significant reduction in the required size of tankers (length, displacement and vessel power plant requirements); a significant increase in the ship volumetric efficiency and hold volumetric efficiency; a reduction in the estimated costs of carriers of between 5% and 20%; a reduction in the gross tonnage and therefore many operating costs by 15% to 60%; a significant reduction in surface area and thus heat transfer by a factor of 8 compared to the prior VOTRANS system and a factor of 50 compared to SEA NG system. Other advantages and efficiencies known by those skilled in the art are achievable.
While the invention has been described in connection with what is presently considered to be the most practical and preferred embodiment, it is to be understood that the invention is not to be limited to the disclosed embodiments but, on the contrary, is intended to cover various modifications and equivalent arrangements included within the spirit and scope of the appended claims, which scope is to be accorded the broadest interpretation so as to encompass all such modifications and equivalent structures as is permitted under the law.
This continuation application claims priority benefit to U.S. utility patent application Ser. No. 13/660,460 filed Oct. 25, 2012, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,851,320, which is a continuation application claiming priority benefit to U.S. utility patent application Ser. No. 12/823,719 filed Jun. 25, 2010, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,322,551, which is a continuation-in-part application claiming priority benefit to U.S. utility patent application Ser. No. 11/923,787 filed Oct. 25, 2007, now abandoned, which claims priority benefit to U.S. provisional patent application Ser. No. 60/854,593 filed Oct. 26, 2006, all of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entireties.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1769831 | Gramm et al. | Jul 1930 | A |
2675940 | Ewald et al. | Apr 1954 | A |
3124265 | Bertels | Mar 1964 | A |
3314567 | Becker et al. | Apr 1967 | A |
3414153 | Leroux et al. | Dec 1968 | A |
3944106 | Lamb | Mar 1976 | A |
4459929 | Ffooks | Jul 1984 | A |
4838449 | Jarnott et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
4946056 | Stannard | Aug 1990 | A |
4947998 | Smeller | Aug 1990 | A |
5462505 | Blair et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5624049 | Kovash et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
6659303 | Garceau | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6691889 | Falk | Feb 2004 | B1 |
8020722 | Richards et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8322551 | Ramoo et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8851320 | Ramoo et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
20010040160 | Gulati | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20080209918 | White | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20100083671 | Liner | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20110121003 | Moir | May 2011 | A1 |
20150021341 | Ramoo et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
WO2006001711 | Jan 2006 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Written Opinion and Search Report dated Mar. 26, 2013 from related PCT/US2010/066073 filed Nov. 20, 2012. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150021318 A1 | Jan 2015 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60854593 | Oct 2006 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13660460 | Oct 2012 | US |
Child | 14506903 | US | |
Parent | 12823719 | Jun 2010 | US |
Child | 13660460 | US | |
Parent | 11923787 | Oct 2007 | US |
Child | 12823719 | US |