None.
1. Field of the Invention
The present invention is directed generally to tanks used for storing liquids such as water and, more particularly, to large storage tanks, usually concrete tanks, having some sort of structure for eliminating or at least minimizing lateral or rotational movement of the tank when the same is subjected to lateral forces, such as may occur during backfilling and/or earthquakes and the like.
2. The Prior Art Background
As a brief background, storage tanks, including conventional prestressed composite concrete tanks, may generally comprise a floor slab and an upright annular wall that sits on the floor slab. The floor slab desirably lies on a level ground surface (subgrade). Conventionally, the wall, with respect to the floor slab, may be either monolithic or free sliding. Generally speaking, monolithic tanks may be more cost effective than tanks where the tank wall and the floor slab are free sliding. The latter is particularly true in connection with smaller tanks.
As the name implies, where a monolithic design is used, the floor slab and the walls of the tank are constructed with reinforcing steel passing through the joint and developed into both the floor slab and the wall. This reinforcing steel effectively ties the two pieces of the tank, the floor slab and the wall, together so that they act as one. Moments are transferred into the wall due to loads placed on the floor slab and vice-versa. When designing the tank, these moments may be calculated using an engineering theory known as moment distribution. Using moment distribution a certain percentage of the moment in the wall is distributed to the floor slab. This distribution is based on the relative stiffnesses of the floor and wall segments.
Necessarily storage tanks may often be subjected to significant horizontal lateral forces. Such forces may occur, for example, during the backfilling of the tank. To be more specific, in many instances the terrain where a tank is to be constructed is not level but is instead sloped, e.g., on the side of a hill. Prior to construction of the tank, earth may be excavated from the hillside to provide a level base for the tank. Once the tank is completed, earth is replaced, particularly along the uphill side of the wall structure of the tank, to restore natural grades. Backfilling on only a portion of the wall structure, or unequal backfilling on opposite sides of the tank, however, may create lateral forces which tend to displace the tank off the excavated ground surface in the downhill direction, or at least tend to cause the structure to slide laterally across the level ground surface. Another example of the occurrence of such forces is during an earthquake or earth tremor where unequal lateral forces tending to displace the tank may be imposed on the walls of the tank from any direction.
Expanding on the foregoing, when a tank is backfilled differentially, that is to say, the backfill is higher on one side of the tank than the other, sliding can be induced on the tank structure by the load resulting from the backfill if the friction between the floor slab and the subgrade is overcome. In the past, when differential backfill presented a potential problem, it was conventional to use a tank design where a slab projecting outwardly from the tank near its base on the uphill side of the tank was employed. This provided additional surface area and thus additional frictional forces to resist the lateral forces resulting from differential backfill loading. Such a projecting slab was known as a shear pad.
The prior use of such shear pads did not come without additional cost, particularly where a monolithic design was to be used for the tanks. That is to say, such a projecting slab loaded with soil backfill on the outer side of the wall, particularly where the tank had a monolithic wall/floor joint, served to stiffen the joint resulting in a greater moment being distributed to the tank wall. This necessitated a thicker wall with more reinforcing steel and potentially resulted in an uncompetitive design. The most economical way then to build a differentially backfilled tank where a shear pad was desired was to use a joint design where the floor and the wall were not monolithic. The shear pad became a simple extension of the floor radially outwardly beyond the wall. Again the shortcoming was a tank that was more expensive.
The prior art problems discussed above are addressed, if not minimized, by the invention described and claimed herein. That is to say, the invention described and claimed in the present specification provides an economical storage tank having an efficient shear pad that resists the forces imposed when the tank is backfilled differentially. In accordance with the concepts and principles of the invention, the shear pad is flexibly attached to the tank in such a way that any forces imposed on the wall of the tank are minimized. In this regard the shear pad is attached to the tank wall in a “flexible” manner such that when the shear pad is loaded there will be no substantial transfer of moments from the shear pad to the wall sufficient to alter the calculated moments required for the tank wall assuming the tank were to be constructed for use in an application where differential backfill is not required.
In accordance with the concepts and principles of the invention, a storage tank structure is provided that comprises a tank including a floor slab having a periphery and a wall having inner and outer faces that extends upwardly from the floor slab at a position adjacent the periphery. The tank structure also includes a shear pad that extends outwardly away from the tank from a position adjacent a lower portion of the outer face of the wall and flexible structure extending between the tank and the shear pad permitting the latter to move relative to the tank during lateral and/or vertical shifting of the tank. Desirably, the wall of the tank may be cylindrical. In addition to the foregoing, it is preferred that the tank and the shear pad may each be constructed of concrete and that the flexible connecting element may have one end embedded in the shear pad and an opposite end embedded in the tank.
Preferably the shear pad and the tank are positioned relative to one another in such a way that a space is provided therebetween. Moreover it is preferred that the flexible structure includes a plurality of elongated flexible connecting elements extending through the space in interconnecting relationship relative to the shear pad and the tank. Desirably the wall and the floor slab are monolithic and the shear pad and said floor slab are generally coplanar.
It is also preferred, in accordance with the invention, that a resilient elastomeric material may be disposed in the space and that the flexible connecting elements are located so as to extend through the elastomeric material. Even more preferably, the flexible connecting elements may comprise steel cables and may be provided with a corrosion resistant coating.
In accordance with another aspect of the invention, the same provides a method for construction of a storage tank structure with that is resistant to sliding. In further accordance with this aspect of the invention, the method may comprise erecting a tank including a floor slab having a periphery and a wall having inner and outer faces that extends upwardly from the floor slab at a position adjacent said periphery. In further accordance with this aspect of the invention, the method may include forming a shear pad and positioning the same so as to extend outwardly away from said tank from a position adjacent a lower portion of the outer face of said wall and so as to provide a space between the shear pad and the tank. Ideally, and in further accordance with the invention, the tank wall may be cylindrical, the floor slab may be formed monolithically and the shear pad and said floor slab may be generally coplanar.
In accordance with this latter aspect of the invention, an elongated flexible connecting element may be supplied and arranged so as to extend through the space in interconnecting relationship relative to the shear pad and the tank. Desirably the tank structure may be constructed in such a way that a resilient elastomeric material is disposed in the space with the flexible connecting element extending through said elastomeric material. Ideally there may be a plurality of flexible connecting elements and the same may comprise steel cables and may be provided with a corrosion resistant coating.
In further accordance with the invention, the method for construction of a storage tank structure which is resistant to sliding may include constructing the tank and the shear pad of concrete and embedding one end of the flexible connecting element in the shear pad and embedding an opposite end thereof in said tank.
A storage tank structure 10 that embodies the concepts and principles of the invention is illustrated in
Desirably, in accordance with one preferred embodiment of the invention, tank 12 may be of a conventional design of the sort illustrated in U.S. Pat. No. 5,150,551 (the “'551 patent”). That is to say, tank 12 may be a prestressed composite concrete tank. Such tanks are also illustrated broadly in U.S. Pat. No. 2,370,780 (the “'780 patent”) and in U.S. Pat. No. 3,822,520 (the “'520 patent”). The entireties of the disclosures of the '551 patent, the '780 patent and the '520 patent are incorporated herein by this specific reference thereto.
As shown, shear pad 14 may be positioned on the uphill side of tank 12, and the same may extend outwardly away from a position 26 adjacent a lower portion 28 of outer face 22 of tank 12. As discussed above, and again with reference to
With reference to
Preferably, the inner arcuate surface 34 of shear pad 14 may be located in spaced relationship relative to outer face 22 of tank 12 so as to present a circumferentially extending arcuate space 36 therebetween. Desirably, a circumferentially elongated strip 38 of a resilient elastomeric material, which ideally may comprise neoprene, may be arranged in space 36. In this latter regard, strip 38 and space 36 may preferably be co-extensive in circumferential length such that the entire extent of space 36 is filled with the resilient elastomeric material. Desirably space 36 may have a width (between tank 12 and pad 14) of from 1 to 1.5 inches, and ideally the width may be 1 inch. Whatever the case, the width of the space 36 simply needs to be sufficient to minimize the possibility of physical contact between the tank 12 and the pad 14 that might otherwise interfere with the ability of the latter to flex relative to the tank 12. Preferably the width of strip 38 should be essentially the same as the width of space 36. In this latter regard, the principle purpose of strip 38 is to fill space 36 and flex sufficiently during use so as to remain in place in space 36.
In further accordance with the invention, tank structure 10 may preferably include a plurality of elongated flexible connecting elements 40, which desirably may be comprised of steel cables 42. A preferred arrangement of the cables 42 is illustrated schematically in
As shown in
As can be seen from
As is known to those of ordinary skill in the storage tank field, the tank structure 10 may include a conventional French drain 50 and a conventional geocomposite drain 52 wrapped around the exterior thereof. Also, the tank 12 and the shear pad 14 may each include conventional reinforcing steel in the nature of wire bar supports 54 and bars 56.
In a useful embodiment of the tank structure 10 of the invention, the tank 12 may be circular and have an inside diameter of approximately 50 feet, 6 inches. The height of wall 20 may simply be sufficient to accommodate the design capacity of the tank 12 for holding a liquid. With such a tank structure, the shear pad 14 may have a vertical dimension of about 5 inches, a radial (relative to the tank 12) dimension of about 2 feet, and a circumferential extension around the base of the tank 12 of about 90 degrees. The orientation of the shear pad 14 should ideally be such that the center point of the same is disposed beneath the high point of the backfill.
For the preferred embodiment described above, the cables 42 may be 0.5 inches in diameter and approximately 6 feet 6 inches long. Desirably the cables 42 may be 270 KSI 7-wire strand epoxy coated Flo-Bond restraint cables and the same may be spaced apart at intervals of about 5 inches. The cables 42 may be arranged such that the portions thereof that are embedded in the shear pad 14 may extend to within about 2 inches of the outer edge of the pad. Moreover, the strip 38 may ideally be 1 inch thick by 5 inches wide, and the same may desirably be formed from R-423-N Neoprene.
The invention also includes a method for construction of a storage tank structure 10 with sliding resistance. Such method includes erecting a tank 12 including a floor slab 16 having a periphery 18 and a wall 20 having inner and outer faces 24, 22 extending upwardly from floor slab 16 at a position thereon adjacent periphery 18. Contemporaneously, a shear pad 14 is formed in a position to extend outwardly away from tank 12 from a position 26 adjacent a lower portion 28 of outer face 22 of wall 20. The pad 14 is positioned so as to provide a space 36 between the shear pad 14 and the tank 12. A plurality of elongated flexible connecting elements 40 are supplied and arranged so as to extend through space 36 in interconnecting relationship relative to shear pad 14 and tank 12.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1301155 | Mueser | Apr 1919 | A |
2289913 | Joor, Jr. | Jul 1942 | A |
2370780 | Crom | Mar 1945 | A |
3233376 | Naillon et al. | Feb 1966 | A |
3538661 | Nelson | Nov 1970 | A |
3822520 | Crom, Jr. | Jul 1974 | A |
3927497 | Yoshinaga et al. | Dec 1975 | A |
4041722 | Terlesky et al. | Aug 1977 | A |
4068777 | Humphrey et al. | Jan 1978 | A |
4069642 | Hendriks | Jan 1978 | A |
4074485 | Hendriks | Feb 1978 | A |
RE29777 | Crowley | Sep 1978 | E |
4271647 | Balck, Jr. | Jun 1981 | A |
4344264 | Smith | Aug 1982 | A |
4366654 | Bomhard | Jan 1983 | A |
4776145 | Dykmans | Oct 1988 | A |
5094044 | Dykmans | Mar 1992 | A |
5150551 | Crom et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5675941 | Dykmans | Oct 1997 | A |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100294778 A1 | Nov 2010 | US |