This application relates to the field of building systems and, more particularly, to dampers and valves in an air treatment system.
Building automation systems encompass a wide variety of systems that aid in the monitoring and control of various aspects of building operation. Building automation systems (which may also be referred to herein as “building control systems”) include security systems, fire safety systems, lighting systems, and heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (“HVAC”) systems. Many of those systems have valves that need to be in a set position if an emergency occurs, such as a fire. For example, air vents are typically in an open or partially open position during normal operation and need to be in a closed position if a fire occurs in order to prevent smoke and fumes being transported throughout the building. As the vents are often controlled by electrical motors and power may be unreliable in an emergency, the vents need to have a way to efficiently close.
What is needed in the art is an approach that enables vents to close efficiently using stored energy.
In accordance with one embodiment of the disclosure, an actuator (motor in the current example) is coupled to a switching regulator that uses a first power level to open a vent and a second lower power level to keep the vent open. The second power level having the advantage of saving energy and reducing wear on the motor and gear train associated with the vent. Energy is required to keep the vent open because it is biased to be in a closed position for safety reasons (i.e. the vent would close in the event of a fire where power to an actuator is lost).
The above described features and advantages, as well as others, will become more readily apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art by reference to the following detailed description and accompanying drawings. While it would be desirable to provide an approach for an actuator that reduces the wear and power consumption of the actuator during operation, one or more of these or other advantageous features, the teachings disclosed herein extend to those embodiments which fall within the scope of the appended claims, regardless of whether they accomplish one or more of the above-mentioned advantages.
In certain smoke control applications it would be advantageous to position an actuator (typically controlled by a motor) to control air flow and have it return to a closed position in the event of a fire or loss of power. This type of actuator would be termed “fail-safe.” An approach to store energy required to close the actuator (often a mechanical spring). An electrical motor provides the ability to position the actuator open and a biasing spring would provide the fail safe return. Upon loss of power the actuator returns to the closed position. But, while the motor is maintaining the actuator in the open position, power is being consumed. It is the objective of this approach to reduce the motor heating and gear train stress as well as power consumption. It is also advantageous to use a high frequency switcher in order to reduce ripple in order to also prevent damage to the gears over time.
In
The switching regulator 104 supplies constant voltage, or more precisely a two-step constant voltage, with one step being a “HI” 110 constant voltage and the other step being a “LOW” 112 constant voltage to the motor & gear train 102. The BUCK switching regulator 104 supplies a constant “HI” voltage 110 to the motor 102 and runs the motor 102 to its end of travel (i.e. vent or valve in the open position). With the motor at its end of travel or vent open position (the open position may be before the actual end of travel of the gear train), a biasing member, such as a spring on the vent may be extended or stretched. The “HI” constant voltage 110 supplied to the motor and gear train 102 is then switched to the “LOW” current limited constant voltage 112 in order to reduce torque at the end of travel to save energy and wear on the gear train.
Once at the end of travel, the first or “HI” constant voltage 110 to the motor 102 is reduced to a second or “Low” constant voltage 112 in order to provide a minimal force to hold the motor in the current position (vent open). In the present implementation, a timer may be used to indicate when to switch between the “HI” constant voltage 110 and the “Low” constant voltage 112 occurs. The timer may be set for a predetermined amount of time and that amount of time is associated with the time it takes for the DC motor and drive train 102 to oven the vent.
In other implementations, a sensor or switch may be used to signal or otherwise trigger 114 the end of travel and a switch from “HI” constant voltage 110 to the “Low” constant voltage 112. The reduction in constant voltage reduces the heating and gear train stress as well as the power consumption of the DC motor 102. In order to achieve these results, “clean” DC power with low voltage rippling is desirable as the “clean” DC power prevents gear and motor wear from “fretting” of the gear train.
The use of a high frequency switching regulator, such as a BUCK switching regulator is superior to other approaches because it provides “cleaner” power to the motor which reduces fretting as opposed to approaches that use rectifiers. A rectifier and filtered 50/60 Hz power source may have a high degree of ripple that is difficult to filter. This ripple if not addressed, results in “fretting corrosion” of the gears and may result in premature failure, which has actually occurred with traditional approaches.
The switching regulator 104 switches from “HI” constant voltage 110 to “LOW” constant voltage 112 in response to a sensor or timer depending upon the implementation. The switching regulator 104 is a two-step voltage supply. Because a BUCK switching regulator 104 is employed, a significant savings in power is achieved over traditional approaches. Furthermore, the BUCK switching regulator 104 has the ability to be powered from either 24V AC (50 or 60 Hz) or 24V DC and may operate over a wide input voltage range without the need for a transformer as used in prior art implementations. The reduction in voltage to the motor (DC motor 102 in the current example) minimizes gear train stress.
Turning to
In
Turning to
Unlike the previous implementation of
In
The foregoing detailed description of one or more embodiments of the stored energy for failsafe valve or damper approach has been presented herein by way of example only and not limitation. It will be recognized that there are advantages to certain individual features and functions described herein that may be obtained without incorporating other features and functions described herein. Moreover, it will be recognized that various alternatives, modifications, variations, or improvements of the above-disclosed embodiments and other features and functions, or alternatives thereof, may be desirably combined into many other different embodiments, systems or applications. Presently unforeseen or unanticipated alternatives, modifications, variations, or improvements therein may be subsequently made by those skilled in the art which are also intended to be encompassed by the appended claims. Therefore, the spirit and scope of any appended claims should not be limited to the description of the embodiments contained herein.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2015/021955 | 3/23/2015 | WO | 00 |