1. Field of the Invention
This invention relates to a storm panel to protect property against damage caused by high winds and impact from associated flying objects and debris that result from a hurricane or other occurrence.
2. Description of the Related Art
Various devices and materials have been proposed for the protection of building openings (such as windows, doors, and sliding glass doors) from the effects of high winds and flying objects associated with a hurricane or similar event. Some have even been utilized. In the simplest and most often utilized form, sheets of plywood have been nailed, screwed, or otherwise attached to a building as a covering for windows and doors. The user needs to acquire and cut plywood sheets to the proper dimensions to cover the openings and to install them. Because of their appearance, bulkiness and weight, plywood covers are typically installed only when a hurricane or similar incident is imminent. During the hurricane or other storm, the plywood prevents any light from entering into the building and electricity frequently gets interrupted during hurricanes. As a result, the covered windows and doors produce a cave-like effect that is uncomfortable and inconvenient to the building occupants. After the threat of damage has passed, the plywood sheets must be removed by hand. The securing system (nails, etc.) may cause damage to the building structure.
Another protective system is a plurality of corrugated steel, aluminum or other metal panels. These panels usually have holes provided in several locations along their periphery and are adapted to be positioned on anchor screws that have been secured to the building around the opening to be protected. Wing nuts are typically used to secure the metal panels to the screws and the panels are held in place by a combination of the screw-wing nut assembly and rails that at least partially surround the windows and doors. Like plywood, these panels are usually very heavy. They also need to be installed before a hurricane event and removed afterwards. Also, like the plywood system, these metal panels or “shutters” block out most of the outside light when they are installed in place. In addition, they must be stored in a place which prevents the panels from being readily obtained when needed. Thus, the metal shutters provide an unsightly and inconvenient, although effective, protection against the effects of a hurricane.
One system that provides light into a building while providing protection against hurricanes, uses heavy plastic, translucent, corrugated sheets, such as those formed of polycarbonate. These sheets are typically installed in a manner similar to the metal panels. They are also unsightly, heavy and cumbersome to install, must be removed, and require significant storage space. Combinations of metal and plastic panels have also been suggested in U.S. Pat. No. 6,615,555.
Another type of protective device is a flexible metal shutter that is formed from interconnected metal slats. These shutters may be manually or electrically operated and are permanent attachments to the building. They are adapted to be rolled up or opened laterally in an accordion-like manner. Although the structures offer acceptable protection, they likewise prevent very little light from penetrating when they are in their protective position. These systems also tend to be the most expensive. Since they are permanently installed they can detract from the aesthetics of the home.
Still another protective system is a coated fabric made from a plastic coated polyester material. The coated fabric is typically very thick to provide protection against wind and flying object damage. The fabric is also provided with grommets along its periphery. The coated polyester fabric is secured to the building usually with anchor screws that are attached to the building with wing nut fasteners. These fabrics are heavy and difficult to install, and are relatively bulky to store. They do not allow sufficient light to enter the building, after they are installed their strength and ability to protect are questionable and do not meet new codes, and they must be removed and stored when not in use.
Other fabric protective systems are disclosed, for example, in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,176,050; 6,263,949; 6,341,455; 6,851,464, and 6,886,300, as well as in U.S. Published Applications Nos. 2003/0079430; 2004/0154242; and 2004/0221534.
Thus, despite the existence of such storms for many, many years, and despite the existence of materials of many types, including high strength fabrics, no satisfactory solution has been found. Now surprisingly, a storm panel has been developed, that is lightweight, translucent, and, when constructed and installed in accordance with the teaching of the present invention, will effectively protect window and door openings from debris and airborne objects occurring during hurricane force winds, while allowing light into the building. “Effectively protect,” as used herein, means the product of the invention will comply with the 2004 Florida Building Code and the 2003 International Building Code as a large missile impact system.
In accordance with one aspect of the invention, a high strength fabric panel, of such size and shape as to extend across a selected door or window opening is provided with a hem along the top and bottom edge. A strip of reinforcing material (aluminum and the like) is inserted in each hem and a series of holes is placed through both the hem and reinforcing strip at strategically spaced positions along the hem. When used with the appropriate anchor screws, there is provided a reinforced anchoring device that securely holds the fabric panel in place during a storm.
According to another aspect, there is provided a high strength fabric panel having at least one access opening. In the case of elevated windows, the access opening thus permits the fabric panel to be attached easily to the anchors from the inside without the use of ladders. In the case of a door, this permits ingress and egress through the access opening with the fabric panel installed.
According to another aspect, there is provided a cover and c-shaped clips that cover the rolled up fabric panel and provide a system for attractively storing the panel adjacent the corresponding window or door when not in use.
According to another aspect, there is provided a cover and flexible closure straps with a closure material such as hook and latch material to secure and store the rolled up fabric panel when not in use.
According to yet another aspect, the fabric panel is formed of high strength yarns made from high strength, high tenacity (greater than 7 g/d) polymeric fibers, such as ultra high molecular weight polyethylene, ultra high molecular weight aramids, and ultra high molecular weight polypropylene.
Such a device, when properly installed with the reinforcing strips and anchored appropriately is able to protect the windows and doors once it is installed, from airborne debris and objects commonly associated with hurricanes.
Having described the invention in general terms, reference will now be made to the accompanying drawings, which are not necessarily drawn to scale, and wherein:
Turning now the drawings, a storm panel for windows, doors, sliding doors, and the like is illustrated in
As best illustrated in
The term “relatively high strength yarns” or “high strength fabric” as used herein, are yarns and/or fabrics sufficiently strong that, when constructed and attached as described herein, will pass the 2004 Florida Building Code and the 2003 International Building Code as a large missile impact system. Examples of high strength yarns and fabrics include those formed primarily of ultra high molecular weight polyethylene (such as SPECTRA® by Honeywell), ultra high molecular weight aramids, and ultra high molecular weight polypropylene, and those formed of blends of such compositions. Aramids are intended to include para-aramids such as KEVLAR® by Dupont. The term “translucent” means the fabric transmits at least 60% of the light striking its surface.
Optional aspects of the fabric panel 12 include additional side openings 26, so that the fabric panel can be fastened on the sides as well as at the top and bottom. Also, in the cases of a larger window opening, the fabric panel 12 may have to have one or more seams 28. Such a seam is best shown in
Referring now to
Formed in this manner, the opening 21 affords very little exposure to or through the opening 21 which aids in preventing any unwanted intrusion of water, or the potential of damage to the panel 10 during a storm.
Turning to
One suitable zipper type is a heavy-duty molded plastic zipper (resists corrosive effects of salt and seawater) such as the No. 15 Big Zip, available from Lenzip Manufacturing Corporation as Part No. 1540E. Alternatively, other closure materials or fasteners may be used, including but not limited to hook-and-loop, i.e., VELCRO® strip material, buttons, snaps, etc.
Referring now to
Turning now to
While the screw type anchors shown above are illustrative of the types of anchors that can be used, other types of anchoring means can also be used depending upon whether the structure is wood, concrete, concrete block, brick, stucco, etc., it being understood that the type of anchor should be selected depending upon the type material into which it must be inserted and secured. The process involves lining up the holes in the wall with the openings in the hem and reinforcing strip. The hole positions are marked on the wall, and then using a drill, drilling a hole into the wall an appropriate depth and diameter. The fabric panel 12 is then attached by securing the upper hem 14 to the portion of the wall above the wall opening, then securing the lower hem 16 to the area below the opening in the same manner. If the optional side openings are used, the sides are then secured in the same manner.
In
An attractive protective cover 40 of some suitable material such as a solution dyed acrylic fabric such as SUNBRELLA® by Glen Raven may optionally be provided. The protective cover 40, as illustrated in
While
Obviously, the fabric panel 12 could be similarly stored beneath the window, or in the case of windows, doors, or sliding glass doors, the fabric panel could possibly be attached on either side of the opening, then rolled and stored on one side or the other.
A flexible composite fabric was formed from a single ply fabric made of ultra high molecular weight, extended chain polyethylene fibers. The fibers were Spectra® 900, 650 denier yarn available from Honeywell International Inc. and had a tenacity of 30.5 g/d. The fabric was in the form of a plain weave woven fabric (style 904 made by Hexcel Reinforcements Corp.), characterized as having a weight of 6.3 oz/yd2 (0.02 g/cm2), 34×34 ends per inch (13.4×13.4 ends per cm), a yarn denier of 650 in both the warp and weft, and a thickness of 17 mils (425 μm). The fabric was laminated on both sides to a low density polyethylene film having a thickness of 1.5 mil (37.5 μm). A 4 mil (100 μm) film of ethylene vinyl acetate was used as a bonding layer between the fabric layer and the two polyethylene film layers. The layers were laminated together by a thermal lamination technique as described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,280,546 and 6,818,091. A No. 15 Big Zip, Part No. 1541E was installed in a horizontal slit in the fabric as illustrated in
The total composite fabric weight was 14.8 oz/yd2 (0.05 g/cm2), and the total composite fabric thickness was 0.030 inch (0.76 mm). The composite had a grab strength in the range of 850 to 950 pounds per inch (148.8 kN/m) of fabric width, as measured by ASTM 1682.
The percent transmitted light through this composite was found to be about 80% (test method based on ASTM D1746).
This fabric, when constructed into a storm panel and installed as described above, effectively protects the underlying opening.
A flexible composite fabric was formed from a single ply fabric made of extended chain polyethylene fibers. The fibers were Spectra® 900, 1200 denier yarn available from Honeywell International Inc. and had a tenacity of 30 g/d. The fabric was in the form of a basket weave woven fabric (style 912 made by Hexcel Reinforcements Corp.), characterized as having a weight of 11.3 oz/yd2 (0.044 g/cm2), 34×34 ends per inch (13.4×13.4 ends per cm), a yarn denier of 1200 in both the warp and weft, and a thickness of 28 mils (700 μm). The fabric was laminated on both sides to a low density polyethylene film having a thickness of about 2 mils (10 μm). A 7-8 mil (175-200 μm) film of ethylene vinyl acetate was used as a bonding layer between the fabric and the two polyethylene film layers. The layers were laminated together by a thermal lamination technique as described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,280,546 and 6,818,091. A No. 15 Big Zip, Part No. 1541E was installed in a vertical slit in the fabric as illustrated in
The total composite fabric weight was 20 oz/yd2 (0.07 g/cm2), and the total composite fabric thickness was 0.045 inch (1.14 mm). The composite had a grab strength in the range of 1700 to 1900 pounds per inch (298-333 kN/m) of fabric width, as measured by ASTM 1682.
This fabric, when constructed into a storm panel an installed as described above, also effectively protects the underlying opening.
The foregoing description is illustrative of a preferred embodiment of the present invention, however it is apparent that various changes may be made without departing from the scope of the invention. For example, as described above, the system may be utilized with various types of building structures which would require various types of anchoring systems. The storm panel may be attached to the vertical surface of a building, the window or door facings, or the horizontal undersurface of an opening facing. There may be utilized the optional grommeted side openings which provide further reinforcement of the panel. Various configurations of the zippered openings may be provided to conform to various window and door sizes and placements. Thus, various modifications and variations are possible. It is intended that the scope of the invention be limited not by the description of the preferred embodiments above, but rather by the following claims.
This is a continuation-in-part of application Ser. No. 11/767,753, filed Jun. 25, 2007, the content of which is hereby incorporated in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3616838 | Barr | Nov 1971 | A |
3715843 | Ballinger | Feb 1973 | A |
3805816 | Nolte | Apr 1974 | A |
3862876 | Graves | Jan 1975 | A |
3949527 | Double et al. | Apr 1976 | A |
4131150 | Papadakis | Dec 1978 | A |
4210191 | Li | Jul 1980 | A |
RE30664 | Upton et al. | Jul 1981 | E |
4283888 | Cros | Aug 1981 | A |
4397122 | Cros | Aug 1983 | A |
4457985 | Harpell et al. | Jul 1984 | A |
4590714 | Walker | May 1986 | A |
4858395 | McQuirk | Aug 1989 | A |
4932457 | Duncan | Jun 1990 | A |
4991522 | Alexander | Feb 1991 | A |
5347768 | Pineda | Sep 1994 | A |
5381846 | Lichy | Jan 1995 | A |
5479744 | Meyer | Jan 1996 | A |
5522184 | Oviedo-Reyes | Jun 1996 | A |
5540177 | Masters | Jul 1996 | A |
5791090 | Gitlin et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5915449 | Schwartz | Jun 1999 | A |
6176050 | Gower | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6263949 | Guthrie, Jr. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6280546 | Holland et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6296039 | Mullet et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6325085 | Gower | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6341455 | Gunn | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6412540 | Hendee | Jul 2002 | B2 |
6615555 | Madden | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6701948 | Jopp et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6755232 | Holland et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6810626 | Meyer et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6818091 | Holland et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6851464 | Hudoba et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6865852 | Gower | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6886299 | Gower | May 2005 | B2 |
6886300 | Hudoba et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6898907 | Diamond | May 2005 | B2 |
6959748 | Hudoba | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7210492 | Gerrie et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7464505 | Grenier | Dec 2008 | B2 |
20030079430 | Hanks | May 2003 | A1 |
20030159373 | Lien | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20040010988 | Jaycox et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040154242 | Hudoba et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040221534 | Hanks | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050279465 | Gower | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060151132 | Scalfani et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060248819 | Coenraets | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070101666 | Munch | May 2007 | A1 |
20080000056 | Murray | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080040994 | Borland | Feb 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080313979 A1 | Dec 2008 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11767753 | Jun 2007 | US |
Child | 11849691 | US |