Storm sewer overflow control device

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6406216
  • Patent Number
    6,406,216
  • Date Filed
    Friday, July 7, 2000
    24 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, June 18, 2002
    22 years ago
  • Inventors
  • Examiners
    • Hartmann; Gary S.
    Agents
    • Greer, Burns & Crain, LTD.
Abstract
A storm sewer overflow control device for controlling runoff surge flows from a generally vertically oriented storm drain into a generally horizontally oriented storm sewer pipe includes an engagement portion configured for insertion into the storm sewer pipe, a flow control portion attachable to the engagement portion and configured for receiving runoff surge flow flowing down the storm drain and slowing the flow for entry into the storm sewer through the engagement portion. The engagement portion is radially expandable to tightly and frictionally engage an interior surface of the storm sewer pipe, and preferably is configured to expand radially as it is shortened axially.
Description




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




The present invention relates generally to flood control devices for controlling storm-generated runoff water, and specifically to a storm sewer overflow device for controlling storm or flood generated surges of runoff flow into storm sewers.




Conventional municipal flood control systems include storm sewer mains placed parallel to the roads, with individual residential, multi-family or commercial branch lines feeding into the mains. The branch lines and mains are generally horizontally oriented in the ground, and are pitched or inclined a specified amount to facilitate water flow from one location to another. Storm drains are periodically placed along the sides of the roads, and the roads are graded to direct water into these drains. The drains are generally vertically oriented, and are in fluid communication with the mains, and possibly also with branch lines.




During or after heavy rains and/or rapid snow melt, substantial amounts of water are directed into the drains and ultimately into the mains. In some cases, the incoming water volume is greater than the capacity of the mains, and the water, seeking the point of least resistance, may saturate the main line first, not allowing for residential branch lines to drain. This back flow is a major cause of residential flooding. In localities where the sewage sewers and the drain sewers are combined, the backflow may create potentially hazardous health consequences for the flooded residences.




Accordingly, efforts have been made to slow the flow of incoming water to the drains to a rate which can be accommodated by the mains without causing backflow. One such device operates on a vortex principle, when placed in the storm drain. A typical vortex device is made of stainless steel and includes a horizontal portion configured for engaging the main, and a flow control portion configured for receiving the incoming flow and creating a vortex for restricting the amount of water which enters the main through the horizontal portion. In this manner, the vortex device delays the entry of water into the horizontal portion, so that the sewers can accommodate the water without backing up the residential or feed sewer lines.




Conventional vortex devices are provided in various sizes to match main pipe diameters known in the industry. Installation is effected by forcing the horizontal portion into the end of the main which communicates with the storm drain, and employing a hydraulic ram to force a sealing friction fit between the horizontal portion and the inside surface of the main.




This procedure is acceptable in areas where the pipes are relatively new and in good condition. However, in established areas with aged plumbing systems, the pipes become misshapen and/or corroded with age. In areas with clay pipes, the pipes often become oval in shape with age and leaks due to cracking are widespread. The act of forcing the conventional vortex device into fragile, corroded and/or misshapen pipes often causes the pipes to collapse or to be otherwise unacceptable for use. Also, conventional vortex devices are hand fabricated, resulting in significant dimensional deviations. Such deviations in many cases make it difficult to fit vortex devices into pipes.




In situations where the installation of a vortex device causes the pipes to collapse or become otherwise damaged, the area immediately surrounding the installation must be excavated so that a new pipe end may be installed which can accommodate the vortex device. As will be appreciated, this is a time consuming and expensive procedure.




Even when the conventional vortex devices are properly installed and under favorable conditions, the units are heavy due to their stainless steel construction, and difficult to manipulate in the often cramped working conditions of storm drains. Also, conventional vortex devices cannot be removed to clear trapped debris without removing the entire unit. This also requires heavy equipment and often leads to damage or destruction of the pipe in the immediate area.




Thus, there is a need for an improved vortex device which is more easily installed into a variety of operational applications and pipe conditions without damaging or destroying the pipe. There is also a need for such a device which can be removed from the pipe for cleaning or pipe repair without damaging or destroying the pipe.




Accordingly, a first object of the present invention is to provide an improved storm sewer overflow control device which is configured to tightly and securely fit in a variety of pipe diameters and conditions.




Another object of the present invention is to provide an improved storm sewer overflow control device which is installable without the use of heavy equipment.




Still another object of the present invention is to provide an improved storm sewer overflow control device which is easy to remove for the clearing of debris or for pipe repair purposes.




Yet another object of the present invention is to provide an improved storm sewer overflow control device which is lightweight and easily manipulable in storm drains.




A further object of the present invention is to provide an improved storm sewer overflow control device which adequately and/or selectively restricts the incoming flow of flood water to prevent the overloading of sewer mains.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




The above-listed objects are met or exceeded by the present storm sewer overflow control device. The purpose of the present unit is to slow the drainage from the street sewer, keeping water on the street longer and giving priority to the residential branch lines until the rain slows down. A first advantage of the present device is that it can be installed in sewer pipes having a variety of dimensions, shapes and conditions. Also, the present device is easy to install or remove from sealing engagement with the pipe using simple hand tools, and in difficult working conditions, namely in the storm drain itself. The use of polymeric materials makes the present device resistant to corrosion, lightweight to handle, inexpensive to produce and affords the capability for mass production, thus resulting in uniform dimensions compared to conventional overflow control devices.




More specifically, a storm sewer overflow control device is provided for controlling runoff surge flows from a first pipe into a generally normally oriented second pipe. The device includes an engagement portion configured for insertion into the second pipe, a flow control portion attachable to the engagement portion and configured for receiving runoff surge flow flowing down the storm drain and slowing the flow for entry into the second pipe through said engagement portion. The engagement portion is radially expandable to engage an interior surface of the second pipe for creating a tight friction fit.




In the preferred embodiment, the engagement portion is configured with at least one component which expands radially as desired to tightly engage the corresponding inner wall of a target pipe. In one embodiment, the expansion is created by axial shortening of the engagement portion. In another embodiment, components of the engagement portion are moved axially to create the radial expansion. In a preferred embodiment, the radial expansion is obtained through the controlled movement of a wedge ring against radially expandable slats. It is also preferred to circumscribe the slats with at least one compressible annular member such as an O-ring or a quad ring. Such an annular member provides a tight frictional relationship against the inside of the pipe. The annular member is compressed against the inside of the pipe by the radially expanding engagement portion, and is prevented from slipping off the fingers by a cone-shaped wedge ring at a distal end of the engagement portion. Once installed, the harder the present device is pulled axially from the sewer mouth, the tighter is the locking action, since the annular member “walks up” the wedge ring, thus increasing its diameter in an opposite direction from the typical tightening direction. Another annular member is preferably provided near the junction of the flow control portion and the horizontal portion, to seal the entry to the pipe and by preventing water from entering the pipe by bypassing the flow control portion. An optional feature is a restrictor disk installable in the device to control the velocity of water flowing into the sewer main.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS





FIG. 1

is a schematic view of a storm water plumbing system, including a storm drain, several storm sewers, and the present storm sewer overflow control device;





FIG. 2

is a rear perspective elevational view of a first embodiment of the present storm sewer overflow control device;





FIG. 3

is a front perspective elevational view of the device of

FIG. 2

;





FIG. 4

is an elevational view of the inside of the cowl of the present device;





FIG. 5

is a sectional view taken along the line


5





5


of FIG.


2


and in the direction generally indicated;





FIG. 6

is a front elevational view of a first embodiment of the present device with the cowl removed;





FIG. 7

is a perspective elevational view of an alternate embodiment of the present device;





FIG. 8

is a perspective elevational view of a resilient ring of the type suitable for use with the present invention;





FIG. 9

is a top perspective elevational view of a V-seal of the type suitable for use with the present device;





FIG. 9A

is a sectional view taken along the line


9


A—


9


A of

FIG. 9

in the direction generally indicated;





FIG. 10

is a side elevational view of a second alternate embodiment of the present device, shown in an inserted position;





FIG. 11

is a side elevational view of the device of

FIG. 10

shown in the locked position;





FIG. 12

is a perspective elevational view of a spider for use with the device of

FIGS. 10 and 11

;





FIG. 13

is a side elevational view of a third alternate embodiment of the present device shown in an inserted position;





FIG. 14

is a side elevational view of the device of

FIG. 13

shown in the locked position;





FIG. 15

is a perspective elevational view of a spider element for use with the device of

FIG. 13

; and





FIG. 16

is a perspective view of an alternate embodiment of the device of FIG.


1


.











DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT




Referring now to

FIG. 1

, a conventional storm water plumbing system is schematically depicted and generally designated


10


. The system


10


, typically placed underground adjacent a road


12


, includes at least one generally vertically disposed storm drain


14


which is typically provided with an apertured manhole cover (not shown). At least one generally horizontally oriented storm sewer main


16


has an end


18


in fluid communication with the storm drain


14


as is known in the art. In some cases, residential or commercial storm sewer branch lines


20


may also be in fluid communication with the storm drain


14


. The present storm sewer overflow control device, generally designated


22


, is shown operationally disposed in the end


18


of the storm sewer main


16


. It will be appreciated that the present device


22


is designed to be used wherever fluid velocity reduction is desired when fluid flows from a first pipe to a generally normally oriented second pipe.




Referring now to

FIGS. 2 and 3

, the storm sewer overflow control device


22


principally includes an engagement portion


24


configured for insertion into the pipe


16


, and a flow control portion


26


which is attachable to the engagement portion


24


and is configured for receiving runoff surge flow flowing down the storm drain


14


and slowing the flow for entry into the storm sewer


16


through the engagement portion.




In the preferred embodiment, the engagement portion


24


includes a plurality of annularly spaced, generally parallel slats


28


, each having a proximal end


30


closer to the flow control portion


26


and the storm drain


14


, and a distal end


32


extending down into the sewer pipe


16


. For ease of manufacturing, it is preferable that each slat is virtually identical, and has a length and a thickness which can vary with the application, however a length in the range of 8 to 12 inches is preferred.




The proximal ends


30


are each joined to a radially extending flange


34


which is oriented relative to the slats preferably at an approximate 90° angle, and the preferably annular arrangement of the slats


28


defines a generally circular passageway


36


. An opening


38


(shown hidden) in the flange


34


is in fluid communication with the passageway


36


. The diameter of the opening


38


may vary to suit the application, and will preferably be smaller than the diameter of the passageway


36


. In the preferred embodiment, the flange


34


and the slats


28


are integrally fabricated from a durable polymeric material known for its strength, environmental durability, chemical resistance, and water resistance. An example of such a material is acrylo-butadiene-styrene (ABS), however other known equivalent materials are also contemplated.




A peripheral edge


40


of the flange


34


is provided with a plurality of eyelets


42


. Also, in the preferred embodiment a plurality of support gussets


44


are provided at the junction of the proximal ends


30


and the flange


34


for added structural strength. In the preferred embodiment, the slats


28


are separated along their entire lengths, however it is contemplated that they may be joined together by a solid and optionally potentially relatively thickened band


46


(shown partially in

FIGS. 2 and 6

) for added structural support.




Referring now to

FIGS. 2

,


3


and


5


, opposite the proximal ends


30


, the distal ends


32


are free, and engage an inclined or ramped surface


48


of a generally frusto-conical wedge ring


50


, which is oriented to contact inside surfaces


52


of each of the slats


28


. In size, the wedge ring


50


has a first outside diameter


54


which approximates the diameter of the passageway


36


, and which is oriented toward the flange


34


. A second, larger diameter


56


is at the outer edge of the inclined surface


48


, and defines the degree of incline when a straight line connects the respective diameters


54


,


56


. The second diameter


56


faces away from the flange


34


.




An inside surface


58


of the wedge ring


50


has at least one and preferably two bosses


60


secured to the surface


58


and having threaded bores


62


. Additional bosses


60


are contemplated depending on the application. In the preferred embodiment, the wedge ring


50


is made of the same or a similar material as the flange


34


, and the bosses


62


are integrally molded with the ring. Also, while shown as solid, the wedge ring


50


may be constructed with hollowed out portions to conserve material without sacrificing strength, as is well known in the art.




At least one and preferably two annular resilient rings or seals


64


are provided to circumscribe the slats


28


. In the illustrated embodiment, the rings


64


are O-rings, one ring


64


is disposed closer to the proximal end


30


or the flange


34


, and the other is disposed closer to the distal end


32


or the wedge ring


50


. However, it is also contemplated that the O-ring


64


closer to the distal end


32


can be a quad ring or similar noncircular shaped ring. It is preferred that the O-rings


64


are dimensioned so that upon placement about the slats


28


, a tight gripping force is exerted by the rings against all of the slats, to the extent that the slats compress radially to a small extent as a result of this force. It is also preferred that the seal


64


located closer to the proximal end


30


will sealingly engage the mouth of the horizontal sewer main


16


or pipe into which the engagement portion


24


is inserted, so that water may not enter the main


16


by bypassing the device


22


.




An important feature of the present storm sewer overflow control device


22


is that it is configured to be sealingly and/or tightly frictionally secured within a wide variety of pipe diameters and of pipes of varying conditions. This feature is achieved by making the engagement portion


24


expandable to engage an interior surface


66


(best seen in

FIG. 1

) of the sewer pipe


16


. More specifically, the engagement portion


24


is radially expandable to create a friction fit against the interior surface


66


of the pipe for retaining the engagement portion in the pipe. In some cases, the engagement portion will sealingly engage the interior pipe surface


66


so that water may not pass between the seal and the surface


66


.




Referring now to

FIGS. 2 and 5

, in the preferred embodiment, this expansion is obtained through an expander mechanism, generally designated


68


. Included in the expander mechanism


68


are the bosses


60


and a preferably corresponding number of threaded fasteners


70


. While the fastener


70


is shown in

FIG. 2

in shortened format for clarity, the fasteners are at least as long as the slats


28


and are disposed on the insides thereof to be threadably engaged in the bores


62


. Preferably stainless steel, polymeric or other corrosion resistant material, the fasteners


70


may be bolts, screws, Allen heads, Torx or other known fastener designs. Also contemplated are elongated rods with offset locking cams. Heads


72


(

FIG. 3

) of the fasteners


70


are rotationally disposed, yet axially fixed on the opposite side of the flange


34


from the slats


28


.




Rotation of the fasteners


70


in the bores


62


will draw the wedge ring


50


toward the flange


34


. In so doing, the distal ends


32


of the slats


28


will be engaged by the inclined surface


48


and expanded radially to expand to tightly engage the inside surface


66


of the pipe


16


. In other words, as the engagement portion


24


shortens axially, it expands radially.




Referring now to

FIG. 5

, it will be seen that the O-ring


64


located closer to the wedge ring


50


deforms at its lower edge


65


to conform to the surface of the inclined slats


32


. Upon radial expansion of the engagement portion


24


against the inside surface


66


of the pipe


16


, an outer edge


67


will also deform.




Referring now to

FIGS. 2

,


3


,


4


and


6


, turning now to the flow control portion


26


of the storm sewer overflow control device


22


, the portion


26


, also referred to as a cowl, is preferably configured to be fixed to the flange


34


on a side


74


opposite the slats


28


. However, it is also contemplated that the cowl


26


may be releasably attachable to the flange


34


. Accordingly, the cowl


26


has a like number of eyelets


76


which are dimensioned and configured to be in registry with the eyelets


42


on the flange


34


. Upon orientation of the cowl


26


over the flange


34


so that the eyelets


42


,


76


are in registry, preferably corrosion resistant fasteners (not shown) can be used to attach the two components. Any type of threaded or non-threaded fastener can be used to secure the eyelets together, as long as the cowl


26


is secured to the flange


34


in a watertight manner. If desired, opposing engaged edges of the flange


34


and the cowl


26


may be provided with a tongue-in-groove configuration or other type of gasket or seal relationship.




In configuration, the cowl


26


is designed to create a flow path for water attempting to enter the sewer pipe


16


. An inlet


78


is disposed to receive water flowing down the storm drain


14


, yet to restrict the volume of water which may enter the pipe


16


. Further, the inlet


78


is oriented at an approximate 90° angle to the axis of the passageway


36


to reduce the velocity of the incoming water. In addition, a sidewall


80


of the cowl


26


has a portion


82


extending into the inlet


78


to act as a diverter vane.




Referring now to

FIG. 4

, the diverter vane


82


and the generally circular shape of the sidewall


80


create a vortex-like flow path


84


which further reduces the velocity of the incoming water. A cover panel


86


further defines the flow path


84


, which is in fluid communication with the passageway


36


, and is preferably integrally formed with the sidewall


80


. In the preferred embodiment, the cover panel


86


is provided with a number of fastener apertures


88


dimensioned and positioned to receive fastener heads located


72


at proximal ends of the fasteners


70


. Thus, the heads


72


are accessible through the flow control portion


26


.




To further control and reduce the velocity of water flowing into the passageway


36


, the flange opening


38


may potentially have a smaller diameter than the passageway, to form a restriction in the flow path


84


. It is contemplated that a supplemental restrictor disk


90


having an aperture


92


which is smaller in diameter than the opening


38


may be secured to the flange


34


to further restrict the flow velocity into the passageway


36


. The restrictor disk


90


may be secured to the flange


34


using any known fastening technology, including threaded fasteners, chemical adhesives and/or ultrasonic welding. It is also contemplated that the disk


90


be configured as a replacement to the flange


34


.




Referring now to

FIGS. 7-10

, an alternate embodiment of the device


22


is generally designated


100


. Components shared with the device


22


are designated with identical reference numbers. One main difference between the devices


22


,


100


is in the construction of the compressible resilient rings


64


, which are also referred to as wedge members. In the device


100


, the rings, designated


102


for the distal ring, and


104


for the proximal ring, have distinctive shapes and functions.




Referring now to

FIGS. 7 and 8

, the distal ring


102


is a compressible ring having at least one flat side for engaging the engagement portion


24


. The purpose of this ring is the same as that of the distal ring


64


in the device


22


, i.e., to provide a tight friction fit between the engagement portion


24


and the inner surface


66


of the pipe


16


to retain the device


100


inside the pipe


16


. In some cases, a water-tight seal will be achieved between the ring


102


and the pipe


16


, but that is not required.




The flat-sided configuration of the ring


102


is preferred since it prevents the ring from creeping along the engagement portion


24


during the engagement process. In the preferred embodiment, the ring


102


includes a pair of radially spaced, upper and lower generally flat band-like portions


106


,


108


. The upper portion


106


engages the inside surface


66


of the pipe


16


, and the lower portion


108


engages the engagement portion


24


, specifically so as to circumscribe the slats


28


. The relatively flat configuration of the upper and lower portions


106


,


108


facilitates gripping and prevents unwanted movement of the ring


102


relative to the engagement portion


24


.




It is also preferred that the radially spaced relationship of the bands


106


,


108


is maintained by a honeycomb portion


110


. In the preferred embodiment, the honeycomb portion is made of a plurality of adjacent box-like cells


112


with closed rear walls


114


and adjacent cells are defined by radially projecting ribs


116


. The ribs


116


generally extend between the upper and lower bands


106


,


108


. It is also preferred that the ring


102


be provided with a plurality of peripherally spaced, radially projecting gripping formations


118


which facilitate a positive grip when the inside surface


66


of the pipe


16


is uneven, and provides additional compressibility when the engagement portion is radially expanded.




In the preferred embodiment, the ring


102


is integrally formed, as by injection molding, and the material is a rubber-like composition such as buna-N rubber or PVC. However other compositions of compressible, water-resistant and environmentally-resistant materials are contemplated.




Referring now to

FIGS. 7

,


9


and


9


A the proximal ring


104


is preferably made of the same material as the ring


102


, and is preferably disposed between the flange


34


and the proximal ends


30


of the slats


28


. As seen in

FIG. 7

, the engagement portion


24


may be provided with support ribs


105


which form a locating stop for the ring


104


. These support ribs


105


help ensure a sealing engagement of the device


100


in the pipe


16


. The main purpose of the ring


104


is to prevent water from bypassing the flow control portion


26


and entering the pipe


16


to cause flooding without being delayed. In other words, the ring


104


creates a water-tight seal between the device


100


and the pipe


16


.




In the preferred embodiment, the ring


104


is configured as a V-seal having an open end


120


and an opposite pointed end


122


. Upon assembly of the ring to the device


100


, the pointed end


122


is directed toward the distal end


32


. More specifically, the ring


104


includes an angled outer wall


124


which engages the sewer pipe


16


, and an inner wall


126


which is oriented generally parallel to an axis of the engagement portion


24


and engages the device


100


, preferably by circumscribing the device between the flange


34


and the slats


28


. The inner and outer walls


126


,


124


intersect at the pointed end


122


. In addition, the outer wall


124


has a peripheral edge portion


128


which is generally parallel with the axis of the engagement portion


24


. This orientation of the edge portion


128


assists in the sealing engagement of the ring


104


with the mouth of the pipe


16


. The design is such that, at the open end


120


, due to its shape, in coming water actually exerts sufficient pressure against the seal to increase its sealing properties. In addition, the flared or conical orientation of the outer w all


124


enables the device


100


to sealingly engage pipes of slightly noncircular circumference, as occurs to such pipes through age, settling and/or corrosion.




Referring now t o

FIGS. 10-13

, a second alternate embodiment of the present device is generally designated


130


. Components shared with the devices


22


and


10


are designated with identical reference numbers. A main distinguishing feature of the device


130


is the manner in which the engagement portion


132


radially expands to securely engage the inner surface


66


of the pipe


16


.




Instead of being relatively cylindrical, as is the engagement portion


24


, the engagement portion


132


is frusto-conical or tapered toward the distal end


32


. This tapered configuration facilitates insertion of the device


130


into the pipe. The slats


28


are replaced by a generally tubular body


134


having a plurality of elongate slots


136


. In the preferred embodiment, these slots


136


open at the distal end


30


. The ring


104


is provided as a V-seal as in the device


100


. However, the distal ring


102


(also referred to as a wedge member) is provided as an O-ring which is configured for rolling or sliding action toward the proximal end


30


of the device


130


.




Referring now to

FIG. 12

, a spider member


138


preferably includes a ring


140


dimensioned to reciprocally linearly move within the tubular body


134


. Further, the ring


140


is open in the center to facilitate the flow of water therethrough, and not provide an obstruction. As such, the ring


140


is configured to suit the diameter of the tubular body


134


. A plurality of tapped bores


142


is provided for receiving the ends of the fasteners


70


. The spider member


138


may be made of any rigid, environmentally resistant material, such as ABS or equivalent.




In addition, a plurality of radially extending fingers


144


are constructed and arranged on the ring


140


to matingly and slidingly engage the corresponding slots


136


. The number and size of the slots


136


and fingers


144


may vary to suit the application, as long as there are enough to engage an O-ring


64


,


102


and push it toward the proximal end


30


as described below. It will be appreciated that the fingers


144


must be tall enough to engage the O-ring


64


,


102


as it progresses up the widening tubular body


134


, while not being too tall to contact the inner surface


66


of the pipe


16


.




Referring now to

FIGS. 10 and 11

, the assembled device


130


is shown in an insertion position (

FIG. 10

) just after insertion of the device in the pipe and before it is secured or locked in place; and a locked position (

FIG. 11

) after the radially expanding engagement portion has been pulled toward the proximal end


30


to securely fasten the device


130


in the pipe


16


. The relatively smaller diameter distal end


32


facilitates insertion, and the fasteners


70


are rotated to bring the spider member


138


, and the captured O-ring


64


,


102


, toward the proximal end


30


. As soon as the O-ring


64


,


102


becomes wedged between the pipe


16


and the tubular body


134


, the device


130


will become frictionally secured to the pipe. It will be appreciated, that, just as is the case with the devices


22


and


100


, the device


130


is easily removable from the pipe


16


merely by backing out the fasteners


70


, which will push the spider member


138


toward the distal end


32


.




Referring now to

FIGS. 13-15

, a third alternate embodiment of the present device is generally designated


150


, and components which are shared with the devices


22


,


100


and


130


are identified with identical reference numbers. The device


150


is substantially identical to the device


130


, with the exception of the spider member


152


. Instead of a separate O-ring


64


,


102


, the spider member


152


is provided with a plurality of radially extending arm portions


154


, each of which is constructed and arranged to project through a corresponding slot


136


, and at least one of said arm portions is provided with a resilient wedge member


156


. As is the case with the device


130


, the number and configuration of the slots


136


and the arm portions


154


may vary depending on the application.




In the preferred embodiment, the wedge member


156


is a segment of resilient rubber or foam and is configured for providing a wedged friction fit between the inner surface


66


of the pipe


16


and the tubular body


134


. As is the case with the fingers


144


, the radial arms


154


are dimensioned to slide forward the slots


136


toward the proximal end


30


with prematurely engaging the inner surface


66


. However, once the wedge members


156


are securely wedged between the inner surface of the pipe


16


and the tubular body


134


, the device


150


is securely positioned in the pipe as are the other devices


22


,


100


and


130


.




In the embodiment


150


, it is especially preferred that the arms


154


are long enough to clear the tubular body


134


, yet not too long so that they will hang up on the inside surface


66


of the pipe


16


prior to obtaining a tight engagement. An alternate length of the arm


154


is shown at


154




a


. To this end, the arms


154


are preferably provided with a hinged attachment joint


158


to the ring


152


. In the preferred embodiment the hinged joint takes the form of an integrally molded living hinge, as is well known in the art. However, alternate known hinge configurations are contemplated, provided they meet strength and corrosion resistance requirements.




Referring now to

FIG. 16

, yet another alternate embodiment of the device


22


is shown and generally designated


160


. Components shared with the embodiment


22


have been designated with identical reference numbers. The distinguishing feature of the device


160


is that it is provided with a clog release mechanism, generally designated


162


. It has been found that, in some cases, debris carried by the flow of water into the sewer system


14


,


16


may become caught or wedged in the device


22


. While a main function of the device


22


and the other embodiments described above is to temporarily retard the flow of water into the pipe


16


, the presence of debris is considered undesirable. Among other problems, the debris creates unwanted obstruction to water flow through the device


22


.




Thus, in function, the clog release mechanism


160


is configured to temporarily create a relatively unobstructed path for water through the device


160


and into the sewer pipe


16


. This is accomplished by temporarily increasing the dimensions of the water flow path through the unit


160


. The result is that the increased flow through the unit will flush away any debris. Alternatively, if the debris has totally clogged the unit


160


, the mechanism


162


will allow the pipe


14


to be drained of standing water to that the unit may be accessed by a service person to manually clear the clog.




In the preferred version of this embodiment, the release mechanism


162


takes the form of a hinged door


164


which is basically cut out from the sidewall


80


of the cowl


26


. It is important that the door


164


be dimensioned so that it creates an opening below the end of the vane portion


82


(seen in FIG.


4


). By creating an access from the exterior of the cowl


26


to the opening


38


(FIG.


6


), debris caught by the vane


82


will be more readily flushed from the interior of the cowl and/or standing water in the pipe


14


may be drained off to facilitate service access to the unit


160


. However, it is preferred that the clog release mechanism


162


provide for remote actuation so that service personnel do not have to climb into the sewer pipe


14


to clear the clog or to reset the device


160


for use.




The presence of the door


164


creates an opening


166


bordered by the cowl


26


and the flange


34


. A pair of generally arcuate door stops


168


are preferably molded into opposing portions of the cowl


26


and the flange


34


to create a stop for the door


164


. The stops


168


also create a seal point for the closed door, so that incoming water cannot bypass the vane


82


during normal operation. The head pressure or force of incoming water will also press the door


164


against the stops


168


, enhancing this sealing relationship. Also, a hinge point


170


is created at a hinge end


172


of the door, and employs a pair of the existing adjacent eyelets


76


and


42


. An additional eyelet


173


is provided on an outer edge of the sidewall


80


. A tubular hinge boss


174


is preferably molded to the hinge end


172


to support an elongated hinge pin


176


or threaded fastener. It is also contemplated that the hinge boss may be formed in a piano hinge style, with alternating boss segments formed on the cowl sidewall


80


and on the hinge end


172


of the door


164


.




A free end


178


of the door


164


is preferably provided with an eyelet


180


to which is attached a tether cord, lanyard or wire


182


having a loop or handle


184


. It is contemplated that, for this embodiment, the device


160


will be situated in the sewer pipe


16


so that the inlet


78


faces down, or in other words, the unit


22


is rotated 180° from that shown in

FIGS. 2-4

. This orientation has in some cases been found to reduce clogging. As such, by pulling up on the cord


182


, the door


164


is pulled open to release trapped debris. It is also contemplated that the cord


182


will be of sufficient length that the handle


184


is accessible by a user located on the ground or street level. Thus, clogs can be alleviated without having to climb into the water-filled sewer


14


.




Once the clog is relieved and any trapped water flows down the sewer pipes


14


,


16


, the door


164


is preferably biased to return to the closed position where it engages the stops


168


. The biasing force is preferably provided by a spring


186


, which in the embodiment


160


is coiled around or incorporated into the hinge boss


174


. It is contemplated that the type and/or orientation of the spring


186


may vary to suit the application.




It is also contemplated that the location of the door


164


may change to suit the application, such as being located on an outer face


188


of the cowl


26


, or elsewhere on the sidewall


80


, or moving radially inward instead of outward, or a section of the sidewall is movable radially inward, as long as the vane portion


82


is bypassed. Other contemplated alternatives are that the cowl


26


is temporarily released from engagement with the flange


34


to temporarily increase the water flow through the unit


160


.




In operation, the storm sewer overflow control device


22


,


100


,


130


,


150


,


160


may be installed assembled or in component form and assembled on site. If preassembled, the cowl


26


is secured to the flange


34


. The engagement portion


24


is inserted into the pipe with the inlet


78


facing downward, until the flange


34


abuts the wall of the storm drain


14


(best seen in FIG.


1


). Although the inlet


78


is shown in the present

FIGS. 1-4

as facing upward, it has been found that in that position, the inlet becomes easily clogged with tree branches, leaves and other debris. The V-seal


104


creates a water-tight seal between the device


22


,


100


,


130




150


and the pipe


16


. Next, the installer places the appropriate driving tool, such as a nut driver or a screwdriver, preferably of the powered variety, into engagement with the head


72


of each of the fasteners


70


. Preferably, the fastener heads


72


are accessed from outside the cover panel


86


as depicted in FIG.


3


. As the fasteners


70


are rotated clockwise, the wedge ring


50


or the spider members


138


,


152


will be drawn toward the flange


34


. In this manner, the slats


28


, the O-ring


64


,


102


or the resilient wedge members


156


are radially expanded to tightly engage the inside surface


66


of the pipe


16


. In some cases, a sealing relationship is facilitated by the O-rings


64


,


102


which are compressed against the interior of the pipe


16


. Once the radial expansion is sufficient to tightly frictionally secure the device


22


,


100


,


130


,


150


,


160


within the pipe, the device becomes more difficult to remove from the pipe by axially pulling on the flow control portion


26


. It has been found that this increased holding force is provided in part by movement of the distal ring


102


toward the distal end


32


as the radial expansion occurs, particularly in the embodiments


22


and


100


.




If the device


22


,


100


,


130


,


150


,


160


is provided unassembled, the engagement portion


24


may be inserted into the pipe


16


as described above, and the cowl


26


fastened to the flange on site by inserting fasteners into the mating eyelets


42


,


76


. Expansion is achieved as described above in relation to the preassembled device. However, the fastener heads


72


may be accessed prior to attaching the cowl


26


by engaging the heads on the flange surface


74


.




In the event that the device


22


,


100


,


130


,


150


,


160


becomes clogged with debris, or must be repaired, the operator has a choice of whether to employ the biased clog release mechanism


162


or, how much of the device


22


, etc. to disassemble. If desired, only the cowl


26


need be removed by removing the fasteners from the eyelets


42


,


76


. Alternatively, the entire device


22


,


100


,


130


,


150


,


160


may be removed by unscrewing the fasteners


70


. This operation radially retracts the slats


28


and the O-rings


64


, or the O-ring


102


or the resilient wedge members


156


so that the device


22


,


100


,


130


,


150


,


160


can be withdrawn from the pipe


16


. An advantage of the present invention is that by using plastic components for the cowl


26


and the engagement portion


24


, even if the fasteners


70


become corroded they can still be removed, unlike conventional stainless steel vortex units.




Thus, it will be seen that a lightweight, easy to assemble and disassemble storm sewer overflow control device has been provided. Many sizes and conditions of pipes can be accommodated, and a tight, sealing fit can be achieved without the use of heavy equipment. The relatively light weight of the present device


22


makes installation easy, even under the cramped conditions in a pipe. Existing pipes should not be damaged during installation of the present device


22


,


100


,


130


,


150


,


160


thus minimizing the time and expense of providing storm sewer overflow control, as opposed to conventional devices.




While a particular embodiment of the storm sewer overflow control device of the invention has been shown and described, it will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that changes and modifications may be made thereto without departing from the invention in its broader aspects and as set forth in the following claims.



Claims
  • 1. A storm sewer overflow control device for controlling runoff surge flows from a first pipe into a generally normally oriented second pipe, comprising:an engagement portion configured for insertion into the second pipe; a flow control portion attachable to said engagement portion and configured for receiving runoff surge flow flowing down the storm drain and slowing the flow for entry into the second pipe through said engagement portion; said flow control portion including a cowl attachable to a flange and having a sidewall defining an inlet; said engagement portion having a proximal end and a distal end, and at least one component being radially expandable to create a friction fit against an interior surface of the second pipe for retaining said engagement portion in the second pipe; clog release means for releasing debris trapped between said flow control portion and said engagement portion, said clog release means includes at least one door formed in said sidewall, said door defining an opening bordered by said cowl and said flange for temporarily increasing the flow of water through said device.
  • 2. The device as defined in claim 1 wherein said engagement portion is configured to expand radially as it is shortened axially.
  • 3. The device as defined in claim 2 wherein said engagement portion includes a plurality of spaced, generally parallel slats each having proximal and distal ends, said proximal ends being joined to a flange, said device further including a wedge ring, said distal ends engaging said wedge ring.
  • 4. The device as defined in claim 3 further including an expander mechanism attached to said wedge ring, said wedge ring engages inner surfaces of said slats, said expander mechanism being configured for pulling said wedge ring toward said flange to push said slats radially against an inner surface of the second pipe.
  • 5. The device as defined in claim 4 wherein said expander mechanism includes at least one fastener with a distal end engaging said wedge ring, and a proximal end accessible near said flange so that rotation of said fastener causes said wedge ring to move toward said flange.
  • 6. The device as defined in claim 5 wherein said proximal end of said fastener is accessible through said flow control portion.
  • 7. The device as defined in claim 1 further including at least one annular resilient ring configured to circumscribe said engagement portion.
  • 8. The device as defined in claim 7 further including a pair of said rings, one located closer to said distal end, the other located closer to said proximal end for preventing water from entering the second pipe and bypassing the flow control portion.
  • 9. The device as defined in claim 8 wherein said ring closer to said proximal end is a V-seal having an open end and a pointed end, wherein said pointed end is directed toward said distal end and said open end flares when subjected to increasing water pressure, further increasing the sealing capabilities of said ring.
  • 10. The device as defined in claim 9, wherein said V-seal has an angled outer wall portion and an inner wall which extends generally parallel to an axis of said engagement portion.
  • 11. The device as defined in claim 10, wherein said outer wall has a peripheral edge which is oriented generally parallel to an axis of said engagement portion.
  • 12. The device as defined in claim 8 wherein said ring closer to said distal end is a compressible ring having at least one flat side for engaging said engagement portion.
  • 13. The device as defined in claim 12 wherein said ring includes a pair of radially spaced flat portions separated by a honeycomb portion.
  • 14. The device as defined in claim 12 wherein said ring closest to said distal end has a plurality of radially extending gripping formations.
  • 15. The device as defined in claim 1 wherein said at least one component which is radially expandable includes a spider member axially reciprocable relative to said engagement portion and being configured to exert a wedging clamping force upon a resilient ring as said spider member is moved toward said proximal end.
  • 16. The device as defined in claim 1 wherein said clog release means is remotely operated.
  • 17. The device as defined in claim 1 wherein said clog release door is biased to a closed position, said cowl includes a diverter vane and said door is located to define a flush flow path which circumvents said vane.
  • 18. The device as defined in claim 17 further including a tethered handle secured to a free end of said release door for remote access.
  • 19. The device as defined in claim 1 wherein said cowl has at least one diverter vane, said engagement portion defining a fluid conduit, said inlet being in fluid communication with said fluid passageway.
  • 20. The device as defined in claim 19 wherein said engagement portion includes a flange, said cowl is releasably attachable to said flange.
  • 21. The device as defined in claim 19 wherein said cowl is configured to restrict the amount of fluid entering said engagement portion.
  • 22. A storm sewer overflow control device for controlling runoff surge flows from a first pipe into a generally normally oriented second pipe, comprising:an engagement portion configured for insertion into the second pipe; a flow control portion attachable to said engagement portion and configured for receiving runoff surge flow flowing down the storm drain and slowing the flow for entry into the second pipe through said engagement portion; said engagement portion having a proximal end and a distal end, and at least one component being radially expandable to create a friction fit against an interior surface of the second pipe for retaining said engagement portion in the second pipe; and wherein said at least one component which is radially expandable includes a spider member axially reciprocable relative to said engagement portion and being configured to exert a wedging clamping force upon a resilient ring as said spider member is moved toward said proximal end.
  • 23. The device as defined in claim 22 wherein said engagement portion is generally frusto conical and narrows toward said distal end, and said spider member has a plurality of radially extending arms configured for engaging said resilient ring and pushing said ring toward said proximal end to create a wedge fit for said engagement portion against the inside of the pipe.
  • 24. The device as defined in claim 23 wherein engagement portion is generally conical in shape, narrows toward said distal end and has a plurality of spaced slots, said spider member is provided with a plurality of radially extending arm portions, each of which is constructed and arranged to project through a corresponding slot, and at least one of said arm portions is provided with a resilient wedge member.
  • 25. The device as defined in claim 24 wherein said radially extending arm portions are hingedly attached to said spider member.
  • 26. A storm sewer overflow control device for controlling runoff surge flows from a generally vertically oriented storm drain into a generally horizontally oriented storm sewer pipe, comprising:an engagement portion configured for insertion into the storm sewer pipe to define a passageway and including a flange, said engagement portion having a plurality of slots having a longitudinal axis generally parallel with an axis of said engagement portion, spider ring dimensioned for reciprocal axial movement in said passageway and having a plurality of radially projecting arms; a resilient wedge member configured for circumscribing said engagement portion; a flow control portion attachable to said flange and defining a flow path configured for receiving runoff surge flow flowing down the storm drain and slowing the flow for entry into the storm sewer pipe; and an expander mechanism configured to draw said spider ring toward said flange to engage said wedge member and to pull said wedge member toward said proximal end to wedge said wedge member against the interior of the pipe.
  • 27. A storm sewer overflow control device for controlling runoff surge flows from a generally vertically oriented storm drain into a generally horizontally oriented storm sewer pipe, comprising:an engagement portion configured for insertion into the storm sewer pipe to define a passageway and including a flange, said engagement portion having a plurality of slots having a longitudinal axis generally parallel with an axis of said engagement portion, spider ring dimensioned for reciprocal axial movement in said passageway, a plurality of radially projecting arms; a resilient wedge member configured for circumscribing said engagement portion; a flow control portion attachable to said flange and defining a flow path configured for receiving runoff surge flow flowing down the storm drain and slowing the flow for entry into the storm sewer pipe; and an expander mechanism configured to draw said spider ring toward said flange to engage said wedge member and to pull said wedge member toward said proximal end to wedge said wedge member against the interior of the pipe.
  • 28. The device as defined in claim 27 further including at least one annular V-seal disposed at said proximal end of said engagement portion for preventing water from entering the second pipe and bypassing said flow control portion.
US Referenced Citations (28)
Number Name Date Kind
601794 Hershberger Apr 1898 A
712194 Kelly Oct 1902 A
1347880 Whittaker Jul 1920 A
1525136 Kopke Feb 1925 A
1713775 Moody May 1929 A
1905919 Kevis Apr 1933 A
3173699 Nathan Mar 1965 A
3521657 Ayers Jul 1970 A
3613936 Kaiser et al. Oct 1971 A
3712631 Forchini et al. Jan 1973 A
3815748 Johannessen Jun 1974 A
4170365 Haaland Oct 1979 A
4206783 Brombach Jun 1980 A
4213619 Arlt et al. Jul 1980 A
4259988 Singh Apr 1981 A
4333499 Beck et al. Jun 1982 A
4426095 Buttner Jan 1984 A
4679595 Johannessen Jul 1987 A
4690414 Haaland Sep 1987 A
4712811 Wier Dec 1987 A
4889166 Lakatos Dec 1989 A
4982529 Mesnel Jan 1991 A
5080137 Adams Jan 1992 A
5114162 Ditcher May 1992 A
5257791 Cittadini et al. Nov 1993 A
5501472 Brancher et al. Mar 1996 A
5640988 Brereton Jun 1997 A
6082925 Raasch Jul 2000 A
Non-Patent Literature Citations (1)
Entry
Specification No. B0-81573-01 entitled Sewer Line Intake Flow Restrictor Valves, City of Chicago, Feb. 8, 2000.