The present invention generally relates to dippers for surface mining.
Typical power shovels or excavators use a bucket or dipper assembly to scoop earthen material from horizontal or vertical faces. A conventional power shovel has a boom, and the dipper is mounted on the boom via a crowd mechanism. The crowd mechanism includes a crowd pinion on the boom, and crowd rack as part of the dipper handle which pivots about the pinion and which moves translationally along the pinion. The dipper is mounted on the end of the handle. The bucket or dipper is normally provided with sharp teeth to provide a digging action against the surface being worked and further includes a cavity for collecting the material so removed. Once the earthen material is received within the dipper, the dipper is typically moved to another location for transfer of the material. The material is usually discharged into a dump truck, onto a conveyor, or merely onto a pile.
In one independent embodiment, a dipper has an inlet and an outlet and includes a front wall and an opposite back wall extending between the inlet and the outlet. A first reference plane extends from the inlet to the outlet and is positioned between the front wall and the back wall. The front wall may have a substantially linear inner surface and may be arranged relative to the first reference plane at an angle of at least 0 degrees and no more than 3 degrees. The dipper further includes two side walls connected between the front wall and the back wall and extending between the inlet and the outlet. A second reference plane extends from the inlet to the outlet and is positioned between the side walls. A lip is coupled to at least the front wall and extends outwardly from the inlet. The back wall may taper outwardly relative to the first reference plane from the inlet toward the outlet at an angle greater than 0 degrees and no more than 30 degrees, and each of the side walls may taper outwardly relative to the second reference plane from the inlet toward the outlet at an angle greater than 0 degrees and no more than 30 degrees.
In another independent embodiment of a dipper, each of the side walls of the dipper may taper outwardly relative to the second reference plane from the inlet toward the outlet at an angle greater than 0 degrees and no more than 30 degrees. The lip has opposite side surfaces, and each of the side surfaces of the lip may taper outwardly relative to the second reference plane from the inlet toward the outer surface at an angle greater than 0 degrees and no more than 30 degrees.
In yet another independent embodiment of the dipper, an inlet reference plane is defined at the inlet, and a front wall reference plane extends from the inlet to the outlet and is positioned between the front wall and the back wall. The front wall may have a substantially linear inner surface and be arranged relative to the front wall reference plane at an angle of at least 0 degrees and no more than 3 degrees. The inlet has an inlet area in the inlet reference plane, and the outlet has an outlet area in an outlet reference plane substantially parallel to the inlet reference plane. The front wall, the back wall, and the two side walls may be arranged such that the outlet area is at least 3 percent and no more than 25 percent greater than the inlet area.
Other independent aspects of the invention will become apparent by consideration of the detailed description and accompanying drawings.
Before any independent embodiments of the invention are explained in detail, it is to be understood that the invention is not limited in its application to the details of construction and the arrangement of components set forth in the following description or illustrated in the following drawings. The invention is capable of other independent embodiments and of being practiced or of being carried out in various ways.
With reference to
The right side wall 24 defines (see
The left lip plane 60 is arranged at a left lip angle 64 with respect to the side wall reference plane 40. The left lip angle 64 may be between about zero degrees and about thirty degrees (0°≤x≤30°). In some embodiments, the left lip angle 64 is between about one degree and about ten degrees (1°≤x≤10°). In the illustrated embodiment, the left lip angle 64 is about zero degrees (0°).
The right lip plane 68 is arranged at a right lip angle 72 with respect to the side wall reference plane 40. The right lip angle 72 may be between about zero degrees and about thirty degrees (0°≤x≤30°). In some embodiments, the right lip angle 72 is between about one degree and about ten degrees (1°≤x≤10°). In the illustrated embodiment, the right lip angle 72 is about zero degrees (0°).
Further, in some embodiments, the lip 36 may be arranged with the outer dimension 56 of the lip 36 larger than a comparative outer dimension at the outlet 32 of the dipper 10 so that the outlet 32 or heel 38 of the dipper 10 does not plow or rake though the material being mined, which would increase the wear on the dipper 10 and increase the force required to move the dipper 10 through the material. The left and right lip angles 64, 72 affect the outer dimension 56 and can be manipulated to provide clearance for the outlet 32, as desired.
With respect to
The front wall 14 defines a straight surface from the inlet 28 to the outlet 32 (as shown in
In the illustrated embodiment (see
The back wall 18 defines (see
With continued reference to
An outlet plane 108 is defined parallel to the inlet plane 100 (and generally perpendicular to the floor reference plane 76) at the outlet 32. An outlet area 112 for the dipper 10 (e.g., at the door) is defined in the outlet plane 108. That is to say, the front wall 14, the back wall 18, the left side wall 22, and the right side wall 26 define an outlet perimeter in the outlet plane 108, and the area within the outlet perimeter defines the outlet area 112 in the outlet plane 108.
As a result of arrangement of the front wall 14, the back wall 18, the left side wall 22, and the right side wall 24, the outlet area 112 is larger than the inlet area 104 (see
The inventive arrangement provides a dipper 10 that improves performance in digging. For example, the dipper 10 may have improved fill, dump and/or full/dump cycle time. The dipper 10 may have reduced drag during digging.
The dipper 10 may be advantageous for oil sands digging. Oil sands expand after being unearthed. The increased volume of the dipper 10 toward the outlet 32 of the dipper 10 allows the oil sands to expand within the dipper 10 while a digging action is occurring, and the oil sands will not be compacted within the dipper 10. Typically, oil sands expand about four percent (4%) in volume during a digging action (e.g., 30 seconds). The straight tapered design of the dipper 10 allows expansion without compaction and/or improves digging characteristics and efficiency. The dipper 10 may also be used to remove/mine other materials, such as, for example, copper, iron ore, overburden material, etc.
The present patent application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/686,435, titled “STRAIGHT TAPER DIPPER” and filed Apr. 14, 2015 by Dan Feld et al., which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/452,380, titled “STRAIGHT TAPER DIPPER” and filed Apr. 20, 2012 by Dan Feld et al., which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/481,615, titled “STRAIGHT TAPER DIPPER” filed May 2, 2011 by Dan Feld et al., the entire contents of all of which are incorporated by reference herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
708587 | Robinson | Sep 1902 | A |
838914 | Strom | Dec 1906 | A |
1031138 | McKee et al. | Jul 1912 | A |
1333852 | Kittredge | Mar 1920 | A |
1477539 | Clark | Dec 1923 | A |
1479340 | Trainor | Jan 1924 | A |
1481273 | Roe | Jan 1924 | A |
1496407 | Black | Jun 1924 | A |
1508322 | Heller | Sep 1924 | A |
1545943 | Crane | Jan 1925 | A |
1539863 | Pemberton | Jun 1925 | A |
1573128 | Baker | Feb 1926 | A |
1582577 | Crane | Apr 1926 | A |
1638099 | Rorabeck | Aug 1927 | A |
1745436 | Miley | Feb 1930 | A |
1757328 | Mullally | May 1930 | A |
1770543 | Miley | Jul 1930 | A |
1796737 | Buskirk | Mar 1931 | A |
1914104 | Black | Jun 1933 | A |
2025090 | Brurke | Dec 1935 | A |
2003067 | Brune | May 1936 | A |
2185176 | Bager | Jan 1940 | A |
2243965 | Larsen | Jun 1941 | A |
2336729 | Harris et al. | Dec 1943 | A |
2427897 | Burdick et al. | Oct 1947 | A |
2623309 | Frye | Dec 1952 | A |
2660323 | Carlesimo | Nov 1953 | A |
2704613 | Biedess | Mar 1955 | A |
2724518 | Charlton et al. | Nov 1955 | A |
2874491 | Larsen | Feb 1959 | A |
2926800 | Larsen et al. | Mar 1960 | A |
3003264 | Shore | Oct 1961 | A |
3107445 | Ratkowski | Oct 1963 | A |
3402486 | Branson | Sep 1968 | A |
3508674 | Schneider et al. | Apr 1970 | A |
3914885 | Moreau | Oct 1975 | A |
4449309 | Hemphill | May 1984 | A |
4517756 | Olds et al. | May 1985 | A |
4939855 | McCreary, Jr. | Jul 1990 | A |
5063694 | McCreary, Jr. | Nov 1991 | A |
5353531 | Doucette | Oct 1994 | A |
5400530 | Schmidt | Mar 1995 | A |
5815959 | Bahner | Oct 1998 | A |
5815960 | Soczka | Oct 1998 | A |
5901480 | Shamblin | May 1999 | A |
5909961 | Pullman | Jun 1999 | A |
6434862 | Hren | Aug 2002 | B1 |
7096610 | Gilmore | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7191553 | Doucette et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7832128 | Doucette et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
8590180 | Hren et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
20070107269 | Hren et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20100005689 | Leslie | Jan 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2005201272 | Nov 2005 | AU |
2012202101 | Nov 2012 | AU |
2548874 | Dec 2006 | CA |
1740461 | Mar 2006 | CN |
1967655 | Sep 2008 | EP |
429296 | May 1935 | GB |
2399562 | Sep 2004 | GB |
505772 | Apr 1976 | SU |
715707 | Feb 1980 | SU |
Entry |
---|
Decision of Rejection issued by the Chinese Patent Office for related Application No. 201511024836.6 dated Nov. 14, 2018 (18 pages including English translation). |
Office Action issued from the Canadian Patent Office for related Application No. 2775868 dated Jan. 30, 2019 (3 pages). |
“New tricks for old dogs,” Machines Past & Present, Earthmovers, Jun. 2006, pp. 111-112. |
Shi, N. et al., “A new Canadian shovel dipper design for improved performance,” CIM Bulletin, vol. 99, No. 1093, Mar./Apr. 2006. |
Joseph, T.G. et al. “Qualitative observations of dipper performance and design concerns for oil sands use,” CIM Conference, May 11, 2010. |
Joseph, T.G. et al. “Scaling to Full Size Dipper Design Via Geometric and Performance Field Data,” World Congress on Engineering 2010, vol. II, Jun. 30-Jul. 2, 2010. |
First Office Action from the State Intellectual Property Office of China for Application No. 201210125448.5 dated Aug. 5, 2015 (19 pages). |
First Office Action from the State Intellectual Property Office of China for Application No. 201511024836.6 dated Jul. 4, 2017 (22 pages). |
Australian Patent Office Examination Report for Application No. 2012202435 dated May 16, 2014 (5 pages). |
Australian Patent Office Examination Report No. 2 for Application No. 2012202435 dated Nov. 18, 2014 (3 pages). |
First Office Action from the Australian Intellectual Property Office for Application No. 2015202548 dated Jan. 9, 2016 (4 pages). |
First Office Action from the Chilean Patent Office for Application No. 1116-2012 dated Oct. 14, 2015 (11 pages). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20200157766 A1 | May 2020 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61481615 | May 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14686435 | Apr 2015 | US |
Child | 16729595 | US | |
Parent | 13452380 | Apr 2012 | US |
Child | 14686435 | US |