This application is related to the following commonly assigned U.S. patent applications which are herein incorporated by reference in their entirety: “Cellular Materials Formed Using Surface Transformation,” U.S. application Ser. No. 10/382,246, filed on Mar. 5, 2003; “Micro-Mechanically Strained Semiconductor Film,” U.S. application Ser. No. 10/379,749, filed on Mar. 5, 2003; “Localized Strained Semiconductor On Insulator,” U.S. application Ser. No. 10/425,797, filed on Apr. 29, 2003; “Strained Si/SiGe Structures by Ion Implantation,” U.S. application Ser. No. 10/431,134, filed on May 7, 2003; “Strained Semiconductor by Wafer Bonding with Misorientation,” U.S. application Ser. No. 10/425,484, filed on Apr. 29, 2003; “Micromechanical Strained Semiconductor By Wafer Bonding,” U.S. application Ser. 10/431,137, filed on May 7, 2003; and “Strained Si/SiGe/SOI Islands and Processes of Making Same,” U.S. application Ser. No. 10/634,174, filed on Aug. 5, 2003.
This disclosure relates generally to integrated circuits, and more particularly, to strained semiconductor structures.
The semiconductor industry continues to strive for improvements in the speed and performance of semiconductor devices. Strained silicon technology enhances carrier mobility in both n-channel and p-channel devices, and thus improves device speed and performance.
One technique for producing strained silicon involves growing silicon on relaxed silicon germanium (Si/SiGe) structures. There is a large mismatch in the cell structure between the Si and SiGe layers. This mismatch causes a pseudomorphic layer of Si on relaxed SiGe to be under a tensile strain that modifies the band structure and enhances carrier transport in the Si layer. In an electron inversion layer, the subband splitting is larger in strained Si because of the strain-induced band splitting in addition to that provided by quantum confinement. For example, the ground level splitting (E0(d4)-E0(d2)) in a MOS inversion layer at 1 MV/cm transverse field is ˜120 meV for unstrained Si and ˜250 meV for strained Si. The increase in energy splitting reduces inter-valley scattering and enhances NMOSFET mobility, as demonstrated at low (<0.6 MV/cm) and higher (˜1 MV/cm) vertical fields. The scaled transconductance (gm) is also improved due to the reduced density of states and enhanced non-equilibrium transport.
One method for forming the Si/SiGe layer involves epitaxially growing the Si and SiGe layers using an ultra-high vacuum chemical vapor deposition (UHVCVD) process. The UHVCVD process is a costly and complex process. The Ge content is graded in steps to form a fully relaxed SiGe buffer layer before a thin (˜20 nm) strained Si channel layer is grown. X-ray diffraction analysis can be used to quantify the Ge content and strain relaxation in the SiGe layer. The strain state of the Si channel layer can be confirmed by Raman spectroscopy. One proposed back end approach for straining silicon applies uniaxial strain to wafers/dies after the integrated circuit process is complete. The dies are thinned to membrane dimensions and then affixed to curved substrates to apply an in-plane, tensile strain after device manufacture.
There is a need in the art to provide improved strained semiconductor films and devices that incorporate the strained films, and to provide improved methods for forming strained semiconductor films.
The above mentioned problems are addressed and will be understood by reading and studying this specification. Various aspects and embodiments of the present invention mechanically stretch a semiconductor layer during full wafer bonding to form a wafer with a strained semiconductor layer. According to various embodiments, the strained semiconductor layer is an ultra-thin silicon layer.
One aspect of this disclosure relates to a method for forming a wafer. In various embodiments of the method, a predetermined contour is formed in one of a semiconductor membrane and a substrate wafer. The semiconductor membrane is bonded to the substrate wafer and the predetermined contour is straightened to induce a predetermined strain in the semiconductor membrane. In various embodiments, a substrate wafer is flexed into a flexed position, a portion of the substrate wafer is bonded to a semiconductor layer when the substrate wafer is in the flexed position, and the substrate wafer is relaxed to induce a predetermined strain in the semiconductor layer. In various embodiments, a central region of a substrate wafer is flexed into a flexed position, a bond cut process is performed to form a silicon membrane from a crystalline sacrificial wafer and bond a peripheral region of the substrate wafer to a peripheral region of a silicon membrane when the substrate wafer is in the flexed position, and the substrate wafer is relaxed to induce a predetermined strain in the silicon membrane. Other aspects and embodiments are provided herein.
This Summary is an overview of some of the teachings of the present application and not intended to be an exclusive or exhaustive treatment of the present subject matter. Further details are found in the detailed description and appended claims. Other aspects will be apparent to persons skilled in the art upon reading and understanding the following detailed description and viewing the drawings that form a part thereof, each of which are not to be taken in a limiting sense. The scope of the present invention is defined by the appended claims and their legal equivalents.
The following detailed description refers to the accompanying drawings which show, by way of illustration, specific aspects and embodiments in which the present invention may be practiced. References to “an”, “one”, or “various” embodiments in this disclosure are not necessarily to the same embodiment, and such references contemplate more than one embodiment. The various embodiments are not necessarily mutually exclusive as aspects of one embodiment can be combined with aspects of another embodiment. Other embodiments may be utilized and structural, logical, and electrical changes may be made without departing from the scope of the present invention. In the following description, the terms wafer and substrate are interchangeably used to refer generally to any structure on which integrated circuits are formed, and also to such structures during various stages of integrated circuit fabrication. Both terms include doped and undoped semiconductors, epitaxial layers of a semiconductor on a supporting semiconductor or insulating material, combinations of such layers, as well as other such structures that are known in the art. The terms “horizontal” and “vertical”, as well as prepositions such as “on”, “over” and “under” are used in relation to the conventional plane or surface of a wafer or substrate, regardless of the orientation of the wafer or substrate. The following detailed description is, therefore, not to be taken in a limiting sense, and the scope of the present invention is defined only by the appended claims, along with the full scope of equivalents to which such claims are entitled.
Aspects of the present invention strain a semiconductor layer, such as a crystalline silicon layer, by mechanical stretching of the semiconductor layer during full wafer bonding. In various embodiments, the semiconductor layer is an ultra-thin semiconductor layer. Various embodiments bond the ultra-thin semiconductor layer to a bowed flexible substrate during full wafer bonding. Various embodiments bond a semiconductor layer with a bowed surface to a fixed wafer during a full wafer bonding.
This detailed description is organized as follows. First, this discussion uses research findings of Si/SiGe to determine a desired mechanical strain for the semiconductor layer. Second, a brief discussion of full wafer bonding is provided. Third embodiments that bond semiconductor membranes to a bowed, flexible substrate are discussed. Various embodiments bow a thin flexible substrate, and various embodiments bow a thicker flexible substrate having voids formed by surface transformation. Fourth, this disclosure discusses bonding relaxed ultra-thin semiconductor membrane with a bowed shape to a rigid substrate. Fifth, this disclosure discusses bonding a single crystal wafer with a relaxed concave surface to a rigid substrate. Sixth, this disclosure discusses various method aspects for straining a semiconductor layer at a wafer scale. Seventh, this disclosure discusses a transistor that incorporates the strained semiconductor. Eighth, this disclosure discusses systems such as memory devices and computers. The headings and numbering used to organize the detailed description should not be used to limit the present invention, but rather are intended to assist the reader in navigating through this disclosure.
1. Desired Mechanical Strain
This disclosure discusses mechanically straining a wafer-sized semiconductor layer, i.e. straining a semiconductor layer at a wafer scale. According to embodiments provided in this disclosure, silicon is mechanically strained to enhance carrier mobility. Other semiconductor material can be strained in accordance with the subject matter discussed herein. Research findings for Si/SiGe structures can be used to determine desirable mechanical strain.
Si has a lattice constant of 5.43095 Å, and Ge has a lattice constant of 5.64613 Å. The lattice constant of SiGe is between the lattice constant of Si and the lattice constant of Ge, and depends on the percentage of Ge in the SiGe layer.
where the subscript LC represents the lattice constant of the SiGe or Si. Thus, as shown in Equation 2, the Si on the SiGe substrate has a biaxial strain of about 1.28%.
When the percentage of Ge in the Si1-XGeX is about 20% (near the knee of the curve), it can be calculated that the resulting strain is about 0.75%. When the percentage of Ge in the Si1-XGeX is about 40%, it can be calculated that the resulting strain is about 1.5%. Referring again to
Various embodiments of the present invention mechanically induce a strain in thin semiconductor wafers.
It is thus desirable to strain a thin semiconductor layer, such as a silicon layer, with a strain greater than 0.5% to achieve significant mobility enhancement. For further mobility enhancement, it is desirable to strain a thin semiconductor wafer, such as an ultra-thin silicon wafer with a thickness within a range of approximately 300 Å to 1000 Å, with a strain within a range of approximately 0.75% to approximately 1.5% where the mobility enhancement levels off. It is also desirable to reduce unnecessary strain and provide a margin for error without unduly affecting the mobility enhancement. Thus, it is desirable to strain a thin semiconductor layer, such as a thin silicon layer, with a strain in the range of approximately 1% to approximately 1.2%.
Ultra-thin wafers, such as single crystalline silicon wafers, have a thickness below approximately 200 microns, which is near the limit of known mechanical thinning techniques. Virginia Semiconductor, Inc. has produced these wafers with a thickness down to about 2 microns with diameters of up to 4 inches. Doping concentrations and profiles for these wafers are comparable to normal thickness wafers, and the Total Thickness Variation (TTV) is generally less than one micron. Bond-quality, ultra-thin wafers are double side polished and have micro-roughness comparable to prime grade, normal thickness wafers. Ultra-thin wafers that have a thickness of approximately 100 microns or more are mechanically similar to normal wafers and can be processed using standard techniques. As the thickness decreases further, the wafer exhibits greater flexibility to the point, at about 20 microns thick, that the wafer can be deformed into a tube, with the wafer contacted flat with the opposite edge. At a thickness less than about 10 microns, ultra-thin wafers become transparent to visible light. The increased flexibility allows ultra-thin wafers to bond to surfaces with roughness orders of magnitude greater than the limit for bonding normal thicknesses.
Recently, a bond cut technique, referred to in literature as a Smart-Cut technique, has been described for producing silicon on insulator wafers for integrated circuits. As will be described in detail below, the bond cut technique implants ions such as hydrogen, bonds two wafer surfaces together, and separates the two bonded wafers along the region of hydrogen implantation. The literature indicates that memory structures have been inverted and stacked capacitors have been buried by wafer bonding. Various techniques such as grinding, polishing, chemical etch, chemical etch with etch stops, and/or plasma assisted chemical etch, can be used to further thin the top wafer to a thickness on the order of a micron after the wafers are bonded. Besides oxide or silicon, silicon has been bonded on other materials such as sapphire wafers.
The bond cut technique will be discussed in further detail in the section entitled “Bonding Semiconductor Membrane to Bowed Substrates.” In various embodiments, the ultra-thin semiconductor film is produced by a hydrogen implantation into a sacrificial wafer leaving a single crystalline 300 Å to 1000 Å surface layer which will separate from the carrier wafer when the film is bonded face down on the device wafer. After the final high temperature bonding heat treatment, the bonded layer is polished by chemical and/or mechanical means to make the surface smoother leaving an ultra-thin strained film on the order of 300 Å to 1000 Å thick.
2. Full Wafer Bonding
3. Bonding Semiconductor Membrane to Bowed Substrates
The sacrificial wafer 505 is a single crystal wafer. The bond-cut technique conditions the sacrificial wafer 505 by implanting ions 506 into a surface 507. The ions are implanted along a plane, represented in
In the illustrated embodiment, the periphery of the substrate wafer 504 is supported by a vacuum chuck 510. The substrate wafer 504 is flexible and is capable of being influenced into a flexed position. In the illustrated embodiment, a vacuum or near vacuum, represented by arrows 511, draws the substrate wafer 504 into the chuck 510.
In various embodiments, the bonded wafers are heated to further bond the membrane 503 to the substrate wafer 504 and to cut the membrane 503 from the sacrificial wafer 505. In various embodiments, the bonding temperature is within a range of approximately 300° C. to 400° C. Heating the sacrificial wafer joins the cavities in the cleavage plane 508, allowing the remaining portion 509 of the sacrificial wafer to be removed from the membrane 503, which remains bonded to the substrate wafer 504. The remaining portion 509 of the sacrificial wafer 505 can be prepared and conditioned for another bond-cut process.
In
The thickness of the membrane 503 bonded to the substrate wafer 504 is defined by the depth of ion implantation during the bond-cut process. In various embodiments, the thickness of the membrane 503 is such that it does not yield or otherwise plastically deform under the desired mechanical strain induced by the bond. In various embodiments, the thickness of the membrane 503 is less than 200 nm, and as such is termed an ultra thin wafer. In various embodiments, the silicon layer has a thickness of about 0.1 microns (100 nm or 1000 Å). In various embodiments, the silicon layer has a thickness less than 0.1 microns. In various embodiments, the silicon layer has a thickness in a range of approximately 300 Å to 1000 Å.
In various embodiments, the silicon film is prepared for transistor fabrication. A transistor structure is discussed with respect to
As stated earlier with respect to Si/SiGe layers, it is desired to provide silicon with a strain around or greater than 0.5% to obtain the desired enhanced mobility associated with strained silicon. Thus, as shown by the example illustrated in
where E is Youngs modulus in N/mm2, t is the thickness of the wafer in mm, D is the deflection in mm, and x and y are dimensions represented in the figure. The maximum bending stress (σmax) in N/mm2 is:
where F is the mechanical force.
The literature shows that a 100 μm (approximately 4 mil or 4/1000 inch) silicon substrate is very flexible and will easily bow. A glass substrate has similar characteristics. Flexible substrates are typically thin. However, thicker substrates are desirable for some applications. Two approaches with respect to the competing demands of a thicker substrate and a flexible substrate are provided below. In one approach, a semiconductor membrane is bonded to a thin flexible substrate such as illustrated in
The bonded wafers can be heated to further bond the membrane 903 to the substrate wafer 919 and to cut the membrane 903 from the sacrificial wafer 905. In various embodiments, the bonding temperature is within a range of approximately 300° C. to 400° C. Heating the sacrificial wafer joins the cavities in the cleavage plane 908, allowing the remaining portion 909 of the sacrificial wafer to be removed from the membrane 903, which remains bonded to the substrate wafer 919. The remaining portion 909 of the sacrificial wafer 905 can be prepared and conditioned for another bond-cut process.
With reference to
Cellular materials provide interesting combinations of physical and mechanical properties. The substrate is referred to in this discussion as a flat panel.
The relationship between the stiffness (S) of a flat panel, the Young's modulus (E) of the panel material (representing the ability of the panel material to resist elastic strain), and the thickness (h) of the panel can be represented by:
S∝E×h3. (6)
Cellular material that has imperfections such as the lack of uniformity and closure of the voids can be characterized by the following experimentally-found exponential relationship between the Young's modulus (E) and density (ρ).
E∝ρ2. (7)
Substituting Equation No. 7 for E in Equation No. 6 results in Equation No. 8.
S∝ρ2×h3. (8)
The following observations can be made for panels constructed of imperfect cellular material (i.e. material with nonuniform voids and/or lack of closure of voids). For a panel of a given footprint area and height, constructing the panel using imperfect cellular material half as dense (ρ/2) results in a panel that one fourth as stiff (S/4). Thus, imperfect cellular material provides certain benefits related to flexibility.
A perfect cellular material with uniform and closed voids is expected to provide a linear relationship between the Young's modulus (E) and the density (ρ), as represented by Equation No. 9.
E∝ρ. (9)
Substituting Equation No. 9 for E in Equation No. 6 results in Equation No. 10.
S∝ρ×h3. (10)
The following observation can be made for panels constructed of material that approaches a perfect or ideal cellular material (material with uniform voids and closure of voids). For a panel of a given footprint area and height, constructing the panel using perfect cellular material half as dense (ρ/2) is expected to result in a panel that is half as stiff (S/2).
Various embodiments provide a flexible material with a precisely-determined arrangement of voids (also referred to herein as empty spaces) using a surface transformation process. The substrate in which the voids are formed has a well-defined melting temperature. The substrate is annealed in a temperature range below and near the melting temperature to transform a predetermined arrangement of holes through a surface of the substrate into the desired predetermined arrangement of voids. The substrate is capable of being engineered for various structural and mechanical applications.
The uniformity, density, and space symmetry of the substrate is precisely determined by controlling the diameter, depth and position of an initial arrangement of cylindrical holes formed through a surface of a solid. In various embodiments, the holes have a generally-elongated shape extending into the volume away from the surface. In various embodiments, the holes have a generally cylindrical shape. The present subject matter is not so limited, however. In various embodiments, the precisely-controlled position of the voids is designed to provide a perfect cellular material, an imperfect cellular material, or somewhere between a perfect and imperfect cellular material such that the stiffness is between that provided in Equations 8 and 10. In various embodiments, the precisely-determined arrangement of voids provides the cellular material with an anisotropic stiffness.
When a solid is heated to a higher temperature, a solid with a hole that is beyond a critical length (λc) becomes unstable. For the purposes of the analysis provided below and to simplify the disclosure, the holes are referred to as cylindrical holes. However, various embodiments perform a surface transformation process using holes that are not geometrically cylindrical.
The cylindrical hole is transformed into one or more empty spheres formed along the cylinder axis. The number (N) of spheres formed depends on the length (L) and radius (RC) of the cylinder. Two models of diffusion are the surface diffusion model and the pure volume diffusion model. With respect to the surface diffusion model, for example, the relation between the cylinder length (L), cylinder radius (RC), and number of spheres (N) is expressed by the following equation:
8.89×RC×N≦L<8.89×RC×(N+1). (11)
Equation 11 predicts that no empty spheres will form if L<8.89×RC. Each empty sphere that forms has a radius (RS) expressed by the following equation:
RS=1.88×RC. (12)
If the cylinder has sufficient length L to form two spheres, the center-to-center spacing between the spheres corresponds to the critical length (λC) and is provided by the equation:
λC=8.89×RC. (13)
The pure volume diffusion model provides similar results, with slightly different constants. For example, depending on the exact magnitude of the diffusion parameters, λC can vary from 9.02×RC to 12.96×RC. The diffusion model is capable of being determined by experiment. The remainder of this disclosure uses the surface diffusion model. One of ordinary skill in the art will understand, upon reading and comprehending this disclosure, how to apply this disclosure to another diffusion model.
Various shaped empty spaces or voids such as sphere-shaped voids, pipe-shaped voids, and plate-shaped voids are capable of being formed under the surface of a substrate with a well-defined melting temperature. The shape of the empty spaces formed during the annealing conditions depends on the size, number and spacing of the cylindrical holes that are initially formed at a lower temperature.
Various predetermined arrangements of empty spaces or voids are capable of being formed under the surface of a substrate with a well-defined melting temperature. For example, an appropriately-sized deep trench in a material with a well-defined melting temperature is transformed into empty spheres along the axis of the original trench at an annealing temperature within a predetermined a range below the melting temperature. The empty spheres are uniformly sized and spaced. Other predetermined arrangements are provided below.
In order to form a single sphere, which holds true for forming a single pipe (
In order for single surface-transformed spheres to combine with other surface-transformed spheres, the center-to-center spacing (DNT) between the initial cylindrical holes will satisfy the following equation:
2×RC<DNT<3.76×RC. (14)
Satisfying this equation prevents the adjacent initial cylindrical holes from touching, yet allows the adjacent surface-transformed spheres to combine and form pipe and plate empty spaces, as shown in
Various embodiments disclosed herein form a flexible cellular substrate using surface transformation. In various embodiments, the present subject matter forms a precisely-determined arrangement of voids using surface transformation to provide a cellular material with a relationship between stiffness (S) and density (ρ) approaching that of a perfect cellular material (S∝ρ×h3). In various embodiments, a precisely-determined arrangement of voids is formed using to provide a substrate with a desired anisotropic stiffness.
The size, shape and spacing of empty spaces is controlled by the diameter, depth and spacing of holes (or trenches) initially formed in a substrate that has a defined melting temperature. Empty spaces or voids are formed after annealing the material in a temperature range below and near the defined melting temperature. The empty spaces or voids are capable of being formed with a spherical shape, a pipe shape, plate shape, various combinations of these shape types, and/or various dimensions for the various shape type and combinations of shape type.
The volume of air incorporated in the surface transformed empty spaces is equal to the volume of air within the initial starting pattern of cylindrical holes. Thus, the surface transformed empty spaces do not cause additional stress in the substrate or a tendency for the substrate to crack.
The surface of the substrate will be smooth after the surface transformed empty spaces are formed if the initial cylinder length (L) is equal to an integer of a critical length (λc) such as 1×λc to form one sphere, 2×λc to form two spheres, 3×λc to form three spheres, etc. If the cylinder length (L) is not equal to an integer of a critical length (λc) then the surface of the substrate will have dimples caused by air in the cylinder attributable to the length beyond an integer of a critical length (λc). That is, for a given length L and λc, the number of spheres formed is the integer of L/λc, and the remainder of L/λc contributes to the dimples on the surface of the substrate. Dimples formed on the surface can be removed using a polishing process, for example.
In various embodiments of the present subject matter, the cellular substrate is formed by appropriately spacing the holes such that, upon annealing the material to provide the surface transformation process, the voids are uniformly spaced (or approximately uniformly spaced) throughout the volume of the cellular material. The uniformly spaced voids provide the cellular material with a uniform density from a macroscopic level and a uniform flexibility across a wafer.
In various embodiments, it is desirable to provide a cellular substrate with a very low density within appropriate constraints for the ability to withstand various strain forces.
4. Bond Relaxed Ultra-Thin Semiconductor Membrane with Bowed Shape to Rigid Substrate
5. Bond Single Crystal Wafer with Relaxed Concave Surface to Rigid Substrate
6. Methods of Straining a Semiconductor Layer at a Wafer Scale
7. Transistor
8. Systems
The memory array 2461 includes a number of memory cells 2464. The memory cells in the array are arranged in rows and columns. In various embodiments, word lines 2465 connect the memory cells in the rows, and bit lines 2466 connect the memory cells in the columns. The read/write control circuitry 2462 includes word line select circuitry 2467, which functions to select a desired row. The read/write control circuitry 2462 further includes bit line select circuitry 2468, which functions to select a desired column.
The illustration of the system 2570 is intended to provide a general understanding of one application for the structure and circuitry, and is not intended to serve as a complete description of all the elements and features of an electronic system according to the various embodiments of the present invention. As one of ordinary skill in the art will understand, such an electronic system can be fabricated in single-package processing units, or even on a single semiconductor chip, in order to reduce the communication time between the processor and the memory device.
Applications containing memory cells as described in this disclosure include electronic systems for use in memory modules, device drivers, power modules, communication modems, processor modules, and application-specific modules, and may include multilayer, multichip modules. Such circuitry can further be a subcomponent of a variety of electronic systems.
Various embodiments disclosed herein provide strained semiconductor layers by mechanically stretching a semiconductor layer during full wafer-bonding. This disclosure includes several processes, circuit diagrams, and structures. The present invention is not limited to a particular process order or logical arrangement. Although specific embodiments have been illustrated and described herein, it will be appreciated by those of ordinary skill in the art that any arrangement which is calculated to achieve the same purpose may be substituted for the specific embodiments shown. This application is intended to cover adaptations or variations. It is to be understood that the above description is intended to be illustrative, and not restrictive. Combinations of the above embodiments, and other embodiments, will be apparent to those of skill in the art upon reviewing the above description. The scope of the present invention should be determined with reference to the appended claims, along with the full scope of equivalents to which such claims are entitled.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4241359 | Izumi et al. | Dec 1980 | A |
4314595 | Yamamoto et al. | Feb 1982 | A |
4589928 | Dalton et al. | May 1986 | A |
5234535 | Beyer et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5426061 | Sopori | Jun 1995 | A |
5441591 | Imthurn et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5661044 | Holland et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5679475 | Yamagata et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5840590 | Myers, Jr. et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5858819 | Miyasaka | Jan 1999 | A |
5877070 | Goesele et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5879996 | Forbes | Mar 1999 | A |
5963817 | Chu et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6022793 | Wijaranakula et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6083324 | Henley et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6093623 | Forbes | Jul 2000 | A |
6096433 | Kikuchi et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6103598 | Yamagata et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6107661 | Okabe et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6136666 | So | Oct 2000 | A |
6143628 | Sato et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6174784 | Forbes | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6204145 | Noble | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6228694 | Doyle et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6251751 | Chu et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6261876 | Crowder et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6309950 | Forbes | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6315826 | Muramatsu | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6328796 | Kub et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6338805 | Anderson | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6339011 | Gonzalez et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6377070 | Forbes | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6383924 | Farrar et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6424001 | Forbes et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6448601 | Forbes et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6455397 | Belford | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6461933 | Houston | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6478883 | Tamatsuka et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6486008 | Lee | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6496034 | Forbes et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6497763 | Kub et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6514836 | Belford | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6515335 | Christiansen et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6531727 | Forbes et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6538330 | Forbes | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6541356 | Fogel et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6559491 | Forbes et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6566682 | Forbes | May 2003 | B2 |
6582512 | Geusic et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6583437 | Mizuno et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6597203 | Forbes | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6649476 | Forbes | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6649492 | Chu et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6657276 | Karlsson et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6689671 | Yu et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6703293 | Tweet et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6703648 | Xiang et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6717216 | Doris et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6740913 | Doyle et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6825102 | Bedell et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6855649 | Christiansen et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6900094 | Hammond et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6902616 | Yamazaki et al. | Jun 2005 | B1 |
6987037 | Forbes | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6994762 | Clingman et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7008854 | Forbes | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7023051 | Forbes | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7041575 | Forbes | May 2006 | B2 |
7045874 | Forbes | May 2006 | B2 |
7054532 | Forbes et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7081395 | Chi et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7084429 | Forbes | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7115480 | Forbes | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7198974 | Forbes | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7202530 | Forbes | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7220656 | Forbes | May 2007 | B2 |
7262428 | Forbes | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7271445 | Forbes | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7273788 | Forbes | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7368790 | Forbes | May 2008 | B2 |
20020001965 | Forbes | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020070421 | Ashburn | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020185686 | Christiansen et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030131782 | Geusic et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030181018 | Geusic et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030227072 | Forbes | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040048450 | Tweet et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040171196 | Walitzki | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040173798 | Forbes | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040176483 | Geusic | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040214366 | Segal et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040217352 | Forbes | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040217391 | Forbes | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040224480 | Forbes | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040232487 | Forbes | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040232488 | Forbes | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050023529 | Forbes | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050023612 | Forbes | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050023616 | Forbes | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050029619 | Forbes | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050032296 | Forbes | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050070036 | Geusic et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050087842 | Forbes | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050105869 | Forbes et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050250274 | Forbes et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050285139 | Forbes | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060001094 | Forbes | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060011982 | Forbes | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060097281 | Forbes | May 2006 | A1 |
20060138708 | Geusic | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060208343 | Forbes | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060244105 | Forbes et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060263994 | Forbes | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070096193 | Forbes | May 2007 | A1 |
20070164361 | Forbes | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20080029840 | Forbes et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
54-152464 | Nov 1979 | JP |
54-155770 | Dec 1979 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050020094 A1 | Jan 2005 | US |