The present invention relates generally to a mobile communication system and more particularly, to a mobile communication system using a stratospheric platform and a gateway station that forms the multiple beams on the ground.
In this communication age, content providers are increasingly investigating ways in which to provide more content to users as well as interfacing with users.
Communication satellites have become commonplace for use in many types of communication services, e.g., data transfer, voice communications, television spot beam coverage, and other data transfer applications. As such, “bent pipe” satellites transmit and receive large amounts of signals used or “multiple spot beam” configuration to transmit signals to desired geographic locations on the earth. Mobile applications such as telephones and personal digital applications are becoming increasingly popular.
All of these current mobile satellite communication systems, however, suffer from a variety of disadvantages. First, they all have limited frequency resources. Any given frequency over a given ground position can only be utilized by one user with mobile handset at a time. This is true regardless of the sophistication of the system, including systems that utilize multiple beam satellite designs. Even when multiple satellites are available at a given geographic location, the same frequency spectrum cannot be used by more than one nearby mobile handset user. The availability of multiple satellites merely serves to increase the availability of the system to that mobile handset user who is assigned the specific frequency spectrum. However, the total capacity of these mobile communication satellite systems is still limited by the inefficient usage of the frequency spectrum. Thus, the potential growth of these current satellite communication systems is inherently limited.
Additionally, current telecommunications systems only allow mobile-to-hub and hub-to-mobile communications in most of the low earth orbit nd medium earth orbit mobile satellite constellations. Mobile-to-mobile linkages require multiple hops between hubs. Thus, one user with a mobile handset utilizes a satellite at a frequency slot to communicate to his counterpart on the network. Other satellites on or in the same region cannot reuse the same frequency slot for other nearby handset users. Thus, if a secondary user nearby has a handset that requires a particular frequency, which is being utilized by the first user nearby, the second user is unable to access the system through the same frequency via different satellites.
As described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,903,549, satellites may use a phased array antenna to communicate with users on the ground. The phased array antenna is comprised of a plurality of elements that are used to form a beam. The beam forming is implemented by adjusting the amplitude and phase of each signal path routed to each feed element. Each individual signal path is routed to multiple feeds with relative amplitudes and phases, which define each intended beam. In the '549 patent, the beam forming has been removed from the satellite and is performed on the ground. This reduces the complexity of the payload of the satellite.
Implementing a mobile communication system using a satellite is relatively expensive due to the typical complexity of the satellite payload and the expense of launch. The satellites also use a relatively low gain antenna, which is sometimes inadequate for third generation (3-G) cellular type systems. Because of the complexity, the satellites cannot be deployed quickly and thus, from a business standpoint, marketshare may be lost. Also, as new technology develops, the satellite must be replaced which is also very expensive.
The “bandwidth density” over a populate area from a mobile satellite system is limited. It is not cost effective to form multiple beams with beam-widths on the order of 10 Km or less at S-band from satellites. The required aperture is about 1 Km in diameter from a geo-stationary satellite, and hundreds of meters on MEO satellites. However, we can design mobile system using similar techniques but on stratospheric platforms to improve “projected bandwidth density” by thousands of folds.
One limiting factor to the number of users of a system is interference between the various beams. To reduce interference, commonly either the number of users is reduced or the antenna aperture is increased. Maximizing users is a desirable goal. Also, increasing the antenna aperture increases the spacecraft weight which is undesirable.
It would therefore be desirable to provide a mobile communication system that is capable of rapid deployment, is easy to change should the technology inevitably change and reduces the amount of interference with adjacent beams to permit high throughput.
It is therefore an object of the invention to provide a mobile communication system that allows rapid deployment and provides adaptive interference rejection, in that the interference may be readily changed as conditions change. It is a further object of the invention to provide a stratospheric platform based mobile communication system.
In one aspect of the invention, a communication system has a stratospheric platform with a payload controller and a phased array antenna having a plurality of elements. A gateway station communicates with the stratospheric platform. The gateway station scales the plurality of elements to form a reconfigurable plurality of beams. The gateway station communicates an embedded control signal to the stratospheric platform to communicate a scaling of elements having adaptive interference rejection.
In a further aspect of the invention, a method of controlling a communication system having a stratospheric platform with a phased array antenna having a plurality of elements, comprises the steps of:
One advantage of the invention is that due to the interference detection, system throughput is increased over conventional systems.
Another advantage of the invention is that the payload weight and power consumption are significantly reduced without impacting system performance. The whole beam forming and traffic switching or routing mechanisms, normally on board the platform, have been moved to ground, taking advantage of the unique “spoke and hub” communications traffic topology.
Other features and advantages of the present invention using digital beam forming on ground are readily apparent from the follow ing detailed description of the best mode for carrying out the invention when taken in connection with the accompanying drawings.
In the following description, the same reference numerals are used to identify the same components in the various views. Those skilled in the art will recognize that various other embodiments, structural changes and changes in measures may be made without departing from the scope of the invention.
Referring now to
Communication system 10 further includes a gateway station 20 that is coupled to terrestrial networks 22. Communication system may also include a platform operations center 24. Both gateway station 20 and platform operations center 24 are in communication with stratospheric platform 18. Gateway station 20 provides a link between user terminals 16F, 16M and terrestrial networks 22 through stratospheric platforms 18. Platform operation center 24 provides command and control functions to communications platform 18. Although illustrated as two separate units, gateway station 20 and platform operation center 24 may be combined into the same physical location.
The communication signals between stratospheric platform 18 and user terminals 16M and 16F may be referred to as user links 26. User links 26 represent the transmit and receive beams from both categories of user terminals 16F, 16M and high altitude communications platform 18. A feeder link 28 is defined between high altitude communications platform 18 and gateway station 20.
High altitude communications platform 18 is preferably a stratosphere-based platform such as those under development by AeroVironment. Helios is one such project being developed by AeroVirornment and is an unmanned vehicle that can fly for several months at an altitude of over 60,000 feet above the earth. Helios is a solar-powered, electric plane that is modular in design and may be configured in a variety of ways. The stratospheric platform is operated through the platform operations center 24 to fly in a small radius flight path over a given spot on the earth. As far as users are concerned, the platform is geo-stationary. In addition to a plane-like platform, the stratospheric platform may comprise a balloon or blimp-like platforms.
Stratospheric platform 18 is used as a communication node for gateway station 20 and user terminals 16F and 16M, each of which have an antennas that are pointed in the direction of the high altitude communications platform 18. As will be described below, the pointing from mobile terminals 16M may be performed electronically. Although only one gateway station 20 is illustrated in the figure, those skilled in the art would recognize that various numbers of gateway stations may be employed. As would be further described below, gateway is station 20 with a high gain antenna that has a narrow beam width. The antenna may need a tracking mechanism with tracking speed adequate enough to maintain a communication link with the platform 18 throughout the flight path. Gateway station 20 may be coupled to terrestrial networks 22 such as the public service telephone network, the Internet, or an intranet. Gateway station 20 has communications processing facility 23 that controls the communication with the high altitude communications platform 18.
High altitude communication platform 18 has a payload 30 that links with user terminal 16M, 16F through the use of a phased array antenna and gateway station 20 with a feeder link antenna (preferably a parabolic dish) described below. In the present example, the payload 30 is used to generate a plurality of user beams configured according to the signals as determined in the gateway station 20.
Referring now to
The digital beam former circuit 42 forms a plurality of element signals of element1 through elementn. The element signals are coupled to code division multiplexers/demultiplexer 44. The bundled element control signals are then provided to an RF subsystem 46 that is used to transmit the aggregated signals through feeder antenna 48 to the high altitude communication platform 18. The platform 18 has an antenna 50 used to receive the aggregated element-signals from the gateway station 20. The feeder link antenna 50 is coupled to an RF subsystem 52 that processes the received signals in a conventional manner, including amplification, filtering and frequency down conversion. The RF subsystem 52 is coupled to code division multiplexer/demultiplexer 54 that separates the aggregated signals to individual element signals; the signals of element1 to that of elementn. The demultiplexer 54 has regenerated all the element signals developed by digital beam former circuit 42 on ground as discussed above. The regenerated element signals are sent to RF feeds 56, that provide the signals to the radiating aperture 58 of the phased array antenna 60. There are no phase shifters in the array. The element phasings for each beam are implemented in the digital beam former on ground and are embedded in the signal overall structure. All user signals will be transmitted simultaneously through the aperture. Thus, a user (user A) signal radiated from various elements will ultimately be added coherently in the designated direction (say, direction A) in far field, while other user signals designated for other directions will be added randomly in direction A. Similarly, in the far field along direction B, signals designated for other users at the same frequency band but designated for different directions will be added non-coherently.
Those skilled in the art would recognize that the ground processing facility 23 and payload 30 are also used for receiving signals from the users. Such systems operate in a reverse manner from that described above and therefore is not repeated.
Referring now to
As illustrated best in
E1=E11+E12
E2=E21+E22
Eij is the receive signal in the i-th channel from the j-th user, ij=1,2. Both E11 and E22 are the desired signals from the mainlobe of the antenna. E12 and E21 are interference signals coming from side lobe of the antenna from the other user. E11 and E21 are identical except for a complex constant C21 since they are both found in user1. So that:
E21=C21*E11, and
E12=C12*E22
The adaptive beam processor 72 extracts two output signals E1′ and E2′ from the input E1 and E2 as follows:
The magnitude of C12 and C21 are approximately the ratio of the side lobe level relative to the mainlobe level of the beam. That is, C12 and C21 are small. For example, in a −20 dB side lobe level antenna design, the C12 and C21 would be approximately 0.1. Of course, the exact number depends on the user location and the transmitted power. However, because C12 and C21 are very small fractions, the product C12*C21 is also very substantially smaller than one and therefore, the output E1′ is a better approximation than E1 to the signal E11. Similarly,
By using the user position files 74, the numbers for C12 and C21 can be estimated by correlating the user positions to the antenna radiation pattern. Thus, the interference of the adjacent beams may be compensated for at the output of adaptive beam processor. In a similar manner, each of the interference of each of the beams may be compensated for in the adaptive beam processor in a similar manner.
While the best modes for carrying out the invention have been described in detail, those familiar with the art to which this invention relates will recognize various alternative designs and embodiments for practicing the invention as defined by the following claims.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3541553 | Gubin | Nov 1970 | A |
| 3720953 | Ajioka | Mar 1973 | A |
| 4085368 | Yeh | Apr 1978 | A |
| 4236161 | Ohm | Nov 1980 | A |
| 4343005 | Han et al. | Aug 1982 | A |
| 4555782 | Alaria et al. | Nov 1985 | A |
| 4635063 | Chang et al. | Jan 1987 | A |
| 4689625 | Barmat | Aug 1987 | A |
| 4722083 | Tirro et al. | Jan 1988 | A |
| 4727503 | McWhirter | Feb 1988 | A |
| 4799065 | Thompson | Jan 1989 | A |
| 4819227 | Rosen | Apr 1989 | A |
| 4823341 | Rosen | Apr 1989 | A |
| 5017927 | Agrawal et al. | May 1991 | A |
| 5077562 | Chang et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
| 5081464 | Renshaw | Jan 1992 | A |
| 5151706 | Roederer et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
| 5218619 | Dent | Jun 1993 | A |
| 5339330 | Mallinckrodt | Aug 1994 | A |
| 5365239 | Stilwell, Jr. | Nov 1994 | A |
| 5408237 | Patterson et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
| 5550809 | Bottomley et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
| 5555257 | Dent | Sep 1996 | A |
| 5555444 | Diekelman et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
| 5572216 | Weinberg et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
| 5584047 | Tuck | Dec 1996 | A |
| 5589834 | Weinberg et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
| 5594941 | Dent | Jan 1997 | A |
| 5612701 | Diekelman | Mar 1997 | A |
| 5617410 | Matsumoto | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5625640 | Palmer et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5715516 | Howard et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
| 5732351 | Olds et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5734982 | Endo et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5754139 | Turcotte et al. | May 1998 | A |
| 5764187 | Rudish et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5790070 | Natarajan et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5810284 | Hibbs et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5825325 | O'Donovan et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5856804 | Turcotte et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
| 5862480 | Wild et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
| 5890067 | Chang et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5894590 | Vatt et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
| 5903549 | Von der Embse et al. | May 1999 | A |
| 5907816 | Newman et al. | May 1999 | A |
| 5909460 | Dent | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5909470 | Barratt et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5917447 | Wang et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5937332 | Karabinis | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5946625 | Hassan et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5949766 | Ibanez-Meier et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5963862 | Adiwoso et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5966371 | Sherman | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5973647 | Barrett et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5974317 | Djuknic et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5982337 | Newman et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5991329 | Lomp et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 6016124 | Lo et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
| 6016421 | Weiss et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
| 6018316 | Rudish et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
| 6020845 | Weinberg et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6023463 | Wiedeman et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6032041 | Wainfan et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6047186 | Yu et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6058308 | Kallin et al. | May 2000 | A |
| 6061562 | Martin et al. | May 2000 | A |
| 6072986 | Blanchard et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6088341 | Hinedi et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6111542 | Day et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6147658 | Higashi et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6151308 | Ibanez-Meier et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6157621 | Brown et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6157811 | Dent | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6160994 | Wiedeman | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6167263 | Campbell | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6173178 | Hammill et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6188896 | Perahia et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6195037 | Gross et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6236834 | Poskett et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6240072 | Lo et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6272317 | Houston et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6289004 | Mesecher et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6308085 | Shoki | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6317412 | Natali et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6324398 | Lanzerotti et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6324405 | Young et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6339611 | Antonio et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
| 6339708 | Wang | Jan 2002 | B1 |
| 6343205 | Threadgill et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
| 6366256 | Ramanujam et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6374080 | Uchida | Apr 2002 | B2 |
| 6377802 | McKenna et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6380893 | Chang et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6388615 | Chang et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6388634 | Ramanujam et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6392611 | Smith et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6408180 | McKenna et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6414646 | Luh | Jul 2002 | B2 |
| 6429823 | Bains et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6434384 | Norin et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6452962 | Linsky et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6456846 | Norin et al. | Sep 2002 | B2 |
| 6463282 | Norin et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
| 6463294 | Holma et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6507314 | Chang et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
| 6507739 | Gross et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
| 6513758 | Lloyd | Feb 2003 | B1 |
| 6526288 | Khalifa et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
| 6556845 | Ide et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6559797 | Chang | May 2003 | B1 |
| 6567052 | Wang et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
| 6598014 | Rabideau et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
| 6615024 | Boros et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
| 20010004604 | Toshimitsu et al. | Jun 2001 | A1 |
| 20010038342 | Foote | Nov 2001 | A1 |
| 20010048389 | Nakagawa | Dec 2001 | A1 |
| 20020006795 | Norin | Jan 2002 | A1 |
| 20020072361 | Knoblach et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20020106041 | Chang et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020126042 | Chang et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20020128044 | Chang et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20020128045 | Chang et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20020132643 | Chang et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20020140602 | Chang et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020168991 | Kochanski et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
| 20030076258 | Chang et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 0 549 220 | Jun 1993 | EP |
| 0776 099 | May 1997 | EP |
| 0 860 952 | Aug 1998 | EP |
| 0 961 416 | Dec 1999 | EP |
| 1 026 778 | Aug 2000 | EP |
| 1 139 583 | Oct 2001 | EP |
| 1 148 662 | Oct 2001 | EP |
| 1 152 552 | Nov 2001 | EP |
| 1 158 698 | Nov 2001 | EP |
| 1 161 001 | Dec 2001 | EP |
| 2 349 045 | Oct 2000 | GB |
| 2001345747 | Dec 2001 | JP |
| WO 9504407 | Feb 1995 | WO |
| WO 9631016 | Oct 1996 | WO |
| WO 97 07609 | Feb 1997 | WO |
| WO 9851568 | Nov 1998 | WO |
| WO 9913598 | Mar 1999 | WO |
| WO 9923769 | May 1999 | WO |
| WO 0014902 | Mar 2000 | WO |
| WO 0193458 | Dec 2001 | WO |
| WO 0195220 | Dec 2001 | WO |
| WO 0195523 | Dec 2001 | WO |
| WO 0197388 | Dec 2001 | WO |
| WO 0197406 | Dec 2001 | WO |
| WO 02058186 | Jul 2002 | WO |
| WO 02058272 | Jul 2002 | WO |
| WO 02058273 | Jul 2002 | WO |