STRAWBERRY PLANT NAMED 'DRISSTRAWTHREE'

Information

  • Patent Application
  • 20080320625
  • Publication Number
    20080320625
  • Date Filed
    June 21, 2007
    17 years ago
  • Date Published
    December 25, 2008
    15 years ago
  • US Classifications
  • International Classifications
    • A01H5/00
Abstract
This invention relates to a new and distinct cultivar of strawberry plant named ‘DrisStrawThree’. The new cultivar is primarily characterized by its large fruit size, heavy fruit production, and resistance to powdery mildew.
Description
GENUS AND SPECIES


Fragaria×ananassa


VARIETY DENOMINATION

‘DrisStrawThree’


BACKGROUND OF THE NEW PLANT

The present invention relates to a new and distinct strawberry cultivar designated ‘DrisStrawThree’ and botanically known as Fragaria×ananassa. This new strawberry cultivar was discovered in October, 2002 and originated from a cross between the female parent ‘5F205’, a proprietary strawberry plant (unpatented) and the male parent ‘San Juan’ (U.S. Plant Pat. No. 12,899). The original seedling of the new cultivar was asexually propagated at a nursery in Shasta County, California. ‘DrisStrawThree’ was subsequently asexually propagated and underwent further testing at a nursery in Ventura County, California for four years. The present invention has been found to retain its distinctive characteristics through successive asexual propagations.




DESCRIPTION OF THE PHOTOGRAPHS

The accompanying color photographs show typical specimens of the new cultivar at various stages of development as nearly true as it is possible to make in color reproductions.



FIG. 1 shows overall plant habit including fruit at various stages of development.



FIG. 2 shows leaves of the plant with three leaflets.



FIG. 3 shows both the upperside and underside of several of the flowers.



FIG. 4 shows the whole fruit.



FIG. 5 shows the fruit in longitudinal cross-section.




DESCRIPTION OF THE NEW CULTIVAR

The following description of ‘DrisStrawThree’ is based on observations taken from the 2002 to 2006 growing seasons in Ventura County, California. This description is in accordance with UPOV terminology. Color designations, color descriptions, and other phenotypical descriptions may deviate from the stated values and descriptions depending upon variation in environmental, seasonal, climatic and cultural conditions. ‘DrisStrawThree’ has not been observed under all possible environmental conditions. Color terminology follows The Royal Horticultural Society Colour Chart, London (R.H.S.) (2001).


DETAILED BOTANICAL DESCRIPTION

Table 1 shows plant characteristics of the new variety compared with plant characteristics of the parent ‘San Juan’. Plant characteristics include plant height, leaf shape in cross section, fruit hollow center, fruit texture when tasted, and reaction to aphids.

TABLE 1Characteristic‘DrisStrawThree’‘San Juan’Plant height (cm)20.528.0Leaf shape inSlightly concaveFlat to slightlycrossconvexFruit hollow centerSmallMediumFruit texture whenVery fineMediumtastedAphis spp.ModeratelySusceptible(Aphids)resistant


Table 2 shows plant characteristics of the new variety compared with plant characteristics of the commercial varieties, ‘Driscoll Camarillo’ (U.S. Plant Pat. No. 14,771) and ‘Baeza’ (U.S. Plant Pat. No. 11,548). Plant characteristics include plant height, diameter, number of crowns per plant, habit, density of individual plant and vigor.

TABLE 2‘DriscollCharacteristic‘DrisStrawThree’Camarillo’‘Baeza’Plant height (cm)20.523.322.4Plant diameter45.143.944.7(cm)Number of433crowns/plantHabitFlat globoseGloboseGloboseDensity ofDenseMedium toMedium toindividual plantDenseDenseVigorStrongStrongMedium


Table 3 shows leaf characteristics of the new cultivar compared with leaf characteristics of ‘Driscoll Camarillo’ and ‘Baeza’. Leaf characteristics include terminal leaflet length and width in centimeters, length to width ratio, number of teeth per terminal leaflet, shape of teeth, color of upperside and underside of leaf, leaf shape in cross section, leaf blistering, leaf glossiness, number of leaflets, leaflet margin, and shape of leaf base.

TABLE 3‘DriscolLeaf Characteristic‘DrisStrawThree’Camarillo’‘Baeza’Terminal leaflet0.820.900.83length (cm)Terminal leaflet0.800.970.91width (cm)Terminal leaflet1.040.930.91length/width ratioNo. teeth/terminal172729leafletShape of teethRoundedRoundedRoundedColor of uppersideRHS 139ARHS N189BRHS 147Aof leafColor of undersideRHS 191BRHS 137CRHS 137Cof leafLeaf shape in crossSlightly concaveSlightly concaveConcavesectionLeaf blisteringWeakMediumMediumLeaf glossinessWeakWeakWeakNo. leafletsThree onlyThree onlyThree onlyTerminal leafletRevoluteRevoluteRevolutemarginTerminal leafletObtuseRoundedRoundedbase shape


Table 4 shows information about the petiole, the petiolule, the bract, and the stipule of the new cultivar compared to ‘Driscoll Camarillo’ and ‘Baeza’. This includes petiole length in centimeters, petiole diameter in centimeters, petiolule length in centimeters, petiolule diameter in centimeters, bract frequency per petiole, stipule length in centimeters, stipule width in centimeters, stipule pubescence, petiole pubescence, pose of hairs on the petiole, color of the petiole and color of the petiolule.

TABLE 4Characteristic‘DrisStrawThree’‘Driscoll Camarillo’‘Baeza’Petiole length (cm)14.112.713.4Petiole diameter0.4120.4080.420(cm)PetioleDenseSparseMediumpubescenceto densePetiole pose ofOutward toOutwardsOutwardshairsdownwardPetiole colorRHS 144BRHS 144BRHS 144BPetiolule colorRHS 145BRHS 145BRHS 145BPetiolule length1.0981.2551.456(cm)Petiolule diameter0.2360.2540.232(cm)Bract frequency111Stipule length (cm)3.84.03.7Stipule width (cm)0.9851.0701.256StipuleDenseSparseSparsepubescence


Table 5 shows stolon characteristics of the new cultivar compared to ‘Driscoll Camarillo’ and ‘Baeza’. These characteristics include the number of stolons, the anthocyanin coloration of the stolons, the thickness of the stolons, and the pubescence of the stolons.

TABLE 5‘DriscollCharacteristic‘DrisStrawThree’Camarillo’‘Baeza’Stolon NumberFew to mediumFew to mediumFew tomediumStolon AnthocyaninStrongWeak to mediumWeak tomediumStolon ThicknessMediumThickThick tovery thickStolon PubescenceSparseSparseMediumto dense


Table 6 shows inflorescence characteristics of the new cultivar compared to ‘Driscoll Camarillo’ and ‘Baeza’. These characteristics include inflorescence position relative to foliage, relative flower size, flower diameter in centimeters (measured from petal tip to petal tip), relative spacing of petals, petal length in centimeters, petal width in centimeters, petal length to width ratio, petal color, calyx diameter in centimeters (measured on back of flower from sepal tip to sepal tip), diameter of calyx relative to corolla, diameter of inner calyx relative to outer, sepal length in centimeters (measured from sepal tip to point of attachment to receptacle), sepal width in centimeters, receptacle color and anther color.

TABLE 6‘DriscollCharacteristic‘DrisStrawThree’Camarillo’‘Baeza’Inflorescence positionBeneathAboveAboverelative to foliageFlower sizeMediumMediumMediumFlower diameter (cm)3.0012.2632.490Petal spacingOverlappingOverlappingOverlappingPetal length (cm)1.5021.2621.496Petal width (cm)1.5311.2631.511Petal length/width ratio0.981.000.99Petal colorRHS 155BRHS 155CRHS 155BCalyx diameter (cm)4.0882.5502.925Calyx diameter relativeLargerSmallerSame sizeto corollaInner calyx diameterSame sizeSame sizeSame sizerelative to outerSepal length (cm)1.5820.9641.087Sepal width (cm)0.8170.5440.505Receptacle colorRHS N144ARHS 2BRHS 1AAnther colorRHS 17ARHS 15BRHS 17B


Table 7 shows fruit characteristics of the new cultivar compared to ‘Driscoll Camarillo’ and ‘Baeza’.

TABLE 7‘DriscollCharacteristic‘DrisStrawThree’Camarillo’‘Baeza’Fruiting truss13.426.521.7length (cm)Fruiting trussProstrateErectErectattitudeFruiting truss lengthMediumLongLongFruit length (cm)4.933.764.35Fruit width (cm)4.363.733.92Fruit length/1.131.011.11width ratioFruit weight (g)27.521.022.3Relative fruit sizeVery largeMediumMediumPredominantAlmostConicalConicalfruit shapecylindricalDifference in shapeSlightNone or veryNone orbetween primary &slightvery slightsecondary fruitsBand withoutNarrowAbsent or veryAbsent orachenesnarrowvery narrowUnevenness ofMediumMediumMediumfruit surfaceFruit skin colorRHS 45BRHS 46ARHS 46BRedRedRedEvenness ofUnevenEvenEvenfruit colorFruit glossinessMediumMediumMediumInsertion of achenesLevel withLevel withLevel withsurfacesurfacesurfaceAchene coloration-RHS 165ARHS 166BRHS 163Bsunward side ofRed to purple,Red to purple,Red toberrypossibly greyedpossibly greyedpurple,possiblygreyedAchene coloration-RHS 151C yellowRHS 151CRHS 151Ashaded side of berryto greenyellow to greenYellow toto greenAchenes per berry243.6316.2361.3Achene weight0.0006644090.0005703670.000466731Insertion of calyxSet aboveLevelLevelthe fruitPose of calxReflexedReflexedReflexedsegmentsSize of calyx inSmallerSame sizeSame sizerelation to fruitto largerAdherence of calyxStrongStrongStrongFirmness of fleshFirmFirmFirmColor of the fleshRHS 155ARHS 155ARHS 155A(White) to RHS(White) to RHS(White) to RHS44D (light red)44D (light red)38B (pale rose)Evenness ofSlightly unevenEvenEvenflesh colorDistribution ofMarginal andOnly marginalOnly marginalflesh colorcentralHollow centerSmallAbsentMediumSweetnessStrongMediumMediumAcidityWeakMediumMediumTexture when tastedVery fineMediumMediumTime of floweringEarlyEarlyLateHarvest maturityMid-season, earlyMid-season,LateJune to lateearly June toearly July toDecemberlate Decemberlate DecemberType of bearingFullyFullyFullyeverbearingeverbearingeverbearingGrams of fruit/plant500286289


Table 8 shows the resistance to different forms of stress of the new cultivar compared to ‘Driscoll Camarillo’ and ‘Baeza’. These forms of stress include drought, high temperatures, wind, high pH, and high soil salt level.

TABLE 8Reaction to‘DriscollStress‘DrisStrawThree’Camarillo’‘Baeza’DroughtModeratelyModeratelyModeratelyresistantresistantresistantHighModeratelyModeratelyModeratelytemperaturesresistantresistantresistantWindModeratelyModeratelyModeratelyresistantresistantresistantHigh pHModeratelyModeratelyModeratelyresistantresistantresistantHigh soilModeratelyModeratelySusceptiblesalt levelresistantresistant


Table 9 shows pest and disease characteristics of the new cultivar compared to ‘Driscoll Camarillo’ and ‘Baeza’.

TABLE 9‘DriscollPest or Disease‘DrisStrawThree’Camarillo’‘Baeza’TetranychusModeratelyModeratelyModeratelyurticae (2-spottedresistantresistantresistantspider mite)TarsonemusModeratelyModeratelyModeratelypallidusresistantresistantresistantAphelencoidesModeratelyModeratelyModeratelyfragariaeresistantresistantresistantPratylenchusModeratelyModeratelyModeratelypenetransresistantresistantresistantDitylenchusModeratelyModeratelyModeratelydipsacresistantresistantresistantAnthonomusModeratelyModeratelyModeratelyrubiresistantresistantresistantAphis spp.ModeratelyModeratelyModerately(Aphids)resistantresistantresistantLygus hesperusModeratelyModeratelyModerately(Lygus bug)resistantresistantresistantBotrytisModeratelyModeratelyModeratelyfruit rotSusceptibleSusceptibleSusceptiblePowderyResistantHighlySusceptiblemildewsusceptible

Claims
  • 1. A new and distinct cultivar of strawberry plant as described and shown herein.