Strawberry plant named ‘USDA Lumina’

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • PP36100
  • Patent Number
    PP36,100
  • Date Filed
    Wednesday, September 6, 2023
    2 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, September 10, 2024
    a year ago
  • US Classifications
    Field of Search
    • US
    • PLT 208000
    • CPC
    • A01H5/08
    • A01H5/00
    • A01H6/7409
    • A01H6/74
  • International Classifications
    • A01H5/08
    • A01H6/74
    • Term Extension
      0
Abstract
This invention relates to a new and distinct cultivar of strawberry plant named ‘USDA Lumina’. The new early-season cultivar is primarily characterized by large, bright, glossy, sweet fruits resistant to anthracnose fruit rot.
Description

Latin name of the genus and species of the plant claimed: ‘USDA LUMINA’ is a new strawberry plant that is Fragaria x ananassa Duchesne ex Rozier.


Variety denomination: The new strawberry plant claimed is of the variety denominated ‘USDA Lumina’ Fragaria x ananassa Duchesne ex Rozier.


BACKGROUND OF THE NEW PLANT

The present invention relates to a new and distinct strawberry cultivar designated ‘USDA Lumina’. This new strawberry cultivar was discovered in Beltsville, Maryland, in Spring 2019 and originated from a cross between the female parent B2475 (unpatented) and the male parent B2197 (unpatented). The original seedling of the new cultivar was asexually propagated in Beltsville since 2019 by rooting daughter plants from stolons of the mother plant. The present invention has been found to be stable and reproduce true to type through successive asexual propagations rooting daughter plants from stolons.


BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The cultivar ‘USDA Lumina’ is an early-season strawberry cultivar resistant to anthracnose fruit rot. Fruit yields are higher than other early-season cultivars. It has sweet fruit which are very attractive, brightly colored, glossy, and with uniform symmetry.





DESCRIPTIONS OF THE PHOTOGRAPHS

The accompanying color photographs show typical specimens of the new cultivar at various stages of development as nearly true as it is possible to make color reproductions.



FIG. 1 shows a six-plant plot of ‘USDA Lumina’ during fruiting.



FIG. 2 shows the uniform shape and variation in size of ‘USDA Lumina’ fruit from a single harvest of a six-plant plot.



FIG. 3 shows the glossiness of ‘USDA Lumina’ fruit.





DESCRIPTION OF THE NEW CULTIVAR

The following description of ‘USDA Lumina’ is based on observations taken from 2020 through 2023 growing seasons in in evaluations in Beltsville, Maryland, 2023 USDA Plant Hardiness Zone 7b. This description is in accordance with UPOV terminology. Color designations, color descriptions, and other phenotypical descriptions may deviate from the stated values and descriptions, depending on variation in environmental, seasonal, climatic, and cultural conditions. ‘USDA Lumina’ has not been observed under all possible environmental conditions. The botanical description of ‘USDA Lumina’ was taken from plants nine months after establishment in the field. Color terminology follows The Royal Horticultural Society Colour Chart, London (R.H.S.86).


DETAILED BOTANICAL DESCRIPTION

Table 1 shows selected characteristics of the new cultivar compared with plant characteristics of ‘Earliglow’ (unpatented) and ‘Galletta’ (U.S. Plant Pat. No. 19,763). Characteristics include fruit diameter and length, and the length/width ratio, average fruit weight, sweetness (Brix), acidity (pH and TA), and yield (weight and berry number).












TABLE 1






‘USDA




Characteristic
Lumina’
‘Earliglow’
‘Galletta’







Diameter fruit (cm)
5.0
3.8
4.8


Length fruit (cm)
3.9
3.6
3.6


Ratio fruit length/width
1.3
1.1
1.3


Weight fruit (g)
14.1 
6.9
17.1 


Brix (percent soluble solids)
 9.13
10.87
 8.07


pH
 3.73
 3.67
 3.58


Titratable acidity (TA)
 0.92
 1.01
 0.89


Yield (kg/plant)
 1.00
 0.55
 0.86


Yield (non-decayed berries/plant)
53.9 
73.7 
43.6 









Table 2 shows plant characteristics of the new cultivar compared with plant characteristics of ‘Earliglow’ and ‘Galletta’. Plant characteristics include plant height, diameter, number of crowns per plant, habit, density of individual plants and vigor.












TABLE 2






‘USDA




Characteristic
Lumina’
‘Earliglow’
‘Galletta’







Plant height (cm)
23.5 
20.8 
18.5 


Plant diameter (cm)
46.2 
45.5 
37.7 


Number of crowns
5.3
4.2
2.5


plant





Habit
Upright open
Upright open
Upright open



globose
globose
globose


Density of indi-
Medium to
Medium
Not dense


vidual plant
dense




Vigor
Medium to
Medium to
Medium



strong
strong









Table 3 shows leaf characteristics of the new cultivar compared with leaf characteristics of ‘Earliglow’ and ‘Galletta’. Leaf characteristics include leaf type, leaf shape, leaf length, leaf width, terminal leaflet length, terminal leaflet width, terminal leaflet length to width ratio, leaf margins, shape of teeth, leaf serrations per leaflet, upper and lower leaf surface color, number of leaflets, terminal leaflet apex shape, terminal leaflet base shape, glossiness upper side leaf surface, texture upper side leaf surface, texture underside leaf surface, and leaf arrangement.












TABLE 3






‘USDA




Characteristic
Lumina’
‘Earliglow’
‘Galletta’







Leaf type
Semi-
Semi-
Semi-



evergreen
evergreen
evergreen


Leaf shape
Trifoliolate
Trifoliolate
Trifoliolate



with ovate
with ovate
with ovate



leaflets
leaflets
leaflets



touching
touching
touching



to over-
to over-
to over-



lapping
lapping
lapping


Leaf length (cm)
12.8
15.0
12.9


Leaf width (cm)
16.0
17.3
15.9


Terminal leaflet
8.7
8.8
8.3


length (cm)





Terminal leaflet
6.9
7.8
7.1


width (cm)





Terminal leaflet
1.3
1.1
1.2


length width ratio





Leaf margins
Serrate
Serrate
Serrate


Shape of teeth
Apiculate
Apiculate
Apiculate


Leaf serrations
27.7
26.8
26.3


per leaflet





Color mature
Yellow-Green
Green
Green


leaves upper
Group 146A
Group 137A
Group 137A


surface





Color mature
Yellow-Green
Green
Green


leaves lower
Group 147B
Group 137C
Group 137C


surface





Number of
3
3
3


leaflets





Terminal leaflet
Obtuse
Obtuse
Obtuse


apex shape





Terminal leaflet
Acute cuneate
Acute cuneate
Acute cuneate


base shape





Glossiness upper
Semi-gloss
Semi-gloss
Semi-gloss


side leaf surface





Texture upper
Very slightly
Very slightly
Very slightly


side leaf surface
rugose
rugose
rugose


Texture under-
Very slightly
Very slightly
Very slightly


side leaf surface
reticulate
reticulate
reticulate


Leaf arrange-
Individual tri-
Individual tri-
Individual tri-


ment
foliate leaves
foliate leaves
foliate leaves



attached to
attached to
attached to



compressed
compressed
compressed



stem (crown)
stem (crown)
stem (crown)



at ground
at ground
at ground



level
level
level









Table 4 shows information about the petiole, the petiolule, the bract and the stipule of the new cultivar compared to ‘Farliglow’ and ‘Galletta’. This includes petiole length, petiole diameter, petiole pubescence, petiole color, petiolule color, petiolule length, petiole hair attitude, bract frequency and color, texture petiole, and stipule length, width and color.












TABLE 4





Charac-
‘USDA




teristic
Lumina’
‘Earliglow’
‘Galletta’







Leaf petiole
15.0 
16.9 
12.6 


length (cm)





Petiole dia-
 0.36
 0.32
 0.41


meter (cm)





Petiole tex-
Smooth
Smooth
Smooth


ture





Petiole
Sparse
Very sparse
Moderately


pubescence


dense


Petiole hair
Upwards to
Outwards
Outwards


attitude
outwards




Petiole
Yellow Green
Yellow Green
Yellow Green


color
Group 144A
Group 144B
Group 144B


Petiolule
Yellow Green
Yellow Green
Yellow Green


color
Group 144A
Group 144B
Group 144B


Petiolule
 0.84
 0.52
 0.58


length (cm)





Bract
1 to 2 per
1 to 2 per
1 to 2 per


frequency
florescence,
florescence,
florescence,



generally
generally
generally



unifoliate
unifoliate
unifoliate


Bract color
Yellow Green
Yellow Green
Yellow Green



Group 144A
Group 144B
Group 144B


Stipule
3.6
3.1
2.8


length (cm)





Stipule
 0.59
 0.49
 0.70


width (cm)





Stipule color
Yellow Green
Yellow Green
Yellow Green



Group 144A,
Group 144B,
Group 144B,



Grayish Red
Grayish Red
Grayish Red



Group 182B
Group 182B
Group 182B









Table 5 shows stolon characteristics of the new cultivar compared to ‘Farliglow’ and ‘Galletta’. These characteristics include the number of stolons, the anthocyanin coloration of the stolons, the thickness of the stolons, and the pubescence of the stolons.












TABLE 5






‘USDA




Characteristic
Lumina’
‘Earliglow’
‘Galletta’







Stolon pro-
9.3
2.3
7.7


duction per





plant





Stolon color
Yellow Green
Yellow Green
Yellow Green



Group 144A,
Group 144B,
Group 144B,



Grayish Red
Grayish Red
Grayish Red



Group 182B
Group 182B
Group 182B


Stolon antho-
Medium
Strong
Medium


cyanin





Stolon thick-
 0.27
 0.28
 0.26


ness (cm)





Stolon
Medium
Medium
Medium


pubescence









Table 6 shows inflorescence characteristics of the new cultivar compared to ‘Earliglow’ and ‘Galletta’. These characteristics include inflorescence position relative to foliage, flower type, flower size, petal shape, relative petal spacing, petal apex shape, petal margin, petal base shape, petal length, petal width, petal length/width ratio, number of petals, petal color, Stigma color, style color, anther color, filament color, and flower truss type.












TABLE 6






‘USDA




Characteristic
Lumina’
‘Earliglow’
‘Galletta’







Inflorescence
Slightly below
Level to slightly
Slightly below


position
to level
above
to level


Flower type
Complete
Complete
Complete



simple
simple
simple


Flower dia-
3.1
2.3
1.9


meter (cm)





Petal shape
Circular to
Circular to
Circular to



obovate
obovate
obovate


Petal spacing
Overlapping
Separate to
Overlapping




overlapping



Petal apex shape
Circular
Circular
Circular


Petal margin
Entire
Entire
Entire


Petal base shape
Obovate
Obovate
Obovate


Petal length (cm)
1.16
0.91
0.82


Petal width (cm)
1.14
0.74
0.93


Petal length/
1.02
1.25
0.88


width ratio





Petal count
5.0
5.0
5.2


Petal color
White Group
White Group
White Group



155D
155D
155D


Stigma color
Yellow-Orange
Yellow-Green
Yellow-Orange



Group 20C
Group 150C
Group 18B


Style color
Yellow-Green
Yellow-Green
Yellow-Green



Group 150B
Group 154B
Group 151D


Anther color
Yellow-Orange
Yellow-Orange
Yellow-Orange



Group 20A
Group 21A
Group 21B


Filament color
Yellow-Green
Yellow-Green
Yellow-Green



Group 150C
Group 154C
Group 154D


Anther count
23.6
22.3
24.6


Blooming habit
Cyme
Cyme
Cyme









Table 7 shows fruit characteristics of the new cultivar compared to ‘Earliglow’ and ‘Galletta’. These characteristics include number of berries per truss, fruiting truss attitude, fruit length, fruit diameter, fruit length/width ratio, fruit weight, relative fruit size, predominant fruit shape, difference in shape between primary and secondary fruit, band without achenes, evenness of fruit surface, top color, non-blush side color, blush side color, internal color, achene color, achene count per fruit, insertion of calyx, pose of calyx segments, size of calyx in relation to fruit, ease of calyx removal, firmness of flesh, evenness of flesh color, distribution of flesh color, sweetness, acidity, Brix, pH, titratable acidity, texture when tasted, time of flowering, harvest maturity (50% of plants with ripe fruit), type of bearing, and yield.












TABLE 7






‘USDA




Characteristic
Lumina’
‘Earliglow’
‘Galletta’


















Number of berries
5.0
7.7
5.7


per fruiting truss





Fruiting truss
Prostrate
Prostrate
Prostrate


attitude





Diameter fruit
5.0
3.8
4.8


(cm)





Length fruit (cm)
3.9
3.6
3.6


Ratio fruit length/
1.3
1.1
1.3


width





Weight fruit (g)
14.1
6.9
17.1


Relative fruit size
Medium to
Small
Medium to



Large

Large


Predominant fruit
Ovate to
Conic with
Ovate to


shape
conic
neck
conic


Difference in
None, uni-
None, uni-
Moderate,


shape between
form
form
primaries have


primary and


some ridging


secondary fruits





Band without
Slight
Moderate
None to


achenes


slight


Evenness of fruit
Even to
Slightly
Even to


surface
slightly
uneven
slightly



uneven

uneven


Color of top of
Red Group
Red Group
Red Group


fruit
44A
46B
45A


Blush side color
Red Group
Red Group
Red Group



45A
46A
46A


Non-blush side
Red Group
Red Group
Red Group


color
44B
44A
45A


Internal flesh
Orange-White
White Group
Orange-White


color
Group 159D,
155D, Red
Group 159D,



Red Group
Group 44A
Red Group 44A,



44A, Red

Red Group 44C



Group 44C




Achene position
At surface
At surface
At surface to





slightly raised


Achene color
Red Group
Red Group 46B,
Yellow-Green



45A, Yellow
Yellow-Green
Group 153B,



Group 153A,
Group 152C,
Greyed-Orange



Yellow-Green
Greyed-Orange
Group 166B



Group 152C
Group 166A



Achene count
305
252
304


Insertion of
At surface
Necked
At surface


calyx
to slightly

to necked



necked




Pose of calyx
Reflexed
Reflexed
Reflexed


segments





Size of calyx
Smaller to
Same to
Same to


in relation to
slightly larger
slightly larger
slightly larger


fruit





Ease of calyx
Difficult
Difficult
Difficult


removal





Firmness of
Medium to
Medium
Medium to


flesh
firm

firm


Evenness of
Uneven
Uneven
Uneven


flesh color





Distribution
Red Group 44C
Red Group 44A
Red Group 44C


of flesh color
core, Orange-
core, then White
core, Orange-



White Group
Group 155D halo
White Group



159D halo, area
and radiant lines,
159D area near



near calyx, and
through Red
calyx and radiant



radiant lines,
Group 44A
lines through Red



through Red
outer ring
Group 44A outer



Group 44A

ring



outer ring




Sweetness
Sweet
Very sweet
Mild


Acidity
Mild
Medium
Tart


Brix (percent
9.13
10.87
8.07


soluble solids)





pH
3.73
3.67
3.58


Titratable
0.92
1.01
0.89


acidity (TA)





Texture when
Smooth to
Fine, some-
Fine, some-


tasted
Creamy
what smooth
what smooth,





slightly





gummy


Time of
April to
April to
April to


flowering
May
May
May


Harvest matur-
Mid to late
Mid to late
Mid to late


ity (50% of
May
May
May


plant with





ripe fruit)





Type of
Short Day/
Short Day/
Short Day/


bearing
June Bearing
June Bearing
June Bearing


Yield (non-
53.9
73.7
43.6


decayed berries/





plant)





Yield (kg/plant)
1.00
0.55
0.86









Table 8 shows the fruit quality of the new cultivar compared to ‘Earliglow’ and ‘Galletta’ after one week and two weeks in refrigerated storage. The postharvest fruit quality characteristics include the percentage of stored fruits that are marketable, degraded, or rotted after one week and two weeks in refrigerated storage.











TABLE 8








Percentage marketable
Percentage degraded











Cultivar
Week 1
Week 2
Week 1
Week 2


















‘USDA
91
bcd
53
bc
45
bcd
94
bcd


Lumina’










‘Earliglow’
98
a
51
bc
46
bcd
97
abc


‘Galletta’
95
ab
42
cde
28
d
98
a
















Percentage rotted

















Cultivar
Week 1
Week 2






















‘USDA
2
cde
20
abc






Lumina’










‘Earliglow’
1
e
2
ef






‘Galletta’
1
e
1
f









COMPARISON WITH PARENTAL GENOTYPES

When ‘USDA Lumina’ is compared to female parent, B2475 (unpatented), the fruits have better symmetry and are less susceptible to Botrytis fruit rot. When ‘USDA Lumina’ is compared to male parent, B2197 (unpatented), the fruits a more desirable, less mealy texture and are less susceptible to Botrytis fruit rot.

Claims
  • 1. A new and distinct cultivar of strawberry plant named ‘USDA Lumina’, substantially as described and illustrated herein.
US Referenced Citations (1)
Number Name Date Kind
PP19763 Ballington Feb 2009 P2
Non-Patent Literature Citations (2)
Entry
CPVO OCVV on p. 15, col. 5 at No. 40 retrieved on Feb. 6, 2024 at https://cpvo.europa.eu/sites/default/files/documents/TP/fruits/TP_022-2_Strawberry.pdf, 2009, pp. 1 and 15. (Year: 2009).
International Code of Nomenclature for Cultivated Plants, ISHS Scripta Horticulturae No. 18, Ninth ed. 2016, 2 cover pages and p. 30. (Year: 2016).