The present invention is generally related to the field of stream clock and data recovery in digital communication and, more specifically, to reduction of frequency errors in a high definition multimedia digital content transport system.
A high definition multimedia digital content transport system typically includes a source device, a sink device, and perhaps a number of additional repeaters or other devices, interconnected by a uni-directional, high-speed, and low-latency serial link channel designed to transport isochronous streams such as uncompressed digital video and digital audio. In order to transmit video and audio data across a link channel, a packet structure is used. Frequently in its simplest form, a source includes transcoders which convert incoming video and audio stream data between a non-standard interface and a standard interface, as well as link channel transmitters integrated with graphics, video, and audio processors. A sink includes link channel receivers combined with other display and audio related devices and integration components for higher level functionalities. Recently, a high-definition multimedia interface (HDMI) and DisplayPort for transmitting digital video and audio content have been standardized by Video Electronics Standard Association (VESA).
The task of recreating the video pixel clock rate or the audio sample clock rate at the sink side is called stream clock recovery. There are a variety of stream clock recovery methods that can be implemented at the sink, each method having a different set of performance characteristics. Unfortunately, the clock rate measured at the sink side is not always equal to the original clock rate at the source site and many of the stream clock recovery methods do not provide satisfactory and practical solutions. Accordingly, it is desirable to provide for improved stream clock recovery methods.
Consistent with embodiments of the present invention, a stream clock recovery device is provided. In some embodiments, the clock recovery device includes a video and audio data source containing a transmitter, wherein the data includes a clock signal; a sink device receiving the data from a link channel connecting to the transmitter; the sink device further including: a data extractor to extract the clock data; a data calibrator to recover the clock data; a data translator having a fraction and integer value generator; a phase locked loop (PLL) for synthesizing a fractional frequency; and a sigma-delta-modulator (SDM) for generating a fractional divisor for the PLL by modulating the fractional part of the clock data. In some embodiments, the clock data calibrator can switch between different calibration methods. For example, the recovered clock data can be measured with a cycle time counter and compared with the extracted clock data. Another example method monitors the data buffer filling level periodically.
Some embodiments of the present invention will be described more fully below with reference to the accompanying drawings. This invention may, however, be embodied in many different forms and should not be construed as being limited to the embodiments set forth herein.
In the following description, specific details are set forth describing some embodiments of the present invention. It will be apparent, however, to one skilled in the art that some embodiments may be practiced without some or all of these specific details. The specific embodiments disclosed herein are meant to be illustrative but not limiting. One skilled in the art may realize other material that, although not specifically described here, is within the scope and the spirit of this disclosure.
In many stream clock recovery systems, the video data 111 and audio stream data 112 being carried across the main serial link channel 121 may not retain the original video pixel clock rate or audio sample clock rate. The serial link channel 121 is driven by a high speed clock running at a different rate and not at the original video pixel clock rate or the audio sample clock rate. For example, in the DisplayPort standard, the main serial link channel 121 clock rate is fixed at either 1.62 Gbps or 2.7 Gbps irrespective of the input video or audio clock rate. In the HDMI standard, the main serial link channel 121 clock runs at the TMDS (Transition Minimized Differential Signaling) clock rate which corresponds to the video pixel rate, but is independent of the audio sample clock rate. In both HDMI and DisplayPort standards, a fractional relationship time-stamped clock regeneration model 200 such as that shown in
When M and N values are transported from source 110 to sink 150, the source measures the clock cycle M using a counter 210 running at the link symbol clock frequency (usually 1/10 of channel clock rate). N can be a fixed value defined by the communication standard used, for example, N is set to 32768 (215) in the DisplayPort standard. The value M measured by counter 210 is transported in a serial main link channel 121 as part of a packet structure. The stream clock signals transported by main link channel 121 and link symbol clock signals 203 at source 110 are asynchronous with each other, thus the value M might change while the value N stays constant. The stream clock rate from serial main link channel 121 can be derived from the link symbol clock by using the relationship stream clock rate=M/N*(link symbol clock rate).
There are a variety of stream clock recovery methods that can be implemented at sink 150. Each method has a different set of performance characteristics.
Moreover, SDM 360 shapes the noise spectrum of its output with a high pass filter, which suppresses noise at low frequencies. PLL 370 acts as a low pass filter to reject high frequency response. As a result, the overall noise is attenuated, and the recovered stream clock rate 372 is used to read stream data, which is stored at data buffer 330.
A problem occurs for the above stream clock recovery method, when the M & N values at sink 150 are not equal to the original M & N values at the source, which is typically caused by bit error in link channel 121 or imperfect measurement mechanisms at source 110. In the ideal case, where the received M & N values are equal to the original M & N values, fractional long-term accuracy of the recovered stream clock is the same as that of the original. But in the non-ideal case where the received M & N values are not equal to the original M & N values, frequency deviation between source 110 and sink 150 will accumulate over time, leading to a phase offset between read and write operations in data buffer 330 that may eventually cause buffer 330 overflow or underflow.
The second calibration device 560 monitors the buffer filling level 435 relative to a fixed buffer threshold at fixed reference time points 472, for example, at the horizontal blanking ending of an active line, then calculates the difference DM2=buffer filling level−buffer threshold. The output calibrated value for the second technique is M1′=M+DM2. Each of the selected calibration techniques has its advantages and disadvantages. The first calibration method does not need fixed timing reference in data stream 322, thus it can be applied to data stream in other video/audio standards in the future. However, method 1 may still have buffer overflow or underflow problems if the bit error rate of link channel 121 is extremely high. The second device can respond to high bit errors, although it requires fixed reference timing in the data stream. The second method is very suitable for DisplayPort, because DisplayPort has defined fixed timing reference in the serial data stream.
The Integer I and fraction values can be calculated by the following steps:
First, calculate DIV: DIV=16*M/N=M/2048, (when N=32768);
Second, find I(DIV) which is the integer part of DIV;
Third, choose n value so that I(DIV) multiplied with 2n yields an integer between 32 and 63;
Finally, calculate the Integer I and fraction values by the following expressions:
Integer (I)=I(DIV*2n)=I(M/2048*2n);
Fraction=F(M/2048*2n).
One example of the translation is illustrated in Table 2. For convenience, in some embodiments the most significant bit (MSB) is always kept as “1”. Therefore, the integer of (DIV*2n) is always between 32 and 63. For most of video formats defined in DisplayPort standard, the typical values of I1 and F post translation are listed in Table 1.
Typically, the link symbol clock rate 322 is fixed at 162 MHz or 270 MHz, thus after frequency division by 16 in Div_16710, the reference clock of PFD 720 can be fixed at 10.125 MHz or 16.875 MHz and VCO 750 frequency range is from 314 MHz to 1.114 GHz. Prescaler 770 directly follows VCO 750, slowing down the output frequency of VCO 750. Thus, the programmable divider does not need to operate at the VCO speed because of the prescaler's 4/5 frequency dividing. The recovered stream clock divisor div_sel (2n) 455 is provided by the M & N translator 450 of
The foregoing description is intended to illustrate but not to limit the scope of the invention, which is defined by the scope of the appended claims. Other embodiments are within the scope of the disclosure.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5844891 | Cox | Dec 1998 | A |
6044124 | Monahan et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6630868 | Perrott et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
7079595 | Jensen et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7102399 | Wu | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7176928 | Sendrovitz | Feb 2007 | B1 |
7295644 | Wu et al. | Nov 2007 | B1 |
7355539 | Petersen et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7365580 | Martin et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7567630 | Boehl et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7715513 | Lin et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7742553 | Bataineh et al. | Jun 2010 | B1 |
7801261 | Chakravarthy | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7911241 | Zeller | Mar 2011 | B1 |
7986190 | Lye | Jul 2011 | B1 |
20030086518 | Chakravarthy | May 2003 | A1 |
20050057384 | Chen et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050197064 | Ibrahim et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20060034394 | Popescu et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060161799 | Degenhardt | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20080186972 | Guo | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080212619 | Scott et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20090072874 | Sundstrom | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090147897 | Shin | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090232262 | Ku et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090296869 | Chao et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100289593 | Chen et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110006936 | Lin et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110150168 | Tseng et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
PCT International Preliminary Report on Patentability and the Written Opinion mailed Apr. 12, 2012, in related International Application No. PCT/US2010/050929. |
PCT International Search Report and the Written Opinion mailed Nov. 26, 2010, in related International Application No. PCT/US2010/050929. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110075782 A1 | Mar 2011 | US |