This application relates to a rotor for an induction motor wherein counter-bored holes are formed within the laminated core to reduce the likelihood of tears (cracks) forming during casting.
Induction motors are known, and typically include a squirrel cage assembly as part of a rotor. A stator surrounds the rotor, and the rotor is typically associated with a shaft which is to be driven to perform some use.
The rotor is formed of a pack of central iron laminations which are assembled together. End laminations are assembled at each end of the pack of central laminations. The combined laminations are placed into a mold, and a molten metal, typically copper or aluminum is moved into the mold. The laminations are all formed with teeth and gaps circumferentially spaced between the teeth. The gaps between teeth form slots. The molten metal moves into the gaps between the teeth (i.e. slots), forming bars. The molten metal also flows into cylindrical volumes at each end of the rotor, formed by cavities within the mold. These form the end-rings of the rotor. The bars and end-rings are to be homogeneous as formed by the casting process.
As the metal cools, the stresses across the entire rotor vary due to localized cooling differences. The mechanical joints between the bars and the end-rings have sometimes been subject to tears due to these stresses.
A rotor for an induction motor has a plurality of central laminations defining a central bore extending along an axis. End laminations are at each axial end of the central laminations. Metal is within gaps between teeth (i.e. slots) of the laminations. The lamination teeth extend radially outwardly from a central ring portion. A bore is formed in a face of the end laminations facing outwardly, and adjacent to where the teeth connect into the central ring portion.
A motor including such a rotor, and a method are also claimed.
These and other features of the present invention can be best understood from the following specification and drawings, of which the following is a brief description.
A motor 20 is shown schematically in
While the teeth and gaps may differ slightly through the central laminations at 28, the central laminations 28 have similar structure.
Thus, as shown at the top of
As shown in
A face of counterbore 50 is shown in
As shown in
In embodiments, the ratio of d3 to d2 was between 0.684 and 0.841. The ratio of d1 to d2 was between 0.213 and 0.407.
The chamfer counterbores may be drilled to the shape and depth as shown. The chamfer improves the flow of molten metal during casting and addresses the stress tears that occurred in the prior art.
Although embodiments of this invention have been disclosed, a worker of ordinary skill in this art would recognize that certain modifications would come within the scope of this invention. For that reason, the following claims should be studied to determine the true scope and content of this invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3758800 | McLaughlin | Sep 1973 | A |
4309635 | Sei et al. | Jan 1982 | A |
5642010 | Carosa et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
6020661 | Trago et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6091168 | Halsey et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6289663 | Schroder | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6483220 | Johnsen | Nov 2002 | B1 |
7036301 | Wassenhoven | May 2006 | B2 |
7208854 | Saban et al. | Apr 2007 | B1 |
7217100 | Benderradji et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7527479 | Shi et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7834509 | Legros et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
08-149769 | Jun 1996 | JP |
Entry |
---|
Machine translation of JP 08-149769 A, Shigeka et al, Jun. 7, 1996. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130026876 A1 | Jan 2013 | US |