Not Applicable.
In accordance with certain embodiments, the present invention relates to the field of connectors that attach to multi-toothed profiles on subsea wellheads and, more particularly, to connector profiles that better distribute stress among the teeth to strengthen the connection.
Connectors are employed to attach certain types of equipment to wellhead housings. One common example provides attaching blowout preventer equipment to a subsea wellhead. Bodies that house a blowout preventer are connected to a wellhead. Early designs of such a connection involved a generally C-shaped clamp that was forced to move radially to capture a pair of spaced flanges on the wellhead and the body of the blowout preventer. One example of this single contact surface for this type of collet connector is shown in U.S. Pat. No. 3,096,999. Another form of engagement uses a series of contact surfaces performing a similar connecting function as single surface, but the loading is now distributed on the multiple surfaces available. A common example of this connection kind is the Vetco H4 wellhead. Connector designs in the past may have varied in actuation techniques or size and shape of locking dogs, but one thing they all had in common was that the tooth profile was designed to match the wellhead profile for the size and spacing of engaging teeth. Some examples of such closely matched connector profiles to the wellhead profiles can be seen in DX series connectors offered by Drill Quip, H-4 connectors from ABB Vetco Gray and similar products from Cameron. These products featured a group of radially moving dogs where the tooth profile on the dog matches the wellhead tooth profile, and an angled ring drove the profiles together to connect a body to the wellhead.
This practice has gone on for years without recognition of a limitation of such minor image tooth profile designs in wellhead connector art. The problem not heretofore realized and addressed by the present invention is that using a minor image tooth profile on the locking dog results in an unequal distribution of stress and contact forces on the loading surfaces, with the loading surface closest to the connector body on the locking collet and wellhead bearing a disproportionately large percentage of the stress and contact force among the loading surfaces. This occurs because from a common reference line on the locking collet the loading surface closest to the reference line experienced the lowest percentage elongation and thus carried more of the stress than loading surfaces progressively further from a common and stationary reference line. The elongation of the dog and compression of the wellhead makes the loads progressively lower for each tooth profile further from a common reference line.
The present invention, exemplary embodiments of which are discussed below, provides various benefits and abates various concerns, such as the concerns addressed above.
In accordance with certain embodiments, the present invention puts forward a staggered contact design where contact is first established at the lowermost end of the collet or dog and on the wellhead at a location furthest from the preventer body. Then, as the collet or dog is powered to move radially inwardly, additional loading surfaces come into contact in a direction approaching the connector body.
As further exemplary embodiments, the present invention provides a connector for attaching to a multi-toothed profile on a wellhead, the connector featuring a tooth profile that initially staggers loading starting at a loading surface furthest from the preventer body sitting on the wellhead and moving toward the preventer body. The staggered loading more evenly distributes stresses at the preloaded condition on the matching loading surfaces as compared to the result of using a tooth profile on the connector that nearly exactly matches the profile on the wellhead. The joint can then handle higher operating pressures and external loads with reduced risk of connection failure. Of course, the foregoing are just examples of the present invention and are not intended to limit the appended claims to the embodiments described.
These and other features of the present invention will be more readily understood by those skilled in the art from a review of the drawings and the description of the exemplary embodiments provided below. Finally, the claims that later appear are indicative of the full scope of the present invention.
These and other features, aspects, and advantages of the present invention will become better understood when the following detailed description is read with reference to the accompanying drawings in which like characters represent like parts throughout the drawings, wherein:
The relation of the parts and the movements to secure the body 10 to the wellhead 12, in general, is by way of background to the invention, as the invention is addressed to the relation between the teeth 22 and 24. Those skilled in the art will know that most wellheads feature a tooth pattern 24 that has become an industry standard. The collet tooth pattern 22 thus forms a relationship to this industry standard pattern 24. The industry standard pattern 24 features a series of parallel ridges 25, 27 and 29. These generally are at a common fixed distance as between adjacent ridges. That said, embodiments of the present invention envision connecting to a variety of profiles in wellheads 12 that are commercially available or will be available in a manner that better distributes stress and contact forces as compared to currently available connector designs that emphasize a mirror image of the wellhead pattern on the collet that engages to it. Thus reference to teeth or engaging surfaces is not intended to be limited to particular existing wellhead patterns. Rather, such references relate to designs of interacting multiple surface assemblies that engage each other to attach a body such as a blowout preventer body to a wellhead.
Referring now to
There are variations to the pattern in the
In the loading shown in
The end result of this sequential contact is the stress and load distribution on the mating tooth profiles 22 and 24 is more balanced from top to bottom instead of being more concentrated toward the upper end 56 of wellhead 12. The prior designs featuring symmetrical tooth patterns for the collets and the wellhead stressed the uppermost teeth in the profile significantly more than the teeth closer to the collet lower end, where, for example surfaces 46 and 48 are located. By staggering the contact in a pattern using a plurality of pairs of contact surfaces from the downhole to the uphole direction, the resulting stress distribution is more uniform, improving the preload and increasing the integrity of the connection at higher loading conditions.
Turning to
With respect to these exemplary teeth, and incorporating any slope relationship that may be present with respect to these teeth, certain profile characteristics are present. For example, the distance from a given point on a ridge of a tooth to a corresponding point on a ridge of the same slope-polarity on the adjacent tooth decreases when progressing from a lower tooth to an upper tooth. For instance, in the illustrated embodiment, the distance represented by “Y” is greater than the distance represented by “Z”, and the distance represented by “Z” is greater than the distance represented by “A.” As another characteristic, the intermediate lower tooth 33 is thicker (distance “F”: the distance from a point on a ridge to the corresponding point on the opposite ridge on the same tooth) than upper intermediate tooth 35 (distance “E”). Moreover, upper intermediate tooth 35 is thicker than upper tooth 37 (distance “D”).
As a result of the arrangement presented in this figure, the gap represented by “J” is larger than that represented by “K”, and the gap represented by “K” is larger than “L”. Conversely, the distances represented by “X” are constant. Advantageously, an arrangement as such, as but one example, provides for the staggered engagement discussed above.
The above description is illustrative of the exemplary embodiments, and many modifications may be made by those skilled in the art without departing from the invention whose scope is to be determined from the literal and equivalent scope of the claims below. Again, the above description is illustrative of exemplary embodiments, and many modifications may be made by those skilled in the art without departing from the invention whose scope is to be determined from the literal and equivalent scope of the claims below.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/445,065, entitled “Stress Distributing Wellhead Connector”, filed on Jun. 1, 2006, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,614,453, which is herein incorporated by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2006520 | Stone et al. | Jul 1935 | A |
3210096 | Van | Oct 1965 | A |
3346278 | Yocum | Oct 1967 | A |
4113290 | Miida | Sep 1978 | A |
4346920 | Dailey | Aug 1982 | A |
4496172 | Walker | Jan 1985 | A |
4582348 | Dearden et al. | Apr 1986 | A |
4629222 | Dearden et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
4688832 | Ortloff et al. | Aug 1987 | A |
4708376 | Jennings et al. | Nov 1987 | A |
5174376 | Singeetham | Dec 1992 | A |
5522681 | Pallini, Jr. | Jun 1996 | A |
6070669 | Radi et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6283511 | Kamp | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6293343 | Pallini et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6540024 | Pallini et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6609731 | DeBerry et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6843508 | Cords et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
7040407 | Jennings et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7107663 | Ellington et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7380607 | Thomas | Jun 2008 | B2 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100078174 A1 | Apr 2010 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11445065 | Jun 2006 | US |
Child | 12571106 | US |