Stretch frame for stretching process

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 9761790
  • Patent Number
    9,761,790
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, June 18, 2013
    11 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, September 12, 2017
    7 years ago
Abstract
An apparatus comprising a frame and a pressure sensitive adhesive applied to at least a portion of the frame, where the pressure sensitive adhesive is arranged to bond a pre-strained film to the frame is disclosed. A method of making the apparatus also is disclosed. Also disclosed is a method of preparing a stretch frame for manufacturing electroactive polymer devices thereon.
Description
FIELD OF INVENTION

The present invention is directed in general to a stretch frame for a stretching process during manufacturing and more specifically, to a stretch frame for a stretching process during high volume manufacturing processes for producing electroactive polymer cartridges and transducers.


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

A tremendous variety of devices used today rely on actuators of one sort or another to convert electrical energy to mechanical energy. Conversely, many power generation applications operate by converting mechanical action into electrical energy. Employed to harvest mechanical energy in this fashion, the same type of device may be referred to as a generator. Likewise, when the structure is employed to convert physical stimulus such as vibration or pressure into an electrical signal for measurement purposes, it may be characterized as a sensor. Yet, the term “transducer” may be used to generically refer to any of the devices.


A number of design considerations favor the selection and use of advanced dielectric elastomer materials, also referred to as “electroactive polymers”, for the fabrication of transducers. These considerations include potential force, power density, power conversion/consumption, size, weight, cost, response time, duty cycle, service requirements, environmental impact, etc. As such, in many applications, electroactive polymer technology offers an ideal replacement for piezoelectric, shape-memory alloy and electromagnetic devices such as motors and solenoids.


An electroactive polymer transducer comprises two electrodes having deformable characteristics and separated by a thin elastomeric dielectric material. When a voltage difference is applied to the electrodes, the oppositely charged electrodes attract each other thereby compressing the polymer dielectric layer therebetween. As the electrodes are pulled closer together, the dielectric polymer film becomes thinner (the Z-axis component contracts) as it expands in the planar directions (along the X- and Y-axes), i.e., the displacement of the film is in-plane. The electroactive polymer film may also be configured to produce movement in a direction orthogonal to the film structure (along the Z-axis), i.e., the displacement of the film is out-of-plane. U.S. Pat. No. 7,567,681 discloses electroactive polymer film constructs which provide such out-of-plane displacement—also referred to as surface deformation or as thickness mode deflection.


The material and physical properties of the electroactive polymer film may be varied and controlled to customize the deformation undergone by the transducer. More specifically, factors such as the relative elasticity between the polymer film and the electrode material, the relative thickness between the polymer film and electrode material and/or the varying thickness of the polymer film and/or electrode material, the physical pattern of the polymer film and/or electrode material (to provide localized active and inactive areas), the tension or pre-strain placed on the electroactive polymer film as a whole, and the amount of voltage applied to or capacitance induced upon the film may be controlled and varied to customize the features of the film when in an active mode.


Numerous applications exist that benefit from the advantages provided by such electroactive polymer films whether using the film alone or using it in an electroactive polymer actuator. One of the many applications involves the use of electroactive polymer transducers as actuators to produce haptic, tactile, vibrational feedback (the communication of information to a user through forces applied to the user's body), and the like, in user interface devices. There are many known user interface devices which employ such feedback, typically in response to a force initiated by the user. Examples of user interface devices that may employ such feedback include keyboards, keypads, game controller, remote control, touch screens, computer mice, trackballs, stylus sticks, joysticks, etc. The user interface surface can comprise any surface that a user manipulates, engages, and/or observes regarding feedback or information from the device. Examples of such interface surfaces include, but are not limited to, a key (e.g., keys on a keyboard), a game pad or buttons, a display screen, etc.


The feedback provided by these types of interface devices is in the form of physical sensations, such as vibrations, pulses, spring forces, etc., which a user senses either directly (e.g., via touching of the screen), indirectly (e.g., via a vibrational effect such as when a cell phone vibrates in a purse or bag) or otherwise sensed (e.g., via an action of a moving body that creates a pressure disturbance sensed by the user). The proliferation of consumer electronic media devices such as smart phones, personal media players, portable computing devices, portable gaming systems, electronic readers, etc., can create a situation where a sub-segment of customers would benefit or desire an improved haptic effect in the electronic media device. However, increasing feedback capabilities in every model of an electronic media device may not be justified due to increased cost or increased profile of the device. Moreover, customers of certain electronic media devices may desire to temporarily improve the haptic capabilities of the electronic media device for certain activities.


Use of electroactive polymer materials in consumer electronic media devices as well as the numerous other commercial and consumer applications highlights the need to increase production volume while maintaining precision and consistency of the films.


Present techniques for stretching and laminating films to produce electroactive polymer devices require many steps and require that the stretch frame is cleaned after each use, which is very labor intensive. The present disclosure provides various stretch frames for producing electroactive polymer devices as described herein in the detailed description of the invention section of the present disclosure. The present disclosure also provides various stretching processing techniques for producing electroactive polymer devices as described herein in the detailed description of the invention section of the present disclosure.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

Electroactive polymer devices that can be used with these designs include, but are not limited to planar, diaphragm, thickness mode, roll, and passive coupled devices (hybrids) as well as any type of electroactive polymer device described in the commonly assigned patents and applications cited herein.


In one embodiment, an apparatus comprising a frame and a pressure sensitive adhesive (PSA) applied to at least a portion of the frame is provided. The pressure sensitive adhesive is arranged to bond a pre-strained film to the frame.


In some variations, a method comprising providing a stretch frame, applying a pressure sensitive adhesive on at least a portion of the stretch frame, providing a film, stretching the film, and laminating the pre-strained film onto the pressure sensitive adhesive coating of the stretch frame is provided.


In other variations, a method of making a stretch frame is provided. The method comprises providing a frame and applying a pressure sensitive adhesive on at least a portion of the frame. In one embodiment, the method further comprises the use of a release layer between the frame and the adhesive.


As noted above, there remains a need to mass produce such electroactive polymer devices while maintaining the performance characteristics obtained through batch production or lower volume manufacturing processes.


The present disclosure provides stretch frames and stretching processes for producing electroactive polymer devices and reducing manufacturing cycle time, waste, and labor for cleaning conventional stretch frames after uses. Other benefits include cost reduction, improvement in lamination integrity, enabling the use of narrower frames, providing efficient use of silicone film, increasing throughput, and the film printing process after the film lamination process is made easier with thinner stretch frames.


These and other features, objects and advantages of the invention will become apparent to those persons skilled in the art upon reading the details of the invention as more fully described below. In addition, variations of the processes and devices described herein include combinations of the embodiments or of aspects of the embodiments where possible are within the scope of this disclosure even if those combinations are not explicitly shown or discussed.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The invention is best understood from the following detailed description when read in conjunction with the accompanying drawings. To facilitate understanding, the same reference numerals have been used (where practical) to designate similar elements are common to the drawings. Included in the drawings are the following:



FIGS. 1A and 1B illustrate a top perspective view of a transducer before and after application of a voltage in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention;



FIG. 2A illustrates an exemplary electroactive polymer cartridge in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention;



FIG. 2B illustrates an exploded view of an electroactive polymer actuator, inertial mass and actuator housing in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention;



FIG. 3 illustrates a conventional stretch frame used in a conventional process;



FIG. 4 illustrates a sectional view of the conventional stretch frame shown in FIG. 3 taken along section 4-4,



FIG. 5 illustrates a flow diagram of a conventional process for stretching and laminating film onto the conventional stretch frame shown in FIG. 4;



FIG. 6 illustrates an exploded view of a reusable stretch frame according to one embodiment of the present invention;



FIG. 7 illustrates a sectional view of the reusable stretch frame shown in FIG. 6 taken along section 7-7;



FIG. 8 illustrates a pre-strained film laminated onto a pressure sensitive adhesive coating applied to the reusable stretch frame shown in FIGS. 6 and 7 according to one embodiment of the present invention;



FIG. 9 illustrates an exploded view of a disposable stretch frame according to one embodiment of the present invention;



FIG. 10 illustrates a sectional view of the disposable stretch frame shown in FIG. 8 taken along section 10-10;



FIG. 11 illustrates a pre-strained film laminated onto a pressure sensitive adhesive coating applied to the disposable stretch frame shown in FIGS. 9 and 10 according to one embodiment of the present invention;



FIG. 12 illustrates a schematic diagram of a stretcher for stretching film and laminating the pre-strained film on stretch frames according to one embodiment of the present invention;



FIG. 13 illustrates a flow diagram of a film stretching and laminating process according to one embodiment of the present invention;



FIG. 14 illustrates one embodiment of a semiautomatic stretcher being used to stretch film and to laminate the stretched film onto a stretch frame according to one embodiment of the present invention; and



FIG. 15 illustrates one embodiment of a semiautomatic stretcher for stretching film and laminating the stretched film onto a stretch frame according to one embodiment of the present invention.



FIG. 16 illustrates a side view of the semiautomatic stretcher shown in FIG. 15.





Variation of the invention from that shown in the figures is contemplated.


DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

Examples of electroactive polymer devices and their applications are described, for example, in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,343,129; 6,376,971; 6,543,110; 6,545,384; 6,583,533; 6,586,859; 6,628,040; 6,664,718; 6,707,236; 6,768,246; 6,781,284; 6,806,621; 6,809,462; 6,812,624; 6,876,135; 6,882,086; 6,891,317; 6,911,764; 6,940,221; 7,034,432; 7,049,732; 7,052,594; 7,062,055; 7,064,472; 7,166,953; 7,199,501; 7,199,501; 7,211,937; 7,224,106; 7,233,097; 7,259,503; 7,320,457; 7,362,032; 7,368,862; 7,378,783; 7,394,282; 7,436,099; 7,492,076; 7,521,840; 7,521,847; 7,567,681; 7,595,580; 7,608,989; 7,626,319; 7,750,532; 7,761,981; 7,911,761; 7,915,789; 7,952,261; 8,183,739; 8,222,799; 8,248,750; and in U.S. Patent Application Publication Nos.; 2007/0200457; 2007/0230222; 2011/0128239; and 2012/0126959, the entireties of which are incorporated herein by reference.


In various embodiments, the present invention provides a stretch frame for stretching film and/or laminating the stretched film onto the stretch frame. In various embodiments, the present invention provides a stretching process employing the stretch frame for stretching and/or laminating the stretched film. In one embodiment, a polymer film is stretched and/or laminated using the stretch frame and process according to the present disclosure to manufacture electroactive polymer devices. Embodiments of the stretch frame and stretching process according to the present disclosure can be used to stretch and laminate film to reduce manufacturing costs relative to conventional techniques by eliminating numerous processing steps and preclude the need for cleaning the stretch frames after each use, which can be labor intensive. Various embodiments of the present invention employ a unique coating stack to hold a pre-strained film tightly during manufacturing of electroactive polymer devices and to enable easy removal of film remnants left on the stretch frame after the devices are removed, e.g., cut out, from the stretch frame. In one embodiment, the stretch frames are disposable. In another embodiment, at least a portion of the stretch frame can be incorporated permanently into the transducer.


In one embodiment, a pressure sensitive adhesive (PSA) and release coat are applied to the stretch frame to hold a pre-strained film on the stretch frame and to enable easy removal of any pressure sensitive adhesive and/or film remnants from the stretch frame after each use, respectively. In addition to reducing manufacturing costs by decreasing the number of stretching and laminating steps and labor costs of cleaning stretch frames after each use, embodiments of the present invention also enable the use of narrower stretch frames, which provides additional printing area for an equally sized frame with the same outside dimensions, leading to increased manufacturing throughput.


For some electroactive polymer device configurations, the adhesives can be printed after film-to-film lamination. Conventional stretch frames that employ two aluminum stretch frames, it is difficult to build more than two layers of film in a lamination due to the thickness of the stretch frames. Embodiments of the present invention provide thinner single stretch frames to simplify the stretching and/or lamination processes.


Films useful in embodiments of the present invention include, but are not limited to those made from polymers such as silicone, polyurethane, acrylate, hydrocarbon rubber, olefin copolymer, polyvinylidene fluoride copolymer, fluoroelastomer styrenic copolymer, and adhesive elastomer.


Prior to describing the stretch frame and stretch/laminating process according to various embodiments of the present invention, the description now turns to FIGS. 1A and 1B, which illustrate an example of an electroactive polymer film or membrane 10 structure. A thin elastomeric dielectric film or layer 12 is sandwiched between compliant or stretchable electrode plates or layers 14 and 16, thereby forming a capacitive structure or film. The length “l” and width “w” of the dielectric layer, as well as that of the composite structure, are much greater than its thickness “t”. Preferably, the dielectric layer has a thickness in the range from about 10 μm to about 100 μm, with the total thickness of the structure in the range from about 15 μm to about 10 cm. The thickness of the dielectric layer in the transducer can be reduced during fabrication by stretching (or pre-straining) the dielectric film. The stretching can be uniaxial or biaxial. In biaxial pre-strain, the stretch ratio may be equal in all directions or it can be anisotropic with stretching in one axis greater than in another.


It is additionally desirable to select the elastic modulus, thickness, and/or the geometry of electrodes 14, 16 such that the additional stiffness they contribute to the actuator is generally less than the stiffness of the dielectric layer 12, which has a relatively low modulus of elasticity, i.e., less than about 100 MPa and more preferably less than about 10 MPa, but is likely thicker than each of the electrodes. Electrodes suitable for use with these compliant capacitive structures are those capable of withstanding cyclic strains greater than about 1% without failure due to mechanical fatigue.


As seen in FIG. 1B, when a voltage is applied across the electrodes, the unlike charges in the two electrodes 14, 16 are attracted to each other and these electrostatic attractive forces compress the dielectric film 12 (along the Z-axis). The dielectric film 12 is thereby caused to deflect with a change in electric field. As electrodes 14, 16 are compliant, they change shape with dielectric layer 12. In the context of the present disclosure, “deflection” refers to any displacement, expansion, contraction, torsion, linear or area strain, or any other deformation of a portion of dielectric film 12. Depending on the architecture, e.g., a frame, in which capacitive structure 10 is employed (collectively referred to as a “transducer”), this deflection may be used to produce mechanical work. Various different transducer architectures are disclosed and described in the above-identified patent references.


With a voltage applied, the transducer film 10 continues to deflect until mechanical forces balance the electrostatic forces driving the deflection. The mechanical forces include elastic restoring forces of the dielectric layer 12, the compliance or stretching of the electrodes 14, 16 and any external resistance provided by a device and/or load coupled to transducer 10. The resultant deflection of the transducer 10 as a result of the applied voltage may also depend on a number of other factors such as the dielectric constant of the elastomeric material and its size and stiffness. Removal of the voltage difference and the induced charge causes the reverse effects.


In some cases, the electrodes 14 and 16 may cover a limited portion of dielectric film 12 relative to the total area of the film. This may be done to prevent electrical breakdown around the edge of the dielectric or achieve customized deflections in certain portions thereof. Dielectric material outside an active area (the latter being a portion of the dielectric material having sufficient electrostatic force to enable deflection of that portion) may be caused to act as an external spring force on the active area during deflection. More specifically, material outside the active area may resist or enhance active area deflection by its contraction or expansion.


The dielectric film 12 may be pre-strained using the various embodiments of the stretch frame and process according to the present invention described herein. The pre-strain improves conversion between electrical and mechanical energy. i.e., the pre-strain allows the dielectric film 12 to deflect more and provide greater mechanical work. Pre-strain of a film may be described as the change in dimension in a direction after pre-straining relative to the dimension in that direction before pre-straining. The pre-strain may include elastic deformation of the dielectric film and be formed, for example, by stretching the film in tension and fixing one or more of the edges while stretched, as indicated in FIG. 10. The pre-strain may be imposed at the boundaries of the film or for only a portion of the film and may be implemented by using a rigid frame or by stiffening a portion of the film.


The transducer structure of FIGS. 1A and 1B and other similar compliant structures and the details of their constructs are more fully described in many of the referenced patents and publications disclosed herein.



FIG. 2A illustrates an exemplary electroactive polymer cartridge 12 having an electroactive polymer transducer film 26 placed between rigid frame 8 where the electroactive polymer film 26 is exposed in openings of the frame 8. The exposed portion of the film 26 includes two working pairs of thin elastic electrodes 32 on either side of the cartridge 12 where the electrodes 32 sandwich or surround the exposed portion of the film 26. The electroactive polymer film 26 can have any number of configurations. However, in one example, the electroactive polymer film 26 comprises a thin layer of elastomeric dielectric polymer (e.g., made of acrylate, silicone, urethane, thermoplastic elastomer, hydrocarbon rubber, fluoroelastomer, styrenic copolymer elastomer, or the like). When a voltage difference is applied across the oppositely-charged electrodes 32 of each working pair (i.e., across paired electrodes that are on either side of the film 26), the opposed electrodes attract each other thereby compressing the dielectric polymer layer 26 therebetween. The area between opposed electrodes is considered the active area. As the electrodes are pulled closer together, the dielectric polymer 26 becomes thinner (i.e., the Z-axis component contracts) as it expands in the planar directions (i.e., the X- and Y-axes components expand) (See FIG. 1B for axis references).


Furthermore, in variations where the electrodes contain conductive particles, like charges distributed across each electrode may cause conductive particles embedded within that electrode to repel one another, thereby contributing to the expansion of the elastic electrodes and dielectric films. In alternate variations, electrodes do not contain conductive particles (e.g., textured sputtered metal films). The dielectric layer 26 is thereby caused to deflect with a change in electric field. As the electrode material is also compliant, the electrode layers change shape along with dielectric layer 26. As stated hereinabove, deflection refers to any displacement, expansion, contraction, torsion, linear or area strain, or any other deformation of a portion of dielectric layer 26. This deflection may be used to produce mechanical work. As shown, the dielectric layer 26 can also include one or more mechanical output bars 34. The bars 34 can optionally provide attachment points for either an inertial mass (as described below) or for direct coupling to a substrate in the electronic media device.


In fabricating a transducer, an elastic film 26 can be stretched and held in a pre-strained condition usually by a rigid frame or stretch frame 8. In those variations employing a four-sided frame, the film can be stretched bi-axially. It has been observed that pre-strain improves the dielectric strength of the polymer layer 26, thereby enabling the use of higher electric fields and improving conversion between electrical and mechanical energy, i.e., the pre-strain allows the film to deflect more and provide greater mechanical work. Preferably, the electrode material is applied after pre-straining the polymer layer, but may be applied beforehand. The two electrodes provided on the same side of layer 26, referred to herein as same-side electrode pairs, i.e., electrodes on the top side of dielectric layer 26 and electrodes on a bottom side of dielectric layer 26, can be electrically isolated from each other. The opposed electrodes on the opposite sides of the polymer layer form two sets of working electrode pairs, i.e., electrodes spaced by the electroactive polymer film 26 form one working electrode pair and electrodes surrounding the adjacent exposed electroactive polymer film 26 form another working electrode pair. Each same-side electrode pair can have the same polarity, whereas the polarity of the electrodes of each working electrode pair is opposite each other. Each electrode has an electrical contact portion configured for electrical connection to a voltage source.


Examples of electroactive polymer films can be found in the commonly assigned patents and patent applications disclosed and incorporated by reference herein.


Now turning to FIG. 3, where a conventional stretch frame 100 used in a conventional process is illustrated. As shown, the conventional stretch frame 100 includes a top frame element 102 and a bottom frame 104 element. The top frame element 102 is slightly smaller than the bottom frame element 104. With reference now to both FIGS. 3 and 4, a pre-strained dielectric film 106 is sandwiched between the top and bottom frame elements 102, 104 of the stretch frame 100. An adhesive tape 108 may be employed to bond the top and bottom frame elements 102, 104 together. This holds the pre-strained film 108 in place for subsequent lamination and printing processes. Once the printing process is completed, the individual electroactive polymer devices are removed, e.g., cut out (singulated), from the film 108 and removed from the stretch frame 100. The tape 108 and any film remnants must then be removed the stretch frame 100 before the stretch frame 100 can be reused. Removing the tape 108 and film remnants increases the manufacturing cycle time and adds labor costs for cleaning the stretch frame after each use. Although the top and bottom stretch frame elements 102, 104 can be made of any suitable materials such as metals and rigid plastics, generally these components are made of aluminum.



FIG. 5 illustrates a flow diagram 200 of a conventional process for stretching and laminating film onto the conventional stretch frame shown in FIG. 4. This process 200 will now be described in conjunction with FIGS. 3 and 4. The process 200 starts by providing 202 the bottom frame element 104. The film 106 is stretched 204 and laminated 206 onto the bottom frame element 104. The top frame element 102 is then provided and placed above the stretched film 106 and the bottom frame element 104. The tape 108 is applied to bond the top and bottom frame elements 102, 104 to hold the pre-strained film 108 during the manufacturing steps. The electroactive polymer devices are manufactured using the stretch frame 100. The devices are then removed 216 from the film 108. The excess film 108 is removed 218 and the tape 108 is removed and cleaned from the stretch frame 100.


Having described the film stretching and laminating process for manufacturing electroactive polymer devices using a conventional stretch frame 100 and process 200, the disclosure now turns to FIG. 6, which illustrates an exploded view of a reusable stretch frame 300 according to one embodiment of the present invention and FIG. 7, which illustrates a sectional view of the stretch frame shown in FIG. 6 taken along section 7-7. As shown in FIGS. 6 and 7, the reusable stretch frame 300 according to one embodiment of the present invention comprises a bottom stretch frame element 302, a permanent, or long term, release coating 304 applied to a top portion of the stretch frame element 302, and a pressure sensitive adhesive 306 applied to the release coating 304. The release coating 304 is reusable and generally is applied once to the stretch frame element 302. Although the stretch frame element 302 can be made of any suitable material, the stretch frame element 302 is generally made of aluminum.


The reusable stretch frame 300 can be manufactured with thinner, narrower, stretch frame elements 302, which provides the additional advantage of increasing the pre-strained film 106 area available for printing the electroactive polymer components, for example. In other words, thinner or narrower stretch frame elements 302 increase the ratio of print area over the overall area defined by the stretch frame element 302.


As shown in FIG. 8, the pre-strained film 106 is laminated onto the pressure sensitive adhesive material 306, which will hold the pre-strained film 106 during the electroactive polymer device manufacturing steps. Since the pre-strained film 106 is bonded to the stretch frame element 302 by the pressure sensitive adhesive 306, there is no need for a top stretch frame element 102 and tape 108 or other method to bond the top and bottom stretch frame elements 102, 104 as shown and described in connection with FIGS. 3 and 4.



FIG. 9 illustrates an exploded view of a disposable stretch frame 400 according to one embodiment of the present invention. FIG. 10 illustrates a sectional view of the stretch frame shown in FIG. 8 taken along section 10-10. The disposable stretch frame 400 comprises a stretch frame element 402 made of relatively inexpensive material (e.g., plastic) to make it economically feasible to make it disposable. A pressure sensitive adhesive 404 coating is applied to a top portion of the stretch frame element 402 but no release coating is necessary since the disposable stretch frame 400 will not be reused. FIG. 11 illustrates a pre-strained film 106 laminated onto the pressure sensitive adhesive 404 coating applied to the stretch frame element 402.


Another embodiment of this invention is that at least a portion of the disposable stretch frame can be incorporated into the structure of the transducer cartridge. For example, an adhesive coated polyethylene terephthalate (PET) film with apertures could be laminated onto a pre-strained dielectric film, processed through printing stations to add electrodes, and singulated into individual transducers by die-cutting through the entire materials stack. Using the disposable stretch frame material in the final product could reduce product cost by eliminating the steps used to print a frame in an electroactive polymer cartridge.


Although the reusable and disposable stretch frames 300, 400 are illustrated as having a generally rectilinear shape, the shape of these stretch frames 300, 400 should not be limited as such. In general, the stretch frames 300, 400 may be implemented using any suitable triangular, square, rectangular, rhomboidal, polygonal, circular, oval, irregular, or other suitable shape.



FIG. 12 illustrates a schematic diagram of a stretcher 500 for stretching film and laminating the pre-strained film on the stretch frames 300, 400 according to one embodiment of the present invention. The film 106 is initially rolled out and clamped on either side. As the film 106 advanced the clamps follow a track that widens and stretches the film 106. During the process, after the film 106 has been stretched, the film 106 is laminated onto the pressure sensitive adhesive coating applied to the reusable stretch frame 300 or the disposable stretch frame 400. After the pre-strained film 106 is laminated onto the stretch frames 300 (400), the frames are removed, e.g., cut out, from the film web and routed to an electroactive polymer device manufacturing stage, where the various components of the electroactive polymer device are printed or applied to the pre-strained film 106 bonded to the stretch frame 300 (400).


The cleaning process is simple. After the device or plurality of devices is removed from the pre-strained film 106, the pressure sensitive adhesive 306 and film remnants are peeled easily from the release coating 304. The reusable stretch frame 300 with the release coating 304 is reusable. For materials selection, consideration is given to the tack and peel adhesion properties of the pressure sensitive adhesive 306 as well as the release properties of the pressure sensitive adhesive 306. In other words, the pressure sensitive adhesive 306 should not be too easily released from the release coating 304 so it will remain during the manufacturing process, but should be easily released for the cleaning process. For making the release coating 306 permanent, an adhesion promoter can be applied to a portion of the stretch frame 300 prior to applying the release coating 304 thereon.


Various materials can be employed for the pressure sensitive adhesive 306 and the release coating 304. In one embodiment the pressure sensitive adhesive 306 is a Dow Corning 2013 (a solvent-free silicone pressure sensitive adhesive that, when used with SYL-OFF 4000 catalyst (a blend of platinum catalyst and vinyl functional silicone polymer), offers the ability to prepare pressure sensitive constructions at low curing temperatures) material, among other materials, for example; the release coating 304 is a Dow Corning SYL-OFF Q2-7785 (an 88% active solids dispersion of fluorofunctional silicone polymer in heptane), among other materials, for example; and optionally, an adhesion promoter for the release coating 304 to aluminum stretch frame 302 is NuSil CF2-135 (silicone primer), among other materials, for example.


Other materials that may be employed for the pressure sensitive adhesive 304 include: Dow Corning 280A (a dispersion of polydimethylsiloxane gum and resin diluted with xylene to 55% silicone solids content.), Dow Corning 282 (a dispersion of polydimethyldisiloxane gum and resin diluted with xylene to 55% silicone solids content), Dow Corning 7355 (a dispersion of polydimethylsiloxane gum and resin diluted with xylene and toluene to an average 56.5 percent silicone solids content), Dow Corning 7358 (a dispersion of polydimethylsiloxane gum and resin diluted with xylene and toluene to an average 56.5 percent silicone solids content), Dow Corning 7388 (a dispersion of polydimethylsiloxane gum and resin diluted with xylene to 55% to 58% silicone solids content), Dow Corning 7651, 7652, 7657, Dow Corning SYL-OFF Q2-7566 (a dispersion of polydimethylsiloxane gum and resin diluted with xylene to 55% silicone solids content), Dow Corning SYL-OFF Q2-7735 (a peroxide-curable silicone pressure sensitive adhesive designed to provide low, stable release from liners made with Dow Corning SYL-OFF Q2-7785 Release Coating, while maintaining high subsequent tack and adhesion properties; the adhesive is a dispersion of siloxane gum and silicone resin diluted with xylene to 55% silicone solids content), Dow Corning SYL-OFF Q2-7406 (a polydimethylsiloxane gum and resin dispersion), Momentive SILGRIP PSA529 (silicone pressure sensitive adhesive), Momentive SILGRIP PSA590 (a silicone pressure sensitive adhesive based on a toluene solution of polysiloxane gum and resin and supplied at 60% silicone solids and may be further diluted with aromatic, aliphatic or chlorinated solvents), Momentive SILGRIP PSA595 (a silicone pressure sensitive adhesive based on a xylene solution of polysiloxane gum and resin and supplied at 55% silicone solids and may be further diluted with aromatic, aliphatic or chlorinated solvents), Momentive SILGRIP PSA6573A (a silicone pressure sensitive adhesive based on a toluene solution of polysiloxane gum and resin and supplied at 60% silicone solids and may be further diluted with aromatic, aliphatic or chlorinated solvents), Momentive SILGRIP PSA6574 (a silicone pressure sensitive adhesive based on a toluene solution of phenyl based polysiloxane gum and resin supplied at 55% silicone solids and may be further diluted with aromatic, aliphatic or chlorinated solvents), NuSil PSA-1170 (a silicone based pressure sensitive adhesive), among other materials, for example. Other adhesives may also be employed that are not pressure sensitive adhesives such as hot-melt, liquid, thermal curing, UV curing, and B-staged adhesives. A wide range of adhesives can be used including silicones, fluorosilicones, acrylates, polyurethanes, olefins, hydrocarbon rubbers, styrene copolymers, epoxies, hot-melt adhesives, pressure sensitive adhesives, thermal curing adhesives, UV curing adhesives, liquid adhesives, and any combinations thereof, among other materials.


Materials that may be employed for the release coating 304 include: Momentive FSR2000 (a fluorosilicone polymer containing platinum catalyst), epoxy silicone, fluoropolymer, fluorosilicone, among other materials, for example. The choice of the release coating is highly dependent on the materials used for the stretch frame, adhesive, and stretched dielectric film.


Additional materials that have been tested but have not performed as well as the above listed materials for a silicone film design include, for the release coating 304: Magnaplate coatings including polymer-based LECTROFLUOR, TUFRAM surface enhancement coating, and TEFLON (polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) synthetic fluoropolymer of tetrafluoroethylene), mold release, EASE RELEASE 200, among other materials. These materials may find utility for other chemistries, however.


Portions of the surface of the stretch frame may be pre-treated prior to the application of the release coating to improve the formation and adhesion of a strong, durable release coating. Treatment agents include solvents, primers, coupling agents, and etchants. An exemplary adhesion promoter for a fluorosilicone release coating 304 to the aluminum stretch frame 302 is NuSil MED1-161 (silicone primer specially formulated primer designed for use with platinum-cured systems where conventional silicone primers are insufficient.



FIG. 13 illustrates a flow diagram 600 of a film stretching and laminating process according to one embodiment of the present invention. As shown in FIG. 13, a stretch frame 300 (400) is provided 602 and a pressure sensitive adhesive 306 is applied thereto. In one embodiment, the reusable stretch frame 300 is made of aluminum, or other reusable material. The release coating 304 is applied to the aluminum reusable stretch frame 300 prior to its introduction into the process depicted in the flow diagram 600. When a disposable stretch frame 400 is employed, then the pressure sensitive adhesive 306 can be applied directly to the disposable stretch frame 400 material. Once the pressure sensitive adhesive 306 coating is applied, the film 106 stretched and the pre-strained film 106 is laminated onto the stretch frame 300 (400). After lamination the stretch frame 300 (400) with the pre-strained film 106 is employed to manufacture 610 the electroactive polymer devices as described in connection with FIGS. 1A, 1B, 2A, 2B. The devices are then removed, e.g., cut 612, from the pre-strained film 106 bonded to the stretch frame 300 (400) by the pressure sensitive adhesive 306. When a reusable stretch frame 300 is employed, the excess film 106 and the pressure sensitive adhesive 306 are simply peeled away from the release coating 304, making clean up easy and preparation of the stretch frame 300 for the next process run more efficient. When a disposable stretch frame 400 is employed, the entire stretch frame 400 is disposed of.



FIG. 14 illustrates one embodiment of a semiautomatic stretcher 700 being used to stretch film 106 and to laminate the stretched film 106 onto a stretch frame 300 (400) according to one embodiment of the present invention. The semiautomatic stretcher 700 is being used to stretch the film 106 and for film-frame lamination on the film stretcher 500 (as shown in FIG. 12). As shown in FIG. 14, an operator 702 is in the process of laminating the film 106 onto the frames 300 (400) that were coated with the pressure sensitive adhesive 306, as described in connection with FIGS. 6-8. Although a manual lamination process is shown, embodiments of the present invention encompass a fully automatic process where a roller or other means are employed to perform the lamination function. Also, the film 106 stretcher 500 can be advanced continuously or indexed by a single frame 300 (400) or a predetermined number of frames 300 (400).



FIG. 15 illustrates one embodiment of a semiautomatic stretcher 800 for stretching film 106 with the film stretcher 500 (as shown in FIG. 12) and laminating the stretched film 106 onto a stretch frame 300 (400) according to one embodiment of the present invention. FIG. 16 illustrates a side view of the semiautomatic stretcher 800. With reference now to FIGS. 15, and 16, the semiautomatic stretcher 800 comprises a base material roll 802, a machine direction orientation roll 808, a first scrap winder 810, and a second scrap winder 812. The base material roll 802 comprises a dielectric film 106 layer sandwiched between a polyethylene terephthalate layer 804 and a polyethylene (PE) interleave layer 806. In operation, as the base material roll 802 rotates the polyethylene terephthalate layer 804 is wound by the first scrap winder 810 and the PE interleave layer 806 is wound by the second scrap winder 812. The dielectric film layer 106 is advanced to the film stretcher 500 portion. A tape unwind spool 814 can be employed to apply tape 816 to the edges of the edges of the dielectric film 106 to reinforce the film 106 during the stretching phase.


As previously discussed, the various embodiments of the stretch frames 300 (400) and process 601) for stretching and laminating the film 106 onto the stretch frames 300 (400) provide several advantages over the conventional stretch frame 100 and process 200. Such advantages include, without limitation, cost reduction, improved lamination integrity, enables use of narrower frames to increase the film area available for printing, efficient use of silicone film, and increase throughput. Also, printing after the lamination process becomes easier with thinner stretch frames.


As for other details of the present invention, materials and alternate related configurations may be employed as within the level of those with skill in the relevant art. The same may hold true with respect to process-based aspects of the invention in terms of additional acts as commonly or logically employed. In addition, though the invention has been described in reference to several examples, optionally incorporating various features, the invention is not to be limited to that which is described or indicated as contemplated with respect to each variation of the invention. Various changes may be made to the invention described and equivalents (whether recited herein or not included for the sake of some brevity) may be substituted without departing from the true spirit and scope of the invention. Any number of the individual parts or subassemblies shown may be integrated in their design. Such changes or others may be undertaken or guided by the principles of design for assembly.


Also, it is contemplated that any optional feature of the inventive variations described may be set forth and claimed independently, or in combination with any one or more of the features described herein. Reference a singular item, includes the possibility that there are plural of the same items present. More specifically, as used herein and in the appended claims, the singular forms “a,” “an,” “said,” and “the” include plural referents unless the specifically stated otherwise. In other words, use of the articles allow for “at least one” of the subject item in the description above as well as the claims below. It is further noted that the claims may be drafted to exclude any optional element. As such, this statement is intended to serve as antecedent basis for use of such exclusive terminology as “solely,” “only” and the like in connection with the recitation of claim elements, or use of a “negative” limitation. Without the use of such exclusive terminology, the term “comprising” in the claims shall allow for the inclusion of any additional element irrespective of whether a given number of elements are enumerated in the claim, or the addition of a feature could be regarded as transforming the nature of an element set forth in the claims. Stated otherwise, unless specifically defined herein, all technical and scientific terms used herein are to be given as broad a commonly understood meaning as possible while maintaining claim validity.

Claims
  • 1. A method of fabricating a polymer film device, the method comprising: providing an apparatus comprising: a stretch frame; andan adhesive applied to at least a portion of the stretch frame, wherein the adhesive is configured to bond a pre-strained film tightly to the stretch frame during a manufacture of electroactive polymer devices and further configured to enable an easy removal of film remnants left on the stretch frame after the electroactive polymer devices are removed from the stretch frame;providing a film;stretching the film;laminating or bonding the pre-strained film onto the adhesive coating of the stretch frame;manufacturing the electroactive polymer device on the pre-strained film; andremoving the electroactive polymer devices from the pre-strained film bonded to the stretch frame by the adhesive.
  • 2. The method according to claim 1, further comprising incorporating at least a portion of the stretch frame into the electroactive polymer device.
  • 3. The method according to claim 1, further comprising applying a release coating onto at least a portion of the stretch frame and applying the adhesive coating on top of the release coating.
  • 4. A method of fabricating a polymer film device, the method comprising: providing an apparatus comprising: a stretch frame; andan adhesive applied to at least a portion of the stretch frame, wherein the adhesive is configured to bond a pre-strained film tightly to the stretch frame during a manufacture of electroactive polymer devices and further configured to enable an easy removal of film remnants left on the stretch frame after the electroactive polymer devices are removed from the stretch frame;providing a film;stretching the film;laminating or bonding the pre-strained film onto the adhesive coating of the stretch frame;applying a release coating onto at least a portion of the stretch frame and applying the adhesive coating on top of the release coating; andapplying an adhesion promoter to at least a portion of the stretch frame prior to applying the release coating thereon.
  • 5. The method according to claim 3, further comprising reusing the stretch frame by removing at least a portion of the pre-strained film from the release coating.
RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is the U.S. National Stage application filed under 35 U.S.C. §371(c) of International Application No. PCT/US2013/046248, filed on Jun. 18, 2013, that claims the benefit, under 35 USC §119(e), of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/660,887 filed Jun. 18, 2012 entitled “STRETCH FRAME CONCEPT FOR RE-ENGINEERED STRETCHING PROCESS” the entireties of which is incorporated herein by reference.

PCT Information
Filing Document Filing Date Country Kind
PCT/US2013/046248 6/18/2013 WO 00
Publishing Document Publishing Date Country Kind
WO2013/192143 12/27/2013 WO A
US Referenced Citations (740)
Number Name Date Kind
2430013 Hansell Nov 1947 A
2967914 Pye Jan 1961 A
3050034 Benton Aug 1962 A
3056932 Wood Oct 1962 A
3303750 Powell Feb 1967 A
3304773 Rogallo Feb 1967 A
3400281 Malik Sep 1968 A
3403234 Barnes, Jr. et al. Sep 1968 A
3463942 Mellon Aug 1969 A
3509714 Walton May 1970 A
3516846 Matson Jun 1970 A
3539841 Riff Nov 1970 A
3558936 Horan Jan 1971 A
3606241 Bornholdt Sep 1971 A
3699963 Zaffaroni Oct 1972 A
3783480 Booe Jan 1974 A
3798473 Murayama et al. Mar 1974 A
3801839 Yo Apr 1974 A
3816774 Ohnuki et al. Jun 1974 A
3821967 Sturman et al. Jul 1974 A
3832580 Yamamuro et al. Aug 1974 A
3851363 Booe Dec 1974 A
3903733 Murayama et al. Sep 1975 A
3935485 Yoshida et al. Jan 1976 A
3940637 Ohigashi et al. Feb 1976 A
3943614 Yoshikawa et al. Mar 1976 A
3947644 Uchikawa Mar 1976 A
3965757 Barrus Jun 1976 A
4011474 O'Neill Mar 1977 A
4028566 Franssen et al. Jun 1977 A
4051395 Taylor Sep 1977 A
4056742 Tibbetts Nov 1977 A
4088915 Kodama May 1978 A
4089927 Taylor May 1978 A
4127749 Atoji et al. Nov 1978 A
4140936 Bullock Feb 1979 A
4155950 Berezuk et al. May 1979 A
4158787 Forward Jun 1979 A
4170742 Itagaki et al. Oct 1979 A
4190336 Frank et al. Feb 1980 A
4216403 Krempl et al. Aug 1980 A
4227347 Tam Oct 1980 A
4234813 Iguchi et al. Nov 1980 A
4236416 Barcita Dec 1980 A
4240535 Pierce et al. Dec 1980 A
4245815 Willis Jan 1981 A
4257594 Conrey et al. Mar 1981 A
4266339 Kalt May 1981 A
4283461 Wooden et al. Aug 1981 A
4283649 Heinouchi Aug 1981 A
4284921 Lemonon et al. Aug 1981 A
4290983 Sasaki et al. Sep 1981 A
4297394 Wooden et al. Oct 1981 A
4315433 Edelman et al. Feb 1982 A
4322877 Taylor Apr 1982 A
4326762 Hockenbrock et al. Apr 1982 A
4330730 Kurz et al. May 1982 A
4342936 Marcus et al. Aug 1982 A
4344743 Bessman et al. Aug 1982 A
4346505 Lemonon et al. Aug 1982 A
4363991 Edelman Dec 1982 A
4373525 Kobayashi Feb 1983 A
4376302 Miller Mar 1983 A
4384394 Lemonon et al. May 1983 A
4387318 Kolm et al. Jun 1983 A
4400634 Micheron Aug 1983 A
4401911 Ravinet et al. Aug 1983 A
4404490 Taylor et al. Sep 1983 A
4413202 Krempl et al. Nov 1983 A
4433359 Hamabe et al. Feb 1984 A
4434452 Hamabe et al. Feb 1984 A
4435667 Kolm et al. Mar 1984 A
4442372 Roberts Apr 1984 A
4469920 Murphy Sep 1984 A
4469978 Hamada et al. Sep 1984 A
4472255 Millington et al. Sep 1984 A
4473806 Johnston Sep 1984 A
4500377 Broussoux et al. Feb 1985 A
4518555 Ravinet et al. May 1985 A
4561830 Bradley Dec 1985 A
4566135 Schmidt Jan 1986 A
4588998 Yamamuro et al. May 1986 A
4592383 Rikuta Jun 1986 A
4594058 Fischell Jun 1986 A
4595338 Kolm et al. Jun 1986 A
4598338 Van Devender et al. Jul 1986 A
4605167 Maehara Aug 1986 A
4626730 Hubbard, Jr. Dec 1986 A
4638207 Radice Jan 1987 A
4654554 Kishi Mar 1987 A
4668449 Soni et al. May 1987 A
4671792 Borsanyi Jun 1987 A
4678955 Toda Jul 1987 A
4686440 Hatamura et al. Aug 1987 A
4689614 Strachan Aug 1987 A
4704556 Kay Nov 1987 A
4715396 Fox Dec 1987 A
4728265 Cannon Mar 1988 A
4733121 Hebert Mar 1988 A
4748366 Taylor May 1988 A
4762733 Thiel et al. Aug 1988 A
4783888 Fujii et al. Nov 1988 A
4784479 Ikemori Nov 1988 A
4785837 Hansen et al. Nov 1988 A
4786837 Kalnin et al. Nov 1988 A
4787411 Moldenhauer Nov 1988 A
4793588 Laverty, Jr. Dec 1988 A
4803671 Rochling et al. Feb 1989 A
4808084 Tsubouchi et al. Feb 1989 A
4814661 Ratzlaff et al. Mar 1989 A
4820236 Berliner et al. Apr 1989 A
4824107 French Apr 1989 A
4825116 Itoh et al. Apr 1989 A
4833659 Geil et al. May 1989 A
4835747 Billet May 1989 A
4839872 Gragnolati et al. Jun 1989 A
4843275 Radice Jun 1989 A
4849668 Crawley et al. Jul 1989 A
4868447 Lee et al. Sep 1989 A
4869282 Sittler et al. Sep 1989 A
4870868 Gastgeb et al. Oct 1989 A
4877957 Okada et al. Oct 1989 A
4877988 McGinniss et al. Oct 1989 A
4879698 Langberg Nov 1989 A
4885783 Whitehead et al. Dec 1989 A
4885830 Ohtaka Dec 1989 A
4904222 Gastgeb et al. Feb 1990 A
4906886 Breimesser et al. Mar 1990 A
4911057 Fishman Mar 1990 A
4911995 Belanger et al. Mar 1990 A
4958100 Crawley et al. Sep 1990 A
4961956 Simopoulos et al. Oct 1990 A
4969197 Takaya Nov 1990 A
4971287 Shaw Nov 1990 A
4980597 Iwao Dec 1990 A
4989951 Miyano et al. Feb 1991 A
5024872 Wilson et al. Jun 1991 A
RE33651 Blonder et al. Jul 1991 E
5030874 Saito et al. Jul 1991 A
5048791 Ellison et al. Sep 1991 A
5065067 Todd et al. Nov 1991 A
5076538 Mohr et al. Dec 1991 A
5085401 Botting et al. Feb 1992 A
5090246 Colla et al. Feb 1992 A
5090794 Hatano et al. Feb 1992 A
5100100 Benson et al. Mar 1992 A
5103211 Daoud et al. Apr 1992 A
5119840 Shibata Jun 1992 A
5132582 Hayashi et al. Jul 1992 A
5142510 Rodda Aug 1992 A
5148735 Veletovac Sep 1992 A
5149514 Sanjurjo Sep 1992 A
5153820 MacFarlane et al. Oct 1992 A
5153859 Chatigny et al. Oct 1992 A
5156885 Budd Oct 1992 A
5170089 Fulton Dec 1992 A
5171734 Sanjurjo et al. Dec 1992 A
5172024 Broussoux et al. Dec 1992 A
5188447 Chiang et al. Feb 1993 A
5192197 Culp Mar 1993 A
5199641 Hohm et al. Apr 1993 A
5206557 Bobbio Apr 1993 A
5217355 Hyman et al. Jun 1993 A
5229979 Scheinbeim et al. Jul 1993 A
5232196 Hutchings et al. Aug 1993 A
5240004 Walinsky et al. Aug 1993 A
5244707 Shores Sep 1993 A
5250784 Muller et al. Oct 1993 A
5254296 Perlman Oct 1993 A
5258201 Munn et al. Nov 1993 A
5281885 Watanabe et al. Jan 1994 A
5288551 Sato et al. Feb 1994 A
5291335 Ogino Mar 1994 A
5302318 Dutta et al. Apr 1994 A
5305178 Binder et al. Apr 1994 A
5321332 Toda Jun 1994 A
5350966 Culp Sep 1994 A
5352574 Guiseppi-Elie Oct 1994 A
5356500 Scheinbeim et al. Oct 1994 A
5361240 Pearce Nov 1994 A
5368704 Madou et al. Nov 1994 A
5369995 Scheinbeim et al. Dec 1994 A
5377258 Bro Dec 1994 A
5380396 Shikida et al. Jan 1995 A
5410210 Sato et al. Apr 1995 A
5417235 Wise et al. May 1995 A
5424596 Mendenhall et al. Jun 1995 A
5428523 McDonnal Jun 1995 A
5430565 Yamanouchi et al. Jul 1995 A
5438553 Wilson et al. Aug 1995 A
5440194 Beurrier Aug 1995 A
5452878 Gravesen et al. Sep 1995 A
5481152 Bushulte Jan 1996 A
5488872 McCormick Feb 1996 A
5493372 Mashtare et al. Feb 1996 A
5495137 Park et al. Feb 1996 A
5499127 Tsubota et al. Mar 1996 A
5500635 Mott Mar 1996 A
5504388 Kimura et al. Apr 1996 A
5509888 Miller Apr 1996 A
5515341 Toda et al. May 1996 A
5548177 Carroll Aug 1996 A
5559387 Beurrier Sep 1996 A
5563466 Rennex et al. Oct 1996 A
5571148 Loeb et al. Nov 1996 A
5578889 Epstein Nov 1996 A
5589725 Haertling Dec 1996 A
5591986 Niigaki et al. Jan 1997 A
5593462 Gueguen et al. Jan 1997 A
5630709 Bar-Cohen May 1997 A
5632841 Hellbaum et al. May 1997 A
5636072 Shibata et al. Jun 1997 A
5636100 Zheng et al. Jun 1997 A
5642015 Whitehead et al. Jun 1997 A
5647245 Takei Jul 1997 A
5668703 Rossi et al. Sep 1997 A
5678571 Brown Oct 1997 A
5682075 Bolleman et al. Oct 1997 A
5684637 Floyd Nov 1997 A
5696663 Unami et al. Dec 1997 A
5703295 Ishida et al. Dec 1997 A
5717563 MacDougall et al. Feb 1998 A
5722418 Bro Mar 1998 A
5744908 Kyushima Apr 1998 A
5751090 Henderson May 1998 A
5755909 Gailus May 1998 A
5761782 Sager Jun 1998 A
5766934 Guiseppi-Elie Jun 1998 A
5777540 Dedert et al. Jul 1998 A
5788468 Dewa et al. Aug 1998 A
5798600 Sager et al. Aug 1998 A
5800421 Lemelson Sep 1998 A
5801475 Kimura Sep 1998 A
5814921 Carroll Sep 1998 A
5828157 Miki et al. Oct 1998 A
5831371 Bishop Nov 1998 A
5835453 Wynne et al. Nov 1998 A
5847690 Boie et al. Dec 1998 A
5857694 Lazarus et al. Jan 1999 A
5876675 Kennedy Mar 1999 A
5883466 Suyama et al. Mar 1999 A
5889354 Sager Mar 1999 A
5892314 Sager et al. Apr 1999 A
5896287 Mihara et al. Apr 1999 A
5897097 Biegelsen et al. Apr 1999 A
5900572 Aaroe May 1999 A
5902836 Bennett et al. May 1999 A
5910107 Iliff Jun 1999 A
5912499 Diem et al. Jun 1999 A
5913310 Brown Jun 1999 A
5914901 Pascucci Jun 1999 A
5915377 Coffee Jun 1999 A
5918502 Bishop Jul 1999 A
5928262 Harber Jul 1999 A
5928547 Shea et al. Jul 1999 A
5933170 Takeuchi et al. Aug 1999 A
5961298 Bar-Cohen et al. Oct 1999 A
5964583 Danby Oct 1999 A
5971355 Biegelsen et al. Oct 1999 A
5977685 Kurita et al. Nov 1999 A
5984760 Marine Nov 1999 A
5988902 Holehan Nov 1999 A
6012961 Sharpe, III et al. Jan 2000 A
6037707 Gailus et al. Mar 2000 A
6040356 Kanki et al. Mar 2000 A
6048276 Vandergrift Apr 2000 A
6048622 Hagood, IV et al. Apr 2000 A
6055859 Kozuka et al. May 2000 A
6059546 Brenan et al. May 2000 A
6060811 Fox et al. May 2000 A
6069420 Mizzi et al. May 2000 A
6074178 Bishop et al. Jun 2000 A
6074179 Jokela et al. Jun 2000 A
6075504 Stoller Jun 2000 A
6078126 Rollins et al. Jun 2000 A
6084321 Hunter et al. Jul 2000 A
6089701 Hashizume et al. Jul 2000 A
6093078 Cook Jul 2000 A
6093995 Lazarus et al. Jul 2000 A
6094988 Aindow Aug 2000 A
6097821 Yokoyama et al. Aug 2000 A
6108275 Hughes et al. Aug 2000 A
6111743 Lavene Aug 2000 A
6117396 Demers Sep 2000 A
6130510 Kurihara et al. Oct 2000 A
6133398 Bhat et al. Oct 2000 A
6140131 Sunakawa et al. Oct 2000 A
6140740 Porat et al. Oct 2000 A
6140746 Miyashita et al. Oct 2000 A
6148842 Kappel et al. Nov 2000 A
6156842 Hoenig et al. Dec 2000 A
6157528 Anthony Dec 2000 A
6161966 Chang et al. Dec 2000 A
6165126 Merzenich et al. Dec 2000 A
6168133 Heinz et al. Jan 2001 B1
6181351 Merrill et al. Jan 2001 B1
6184044 Sone et al. Feb 2001 B1
6184608 Cabuz et al. Feb 2001 B1
6184609 Johansson et al. Feb 2001 B1
6184844 Filipovic et al. Feb 2001 B1
6190805 Takeuchi et al. Feb 2001 B1
6194815 Carroll Feb 2001 B1
6196935 Spangler et al. Mar 2001 B1
6198203 Hotomi Mar 2001 B1
6198204 Pottenger Mar 2001 B1
6201398 Takada Mar 2001 B1
6210827 Dopp et al. Apr 2001 B1
6228533 Ohashi et al. May 2001 B1
6232702 Newnham et al. May 2001 B1
6239535 Toda et al. May 2001 B1
6239536 Lakin May 2001 B1
6240814 Boyd et al. Jun 2001 B1
6248262 Kubotera et al. Jun 2001 B1
6249076 Madden et al. Jun 2001 B1
6252221 Kaneko et al. Jun 2001 B1
6252334 Nye et al. Jun 2001 B1
6252336 Hall Jun 2001 B1
6255758 Cabuz et al. Jul 2001 B1
6262516 Fukuda et al. Jul 2001 B1
6268219 McBride et al. Jul 2001 B1
6282074 Anthony Aug 2001 B1
6284435 Cao Sep 2001 B1
6286961 Ogawa Sep 2001 B1
6291155 Raguse et al. Sep 2001 B1
6291928 Lazarus et al. Sep 2001 B1
6294859 Jaenker Sep 2001 B1
6297579 Martin et al. Oct 2001 B1
6311950 Kappel et al. Nov 2001 B1
6316084 Claus et al. Nov 2001 B1
6321428 Toda et al. Nov 2001 B1
6330463 Hedrich Dec 2001 B1
6333595 Horikawa et al. Dec 2001 B1
6334673 Kitahara et al. Jan 2002 B1
6336367 Raeisaenen Jan 2002 B1
6336880 Agner Jan 2002 B1
6339527 Farooq et al. Jan 2002 B1
6343129 Pelrine et al. Jan 2002 B1
6345840 Meyer et al. Feb 2002 B1
6349141 Corsaro Feb 2002 B1
6355185 Kubota Mar 2002 B1
6358021 Cabuz Mar 2002 B1
6359370 Chang Mar 2002 B1
6366193 Duggal et al. Apr 2002 B2
6369954 Berge et al. Apr 2002 B1
6375857 Ng et al. Apr 2002 B1
6376971 Pelrine et al. Apr 2002 B1
6377383 Whitehead et al. Apr 2002 B1
6379393 Marvroidis et al. Apr 2002 B1
6379809 Simpson et al. Apr 2002 B1
6385021 Takeda et al. May 2002 B1
6385429 Weber et al. May 2002 B1
6388043 Langer et al. May 2002 B1
6388553 Shea et al. May 2002 B1
6388856 Anthony May 2002 B1
6400065 Toda et al. Jun 2002 B1
6404107 Lazarus et al. Jun 2002 B1
6411009 Jaenker Jun 2002 B2
6411013 Horning Jun 2002 B1
6424079 Carroll Jul 2002 B1
6429573 Koopmann et al. Aug 2002 B2
6429576 Simes Aug 2002 B1
6433689 Hovind et al. Aug 2002 B1
6434245 Zimmermann Aug 2002 B1
6435840 Sharma et al. Aug 2002 B1
6436531 Kollaja et al. Aug 2002 B1
6437489 Shinke et al. Aug 2002 B1
6457697 Kolze Oct 2002 B1
6459088 Yasuda et al. Oct 2002 B1
6471185 Lewin et al. Oct 2002 B2
6475931 Bower et al. Nov 2002 B2
6486589 Dujari et al. Nov 2002 B1
6492762 Pant et al. Dec 2002 B1
6495945 Yamaguchi et al. Dec 2002 B2
6499509 Berger et al. Dec 2002 B2
6502803 Mattes Jan 2003 B1
6504286 Porat et al. Jan 2003 B1
6509802 Kasperkovitz Jan 2003 B2
6514237 Maseda Feb 2003 B1
6522516 Anthony Feb 2003 B2
6523560 Williams et al. Feb 2003 B1
6528925 Takeuchi et al. Mar 2003 B1
6528928 Burns et al. Mar 2003 B1
6530266 Adderton et al. Mar 2003 B1
6532145 Carlen et al. Mar 2003 B1
6540893 Wakida et al. Apr 2003 B1
6543110 Pelrine et al. Apr 2003 B1
6545384 Pelrine et al. Apr 2003 B1
6562513 Takeuchi et al. May 2003 B1
6583533 Pelrine et al. Jun 2003 B2
6586859 Kornbluh et al. Jul 2003 B2
6590267 Goodwin-Johansson et al. Jul 2003 B1
6593155 Mohler et al. Jul 2003 B2
6613816 Mahdi et al. Sep 2003 B2
6617759 Zumeris et al. Sep 2003 B1
6617765 Lagier et al. Sep 2003 B1
6619799 Blum et al. Sep 2003 B1
6628040 Pelrine et al. Sep 2003 B2
6631068 Lobo Oct 2003 B1
6637276 Adderton et al. Oct 2003 B2
6640402 Vooren et al. Nov 2003 B1
6644027 Kelly Nov 2003 B1
6646077 Lyons Nov 2003 B1
6650455 Miles Nov 2003 B2
6652938 Nishikawa et al. Nov 2003 B1
6654004 Hoggarth Nov 2003 B2
6664718 Pelrine et al. Dec 2003 B2
6668109 Nahum et al. Dec 2003 B2
6673533 Wohlstadter et al. Jan 2004 B1
6680825 Murphy et al. Jan 2004 B1
6682500 Soltanpour et al. Jan 2004 B2
6685442 Chinn et al. Feb 2004 B2
6690101 Magnussen et al. Feb 2004 B2
6700314 Cuhat et al. Mar 2004 B2
6701296 Kramer et al. Mar 2004 B1
6707236 Pelrine et al. Mar 2004 B2
6720710 Wenzel et al. Apr 2004 B1
6733130 Blum et al. May 2004 B2
6743273 Chung et al. Jun 2004 B2
6762050 Fukushima et al. Jul 2004 B2
6768246 Pelrine et al. Jul 2004 B2
6781284 Pelrine et al. Aug 2004 B1
6784227 Simon et al. Aug 2004 B2
6791205 Woodbridge Sep 2004 B2
6796639 Sugahara Sep 2004 B2
6800155 Senecal et al. Oct 2004 B2
6804068 Sasaki et al. Oct 2004 B2
6806621 Heim et al. Oct 2004 B2
6806806 Anthony Oct 2004 B2
6806808 Watters et al. Oct 2004 B1
6809462 Pelrine et al. Oct 2004 B2
6809928 Gwin et al. Oct 2004 B2
6812624 Pei et al. Nov 2004 B1
6824689 Wang et al. Nov 2004 B2
6847153 Balizer Jan 2005 B1
6847155 Schwartz et al. Jan 2005 B2
6856305 Nagano Feb 2005 B2
6864592 Kelly Mar 2005 B1
6866242 Hirota Mar 2005 B2
6867533 Su et al. Mar 2005 B1
6869275 Dante et al. Mar 2005 B2
6876125 Basheer et al. Apr 2005 B2
6876135 Pelrine et al. Apr 2005 B2
6879318 Chan et al. Apr 2005 B1
6882086 Kornbluh et al. Apr 2005 B2
6891317 Pei et al. May 2005 B2
6902048 Chung Jun 2005 B1
6911764 Pelrine et al. Jun 2005 B2
6935287 Shinogle Aug 2005 B2
6938945 Wald et al. Sep 2005 B2
6940211 Pelrine et al. Sep 2005 B2
6940212 Mueller Sep 2005 B2
6940221 Matsukiyo et al. Sep 2005 B2
6944931 Shcheglov et al. Sep 2005 B2
6952313 Schrader Oct 2005 B2
6967430 Johansson Nov 2005 B2
6994314 Garnier et al. Feb 2006 B2
6997870 Couvillon, Jr. Feb 2006 B2
7008838 Hosking et al. Mar 2006 B1
7011378 Maluf et al. Mar 2006 B2
7011760 Wang et al. Mar 2006 B2
7029056 Browne et al. Apr 2006 B2
7034432 Pelrine et al. Apr 2006 B1
7037270 Seward May 2006 B2
7038357 Goldenberg et al. May 2006 B2
7049732 Pei et al. May 2006 B2
7052594 Pelrine et al. May 2006 B2
7062055 Pelrine et al. Jun 2006 B2
7063268 Chrysler et al. Jun 2006 B2
7063377 Brei et al. Jun 2006 B2
7064472 Pelrine et al. Jun 2006 B2
7071596 Krill Jul 2006 B2
7075162 Unger Jul 2006 B2
7075213 Krill Jul 2006 B2
7092238 Saito et al. Aug 2006 B2
7099141 Kaufman et al. Aug 2006 B1
7104146 Benslimane et al. Sep 2006 B2
7109643 Hirai et al. Sep 2006 B2
7113318 Onuki et al. Sep 2006 B2
7113848 Hanson Sep 2006 B2
7115092 Park et al. Oct 2006 B2
7140180 Gerber et al. Nov 2006 B2
7141888 Sabol et al. Nov 2006 B2
7142368 Kim et al. Nov 2006 B2
7142369 Wu et al. Nov 2006 B2
7144616 Unger et al. Dec 2006 B1
7148789 Sadler et al. Dec 2006 B2
7164212 Leijon et al. Jan 2007 B2
7166952 Topliss et al. Jan 2007 B2
7166953 Heim et al. Jan 2007 B2
7170665 Kaneko et al. Jan 2007 B2
7190016 Cahalen et al. Mar 2007 B2
7193350 Blackburn et al. Mar 2007 B1
7195393 Potter Mar 2007 B2
7195950 Taussig Mar 2007 B2
7196688 Schena Mar 2007 B2
7199302 Raisanen Apr 2007 B2
7199501 Pei et al. Apr 2007 B2
7205704 Audren et al. Apr 2007 B2
7205978 Poupyrev et al. Apr 2007 B2
7209280 Goossens Apr 2007 B2
7211937 Kornbluh et al. May 2007 B2
7220785 Saito May 2007 B2
7224106 Pei et al. May 2007 B2
7233097 Rosenthal et al. Jun 2007 B2
7235152 Bell et al. Jun 2007 B2
7237524 Pelrine et al. Jul 2007 B2
7242106 Kelly Jul 2007 B2
7242141 Pschenitzka et al. Jul 2007 B2
7245440 Peseux Jul 2007 B2
7256943 Kobrin et al. Aug 2007 B1
7259495 Asai et al. Aug 2007 B2
7259503 Pei et al. Aug 2007 B2
7276090 Shahinpoor et al. Oct 2007 B2
7291512 Unger Nov 2007 B2
7298054 Hirsch Nov 2007 B2
7298559 Kato et al. Nov 2007 B2
7298603 Mizuno et al. Nov 2007 B2
7301261 Ifuku et al. Nov 2007 B2
7310874 Higuchi et al. Dec 2007 B2
7312917 Jacob Dec 2007 B2
7316794 O/Brien Jan 2008 B2
7320457 Heim et al. Jan 2008 B2
7321185 Schultz Jan 2008 B2
7323790 Taylor et al. Jan 2008 B2
7332688 Browne et al. Feb 2008 B2
7339285 Negron Crespo Mar 2008 B2
7339572 Schena Mar 2008 B2
7342573 Ryynanen Mar 2008 B2
7344763 Kokeguchi et al. Mar 2008 B2
7353747 Swayze et al. Apr 2008 B2
7355293 Bernhoff et al. Apr 2008 B2
7359124 Fang et al. Apr 2008 B1
7362031 Maita et al. Apr 2008 B2
7362032 Pelrine et al. Apr 2008 B2
7362889 Dubowsky et al. Apr 2008 B2
7368862 Pelrine et al. May 2008 B2
7371596 Warner, Jr. et al. May 2008 B2
7373454 Noe May 2008 B1
7378783 Pelrine et al. May 2008 B2
7392876 Browne et al. Jul 2008 B2
7394182 Pelrine et al. Jul 2008 B2
7394282 Sinha et al. Jul 2008 B2
7394641 Won et al. Jul 2008 B2
7397166 Morgan et al. Jul 2008 B1
7401846 Browne et al. Jul 2008 B2
7411332 Kornbluh et al. Aug 2008 B2
7426340 Seo Sep 2008 B2
7429074 McKnight et al. Sep 2008 B2
7429495 Wan Sep 2008 B2
7436099 Pei et al. Oct 2008 B2
7436646 Delince et al. Oct 2008 B2
7442421 Li et al. Oct 2008 B2
7442760 Roberts et al. Oct 2008 B2
7444072 Seo Oct 2008 B2
7446926 Sampsell Nov 2008 B2
7449821 Dausch Nov 2008 B2
7454820 Nakamura Nov 2008 B2
7456549 Heim et al. Nov 2008 B2
7468575 Pelrine et al. Dec 2008 B2
7481120 Gravesen et al. Jan 2009 B2
7482745 Shirogane et al. Jan 2009 B2
7492076 Heim et al. Feb 2009 B2
7498729 Ogino Mar 2009 B2
7499223 Berge et al. Mar 2009 B2
7511706 Schena Mar 2009 B2
7513624 Yavid et al. Apr 2009 B2
7515350 Berge et al. Apr 2009 B2
7518284 Benslimane et al. Apr 2009 B2
7521840 Heim Apr 2009 B2
7521847 Heim Apr 2009 B2
7537197 Heim et al. May 2009 B2
7548015 Benslimane et al. Jun 2009 B2
7548232 Shahoian et al. Jun 2009 B2
7567681 Pelrine et al. Jul 2009 B2
7573064 Benslimane et al. Aug 2009 B2
7585122 Eromaki et al. Sep 2009 B2
7586242 Yokoyama et al. Sep 2009 B2
7595580 Heim Sep 2009 B2
7608989 Heydt et al. Oct 2009 B2
7626319 Heim Dec 2009 B2
7646544 Batchko et al. Jan 2010 B2
7648118 Ukpai et al. Jan 2010 B2
7659918 Turner Feb 2010 B2
7679267 Heim Mar 2010 B2
7679839 Polyakov et al. Mar 2010 B2
7690622 Ito et al. Apr 2010 B2
7702227 Ito et al. Apr 2010 B2
7703740 Franklin Apr 2010 B1
7703742 Heim et al. Apr 2010 B2
7703839 McKnight et al. Apr 2010 B2
7705521 Pelrine et al. Apr 2010 B2
7714701 Altan et al. May 2010 B2
7732999 Clausen et al. Jun 2010 B2
7733575 Heim et al. Jun 2010 B2
7745374 Tanaka et al. Jun 2010 B2
7750532 Heim Jul 2010 B2
7750617 Omi Jul 2010 B2
7761981 Rosenthal et al. Jul 2010 B2
7772745 Kawakubo et al. Aug 2010 B2
7785656 Pei et al. Aug 2010 B2
7787646 Pelrine et al. Aug 2010 B2
7813047 Wang et al. Oct 2010 B2
7824580 Boll et al. Nov 2010 B2
7886993 Bachmaier et al. Feb 2011 B2
7893965 Heim et al. Feb 2011 B2
7898159 Heydt et al. Mar 2011 B2
7911115 Pelrine et al. Mar 2011 B2
7911761 Biggs et al. Mar 2011 B2
7915789 Smith Mar 2011 B2
7915790 Heim et al. Mar 2011 B2
7921541 Pei et al. Apr 2011 B2
7923064 Pelrine et al. Apr 2011 B2
7923902 Heim Apr 2011 B2
7923982 Sumita Apr 2011 B2
7940476 Polyakov et al. May 2011 B2
7952261 Lipton et al. May 2011 B2
7958789 Hayakawa et al. Jun 2011 B2
7971850 Heim et al. Jul 2011 B2
7980671 Nystrom et al. Jul 2011 B2
7986466 Lee et al. Jul 2011 B2
7990022 Heim Aug 2011 B2
7997260 Kaakkola et al. Aug 2011 B2
8004339 Barrow Aug 2011 B2
8007986 Zhang et al. Aug 2011 B2
8026023 Hamada Sep 2011 B2
8033324 Mukasa et al. Oct 2011 B2
8042264 Rosenthal et al. Oct 2011 B2
8049333 Alden et al. Nov 2011 B2
8050601 Lin et al. Nov 2011 B2
8054566 Heim et al. Nov 2011 B2
8056618 Wagner et al. Nov 2011 B2
8058861 Pelrine et al. Nov 2011 B2
8072121 Heim et al. Dec 2011 B2
8074939 Hyde et al. Dec 2011 B2
8093783 Rosenthal et al. Jan 2012 B2
8127437 Lipton et al. Mar 2012 B2
8133932 Kijlstra et al. Mar 2012 B2
8164835 Heim et al. Apr 2012 B2
8172998 Bennett et al. May 2012 B2
8183739 Heim May 2012 B2
8211054 Dewey Jul 2012 B2
8221944 Shirasaki et al. Jul 2012 B2
8222799 Polyakov et al. Jul 2012 B2
8237324 Pei et al. Aug 2012 B2
8248750 Biggs et al. Aug 2012 B2
8258238 Boersma et al. Sep 2012 B2
8283839 Heim Oct 2012 B2
8294600 Peterson et al. Oct 2012 B2
8310444 Peterson et al. Nov 2012 B2
8316526 Pei et al. Nov 2012 B2
8319403 Lipton et al. Nov 2012 B2
8419822 Li Apr 2013 B2
8421316 Tryson et al. Apr 2013 B2
8508109 Pelrine et al. Aug 2013 B2
8545987 Strader et al. Oct 2013 B2
8585007 Schapeler et al. Nov 2013 B2
8594839 Hanson Nov 2013 B2
8679575 Biggs et al. Mar 2014 B2
8679621 Blaiszik et al. Mar 2014 B2
8773373 Sato et al. Jul 2014 B2
8779650 Jenninger et al. Jul 2014 B2
8842355 Lipton et al. Sep 2014 B2
8975888 Pelrine et al. Mar 2015 B2
8981621 Pelrine et al. Mar 2015 B2
RE45464 Kornbluh et al. Apr 2015 E
20010007449 Kobachi et al. Jul 2001 A1
20020083858 MacDiarmid et al. Jul 2002 A1
20030168936 Everingham et al. Sep 2003 A1
20040014860 Meier et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040035472 Teltscher et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040046739 Gettemy Mar 2004 A1
20040124738 Pelrine et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040234401 Banister Nov 2004 A1
20050002113 Berge Jan 2005 A1
20050046312 Miyoshi Mar 2005 A1
20050085693 Belson et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050113892 Sproul May 2005 A1
20050140922 Bekerman et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050200984 Browne et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050238506 Mescher et al. Oct 2005 A1
20060057377 Harrison et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060079619 Wang et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060108416 Hirai May 2006 A1
20060122954 Podlasek et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060138371 Garnier Jun 2006 A1
20060163725 Haba et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060197741 Biggadike Sep 2006 A1
20060238069 Maruyama et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060258912 Belson et al. Nov 2006 A1
20070080435 Lin Apr 2007 A1
20070122132 Misawa et al. May 2007 A1
20070152982 Kim et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070170910 Chang et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070173602 Brinkman et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070189667 Wakita et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070200457 Heim et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070219285 Kropp et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070230222 Drabing et al. Oct 2007 A1
20080043318 Whitesides et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080062589 Drabing Mar 2008 A1
20080143696 Goulthorpe Jun 2008 A1
20080152921 Kropp Jun 2008 A1
20080191832 Tsai Aug 2008 A1
20080264441 Takagi Oct 2008 A1
20080303782 Grant et al. Dec 2008 A1
20090028491 Fillion et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090050829 Haynes et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090104448 Thompson et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090184606 Rosenthal et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090246646 Hamada Oct 2009 A1
20090250021 Zarrabi et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090297829 Pyles et al. Dec 2009 A1
20100006827 Buckley Jan 2010 A1
20100236843 Englund Sep 2010 A1
20100265031 Yen Oct 2010 A1
20110021917 Morita Jan 2011 A1
20110128239 Polyakov et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110155307 Pelrine et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110256383 Cochet et al. Oct 2011 A1
20110285247 Lipton et al. Nov 2011 A1
20120128960 Büsgen May 2012 A1
20140014715 Moran et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140176753 Hillis et al. Jun 2014 A1
20140290834 Egron et al. Oct 2014 A1
20140319971 Yoo et al. Oct 2014 A1
20140322522 Yoo Oct 2014 A1
20140352879 Yoo et al. Dec 2014 A1
20150009009 Zarrabi et al. Jan 2015 A1
20150034237 Biggs et al. Feb 2015 A1
20150043095 Lipton et al. Feb 2015 A1
20150070740 Zarrabi et al. Mar 2015 A1
20150084483 Yoo et al. Mar 2015 A1
20150221851 Biggs et al. Aug 2015 A1
20150221852 Biggs et al. Aug 2015 A1
20150221861 Biggs et al. Aug 2015 A1
20150231802 Quan et al. Aug 2015 A1
20160025429 Muir et al. Jan 2016 A1
20160204338 Schmeer et al. Jul 2016 A1
20160208944 Muir et al. Jul 2016 A1
20160230904 Zarrabi et al. Aug 2016 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (173)
Number Date Country
2329804 Nov 1999 CA
2330384 Nov 1999 CA
2769441 Feb 2011 CA
1447365 Oct 2003 CN
2535833 Feb 1977 DE
4408618 Sep 1995 DE
19636909 Mar 1998 DE
19952062 May 2000 DE
10058096 Jun 2002 DE
10161349 Jul 2003 DE
10335019 Feb 2005 DE
0196839 Oct 1986 EP
0295907 Dec 1988 EP
0154473 May 1992 EP
0522882 Jan 1993 EP
0833182 Apr 1998 EP
0980103 Feb 2000 EP
1050955 Nov 2000 EP
1090835 Apr 2001 EP
1323925 Jul 2004 EP
1528609 May 2005 EP
1698876 Sep 2006 EP
1843406 Oct 2007 EP
1976036 Oct 2008 EP
2119747 Nov 2009 EP
2511314 Oct 2012 EP
2208461 Jun 1974 FR
2745476 Sep 1997 FR
2338513 Dec 1999 GB
2470006 Nov 2010 GB
S 5181120 Jul 1976 JP
S 52120840 Oct 1977 JP
S 5445593 Apr 1979 JP
S 5542474 Mar 1980 JP
S 5565569 May 1980 JP
S 5661679 May 1981 JP
S 56101788 Aug 1981 JP
S 59126689 Jul 1984 JP
S 6199499 May 1986 JP
S 61239799 Oct 1986 JP
S 6397100 Apr 1988 JP
H 02162214 Jun 1990 JP
02222019 Sep 1990 JP
03173022 Jul 1991 JP
H 05244782 Sep 1993 JP
H 07111785 Apr 1995 JP
H 07240544 Sep 1995 JP
H 09275688 Oct 1997 JP
H 10137655 May 1998 JP
H 10207616 Aug 1998 JP
H 10321482 Dec 1998 JP
H 112764 Jan 1999 JP
11134109 May 1999 JP
H 11133210 May 1999 JP
2000-081504 Mar 2000 JP
2000-331874 Nov 2000 JP
2001-130774 May 2001 JP
2001-136598 May 2001 JP
2001-286162 Oct 2001 JP
2001-291906 Oct 2001 JP
2003-040041 Feb 2003 JP
3501216 Mar 2004 JP
2004-516966 Jun 2004 JP
2004-205827 Jul 2004 JP
2004-221742 Aug 2004 JP
2004-296154 Oct 2004 JP
2004-353279 Dec 2004 JP
2005-001885 Jan 2005 JP
2005-202707 Jul 2005 JP
3709723 Aug 2005 JP
2005-260236 Sep 2005 JP
2006-048302 Feb 2006 JP
2006-509052 Mar 2006 JP
2006-178434 Jul 2006 JP
2006-244490 Sep 2006 JP
2007-206362 Aug 2007 JP
2007-287670 Nov 2007 JP
2008-262955 Oct 2008 JP
2008-277729 Nov 2008 JP
2009-077618 Apr 2009 JP
2009-249313 Oct 2009 JP
2010-273524 Dec 2010 JP
5415442 Feb 2014 JP
2004-0097921 Dec 2004 KR
10-0607839 Aug 2006 KR
10-0650190 Nov 2006 KR
2008-0100757 Nov 2008 KR
2010-0121801 Nov 2010 KR
20110122244 Nov 2011 KR
I1269615 Dec 2006 TW
I272194 Feb 2007 TW
WO 8707218 Dec 1987 WO
WO 8902658 Mar 1989 WO
WO 9418433 Aug 1994 WO
WO 9508905 Mar 1995 WO
WO 9626364 Aug 1996 WO
WO 9715876 May 1997 WO
WO 9819208 May 1998 WO
WO 9835529 Aug 1998 WO
WO 9845677 Oct 1998 WO
WO 9917929 Apr 1999 WO
WO 9923749 May 1999 WO
WO 9937921 Jul 1999 WO
WO 0101025 Jan 2001 WO
WO 0106575 Jan 2001 WO
WO 0106579 Jan 2001 WO
WO 0158973 Aug 2001 WO
WO 0159852 Aug 2001 WO
WO 0191100 Nov 2001 WO
WO 0237660 May 2002 WO
WO 0237892 May 2002 WO
WO 02071505 Sep 2002 WO
WO 03056274 Jul 2003 WO
WO 03056287 Jul 2003 WO
WO 03081762 Oct 2003 WO
WO 03107523 Dec 2003 WO
WO 2004009363 Jan 2004 WO
WO 2004027970 Apr 2004 WO
WO 2004053782 Jun 2004 WO
WO 2004074797 Sep 2004 WO
WO 2004079832 Sep 2004 WO
WO 2004086289 Oct 2004 WO
WO 2004093763 Nov 2004 WO
WO 2005027161 Mar 2005 WO
WO 2005053002 Jun 2005 WO
WO 2005079187 Sep 2005 WO
WO 2005079353 Sep 2005 WO
WO 2005081676 Sep 2005 WO
WO 2005086249 Sep 2005 WO
WO 2006040532 Apr 2006 WO
WO 2006071419 Jul 2006 WO
WO 2006102273 Sep 2006 WO
WO 2006121818 Nov 2006 WO
WO 2006123317 Nov 2006 WO
WO 2007018877 Feb 2007 WO
WO 2007029275 Mar 2007 WO
WO 2007072411 Jun 2007 WO
WO 2008039658 Apr 2008 WO
WO 2008052559 May 2008 WO
WO 2008105861 Sep 2008 WO
WO 2008150817 Dec 2008 WO
WO 2009006318 Jan 2009 WO
WO 2009056497 May 2009 WO
WO 2009076477 Jun 2009 WO
WO 2009112988 Sep 2009 WO
WO 2010054014 May 2010 WO
WO 2010104953 Sep 2010 WO
WO 2010115549 Oct 2010 WO
WO 2011097020 Aug 2011 WO
WO 2011118315 Sep 2011 WO
WO 2012032437 Mar 2012 WO
WO 2012044419 Apr 2012 WO
WO 2012099854 Jul 2012 WO
WO 2012118916 Sep 2012 WO
WO 2012129357 Sep 2012 WO
WO 2012148644 Nov 2012 WO
WO 2013044195 Mar 2013 WO
WO 2013055733 Apr 2013 WO
WO 2013103470 Jul 2013 WO
WO 2013142552 Sep 2013 WO
WO 2013155377 Oct 2013 WO
WO 2014028819 Feb 2014 WO
WO 2014028822 Feb 2014 WO
WO 2014028825 Feb 2014 WO
WO 2014062776 Apr 2014 WO
WO 2014066576 May 2014 WO
WO 2014074554 May 2014 WO
WO 2014089388 Jun 2014 WO
WO 2014187976 Nov 2014 WO
WO 2015020698 Feb 2015 WO
WO 2015051291 Apr 2015 WO
WO 2015126928 Aug 2015 WO
WO 2015126928 Dec 2015 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (189)
Entry
International Search Report for PCT/US2013/046248, dated Nov. 15, 2013 (7 pages).
Ajluni, Cheryl, “Pressure Sensors Strive to Stay on Top, New Silicon Micromachining Techniques and Designs Promise Higher Performance,” Electronic Design—Advanced Technology Series, Oct. 3, 1994, pp. 67-74.
Akle, Barbar J., et al., “Ionic Electroactive Hybrid Transducers,” Smart Structures and Materials 2005: Electroactive Polymer Actuators and Devices (EAPAD), Proceedings of SPIE, Bellingham, WA, vol. 5759, 2005, pp. 153-164.
Anderson, R.A., “Mechanical Stress in a Delectric Solid From a Uniform Electric Field,” The American Physical Society, 1986, pp. 1302-1307.
Aramaki, S., S. Kaneko, K. Arai, Y. Takahashi, H. Adachi, and K. Yanagisawa. 1995. “Tube Type Micro Manipulator Using Shape Memory Alloy (SMA),” Proceedings of the IEEE Sixth International Symposium on Micro Machine and Human Science, Nagoya, Japan, pp. 115-120.
Ashley, S., “Artificial Muscles”, Scientific American 2003, pp. 53-59.
Ashley, S., “Smart Skis and Other Adaptive Structures,” Mechanical Engineering, Nov. 1995, pp. 77-81.
Bar-Cohen, Yoseph, JPL, WorldWide ElectroActive Polymers, EAP (Artifical Muscles) Newsletter, vol. 1, No. 1, Jun. 1999.
Bar-Cohen, Yoseph, JPL, WorldWide ElectroActive Polymers, EAP (Artifical Muscles) Newsletter, vol. 1, No. 2, Dec. 1999.
Bar-Cohen, Yoseph, JPL, WorldWide ElectroActive Polymers, EAP (Artifical Muscles) Newsletter, vol. 2, No. 1, Jul. 2000.
Bar-Cohen, Yoseph, JPL, WorldWide ElectroActive Polymers, EAP (Artifical Muscles) Newsletter, vol. 2, No. 2, Dec. 2000.
Bar-Cohen, Yoseph, JPL, WorldWide ElectroActive Polymers, EAP (Artifical Muscles) Newsletter, vol. 3, No. 1, Jun. 2001.
Bar-Cohen, Yoseph, JPL, WorldWide ElectroActive Polymer Actuators Webhub webpages 1-7, http://ndeaa.jpl.nasa.gov/nasa-nde/lommas/eap/EAP-web.htm, downloaded Jul. 23, 2001 (7 pages).
Baughman, R., L. Shacklette, R. Elsenbaumer, E. Plichta, and C. Becht “Conducting Polymer Electromechanical Actuators,” Conjugated Polymeric Materials: Opportunities in Electronics, Optoelectronics and Molecular Electronics, eds. J.L. Bredas and R.R. Chance, Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands, pp. 559-582, 1990.
Baughman, R.H., L.W. Shacklette, R.L. Elsenbaumer, E.J. Plichta, and C. Becht “Micro electromechanical actuators based on conducting polymers,” in Molecular Electronics, Materials and Methods, P.I. Lazarev (ed.), Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 267-289 (1991).
Beckett, J., “New Robotics Tap the Mind, Help the Heart, SRI shows of latest technologies,” San Francisco Chronicle, Aug. 27, 1998.
Begley, M. et al., “The Electro-Mechanical Response to Highly Compliant Substrates and Thin Stiff Films with Periodic Cracks,” International Journal of Solids and Structures, 42:5259-5273, 2005.
Benslimane, M and P. Gravesen, “Mechanical Properties of Dielectric Elastomer Actuators with Smart Metallic Compliant Electrodes,” Proceedings of SPIE, International Society for Optical Engineering, vol. 4695, Jan. 1, 2002, pp. 150-157.
Bharti, V., Y. Ye, T.-B. Xu and Q.M. Zhang, “Correlation Between Large Electrostrictive Strain and Relaxor Behavior with Structural Changes Induced in P(VDF-TrFE) Copolymer by Electron Irradiation,” Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. vol. 541, pp. 653-659 (1999).
Bharti, V., Z.-Y.Cheng S. Gross, T.-B. Xu and Q.M. Zhang, “High Electrostrictive Strain Under High Mechanical Stress in Electron-Irradiated Poly(vinylidene fluoride-trifluoroethylene) Copolymer,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 75, No. 17, pp. 2653-2655 (Oct. 25, 1999).
Bharti, V., H.S. Xu, G. Shanthi and Q.M. Zhang, “Polarization and Structural Properties of High Energy Electron Irradiated Poly(vinylidene fluoride-trifluoroethylene) Copolymer Films,” to be published in J. Appl. Phys. (2000).
Bharti, V.,X.-Z. Zhao, Q.M. Zhang, T. Romotowski, F. Tito, and R. Ting, “Ultrahigh Field Induced Strain and Polarization Response in Electron Irradiated Poly(Vinylidene Fluoride-Trifluoroethylene) Copolymer,” Mat. Res. Innovat. vol. 2, pp. 57-63 (1998).
Biomimetic Products, Inc., hhtp://www.biomimetic.com, Jun. 6, 2001.
Bobbio, S., M. Kellam, B. Dudley, S. Goodwin Johansson, S. Jones, J. Jacobson, F. Tranjan, and T. DuBois, “Integrated Force Arrays,” in Proc. IEEE Micro Electro Mechanical Systems Workshop, Fort Lauderdale, Florida, Feb. 7-10, 1993, pp. 146-154.
Bohon, K. and S. Krause, “An Electrorheological Fluid and Siloxane Gel Based Electromechanical Actuator: Working Toward an Artificial Muscle,” to be published in J. Polymer Sci., Part B. Polymer Phys. (2000).
Boyle, W. et al., “Departure from Paschen's Law of Breakdown in Gases,” The Physical Review, Second Series, 97(2): 255-259, Jan. 15, 1955.
Brock, D.L., “Review of Artifical Muscle based on Contractile Polymers,” MIT Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, A.I. Memo No. 1330, Nov. 1991.
Caldwell, D., G. Medrano-Cerda, and M. Goodwin, “Characteristics and Adaptive Control of Pneumatic Muscle Actuators for a Robotic Elbow,” Proc. IEEE Int. Conference on Robotics and Automation, San Diego, California (May 8-13, 1994).
Calvert, P. and Z. Liu, “Electrically Stimulated Bilayer Hydrogels as Muscles,” Proceedings of the SPIE International Symposium on Smart Structures and Materials: Electro-Active Plymer Actuators and Devices, Mar. 1-2, 1999, Newport Beach, California, USA, pp. 236-241.
Campolo, D., et al., “Efficient Charge Recovery Method for Driving Piezoelectric Actuators with Quasi-Square Waves,” IEEE Transaction on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control, IEE, US, vol. 50, No. 3, Mar. 1, 2003, pp. 237-244.
Chen et al., “Active control of low-frequency sound radiation from vibrating panel using planar sound sources,” Journal of Vibration and Acoustics, vol. 124, pp. 2-9, Jan. 2002.
Chen, Zheng et al., “Quasi-Static Positioning of Ionic Polymer-Metal Composite (IPMC) Actuators,” Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE/ASME International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics, Monterey, California, Jul. 24-28, 2005, pp. 60-65.
Cheng, Z.-Y., H.S. Xu, J. Su, Q. M. Zhjang, P.-C. Wang and A.G. MacDiarmid, “High Performance of All-Polymer Electrostrictive Systems,” Proceedings of the SPIE Ineternational Symposium on Smart Structures and Materials: Electro-Active Polymer Actuators and Devices, Mar. 1-2, 1999, Newport Beach, California, USA, pp. 140-148.
Cheng, Z.-Y., T.-B. Xu, V. Bharti, S. Wang, and Q.M. Zhang, “Transverse Strain Responses in the Electrostrictive Poly(Vinylidene Fluoride-Trifluorethylene) Copolymer,” Appl. Phs. Lett. vol. 74, No. 13, pp. 1901-1903, Mar. 29, 1999.
Chiarelli, P., A. Della Santa, D. DeRossi, and A. Mazzoldi, “Actuation Properties of Electrochemically Driven Polypyrrole Free-Standing Films,” Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures, vol. 6, pp. 32-37, Jan. 1995.
Delille, R. et al., “Novel Compliant Electrodes Based on Platinum Salt Reduction,” Smart Structures and Materials 2006: Electroactive Polymer Actuators and Devices (EAPAD), edited by Yoseph Bar-Cohen, Proceedings of SPIE, 6168 (6168Q), 2006.
De Rossi, D., and P. Chiarelli, “Biomimetic Macromolecular Actuators,” Macro-Ion Characterization, American Chemical Society Symposium Series, vol. 548, Ch. 40, pp. 517-530 (1994).
Dowling, K., Beyond Faraday—NonTraditional Actuation, available on the World Wide Web at http://www.frc.ri.cmu.edu/˜nivek/OTH/beyond-faraday/beyondfaraday.html, 9 pages, 1994.
Egawa, S. and T. Higuchi, “Multi-Layered Electrostatic Film Actuator,” Proc. IEEE Micro Electra Mechanical Systems, Napa Valley, California, pp. 166-171 (Feb. 11-14, 1990).
Elhami, K. B. Gauthier-Manuel, “Electrostriction of the Copolymer of Vinylidene-Fluoride and Trifluoroethylene,” J. Appl. Phys. vol. 77 (8), 3987-3990, Apr. 15, 1995.
Flynn, Anita M., L.S. Tavrow, S.F. Bart, R.A. Brooks, D.J. Ehrlich, Kr.R. Udayakumar, and L.E. Cross. 1992. “Piezoelectric Micromotors for Microrobots,” IEEE Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems, vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 44-51 (Mar. 1992); also published as MIT AI Laboratory Memo 1269, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (Feb. 1991).
Ford, V. and J. Kievet, “Technical Support Package on Traveling-Wave Rotary Actuators”, NASA Tech Brief, vol. 21, No. 10, Item #145, from JPL New Technology Report NPO-19261, Oct. 1997.
Full, R.J. and K. Meijer, “Artificial Muscles Versus Natural Actuators from Frogs to Flies,” Proceedings of the 7th SPIE Symposium on Smart Structures and Materials—Electroactive Polymers and Devices (EAPAD) Conference, Mar. 6-8, 2000, Newport Beach, California, USA, pp. 2-9.
Furuhata, T., T. Hirano, and H. Fujita, “Array-Driven Ultrasonic Microactuators,” Solid State Sensors and Actuators, 1991, Digest of Tech. Papers, Transducers, pp. 1056-1059.
Furukawa, T. and N. Seo, “Electrostriction as the Origin of Piezoelectricity in Ferroelectric Polymers,” Japanese J. Applied Physics, vol. 29, No. 4, pp. 675-680 (Apr. 1990).
Gardner, J.W., “Microsensors: Principles and Applications,” John Wiley, 1994.
Ghaffarian, S.R., et al., “Electrode Structures in High Strain Actuator Technology,” Journal of Optoelectronics and Advanced Materials, Nov. 2007, 9(11), pp. 3585-3591.
Gilbertson, R.G. and J.D. Busch. “Survey of MicroActuator Technologies for Future Spacecraft Missions,” presented a the conference entitled “Practical Robotic Interstellar Flight: Are We Ready?” New York University and The United Nations, New York. (Aug. 29 and Sep. 1, 1994); also published on the World Wide Web at http://nonothinc.com/nanosci/microtech/mems/ten-actuators/gilbertson.html.
Goldberg, Lee, “Adaptive-Filtering Developments Extend Noise-Cancellation Applications,” Electronic Design, Feb. 6, 1995, pp. 34 and 36.
Greene, M. J.A. Willett, and R. Kornbluh, “Robotic Systems,” in ONR Report 32198-2, Ocean Engineering and Marine Systems 1997 Program (Dec. 1997).
Greenland, P. Allegro Microsystems Inc., and B. Carsten, Bruce Carsten Associates, “Stacked Flyback Converters Allow Lower Voltage MOSFETs for High AC Line Voltage Operation,” Feature PCIM Article, PCIM, Mar. 2000.
Hansen, G., “High Aspect Ratio Sub-Micron and Nano-Scale Metal Filaments,” SAMPE Journal, 41(2): 24-33, 2005.
Heydt, R., R. Pelrine, J. Joseph, J. Eckerle, and R. Kornbluh, “Acoustical Performance of an Electrostrictive Polymer Film Loudspeaker,” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 107(2), pp. 833-839 (Feb. 2000).
Heydt, R., R. Kornbluh, R. Pelrine, and B. Mason, “Design and Performance of an Electrostrictive Polymer Film Acoustic Actuator,” Journal of Sound and Vibration (1998) 215(2), 297-311.
Hirano, M., K. Yanagisawa, H. Kuwano, and S. Nakano, “Microvalve with Ultra-Low Leakage,” Tenth Annual International Workshop on Micro Electromechanical Systems, Nagoya, Japan, IEEE Proceedings (Jan. 26-30, 1997), pp. 323-326.
Hirose, S., Biologically Inspired Robots: Snake-like Locomotors and Manipulators, “Development of the ACM as a Manipulator,” Oxford University Press, New York, 1993, pp. 170-172.
http://www.neurosupplies.com/pdf—files/transducers.pdf, printed from web Jul. 25, 2001.
Huang, Cheng et al., “Colossal Dielectric and Electromechanical Responses in Self-Assembled Polymeric Nanocomposites”, Applied Physics Letters 87, 182901 (2005), pp. 182901-1 through 182901-3.
Hunter, I.W. and S. Lafontaine, “A Comparison of Muscle with Artificial Actuators,” Technical Digest of the IEEE Solid-State Sensor and Actuator Workshop, Hilton Head, South Carolina, Jun. 22-25, 1992, pp. 178-185.
Hunter, I., S. Lafontaine, J. Hollerbach, and P. Hunter, “Fast Reversible NiTi Fibers for Use in MicroRobotics,” Proc. 1991 IEEE Micro Electro Mechanical Systems—MEMS '91, Nara, Japan, pp. 166-170.
Jacobsen, S., R. Price, J. Wood, T. Rytting and M. Rafaelof, “A Design Overview of an Eccentric-Motion Electrostatic Microactuator (the Wobble Motor)”, Sensors and Actuators, 20 (1989) pp. 1-16.
Joseph, J., R. Pelrine, J. Eckerle, J. Bashkin, and P. Mulgaonkar, “Micro Electrochemical Composite Sensor”, SRI International, printed from web Jul. 25, 2001.
Kaneto, K., M. Kaneko, Y. Min, and A.G. MacDiarmid, “Artifical Muscle: Electromechanical Actuators Using Polyaniline Films,” Synthetic Metals 71, pp. 2211-2212, 1995.
Kawamura, S., K. Minani, and M. Esashi, “Fundamental Research of Distributed Electrostatic Micro Actuator,” Technical Digest of the 11th Sensor Symposium, pp. 27-30 (1992).
Khuri-Yakub et al., “Silicon micromachined ultrasonic transducers,” Japan Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 39 (2000), pp. 2883-2887, Par 1, No. 5B, May 2000.
Kinsler et al., Fundamentals of Acoustics, Third Edition, John Wiley and Sons, 1982.
Kondoh, Y., and T. Ono. 1991. “Bimorph Type Actuators using Lead Zinc Niobate-based Ceramics,” Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 30, No. 9B, pp. 2260-2263, Sep. 1991.
Kornbluh, R., R. Pelrine, R. Heydt, and Q. Pei, “Acoustic Actuators Based on the Field-Activated Deformation of Dielectric Elastomers,” (2000).
Kornbluh, R., G. Andeen, and J. Eckerle, “Artificial Muscle: The Next Generation of Robotic Actuators,” presented at the Fourth World Conference on Robotics Research, SME Paper M591-331, Pittsburgh, PA, Sep. 17-19, 1991.
Kornbluh, R., “Description of Children's Tour,” Aug. 20, 2000.
Kornbluh, R. D and R. E. Pelrine., “Dexterous Multiarticulated Manipulator with Electrostrictive Polymer Artificial Muscle,” ITAD-7247-QR-96-175, SRI Project No. 7247, Prepared for Office of Naval Research, Nov. 1996.
Kornbluh, R., R. Pelrine, J. Joseph, “Elastomeric Dielectric Artificial Muscle Actuators for Small Robots,” Proceedings of the Third IASTED International Conference on Robotics and Manufacturing, Jun. 14-16, 1995, Cancun, Mexico.
Kornbluh, R., R. Pelrine, Q. Pei, and V. Shastri “Electroactive Polymer (EAP) Actuators as Artificial Muscles—Reality, Potential and Challenges”, Chapter 16, Application of Dielectric EAP Actuators, SPIE Press, May 2001.
Kornbluh, R. et al., “Electroactive polymers: An emerging technology for MEMS,” (invited) in MEMS/MOEMS Components and Their Applications, eds. S. Janson, W. Siegfried, and A. Henning, Proc. SPIE, 5344:13-27, 2004.
Kornbluh, R. et al., “Electroelastomers: Applications of dielectric elastomer transducers for actuation, generation and smart structures,” Smart Structures and Materials 2002: Industrial and Commercial Applications of Smart Structures Technologies, ed., A. McGowan, Proc. SPIE, 4698:254-270, 2002.
Kornbluh, R., Pelrine, R., Eckerie, J., Joseph, J., “Electrostrictive Polymer Artificial Muscle Actuators,” IEEE International Conference on Robotic and Automation, Leuven, Belgium, 1998.
Kornbluh, R., R. Pelrine, Jose Joseph, Richard Heydt, Qibing Pei, Seiki Chiba, 1999. “High-Field Electrostriction of Elastomeric Polymer Dielectrics for Actuation”, Proceedings of the SPIE International Symposium on Smart Structures and Materials: Electro-Active Polymer Actuators and Devices, Mar. 1-2, 1999, Newport Beach, California, USA. pp. 149-161.
Kornbluh et al., “Medical Applications of New Electroactive Polymer Artificial Muscles,” SRI International, Menlo Park, CA, JSPP, v. 16, 2004.
Kornbluh, Roy D., Robotic Systems, Ocean Engineering and Marine Systems, 2000 Program, Jan. 2001, Office of Naval Research Public Release, ONR-32100-1.
Kornbluh, Roy D., Robotic Systems, Ocean Engineering and Marine Systems, 1999 Program, Feb. 2000, Office of Naval Research Public Release, ONR-32100-2.
Kornbluh, Roy D., Robotic Systems, Ocean Engineering and Marine Systems, 1997 Program, Dec. 1997, Office of Naval Research Public Release, ONR-32198-2.
Kornbluh, Roy D., Robotic Systems, Ocean Engineering and Marine Systems, 1998 Program, Feb. 1999, Office of Naval Research Public Release, ONR-32199-4.
Kornbluh, R., “Presentation to Colin Corporation”, Jan. 1997.
Kornbluh, R. Presentation to Medtronic, “Elastomeric Polymer Actuator and Transducers: The Principles, Performance and Applications of a New High-Strain Smart Material Technology”, SRI International Medtronic Forum, Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, Jan. 2000.Jan. 2000.
Kornbluh, R. et al., “Shape control of large lightweight mirrors with dielectric elastomer actuation,” Actuation Smart Structures and Materials 2003: Electroactive Polymer Actuators and Devices, ed. Y. Bar-Cohen, Proc. SPIE, 5051, 2003.
Kornbluh, R., Pelrine, R. Joseph, J., Pei, Q. and Chiba., “Ultra-High Strain Response of Elastomeric Polymer Dielectrics”, Proc. Materials Res. Soc., Fall meeting, Boston, MA, pp. 1-12, Dec. 1999.
Kornbluh, R., R. Pelrine, Q. Pei, S. Oh, and J. Joseph, 2000. “Ultrahigh Strain Response of Field-Actuated Elastomeric Polymers,” Proceedings of the 7th SPIE Symposium on Smart Structures and Materials—Electroactive Polymers and Devices (EAPAD) Conference, Mar. 6-8, 2000, Newport Beach, California, USA, pp. 51-64.
Kornbluh, R., “Use of Artificial Muscle Butterfly for Chronicle Newpaper Photograph,” Aug. 1998.
Ktech's PVDF Sensors, http://www.ktech.com/pvdf.htm, Jun. 6, 2001, pp. 1-5.
Kymissis et al., “Parasitic Power Harvesting in Shoes,” XP-010312825—Abstract, Physics and Media Group, MIT Media Laboratory E15-410, Cambridge, MA, Oct. 19, 1998, pp. 132-139.
Lacour, S. et al., “Mechanisms of Reversible Stretchability of Thin Metal Films on Elastomeric Substrates,” Applied Physics Letters 88, 204103, 2006.
Lacour, S. et al., “Stretchable Interconnects for Elastic Electronic Surfaces,” Proceedings of the IEEE on Flexible Electronics Technology, 93(8): 1459-1467, 2005.
Lakes, R.S., “Extreme damping in compliant composites with a negative stiffness phase” or “Extreme Damping in Composite Materials with Negative Stiffness Inclusions”, Nature, 410, 565-567, Mar. 2001.
Lakes, R.S., “Extreme damping in compliant composites with a negative stiffness phase”, Philosophical Magazine Letters, 81, 95-100 (2001).
Lakes, R.S., “Extreme damping in compliant composites with a negative stiffness phase” or “Extreme Damping in Composite Materials with a Negative Stiffness Phase”, Physical Review Letters, 86, 2897-2900, Mar. 26, 2001.
Lang, J, M. Schlect, and R. Howe, “Electric Micromotors: Electromechanical Characteristics,” Proc. IEEE Micro Robots and Teleoperators Workshop, Hyannis, Massachusetts (Nov. 9-11, 1987).
Lawless, W. and R. Arenz, “Miniature Solid-state Gas Compressor,” Rev. Sci Instrum., 58(8), pp. 1487-1493, Aug. 1987.
Liu, C., Y. Bar-Cohen, and S. Leary, “Electro-statically stricted polymers (ESSP),” Proceedings of the SPIE International Symposium on Smart Structures and Materials: Electro-Active Polymer Actuators and Devices, Mar. 1-2, 1999, Newport Beach, California, USA., pp. 186-190.
Liu, C. & Y. Bar-Cohen, “Scaling Laws of Microactuators and Potential Aplications of Elecroactive Polymers in MEMS”, SPIE, Conference on Electroactive Polymer Actuators and Devices, Newport Beach, CA Mar. 1999.
Liu, Y., T. Zeng, Y.X. Wang, H. Yu, and R. Claus, “Self-Assembled Flexible Electrodes on Electroactive Polymer Actuators,” Proceedings of the SPIE International Symposium on Smart Structures and Materials: Electro-Active Polymer Actuators and Devices, Mar. 1-2, 1999, Newport Beach, California, USA., pp. 284-288.
Madden et al., “Conducting polymer actuators as engineering materials,” SPIE: Smart Materials and Structures, ed. Yoseph Bar-Cohen, Bellingham, WA, pp. 176-190, Pub 2002.
Madden, J.D. et al., “Fast contracting polypyrrole actuators”, Jan. 6, 2000, Elsevier Science S.A., pp. 185-192.
Martin, J. and R. Anderson, 1999. “Electrostriction in Field-Structured Composites: Basis for a Fast Artificial Muscle?”, The Journal of Chemical Physics, vol. 111, No. 9, pp. 4273-4280, Sep. 1, 1999.
Measurements Specialties, Inc.—Piezo Home, http://www.msiusa.com/piezo/index.htm, Jun. 6, 2001.
Möller, S. et al., A Polymer/semiconductor write-once read-many-times memory, Nature, vol. 26, Nov. 13, 2003, pp. 166-169, Nature Publishing Group.
Nguyen, T.B., C.K. DeBolt, S.V. Shastri and A. Mann, “Advanced Robotic Search,” in ONR Ocean, Atmosphere, and Space Fiscal Year 1999 Annual Reports (Dec. 1999).
Nguyen, T., J. A. Willett and Kornbluh, R., “Robotic systems,” in ONR Ocean, Atmosphere, and Space Fiscal Year 1998 Annual Reports (Dec. 1998).
Nguyen, T., Green, M., and Kornbluh, R., “Robotic Systems,” in ONR Ocean, Atmosphere, and Space Fiscal Year 1999 Annual Reports (Dec. 1999).
Nguyen, T., Green, M., and Kornbluh, R., “Robotic Systems,” in ONR Ocean, Atmosphere, and Space Fiscal Year 2000 Annual Reports (Jan. 2001). (Cited in U.S. Pat. No. 7,211,937).
Nihon Kohden Corporation, Operators Manual, available Oct. 1, 2001.
NXT plc, Huntingdon, UK (www.nxtsound.com) Sep. 17, 2008.
Ohara, K., M. Hennecke, and J. Fuhrmann, “Electrostriction of polymethylmethacrylates,” Colloid & Polymer Sci. vol. 280, 164-168 (1982).
Olsson, A., G. Stemme, and E. Stemme, “The First Valve-less Diffuser Gas Pump,” Tenth Annual International Workshop on Micro Electromechanical Systems, Nagoya, Japan, IEEE Proceedings (Jan. 26-30, 1997), pp. 108-113.
Olsson, A., O. Larsson, J. Holm, L. Lundbladh, O. Ohinan, and G. Stemme. 1997. “Valve-less Diffuser Micropumps Fabricated using Thermoplastic Replication,” Proc. IEEE Micro Electro Mechanical Systems, Nagoya, Japan, pp. 305-310 (Jan. 26-30, 1997).
Osterbacka, R. et al., “Two-Dimensional Electronic Excitations in Self-Assembled Conjugated Polymer Nanocrystals,” Science, vol. 287:839-842, Feb. 4, 2000.
Otero, T.F., J. Rodriguez, E. Angulo and C. Santamaria, “Artificial Muscles from Bilayer Structures,” Synthetic Metals, vol. 55-57, pp. 3713-3717 (1993).
Otero, T.F., J. Rodriguez, and C. Santamaria, “Smart Muscle Under Electrochemical Control of Molecular Movement in Polypyrrole Films,” Materials Research Society Symposium Proceedings, vol. 330, pp. 333-338, 1994.
Park, S.E., and T. Shrout., “Ultrahigh Strain and Piezoelectric Behavior in Relaxor Based Ferroelectric Single Crystals,” J. Appl. Phys., vol. 82, No. 4, pp. 1804-1811, Aug. 15, 1997.
Pei, Q., O. Inganäs, and I. Lundström, “Bending Bilayer Strips Built From Polyaniline for Artificial Electrochemical Muscles,” Smart Materials and Structures, vol. 2, pp. 1-6., Jan. 22, 1993.
Pei, Qibing “Description of Conference Demonstration” Mar. 2001.
Pei et al., “Electrochemical Applications of the Bending Beam Method. 1. Mass Transport and Volume Changes in Polypyrrole During Redox,” J. Phys. Chem., 1992, 96, pp. 10507-10514.
Pei, Q. et al., “Multifunctional Electroelastomer Roll Actuators and Their Application for Biomimetic Walking Robots,” Smart Structures and Materials 2003. Electroactive Polymer Actuators and Devices, San Diego, CA, USA, Mar. 2003, vol. 5051, 2003, pp. 281-290, XP002291729, Proceedings of the SPIE, ISSN: 0277-786X, the whole document.
Pei, Q. et al., “Multifunctional Electroelastomer Rolls,” Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc., vol. 698, Nov. 26-30, 2001, Boston, MA, pp. 165-170.
Pei, Q., Pelrine, R., Kornbluh, R., Jonasdottir, S., Shastri, V., Full, R., “Multifunctional Electroelastomers: Electroactive Polymers Combining Structural, Actuating, and Sensing Functions,” ITAD-433-PA-00-123, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, available at www.sri.com-publications, Jan. 17, 2001.
Pei, Q. et al., “Recent Progress on Electroelastomer Artificial Muscles and Their Application for Biomimetic Robots”, SPIE, Pub. Jun. 2004, 11 pages.
Pelrine, R. et al., “Applications of dielectric elastomer actuators,” (invited paper) in Smart Structures and Materials 2001: Electroactive Polymer Actuators and Devices, ed., Y. Bar Cohen, Proc. SPIE, 4329:335-349, 2001.
Pelrine, R. and Kornbluh, R., and. 1995. “Dexterous Multiarticulated Manipulator with Electrostrictive Polymer Artificial Muscle Actuator,” EMU 95-023, SRI International, Menlo Park, California, Apr. 28, 1995.
Pelrine, R., R. Kornbluh, and J. Joseph, “Electrostriction of Polymer Dielectrics with Compliant Electrodes as a Means of Actuation,” Sensors and Actuators A: Physical, vol. 64, No. 1, 1998, pp. 77-85.
Pelrine, R., R. Kornbluh, J. Joseph and S. Chiba, “Electrostriction of Polymer Films for Microactuators,” Proc. IEEE Tenth Annual International Workshop on Micro Electro Mechanical Systems, Nagoya, Japan, Jan. 26-30, 1997, pp. 238-243.
Pelrine et al., “Electrostrictive Polymer Artificial Muscle Actuators,” May 1998, Proc. of the 1998 IEEE Conf. on Robotics & Automation, pp. 2147-2154.
Pelrine, R., R. Kornbluh, and J. Joseph, FY 1992 Final Report on Artifical Muscle for Small Robots, ITAD-3393-FR-93-063, SRI International, Menlo Park, California, Mar. 1993.
Pelrine, R., R. Kornbluh, and J. Joseph, FY 1993 Final Report on Artifical Muscle for Small Robots, ITAD-4570-FR-94-076, SRI International, Menlo Park, California, 1994.
Pelrine, R., R. Kornbluh, and J. Joseph, FY 1994 Final Report on Artifical Muscle for Small Robots, ITAD-5782-FR-95-050, SRI International, Menlo Park, California, 1995.
Pelrine, R., R. Kornbluh, and J. Joseph, FY 1995 Final Report on Artifical Muscle for Small Robots, ITAD-7071-FR-96-047, SRI International, Menlo Park, California, 1996.
Pelrine, R., R. Kornbluh, and J. Joseph, FY 1996 Final Report on Artifical Muscle for Small Robots, ITAD-7228-FR-97-058, SRI International, Menlo Park, California, 1997.
Pelrine, R., R. Kornbluh, and J. Joseph, FY 1997 Final Report on Artifical Muscle for Small Robots, ITAD-1612-FR-98-041, SRI International, Menlo Park, California, 1998.
Pelrine, R., R. Kornbluh, and J. Joseph, FY 1998 Final Report on Artifical Muscle for Small Robots, ITAD-3482-FR-99-36, SRI International, Menlo Park, California, 1999.
Pelrine, R., R. Kornbluh, and J. Joseph, FY 1999 Final Report on Artifical Muscle for Small Robots, ITAD-10162-FR-00-27, SRI International, Menlo Park, California, 2000.
Pelrine, R., R. Kornbluh, Q. Pei, and J. Joseph, “High Speed Electrically Actuated Elastomers with Over 100% Strain,” Science, vol. 287, No. 5454, pp. 1-21, 2000.
Pelrine, R., R. Kornbluh, Q. Pei, and J. Joseph. “High Speed Electrically Actuated Elastomers with Strain Greater Than 100%”, Science, Reprint Series, Feb. 4, 2000, vol. 287, pp. 836-839.
Pelrine, R., R. Kornbluh, and G. Kofod, “High Strain Actuator Materials Based on Dielectric Elastomers,” submitted to Advanced Materials (May 2000).
Pelrine, R., Roy Kornbluh, Jose Joseph, Qibing Pei, Seiki Chiba “Recent Progress in Artificial Muscle Micro Actuators,” SRI Interational, Tokyo, 1999 MITI/NEEDOIMNIC, 1999.
Pelrine, R., R. Kornbluh, J. Joseph and S. Chiba, “Review of Artificial Muscle Approaches,” invited paper, in Proc. Third International Symposium on Micro Machine and Human Science, Nagoya, Japan, Oct. 14-16, 1992.
Piezoflex(TM) PVDF Polymer Sensors, http://www.airmar.com/piezo/pvdf.htm. Jun. 6, 2001.
PowerLab ADInstruments, MLT001 High-Sensitivity Force Transducers, AD Instruments Transducers Series, printed from web Jul. 25, 2001.
Prahlad, H. et al., “Programmable Surface Deformation: Thickness-Mode Electroactive Polymer Actuators and their Applications,” Proc. SPIE, vol. 5759, 102, 2005, 12 pages.
Puers et al, “A Capacitive Pressure Sensor with Low Impedance Output and Active Suppression of Parasitic Effects,” Sensors and Actuators, A21-A23 (1990) 108-114.
Puers, Robert, “Capacitive sensors: when and how to use them,” Sensors and Actuators A, 37-38 (1993) 93-105.
Reed, C. et al., “The Fundamentals of Aging HV Polymer-Film Capacitors,” IEEE Transactions on Dielectrics and Electrical Insulation, 1(5): 904-922, 1994.
Sakarya, S., “Micromachining Techniques for Fabrication of Integrated Light Modulting Devices”, Netherlands 2003, pp. 1-133.
Scheinbeim, J., B. Newman, Z. Ma, and J. Lee, “Electrostrictive Response of Elastomeric Polymers,” ACS Polymer Preprints, 33(2), pp. 385-386, 1992.
Schlaberg, H. I., and J. S. Duffy, “Piezoelectric Polymer Composite Arrays for Ultrasonic Medical Imaging Applications,” Sensors and Actuators, A 44, pp. 111-117, Feb. 22, 1994.
Seoul et al., “Electrospinning of Poly(vinylidene fluoride) Dimethylformamide Solutions with Carbon Nanotubes,” Department of Textile Engineering, Inha University, Mar. 31, 2003.
Shahinpoor, M., “Micro-electro-mechanics of Ionic Polymer Gels as Electrically Controllable Artificial Muscles,” J. Intelligent Material Systems and Structures, vol. 6, pp. 307-314, May 1995.
Shkel, Y. and D. Klingenberg, “Material Parameters for Electrostriction,” J. Applied Physics, vol. 80(8), pp. 4566-4572, Oct. 15, 1996.
Smela, E., O. Inganas, and I. Lundstrom, “Controlled Folding of Micrometer-size Structures,” Science, vol. 268, pp. 1735-1738 (Jun. 23, 1995).
Smela, E., O. Inganas, Q. Pei and I. Lundstrom, “Electrochemical Muscles: Micromachinging Fingers and Corkscrews,” Advanced Materials, vol. 5, No. 9, pp. 630-632, Sep. 1993.
Smith, S. et al., A low switching voltage organic-on-inorganic heterojunction memory element utilizing a conductive polymer fuse on a doped silicon substrate, Applied Physics Letters, vol. 84, No. 24, May 28, 2004, pp. 5019-5021.
Sokolova, M. et al., “Influence of a Bias Voltage on the Characteristics of Surface Discharges in Dry Air,” Plasma Processes and Polymers, 2: 162-169, 2005.
Sommer-Larsen, P. and A. Ladegaard Larsen, “Materials for Dielectric Elastomer Actuators,” SPIE, vol. 5385, Mar. 1, 2004, pp. 68-77.
Standard Test Methods for Rubber Deterioration—Cracking in an Ozone Controlled Environment, ASTM International, D 1149-07.
Su, J., Q.M. Zhang, C.H. Kim, R.Y. Ting and R. Capps, “Effects of Transitional Phenomena on the Electric Field induced Strain-electrostrictive Response of a Segmented Polyurethane elastomer,” pp. 1363-1370, Jan. 20, 1997.
Su, J, Z. Ounaies, J.S. Harrison, Y. Bara-Cohen and S. Leary, “Electromechanically Active Polymer Blends for Actuation,” Proceedings of 7th SPIE Symposium on Smart Structures and Materials—Electroactive Polymers and Devices (EAPAD) Conference, Mar. 6-8, 2000, Newport Beach, CA, USA, pp. 65-72.
Suzuki et al., “Sound radiation from convex and concave domes in infinite baffle,” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 69(2), Jan. 1981.
Technology, http://www.micromuscle.com/html/technology.html, Jun. 6, 2001.
“The Rubbery Ruler”, http://www.ph.unimelb.edu.au, printed from web Jul. 25, 2001.
Tobushi, H., S. Hayashi, and S. Kojima, “Mechanical Properties of Shape Memory Polymer of Polyurethane Series,” in JSME International Journal, Series I, vol. 35, No. 3, 1992.
Todorov et al, “WWWeb Application for Ferropiezoelectric Ceramic Parameters Calculation”, Proceedings 24th International Conference on Microelectronics, vol. 1, May 2004, pp. 507-510.
Treloar, L.R.G., “Mechanics of Rubber Elasticity,” J Polymer Science, Polymer Symposium, No. 48, pp. 107-123, 1974.
Uchino, K. 1986. “Electrostrictive Actuators: Materials and Applicaions,” Ceramic Bulletin, 65(4), pp. 647-652, 1986.
Unger et al. (2000), “Monolithic Microfabricated Valves and Pumps by Multilayer Soft Lithography,” Science 288:113-116, no month.
Wade, Jr., W.L., R.J. Mannone and M. Binder, “Increased Dielectric Breakdown Strengths of Melt-Extruded Polyporphlene Films,” Polymer vol. 34, No. 5, pp. 1093-1094 (1993).
Wax, S.G. and R.R. Sands, “Electroactive Polymer Actuators and Devices,” Proceedings of the SPIE International Symposium on Smart Structures and Materials: Electro-Active Polymer Actuators and Devices, Mar. 1-2, 1999, Newport Beach, CA, USA, pp. 2-10.
Whitesides et al. (2001), “Flexible Methods for Microfluidics,” Physics Today 52(6):42-47, no month.
Winters, J., “Muscle as an Actuator for Intelligent Robots,” Robotics Research: Trans. Robotics International of SME, Scottsdale, AZ (Aug. 18-21, 1986).
Woodard, Improvements of ModalMax High-Fidelity Peizoelectric Audio Device (LAR-16321-1), NASA Tech Briefs, May 2005, p. 36.
Xia, Younan et al., “Triangular Nanoplates of Silver: Synthesis, Characterization, and Use as Sacrificial Templates for Generating Triangular Nanorings of Gold,” Adv. Mater., 2003, 15, No. 9, pp. 695-699.
Yam, P., “Plastics Get Wired,” Scientific American, vol. 273, pp. 82-87, Jul. 1995.
Yoshio, O., “Ablation Characteristics of Silicone Insulation,” Journal of Polymer Science: Part A: Polymer Chemistry, 36: 233-239, 1998.
Yuan, W. et al. “New Electrode Materials for Dielectric Elastomer Actuators,” Proc. SPIE, 6524 (6524ON), 2007.
Zhang, Q.M., V. Bharti, Z.Y. Cheng, T.B. Xu, S. Wang, T.S. Ramotowski, F. Tito, and R. Ting, “Electromechanical Behavior of Electroactive P(VDF-TrFE) Copolymers,” Proceedings of the SPIE International Symposium on Smart Structures and Materials: Electro-Active Polymer Actuators and Devices, Mar. 1-2, 1999, Newport Beach, CA, USA, pp. 134-139.
Zhang, Q., V. Bharti and X. Zhao, “Giant Electrostriction and Relaxor Ferroelectric Behavior in Electron-irradiated Poly(vinylidene fluoride-trifluoroethylene) Copolymer,” Science, vol. 280, pp. 2101-2104 (Jun. 26, 1998).
Zhang, Q.M., Z.Y. Cheng, V. Bharti, T.B. Xu, H. Xu, T. Mai and S.J. Gross, “Piezoelectric and Electrostrictive Polymeric Actuator Materials,” Proceedings of the 7th SPIE Symposium on Smart Structures and Materials: Electroactive Polymers and Devices (EAPAD) Conference, Mar. 6-8, 2000, Newport Beach, CA, USA, pp. 34-50.
Zhenyi, M., J.I. Scheinbeim, J.W. Lee, and B.A. Newman. 1994. “High Field Electrostrictive Response of Polymers,” Journal of Polymer Sciences, Part B—Polymer Physics, vol. 32, pp. 2721-2731, 1994.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/440,991, filed May 6, 2015.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/437,741, filed Apr. 22, 2015.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/771,371, filed Aug. 28, 2015.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/649,743, filed Jun. 4, 2015.
Polyoxymethylene urea NPL document, retrieved Nov. 11, 2015.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20150096666 A1 Apr 2015 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
61660887 Jun 2012 US