The present invention relates to a striking unit for a method for material processing by the use of high kinetic energy, comprising a piston for the transfer of high kinetic energy to a blank/tool to be processed, a drive chamber connected to a system pressure arranged to drive said piston, a valve arrangement arranged to control the flow to said drive chamber, and a control system for the regulation of said valve arrangement, wherein said control system, directly or indirectly, is connected to a sensor, by which said valve arrangement is controlled in connection to a first stroke by said piston, so that the force on the piston is reduced or disconnected, whereby an additional, subsequent stroke with an essential content of kinetic energy is prevented, as well as a method where a step is taken in connection to said performed strokes, which step prevents said piston from making a rebound with an essential content of kinetic energy in order to avoid negative effects because of a rebound.
At high-speed processing, high kinetic energy is used to form and/or process a material body. In connection with high-speed processing, striking machines are used where the press piston has essentially higher kinetic energy than at conventional processing. The press piston often has a speed, which is about 100 times higher or more than in conventional presses in order to perform cross-cutting and punching, forming of metal components, powder compacting- and similar operations. In high-speed processing there is a number of different principles to achieve the high kinetic energies necessary for the achievement of the advantages which the technique offers. A great number of different machines and methods accelerating a striking body has been developed, e.g. as shown in WO 9700751. Common for all these machines, whether they for the acceleration use air, oil, springs, air-fuel mixtures, blasting agents or electro-mechanics, has been that one has in principle triggered an uncontrolled process which results in the striking body accelerating towards a tool, and that one has thereafter in some way moved the striking body back after a certain time. Further, the accelerating forces have continued to effect the striking body after the first stroke, which has resulted in that several strokes have occurred after the first stroke. These additional strokes, re-strokes, are undesirable and often directly detrimental. Also in the case when a forming tool is used, e.g. at the forming of patterned plates, it is of vital importance that the forming tool does not come into contact with the blank two times or more as there then is a risk that the tolerances of the plates is not met.
Thus, it has been identified that principally without exceptions it is a drawback to subject the work-piece to be processed in a high speed process to more than one stroke. This applies whether it is the question of cross-cutting, homogeneous forming or powder compacting. When it the question of cross-cutting, the additional unnecessary strokes may result in excessive tool wear and undesired burrs. At punching, smearing, welding, burrs and tool wear may occur. At homogeneous forming, there is the risk that undesired material changes occur, punches may crack, and the blank may be clamped unnecessarily hard in the matrix, which results in the forming force increasing with matrix wear as a consequence. At powder compacting with brittle materials such as ceramics, hard metals and the like, a second stroke may wreck the continuous body which one has managed to create in the first stroke. At powder compacting of soft powders such as copper and iron, for instance, the density will indeed continue to increase, if one strikes several times, but the blank is clamped even harder in the matrix with an increased number of strokes, which results in undesirable wear. A feasible reason for the fact that focus has not previously been put on this problem might be that these progresses are very rapid and may in many cases not been able to be observed, and therefore the detrimental effects of the re-stroke have seemed to be unexplainable. Further, the enormously short reply terms, which are required to make it possible to interrupt the acceleration of the striking body after the first stroke, imply a complication as such. If one accelerates a striking body by means of some gas, it has in principle been technically impossible to reduce the pressure in the drive chamber during the short time between the first and the second stroke (typically between two and fifty milliseconds). By means of hydraulics, it is technically possible, but most of the valves on the market have too long an adjustment time to be able to be used at the short adjustment times which may be required, often an adjustment within twenty milliseconds. As to spring machines, it is rather evident that it is somewhat difficult to form a mechanical device slacking on the spring bias within a few milliseconds. As indicated above, most known hydraulic high speed machines are equipped with valve mechanisms which cannot be adjusted quick enough to hinder the advancing oil and hence the creation of pressure in the drive chamber of the piston. The reason for this is that hydraulic valves for high flows (300 to 1000 litres/minute) normally require comparatively long adjustment times. This depends in its turn on the fact that the valve body quite simply has to move a comparatively long distance so that an enough large opening area will be created so that the oil will be able to pass through it without too large a pressure fall.
An object of the present invention is to eliminate, or at least minimize, the problems mentioned above, which is achieved with a method and a striking unit.
Thanks to the invention, a method and a device are provided, which at high speed processing may be used in a manner resulting in a higher quality than what has been known previously.
According to an aspect of the invention, it is a great advantage to be able to change the flow, and hence the pressure in the drive chamber, as quickly as possible, to be able to adjust the piston to its start position for the next stroke. The best solution is obtained with short paths and a high flow. Optimized dimensioning of cistern conduit systems and cistern accumulators provides a quick and effective pressure reduction and return of the piston, i.e. the piston may be “caught” without obtaining any double-stroke/double-bound.
According to another aspect of the invention, one on-off valve or more is used, preferably functioning according to the principle for cartridge valves to control the striking progress, which may offer the advantage that it gives a low cost as compared with other alternatives and also the advantage that it permits a quick adjustment time at large flows.
According to still an aspect of the invention, one return valve or more, which offers the advantages that the drive chamber is emptied quicker and relieves the other valves.
According to an additional aspect of the invention, at least one accumulator is used, preferably a so called high-flow accumulator, which is arranged at the non-return valve/s, connected to a cistern which provides advantages of reduced pressure peaks in the system and a quicker emptying of the drive chamber.
According to still an aspect of the invention, a pilot pressure, which is suitably higher than the system pressure, is connected to the pilot valve, which results in a quicker closing of the on-off/cartridge valve, which implies a quicker emptying of the drive chamber and which also guarantees that the on-off/cartridge valve is kept closed except at strokes.
According to an aspect of the invention, a step is taken in connection with the forming of patterned plates, which step prevents the forming tool from contacting the blank to be formed more than once.
According to another aspect of the invention, the step comprises that a well-defined holding force presses the upper tool element towards the blank to be formed, before the stroke takes place, with such a force that the upper tool element is not allowed to bounce upwards after a stroke, which prevents detrimental rebounds on the blank.
According to still an aspect of the invention, the step comprises that air is blown in between the upper tool element and the blank after a stroke, which air forms an air bag resulting in that the upper tool element does not reach the blank at a rebound and hence prevents damages on the blank.
According to an additional aspect of the invention, the step comprises that damping/resilient elements are arranged in connection to the upper tool element and that the elements exert a resilient force upwards towards the upper tool element, which is large enough to prevent the upper tool element from reaching the blank at a rebound.
Below, the invention will be described more in detail with reference to the enclosed drawings, of which:
The three bearings 20, 21, 22 mentioned above have preferably mutually different diameters, which implies that the effective areas of the piston 2 in the drive chamber 11 and the second chamber 10, respectively, differ. The effective area Akolvö of the piston 2 in the drive chamber, which the oil influences, is larger than the effective area Akolvu in the second chamber 10. In the second chamber 10 there is preferably always a system pressure pS. The pressure pA of the drive chamber 11 may be considerably lower than the system pressure pS to keep the piston 2 in balance. The following relation is valid to keep the piston 2 in balance, where mkolv is the mass of the piston 2 and g is the acceleration due to gravity:
pA×Akolvö+mkolv×g=pS×Akolvu
In order to be able to operate the cartridge valve 5 safely and rapidly, a pilot pressure pP is preferably used, which is larger than the system pressure pS.
The work cycle of the striking unit S may be divided into four parts: Positioning, Acceleration, Hit and Return Motion To symbolize the pressures which exist in different conduits in
In
In
pS×Akolvö+mkolv×g>pS×Akolvu
which implies that the piston 2 quickly accelerates downwardly, often with a resultant speed of well above 10 m/s, rather often above 12 m/s. The cartridge valve 5 thus connects the system pressure pS with the first conduit L1, so that the drive chamber 11 is pressurized, and connects then also the flow path between the chambers, via L1 and L2, so that oil which has been displaced from the lower chamber 10 may flow to the drive chamber 11. Thanks to the fact that the cartridge valve 5 is connected to the pressure accumulator 5′ a quick pressure increase in the drive chamber 11 is reached.
The non-return valve 91 is closed and put in the center position during acceleration.
It is very advantageous as quickly as possible to empty the drive chamber 11 to be able to adjust the piston 2 to the start position for the next stroke. Thanks to the design described above, a solution with short paths and a high flow, an optimal dimensioning of the cistern conduit system and cistern accumulators is obtained, which results in a quick and effective pressure reduction and a return of the piston 2, i.e. the piston 2 may be “caught” without obtaining double strokes/double bounds. A cistern accumulator of the “high flow” type (usually equipped with a disk valve) is preferred, in order to be able to handle large/quick flows, preferably min 900 l/min, more preferred min 1,000 l/m. Suitably the accumulator (or more) is adapted so that the risk is avoided that it reaches/they reach the bottom, i.e. the dimensioning should be such that a certain auxiliary volume remains also at a maximal demand.
The adjustment of the piston position before a stroke is performed by means of a servo function in accordance with the description above. The control system 9 gives a dynamic control of the servo valve 90 and the pilot valve 7, which influences the cartridge valve 5 for a stroke by dynamically calculating the time control based on the model of the striking unit, distance-time function, the stroke length chosen, etc. Output from the calculation gives a time for how long time it takes for the piston 2 to reach an impact cap 41, and thereafter it is used as input to close the valves. The choice of parameters for the adjustment algorithm is adapted to the respective striking unit S. Preferably, it may be adaptive after the calculation of the start parameters. It is the question of extremely quick progresses, which provides a control accuracy of tenths of a millisecond.
Thus, the function of the pressure accumulators is first of all to guarantee that there is oil enough during quick progresses. Without the pressure accumulators a much larger pump would have been required to be able to meet the large flows occurring during a short time. The cistern accumulators relieve the system by making it possible for them temporarily to be filled with oil, when the drive chamber is to be emptied. It would also take much longer time before the pressure is reduced, as the oil then must be emptied to the cistern 8 through cistern conduits with the drawback that, except the long path, there is a certain resistance in the hoses.
Depending on the machine size and the striking parameters the time between the start of the acceleration (T0) and the new control of the piston 2 by the control system (T2) may be in the range of 2 to 500 ms. More preferred the time range below is dependent of the mass of the piston 2:
The mass of the piston is up to 25 kg. The preferred time range is 2 to 50 ms, more preferred below 30 ms.
The mass of the piston is 25 to 250 kg. The preferred time range is 4 to 150 ms, more preferred below 80 ms.
The mass of the piston exceeds 250 kg. The preferred time range is 8 to 300 ms, more preferred below 150 ms.
The mass of the anvil and the tool is advantageously larger than the mass of the piston 2 so that the piston 2 will bounce at a hit. It is also possible to practise the invention if the mass of the anvil and the tool is equal to or somewhat smaller than the mass of the piston 2, but the foregoing is usually preferred.
It is realized that the different embodiments of the tool solutions described with reference to
The invention is not limited to the description above but may be varied within the scope of the following claims. For instance, it is realized that the number of valves and accumulators as well as their size in the examples described may vary, the number and the size is dependent on the size of the machine. In the description, a cartridge valve is described as an example, but it is realized that also other quick valves may be used. The man skilled in the art realizes that the invention idea also comprises another material processing than the one described above, e.g. punching, cross-cutting, stamping, and compacting of powders, and that the striking unit may be inverted so that the piston strikes upwards instead of downwards, as described. It is also possible that a striking unit and an anvil is placed on resilient feet, so that the anvil may move. In this way, the anvil may get a counter-directed motion towards the acceleration of the piston. Although a cartridge valve without any spring is shown in the figures, the man skilled in the art realizes that the invention idea comprises cartridge valves both with and without springs.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1450335 | Mar 2014 | SE | national |
This application is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/127,683, filed Sep. 20, 2016, which claims priority to PCT/SE2015/050251, filed Mar. 6, 2015, which claims priority to Swedish Patent Application No. 1450335-3, filed Mar. 24, 2014, all of which are incorporated by reference in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4718263 | Crout | Jan 1988 | A |
5611259 | Nagata | Mar 1997 | A |
5832807 | Rausch et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
6202757 | Dahlberg | Mar 2001 | B1 |
7104190 | Dahlberg | Sep 2006 | B2 |
20040134254 | Dahlberg | Jul 2004 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
37 11 384 | Mar 1988 | DE |
195 39 341 | May 1996 | DE |
H08 206899 | Aug 1996 | JP |
9700751 | Jan 1997 | WO |
02090015 | Nov 2002 | WO |
Entry |
---|
European Communication under Rule 71(3) EPC, dated Mar. 13, 2018, in corresponding European Application No. 15 773 112.6, 31 pages. |
Chinese Office Action (with English Translation), dated Sep. 25, 2018, issued in corresponding Chinese Application No. 201580016118.6, 4 pages. |
International Search Report issued in International Publication No. PCT/SE2015/050251 dated Jun. 10, 2015. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority issued in International Publication No. PCT/SE2015/050251 dated Jun. 10, 2015. |
European Communication dated Mar. 28, 2017 in European Application No. 15 773 112.6, 5 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20200180010 A1 | Jun 2020 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15127683 | US | |
Child | 16793958 | US |