The present disclosure relates to stringed instruments and, more specifically but not exclusively, to violins, violas, cellos, and double basses.
This section introduces aspects that may facilitate a better understanding of the disclosure. The statements of this section are to be read in this light and are not to be understood as admissions about what is prior art or what is not prior art.
A conventional violin, viola, cello, or double bass has an inherently convex top and an inherently convex back with a (typically cylindrical) soundpost held in place between the top and back. The positioning of the soundpost affects the characteristics of the sound produced by the instrument. Tension in the strings pushes down on the bridge, which in turn pushes down on the top, causing the inherent convexity of the top to decrease slightly, which in turn causes the top to apply a compressive force to the soundpost that keeps the soundpost in place. If the tension in the strings is relaxed too much, then the inherent convexity of the top may result in the soundpost falling over due to the removal of the compressive force applied to the soundpost by the top and back. As a result, a professional luthier may be needed to reset the soundpost to its proper location between the top and the back.
According to certain embodiments of the disclosure, a stringed instrument having a soundpost, such as (without limitation) a violin, viola, cello, or double bass, has an inherently flat top and an inherently flat back when the strings are not under tension, instead of the convex top and back of a conventional stringed instrument having a soundpost. When tension is applied in the strings of such a stringed instrument of the present disclosure, the force applied by the bridge causes the otherwise flat top to have a slightly concave shape, which in turn applies a compressive force onto the soundpost which causes the otherwise flat back to have a slightly convex shape.
In some embodiments, a pair of retaining rings, whose inner diameters are slightly larger than the outer diameter of the soundpost, are mounted onto the inner surfaces of the top and back of the instrument at the optimal position for the soundpost, such that the mounted retaining rings receive the opposing ends of the soundpost. The height of the retaining rings is selected such that the soundpost will stay in place between the top and back of the instrument even when no tension is applied in the strings and the top and back of the instrument have their inherent flat shapes. In this way, the conventional problem of the soundpost falling over due to insufficient string tension is avoided.
In some embodiments, the instrument can be selectively configured with any of two or more interchangeable top nuts that can be used to achieve different string heights above the fingerboard.
In some embodiments, the instrument has an adjustable neck that can be used to achieve different string heights with or without an interchangeable top nut.
In some embodiments, the bottoms of the feet of the instrument's bridge are defined by collinear lines.
In some embodiments, the instrument's bass bar is straight.
In some embodiments, the instrument's back is not symmetric about its longitudinal centerline.
Embodiments of the disclosure will become more fully apparent from the following detailed description, the appended claims, and the accompanying drawings in which like reference numerals identify similar or identical elements.
Detailed illustrative embodiments of the present disclosure are disclosed herein. However, specific structural and functional details disclosed herein are merely representative for purposes of describing example embodiments of the present disclosure. The present disclosure may be embodied in many alternate forms and should not be construed as limited to only the embodiments set forth herein. Further, the terminology used herein is for the purpose of describing particular embodiments only and is not intended to be limiting of example embodiments of the disclosure.
As used herein, the singular forms “a,” “an,” and “the,” are intended to include the plural forms as well, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise. It further will be understood that the terms “comprises,” “comprising,” “contains,” “containing,” “includes,” and/or “including,” specify the presence of stated features, steps, or components, but do not preclude the presence or addition of one or more other features, steps, or components. It also should be noted that in some alternative implementations, the functions/acts noted may occur out of the order noted in the figures. For example, two figures shown in succession may in fact be executed substantially concurrently or may sometimes be executed in the reverse order, depending upon the functions/acts involved. As used herein, the term “printed” means 3D printed using a suitable additive manufacturing technique.
For instance, in the example implementation, the top 202 and back 204 of the cello 200 are both custom made from carbon fiber sheets using computer numerical control (CNC) manufacturing at the Ningbo Haishu Lijing Plastic Equipment Factory in Ningbo, China, where the top 202 is preferably between 1 mm and 2 mm thick and the back is preferably between 0.5 mm and 2 mm thick. In alternative implementations, the top 202 and/or the back 204 may be 3D printed using polycarbonate carbon fiber-infused filament (CF). Alternatively, wood or a suitable plastic may be used for the top 202 and/or the back 204 utilizing other suitable manufacturing techniques.
Carbon fiber-infused filament may be used to increase the specific modulus of certain parts (e.g., the top 202, the back 204, the ribs 206, the heel 208, the neck 210, and the scroll 212). Additionally, the ribs 206 may be 3D printed in an efficient pattern using a single extrusion of plastic for each rib wall layer. The ribs 206 may be 3D printed as if the cello is lying down with its back against the print bed, forming the height of the ribs with each successive layer. The rib height of a traditional cello is about 12 cm. In certain implementations of the cello 200 of
As shown in
The concavity of the top of a stringed instrument of the present disclosure can be quantified in terms of the vertical displacement D between (i) a straight line drawn across the top from one edge of the instrument where the top meets the ribs to the opposing edge of the instrument where the line passes through the bridge and (ii) the point midway between the feet of the bridge with the instrument lying on its back. When no pressure is applied by the strings to the bridge and the top is flat, that vertical displacement D is zero. As pressure applied by the strings to the bridge increases such that the top becomes more concave, that vertical displacement D increases.
In some implementations of the cello 200, the vertical displacement D is greater than 1.5 mm. In some of those implementations, the vertical displacement D is greater than 2.0 mm, and, in some of those implementations, the vertical displacement D is greater than 2.5 mm.
For cello 200 having a body length L of 73.5 mm, the concavity can be represented in terms of a percentage of the body length L. Thus, in some implementations of the cello, the vertical displacement D is greater than 2.0 percent of the body length L. In some of those implementations, the vertical displacement D is greater than 2.7 percent of the body length L, and, in some of those implementations, the vertical displacement D is greater than 3.4 percent of the body length L. Note that, although the absolute vertical displacements D are expected to be different (i.e., violin, viola, cello and double bass from smallest to largest vertical displacements), the concavities of violins, violas, and double basses of the present disclosure are expected to have vertical displacements D with similar percentages of their different body lengths L.
Analogously, for cello 200 having a center bout width W of 23.25 mm, the concavity can be represented in terms of a percentage of the center bout width W. Thus, in some implementations of the cello, the vertical displacement D is greater than 6.5 percent of the center bout width W. In some of those implementations, the vertical displacement D is greater than 8.6 percent of the center bout width W, and, in some of those implementations, the vertical displacement D is greater than 10.8 percent of the center bout width W. Note that, here, too, the concavities of violins, violas, and double basses of the present disclosure are expected to have vertical displacements D with similar percentages of their different center bout widths W.
In a traditionally constructed cello, when the strings are under tension, the soundpost is kept in place only by friction between the ends of the soundpost and the inner surfaces of the top and the back resulting from the compressive force applied by the bridge to the top and by the top to the soundpost. In the cello 200 of
In certain implementations, the length of the soundpost 222 is approximately the same as the height of the ribs 206, such that the top 202 and the back 204 will retain their inherently flat shapes when no force is applied by the bridge 220. When the bridge 220 does apply force to the top 202 as a result of tension in the strings 214, the top 202 will assume its slightly concave shape, which will result in the soundpost 222 applying force to cause the back to assume its slightly convex shape.
For a soundpost 222 having a cylindrical shape, at a minimum, the inner diameters of the top and back retaining rings 224 and 226 need to be the same as or slightly larger than the diameter of the soundpost 222 to enable the rings to receive the ends of the soundpost. In some implementations, the inner diameters of the top and back retaining rings 224 and 226 are significantly larger than the diameter of the soundpost 222 such that the soundpost 222 can be positioned at a variety of different locations within the retaining rings. In these implementations, the heights of these wider retaining rings 224 and 226 are sufficiently large to prevent the soundpost 222 from falling over when no pressure is applied by the bridge 220 and the top 202 and the back 204 have their inherently flat shapes. Those skilled in the art will understand that the minimum heights of the retaining rings 224 and 226 may be determined geometrically based on the inner diameters of the retaining rings 224 and 226, the length and diameter of the soundpost 222, and the height of the ribs 206 (i.e., the distance between the inner surfaces of the top 202 and the back 204).
In a conventional cello, the bass bar has an inherently curvilinear shape that matches the curvilinear shape of the inner surface of the convex cello top on which the bass bar is mounted. In certain implementations of cello 200 of
Furthermore, because the relatively thin top 202 and back 204 are both tented as a result of the tension applied in the strings 214, the top 202 and the back 204 function as stretched membranes, which increases the resonance of the cello 200 compared to traditionally made instruments where the tops and backs are substantially rigid, inherently load-bearing structures.
In certain implementations, the cello 200 of
As shown in
As known in the art, a conventional endpin, such as endpin 108 of
The subassembly 1000 of
As shown in
The assembly of the cello 200 may then be completed as follows:
In some implementations of cello 200 of
Note that the feature of interchangeable top nuts 234 may be applied to any suitable stringed instrument, including those without a soundpost and/or those without a concave top.
As described previously, the subassemblies 1000 and 1100 of
Note that the feature of an adjustable neck may be applied to any suitable stringed instrument, including those without a soundpost and/or those without a concave top.
In alternative implementations of the cello 200 of
Although embodiments have been described in which the soundpost 222 is cylindrical and the top and back retaining rings 224 and 226 have circular openings, as long as the ends of the soundpost can be positioned within the retaining rings without falling over, the soundpost and the openings of the retaining rings can have other appropriate shapes and sizes.
Although the disclosure has been described in the context of the cello 200 of
Although embodiments have been described in which the retaining rings 224 and 226 are mounted onto the inner surfaces of the inherently flat top 202 and the inherently flat back 204 of the cello 200 of
In certain embodiments, the present disclosure is a musical instrument configured to receive strings and a bridge, the instrument comprising (i) a back separated from a top by a rib structure to define an interior of the instrument and (ii) a soundpost within the interior and spanning between an inner surface of the back and an inner surface of the top. The instrument is configured to receive the bridge positioned between the strings and an outer surface of the top to support the strings over the top. The top and back are inherently flat. When tension is applied in the strings such that the bridge applies force to the top and the soundpost applies force to the back, the top acquires a concave shape and the back acquires a convex shape.
In at least some of the above embodiments, the instrument further comprises the strings and the bridge.
In at least some of the above embodiments, the concavity of the top and the convexity of the back increase as the strings are tightened over the bridge.
In at least some of the above embodiments, the top has a top retaining ring at a location on the inner surface of the top; the back has a back retaining ring at a location on the inner surface of the back, wherein the location of the back retaining ring corresponds to the location of the top retaining ring; and a first end the soundpost is positioned within the top retaining ring and a second end of the soundpost is positioned within the back retaining ring.
In at least some of the above embodiments, the top and back retaining rings have cylindrical shapes.
In at least some of the above embodiments, when the top and back have their inherently flat shapes, the top and back retaining rings keep the soundpost in place between the inner surface of the back and the inner surface of the top.
In at least some of the above embodiments, the instrument further comprises an inherently straight bass bar mounted onto the inner surface of the top.
In at least some of the above embodiments, the bridge has feet having inherently collinear bottoms.
In at least some of the above embodiments, tension in the strings induces an inward pulling force on the rib structure where the top meets the rib structure.
In at least some of the above embodiments, the instrument further comprises a neck having a nut opening configured to receive any one of a number of different top nuts of different sizes to achieve different string heights for the instrument.
In at least some of the above embodiments, the instrument comprises (i) a first subassembly comprising the back, top, rib structure, and soundpost and (ii) a second subassembly comprising the instrument's heel, neck, scroll, tuning pegs, and fingerboard, wherein the first subassembly further comprises a screw that engages with a nut of the second subassembly to interconnect the first and second subassemblies.
In at least some of the above embodiments, the screw can be rotated to achieve different string heights in the instrument.
In at least some of the above embodiments, the instrument is a cello, and, when the cello is assembled, the top has a vertical displacement from its inherent flat shape at the location of the bridge of at least 1.5 mm.
In at least some of the above embodiments, when the cello is assembled, the vertical displacement of the top from its inherent flat shape at the location of the bridge is at least 2.0 mm.
In at least some of the above embodiments, when the cello is assembled, the vertical displacement of the top from its inherent flat shape at the location of the bridge is at least 2.5 mm.
In at least some of the above embodiments, when the instrument is assembled, the top has a vertical displacement from its inherent flat shape at the location of the bridge of at least 2.0 percent of the instrument's body length.
In at least some of the above embodiments, when the instrument is assembled, the vertical displacement of the top from its inherent flat shape at the location of the bridge is at least 2.7 percent of the instrument's body length.
In at least some of the above embodiments, when the instrument is assembled, the vertical displacement of the top from its inherent flat shape at the location of the bridge is at least 3.4 percent of the instrument's body length.
In at least some of the above embodiments, when the instrument is assembled, the top has a vertical displacement from its inherent flat shape at the location of the bridge of at least 6.5 percent of the instrument's center bout width.
In at least some of the above embodiments, when the instrument is assembled, the vertical displacement of the top from its inherent flat shape at the location of the bridge is at least 8.6 percent of the instrument's center bout width.
In at least some of the above embodiments, when the instrument is assembled, the vertical displacement of the top from its inherent flat shape at the location of the bridge is at least 10.8 percent of the instrument's center bout width.
Unless explicitly stated otherwise, each numerical value and range should be interpreted as being approximate as if the word “about” or “approximately” preceded the value or range.
It will be further understood that various changes in the details, materials, and arrangements of the parts which have been described and illustrated in order to explain embodiments of this disclosure may be made by those skilled in the art without departing from embodiments of the disclosure encompassed by the following claims.
In this specification including any claims, the term “each” may be used to refer to one or more specified characteristics of a plurality of previously recited elements or steps. When used with the open-ended term “comprising,” the recitation of the term “each” does not exclude additional, unrecited elements or steps. Thus, it will be understood that an apparatus may have additional, unrecited elements and a method may have additional, unrecited steps, where the additional, unrecited elements or steps do not have the one or more specified characteristics.
The use of figure numbers and/or figure reference labels in the claims is intended to identify one or more possible embodiments of the claimed subject matter in order to facilitate the interpretation of the claims. Such use is not to be construed as necessarily limiting the scope of those claims to the embodiments shown in the corresponding figures.
Reference herein to “one embodiment” or “an embodiment” means that a particular feature, structure, or characteristic described in connection with the embodiment can be included in at least one embodiment of the disclosure. The appearances of the phrase “in one embodiment” in various places in the specification are not necessarily all referring to the same embodiment, nor are separate or alternative embodiments necessarily mutually exclusive of other embodiments. The same applies to the term “implementation.”
The embodiments covered by the claims in this application are limited to embodiments that (1) are enabled by this specification and (2) correspond to statutory subject matter. Non-enabled embodiments and embodiments that correspond to non-statutory subject matter are explicitly disclaimed even if they fall within the scope of the claims.
Unless otherwise specified herein, the use of the ordinal adjectives “first,” “second,” “third,” etc., to refer to an object of a plurality of like objects merely indicates that different instances of such like objects are being referred to, and is not intended to imply that the like objects so referred-to have to be in a corresponding order or sequence, either temporally, spatially, in ranking, or in any other manner.
This is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 17/756,743, filed on Nov. 17, 2022, which claims the benefit of the filing date of PCT patent application no. PCT/US22/72167, filed on May 6, 2022, which claims the benefit of U.S. provisional patent application No. 63/187,970, filed on May 13, 2021, the teachings of all of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
63187970 | May 2021 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 17756743 | Jun 2022 | US |
Child | 18792839 | US |