This application is a national phase application of International Application No. PCT/EP2009/056670, filed May 29, 2009, designating the United States and claiming priority to European Patent Application No. 08157373.5, filed May 30, 2008, both of which are incorporated by reference herein in their entirety.
The present invention relates to the field of charged particle accelerators, such as a cyclotron. More particularly, the present invention relates to a stripping member, a stripping assembly as well as a method for extracting a particle beam from a cyclotron.
Cyclotrons are largely used in many applications such as medical applications (e.g. production of radioisotopes or particle therapy), scientific research and industrial applications.
A cyclotron is a re-circulation particle accelerator that works under high vacuum and accelerates ions up to energies of a few MeV, and even more. Charged particles, which have been previously generated by an ion source, are accelerated in a spiral motion within the cyclotron and are, at the end of said spiral motion, extracted from the cyclotron by means of an extraction system.
Particles acceleration within a cyclotron is achieved by using on the one hand a magnetic field, generated by an electromagnet, which causes the particles, coming from the ion source, to follow a circular path in a plane perpendicular to said magnetic field, and on the other hand by means of an electric field generated by a RF system (comprising a high frequency power supply) capable of applying a high-frequency alternating voltage which increasingly accelerates particles.
As a result, particles follow a spiral path by gaining energy (increase of energy implies an increase of particles orbit radius) until the outer radius of the cyclotron where they can either be extracted out of the cyclotron, or, in specific applications, used inside the cyclotron itself, for example for producing isotopes. However, in most of applications it is required to extract the ion beam out of the cyclotron, and guide it to a target where it can be used. In this case an extraction system is typically installed near the internal outer radius of the cyclotron.
For extracting positively charged particles the common extraction method is achieved by means of an electrostatic deflector which produces a strong electric field capable of deflecting accelerated particles from its acceleration orbit into an extraction orbit. This electrostatic deflector typically consists of a very thin electrode called septum which is placed between the last internal orbit of the cyclotron and the extraction orbit through which particles will be extracted. However, this extraction method has two main drawbacks, as follows. The first drawback is that the extraction efficiency of such a method is quite limited, thereby limiting the maximum beam intensity that can be extracted due to thermal heating of the septum by the intercepted beam. The second drawback is that interception of particles by the septum contributes strongly to the radio-activation of the cyclotron.
Another extraction method is known from EP0853867 (by the Applicant), wherein the ion beam can be extracted from the cyclotron without the use of any extraction system. However, the main drawback of this technique consists in that said method is complex.
Another common extraction method is the stripping extraction method which uses a carbon stripping foil in order to extract a negative ion beam coming from a negative ion source which is converted into a positive ion beam by stripping one or more of the electrons of the negative ion. The extraction efficiency of such a method can be as high as 99% and is much simpler than the previous ones and depends on the material thickness. The bigger thickness of a stripping material the more the ion beam is enlarged. As a consequence, the dispersion of the beam exiting the cyclotron increases when the thickness of the stripping foil increases.
Typically, carbon stripping foils are mounted on stripping probes or forks and are inserted inside the vacuum chamber of the cyclotron by means of a stripper arm in the outer region of the cyclotron (this insertion is well known in the art). Stripping foils are usually made up of carbon and have a size of the order of 2×2 cm. The high intensity negative ion beam (such as H− or D−) is accelerated inside the accelerator along a spiral path and then it is scattered by such a stripping foil. During the hit between said negative ion beam and the surface of said stripper foil, two electrons of the negative ion beam are stripped away by the stripping foil, due to the Coulomb force between the atomic nucleus of the substance of said stripping foil and the negative ion beam. As a result, desired charged particles are obtained, such as protons for example, while the two stripped electrons are used to measure the current of the negative ion beam by means of grounded acquisition electronics.
Since in a cyclotron this interaction takes place in the magnetic field which provides the rotational component of the accelerating orbit, the change of the specific charge of the ion results in the change of direction of the ion orbit after the stripper foil. This particular effect is typically used for extracting an ion beam from a cyclotron, as represented in
In many applications, the energy of the ion beam generated by a cyclotron may not be fixed. In fact, the production of several ion beams with different energy (i.e. with different radius orbits) is typically required and, in this case, each of the desired ion beams has a corresponding foil position within the extraction region in order to extract the ion beam out of the cyclotron.
However, conventional stripping foils are very fragile due to extraction efficiency requirements and, consequently, are not capable of maintaining their physical properties during repeated ion hits. Such repeated hits typically cause in fact excessive heating and, consequently, damages of stripper foils. Moreover, when the vacuum condition of the accelerator is lost (during standard maintenance procedures or during the event of a sudden accidental vacuum loss, for example) the stripper foil typically cracks due to pressure variations. As a consequence, the lifetime of conventional stripper foils is very short, and typical lifetime ranges are from a few hours to a few days, depending on the beam current intensity and density.
As already mentioned, the choice of stripper foil thickness and, consequently, the stripper foil lifetime depend on the energy of the ion beam and also on the type of ion beam to be extracted. It is well known in the art that stripping foils having thickness between 2 μm and 5 μm have very high extraction efficiency but a very low durability (due to mechanical stress and/or heating due to repeated ion hits). By contrast, stripping foils with thickness between 16 μm and 50 μm have a very high durability but at the same time lower extraction efficiency which may be between for example between 50% and 65%.
The extraction efficiency depends therefore on the thickness of the stripping foil as follows. When the negative ion beam passes through the stripper foil, there are beam losses due to mechanism of multiple scattering. Multiple scattering consists in the increase of the beam emittance, i.e. the dispersal of the particle beam into a range of directions, when the beam passes through the stripper foil as a result of collisions between the particle beam and the stripper foil. The higher the thickness of the stripper foil, the more multiple scattering increases. Since the exit of the cyclotron has a very small diameter, if the emittance of the stripped particle beam is higher, a larger fraction of the particle beam may be lost because unable to pass through the exit of the cyclotron.
As mentioned before, conventional stripping foils are fragile and due to wear need to be replaced regularly. Replacing a stripper foil is cumbersome and takes time: the vacuum inside the cyclotron is broken, the cyclotron is opened, human doses in maintenance must be taken, the stripper foil is replaced, the cyclotron is closed, and the cyclotron is pumped down until good vacuum is obtained. To overcome this problem, Heikkinen et al. (Cyclotron development program at Jyvaskyla, Cylotron and their applications 2001, Sixteenth International Conference) have installed a stripper mechanism with a rotating foil holder having four stripper foils, in a vacuum tank of a 30 MeV cyclotron. In case a stripper foil is damaged, the stripper mechanism is rotated in order to position a new stripper foil in front of the beam. However, this mechanism is too cumbersome for smaller cyclotrons like 18 MeV cyclotrons. Moreover, in case of failure of a stripping foil, if the beam is not stopped, it hits and damages the vacuum chamber or other structures inside of the cyclotron. To avoid this, a probe is located inside the cyclotron to detect a failure and provide the information to stop the beam. Then the wheel is rotated to position a new stripping foil in the trajectory of the beam and the beam acceleration is restarted. In addition, the implementing of a probe for detecting a failure complicates the device and causes an additional bulk inside the cyclotron. Such a probe in combination with such a rotating foil holder is not implementable in the reduced volume available inside a smaller cyclotron. Another drawback of this solution brought by these authors is that even if the cyclotron is not opened, in the case of production of short half-life radioisotopes, it is important to minimize the time of replacing of the stripper foil and to avoid the stopping of the beam.
It is an object of the present invention to provide a new kind of stripping assembly and stripping member, as well as a method which overcome the drawbacks of the prior art.
It is another object of the present invention to provide a stripping assembly and a stripping member, as well as a method which provide high extraction efficiency and high durability with respect to conventional stripper foils during repeated ion hits and even when vacuum condition of the cyclotron is lost.
It is still another object of the present invention to provide a stripping assembly and a stripping member, as well as a method which on the one hand improves the throughput of the cyclotron and on the other hand minimizes maintenance procedures time.
The invention is related to a stripping member and methods as described in the appended claims. Specific embodiments are described in combinations of the independent claims with one or more of the dependent claims. According to a first aspect of the present invention, a stripping member for stripping electrons off a negatively charged particle beam at the periphery of a cyclotron, and for extracting a particle beam out of said cyclotron is provided. Said stripping member comprises a first stripper foil adapted for being located at the periphery of said cyclotron so that said particle beam passes through said first stripper foil and it further comprises a second stripper foil adapted for being located at the periphery of said cyclotron at a more peripheral radius than said first stripper foil and arranged in a common plane and in a side-by-side relationship with the first stripper foil, so that when said first stripper foil is damaged, said negatively charged particle beam passes through said second stripper foil. The stripper foils are arranged in such a way that the changeover from the first to the second foil in case of damage to the first foil takes place without the need to stop the beam and without the need to move the stripping member.
Advantageously, the thickness of said second stripper foil is higher than the thickness of said first stripper foil.
Preferably, said first stripper foil and said second stripper foil are both made of pyrolytic carbon.
More advantageously, said first stripper foil has a grammage comprised between 2 μg/cm2 and 10 μg/cm2 and said second stripper foil has a grammage comprised between 12 μg/cm2 and 35 μg/cm2.
According to a second aspect of the present invention, a stripping assembly for stripping electrons off a negatively charged particle beam at the periphery of a cyclotron for extracting a particle beam out of said cyclotron is provided. Said stripping assembly comprises the stripping member according to the first aspect of the invention as well as support means adapted to maintain said stripping member at the periphery of said cyclotron.
Advantageously, the stripping assembly further comprises adjusting means capable of adjusting the position of said stripping member within the cyclotron whereby increasing the extraction efficiency of said stripping member when said negatively charged particle beam is being stripped by said second stripper foil.
Preferably, according to said second aspect, said support means is adapted to support a second stripping member of the same type having a third stripper foil and a fourth stripper foil.
More preferably, said stripping assembly further comprises driving means adapted to move said support means from a first position wherein said negatively charged particle beam is stripped either by first stripper foil or second first foil of stripping member, to a subsequent second position wherein said negatively charged particle beam is stripped either by said third stripper foil or said fourth stripper foil of said second stripper member. According to an embodiment, said support means is a rotatable stripper head, rotatable around a vertical axis, perpendicular to the particle beam path.
According to a third aspect of the present invention, a method for stripping electrons off a negatively charged particle beam at the periphery of a cyclotron for extracting a particle beam out of said cyclotron is provided. This method comprises the following steps:
Preferably, said step of extracting said charged particle beam by means of the second stripping foil further comprises the step of:
More preferably, said method comprises the steps of:
According to a first aspect of the present invention, as schematically represented in
Said first stripper foil 10 is located at the distal region of the stripper member 2 while the second stripper foil 20 is located at the proximal region of the stripper member 2, in such a manner that when the stripper member 2 is inserted inside the cyclotron, first stripper foil 10 and second stripper foil 20 are respectively located in a more inwards position and in a more outwards position within the internal region of the cyclotron (the terms distal/proximal and inwards/outwards being with respect to the cyclotron's central axis). As a consequence, the negative ion beam 1000, during its spiral path, will reach at first the first stripper foil 10, as described below.
In other embodiments of the present invention, the two stripper foils 10, 20 may be supported by different forks and located at different radii in the cyclotron, whilst still being positioned side-by-side in a common plane. For example, two forks as shown in
Stripping foils 10, 20 are both made up of a pyrolytic carbon material which is a carbon material similar to graphite which is typically obtained by depositing gaseous hydrocarbon compounds on suitable underlying substrates (carbon materials, metals, ceramics) at temperatures ranging from 1000 to 2500 K (chemical vapour deposition). Pyrolytic carbon has a better durability and resistance with respect to conventional carbon used for manufacturing stripper foils.
According to an embodiment of the present invention, stripper foils 10, 20 have different thickness. A foil may be characterized by its thickness, expressed in μm or characterized by its grammage, like in paper industry, that is the mass per area of foil expressed here in μg/cm2. The thickness of the foil in μm is obtained by dividing the grammage by the density of the foil material. For example, first stripper foil 10 has a thickness of 5 μm and presents, as noticed by the Applicant, an extraction efficiency of about 90%, while second stripper foil 20 has a thickness of 25 μm and presents an extraction efficiency of about 75%. As a consequence, second stripper foil 20 is more resistant to damages with respect to first stripper foil 10 but has lower extraction efficiency.
According to the invention, the second stripper foil 20 is used only when the first stripper foil 10 is damaged and acts, therefore, as a backup stripper foil. When in use, the stripper member 2 is positioned in a nominal position which is slightly inwards the outer internal region of the cyclotron (not shown), as well known in the art. After the high intensity negative ion beam 1000 has traveled its spiral path by gaining energy, it intercepts the first stripping foil 10 of the stripper member 2 and it is finally extracted by said first stripper foil 10. When said first stripper foil 10 should be damaged (caused for example by repeated hits, standard machine openings, or vacuum loss or heating, as previously described) as shown in
According to a second aspect of the present invention, a stripper assembly 1, as schematically shown in
Adjusting means (not shown) for adjusting the position of the stripping assembly 1 and therefore the position of said second stripper foil 20 with respect to the incoming negative ion beam 1000 within the cyclotron may be further provided in order to decrease the dispersion of the stripped particle beam over the exit of the cyclotron and therefore increase the extraction efficiency of the second stripper foil 20. The adjusted position may be any position, linear or angular, e.g. linear along a radial direction with respect to the central axis, or angular around said central axis or around a horizontal axis.
According to a second embodiment of the second aspect of the present invention, said stripping assembly 1 comprises, instead of the stripping arm 40, a stripper head 41 capable of supporting an additional second stripping member 3, the latter comprising a third stripper foil 11 and a fourth stripper foil 21, maintained by means of a second fork 31, as represented by
Third stripper foil 11 and fourth stripper foil 21 of second stripping member 3 have the same characteristics as first stripper foil 10 and second stripper foil 20 of stripping member 2 respectively. According to this second embodiment, it is possible to rotate the stripping assembly 1 so as to intercept the negative ion beam 1000 either with stripping foils 10, of stripping member 2 or with stripping foils 11, 21 of second stripping member 3. As shown in
According to a third aspect of the present invention, a method for stripping said negative ion beam 1000 coming from a charged particle accelerator is provided. By following the steps of such a method it is possible to easily and quickly replace a damaged stripper foil with a second one without stopping and opening the cyclotron. In fact, when the first stripper foil 10 has been damaged, as already described, the negative ion beam 1000 is no more extracted and keeps turning until it reaches the second stripper foil 20 of said stripper member 2. The second stripper foil 20 consequently acts as a backup foil.
According to a variant of said third aspect of the present invention, it is also possible to rotate the stripping assembly 1 of
One or more embodiments of the present invention have been described in detail with reference to the attached figures. It is evident that the invention is only limited by the claims, since the figures described are only schematic and therefore non-limiting. In the figures, the size of some of the elements may be exaggerated and not drawn on scale for illustrative purposes. The dimensions and the relative dimensions do not necessarily correspond to actual reductions to practice of the invention. Further, those skilled in the art can recognize numerous variations and modifications of this invention that are encompassed by its scope. Accordingly, the description of preferred embodiments should not be deemed to limit the scope of the present invention.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
08157373 | May 2008 | EP | regional |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2009/056670 | 5/29/2009 | WO | 00 | 5/13/2010 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2009/144316 | 12/3/2009 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3641446 | Gordon | Feb 1972 | A |
3866132 | Gorka, Jr. | Feb 1975 | A |
3896392 | Hudson et al. | Jul 1975 | A |
6057655 | Jongen | May 2000 | A |
6462348 | Gelbart | Oct 2002 | B1 |
7223463 | Arakida | May 2007 | B2 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
9714279 | Apr 1997 | WO |
Entry |
---|
M. Abs et al., “A New Design of Truly Selfshielding Baby-Cyclotrons for Positron Emitter Production.” Proceedings of the 1989 IEEE Particle Accelerator Conference. Accelerator Science and Technology (Cat. No. 89CH2669-0) IEEE New York, NY, USA, 1989, vol. 1, pp. 675-677. |
E. Conard et al., “Current Status and Future of Cyclotron Development at IBA” Proceedings of 2nd European Particle Accelerator Conference, Jun. 1990, pp. 419-421. |
K. Jimbo et al., “Volume Production of Negative Hydrogen and Deuterium Ions in a Reflex-Type Ion Source.” Nuclear Instruments & Methods in Physics Research, Section A (Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment) Netherlands, vol. A248, No. 2-3, Aug. 1, 1986, pp. 282-286. |
G. Ciavola et al., “Operational Experience With the 450 kV Injector for the Superconducting Cyclotron,” Nuclear Instruments & Methods in Physics Research, Section A (Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment) Netherlands, vol. 382, No. 1-2, Nov. 11, 1996, pp. 192-196. |
V.P. Dmitrievsky et al., “Experimental Study of Simultaneous Acceleration of Protons and H-Ions in the Cyclotron.” Proceedings of the 1st European Particle Accelerator Conference, Jun. 1988, pp. 616-618. |
International Application No. PCT/EP2009/056670, Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration, date of mailing Sep. 3, 2009, 12 pages. |
International Application No. PCT/EP2009/056673, Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration, date of mailing Sep. 3, 2009, 12 pages (related application). |
P. Heikkinen et al., “Cyclotron Development Program At Jyvaskyla.” AIP Conference Proceedings AIP USA, No. 600, 2001, pp. 89-93. |
L. Calabretta et al., “High Intensity Proton Beams From Cyclotrons for H2<+>.” Proceedings of the 1999 Particle Accelerator Conference (Cat. No. 99CH36366), IEEE Piscataway, NJ, vol. 5, 1999, pp. 3288-3290. |
H. Ryuto et al., “Charge Strippers for Acceleration of Uranium Beam At Riken Ri-Beam Factory.” 18th International Conference on Cyclotrons and Their Applications, 2007, Giardini naxos, Italy, p. 314. |
R. Richardson. “Meson Factories.” IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science USA, vol. NS-12, No. 3, Jun. 1965, pp. 1012-1026. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110089335 A1 | Apr 2011 | US |