This application is a 371 U.S. National Stage filing of International application No. PCT/BR2019/050035, filed Feb. 7, 2019, published as WO2019/153063A1, and claims benefit/priority of Brazilian priority application No. 202018002676-9, filed Feb. 8, 2018, published as BR202018002676-9-U2 and -Y1, all of which are incorporated herein by reference in entirety by reference and by attachment.
The present utility model refers to a structural arrangement for attaching uppers on flexible soles of sandals, more specifically to a mechanism for the double fitting of uppers on flexible soles of sandals (flip-flop sandals).
Flip-flop sandals have a conventional construction consisting of an upper containing a central cylindrical longitudinal strap that attaches to the sole between the first toe (hallux) and the second toe, while two other cylindrical longitudinal straps extend laterally from the central strap, surrounding the user's feet, and attaching to both sides of the sandal. Some models may show differentiation in the places where the upper straps are attached, but the wrapping structure of the user's feet remains fundamentally the same.
This construction allows the sandal to remain attached to the user's feet when moving, such as walking, maintaining an upper traction force between the user's instep and the sole of the sandal. Thus, the greatest friction and wear caused by movement are concentrated on the user's instep—causing the manufacture of uppers in rubberized and flexible materials in order to reduce friction and irritation with human skin—and in the three fitting points of the upper to the sole of the sandal, namely between the hallux and the second toe and on both sides of the feet.
The problem with this concept is that its construction is fragile when the user's movement is intense. In the face of a run, for example, the traction shown at the three points of attachment to the sole is too high, causing the disengagement of the upper from the sole—a situation in which the user needs to stop and re-fit it, forcing the entry and making the structure as a whole even more fragile—or permanently damaging the structure—either due to the damage to the sole that tears and can no longer properly attach the upper or due to the upper partition, which no longer has one or more of the three attachment structures to the sole of the sandal.
Faced with this problem, some solutions have been proposed and can be seen in the prior art. Document PI 1000911-6 describes a device for attaching an upper to the sole of a shoe such as a flip-flop sandal, wherein the upper has a plastic hitch projection with a conically shaped end and a cylindrical shaft with a diameter smaller than the base of the cone. This construct allows easy insertion of the upper to the sole while making it difficult to remove it. However, a conical projection of the fitting ends does not offer greater resistance to traction promoted by intense movements and such construct remains fragile in such situations.
Document MU 6801346 discloses the fragility problem of the mechanism for attaching the upper to the sole of flip-flop sandals and presents one simple solution: the duplication of attachment structures of the side longitudinal strap of the upper. Thus, the upper now has five attachment structures, one between the hallux and the second toe, and two on each side of the user's foot. To increase the resistance of the upper to intense movements, however, two attachment structures of each side longitudinal strap of the upper are necessary, and they need to be wider to obtain a larger contact surface and, consequently, generate friction with the user's instep. However, the problem with this design is that, in the face of prolonged intense movements, the user feels uncomfortable due to the wider uppers and the excessive number of attachment structures.
Document PI 0604324-0 shows a fitting structure of the upper to the sole of the flip-flop sandals with threaded bushings containing an adhesive substance, in which the terminal attachment component is threaded. This construct, in addition to presenting higher production costs for the upper (due to the threaded structure, and an adhesive substance), does not provide greater resistance to the assembly. Somehow, it is possible to affirm that the problem with such a construct is the decrease of the resistance of the assembly in the long term, due to the natural wear of the integral parts during the continuous processes of changing the uppers.
Document PI 0921316-3 shows a double system for attaching the upper to the sole in a single structure, keeping one attachment region at the bottom part of the sole (in contact with the ground), and one in the upper part. Both the structures are maintained by the difference of diameter of the attachment element in relation to the hole where said element is fitted in the sole. The problem with this construct is the difficulty of keeping the fitting elements connected among them. In this way, the attachment to the user's foot is relatively weak since the instep is not properly wrapped, allowing the entire sandal to leave the user's foot in intense movements.
In light of the prior art documents presented and the problems mentioned, the present utility model presents a structural arrangement of flip-flop sandals, wherein the upper remains firmly in contact with the user's instep and has attachment structures to the sole, allowing the upper to firmly adhere to it, and providing the realization of intense movements by the user, such as race, without the detachment of the upper or leave the user's foot.
One of the objectives of the present utility model is to provide a structural arrangement for attaching upper to the soles of flip-flop sandals in order to ensure that the upper does not come loose during intense user movements.
Another objective of the present utility model is to provide an upper for flip-flop sandals that are comfortable and firmly suited to the user's instep without coming loose during intense movements.
A third objective of the present utility model is to provide an attachment mechanism of upper to the sole of flip-flop sandals that is functional and of easy production.
The present utility model allows the practical construction, and without extra costs, of flip-flop sandals that remains in firm contact with the user's instep and has attachment structures to the sole, allowing the upper to firmly adhere to it, and providing the realization of intense movements by the user, such as race, without the concern of the detachment of the upper or leave the user's feet.
The objectives of the present utility model are achieved through a structural arrangement with double fitting, wherein the upper straps (containing hollow spaces at their ends) pass through the upper surface of the flexible sole of the sandal, which contains cavities, until the bottom surface, where they find stopper that fit them. Such stoppers have pins for attaching the upper and a region of larger diameter than the cavity in the sole, securely fastening the upper.
The flexible sole of the sandal has three cavities that pass through its entire dimension, communicating the upper part (which is in contact with the user's feet) with the lower part (which is in contact with the ground).
The upper is a unique flexible structure and has three attaching ends—between the hallux and the second toe, as well as on the sides of the user's foot. Each end of the upper has small protuberances in contact with both upper and lower surfaces of the flexible sole in order to increase the grip and a hollow space in the most distal region that passes through the cavities of the flexible sole and fits tightly to the stopper.
Stoppers are rigid plastic elements that have a central pin-shaped structure and fit into the hollow spaces at ends of the upper. As the stoppers have a diameter much larger than the diameter of the hollow space, they overlap the lower protuberances and are firmly attached to the bottom of the sole.
The proposed structural arrangement, therefore, presents a first resistance to the removal of the upper by the lower and upper protuberances thereof, and a second resistance, due to the rigid plastic stopper that keeps the upper attached through the fitting to the stoppers and the bottom sole. The present construction ensures that the traction force made by intense movements of the user is supported and distributed by the assembly of parts of the fitting mechanism, causing the force that pulls the upper upwards during the movement to be counterbalanced by the downwards force of the rigid plastic stoppers.
In the following, the present utility model is described in more detail regarding the drawings.
The object of the present utility model is preferably manufactured in plastic with characteristics such as flexibility and high durability, which allow its use for a long time. However, any other materials of compatible durability and flexibility can be applied, such as vegetable fibers. Likewise, other upper shapes are included in the scope of protection of the object of this utility model, since the functionality of the upper attachment mechanism remains unaffected.
Additionally, the proposed structural arrangement should not be limited to just flip-flop sandals, since the stopper exchange is possible in other upper variations.
Referring to the above-mentioned figures and according to
Also according to
Also according to
It is possible to see (
In
Finally, it is possible to see a detailed view of the fitting mechanism in
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
202018002676-9 | Feb 2018 | BR | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/BR2019/050035 | 2/7/2019 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2019/153063 | 8/15/2019 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3553754 | Mendelsohn | Jan 1971 | A |
3890725 | Lea | Jun 1975 | A |
4864736 | Bierk | Sep 1989 | A |
7694436 | Mullen | Apr 2010 | B2 |
9072338 | Kostecky | Jul 2015 | B1 |
9078487 | Hillyer | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9380836 | Vigil | Jul 2016 | B1 |
20080086825 | Mullen | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20100212184 | Rudd, Jr. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20120285046 | Chapin | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20170135436 | Munro et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
20170258174 | Williams | Sep 2017 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
PI0600995 | Nov 2007 | BR |
PI0604324 | Jun 2008 | BR |
PI1000911 | Jan 2012 | BR |
202012019252 | Feb 2015 | BR |
102595948 | Jul 2012 | CN |
2874794 | Mar 2006 | FR |
2010058262 | May 2010 | WO |
Entry |
---|
English translation of International Search Report received in related PCT application No. PCT/BR2019/050035, dated Apr. 10, 2019; 3 pages. |
English translation of Written Opinion received in related PCT application No. PCT/BR2019/050035, dated Jan. 10, 2019; 6 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20200405004 A1 | Dec 2020 | US |