Companies that operate within the geotechnical construction industry often engage in a variety of different excavation projects to install a variety of different structures. For instance, these companies may install a series of lattice towers or mono pole towers that collectively carry power lines or the like from one location to another. In some instances, however, the locations of these tower sites are remote and virtually inaccessible. Because of this inaccessibility, these companies employ techniques to install these towers with fewer materials and smaller tools than compared to traditional techniques used at more accessible sites. While these companies have proven successful at installing structures at remote and inaccessible sites, other more efficient and cost-effective techniques may exist.
The detailed description is described with reference to the accompanying figures. In the figures, the left-most digit(s) of a reference number identifies the figure in which the reference number first appears. The same numbers are used throughout the drawings to reference like features and components.
The disclosure describes, in part, apparatuses and methods for installing structures (e.g., foundations, footings, anchors, abutments, etc.) at work sites, such as difficult-access work sites. For instance, this disclosure describes an apparatus that includes a drill mounted to a rotating member and a sliding member, the combination of which couples to a platform. An operator may employ this rotating drill assembly to excavate a radial array of shafts and thereafter install a radial array of piles, such as a radial array of micropiles. In addition, because this rotating drill assembly comprises multiple detachable components as described in detail below, these components may be transported to a difficult-access work site and assembled directly over a predetermined target at the site. For instance, these components may be flown into the site via a helicopter, driven into the site by trucks or hoisted into the site via a crane and assembled onsite to create the rotating drill assembly.
This disclosure also describes processes for architecting custom structure designs (e.g., pile designs) based at least in part on geotechnical characteristics of particular excavation sites, as well on load requirements of the structure to be attached. For instance, an operator may employ the rotating drill assembly discussed above to perform one or more in-situ (on-site) penetration tests for a particular site. With the results of the penetration tests, the operator or another entity may determine the geotechnical characteristics of the site. The operator or another entity may then use this information in conjunction with a decision matrix described below to determine varying aspects of the structure design, such as a pile design or the like.
For instance, the operator may use the geotechnical characteristics of the site and the decision matrix determine a number of piles to include in a design, a length of a casing of the piles or a bond length of the piles. In some instances, the operator may perform this process at the excavation site and just prior to excavating the shafts and installing the piles. As such, this process may allow the operator to create a custom pile design tailored exactly to the characteristics of the work site just prior to implementing the pile design. Furthermore, in instances where the operator installs a series of structures, such as tower foundations at a tower site, the operator may create custom pile designs for each respective tower foundation as the operator progresses across the tower site.
In addition, this disclosure describes different structural caps that may be used to couple a group of pile together with one another. First, this disclosure describes a structural cap that comprises an outer shell (e.g., made of metal or another material) and a cementitious containment area that may be filled onsite with a cementitious mixture. As described in detail below, this structural cap may provide a strength found in traditional concrete caps, while requiring far less concrete than traditional caps. As such, the structural cap remains lightweight and, thus, more portable to difficult-access sites.
In one example, once an operator installs a group of piles (e.g., a radial array of micropiles) at a difficult-access work site, the operator may couple the installed group of piles with a structural cap that has been transported to the difficult-access site. The operator may then fill the cementitious containment area of the cap with the cementitious mixture, thus reinforcing the structural cap and providing additional strength to the resulting foundation. After a relatively short cure time, the operator or another entity may then couple the secured group of piles to a structure, such as a tower leg or the like.
In addition, this disclosure describes multiple different structural caps for coupling structural members to a leg of a structure, such as a tower. For instance, one such cap includes bearing flanges at angles that match a batter angle of an installed group of piles. For instance, if a group of piles is designed to include a particular batter angle, θ, a cap may be similarly designed to include bearing flanges at the angle, θ. When an operator thereafter installs the cap to the group of piles, each pile may perpendicularly mate with an aperture of a respective bearing flange. Therefore, the cap may properly and securely couple to the piles with use of fasteners.
Another type of structural cap described herein employs sleeves that couple to the cap on one end and to a group of structural members on the other end. By doing so, the resultant structural cap (including the sleeves) provides for a fixed coupling between a leg of a structure (e.g., a leg of a lattice tower) and the multiple structural members within a foundation. In some instances, the sleeves are configured to be disposed over the ends of the multiple structural members protruding from the foundation. The cap may in turn couple to the sleeves, which may in turn couple to the leg of the structure via a mounting member (e.g., a “stub angle”). After the sleeves are disposed over the ends of the structural members, an operator may backfill voids of the sleeves with a cementitious material. By doing so, the resultant structural cap provides fixity between the foundation and the tower leg.
Another type of structural cap described herein employs a core having bearing flanges fixed on the perimeter of the core. Similar to the structural cap that comprises an outer shell and a cementitious containment area that may be filled onsite with a cementitious mixture (illustrated in
The discussion begins with a section entitled “Example Difficult-Access Work Site,” which describes one example environment in which the described apparatuses and methods may be implemented. A section entitled “Example Rotating Drill Assembly and Assembly Process” follows, and describes details of the rotating drill assembly from
Next, a section entitled “Example Process for Architecting Custom Structure Designs” illustrates and describes a process for creating custom designs (e.g., pile designs) based at least in part on geotechnical characteristics specific to a work site. This section also includes an example foundation schedule that includes a decision matrix for use with the process described immediately above. A section entitled “Example Structural Caps and Associated Process” follows. This section describes the example structural caps for coupling piles, anchors or the like with one another, as well as an example process for designing and installing these caps. A section entitled “Example Structural Cap with Sleeves and Associated Processes” and its several subsections follow. An additional section entitled “Example Structural Caps with a Core and Sleeves and Associated Processes” follows. Finally, a brief conclusion ends the discussion.
This brief introduction, including section titles and corresponding summaries, is provided for the reader's convenience and is not intended to limit the scope of the claims, nor the proceeding sections.
For instance, work site 100 illustrates an excavation site 102, a completed foundation 104 and an installed tower 106. Excavation site 102 represents a first stage of a process in constructing a tower at work site 100. Here, an operator of work site 100 may use a rotating drill assembly 108, described in detail below, to excavate one or more shafts, such as a radial array of shafts.
Next, foundation 104 represents a second stage in the process of constructing a tower. Here, the operator of the site has installed a family of radial-array, battered micropiles 110 within the excavated shafts. While
Finally,
Because work site 100 may comprise a remote and virtually inaccessible environment, helicopters, cranes or other transportation means may support work site 100. In these instances, these transportation means function to deliver materials and tools to work site 100. For instance, the helicopter illustrated in
For instance, returning to excavation site 102, the illustrated helicopter may transport components of rotating drill assembly 108 to work site 100. After the helicopter transports the components of drill assembly 108, an operator of work site 100 may assemble rotating drill assembly 108. In addition, the helicopter may transport the materials necessary to install micropiles 110, structural cap 112, as well as tower 106.
Having described one example environment in which the apparatuses and methods described in detail below may be implemented, the discussion moves to a discussion of rotating drill assembly 108 and an example process for assembling this drill assembly. The reader will appreciate, however, that difficult-access work site 100 comprises but one of many environments that may implement the described apparatuses and methods.
At each tower leg location 204(1)-(N) an operator of tower site 202 may first excavate one or more shafts to make way for a corresponding number of piles. For instance, the operator may install a radial array of micropiles at each tower leg location 204(1)-(N). In these instances,
With this illustration in mind, process 200 begins at operation 210, which represents locating common target location 206(1) for one pile group location 208(1). After locating common target location 206(1), an operator of the site may transport (e.g., via helicopter, crane, truck or the like) a platform base 212 to tower site 202. Platform base 212 generally comprises multiple (e.g., four) adjustable legs extending downward from respective corners of a platform. Additionally, platform base 212 further comprises a large, substantially circular opening for receiving a portion of the rotating drill assembly, described below. Of course, while the described implementation includes circular members, each component of rotating drill assembly 108 may comprise any shape or form in other implementations.
Process 200 continues at operation 214, which represents positioning platform base 212 over common target location 206(1). The operator may utilize the helicopter, crane or the like to position a center point 216 of platform base 212 over common target location 206(1). In addition, the operator may adjust the legs of platform base 212 to level the platform of platform base 212. That is, the operator may adjust the legs of platform base with the contour of the underlying ground in order to create a level surface on the top of platform base 212.
Process 200 continues with operation 218 at the upper right portion of
If the operator determines during operation 218 that the tolerance is not met (i.e. the platform base center point 216 is not within tolerance area 300), then the operator performs operation 220. Operation 220 instructs the operator to re-position platform base 212 so that platform base center point 216 is within tolerance area 300 and, therefore, so that the tolerance is met. With platform base center point 216 within tolerance area 300, platform base 212 provides a positioned first plane for the remaining portions of the drill to be properly assembled as described below. In some instances, this first plane comprises a flat and level plane upon which additional components of rotating drill assembly 108 may mount.
Process 200 continues with operation 222, illustrated at the lower-right portion of
When resting centering ring 302 on platform base 212, the operator may utilize a helicopter, crane or any other similar or different transportation mechanism. As described above, platform base 212 has been positioned over common target location 206(1) such that platform base center point 216 is within tolerance area 300. This allows the operator to rest centering ring 302 on platform base 212 such that a center point 304 of centering ring 302 is also within tolerance area 300 and, therefore, resides over common target location 206(1) within the predefined tolerance.
After the operator has performed operation 222, process 200 continues at
With the centering ring 302 properly adjusted such that centering-ring center point 304 is in-line with common target location 206(1) (i.e., is directly over target location 206(1)), the operator may choose to securely fix centering ring 302 to platform base 212. While the operator may choose to securely fix centering ring 302 in the adjusted position in any number of ways,
Process 200 continues with operation 226, illustrated at the lower-right portion of
In addition and as illustrated, both drill base slide plate 406 and rotating slide base 408 may also comprise respective large openings disposed in the middle of these components. When rotating slide base 408 (and drill base slide plate 406) mounts to centering ring 302, as described immediately below, the opening of rotating slide base 408 and drill base slide plate 406 may reside above the openings of centering ring 302 and platform base 212. Similar to these previously discussed openings, the openings of rotating slide base 408 and drill base slide plate 406 may receive a portion of a drill, as discussed below.
While process 200 describes mounting drill base slide plate 406 to rotating slide base 408 after adjusting centering ring 302 over common target location 206(1), in some instances drill base slide plate 406 may be mounted to rotating slide base 408 at any other sequence location of process 200. Furthermore, in other instances, drill base slide plate 406 may be integral with rotating slide base 408.
The upper right-hand portion of
Furthermore and as illustrated, these bearings may reside on an outer perimeter of rotating slide base 408 and/or centering ring 302. For instance, the bearings may reside two times closer, four times closer, etc. to an outer edge of the rotating slide base 408 or centering ring 302 than to a center point of these components.
In the illustrated embodiment, rotating slide base 408 rests on bearings 502 disposed on centering ring 302. Meanwhile, an inner circumference 504 of centering ring 302 provides a bearing surface for radial bearings 506 disposed on rotating slide base 408. As such, rotating slide base 408 securely attaches both axially and radially to centering ring 302. In addition, with use of centering-ring bearings 502 and radial bearings 506, rotating slide base 408 is configured to rotate 360 degrees in a clockwise and counter-clockwise direction on centering ring 302 and about a center point of rotating slide base 408. In addition, because rotating slide base 408 mates directly on top of centering ring 302, rotating slide base 408 also rotates about center point 304 of centering ring 302 and, hence, about common target location 206(1).
While process 200 describes resting rotating slide base 408 with drill base slide plate 406 on centering ring 302 at operation 228, other implementations rest rotating slide base 408 on centering ring 302 followed by mounting drill base slide plate 406 to rotating slide base 408.
After resting rotating slide base 408 on centering ring 302, an adjustable platform 508 configured to hold a drill and a motor has been defined and assembled. A top view 510 of this adjustable platform and a side view 512 of adjustable platform 508 are shown respectively in the middle and lower right-hand portions of
Finally, operation 230 completes process 200 at
As described more fully below, the operator may operate rotating drill assembly 108 by rotating adjustable platform 508, securing the platform in place and operating drill 602. Because each component of adjustable platform 508 includes an opening in the middle of the respective component, drill 602 may enter through the collective opening in the middle of adjustable platform 508 and into the drilling surface, as
The upper-left portion of
Next, the upper-right portion of
Finally, the lower portion of
In some instances, illustrated slide positions 802, 804 and 806 represent respective positions that an operator of the drill may employ to excavate a radial array of shafts at a predetermined diameter of a pile design. First, slide position 802 illustrates that a drill-hole center line resides behind a slide base center line. As such, slide position 802 represents a position where a portion of drill 602 penetrates adjustable platform 508 behind the slide base center line. Further, slide position 802 allows the drill to penetrate the platform behind center point 304 of centering ring 302, which aligns with common target location 206(1) as discussed above. By positioning drill base slide plate 406 in this manner, the operator is able to excavate a radial array of shafts at a relatively tight diameter of a pile design.
As mentioned above, centering-ring bearings 502 that are disposed along a perimeter of centering ring 302 and radial bearings 506 that are disposed along a perimeter of rotating slide base 408 enable slide position 802. That is, because both the bearings 502 and bearings 506 reside at an outer perimeter of adjustable platform 508 (rather than in a middle or center point of the platform), the adjustable platform provides an opening in the middle of the platform to receive a portion of drill 602. This opening at the center of the adjustable platform allows drill 602 to penetrate adjustable platform 508 in any of slide positions 802, 804 or 806 or in any other of a multitude of positions.
Slide positions 804 and 806, meanwhile, represent slide positions where the drill-hole center line resides in front of the slide-base center line. As such, an operator may use these slide positions to achieve respective array diameters that are greater than the array diameter achieved via slide position 802.
In order to secure rotating slide base 408 at a particular rotation position, adjustable platform 508 may include one or more index boreholes 908(1), 908(2), . . . , 908(N). As illustrated, index boreholes 908(1)-(N) are located near the outer perimeter of centering ring 302 and rotating slide base 408. In some instances, index boreholes 908(1)-(N) reside within both centering ring 302 and rotating slide base 408. As such, an operator may rotate rotating slide base 408 and mounted drill 602 to any index borehole locations relative to fixed centering ring 302 and may fasten rotating slide base 408 by inserting a pin or the like into one or more of index boreholes 908(1)-(N). While
In some instances, adjustable platform 508 may be designed to allow an operator to excavate a quantity of evenly-distributed array of shafts, with the quantity being a divisor or a multiple of 24. For instance, adjustable platform 508 may be designed to allow an operator to excavate an evenly-distributed array of shafts in the following quantities: 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24, 48 etc. To do so, rotating slide base 408 may comprise 24 index boreholes 908(1)-(N).
Process 1100 includes an operation 1102, which represents positioning drill 602 to a first index position 1104 associated with a location 1106 of a first pile to be installed at an example tower site. As arrow 1108 represents, an operator may rotate and secure rotating slide base 408 and drill 602 to first index position 1104. Next, process 1100 proceeds to operation 1110, which represents an operator adjusting drill 602 to a mast angle 1112. In some instances, mast angle 1112 matches a predetermined batter angle for the first pile.
At sub-operation 1114(1), an operator may determine a distance between a desired top of the radial array of piles and platform base 212 (i.e., the “deck”). To do so, the operator may first measure a distance between platform base 212 and a bottom of an excavation, upon which a bottom of a cement structural cap may sit after completion of the piles in implementations that employ such a cap. Next, the operator may measure a distance between the desired top of the radial array of piles and the bottom of the excavation. Finally, the operator may subtract the latter measured distance from the former measured distance to determine the distance between the desired top of the radial array of piles and the platform base 212.
With this distance information, along with the predetermined array diameter and batter angle, the operator may determine (e.g., mathematically or with reference to a chart) a linear location at which to station drill base slide plate 406 and drill 602 to achieve this diameter. After determining this linear location, the operator may proceed to position drill base slide plate 406 and drill 602 accordingly at sub-operation 1114(2). At this point, drill 602 of rotating drill assembly 108 points towards desired location 1106 of a first pile.
If, however, no available geotechnical data for the site exists, or if the available geotechnical data is determined to be improperly characterized for any reason, then process 1100 proceeds to operation 1120. Here, an operator may perform an in-situ (on-site) penetration test at a point of characterization 1300 to determine a geotechnical characteristic in the location 1106 associated with the first pile. This in-situ penetration test may comprise a Standard Penetration test (SPT) (as illustrated), a Cone Penetration Test (CPT), a penetration test that employs sound waves or any other similar or different test. Note that to perform this in-situ penetration test, the operator may employ rotating drill assembly 108, which has been properly set up to excavate first pile location 1106, as discussed above.
Point of characterization 1300, meanwhile, comprises a specified distance below ground. For instance, point of characterization 1300 may be, in some instances, more than one foot but less than six feet, or may comprise any other distance below ground. For instance, the operator may perform the in-situ penetration test at approximately three feet below ground measured from the bottom of the excavation.
After performing this penetration test at point of characterization 1300, the operator or another entity may classify, at operation 1122, the strata based on the results of the test. For instance, when the operator performs a Standard Penetration Test and determines a corresponding N-value (blows per foot) at the point of characterization, the operator may map this N-value to one of multiple defined soil conditions. For instance, the operator may determine whether this N-value corresponds to loose soil (e.g., 4<N<11), medium dense soil (e.g., 12<N<39), rock (e.g., N>40) or any other defined soil condition, possibly with reference to a decision matrix (an example of which is illustrated below in
After classifying the strata at the point of characterization, the operator may define a number of piles to install at the pile group at operation 1124. For instance, after mapping an N-value associated with point of characterization 1300 to a defined soil condition for the tower site, the operator may consult the decision matrix that defines how many piles to install based on the soil condition, load conditions and possibly multiple other additional factors. For instance, the decision matrix may indicate that the operator should install eight piles for loose soil, six piles for medium dense soil and four piles for rocky conditions for a tower scheduled to be installed at the tower site. While a few example values have been listed, it is to be appreciated that these values are simply illustrative and that these values may vary based on the context of the application (e.g., load conditions, etc.).
After determining a geotechnical characteristic (e.g., an N-value) at each interval, the operator may then use this information to determine a soil condition at each interval. With this information along with the previously-determined number of piles, the operator may consult the decision matrix mentioned above to determine a minimum casing embedment for the pile at operation 1128 based at least in part on determined soil conditions for the number of piles determined at operation 1124. The casing embedment may be defined, in some instances, as the length of permanent casing that extends beyond point of characterization 1300.
In the decision matrix, each type of soil condition at a tower site is associated with a minimum casing embedment for the determined number of piles. For instance, the decision matrix may state that for a four-pile group, the casing embedment length should be at least twelve feet for loose soil, ten feet for medium dense soil and nine feet for rock (see, for example, “Tower No. 29” in
In some instances, however, the upper strata may transition (e.g., between loose, medium dense, rock, etc.) before a minimum requirement is met for one continuous soil condition. If so, the decision matrix may require that the total length of the minimum casing embedment meet either or both of: (i) a minimum casing length for the weakest encountered soil condition in a combination of two or more soil of conditions, or (ii) a minimum casing length for a single soil condition.
For instance, returning to the four-pile-group example from above, envision that the operator determines (via interval testing) that the strata beneath point of characterization 1300 comprises eight feet of loose soil before transitioning to rock. As discussed above, the minimum required casing length for loose soil comprises twelve feet in this example, while the required casing length for rock comprises nine feet. Envision that the operator determines that rock continues past the eight feet of loose soil for four or more feet. Here, because loose soil comprises the weaker of the two soil conditions (loose soil and rock), the decision matrix determines that the minimum casing length for loose soil (twelve feet) has been satisfied by the twelve-foot combination of loose soil and rock.
In another instance, envision that the operator determines (via interval testing) that the strata beneath point of characterization 1300 comprises one foot of loose soil before transitioning to rock. Again, the minimum required casing length for loose soil comprises twelve feet, while the required casing length for rock comprises nine feet. Envision that the operator determines that rock continues past the one foot of loose soil for nine or more feet. Here, because the rock alone continues for at least the required nine feet, the decision matrix may determine that the rock satisfies the required minimum casing length. Here, the operator may install ten feet of casing, one foot of which will reside in loose soil and nine feet of which may reside in rock.
In addition, the operator may again consult the decision matrix to determine a minimum bond zone (i.e., a “minimum bond length”) for the determined number of piles, at operation 1130. In some instances, the minimum bond length is defined to be the minimum required amount of bond length of a continuous bearing unit. Again, the determination of the minimum bond length may be made with reference to interval N-values and the soil conditions associated therewith.
In contrast to the minimum casing length, the bond zone must consist of the minimum required bond length of a single continuous soil condition in some instances. Therefore, if the strata transitions in the bond zone, the total length of the bond zone must be extended to include the minimum required length of one continuous unit.
In one example, the decision matrix may require, for a four-pile group, a minimum bond length of 23.5 feet for loose, sixteen feet for medium dense and ten feet for rock. For instance, envision that the operator determines from N-values associated the above-referenced interval testing, that the twenty feet of ground below the casing length comprises loose soil before transitioning to medium dense soil for another ten feet. Here, while the combination of the loose soil and the medium dense soil (thirty feet) would meet the requirement of loose soil (23.5 feet), the decision matrix is not satisfied because the strata does not comprise a continuous soil condition or unit. Instead, envision that the operator determines that the proceeding ten feet of strata comprises rock. Here, the operator may determine via the decision matrix that this ten feet of continuous rock satisfies the minimum bond zone. Therefore, the operator may install a pile having a bond length that extends forty feet past the end of the casing (twenty feet in soil+ten feet in medium dense soil+ten feet in rock).
After determining a number of piles to install in the group and determining a minimum casing embedment and bond length, the operator may install the group of piles at operation 1132. More specifically, the operator may install the defined number of piles, each having a length of casing 1400 and a bond length 1402 that are equal to or greater than their respective minimum values. In addition, the operator may utilize other parameters from the decision matrix (e.g., pile type, casing diameter, rebar diameter, etc.) to install this pile group at the tower site.
If the geotechnical characteristics do differ by more than the threshold amount, then operations 1120 through 1132 may be repeated to determine a new quantity of piles, minimum casing embedment and/or bond length for these other piles. In other instances, the operator may repeat operations 1102 through 1132 for each pile, for each pile group, for each tower leg location or for each tower site, depending upon work site characteristics and other factors.
Foundation pile schedule 1600 first illustrates details 1602 regarding a series of towers that are scheduled to be coupled to respective foundations. Foundation pile schedule 1600 also includes details 1604 regarding these foundations and a decision matrix for architecting the details of the foundation designs. Foundation details include, for instance, a projection of the pile group, various elevations of the pile group, an array diameter and batter angle of the pile group, as well as casing and rebar diameters. In addition, the details include a number of piles, a minimum casing embedment, a minimum bond length and a micropile type. Each of these latter details may be dependent upon tower details 1602, other pile design parameters and soil conditions at the point of characterization and below this point as described with reference to process 1100.
As illustrated, outer shell 1702 may comprise a substantially circular base member and a substantially ring-shaped top member that is formed of metal (e.g., steel), plastic, or any other suitable material. In addition, the shell may comprise a containment wall attached perpendicularly on one side of the wall to a perimeter of the substantially circular base member and perpendicularly on an opposite side of the wall to the substantially ring-shaped top member.
As such, outer shell 1702 comprises a void within the shell that defines cementitious containment area 1704 configured to receive a cementitious mixture, such as cement or the like. In addition, bearing flanges 1706(1)-(N) may be arranged on along an outer perimeter of outer shell 1702. In some instances, structural cap 1700 may be designed to include an equal number of bearing flanges as a number of piles to which the cap is designed to couple with. For instance, a cap that is designed to secure a four-pile group of radial array battered micropiles may include four bearing flanges.
In these instances, each of bearing flanges 1706(1)-(N) may be further designed to include angle 1708 that matches a predetermined batter angle of the radial array of piles. As such, when a cap couples with the radial array of piles, each micropile may mate perpendicularly with a respective bearing flange. As such, the micropile may mate in a flush manner with the respective bearing flange, creating a secure interface between the pile and structural cap 1700.
In order to securely couple with each pile or other structural member, each of bearing flanges of structural cap 1700 may include a respective aperture 1712(1), 1712(2), . . . , 1712(N). In some instances, these apertures comprise an oval or circular aperture that receives a respective portion of a pile, such as a threaded bar of the like. After structural cap 1700 is placed on each pile of the radial array of piles, the cap may be secured in place via fasteners that couple to the threaded bar and reside on top of a respective bearing flange.
Furthermore, in some instances, apertures 1712(1)-(N) are designed to create a degree of tolerance between the respective bearing flange and the threaded bar of the battered micropile that the bearing flange receives. As such, an installer of structural cap 1700 may use this tolerance to ensure that each bearing flange of structural cap 1700 properly mates with a respective battered micropile.
As illustrated, mounting member 1710 attaches to a bottom center of outer shell 1702. More specifically, mounting member 1710 adjustably attaches via fasteners 1714 to the bottom member of the shell and protrudes out of the cementitious containment area 1704 to make a connection with the tower leg at a predetermined stub angle 1716 of the tower leg. Before connecting in this manner, however, mounting member 1710 may be adjusted into a position within the bottom center of cementitious containment area 1704 and securely fastened in place via fasteners 1714.
As the reader will appreciate, the adjustability of the mounting member 1710 allows the installer of cap 1700 to adjust mounting member 1710 to more precisely fit a location of the tower leg or other structural member to which cap 1700 couples. In addition, because mounting member 1710 attached to cap 1700 via fasteners 1714, this member is securely attached before the reception of the cementitious mixture, described immediately below.
After coupling structural cap 1700 to a group of piles or other structural members and after positioning mounting member 1710, an installer of the cap may proceed to fill cementitious containment area 1704 with a cementitious mixture, such as concrete or the like. After curing for a certain amount of time, the cementitious mixture functions to stiffen outer shell 1702 and support mounting member 1710.
As such, structural cap 1700 provides strength found in traditional concrete caps, while being of a lighter weight and requiring a lesser volume of materials than compared with traditional concrete caps. Hence, structural cap 1700 is more portable into a difficult-access work sites, such as work site 100. In addition, because structural cap 1700 requires far less cementitious mixture than traditional concrete caps, a cure time for installation of cap 1700 is much less, as is the required labor to install cap 1700. This smaller cure time and lesser labor enables the operator of work site 100 to more quickly and cost-effectively complete the series of foundations for the site. In addition to enabling quick and cost-effective installation, structural caps also enable for better quality control, as structural cap 1700 may be manufactured in a controlled environment (i.e., in a manufacturing facility) rather than in the field, as is common for concrete caps. In other words, the structural cap as described in
Finally,
Process 1900 includes determining, at operation 1902, characteristics of a group of piles or other members to which a structural cap will attach. For instance, operation 1902 may determine a number of piles, a batter angle of the piles, load conditions associated with the pile foundation and the like.
Next, operation 1904 represents forming a structural cap to comply with the determined characteristics. For instance, the cap may be designed to include a same number of bearing flanges as a number of piles in the foundation and a bearing flange angle that matches the determined batter angle. In addition, the dimensions of the cap may be engineered and designed to the meet the required load conditions.
At operation 1906, the formed structural cap is attached to the group of piles or other structural members, such as to a group of radial array battered micropiles, as described above. Operation 1908, meanwhile, represents adjusting a mounting member of the structural cap to receive a tower leg or other structural element. Next, operation 1910 represents filling the void of the cementitious mixture containment area with a cementitious mixture, such as concrete or the like. After allowing the mixture to cure at operation 1912, the operator may install the tower leg to the cured structural cap 1914.
As described above with respect to
Generally, securing structural caps to structural members (e.g., micropiles) via fasteners in this manner results in a pinned connection between the structural members and the resultant tower attached to the structural cap. Such a pinned connection provides the structural strength needed for some scenarios, such as when the structure attached to the structural cap comprises a monopole tower. In other design scenarios, however, a fixed connection between the structural members and the tower or tower leg provides better or more appropriate structural qualities.
For instance, pinned connections, such as the ones described above, effectively support towers that have a very high overturning moment relative to a low base shear, and a low compression load. Monopole towers often experience these kinds of loads and, hence, a pinned connection may work well when coupling a foundation to a monopole tower. However, pinned connections are less than ideal for towers that may experience a very high compression load relative to a high base shear and very small overturning moment. Instead, fixed connections effectively provide the strength needed for these connections. For example, these connections may work for latter towers, which include multiple legs, each coupled to respective foundation. Providing such fixity involves providing fixity to the connection of the leg of the tower to a structural cap and providing fixity between the structural cap and underlying structural members.
As illustrated, structural cap 2002 may include both a body 2006 and one or more bearing flanges 2008(1), 2008(2), . . . , 2008(N) arranged along a perimeter 2010 of the body 2006. Further, structural cap 2002 includes one or more sleeves 2012(1), 2012(2), . . . , 2012(N) coupled to a respective bearing flange 2008(1)-(N). As discussed in detail below, these sleeves 2012(1)-(N) fixedly couple the structural cap 2002 to the multiple piles 2004(1)-(N).
More specifically, and as illustrated, sleeve 2012(1) receives a portion 2014 of a pile, while another portion 2016 of the pile passes through both the sleeve 2012(1) and the bearing flange 2008(1) and protrudes distal from the bearing flange 2008(1). Furthermore, subsequent to disposing the structural cap 2002 on the multiple piles 2004(1)-(N), each sleeve 2012(1)-(N) is filled with a cementitious material for fixedly coupling the structural cap 2002 to the multiple piles 2004(1)-(N).
While the structural cap 2002 may be formed of metal (e.g., steel) in some instances, any other suitable material may be used. In addition, structural cap 2002 may be designed to include an equal number of bearing flanges as a number of piles to which the structural cap is designed to couple with. For instance, a structural cap that is designed to secure a four-pile, radial array of micropiles may include four bearing flanges. These flanges may be integral with the body 2006 of the structural cap, or the flanges may detachably couple to the body to allow an operator to attach the bearing flanges to the body at a difficult-access work site.
Similar to the structural caps described above with respect to
With the design described above, the structural cap 2002 provides fixity between the micropiles 2004(1)-(N), the cap itself, and the subsequently attached tower leg. More specifically, the grout-filled sleeves that reside over the micropiles help result in a structure that effectively handles a very high compression load, a relatively high base shear, and a very small overturning moment.
Again, structural cap 2102 includes one or more sleeves 2012(1)-(N) coupled to a respective bearing flange 2106(1)-(N). Further, each sleeve 2012(1)-(N) comprises a void 2110 to receive (1) a portion 2014 of a pile 2004(1)-(N), and (2) a cementitious mixture 2112 about the portion 2014 of a pile 2004(1)-(N). In other words, the purpose of the void 2110 is to receive the top of a pile along with a grout or other cementitious mixture in the remaining portion of the void that the pile does not fill. As such, the pile and the cementitious mixture fill all or substantially all of the void 2110.
While the port 2126 serves as a vent for the void 2110 when receiving the cementitious mixture 2112 as discussed above, other venting mechanisms are contemplated. For example, oversized aperture 2118 and aperture 2124 may vent the void 2110.
In some implementation, a sleeve may be placed over a pile such that the bottom of the sleeve contacts and rests against the ground in which the pile protrudes from. Here, the ground functions to effectively “close” the open end of void 2110, thus allowing the operator to fill the void 2110 with a cementitious mixture through the port 2126 or oversized aperture. That is, the operator may insert a grout or other material through the port or aperture, with the ground ensuring that the void of the sleeve that is not filled by the pile will be filled by the cementitious mixture.
In other instances, meanwhile, a pile may protrude from the ground to such a degree that the sleeve will not contact the ground when placed over the pile. That is, the length of the pile that protrudes from the ground may be longer than the length of the sleeve, as illustrated by the pile 2004(N) of
In instances where a structural cap is being coupled to multiple piles 2004(1)-(N) that are installed on a slope, the sleeves that reside on the uphill side of the slope may contact the ground, while the sleeves on the downhill side may not. As such, the sleeves that reside on the downhill side of the slope may include the packing ring 2132 for enclosing void 2110, while the uphill sleeves may not.
Furthermore, in some instances, the illustrated sleeves may be designed to have a larger void, thus creating a degree of tolerance between the respective sleeve 2012 and the portion 2014 of the pile the sleeve receives. As such, an installer of structural cap 2102 may use this tolerance to ensure that each sleeve 2012(1)-(N) of the structural cap 2102 properly mates with a respective battered micropile or other structural member. Likewise, in some instances, oversized aperture 2118 and aperture 2124 are designed to create a degree of tolerance between the plate 2114, bearing flange 2106(1)-(N), and the other portion 2016 of respective pile 2004(1)-(N) that the sleeve 2012(1)-(N) receives.
Finally, and as illustrated, each respective pile 2004(1)-(N) may couple to a respective sleeve and bearing flange via one or more fasteners 2140(A) and 2140(B). As discussed below, an operator may place the fastener 2140(B) at a particular vertical location on the top of the respective pile so as to level the top of the sleeve with other sleeves of the structural cap.
After an operator attaches structural cap 2102 to the pile group and after the cementitious mixture within the void 2110 cures, the operator may attach a tower leg or other structure to the cap and, hence, to the foundation. As discussed above with reference to
While
In some instances the mounting member may comprise both a stub angle protruding upwards from the cap and a plate disposed flush against the planar surface 2146 of the body 2104. When the body and the plate are circular in shape, the plate may be concentric with the center 2144 of the body 2104. In addition, the plate of the mounting member may further comprise through-holes arranged around a perimeter of the plate for receiving the threaded fasteners to couple the mounting member to the body of the cap. Again, the mounting member may also comprise a stub angle protruding from the plate. The stub angle may have been previously welded proximate to the center of the plate of the mounting member.
Furthermore, when attaching the mounting member to the body of the cap, an operator may interpose a fastening ring (or washer) between the plate of the mounting member and the body of the cap. In addition, the operator may include another fastening ring underneath the body of the cap prior to placing fasteners through the plate of the mounting member, the first fastening ring, the body of the cap and second fastening ring. To enable the operator to attach the mounting member, the fastening rings, and the body of the cap in this manner, each fastening ring may also have multiple through-holes for receiving the threaded fasteners. Prior to attaching the mounting member to the body of the cap, the operator may align the through-holes of the fastening rings, the plate of the mounting member, and the body of cap
In some instances, the through-holes of the fastening rings, the plate, and the body of the cap are oversized to allow the operator some tolerance when attaching the mounting member. That is, in instances where a group of piles has been installed at a location that is slightly different than the designed location, the operator may offset this difference by slightly adjusting where the mounting member attaches to the body of the cap. The oversized holes discussed immediately above enable such an offset.
With the design above, structural cap 2102 provides strength and fixity provided by traditional concrete caps while providing significant advantages over a concrete cap. For instance, structural cap 2102 is much lighter than a traditional concrete cap and requires a lesser volume of materials than compared with traditional concrete caps. Hence, structural cap 2102 is more portable into a difficult-access work sites, such as work site 100. In addition, because structural cap 2102 requires far less cementitious mixture than traditional concrete caps, a cure time for installation of cap 2102 is much less. Furthermore, the labor required to a concrete cap far exceeds the labor required to install structural cap 2102. This smaller cure time and quicker installation enables the operator of work site 100 to more quickly and cost-effectively complete the series of foundations for the site. Structural cap 2102 also enables for better quality control, as structural cap 2102 may be manufactured in a controlled environment (i.e., in a manufacturing facility) rather than in the field, as is common for concrete caps.
In the implementations shown in
For example,
Next, operation 2306 fixes multiple bearing flanges arranged along a perimeter of a body of the structural cap to each of the sleeves disposed on the portions of the structural members. To do so, each of the sleeves may be fastened to a respective bearing flange via threaded fasteners, via a weld, or in any other suitable manner.
At operation 2308, an operator clamps at least one packing ring to one of the structural members. As discussed above, the packing ring is disposed adjacent to an open end of the sleeve and encloses the sleeve to contain the cementitious material within the sleeve.
Next, operation 2310 represents filling each of the sleeves with a cementitious material, such as, grout, concrete, cement or the like, for fixedly coupling each of the sleeves to the portion of the respective structural member disposed in the sleeve. For instance, an operator of work site 100 may choose to back-fill the void of the sleeve via apertures and vent the void via a port while back-filling. After allowing the cementitious material to cure at operation 2312, the operator may install the tower leg to the structural cap having cured sleeves at operation 2314.
Process 2400 includes disposing, at operation 2402, a structural cap on the group of structural members. For instance, operation 2402 may dispose a structural cap comprising multiple sleeves respectively coupled to the multiple bearing flanges arranged along a perimeter of a body. Here, the bearing flanges are arranged substantially vertically along the perimeter of the body, with respective sleeves coupled to the bearing flanges. In this configuration, the structural cap may be directly disposed on the group of structural members along with the sleeves. Again, the sleeves are configured to receive a portion of each pile, such that the portion of the pile is disposed in a void of the sleeve.
Process 2400 also includes filling, at operation 2404, each of the sleeves with a cementitious material, such as concrete or the like, for fixedly coupling each of the sleeves to the portion of the respective structural member disposed in the sleeve. For instance, an operator of work site 100 may choose to back-fill the void of the sleeve via apertures and vent the void via a port while back-filling. After allowing the cementitious material to cure at operation 2406, the operator may install the tower leg to the cured structural cap at operation 2408.
As illustrated, structural cap 2502 may include a core 2504 having one or more bearing flanges 2008(1)-2008(N) arranged along a perimeter 2506 of the core 2504. The bearing flanges 2008(1)-2008(N) may be coupled to a respective sleeve 2012(1)-2012(N). As discussed in detail below, these sleeves 2012(1)-2012(N) are to fixedly couple the structural cap 2502 to the multiple piles 2004(1)-(N) or other structural members.
The core 2504 of structural cap 2502 may include a tube 2508 in between a top plate 2510 and a bottom plate 2512. One or more threaded fasteners 2514(1), 2514(2), . . . , 2514(P) may be tightened to secure the top plate 2510 and the bottom plate 2512 to the tube 2508. In some instances, the tube 2508, the top plate 2510, and the bottom plate 2512 may be separate from one another when dissembled, in other instances some or each of these components may be integral with one another. In each instance, when the top plate 2510 and the bottom plate 2512 are secured to the tube 2508, the core 2504 defines a void 2516. The void 2516 may receive a cementitious mixture via one or more ports 2518(1)-2518(Q) arranged around a center of the top plate 2510. In addition to providing an opening to receive the cementitious mixture into the void 2516, the one or more ports 2518(1)-2518(Q) may also vent the void 2516 of the core 2504 while receiving the mixture. As discussed in detail below, the core 2504 may fixedly couple the structural cap 2502 to a tower leg.
In this regard,
Each of the leveling couplers 2524(1)-2524(N) are configured to be in contact with each respective plate 2114 of each sleeve 2012(1)-2012(N). A fastening member 2526 (e.g., a post, a bar, a threaded bar, a notched bar, or the like) may be coupled distal to each leveling coupler 2524(1)-2524(N). The fastening member 2526 passes through both the sleeve 2012(1) and the bearing flange 2008(1) and protrudes distal from the bearing flange 2008(1). In these instances and as illustrated, each of the sleeves 2012(1)-(N) may further comprise a containment washer 2528 disposed adjacent to the open end 2134 of each of the sleeves 2012(1)-(N) distal to each of the plates 2114, respectively.
The containment washer 2528 encloses the void 2110. As such, an operator that is on site may slip the containment washer 2528 onto each pile 2004(1)-(N) prior to disposing each sleeve 2012(1)-2012(N) on each leveling coupler 2524(1)-2524(N). As illustrated, the containment washer 2528 may include an electrically-conductive fastener 2530. The conductive fastener 2530 may fasten a containment washer 2528 adjacent to the open end 2134 of each of the sleeves 2012(1)-(N) distal to each of the plates 2114, respectively. The conductive fastener 2530 may electrically ground the structural cap 2502 to a pile 2004(1)-(N). For example, the electrically-conductive fastener 2530 may be a J-bolt hooked on an end of the portion 2522 of a pile 2004(1)-(N) received by a sleeve 2012(1)-(N), respectively, and the threaded end of the J-bolt may be fastened to the containment washer 2528 disposed adjacent to the open end 2134 of the sleeves 2012(1)-(N). The operator may then proceed to fill the remaining portion of the void 2110 with a cementitious mixture, such as grout, for fixedly coupling the structural cap 2502 to the multiple piles 2004(1)-(N).
While the structural cap 2502 may be formed of metal (e.g., steel, galvanized steel, or the like) in some instances, any other suitable material may be used. In addition, structural cap 2502 may be designed to include an equal number of bearing flanges 2008(1)-(N) as a number of piles to which the structural cap 2502 is designed to couple with. For instance, a structural cap 2502 that is designed to secure a four-pile, radial array of micropiles may include four bearing flanges 2008(1)-(N). These flanges 2008(1)-(N) may be integral with the core 2504 of the structural cap 2502, or the flanges 2008(1)-(N) may detachably couple to the core 2504 to allow an operator to attach the bearing flanges to the body at a difficult-access work site.
Similar to the structural caps described above with respect to
Also similar to the structural caps described above with respect to
As the reader will appreciate, the adjustability of the mounting member 1710 allows the installer of structural cap 2502 to adjust the mounting member 1710 to more precisely fit a location of the tower leg or other structural member to which structural cap 2502 couples. In addition, because the mounting member 1710 may be attached to the structural cap 2502 via fasteners 2514(1)-2514(P), the mounting member 1710 is securely attached before the reception of the cementitious mixture, described below.
With the design described above, the structural cap 2502 provides fixity between the micropiles 2004(1)-(N), the structural cap 2502 itself, and the subsequently attached tower leg. More specifically, the grout-filled core 2504 fixed to the stub angle and the grout-filled sleeves 2012(1)-2012(N) that reside over the micropiles help result in a structure that effectively handles a very high compression load, a relatively high base shear, and a very small overturning moment.
Further, and as discussed above, the number of bearing flanges on a particular structural cap may equal the number of piles or other structural members to which the structural cap is designed to couple with. As discussed above with respect to
As illustrated, the mounting member 1710 may be fixed substantially proximate to a center 2702 of the top plate 2510 opposite to the post member 2520 fixed on the other side of the top plate 2510. For example, the mounting member 1710 may be welded substantially proximate to the center 2702 of the top plate 2510 opposite to the post member 2520 welded on the other side of the top plate 2510.
While
Next, operation 3008 fixes multiple bearing flanges arranged along a perimeter of a core of the structural cap to each of the sleeves disposed on the leveling couplers and the portions of the structural members. To do so, each of the sleeves may be fastened to a respective bearing flange via threaded fasteners, via a weld, or in any other suitable manner.
Operation 3008 may be followed by operation 3010. Operation 3010 represents an operator of a site leveling each of the sleeves, via the leveling couplers, using a leveling jig or through another iterative process. For example, an operator of a site may raise and/or lower each sleeve to achieve a level plane. Further, an operator of a site may raise and/or lower each sleeve to achieve a level plane of a structural cap. In some instances, one or more of the sleeves are integral with a body of a structural cap, while in other instances the sleeves couple to the body of the cap after being placed on the structural members, as discussed below.
Process 3000 continues on
Next, operation 3014 represents adjusting a position of a mounting member. For example, the mounting member fixed to a top plate may move translationally and/or rotationally relative to the core of the structural cap. The adjustability of the mounting member allows the installer of structural cap to adjust the mounting member to more precisely fit a location of a leg of a tower to which structural cap couples.
Next, operation 3016 represents filling the void of the core of the structural cap with a cementitious material, such as, grout, concrete, cement or the like, for fixedly coupling the structural cap to a tower leg or other structural member. For instance, an operator of work site 100 may choose to back-fill the void of the core via apertures and vent the void via a port while back-filling.
Next, operation 3018 represents filling each of the voids of the sleeves with the cementitious material for fixedly coupling each of the sleeves to the portion of the respective structural member disposed in the sleeve. For instance, an operator of work site 100 may choose to back-fill the void of the sleeve via apertures and vent the void via a port while back-filling. After allowing the cementitious material to cure at operation 3020, the operator may install the tower leg to the structural cap having cured core and cured sleeves at operation 3022.
Although the subject matter has been described in language specific to structural features and/or methodological acts, it is to be understood that the subject matter defined in the appended claims is not necessarily limited to the specific features or acts described. Rather, the specific features and acts are disclosed as exemplary forms of implementing the claims.
This application claims the benefit of the filing date of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/325,221 filed on Apr. 16, 2010, which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3328969 | Murphy et al. | Jul 1967 | A |
3590930 | Gronfors | Jul 1971 | A |
3946570 | Freydier | Mar 1976 | A |
3992831 | Bukovitz et al. | Nov 1976 | A |
4023325 | Paverman | May 1977 | A |
4068445 | Bobbitt | Jan 1978 | A |
4606155 | Bukovitz et al. | Aug 1986 | A |
4735527 | Bullivant | Apr 1988 | A |
5213169 | Heller | May 1993 | A |
5226488 | Lessard et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5256004 | Gemmi et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5873679 | Cusimano | Feb 1999 | A |
5908268 | Yabuuchi | Jun 1999 | A |
6012874 | Groneck et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6354766 | Fox | Mar 2002 | B1 |
7618217 | Henderson | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7993107 | Gevers | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8109057 | Stark | Feb 2012 | B2 |
20090307998 | Zavitz et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120096786 A1 | Apr 2012 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61325221 | Apr 2010 | US |