The present invention relates to structural cardboard runners, and pallets and shipping articles for material handling. The present invention relates especially to a pallet including cardboard runners, but is not limited to only runners, nor only pallets.
Traditional wood pallets are expensive to purchase and maintain. Further, they are not always easily disposed of. In particular, disposal of wood pallets can be problematic in large cities where downtown is congested, because trucks cannot wait at drop off sites. Instead, the trucks must make a return trip (i.e., an “empty run”) to the drop off site through traffic and congestion to pick up empty pallets, wasting considerable time and adding substantially to shipping expense.
Cardboard has been used to make pallets and runners of pallets. However, known pallets that incorporate cardboard often lack durability and strength. Further, cardboard runners are problematic because runners experience “horizontal abuse” from fork truck tines as they engage and disengage a pallet to move and/or position the pallets on storage racks, and further experience “vertical abuse” as heavy packages put downward pressure on the runner against uneven ground support and/or storage racks and/or wet surfaces.
In one aspect of the present invention, a structural beam is provided for use in pallets, where the beam includes a cardboard sheet having a length adapted to match a pallet dimension, the sheet being folded in a width direction to include a cross section with a first portion forming an M shape, a second portion folded across the M shape to form two closed triangles, and a third portion folded around the M shape including sections along and adjacent a first outer leg of the M shape and across the M shape and along and adjacent a second outer leg of the M shape. Adhesive bonds the third portion to the first and second portions. The arrangement forms a beam of sufficient structural rigidity to support the vertical and horizontal “abuse” often received by runners of pallets.
In a narrower aspect of the present invention, notches sufficient for fork lift tines are cut into the length of the folded sheet at locations spaced from each other and spaced from ends of the length for matching a typical location of the fork lift tines.
In a narrower aspect of the present invention, a pallet is made comprising a deck and at least three of the structural beams defined above attached to a bottom of the deck as runners. The deck can be cardboard or other material.
In another aspect of the present invention, a pallet includes a plurality of parallel tubular structural runners made of stiff sheeting, a plurality of structural cross beams made of similar stiff sheeting and positioned orthogonally on the runners, and a deck attached atop the runners and cross beams. The runners and cross beams each include a cross section with internal walls forming an M shape and further with a perimeter wall enclosing the internal walls to form a tubular shape. The runners and cross beams each have mating first notches spaced from but near ends thereof and at least one mating notch at an intermediate location with a size and depth of the first notches and mating notch being such that the runners and cross beams fit snugly matably together at each cross location to form orthogonally-strong structural connections. At least the runners further have second notches for receiving tines of a fork truck.
The present invention further includes an article for shipping a product, the article including a plurality of tubular elongated structural beams made of stiff sheeting, the structural beams each including a cross section with internal walls forming an M shape and further with a perimeter wall enclosing the internal walls to form a tubular shape; extending orthogonally to each other to define twelve edges of a box shape. A plurality of corner pieces at each corner of the box shape for supporting a product therein for shipment.
These and other aspects, objects, and features of the present invention will be understood and appreciated by those skilled in the art upon studying the following specification, claims, and appended drawings.
A pallet 20 (
The present runner forms a structural beam that is surprisingly and unexpectedly strong and durable, and that is well suited for use as a runner to provide sufficient structural rigidity to withstand the stress and the vertical and horizontal “abuse” often received by pallets. For example, my testing showed that the illustrated runner can hold up to 5,000 pounds using 42 DW Cor corrugated cardboard. I believe this strength and stability comes in large part from the V-shaped internal support that stabilizes the outer “box” of the runner in diagonal directions from opposing corners to a center-point of a wall opposite the corners, thus providing optimal structure to prevent a parallelogram-type collapse. This V-shape has been found to be stronger than other configurations that I have tested, including X, W, Z and single-angled-wall shapes. Also, the double walls on the opposing sides and top of the runner provide strength in a manner well suited for cardboard sections held together by adhesive bonding since they provide large flat surface areas. The double walls also provide protection for the internal structural diagonally-strong V shape. It contemplated that an additional section of cardboard can be extended across the bottom of the runner to form a double wall completely around the M shaped portion of the runner if desired, such as if additional material is desired at a bottom of the runner where supporting surfaces rub (i.e. racks and/or floor surfaces). Also, it is contemplated that the present runner can be used with the “M” shaped portion being either inverted (see
Different cardboards and sheets can be used for the present runner. As noted above, 42 DW Cor corrugated cardboard works well based on testing for typically sized runners and pallet loads. However, other corrugated cardboards can be used, such as 32 C, 44 C, 42 DW*, and 42 DW.
The illustrated deck is also made of cardboard material. It is contemplated that the same cardboard can be used for the runner, or it can be a different grade of cardboard or paper sheet material. Further, a sheet other than cardboard can be used if desired, such as wood, plastic, or composite, and also the sheet can be treated to include properties desired for particular applications. Notably, the present runner 22 presents a large flat top surface and large bonding area for receiving adhesive. This adds considerably to a strength of the overall pallet, due to the large bonding area. Also, where corrugated cardboard is used for both the runner and the deck, with the bonded corrugated sheets extending in parallel juxtaposed positions where they support each other and also help distribute stress.
A modified pallet 20A (
By this arrangement, the marginal material around the notches 50A is supported by the criss-crossed runners 22A, such that they form orthogonally rigid joints when connected. Further, the notches 50A into the internal M shape cut the angled walls formed by portions 24A-25A to a half-height. These half-height angled walls engage mating parts of the criss-crossed runner 22A, thus further strengthening the joint. The criss-crossed connection of runners 22A is quick, relatively easy, and very effective in strength and function, especially when bonded with a glue or adhesive. Further, adhering the top deck 21A to the orthogonal matrix of runners 22A further rigidifies the pallet 20A. It is noted that the illustrated deck 21A is flush with an end of the runners in one direction, but extends about an inch off the end of the perpendicular runners. It is contemplated that the deck can be modified as desired for particular applications, such as by having slits or holes as desired to anchor product thereon. It is also contemplated that an outer edge can be doubled back onto the deck if desired to create a physical lip around a part or all of the pallet's perimeter. It is contemplated that the notches 49A for receiving fork truck tines can be on all runners 22A if desired, thus permitting a fork truck to engage its tines from any of the four sides of the pallet 20A.
Structural beams 22B, 22B′, 22B″ (
Notably, a variety of different pieces can be used in place of the illustrated foam corner pieces 63B, and also that the corner pieces can be a variety of different shapes depending on their functional requirements. For example, the foam corner pieces 63B define a channel 65B for receiving the long beams 22B, but the vertical end beams 22B′ engage an outer surface 66B of the corner pieces 63B, and the horizontal end beams 22B″ engage a top (or bottom) surface 67B of the corner pieces 63B. Contrastingly, the modified foam piece 63C includes channels 65C, 66C, and 66C for receiving each of the beams 22B, 22B′, and 22B″, respectively. It is contemplated that the corner pieces can include more or less channels, and be made of different materials (such as cardboard or other plastic rather than foam), and also can be simply a sheet to separate the product from the cardboard runner (where the product has an aesthetic surface that can be scratched).
It is to be understood that variations and modifications can be made on the aforementioned structure without departing from the concepts of the present invention, and further it is to be understood that such concepts are intended to be covered by the following claims unless these claims by their language expressly state otherwise.
This application claim benefit under 35 U.S.C. §119(e) of provisional application Ser. No. 61/024,304, filed Jan. 29, 2008, entitled PALLET WITH CARDBOARD RUNNER, the entire contents of which are incorporated herein in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2444183 | Cahners | Jun 1948 | A |
2728545 | Hermitage | Dec 1955 | A |
2965276 | Foster | Dec 1960 | A |
3006590 | Hoag | Oct 1961 | A |
3434435 | Achermann et al. | Mar 1969 | A |
3776146 | Morrison | Dec 1973 | A |
3861326 | Brown | Jan 1975 | A |
3911834 | Quaintance | Oct 1975 | A |
3921892 | Macie | Nov 1975 | A |
4102525 | Albano | Jul 1978 | A |
4185565 | Nymoen | Jan 1980 | A |
4244766 | Yellen | Jan 1981 | A |
4445614 | Mitsumori et al. | May 1984 | A |
4487136 | Beckway | Dec 1984 | A |
4563377 | Melli | Jan 1986 | A |
4574955 | Camossi | Mar 1986 | A |
4671188 | Betro et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
4850284 | DeGroot et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4979446 | Winebarger | Dec 1990 | A |
5037027 | Nichols | Aug 1991 | A |
5184558 | Wozniacki | Feb 1993 | A |
5207631 | Schmidtke et al. | May 1993 | A |
5218913 | Winebarger et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5275279 | Grigsby | Jan 1994 | A |
5289781 | Beckway | Mar 1994 | A |
5337679 | Moorman | Aug 1994 | A |
5339746 | Vannatta | Aug 1994 | A |
5350066 | Mendoza et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5357875 | Winebarger et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5370061 | Kilpatrick et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5385625 | LaFreniere | Jan 1995 | A |
5406892 | Kilpatrick et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5423270 | Kilpatrick et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5427019 | Moorman | Jun 1995 | A |
5433156 | Hutchison | Jul 1995 | A |
5450998 | Esse et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5469795 | Moorman | Nov 1995 | A |
RE35131 | Youell, Jr. et al. | Dec 1995 | E |
5483875 | Turecek et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5487345 | Winebarger et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5520120 | Badger | May 1996 | A |
5528994 | Iseli | Jun 1996 | A |
5535668 | Besaw et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
D374324 | Besaw | Oct 1996 | S |
5564344 | Downes, Jr. et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5568774 | Hutchison | Oct 1996 | A |
5569148 | LaFreniere et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5603258 | Besaw | Feb 1997 | A |
5609111 | Hasegawa et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5622306 | Grigsby, Sr. | Apr 1997 | A |
5660119 | Perkins | Aug 1997 | A |
5669315 | Model | Sep 1997 | A |
5672412 | Phares et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5713289 | Model | Feb 1998 | A |
D395534 | Besaw | Jun 1998 | S |
5794542 | Besaw | Aug 1998 | A |
5881652 | Besaw | Mar 1999 | A |
5904103 | Maresh et al. | May 1999 | A |
5996510 | Harpman et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6029582 | Ogilvie, Jr. et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6041718 | Brandes et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6135030 | Besaw | Oct 2000 | A |
6173658 | Moberg | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6354229 | Heidtke | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6539880 | Simms | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6564724 | Moberg | May 2003 | B2 |
6948434 | Horiuchi | Sep 2005 | B2 |
7000549 | Nelson | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7007613 | Sketo | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7475639 | Chen | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7654390 | Baechle et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7673569 | Ishikawa et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
20060102517 | Chen | May 2006 | A1 |
20060108408 | Lowry | May 2006 | A1 |
20070068426 | Teags et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090188411 A1 | Jul 2009 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61024304 | Jan 2008 | US |