The present invention relates to a glazing system for a building, to mountings and fittings for use in such glazing systems to secure a glazing panel to a building, and to methods of improving the impact resistance of a glazing panel.
Frameless glazing systems for buildings are well known. Buildings incorporating a structural glass facade or curtain wall incorporating the Pilkington PLANAR™ glazing system are one such example. This type of structural glazing system comprises a plurality of glazing panels ranging typically in size between 1 m×1 m and 2.5 m×4.5 m, wherein each glazing panel is independently secured to an adjacent support structure via mechanical mountings and fittings. Each glazing panel usually comprises a sheet of glass that has been toughened and may be laminated to meet specific legislative requirements. Each glazing panel may be double or triple glazed to provide increased environmental performance.
In such frameless glazing systems, each glazing panel usually has a number of holes drilled through it, which may be straight or countersunk bores, for securing a mechanical fitting thereto. For a rectangular glazing panel the fixing holes or bores are usually in the vicinity of each corner and a mechanical fixing is connected to the glazing panel via each bore. Depending upon the size of the glazing panel, additional holes may be located at other positions around the periphery of the panel.
A glazing fitting passes through a bore in the glazing panel and is secured to the glazing panel by a suitable screw assembly. The glazing fitting usually has a hook that projects into the interior of the building. The hook is then connected to a suitable mounting comprising a mounting member that is secured to a suitable adjacent structural support element forming part of the building. The glazing fitting and mounting member are usually made of the same grade of stainless steel although mechanical strengths can be varied as required by design. An assembly comprising such a glazing fitting and mounting are used with the Pilkington PLANAR™ structural glass systems, commercial examples of such assemblies being known as 905 fittings.
When used as an exterior wall or facade on a building, such glazing fitting and mounting assemblies are specified by the engineer to be of sufficient strength to support the applied wind load. Equally, the two elements of the assembly are designed with sufficient tolerance and clearances to provide for adequate thermal expansion and building movement by rotation and translation of the mounting member within the glazing fitting which is attached to the glazing panel.
However for certain weather conditions the pure mechanical strength of an assembly designed in a conventional manner for wind load, thermal expansion and building movement is not sufficient. For example, in hurricane conditions, where airborne debris can impact upon the glazing panels, the standard mechanical assembly may not have sufficient strength or flexibility to withstand such a mechanical impact.
The impact resistance of a glazing system is influenced by many factors, for example, the material from which the glazing panel is made (which is usually glass), whether the glazing panel is laminated or not, the type of interlayer material specified for the laminate and the size of the glazing panel.
For a glazing panel comprising a single glass sheet, toughening the glass sheet (either thermally or chemically) strengthens the glass sheet thereby improving impact resistance. Thermally toughened glass sheets may be heat soaked to avoid potential problems with nickel sulphide inclusions. A glazing panel comprising two glass components and an interlayer material such as PVB is another known method of improving impact resistance. Dependent upon the particular application, for a glazing panel to be classified as impact resistant, the panel will usually be required to meet certain legislative standards by passing recognised test methods appropriate to the application.
To be classed as hurricane impact resistant in certain states of the USA, the glazing system must comply with specific Building Codes. In particular, the International Building Code (IBC), the International residential Code (IRC), the Florida Building Code (FBC) and the Texas Department of Insurance (TDI) form a central part of the minimum building standards designed to protect buildings from high wind events such as hurricanes. This family of building codes considers, amongst other things, curtain walls as part of the building envelope which may therefore be subjected to damage from flying debris during a high wind event. Prevention of a building envelope breach is critical not only to the continued structural integrity of the building due to resultant over pressurisation, but also to the protection of the building contents and occupants. Internationally recognised standard ASTM E 1996-08 provides a standard specification for defining the performance of a glazing system when impacted by windborne debris in a hurricane.
At present hurricane impact performance of windows has been improved by using laminated glazing panels. A typical hurricane impact resistant laminated glass panel comprises an interlayer material bonded between two panes of glass. A particularly suitable interlayer material is available from Du Pont™ and is sold as SentryGlas®. Compared to a conventional PVB interlayer, SentryGlas® is more rigid and tough and is therefore able to contribute to the increased ability of a glass panel to remain unbreached and in place when subjected to the above mentioned impact tests.
For a glazing panel comprising a glass sheet that is supported by mechanical fittings via holes in the glazing panel rather than being fitted into a conventional frame, the limiting factor for the glazing panel wind load capacity and impact resistance becomes the area of glass and interlayer which is in the immediate vicinity of the holes through which the glazing fittings pass. In this area surrounding the hole, the interlayer and glass are both vulnerable to higher localised loads, distortions and stresses. This makes achieving the required level of wind load and impact performance for such a glazing assembly difficult.
This type of generic bolted system has previously been known to secure panes of glass in the construction of frameless display cases, shop windows, feature glazing for commercial buildings and the like. One example of such a generic bolted system is described in GB 311,616. The shank of a screw passes through a hole in a glass sheet and is screwed into a clip. A rubber washer backed by a metal washer is placed under the screw head and the glass pane is secured by the clip and the washers. Such an attachment assembly is not suitable for providing a glazing assembly that will pass current impact legislation, in particular the hurricane high wind load and impact tests mentioned above.
In JP08-333,831A a fastener for a wall body panel is disclosed. The fastener is used to improve the wind resistance of the panel. For a wind load applied substantially normal to the body panel, the fastener allows the body panel to move in the direction of the applied wind load.
FR 2 738 271 discloses a fixing for attaching a glass panel to a building. The fixing has a support shaft having a bulged portion along the central portion thereof. A glazing fitting having a hook portion is attached to a glass panel and the fixing is connected to the hook portion via the bulge portion. Such a fixing finds particular application against the effects of wind load.
It is possible to improve the impact performance of a laminated glazing panel by using an interlayer that extends beyond the panes of glass in the laminate, as described in US2003/0188498A1. The exposed interlayer is then bonded into the surrounding framework or onto adjacent metal lugs forming part of the framework. This solution is not possible for a frameless glazing assembly of the type described above, because there is no frame surrounding each glazing plane into which the interlayer can be bonded.
Another solution described in the October 2007 edition of Glass Magazine is to bond a glazing fitting onto a face of the glazing pane using a strong structural adhesive, thereby eliminating the need to have any holes in the glazing panel at all and the associated vulnerabilities. Such systems have been developed for frameless glazing systems such as curtain walls and facades, but require the use of specialist adhesives that are applied in controlled environments to achieve the necessary durability and UV stability of the connection. There can be high costs associated with such a method.
The present invention aims to provide an alternative solution to the problem of improving the impact resistance of a glazing panel, in particular a glazing panel comprising a glass sheet and having a mechanical fitting secured thereto via a bore therein.
Accordingly the present invention provides from a first aspect a glazing system for a building comprising a glazing panel, a support and an attachment assembly for attaching the glazing panel to the support, the attachment assembly comprising a mounting secured to the support and a glazing fitting secured to the glazing panel, the mounting comprising a mounting member and the glazing fitting comprising a hook portion, the mounting being connected to the glazing fitting by a connection between the hook portion and the mounting member, characterised in that the attachment assembly further comprises a shock absorber that allows the attachment assembly to move relative to the support upon applying an impact to the glazing panel, thereby improving the impact resistance of the glazing panel.
A shock absorber is used when one component is connected to another and provides the connection with the ability to dampen a shock wave and dissipate kinetic energy collected from a high velocity impactor.
Such a glazing system has an improved resistance to mechanical impact compared with other known glazing systems.
Preferably the mounting is secured to the support by a securing member that passes through a bore in the support, and the shock absorber surrounds the securing member.
Preferably the shock absorber is located in the bore in the support.
In some embodiments, the shock absorber is mounted on a hollow rigid member.
In some embodiments, the shock absorber is substantially annular.
Preferably the shock absorber is compressible. Preferably the shock absorber comprises at least one rubber ring.
In a most preferred embodiment the shock absorber comprises three rubber o-rings.
Suitably the shock absorber is physically separate from the mounting member.
In another preferred embodiment, the shock absorber is associated with the hook portion of the glazing fitting. Suitably the shock absorber is an integral component of the glazing fitting.
Embodiments of the first aspect of the invention have other preferable features. Preferably the mounting member is connected with the glazing fitting such that upon applying an impact to the glazing panel the glazing fitting can rotate relative to the mounting member. Preferably the mounting member has a bulbous portion and the glazing fitting is connected to the mounting member via the bulbous portion.
Preferably the glazing panel comprises a laminate material. Preferably the glazing comprises a glass sheet bonded to the laminate material. Preferably the laminate material is of a type used to provide a hurricane impact resistant glass panel. Preferably the glass panel passes ASTM E 1996-08. Suitably the glazing panel passes impacts as defined by ASTM E 1996-08 with a large missile type ranging from performance levels A through D.
Preferably the glazing system is part of a structural facade or curtain wall.
Preferably the glazing system is part of a building.
Suitably the shock absorber is irreversibly compressible.
Suitably the glazing panel comprises a glass sheet having a bore therein, and the glazing fitting is secured to the glazing panel via the bore.
The glazing panel may be an insulating unit. The glazing panel may comprise two spaced sheets of glass with a peripheral edge seal thereby defining an air gap between the two glass sheets. The insulating unit may comprise three glass sheets.
The present invention also provides from a second aspect a mounting for attaching a glazing panel to a building, the mounting being configured to be secured to the building by a securing member that passes through a bore in a structural element of the building, the mounting comprising a mounting member being connectable with a glazing fitting secured to the glazing panel, the glazing panel being attachable to the building by connecting the mounting member to the glazing fitting, wherein there is a shock absorber associated with the mounting configured such that when the glazing panel is attached to the building, the glazing panel has an improved impact resistance, characterised in that the shock absorber is locatable in the bore in the structural element.
Preferably the shock absorber is compressible.
Preferably the shock absorber is mounted on a hollow rigid member that is locatable in the bore in the structural support element, wherein the hollow rigid member is configured such that the securing member is able to pass through the hollow rigid member. This has the advantage that the support member may be secured to the structural support element without compressing the shock absorber, whilst still maintaining a sufficiently rigid connection with the structural element.
In some embodiments, the mounting is connectable with the glazing fitting such that upon applying an impact to the glazing panel the mounting member is rotatable relative to the glazing fitting. This provides the advantage that the applied impact may be further dissipated by movement of the glazing panel.
In other embodiments, the mounting member has a stem portion that has a bulbous portion along the length thereof. Preferably the mounting member is connectable with the glazing fitting via the bulbous portion.
Embodiments according to the second aspect of the invention have other preferable features. Preferably the shock absorber is substantially annular. Suitably the shock absorber comprises a rubber ring. Suitably the shock absorber comprises 3 rubber o-rings. Preferably the glazing panel comprises a sheet of glass. Suitably the glazing panel has an improved impact resistance to a high speed large body impact.
Preferably the mounting member is configured such that upon applying a sufficiently high impact, at least a portion of the applied impact causes the mounting member to permanently distort. This has the advantage that at least a portion of the energy from the applied impact is dissipated in localized deformation of the mounting member.
Suitably the shock absorber is irreversibly compressible.
The invention also provides from a third aspect a glazing fitting for attaching a glazing panel to a building, the glazing fitting being securable to the glazing panel and having a hook portion, the glazing fitting being connectable with a mounting comprising a mounting member and being securable to the building, the glazing panel being attachable to the building by connecting the mounting member to the hook portion of the glazing fitting, wherein there is a shock absorber associated with the hook portion of the glazing fitting configured such that when the glazing panel is attached to the building, the glazing panel has an improved impact resistance.
Preferably the hook portion is connectable with the mounting member via the shock absorber.
In a preferred embodiment, the glazing fitting is configured to be securable to the glazing panel via a bore in the glazing panel.
Preferably the glazing panel comprises a sheet of glass.
Preferably the shock absorber is compressible. Suitably the shock absorber is irreversibly compressible.
The invention further provides from a fourth aspect an attachment assembly for use in attaching a glazing panel to a building comprising a mounting member according to the second aspect of the invention and a glazing fitting according to the third aspect of the invention.
Preferably the mounting member is connectable with the glazing fitting such that when the glazing fitting is secured to a glazing panel, the mounting member is substantially perpendicular to the glazing fitting.
The invention yet further provides from a fifth aspect a method of improving the impact resistance of a suspended glazing panel comprising the steps of (a) providing an attachment assembly for securing the glazing panel to an adjacent support, the attachment assembly comprising (i) a mounting having a mounting member and being securable to the adjacent support, and (ii) a glazing fitting for securing to the glazing panel, the glazing fitting having a hook portion, the glazing panel being attachable to the adjacent support by connecting the mounting member to the hook portion of the glazing fitting; (b) securing the glazing fitting to the glazing panel, preferably via a bore therein; (c) securing the mounting to the adjacent support by a securing member that passes through a bore in the support and the securing member passes through a bore in a shock absorber; and (d) connecting the mounting member to the hook portion of the glazing fitting; wherein the shock absorber is configured to allow the attachment assembly to move relative to the support upon the application of an impact to the glazing panel.
Steps (b) and (c) may be interchanged.
Preferably the shock absorber is located in the bore in the support.
Preferably the shock absorber is mounted on a hollow rigid member such that in order to secure the mounting to the support, the securing member passes through the hollow member.
In another embodiment the mounting member is connectable with the glazing fitting such that upon applying an impact to the glazing panel the mounting member can rotate relative to the glass assembly fitting. Preferably the mounting member comprises a stem portion having a bulbous portion and the mounting member is connectable with the glazing fitting via the bulbous portion.
In another embodiment, the shock absorber is associated with the glazing fitting. Preferably the glazing fitting comprises a hook portion and the shock absorber is associated therewith, such that the glazing fitting is connected to the mounting member via the shock absorber.
Preferably the shock absorber is compressible.
In other preferred embodiments of the fifth aspect of the invention, suitably the shock absorber is irreversibly compressible. Preferably the glazing fitting is secured to a bore in the glazing panel. Suitably the glazing panel comprises a sheet of glass. Suitably the glazing panel is a window in a building.
Embodiments of the present invention will now be described by way of example only with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
For this particular mounting 1, the stem portion 3 has a diameter of about 13 mm and a length of about 45 mm. The cylindrical base portion 5 has a height of about 10 mm and a diameter of about 40 mm. The cylindrical base portion and the stem portion are physically connected, having been machined from a single piece of stainless steel. The blind bore 7 has a diameter of about 11 mm and a depth of about 25 mm.
Extending from and integral with the base portion 15 is a cylindrical portion 17 having a substantially horizontal groove 19 therein defining a hook. The groove 19 is sufficiently sized such that the stem portion 3 of the mounting member 2 can engage with the hook. A retaining screw 20 prevents vertical movement of the glazing fitting relative to the mounting member and retains the glazing fitting on the stem portion of the mounting member in the event of glass breakage.
A glazing fitting of the type described with reference to
The glazing panel may be of laminated construction or of insulated construction with a laminated inner component. The glazing panel may be double or triple glazed, in which case the details of the glazing fittings are modified as appropriate for fixing satisfactorily to such a glazing panel.
In use, the mounting 1 is secured to structural element 25 of the building, for example a structural mullion or a supporting truss. The cylindrical base portion 5 of the mounting member 2 may abut the structural element 25, or as is shown in
The glazing fitting is suitably secured to the glazing panel in a manner known in the art. The glazing panel is then suspended from the stem portion 3 of the mounting member by connecting the stem portion to the hook. The retaining screw 20 is then inserted to prevent vertical movement of the glazing element and provides added security in the event of glass breakage.
The mounting member 28 is connected to the glazing fitting 33 via the bulbous portion 31. As in the attachment assembly described with reference to
This type of attachment assembly 41 provides a less rigid connection between the glazing panel and the structural element than the attachment assembly 21 shown in
In both
The mounting 61 further comprises a shock absorber 75. A shock absorber is used when one component is connected to another and provides the connection with the ability to dampen a shock wave and dissipate kinetic energy collected from a high velocity impactor.
The shock absorber 75 comprises three rubber o-rings 77, 79, 81 mounted on a rigid stainless steel tube 83. The rubber o-rings are compressible, such that the shock absorber is able to deform under an applied load. Each rubber o-ring has an outer diameter of about 21 mm and an inner diameter of about 14 mm. The thickness of each o-ring is about 3.5 mm. Each o-ring has a substantially circular profile. The mounting 61 may be secured to a structural element in a building i.e. a truss or mullion by passing the bolt 69 through a bore in the structural element, passing the bolt through the washers and the bore in the stainless steel tube 83 and screwing the bolt into the blind threaded bore 67. The stainless steel tube 83 is slightly longer than the combined thickness of the three rubber o-rings 77, 79, 81. This allows the rubber o-rings 77, 79, 81 to remain uncompressed when the mounting is secured to a structural element in a building because the washers 71 and 73 abut the ends of the stainless steel tube 83.
As shown in
The stem portion 63 is shown having a bulbous portion (as described with reference to
The mounting 61 is shown secured to the structural element 25. The flat face of the base portion 65 is shown adjacent to the washer 73, the washer 73 being adjacent to the structural element 25. In certain circumstances, washer 73 may not be present.
There is a bore 87 in the structural element 25. A washer 71 is positioned on the other side of the structural element, configured to be adjacent to the head of the securing bolt 69. The shock absorber 75 is located in the bore 87 in the structural element 25. The shock absorber 75 comprises three rubber o-rings. The o-rings are mounted on a stainless steel tube 83. The bolt 69 passes through the washer 71, through the stainless steel tube 83, through the washer 73 and is screwed into the blind threaded bore 67 in the mounting member 62, thereby securing the mounting 61 to the structural element 25.
The combined thickness of the three o-rings is slightly less than the length of the stainless steel tube 83 so that the stainless tube 83 is able to butt up against the washers 71, 73. The stainless steel tube allows the fitting to be sufficiently rigid in normal use and prevents the rubber o-rings from being compressed in normal use. The outer diameter of each o-ring is slightly less than the diameter of the bore 87 in the structural element such that the o-rings are rotatable in the bore 87 about the bolt 69. The inner diameter of the o-rings are such that the o-rings are a snug fit on the stainless steel tube 83.
When there is a mechanical impact against the exterior of the glazing panel (in a building the exterior of the glazing panel is that face exposed to the outside of the building), the rubber o-rings are compressible and are able to absorb some of the impact. In comparison, a rigid fitting cannot absorb sufficient impact. When the glazing fitting 33 is attached to a glazing panel via a bore, the bore is the weak point in the glazing panel. Consequently, a rigid attachment assembly between the glazing panel and the structural element of the building provides less impact resistance.
For clarity, an exploded version of the attachment assembly 85 is shown in
The assembly of stainless steel tube 83 and o-rings 77, 79 and 81 is located in the bore 87 of the structural element 25. The bolt 69 is passed through the bore in the washers and the stainless steel tube (assembled in the direction of the arrow 89). The diameter of the bore in the stainless steel tube is sufficiently sized such that the tube is free to rotate about the bolt. The bolt is screwed into the blind bore 67 in the mounting member 62. This secures the mounting to the structural element.
The glazing fitting 33 is connectable (in the direction of the arrow 90) with the mounting member (of the type described with reference to
The mounting may be secured to a support (not shown) by screwing bolt 9 into blind bore 7. A washer 11 may be used when securing the mounting to the support.
In either of
There are four mountings 139, 141, 143 and 145 of the type described with reference to
The pair of mountings 139 and 141 are connected to the structural element 147 via a threaded member 149 that screws into a blind hole 151, 153 in each respective mounting member. Similarly, the pair of mountings 143 and 145 are connected to the structural element 147 via a threaded member 155 that screws into a blind hole 157, 159 in each respective mounting member of each mounting. Washers may be used either side of the structural element.
Located in the bore 161 in the structural element 147 is a shock absorber 162. Located in the bore 163 in the structural element 147 is a shock absorber 164. The shock absorber 162, 164 in each respective bore 161, 163 is three rubber o-rings mounted on a stainless steel tube and is as described with reference to
Each glazing panel 123, 125, 127, 129 may be laminated. Each glazing panel may be an insulated unit i.e. double or triple glazed.
A glazing system consisting of nine glazing panels mounted to a support frame with attachment assemblies was constructed. Each attachment assembly comprised a single or pair of mountings similar to that shown in
The facade was similar to that shown in
The glazing panels in the lower and upper rows each had a glazing fixing secured to the panel via a bore in each corner. Due to the extra height of the glazing panels in the central row, these panels were each supported by eight glazing fittings, four fittings being equally spaced along each ten foot long edge (with glazing fittings in the corner of each glazing panel).
In accordance with ASTM E 1996-08, a 4.1 kg piece of 2×4 inch timber (type D large missile) was fired at the facade at pre-determined location on each glazing panel. The timber was fired at the glazing with a speed of 50 feet per second. This part of the testing schedule subjects the glazing panel to a localised mechanical impact.
This facade passed ASTM E 1996-08 with the type D large missile. The incorporation of the shock absorber in each mounting reduced the rigidity of the connection between the glazing panel and the structural support element. The bulbous portion on the stem portion of each mounting member also allowed the glazing panel to move and absorb energy when the impact from each missile was applied.
The stem portion of each mounting member may permanently distort due to the applied impact, such that energy from the impact is dissipated in localized yielding of the ductile steel material of the mounting member rather than immediate fracture of the brittle glass material. This provides the advantage that the destructive energy associated with the impact may be further dissipated into the glazing system by movement of the glazing panel and distortion of a relatively ductile stainless steel material.
The present invention finds application in providing a glazing facade that is hurricane resistant and passes ASTM E 1996-08, in particular when the glazing facade comprises a glazing panel having a glazing fitting secured thereto via a bore in the glazing panel. A glazing system in accordance with the first aspect of the present invention provides an improved resistance to a localised mechanical impact, such as that required by ASTM E 1996-08 with the type D large missile.
It will be readily apparent to a person skilled in the art that mountings according to the second aspect of the invention and glazing fittings according to the third aspect of the invention may be used with known glazing panels, such as single ply, laminated and insulated units.
The present invention may also find application in providing an improved impact resistance, for example to improve blast resistance i.e. due to explosions. For such explosive resistant applications, the properties of the shock absorber should be chosen so that the glazing panel passes the relevant test. Equally, application could be found in improving general impact resistance to the characteristic requirements defined in standards such as BS 6206 and BS EN356.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
0902627.9 | Feb 2009 | GB | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/GB2010/050260 | 2/17/2010 | WO | 00 | 10/7/2011 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2010/094958 | 8/26/2010 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3052330 | Hammitt et al. | Sep 1962 | A |
3223209 | Skromeda | Dec 1965 | A |
3321880 | Ferrell et al. | May 1967 | A |
3367077 | Johnston | Feb 1968 | A |
3509674 | Birum, Jr. | May 1970 | A |
4448001 | Whitmyer et al. | May 1984 | A |
4608793 | Yost et al. | Sep 1986 | A |
4809475 | Emmer | Mar 1989 | A |
4854098 | Emmer | Aug 1989 | A |
5199236 | Allen | Apr 1993 | A |
5253459 | Parinas et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5309689 | Croissant | May 1994 | A |
5481839 | Lang et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5592795 | Rinehart et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5619834 | Chen | Apr 1997 | A |
5632125 | Osanai | May 1997 | A |
6032423 | Takemura et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6141923 | Habicht et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6401410 | Kenny et al. | Jun 2002 | B2 |
6623203 | Kreyenborg et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6715245 | Lewkowitz | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6804920 | Hogan | Oct 2004 | B2 |
7040062 | Emek | May 2006 | B2 |
7134247 | Ting | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7213375 | Morgan et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7416772 | Rinehart et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7882675 | Lundgren | Feb 2011 | B2 |
20020043034 | Wildenhain et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20030188498 | Lewkowitz | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040068943 | Morgan et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040079038 | Crooker, Jr. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040099778 | Hogan | May 2004 | A1 |
20040234730 | Rinehart et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050060950 | Hauschildt et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20060075702 | Billings | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060144008 | Fouch et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20070193142 | Franceschet | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20080134597 | Rinehart et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080138564 | Rinehart et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
29619318 | Feb 1997 | DE |
19725381 | Jan 1998 | DE |
19844324 | Apr 2000 | DE |
201 22 480 | Dec 2005 | DE |
0192472 | Aug 1986 | EP |
2 738 271 | Mar 1997 | FR |
2738271 | Mar 1997 | FR |
311616 | May 1929 | GB |
H0557137 | Jul 1993 | JP |
07217041 | Aug 1995 | JP |
8-013669 | Jan 1996 | JP |
08013669 | Jan 1996 | JP |
08312043 | Nov 1996 | JP |
8-333831 | Dec 1996 | JP |
08333831 | Dec 1996 | JP |
H0988223 | Mar 1997 | JP |
09144191 | Jun 1997 | JP |
09144436 | Jun 1997 | JP |
09221860 | Aug 1997 | JP |
H09221860 | Aug 1997 | JP |
11193591 | Jul 1999 | JP |
2000170299 | Jun 2000 | JP |
WO03031741 | Apr 2003 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120031022 A1 | Feb 2012 | US |