Structural load-bearing wall

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 12338621
  • Patent Number
    12,338,621
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, August 30, 2022
    3 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, June 24, 2025
    4 months ago
Abstract
A structural wall for a building is provided and includes a frame having opposing sides and a height and at least one structural panel secured to one of the sides of the frame, wherein a length of the at least one structural panel is greater than the height of the frame. An upper track is positioned over an upper end of the frame and an upper end of the at least one structural panel on each of the sides of the frame and a lower track is positioned over a lower end of the frame and a lower end of the at least one structural panel on each of the sides of the frame.
Description
BACKGROUND

The present invention relates generally to structural materials used for constructing buildings, and more specifically, to a structure for constructing walls of residential and commercial buildings.


Residential and commercial buildings are constructed using floor structures, walls and ceiling structures to form different floors of the buildings. The walls are secured together to construct the perimeter of each floor as well as define the internal spaces or rooms on each of the floors. Each floor of a building has a weight that is the sum of the structural materials used to construct that floor. The weight of each floor is supported at a base, called a foundation, which is formed by interconnected walls that are at or below ground level. The foundation walls are typically formed with concrete. Next, the perimeter walls forming the first floor or basement, are supported by and secured to the foundation. Each successive floor is constructed on top of the level or floor below it. Since the foundation supports the entire weight of the building, the size of the foundation is based on the size and number of floors of the building.


In addition to the foundation, each floor of a building may include load-bearing walls, which support the weight of the floor or floors above it. Load-bearing walls are framed walls commonly formed with metal or wood studs. Typically, the vertically oriented studs in the framed walls are spaced apart twelve inches, sixteen inches or twenty-four inches on center but may be spaced at any suitable distance from each other. After the load-bearing walls and non-load bearing walls are constructed to form the wall or walls of a floor or multiple floors of a building, drywall, wood or cementitious panels are attached to either surface of the load-bearing walls, i.e., to the studs forming the walls, to finish the walls. In such conventional framed structures, the frame consisting of the studs, supports the weight of the floor or floors above it and the panels attached to the walls act as a brace to help the framed walls remain flat, i.e., help to prevent the walls from moving or rotating due to the axial load from the floor or floors above it. The conventional walls also may include bracing, such as channel bracing, that extends through openings in the studs and is attached to the studs to help keep the walls flat. Construction materials can be expensive and the cost depends on the supply and demand for the materials. The capacity of these load-bearing walls is limited and stronger load-bearing walls would make buildings stronger and less costly, i.e., more efficient.


Therefore, there is a need for cost effective building materials that have sufficient strength to support the weight of the floors of a building.


SUMMARY

The above-listed need is met or exceeded by the present structural wall that includes building panels secured to a frame where the building panels have a length that is greater than a height of the frame, i.e., studs, so that the building panels support the axial load from a building structure or structures above the wall.


In an embodiment, a structural wall for a building is provided and includes a frame having opposing sides and a height and at least one structural panel secured to one of the sides of the frame, wherein a length of the at least one structural panel is greater than the height of the frame. An upper track is positioned over an upper end of the frame and an upper end of the at least one structural panel on each of the sides of the frame and a lower track is positioned over a lower end of the frame and a lower end of the at least one structural panel on each of the sides of the frame.


In another embodiment, a structural wall for a building is provided and includes a frame having opposing sides and a height and at least one structural panel secured to both sides of the frame, wherein a length of the at least one structural panel is greater than the height of the frame. An upper track is positioned over an upper end of the frame and an upper end of the at least one structural panel on each of the sides of the frame and a lower track is positioned over a lower end of the frame and a lower end of the at least one structural panel on each of the sides of the frame.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 is a front view of an embodiment of the present structural wall;



FIG. 2 is an exploded perspective view of the wall of FIG. 1;



FIG. 3 is a perspective view of another embodiment of the wall.



FIG. 4 is a perspective view of the wall of FIG. 1;



FIG. 5 is a fragmentary cross-section view of the wall taken substantially along line 5-5 in FIG. 4 in the direction generally indicated; and



FIG. 6 is an exploded perspective view of the wall of FIG. 3.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Referring now to FIGS. 1 and 2, the present structural wall generally indicated as 20 is constructed to be a load-bearing wall in which an axial load on the wall is applied primarily to cementitious panels secured to the wall instead of to the frame.


In an embodiment, the structural wall 20 includes a frame 22 having an upper support member 24 and a lower support member 26 that are horizontally oriented, and preferably made of steel. The upper and lower support members 24, 26 each have a U-shape and form a track with a recessed area 28 and 30 defined between opposing sidewalls 32, 34 of the upper and lower support members. In this embodiment, the width (or depth) of the upper and lower support members 24, 26, i.e., the distance between outer surfaces of the sidewalls, is 3.5 inches, but may be any suitable width. Also as stated above, the upper and lower support members 24, 26 are preferably made of steel. It is also contemplated that the upper and lower support members 24, 26 may be made of wood, a composite material or any suitable material or combination of materials. In this embodiment, the upper and lower support members 24, 26 preferably have a length of 8 to 10 feet but may be any suitable length.


As shown, the frame 22 also includes several intermediate support members 36 that are vertically oriented and extend between the upper and lower support members 24, 26. The intermediate support members 36 each have an asymmetric C-shape or U-shape defined by opposing sidewalls 38 and an end wall 40 extending between the sidewalls. In the illustrated embodiment, each of the ends of the intermediate support members 36 are respectively secured to the upper and lower support members 24, 26 by inserting the ends of the intermediate support members respectively in the recessed areas 28, 30 and securing the intermediate support members 36 in place on the upper and lower support members 24, 26 by a friction fit between the sidewalls 32, 34 of the upper and lower support members. In another embodiment, the ends of the intermediate support members 36 are secured to the upper and lower support members 24, 26 by fasteners, such as nails, bolts or screws. Similar to the upper and lower support members 24, 26, the intermediate support members 36 are preferably made of steel, but may be made of wood, a composite material or any suitable material or combination of materials. In this embodiment, the upper support member 24, the lower support member 26 and the intermediate support members 36 are each steel studs, preferably having dimensions of three and one-half inches (3.5 in.) by one and one-half inches (1.5 in.), but may have any suitable dimensions. In another embodiment, the upper support member 24, the lower support member 26 and the intermediate support members 36 are each wood studs, preferably having dimensions of two (2.0) inches by (4.0) four inches, but may have any suitable dimensions. Within the frame, the intermediate support members 36 are preferably spaced apart sixteen (16.0) inches on center defined by a central longitudinal axis of each intermediate support member, but also may be spaced apart 19.2 inches or twenty-four (24.0) inches on center or any suitable distance between the centers of each of the intermediate support members.


As shown in FIG. 2, the structural wall 20 includes a plurality of building panels, and more specifically, a plurality of cementitious panels 42 secured to the frame by fasteners 44, such as nails, bolts or screws. Each cementitious panel 42 is a structural cementitious panel as described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,986,812; 7,445,738; 7,670,520; 7,789,645; and 8,030,377, which are all incorporated herein by reference. It should be appreciated that the panel 42 may be a Portland-based cementitious panel, a magnesium oxide based cementitious panel or any suitable cementitious panel or a panel made of any suitable material or combination of materials. In this embodiment, the cementitious panel 42 is made of a cement-gypsum binder including alkali-resistant fiberglass fibers and preferably each have a length of eight feet, a width of four feet and a thickness of a ½ inch (0.5 inches). It should be appreciated that the cementitious panels 42 may have any suitable length and width. Further, the cementitious panels 42 may have a thickness of ¼ inch (0.25 in), ⅜ inches (0.375 inches), ½ inch (0.5 inch), ⅝ inch (0.625 inch), ¾ inch (0.75 in), 1.0 in or any suitable thickness.


In conventional structural walls, the panels attached to the frame each have a length that is equal to a height of the frame such that the upper and lower surfaces of the panels are substantially flush with the upper and lower surfaces of the frame. In this way, the frame supports the axial load, i.e., weight, of the structure or structures that are constructed above the structural wall or walls. The panels on the conventional structural walls thereby do not support the weight of the above structures but instead, brace the frame to help prevent buckling of the structural wall due to the axial load, and also finish the inside and/or outside surfaces of the frame for aesthetic purposes.


The present structural wall 20 is constructed so that the ends of the cementitious panels 42 extend a designated distance D1 above the upper surface 46 of the frame 22 and a designated distance D2 below the lower surface 48 of the frame 22 as shown in FIG. 2. In other words, the frame 22 is constructed to have a height H defined by the distance between the upper surface and the lower surface of the frame 22, that is less than a height of a conventional frame for a structural wall. In the illustrated embodiment, each panel 42 has a length L that is greater than the height H of the frame 22 such that the panels each extend above the frame by one inch (D1) and below the frame by one inch (D2) as shown in FIGS. 1 and 3. It is also contemplated that the panels 42 may extend above and below the frame 22 by less than one inch or by more than one inch. Further, the distance D1 that the panels 42 extend above the frame 22 and the distance D2 the panels 42 extend below the frame 22 may be the same distance or different distances. For example, the panels 42 may extend above the frame 22 by one inch and below the frame 22 by two inches.


Referring to FIG. 2, the cementitious panels 42 are preferably secured to both sides of the frame 22. In this way, the load applied to the wall 20 is supported by two sets or two layers of the cementitious panels 42. In another embodiment shown in FIG. 5, the wall 21 includes cementitious panels 42 secured to one side of the frame 22. In this embodiment, the cementitious panels 42 may be secured to an inside surface of the frame 22 or to the outside surface of the frame 22.


As shown in FIGS. 2, 4 and 5, an upper track 50 is placed over the upper surfaces 52 of the cementitious panels 42 and the upper support member 24. Similarly, a bottom track 54 is placed over the lower surfaces 56 of the cementitious panels 42 and the lower support member 26. The upper and lower tracks 50, 54 each have sidewalls 58 and an end wall 60 extending between and secured to the sidewalls. In the illustrated embodiment, the upper and lower tracks 50, 54 preferably each have a width of 5.0 inches, i.e., the distance between the outer surfaces of the sidewalls 58. It should be appreciated that the width of the upper and lower tracks 50, 54 may be any suitable width such that the upper and lower tracks 50, 54 respectively cover or cap the upper and lower surfaces 52, 56 of the cementitious panels 42 and the upper and lower support members 24, 26. In this embodiment, the upper and lower tracks 50, 54 are secured in place on the upper and lower ends of the cementitious panels 42 by connectors 44, such as nails or screws, that extend through the upper and lower tracks 50, 54, the cementitious panels 42 and the upper and lower support members 24, 26. In another embodiment, the upper and lower tracks 50, 54 are secured over the upper and lower ends of the cementitious panels 42 by a friction fit where one of the sidewalls 58 extends along an outer surface of the cementitious panels on both sides of the frame 22. The upper and lower tracks 50, 54 may also be secured to the upper and lower ends of the cementitious panels 42 using an adhesive.


As shown in FIGS. 2 and 4, after the upper and lower tracks 50, 54 are placed on and secured over the upper and lower surfaces 52, 56 of the cementitious panels 42 and the upper and lower support members 24, 26, the upper and lower tracks act as a cap and bearing plate for the wall 20. In this way, the axial load from the building structure or structures above the wall 20 is applied to the upper track 50, which distributes the load to the cementitious panels 42 on each side of the frame 22. Thus, the cementitious panels 42 support the axial load and the frame 22 braces the cementitious panels 42 to help keep the panels flat against the frame, i.e., help to avoid twisting, rotating or movement of the panels 42 relative to the frame 22 due to the axial load.


As shown in FIGS. 2 and 6, in an embodiment, an insulating material 62 is inserted between the intermediate support members 36 and between the cementitious panels 42 in the two-sided structural wall 20 (FIG. 2) or adjacent to cementitious panels 42 in the one-sided structural wall 21 (FIGS. 3 and 6) to help control temperature, act as sound proofing and/or to further brace and stabilize the panels. It should be appreciated that an insulating material 62, a semi-rigid material, a rigid material or any suitable material or combination of materials may be placed in the space between the intermediate support members 36 and the cementitious panels 42.


The structural wall in the above embodiments has been tested with different axial loads. In the tests, the double-sided structural wall 20, which has cementitious panels 42 on both sides of the frame 22, supported an axial load of over 25,000 pounds per linear foot of the wall. Tests were also performed on the structural wall 21 having cementitious panels on one side of the frame 22 (one-sided structural wall) as shown in FIGS. 3 and 6.


During testing, a single 2 ft wide by 8 ft long sheet of a ¾ inch thick cementitious panel 42 (structural fiber-cement panel) was secured to two intermediate support members 36 or studs, with one of the intermediate support members 36 being on each side of the cementitious panel 42, where the cementitious panel was secured to the intermediate support members by fasteners positioned at a distance of one foot from the upper end of the panel 42, i.e., in the middle of the panel. The intermediate support members 36 were cut 1¼″ shorter on each end than the cementitious panel 42, and primarily used to brace and keep the cementitious panel straight or flat as described above. An axial load was applied to the top end or top surface of the cementitious panel 42 and adjusted to determine the maximum axial load capacity of the structural wall 21. The test results found that the one-sided structural wall 21, i.e., having cementitious panels on one side of the frame, has an axial load capacity of 38,980 lbs. As such, the axial load capacity of the present one-sided structural wall 21 is twice the axial load capacity of a conventional steel stud wall (per 2 linear feet of wall). Similarly, the axial load capacity of the present two-sided structural wall 20, i.e., having cementitious panels that are two feet wide by eight feet long on both sides of the frame, is over four times the axial load capacity of a conventional steel stud wall. Thus, the enhanced axial load capacity of the present structural wall has significant advantages over conventional structural walls and reduces costs associated with constructing such walls.


While particular embodiments of the present structural wall have been described herein, it will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that changes and modifications may be made thereto without departing from the invention in its broader aspects and as set forth in the following claims.

Claims
  • 1. A structural wall for a building, the wall comprising: a frame having opposing sides and a height, said frame including an upper support member, a lower support member and at least one intermediate support member extending between the upper support member and the lower support member;at least one structural panel secured to one of the sides of the frame, wherein a length of said at least one structural panel is greater than said height of said frame;an upper track positioned over and spaced from said upper support member of said frame, said upper track contacting said upper end of said at least one structural panel; anda lower track positioned over and spaced from said lower support member of said frame, said lower track contacting said lower end of said at least one structural panel.
  • 2. The structural wall of claim 1, wherein said at least one structural panel is a cementitious panel.
  • 3. The structural wall of claim 1, wherein said at least one structural panel is a wood panel.
  • 4. The structural wall of claim 1, wherein a distance between an upper surface of said at least one structural panel and an upper surface of said frame and a distance between a bottom surface of said at least one structural panel and said bottom surface of said frame are each greater than one inch.
  • 5. The structural wall of claim 1, wherein a distance between an upper surface of said at least one structural panel and an upper surface of said frame and a distance between a bottom surface of said at least one structural panel and said bottom surface of said frame are each equal to one inch.
  • 6. The structural wall of claim 1, wherein at least one of said upper track and said lower track has opposing sidewalls and an upper wall extending between said sidewalls to form a U-shape.
  • 7. A structural wall for a building, the wall comprising: a frame having opposing sides and a height, said frame including an upper support member, a lower support member and at least one intermediate support member extending between the upper support member and the lower support member;a plurality of structural panels secured to both sides of the frame, wherein a length of each of said structural panels being greater than said height of said frame;an upper track positioned over and spaced from said upper support member of said frame, said upper track only-contacting said upper ends of said structural panels; anda lower track positioned over and spaced from said lower support member of said frame, said lower track contacting said lower ends of said structural panels.
  • 8. The structural wall of claim 7, wherein at least one of said structural panels is a cementitious panel.
  • 9. The structural wall of claim 7, wherein at least one said structural panels is a wood panel.
  • 10. The structural wall of claim 7, wherein a distance between an upper surface of each of said structural panels and an upper surface of said frame and a distance between a bottom surface of each of said structural panels and said bottom surface of said frame are each greater than one inch.
  • 11. The structural wall of claim 7, wherein a distance between an upper surface of each of said structural panels and an upper surface of said frame and a distance between a bottom surface of each of said structural panels and said bottom surface of said frame are each equal to one inch.
  • 12. The structural wall of claim 7, wherein at least one of said upper track and said lower track has opposing sidewalls and an upper wall extending between said sidewalls to form a U-shape.
  • 13. The structural wall of claim 1, wherein said upper track and said lower track are the same size and shape.
  • 14. The structural wall of claim 7, wherein said upper track and said lower track are the same size and shape.
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

The present non-provisional application claims priority to and the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 63/245,782 filed on Sep. 17, 2021, the entire contents of which is incorporated herein.

US Referenced Citations (142)
Number Name Date Kind
2276244 Fischer et al. Mar 1942 A
2446644 Fischer Aug 1948 A
3115431 Stokes et al. Dec 1963 A
3214311 Gustav et al. Oct 1965 A
3271215 Hoffman Sep 1966 A
3284980 Dinkel Nov 1966 A
3289371 Pearson et al. Dec 1966 A
3309826 Zinn Mar 1967 A
3615979 Davis et al. Oct 1971 A
3640245 Schaefer Feb 1972 A
3895988 Miller Jul 1975 A
3901634 Webb et al. Aug 1975 A
3957556 Wilson et al. May 1976 A
3972972 Yano et al. Aug 1976 A
4050864 Komaki Sep 1977 A
4075805 Bongiovanni Feb 1978 A
4080766 Jastrabek Mar 1978 A
4158082 Belousofsky Jun 1979 A
4194946 Ootani et al. Mar 1980 A
4203788 Clear May 1980 A
4269006 Larrow May 1981 A
4287846 Klein Sep 1981 A
4298413 Teare Nov 1981 A
1344804 Bijen et al. Aug 1982 A
4379729 Cross Apr 1983 A
4420295 Clear et al. Dec 1983 A
4434119 Teare Feb 1984 A
4450022 Galer May 1984 A
4450128 Takeuchi May 1984 A
4482385 Satkowski et al. Nov 1984 A
4504335 Galer Mar 1985 A
RE32037 Clear Nov 1985 E
RE32038 Clear et al. Nov 1985 E
4666029 Buerkner May 1987 A
4778718 Nicholls Oct 1988 A
4793892 Miller et al. Dec 1988 A
4796559 Lohse Jan 1989 A
4816091 Miller Mar 1989 A
4841705 Fuhrer Jun 1989 A
4891071 Bright et al. Jan 1990 A
4948429 Arfaei Aug 1990 A
5132148 Reafler Jul 1992 A
5221386 Ensminger et al. Jun 1993 A
5350554 Miller Sep 1994 A
5515659 Macdonald et al. May 1996 A
5522926 Richard et al. Jun 1996 A
5644877 Wood Jul 1997 A
5677008 Kameya et al. Oct 1997 A
5685903 Stav et al. Nov 1997 A
5718797 Phillips et al. Feb 1998 A
5724783 Mandish Mar 1998 A
5746038 Houk May 1998 A
5783297 Wise et al. Jul 1998 A
5858083 Stav et al. Jan 1999 A
5958131 Asbridge et al. Sep 1999 A
5961900 Wedi Oct 1999 A
5997630 Angelskar et al. Dec 1999 A
6068701 Kohler et al. May 2000 A
6119422 Clear et al. Sep 2000 A
6176920 Murphy et al. Jan 2001 B1
6290770 Moreau et al. Sep 2001 B1
6309457 Guerinet et al. Oct 2001 B1
6358603 Bache Mar 2002 B1
6437027 Somura et al. Aug 2002 B1
6510667 Cottier et al. Jan 2003 B1
6562444 Gleeson et al. May 2003 B1
6620487 Tonyan et al. Sep 2003 B1
6849117 Colombet et al. Feb 2005 B2
6849118 Kerkar et al. Feb 2005 B2
6858074 Anderson et al. Feb 2005 B2
6873920 Dunleavy et al. Mar 2005 B2
6875801 Shendy et al. Apr 2005 B2
6942727 Daczko et al. Sep 2005 B2
6976345 Keshmiri Dec 2005 B2
6986812 Dubey et al. Jan 2006 B2
7166159 Colombet et al. Jan 2007 B2
7182589 Porter Feb 2007 B2
7348061 Girard et al. Mar 2008 B2
7445738 Dubey et al. Nov 2008 B2
7513768 Porter et al. Apr 2009 B2
7513963 Frank et al. Apr 2009 B2
7524386 George et al. Apr 2009 B2
7670520 Dubey Mar 2010 B2
7732032 Dubey Jun 2010 B2
7789645 Dubey et al. Sep 2010 B2
8030377 Dubey et al. Oct 2011 B2
10665541 Adusumilli et al. May 2020 B2
10666294 Brueggen May 2020 B2
20010000738 Mathieu May 2001 A1
20020004559 Hirata et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020121230 Colombet et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020182954 Porter Dec 2002 A1
20030167973 Peev et al. Sep 2003 A1
20040084127 Porter May 2004 A1
20040149174 Farrington et al. Aug 2004 A1
20040198873 Bury et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040211342 Sprouts et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040218462 Stephens Nov 2004 A1
20040231567 Dulzer et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040231916 Englert et al. Nov 2004 A1
20050005821 Colombet et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050061237 Dubey et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050064055 Porter Mar 2005 A1
20050064164 Dubey et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050121131 Hennis et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050139308 Aldea et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050155689 Smolenski Jul 2005 A1
20050219941 Christenson et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050223651 Lange-Kornbak et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050239924 Lettkeman et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050252165 Hubbell et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050274294 Brower et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060048997 Foster et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060105156 Simmonsen et al. May 2006 A1
20060147681 Dubey Jul 2006 A1
20060168906 Tonyan et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060169176 Reddy et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060174572 Tonyan et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060243169 Mak et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060281836 Kerns et al. Dec 2006 A1
20070087198 Dry Apr 2007 A1
20070110838 Porter et al. May 2007 A1
20070110970 Dubey May 2007 A1
20070125042 Hughes et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070125273 Pinto Jun 2007 A1
20070163189 Venegas Jul 2007 A1
20070163470 Chanut et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070175126 Tonyan et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070228612 Durst et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070240621 Qiao Oct 2007 A1
20070256379 Edwards Nov 2007 A1
20080099133 Stivender May 2008 A1
20080101150 George et al. May 2008 A1
20080101151 Frank et al. May 2008 A1
20080110276 Frank et al. May 2008 A1
20090004430 Cummins et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090011212 Dubey et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090239977 Dubey et al. Sep 2009 A1
20110162306 Stanley Jul 2011 A1
20200263418 Klein Aug 2020 A1
20210164222 Pilz Jun 2021 A1
20210189721 Klein Jun 2021 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (9)
Number Date Country
0287918 Oct 1988 EP
0299253 Jan 1989 EP
0934915 Aug 1999 EP
951985 Nov 1949 FR
51115523 Oct 1976 JP
9213645 Aug 1992 WO
9419552 Sep 1994 WO
2005032782 Apr 2005 WO
2009114319 Sep 2009 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (6)
Entry
Non-final Office action mailed May 9, 2011 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/394,506 to Frank et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/394,564 to Tonyan et al., filed Feb. 27, 2009 (unpublished).
Mobasher and Shah; Test Parameters for Evaluating Toughness of Glass-Fiber Reinforced Concrete Panels; ACI Materials Journal, Sep.-Oct. 1989; pp. 448-458.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/394,396 to Tonyan et al., filed Feb. 27, 2009 (unpublished).
Shah, Ludirdja, Daniel and Mobasher; Toughness-Durability of Glass Fiber Reinforced Concrete Systems; ACI Materials Journal Sep.-Oct. 1988; pp. 352-360.
PCT Application No. PCT/US2022/076343: International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Dec. 6, 2022 (12 pages).
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20240068229 A1 Feb 2024 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
63245782 Sep 2021 US