The present invention relates generally to structural materials used for constructing buildings, and more specifically, to a structure for constructing walls of residential and commercial buildings.
Residential and commercial buildings are constructed using floor structures, walls and ceiling structures to form different floors of the buildings. The walls are secured together to construct the perimeter of each floor as well as define the internal spaces or rooms on each of the floors. Each floor of a building has a weight that is the sum of the structural materials used to construct that floor. The weight of each floor is supported at a base, called a foundation, which is formed by interconnected walls that are at or below ground level. The foundation walls are typically formed with concrete. Next, the perimeter walls forming the first floor or basement, are supported by and secured to the foundation. Each successive floor is constructed on top of the level or floor below it. Since the foundation supports the entire weight of the building, the size of the foundation is based on the size and number of floors of the building.
In addition to the foundation, each floor of a building may include load-bearing walls, which support the weight of the floor or floors above it. Load-bearing walls are framed walls commonly formed with metal or wood studs. Typically, the vertically oriented studs in the framed walls are spaced apart twelve inches, sixteen inches or twenty-four inches on center but may be spaced at any suitable distance from each other. After the load-bearing walls and non-load bearing walls are constructed to form the wall or walls of a floor or multiple floors of a building, drywall, wood or cementitious panels are attached to either surface of the load-bearing walls, i.e., to the studs forming the walls, to finish the walls. In such conventional framed structures, the frame consisting of the studs, supports the weight of the floor or floors above it and the panels attached to the walls act as a brace to help the framed walls remain flat, i.e., help to prevent the walls from moving or rotating due to the axial load from the floor or floors above it. The conventional walls also may include bracing, such as channel bracing, that extends through openings in the studs and is attached to the studs to help keep the walls flat. Construction materials can be expensive and the cost depends on the supply and demand for the materials. The capacity of these load-bearing walls is limited and stronger load-bearing walls would make buildings stronger and less costly, i.e., more efficient.
Therefore, there is a need for cost effective building materials that have sufficient strength to support the weight of the floors of a building.
The above-listed need is met or exceeded by the present structural wall that includes building panels secured to a frame where the building panels have a length that is greater than a height of the frame, i.e., studs, so that the building panels support the axial load from a building structure or structures above the wall.
In an embodiment, a structural wall for a building is provided and includes a frame having opposing sides and a height and at least one structural panel secured to one of the sides of the frame, wherein a length of the at least one structural panel is greater than the height of the frame. An upper track is positioned over an upper end of the frame and an upper end of the at least one structural panel on each of the sides of the frame and a lower track is positioned over a lower end of the frame and a lower end of the at least one structural panel on each of the sides of the frame.
In another embodiment, a structural wall for a building is provided and includes a frame having opposing sides and a height and at least one structural panel secured to both sides of the frame, wherein a length of the at least one structural panel is greater than the height of the frame. An upper track is positioned over an upper end of the frame and an upper end of the at least one structural panel on each of the sides of the frame and a lower track is positioned over a lower end of the frame and a lower end of the at least one structural panel on each of the sides of the frame.
Referring now to
In an embodiment, the structural wall 20 includes a frame 22 having an upper support member 24 and a lower support member 26 that are horizontally oriented, and preferably made of steel. The upper and lower support members 24, 26 each have a U-shape and form a track with a recessed area 28 and 30 defined between opposing sidewalls 32, 34 of the upper and lower support members. In this embodiment, the width (or depth) of the upper and lower support members 24, 26, i.e., the distance between outer surfaces of the sidewalls, is 3.5 inches, but may be any suitable width. Also as stated above, the upper and lower support members 24, 26 are preferably made of steel. It is also contemplated that the upper and lower support members 24, 26 may be made of wood, a composite material or any suitable material or combination of materials. In this embodiment, the upper and lower support members 24, 26 preferably have a length of 8 to 10 feet but may be any suitable length.
As shown, the frame 22 also includes several intermediate support members 36 that are vertically oriented and extend between the upper and lower support members 24, 26. The intermediate support members 36 each have an asymmetric C-shape or U-shape defined by opposing sidewalls 38 and an end wall 40 extending between the sidewalls. In the illustrated embodiment, each of the ends of the intermediate support members 36 are respectively secured to the upper and lower support members 24, 26 by inserting the ends of the intermediate support members respectively in the recessed areas 28, 30 and securing the intermediate support members 36 in place on the upper and lower support members 24, 26 by a friction fit between the sidewalls 32, 34 of the upper and lower support members. In another embodiment, the ends of the intermediate support members 36 are secured to the upper and lower support members 24, 26 by fasteners, such as nails, bolts or screws. Similar to the upper and lower support members 24, 26, the intermediate support members 36 are preferably made of steel, but may be made of wood, a composite material or any suitable material or combination of materials. In this embodiment, the upper support member 24, the lower support member 26 and the intermediate support members 36 are each steel studs, preferably having dimensions of three and one-half inches (3.5 in.) by one and one-half inches (1.5 in.), but may have any suitable dimensions. In another embodiment, the upper support member 24, the lower support member 26 and the intermediate support members 36 are each wood studs, preferably having dimensions of two (2.0) inches by (4.0) four inches, but may have any suitable dimensions. Within the frame, the intermediate support members 36 are preferably spaced apart sixteen (16.0) inches on center defined by a central longitudinal axis of each intermediate support member, but also may be spaced apart 19.2 inches or twenty-four (24.0) inches on center or any suitable distance between the centers of each of the intermediate support members.
As shown in
In conventional structural walls, the panels attached to the frame each have a length that is equal to a height of the frame such that the upper and lower surfaces of the panels are substantially flush with the upper and lower surfaces of the frame. In this way, the frame supports the axial load, i.e., weight, of the structure or structures that are constructed above the structural wall or walls. The panels on the conventional structural walls thereby do not support the weight of the above structures but instead, brace the frame to help prevent buckling of the structural wall due to the axial load, and also finish the inside and/or outside surfaces of the frame for aesthetic purposes.
The present structural wall 20 is constructed so that the ends of the cementitious panels 42 extend a designated distance D1 above the upper surface 46 of the frame 22 and a designated distance D2 below the lower surface 48 of the frame 22 as shown in
Referring to
As shown in
As shown in
As shown in
The structural wall in the above embodiments has been tested with different axial loads. In the tests, the double-sided structural wall 20, which has cementitious panels 42 on both sides of the frame 22, supported an axial load of over 25,000 pounds per linear foot of the wall. Tests were also performed on the structural wall 21 having cementitious panels on one side of the frame 22 (one-sided structural wall) as shown in
During testing, a single 2 ft wide by 8 ft long sheet of a ¾ inch thick cementitious panel 42 (structural fiber-cement panel) was secured to two intermediate support members 36 or studs, with one of the intermediate support members 36 being on each side of the cementitious panel 42, where the cementitious panel was secured to the intermediate support members by fasteners positioned at a distance of one foot from the upper end of the panel 42, i.e., in the middle of the panel. The intermediate support members 36 were cut 1¼″ shorter on each end than the cementitious panel 42, and primarily used to brace and keep the cementitious panel straight or flat as described above. An axial load was applied to the top end or top surface of the cementitious panel 42 and adjusted to determine the maximum axial load capacity of the structural wall 21. The test results found that the one-sided structural wall 21, i.e., having cementitious panels on one side of the frame, has an axial load capacity of 38,980 lbs. As such, the axial load capacity of the present one-sided structural wall 21 is twice the axial load capacity of a conventional steel stud wall (per 2 linear feet of wall). Similarly, the axial load capacity of the present two-sided structural wall 20, i.e., having cementitious panels that are two feet wide by eight feet long on both sides of the frame, is over four times the axial load capacity of a conventional steel stud wall. Thus, the enhanced axial load capacity of the present structural wall has significant advantages over conventional structural walls and reduces costs associated with constructing such walls.
While particular embodiments of the present structural wall have been described herein, it will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that changes and modifications may be made thereto without departing from the invention in its broader aspects and as set forth in the following claims.
The present non-provisional application claims priority to and the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 63/245,782 filed on Sep. 17, 2021, the entire contents of which is incorporated herein.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2276244 | Fischer et al. | Mar 1942 | A |
| 2446644 | Fischer | Aug 1948 | A |
| 3115431 | Stokes et al. | Dec 1963 | A |
| 3214311 | Gustav et al. | Oct 1965 | A |
| 3271215 | Hoffman | Sep 1966 | A |
| 3284980 | Dinkel | Nov 1966 | A |
| 3289371 | Pearson et al. | Dec 1966 | A |
| 3309826 | Zinn | Mar 1967 | A |
| 3615979 | Davis et al. | Oct 1971 | A |
| 3640245 | Schaefer | Feb 1972 | A |
| 3895988 | Miller | Jul 1975 | A |
| 3901634 | Webb et al. | Aug 1975 | A |
| 3957556 | Wilson et al. | May 1976 | A |
| 3972972 | Yano et al. | Aug 1976 | A |
| 4050864 | Komaki | Sep 1977 | A |
| 4075805 | Bongiovanni | Feb 1978 | A |
| 4080766 | Jastrabek | Mar 1978 | A |
| 4158082 | Belousofsky | Jun 1979 | A |
| 4194946 | Ootani et al. | Mar 1980 | A |
| 4203788 | Clear | May 1980 | A |
| 4269006 | Larrow | May 1981 | A |
| 4287846 | Klein | Sep 1981 | A |
| 4298413 | Teare | Nov 1981 | A |
| 1344804 | Bijen et al. | Aug 1982 | A |
| 4379729 | Cross | Apr 1983 | A |
| 4420295 | Clear et al. | Dec 1983 | A |
| 4434119 | Teare | Feb 1984 | A |
| 4450022 | Galer | May 1984 | A |
| 4450128 | Takeuchi | May 1984 | A |
| 4482385 | Satkowski et al. | Nov 1984 | A |
| 4504335 | Galer | Mar 1985 | A |
| RE32037 | Clear | Nov 1985 | E |
| RE32038 | Clear et al. | Nov 1985 | E |
| 4666029 | Buerkner | May 1987 | A |
| 4778718 | Nicholls | Oct 1988 | A |
| 4793892 | Miller et al. | Dec 1988 | A |
| 4796559 | Lohse | Jan 1989 | A |
| 4816091 | Miller | Mar 1989 | A |
| 4841705 | Fuhrer | Jun 1989 | A |
| 4891071 | Bright et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
| 4948429 | Arfaei | Aug 1990 | A |
| 5132148 | Reafler | Jul 1992 | A |
| 5221386 | Ensminger et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
| 5350554 | Miller | Sep 1994 | A |
| 5515659 | Macdonald et al. | May 1996 | A |
| 5522926 | Richard et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
| 5644877 | Wood | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5677008 | Kameya et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
| 5685903 | Stav et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
| 5718797 | Phillips et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
| 5724783 | Mandish | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5746038 | Houk | May 1998 | A |
| 5783297 | Wise et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5858083 | Stav et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
| 5958131 | Asbridge et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5961900 | Wedi | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5997630 | Angelskar et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6068701 | Kohler et al. | May 2000 | A |
| 6119422 | Clear et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6176920 | Murphy et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6290770 | Moreau et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6309457 | Guerinet et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6358603 | Bache | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6437027 | Somura et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6510667 | Cottier et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
| 6562444 | Gleeson et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
| 6620487 | Tonyan et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
| 6849117 | Colombet et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
| 6849118 | Kerkar et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
| 6858074 | Anderson et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
| 6873920 | Dunleavy et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
| 6875801 | Shendy et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
| 6942727 | Daczko et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
| 6976345 | Keshmiri | Dec 2005 | B2 |
| 6986812 | Dubey et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
| 7166159 | Colombet et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
| 7182589 | Porter | Feb 2007 | B2 |
| 7348061 | Girard et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
| 7445738 | Dubey et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
| 7513768 | Porter et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
| 7513963 | Frank et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
| 7524386 | George et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
| 7670520 | Dubey | Mar 2010 | B2 |
| 7732032 | Dubey | Jun 2010 | B2 |
| 7789645 | Dubey et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
| 8030377 | Dubey et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
| 10665541 | Adusumilli et al. | May 2020 | B2 |
| 10666294 | Brueggen | May 2020 | B2 |
| 20010000738 | Mathieu | May 2001 | A1 |
| 20020004559 | Hirata et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
| 20020121230 | Colombet et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20020182954 | Porter | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20030167973 | Peev et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20040084127 | Porter | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040149174 | Farrington et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20040198873 | Bury et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040211342 | Sprouts et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040218462 | Stephens | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20040231567 | Dulzer et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20040231916 | Englert et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20050005821 | Colombet et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050061237 | Dubey et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050064055 | Porter | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050064164 | Dubey et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050121131 | Hennis et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050139308 | Aldea et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050155689 | Smolenski | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050219941 | Christenson et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050223651 | Lange-Kornbak et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050239924 | Lettkeman et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050252165 | Hubbell et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20050274294 | Brower et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20060048997 | Foster et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060105156 | Simmonsen et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060147681 | Dubey | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060168906 | Tonyan et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060169176 | Reddy et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060174572 | Tonyan et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060243169 | Mak et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060281836 | Kerns et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20070087198 | Dry | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070110838 | Porter et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070110970 | Dubey | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070125042 | Hughes et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070125273 | Pinto | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070163189 | Venegas | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070163470 | Chanut et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070175126 | Tonyan et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070228612 | Durst et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20070240621 | Qiao | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20070256379 | Edwards | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20080099133 | Stivender | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080101150 | George et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080101151 | Frank et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080110276 | Frank et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20090004430 | Cummins et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090011212 | Dubey et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090239977 | Dubey et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| 20110162306 | Stanley | Jul 2011 | A1 |
| 20200263418 | Klein | Aug 2020 | A1 |
| 20210164222 | Pilz | Jun 2021 | A1 |
| 20210189721 | Klein | Jun 2021 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 0287918 | Oct 1988 | EP |
| 0299253 | Jan 1989 | EP |
| 0934915 | Aug 1999 | EP |
| 951985 | Nov 1949 | FR |
| 51115523 | Oct 1976 | JP |
| 9213645 | Aug 1992 | WO |
| 9419552 | Sep 1994 | WO |
| 2005032782 | Apr 2005 | WO |
| 2009114319 | Sep 2009 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| Non-final Office action mailed May 9, 2011 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/394,506 to Frank et al. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 12/394,564 to Tonyan et al., filed Feb. 27, 2009 (unpublished). |
| Mobasher and Shah; Test Parameters for Evaluating Toughness of Glass-Fiber Reinforced Concrete Panels; ACI Materials Journal, Sep.-Oct. 1989; pp. 448-458. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 12/394,396 to Tonyan et al., filed Feb. 27, 2009 (unpublished). |
| Shah, Ludirdja, Daniel and Mobasher; Toughness-Durability of Glass Fiber Reinforced Concrete Systems; ACI Materials Journal Sep.-Oct. 1988; pp. 352-360. |
| PCT Application No. PCT/US2022/076343: International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Dec. 6, 2022 (12 pages). |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20240068229 A1 | Feb 2024 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 63245782 | Sep 2021 | US |