This invention relates in general to paver brick support systems. Discrete paving elements, such as bricks and stones, are used for outdoor patios and other similar structures. The pavers can provide a durable and aesthetically pleasing surface. The pavers are usually supported on a base layer to insure that the pavers provide a level surface when installed. These paved surfaces are susceptible to the environment and other forces that sometimes cause the supporting base of the pavers to shift or otherwise settle over time. When this happens, the paving elements may also shift, causing the surfaces to become uneven and difficult to traverse. Uneven surfaces can present difficulties for supporting objects in a stable condition.
It would be advantageous if there could be developed an improved structure and method for supporting and installing paving elements.
This invention relates a paving system for paving or flooring, including a top layer of a plurality of paving elements, and an underlayment support layer of polymeric material in the form of panels, the panels being suitable to support the paving elements, the panels being made of a core with a top side and a bottom side. There are three possible configurations, wherein, (1) the top side has a plurality of spaced apart, upwardly oriented projections that define channels suitable for water flow along the top side of the core when the underlayment layer is positioned beneath the layer of paver elements, (2) the bottom side includes a plurality of spaced apart, downwardly oriented projections that define channels suitable for water flow when the underlayment layer is positioned beneath the layer of paver elements, or (3) both the top side and the bottom side include a plurality of projections defining channels suitable for water flow when the underlayment layer is positioned beneath the layer of paver elements.
According to this invention there is also provided a paving system for paving or flooring including a top layer of a plurality of paving elements, and an underlayment support layer of a polymeric material configured into panels, the panels being suitable to support the paving elements, the panels having a generally planar support surface and a recovery characteristic such that a deformation from a concentrated compressive load applied for a short duration returns the support surface to a generally planar condition.
According to this invention there is also provided a paving system for paving or flooring, the paving system including a top layer of a plurality of paving elements, and also including an underlayment support layer of a polymeric material configured into panels, the panels being suitable to support the paving elements, and the panels being porous to the flow of fluids.
According to this invention there is also provided a paving system comprising native soil, a layer of bedding sand, an underlayment support layer of a polymer material, and a layer of paving elements.
According to this invention there is also provided a method of installing a paving system, the method including excavating surface material and prepare a substantially level surface on native soil, applying a layer of bedding sand to the native soil, applying an underlayment support layer of polymer material to the bedding sand, and applying a layer of paving elements.
According to this invention there is also provided a paving system for paving or flooring, the paving system including a top layer of a plurality of paving elements, and an underlayment support layer of a polymeric material configured into panels, the panels being suitable to support the paving elements, and the panels being made of recyclable material.
Various aspects of this invention will become apparent to those skilled in the art from the following detailed description of the preferred embodiment, when read in light of the accompanying drawings.
Referring now to the drawings, there is illustrated in
As shown in
The paving elements 12 are installed above an underlayment support layer 16, which is comprised of a foamed material. More specifically, the underlayment layer 16 shown in
The thickness of the underlayment layer 16 can vary, depending on the particular configuration of the support system 10 for which the underlayment layer is to be used. In one embodiment the thickness is in the range of from about 0.25 inches (6 mm) to about 1.25 inches (32 mm). In another embodiment, the underlayment layer 16 is a thin sheet with a thickness within the range of form about 0.0625 inch (1.6 mm) to about 0.25 inch (6 mm), and in particular about 0.125 inch (6 mm). In yet another embodiment, the underlayment layer is thicker than 1.25 inches (32 mm).
The paving system 10 rests on the underlying ground, referred to as the substrate layer 20. The substrate layer 20 may be dirt, sand, clay, concrete, crushed stone, and the like. The substrate layer 20 may be undisturbed, native soil or may be compacted native soil or may be a graded and/or compacted aggregate base layer. In one embodiment, a layer of leveling material, such as a thin layer of bedding sand (not shown in
As shown in
Optionally, a soil barrier layer 18 can applied between the underlayment layer 16 and the underlying soil or substrate 20. The soil barrier layer 18 may be a geo-textile material such as, for example, a woven or nonwoven fabric that is water permeable or a solid material that is water impervious. The purpose of the geo-textile material is to substantially preclude the mixing of the material above and below the geotextile layer. For example, the layer can substantially preclude the mixing of a layer of bedding sand above the geotextile material with the sub-soil layer beneath the geotextile layer. The desirability of having water flow through the various layers or having the water diverted to other locations may be partially dictated by the type and condition of the substrate layer 20.
As shown in
In one optional method of manufacture, the beads are originally manufactured as tiny solid plastic pellets, which are later processed in a controlled pressure chamber to expand them into larger foam beads having a diameter within the range of from about 2 millimeters to about 5 millimeters. The foam beads are then blown into a closed mold under pressure so they are tightly packed. Finally, steam is used to heat the mold surface so the beads soften and melt together at the interfaces, forming the underlayment support layer 116 as a solid material that is water impervious. Other methods of manufacture can be used, such as mixing the beads with an adhesive or glue material to form a slurry. The slurry is then molded to shape and the adhesive cured.
Referring now to
The sides of adjacent projections 350 cooperate to define channels 356 that form a labyrinth across the panel 350 to provide lateral drainage of water that migrates down from the paver elements. The channels 356 are suitable for water flow along the top side of the panel 316 when the underlayment layer is positioned beneath a layer of paving elements. Even though the channels are often packed with particulate material, such as the bedding sand 17, the channels are still beneficial in providing a path for the flow of water draining through the paving system 10. The water can flow through the sand in the channels.
Optionally, the channels 356 have drain holes 358 spaced apart and extending through the thickness of the panel 316. Projections 370 can be likewise formed on the bottom side 344 of the panel 316, with the projections forming bottom channels 376. The channels 376 are suitable for water flow along the bottom of the panel 316. In one embodiment, the drain holes connect the top channels 356 for fluid communication with the bottom channels 376.
The size of the drainage holes 358, the frequency of the drainage holes 358, the size of the drainage channels 356 on the top side 342 or the channels 376 on the bottom side 344, and the frequency of the channels 356 and 376 provide a design where the channels 356, 376 can be aligned with each other to create a free flowing drainage system. The size and quantity of the top side channels 356, bottom side channels 376, and drain holes 358 can provide dispersion of fluid flow through the paving system sufficient to reduce soil erosion beneath the paving system.
In a specific embodiment, the panels 316 are provided with a mechanism for interconnection with each other. One such mechanism is shown in
The bottom side 370 projections can be the same size as the size of the top side projections 350, or may be a different size. A drainage system, not shown, can be connected to the channels 356 and 376 for the removal of fluids.
The deformation characteristics of the underlayment support layer panel 316 may be of particular interest for some applications. Advantageously, the panel 316 is soft enough that it allows the installer of the paving system 10 to comfortably kneel on the panel 316 in order to work on the installation of the pavers. This requires the panel 316 to be able to deform when under load to distribute the forces to the point that the kneeling installer is comfortable. In one embodiment, the panels, while being suitable to support the paving elements, have a generally planar support surface and a recovery characteristic such that a deformation from a concentrated compressive load applied for a short duration returns the support surface to a generally planar condition. In a specific embodiment, the deformation is at least 5 percent under the concentrated compression load. It is advantageous, however, if the deformation is not so great as to form a permanent indentation or deformation in the underlayment support layer panel 316. In a specific embodiment the deformation is less than or equal to 10 percent under the concentrated compression load.
An underlayment support layer was formed by placing expanded polypropylene beads into a mold under pressure and subjecting the confined beads to a steam application sufficient to soften and melt together the beads at interfaces between the beads. The panel had a thickness of 20.71 mm, and a density of 55 g/l. The panel was subjected to a load to simulate the load of a 235 pound paving system installer. The load selected was applied to the surface over an area of approximately 3.14 square inches, using a tool with a square impact surface 1.414 inches (3.59 cm) on a side. The impact surface is equivalent to a 2 inch diameter area, to represent the load applied by the worker kneeling on the underlayment support layer 16 on one knee, without knee pads. The load applied was 150 pounds (68.1 kg), which is equivalent to 75 psi (pounds per square inch) (517.5 kPa). The load was applied for 10 seconds, and then removed. The deformation of the panel was measured while the load was being applied, immediately after the load was removed, and at a time 2 hours after the load was removed. The results are shown in Table I as follows:
The compression of the panel immediately after the load was removed was 1.74 mm, and the compression after 2 hours was 1.25 mm.
Other sample foams were subjected to the same loading procedure. The panels included a Styrofoam product from a Styrofoam cooler (having an initial thickness of 17.19 mm), a Styrofoam insulation sheet (having an initial thickness of 17.7 mm), and a sample of Arcel (having an initial thickness of 20.28 mm), which is a combination of Styrofoam and EPP (expanded polypropylene). The results of the testing are shown in Table II as follows:
In one embodiment of the paving system, the deformation is less than 7 percent two hours after removal of the compression load from the panel. In another embodiment of the invention the density of the panel is within the range of from about 40 to about 70 g/l. In a specific embodiment, the density of the panel is within the range of from about 50 to about 60 g/l.
Another way to assess the deformation characteristic of the underlayment support layer is to determine the amount of permanent compression imparted to the underlayment support layer when subjected to various compression loads during normal installation. Advantageously, the deformation from typical loads such as the kneeling installer or an installer walking on the underlayment support layer does not impart a permanent defect or deformity in the surface of the underlayment support layer. Depressions in the surface of the underlayment support layer of significant size will cause imperfections in the smoothness of the upper surface of the paving elements 12, or may allow undesirable movement of the paving elements. In one embodiment, the depression in the surface of the underlayment support layer is less than about 2.0 mm when subjected to a compression load of 75 psi 517.5 kPa) applied for 10 seconds over a 2 inch (5 cm) diameter area, when measured 2 hours after removal of the load.
The data above shows that the underlayment support layer panels 16 of Example I result in relatively minimal deformation to the upper surface of the panels during the types of loading normally encountered during installation. In contrast, the alternative materials when tested resulted in deformations that were significant in their magnitude, and would likely result in a defective installation. The surface imperfections would likely result in an unacceptably uneven upper surface for the paving elements 12. Also, such a deformed underlayment support layer would likely result in some of the paving elements 12 being so poorly supported that they would rock or wobble when applied with a normal load of a pedestrian or vehicle.
An advantage of the paving system 10 is that the need for excavating the native soil and replacing the native soil with up to 4 inches (10 cm) of a traditional compacted aggregate replacement base is eliminated. Also, the paving elements can be easily positioned and aligned by sliding on the surface of the underlayment support layer panels, assuming no bedding sand layer is being used. Further, the use of the underlayment support layer panels provides great load spreading over the native soil. It is also to be understood that the underlayment support layer 16, 316 can be placed over traditional aggregate bases of crushed stone and the like. It is to be understood that it may be advantageous to apply a layer of leveling sand on the soil or subgrade prior to applying the underlayment support layer 16.
In some applications of paving systems there is a need for providing the system with the ability to drain rain water downward to the underlying water table rather than having the rain water flow away along the surface of the ground and be carried away by a storm drain system. As shown in
As described above, the underlayment support layer 16, 316 can be made of fused expanded polymer beads. In another embodiment, the underlayment support layer can be made by gluing or fusing expanded polymer beads in an open matrix that includes interstitial spaces. As shown in
Referring now to
Optionally a plurality of spaced apart drain holes 134 are formed through the underlayment layer to provide fluid communication between upper and lower surfaces of the underlayment 116, as illustrated in
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
The support system 10 of
One example of a paver system includes the following layers: compacted subgrade, geotextile material, bedding sand, underlayment support layer panel, and layer of paving elements. The geotextile material is optional, the bedding sand can be either compacted or uncompacted, and the layer of paving elements can optionally be treated with sand or a polymer sand material.
In another example, the paver system includes the following layers: compacted subgrade, geotextile material, an optional leveling sand layer, underlayment support layer panel, bedding sand, layer of paving elements and joint sand. The geotextile material is optional, the bedding sand can be either compacted or uncompacted, and the joint sand can be with or without polymer treatment.
In yet another example, the paver system includes the following layers: subgrade, thin compacted stone sub-base, geotextile material, bedding sand, underlayment support layer panel, and layer of paving elements. The geotextile material is optional, and the layer of paving elements can optionally be treated with sand or a polymer sand material.
In an additional example, the paver system includes the following layers: subgrade, thin compacted stone sub-base, geotextile material, underlayment support layer panel, bedding sand, and layer of paving elements. The geotextile material is optional, and the layer of paving elements can optionally be treated with sand or a polymer sand material.
It is to be understood that in some applications of the paving support system 10, a perimeter restraint or edging system, not shown, can be employed.
As can be seen in
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring again to
The principle and mode of operation of this invention have been explained and illustrated in its preferred embodiment. However, it must be understood that this invention may be practiced otherwise than as specifically explained and illustrated without departing from its spirit or scope.
This application is a Continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 14/196,780, filed Mar. 4, 2014, issued Mar. 3, 2015 as U.S. Pat. No. 8,967,905. U.S. Pat. No. 8,967,905 is a Continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 12/830,902, filed Jul. 6, 2010, issued Mar. 4, 2014 as U.S. Pat. No. 8,662,787. U.S. Pat. No. 8,662,787 claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/223,180, filed Jul. 6, 2009; U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/228,050, filed Jul. 23, 2009; U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/239,206, filed Sep. 2, 2009; and U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/297,236, filed Jan. 21, 2010. U.S. Pat. No. 8,662,787 is a Continuation-In-Part of U.S. application Ser. No. 12/009,835, filed Jan. 22, 2008, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,236,392, issued Aug. 7, 2012. U.S. Pat. No. 8,236,392 claims priority from U.S. Provisional Application 60/881,293, filed Jan. 19, 2007, U.S. Provisional Application 60/927,975, filed May 7, 2007, U.S. Provisional Application 61/000,503, filed Oct. 26, 2007, and U.S. Provisional Application 61/003,731, filed Nov. 20, 2007. The disclosures of these applications are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2515847 | Winkler | Jul 1950 | A |
2746365 | Darneille | May 1956 | A |
3438312 | Becker et al. | Apr 1969 | A |
3577894 | Emerson | May 1971 | A |
3626702 | Monahan | Dec 1971 | A |
3757481 | Skinner | Sep 1973 | A |
3909996 | Ettlinger, Jr. et al. | Oct 1975 | A |
4026083 | Hoyt et al. | May 1977 | A |
4146599 | Lanzetta | Mar 1979 | A |
4287693 | Collette | Sep 1981 | A |
4405665 | Beaussier et al. | Sep 1983 | A |
4445802 | Loov | May 1984 | A |
4629358 | Springston et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
4637942 | Tomarin | Jan 1987 | A |
4658554 | Riley et al. | Apr 1987 | A |
4727697 | Vaux | Mar 1988 | A |
5044821 | Johnsen | Sep 1991 | A |
5073061 | Jones | Dec 1991 | A |
5102260 | Horvath et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5102703 | Colonel et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5292130 | Hooper | Mar 1994 | A |
5342141 | Close | Aug 1994 | A |
5363614 | Faulkner | Nov 1994 | A |
5383314 | Rothberg | Jan 1995 | A |
5460867 | Magnuson et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5514722 | DiGeronimo | May 1996 | A |
5531044 | Wallenius | Jul 1996 | A |
5640801 | Rynberk | Jun 1997 | A |
5888614 | Slocum et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5916034 | Lancia | Jun 1999 | A |
5920915 | Bainbridge et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5957619 | Kinoshita et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
6032300 | Bainbridge et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6033146 | Shaw et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6055676 | Bainbridge et al. | May 2000 | A |
6098209 | Bainbridge et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6301722 | Nickerson et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6357054 | Bainbridge et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6453477 | Bainbridge et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6468629 | Lodder | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6551016 | Guidon | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6616542 | Reddick | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6740387 | Lemieux | May 2004 | B1 |
6796096 | Heath | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6802669 | Ianniello et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6818274 | Buck et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6877932 | Prevost | Apr 2005 | B2 |
7014390 | Morris | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7090430 | Fletcher | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7114298 | Kotler | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7131788 | Ianniello et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7244076 | Whitson | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7244477 | Sawyer et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7273642 | Prevost | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7487622 | Wang | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7516587 | Barlow | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7563052 | Van Reijen | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7587865 | Moller, Jr. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7645501 | Sawyer et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7662468 | Bainbridge | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7722287 | Swank | May 2010 | B2 |
7771814 | Grimble et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7900416 | Yokubison et al. | Mar 2011 | B1 |
D637318 | Sawyer et al. | May 2011 | S |
7955025 | Murphy et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
D645169 | Runkles | Sep 2011 | S |
8109050 | Ovaert | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8221856 | Stroppiana | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8225566 | Prevost et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8236392 | Sawyer et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8341896 | Moller, Jr. et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8353640 | Sawyer | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8662787 | Sawyer et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
20010002497 | Scuero | Jun 2001 | A1 |
20010048849 | Rinninger | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20030020057 | Sciandra | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030223826 | Ianniello | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040069924 | Lemieux et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20050028475 | Barlow et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20060032170 | Vershum et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060081159 | Chapman et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060141231 | Lemieux | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20070166508 | Waterford | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20080219770 | Prevost et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080240860 | Ianniello | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090162579 | McDuff | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090188172 | Ducharme et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090208674 | Murphy et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090232597 | Zwier et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090325720 | Chapman | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100104778 | Wise | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100173116 | Bainbridge | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100239790 | Stricklen et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100279032 | Chereau et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
577328 | Jul 1976 | CH |
671787 | Sep 1989 | CH |
9310473 | Sep 1993 | DE |
20119065 | May 2002 | DE |
1243698 | Sep 2002 | EP |
871775 | May 1979 | FR |
2495453 | Jun 1982 | FR |
2616655 | Dec 1988 | FR |
2762635 | Oct 1998 | FR |
1378494 | Dec 1974 | GB |
54032371 | Mar 1979 | JP |
H03197703 | Aug 1991 | JP |
7-137189 | May 1995 | JP |
8049209 | Feb 1996 | JP |
2000-034823 | Feb 2000 | JP |
2006130288 | May 2006 | JP |
2008008039 | Jan 2008 | JP |
100881167 | Feb 2009 | KR |
20120004054 | Jun 2012 | KR |
1004405 | Feb 1997 | NL |
9856993 | Dec 1998 | WO |
9926784 | Jun 1999 | WO |
9928557 | Jun 1999 | WO |
0209825 | Feb 2002 | WO |
02075053 | Sep 2002 | WO |
03000994 | Jan 2003 | WO |
2004011724 | Feb 2004 | WO |
2006116450 | Nov 2006 | WO |
2007002442 | Jan 2007 | WO |
2008011708 | Jan 2008 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Aero-Spacer Dri-Lex, Hydrofil, FaytexCorp. |
Cork Underlayment—Rolls & Sheets, www.ecobydesign.com/shop/cork/cork—underlayment.html., Jul. 24, 2003. |
Dynamic Cushioning Performance, JSP International, 1998. |
European Examination Report, Application No. EP 10 734 609.0 dated Apr. 9, 2013. |
European Examination Report, Application No. EP 10734609.0 dated Jun. 27, 2014. |
European Office Communication, Application No. EP 10 734 609.0-1601 dated Oct. 16, 2013. |
European Search Report, Application No. 10195632.4, dated Apr. 12, 2012. |
European Search Report, Application No. 10195633.2, dated Apr. 12, 2012. |
PCT International Search Report, Application No. PCT/US2010/041046, dated Aug. 17, 2011. |
Porex Porous Plastics High Performance Materials, Porex Technologies, 1989. |
Product Samples, The engineered plastic foams of JSP International, JSP International, www.jspi.com. |
Quiet Walk, Midwest Padding, www.midwestpadding.com/quietwalk/lintro.html, Jul. 24, 2003. |
Silent Walk, The Silent Partner in Laiminating Flooring, www.sponge-cushion.com/silent2.htm, Jul. 24, 2003. |
Tuplex—General—underlay, flooring underlay, parquet underlay, Tuplex Corp., www.snt-group.net/tuplex/usa/corp.htm., Jul. 24, 2003. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150267357 A1 | Sep 2015 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61223180 | Jul 2009 | US | |
61228050 | Jul 2009 | US | |
61239206 | Sep 2009 | US | |
61297236 | Jan 2010 | US | |
60881293 | Jan 2007 | US | |
60927975 | May 2007 | US | |
61000503 | Oct 2007 | US | |
61003731 | Nov 2007 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14196780 | Mar 2014 | US |
Child | 14636777 | US | |
Parent | 12830902 | Jul 2010 | US |
Child | 14196780 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12009835 | Jan 2008 | US |
Child | 12830902 | US |