When a specially-designed current probe is clamped to a conductive structure, such as a ship's mast, the combination of the current probe and mast can function as an antenna (hereinafter referred to as a mast clamp current probe (MCCP) antenna). Current probes used in MCCP antenna applications must be specifically designed for the platform on which the current probe will be used. In order to properly match the current probe to the structure, the current probe designer needs to know the characteristic impedance of the structure. The “characteristic impedance” is the impedance of the structure that the probe will see. Previously the characteristic impedance of the structure was determined by feeding a brass, scale model of the structure as if it were an antenna.
Disclosed herein is a method for estimating the characteristic impedance of a structure comprising the following steps: providing a current probe comprising a magnetic core having an aperture therein and a primary winding wrapped around the core; measuring, with a calibrated vector network analyzer (VNA), the impedance (Zop) of the current probe while in an open configuration wherein nothing but air occupies the aperture and the current probe is isolated from a ground; measuring, with the VNA, the impedance (Zsh) of the current probe while in a short configuration, wherein the current probe is electrically shorted; measuring, with the VNA, the impedance (Zin) of the current probe while the current probe is mounted to the structure such that the structure extends through the aperture; and calculating an estimated characteristic impedance (Z′mast) of the structure according to the following equation: Z′mast=(Zin−Zsh) (Zop−Zsh)/(Zop−Zin).
Throughout the several views, like elements are referenced using like references. The elements in the figures are not drawn to scale and some dimensions are exaggerated for clarity.
a is an illustration of a current probe and a vector network analyzer in an open configuration.
b is an example of a Smith chart showing open-configuration measurement results.
a is an illustration of a current probe and a vector network analyzer in a short configuration.
b is an example of a Smith chart showing short-configuration measurement results.
a is an illustration of a current probe, a structure and a vector network analyzer in a mounted configuration.
b is an example of a Smith chart showing mounted-configuration measurement results.
a is a cross-sectional view of a one embodiment of a current probe.
b is a perspective view of one embodiment of a current probe.
a-7b are graphic illustrations comparing a traditional transformer to a MCCP antenna.
a is an illustration of a current probe mounted to a pickup truck.
b is an illustration of a Smith chart showing the resulting cascade impedance for the scenario depicted in
c is an illustration of a Smith chart showing the resulting characteristic impedance of the truck tail pipe depicted in
a-10b are illustrations current probes mounted to different structures.
Step 10a of the impedance estimation method 10 calls for providing the current probe 12. As shown in
a shows a horizontal cross-sectional view of a current probe 12 exposing the relationship of the magnetic core 14 and its primary winding 18. The current probe 12 may also comprise a housing 24 and a feed connector 26.
Also shown in the embodiment of the current probe 12 depicted in
a is an illustration of a basic transformer 38. An MCCP antenna can be compared to the basic transformer 38. The transformer 38 comprises a primary winding 18, a secondary winding 40, and a magnetic core 14. The transformer 38 works on Faraday's law of induction principle of sharing common magnetic flux in the magnetic core 14 to transfer the electric energy from one winding to the other.
Faraday's law of induction helps explain the functioning of an MCCP antenna. Faraday's law of induction formalized the interrelationship between electromotive force (EMF) or “voltage” and magnetic flux in the following equation:
where
E=EMF in volts
ΦB=magnetic flux in webers
The MCCP antenna is an electromagnetic energy transducer much like the transformer 38. In both cases, electrical energy fed into the primary winding 18 is magnetically coupled into the magnetic core 14, which in turns couples the energy into the secondary winding 40. In the case of the transformer 38, the secondary winding 40 delivers this energy to a load. But in the case of the MCCP antenna, the conductive structure 11 (i.e. the secondary winding) radiates this energy into space.
RP=Primary winding resistance
XP=Primary leakage reactance
RS=Secondary winding resistance
XS=Secondary leakage reactance
RC=Core loss equivalent resistance
XM=Magnetizing reactance
VP=Primary winding voltage
IP=Primary winding current
VS=Secondary winding voltage
IS=Secondary winding current
EP=Electromotive force of the primary winding
ES=Electromotive force of the secondary winding
IC=Current into RC
IM=Magnetizing current into XM
I0=No load current
In the electrical model depicted in
a shows another example embodiment of the structure 11. In this case, the structure 11 is a pickup truck and the current probe 12 is clamped around the tail pipe 42. The characteristic impedance at different locations on the pickup truck can be determined with method 10.
While the current probe 12 is in the open configuration, S-parameters of the current probe 12 may be measured by the VNA 20, and the open configuration impedance (Zop) of the current probe 12 may be calculated. While the current probe 12 is in the short configuration, S-parameters of the current probe 12 may be measured by the VNA 20, and the short configuration impedance (Zsh) of the current probe 12 may be calculated. While the current probe 12 is in the mounted configuration, S-parameters of the current probe 12 may be measured by the VNA 20, and the input impedance (Zop) of the current probe 12 may be calculated.
From the above description of the impedance estimation method 10, it is manifest that various techniques may be used for implementing the concepts of method 10 without departing from its scope. The described embodiments are to be considered in all respects as illustrative and not restrictive. It should also be understood that method 10 is not limited to the particular embodiments described herein, but is capable of many embodiments without departing from the scope of the claims.
This invention is assigned to the United States Government and is available for licensing for commercial purposes. Licensing and technical inquiries may be directed to the Office of Research and Technical Applications, Space and Naval Warfare Systems Center, Pacific, Code 72120, San Diego, Calif., 92152; voice (619) 553-2778; email T2@spawar.navy.mil. Reference Navy Case Number 100476.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3990003 | Agee et al. | Nov 1976 | A |
5378992 | Murphy | Jan 1995 | A |
5633648 | Fischer | May 1997 | A |
5793214 | Wakamatsu | Aug 1998 | A |
6492956 | Fischer et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6577155 | Stewart et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6861846 | Anderson | Mar 2005 | B2 |
7061254 | Shoulders et al. | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7898484 | Tam | Mar 2011 | B1 |
8111205 | Tam et al. | Feb 2012 | B1 |
8311752 | Tam et al. | Nov 2012 | B1 |
20030025487 | Jian et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030171886 | Hill et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20040217762 | Gifford | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050093554 | Wang et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050194981 | Cole | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20080048677 | Tan et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20100176817 | McLean et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20110231123 | Bacon et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110238383 | Metzger | Sep 2011 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
Marks, Roger B. et al.; Characteristic Impedance Determination Using Propagation Constant Measurement; IEEE Microwave and Guided Wave Letters, vol. 1, No. 6, Jun. 1991. |
Meloling, John H. et al.; A Transmit Mast-Clamp Current Probe for Shipboard HF Communications: IEEE 0/7803-8883-6/05; 2005. |
Southwick, Roger A.; Line Impedance Measuring Instrumentation Utilizing Current Probe Coupling; IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility; Nov. 1971. |