Structured elements and methods of use

Abstract
Structured elements with capabilities for stream flow division and distribution and mitigation of undesired species that exceed those of conventionally available materials are provided. The structured elements provide increased opportunities for surface attraction, retention and coalescence of undesired species in a process stream. The functional contact surfaces of the structured elements can include one or more of the faces of cells, the surfaces of struts connecting cells, the surfaces of nodes connecting struts, and the surfaces of asperities or irregularities caused by channels, flutes, spikes, fibrils or filaments in or on the material surfaces.
Description
BACKGROUND

1. Field of the Invention


The presently disclosed subject matter relates to materials and methods for enhanced treatment of streams to, from and/or within process units.


2. Description of the Related Art


It is known in the art to tailor various streams flowing to, from and/or within process units in industrial facilities in order to to improve the efficiency and economics of the process units contained in the facilities. For example, undesired species in streams can foul, clog, contaminate, poison or degrade unit internals. These undesired species can also have negative effects on the performance of units contiguous to, downstream of, or integrated with such units. Additionally, process unit performance depends on the effective division and distribution of streams entering and within the process unit in order to facilitate optimum contact with internals within the process unit. Improvements in this field of technology are desired.


SUMMARY

The presently disclosed subject matter relates to materials and methods for enhanced treatment of streams to, from and/or within process units.


In certain illustrative embodiments, a method of flow division and distribution and of filtration and mitigation of undesired species from a stream to a unit is provided. The stream can be passed through and contacted with the surfaces of structured elements disposed in the unit, the structured elements being present in an amount sufficient to facilitate flow division and distribution of the stream and to mitigate the undesired species in the stream. The structured elements can have a contact surface with a surface area ranging from 200 to 800,000 square meters per cubic meter of structured elements. The structured elements can also have a filtration capability able to effectively remove particulates of sizes from 100 nanometers to 11 millimeters.


In certain aspects, the structured elements can have a contact surface with a surface area of at least 10,000 square meters per cubic meter of structured elements. The structured elements can also have a contact surface with a surface area of up to 800,000 square meters per cubic meter of structured elements. The structured elements can also have a contact surface with a surface area ranging from 10,000 to 800,000 square meters per cubic meter of structured elements.


In certain aspects, the structured elements can comprise one or more interconnected unit cells, each unit cell having a frame and a plurality of faces. The individual faces can be open, partially open or entirely closed. The frame and plurality of faces of each unit cell can form a three dimensional structure. The three dimensional structure can be a polyhedron, exemplified by the Weaire-Phelan foam-like structure. The polyhedron can be a regular polyhedron or an irregular polyhedron. The three dimensional structure can be a monolith. The monolith can have parallel and non-intersecting channels. The monolith can have irregular, non-intersecting channels. At least 10% of the total area of the faces of the unit cells can be partially or totally obstructed. The unit cells can each have a diameter in the range from 0.5 to 50 millimeters. The structured element can have a plurality of interconnected unit cells comprising a plurality of tortuous flow passageways through the structured element and the stream can be passed through and contacted with the surfaces of the plurality of tortuous flow passageways.


In certain aspects, the structured element can additionally include a plurality of asperities formed on the unit cells comprising the structured element. The asperities can include one or more of channels, flutes, spikes, fibrils and filaments. The contact surface of the structured element can comprise the surfaces of the plurality of tortuous passageways as well as the interconnected unit cells including their frames, their faces and their asperities.


In certain illustrative embodiments, a method of mitigation of undesired species from a stream to a process unit is provided. The stream can be passed through one or more structured elements in the unit, the structured elements being present in an amount sufficient to mitigate the undesired species in the stream. The stream can be contacted with the surfaces of the structured elements to mitigate the undesired species in the stream. The structured elements can have a contact surface with a surface area ranging from 200 to 800,000 square meters per cubic meter of structured elements and a filtration capability able to effectively remove particulates of sizes from 100 nanometers to 11 millimeters. In certain aspects, the structured elements can also have a contact surface with a surface area of at least 10,000 square meters per cubic meter of structured elements. The structured elements can also have a contact surface with a surface area of up to 800,000 square meters per cubic meter of structured elements. The structured elements can also have a contact surface with a surface area ranging from 10,000 to 800,000 square meters per cubic meter of structured elements.


In certain illustrative embodiments, a method of facilitating flow division and distribution of a stream to a process unit is provided. The stream can be passed through structured elements in the unit, the structured elements being present in an amount sufficient to facilitate flow division and distribution of the stream. The stream can be contacted with the structured elements to facilitate flow division and distribution of the stream. The structured elements can have a contact surface with a surface area ranging from 200 to 800,000 square meters per cubic meter of structured elements and a filtration capability able to effectively remove particulates of sizes from 100 nanometers to 11 millimeters. In certain aspects, the structured elements can also have a contact surface with a surface area of at least 10,000 square meters per cubic meter of structured elements. The structured elements can also have a contact surface with a surface area of up to 800,000 square meters per cubic meter of structured elements. The structured elements can also have a contact surface with a surface area ranging from 10,000 to 800,000 square meters per cubic meter of structured elements.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 is a perspective view of a unit cell for a structured element, the unit cell having a dodecahedron shape, in accordance with an illustrative embodiment of the presently disclosed subject matter.



FIG. 2 is a perspective view of a unit cell for a structured element, the unit cell having a dodecahedron shape with a plurality of blocked openings in accordance with an illustrative embodiment of the presently disclosed subject matter.



FIG. 3 is a perspective view of a unit cell for a structured element, the unit cell having a dodecahedron shape with a surface roughened by asperities and irregularities in accordance with an illustrative embodiment of the presently disclosed subject matter.



FIG. 4 is a zoomed-in perspective view of the unit cell of FIG. 3.



FIG. 5 is a perspective view of a unit cell for a structured element, the unit cell having a dodecahedron shape with a strutted or fibrillar surface in accordance with an illustrative embodiment of the presently disclosed subject matter.



FIG. 6 is a perspective view of a structured element comprised of unit cells and having a monolithic shape in accordance with an illustrative embodiment of the presently disclosed subject matter.



FIG. 7 is a perspective view of a structured element comprised of unit cells and having a monolithic shape and a plurality of blocked openings in accordance with an illustrative embodiment of the presently disclosed subject matter.



FIG. 8 is a perspective view of a structured element comprised of unit cells and having a monolithic shape with a roughened surface in accordance with an illustrative embodiment of the presently disclosed subject matter.



FIG. 9 is a perspective view of a structured element comprised of unit cells and having a monolithic shape with a strutted or fibrillar surface in accordance with an illustrative embodiment of the presently disclosed subject matter.



FIG. 10 is a graph comparing filtration capability for conventional materials and the presently disclosed materials in accordance with an illustrative embodiment of the presently disclosed subject matter.



FIGS. 11A-D are images of conventional porous filtration media having various sized openings.



FIGS. 12A-D are images of the presently disclosed structured elements having various sized openings in accordance with illustrative embodiments of the presently disclosed subject matter.



FIG. 13 is a zoomed-in perspective view of the structured element of FIG. 12A.





While the presently disclosed subject matter will be described in connection with the preferred embodiment, it will be understood that it is not intended to limit the presently disclosed subject matter to that embodiment. On the contrary, it is intended to cover all alternatives, modifications, and equivalents, as may be included within the spirit and the scope of the presently disclosed subject matter as defined by the appended claims.


DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The presently disclosed subject matter relates to materials and methods for enhanced treatment of streams to, from and/or within process units. Units typically have internals to tailor streams entering and/or within the unit. Units also have internals to undertake desired unit operations, such as, for example, catalytic reactions and/or mass transfer. Stream treatment functions can include attracting, retaining and/or otherwise mitigating undesired species and/or ensuring effective stream flow division and distribution. The undesired species can include, without limitation, solid particulates, molecular species and entrained fluids.


Units can have streams entering the units as feeds, internal streams (such as recycle streams) within the units and streams exiting the units as products. The handling of these streams can involve a variety of activities including but not limited to (i) mitigating undesired species, (ii) ensuring effective stream flow division and distribution, (iii) performing desired unit operations such as chemical reactions and mass transfer including component separation, and (iv) generating and recovering streams as finished products or as feeds to other units. These activities can be carried out in discrete zones within units or combined as appropriate.


As an example of a simple configuration frequently utilized in industry, many units have a stream treating zone positioned upstream of a stream processing zone, both contained within the same unit. In such a configuration and in the majority of configurations utilized in industry, the roles of the treating zone are to provide to the processing zone a stream whose flow is effectively divided and distributed and/or that is substantially free of undesired species. However, many other configurations of these functionalities and combinations of these functionalities may be designed into units.


In some cases, treating zones can be installed for the sole purpose of dividing and distributing stream flow, or for the sole purpose of mitigating undesired species. Treating zones can be composed of separate layers of materials specifically designed to accomplish these purposes. For example, layers of different forms of media (including different sizes or shapes or structures or compositions or the like) can be installed with each layer targeted at mitigating a specific set of undesired species. Layers can be composed of media whose purposes are to both mitigate undesired species and facilitate stream division and distribution. Layers may be installed in any order and in any location as dictated by the functions to be performed. Units may have only one treating zone or one processing zone, one of each, one of each and multiples of the other, multiples of both or combinations of both. Combination is meant to include zones which have both treating and processing functionalities.


Treating zones can have useful lives primarily dictated by their capacity to attract, retain and/or otherwise mitigate undesired species and/or their ability to effectively divide and distribute the flow of streams passed through them. Treating zones can become blocked or clogged over time and eventually exhaust their capacities to attract, retain, and mitigate undesired species and/or divide and distribute the flow of streams. As these capacities are exhausted, insufficiently-processed streams can progress into downstream zones. Treating zone exhaustion can result in increased pressure drop in the unit itself which can necessitate unit shutdown to rejuvenate (via, for examples, regeneration or partial or complete replacement) the contents of the treating zone and, perhaps, the contents of downstream zones.


A function of processing zones is to process the suitably tailored streams exiting the treating zones. Examples of such processing include (i) molecular conversion via thermal, pressure and/or catalytic means and (ii) component separation via distillation, extraction or the like. Some materials and media used in such processing zones can have a useful “on-oil” life. In process units, for example, where the media in the processing zone are catalysts, the capability of the catalytic media can degrade over time due to catalyst deactivation caused, for examples, by coking or by agglomeration or conversion of catalytic species. A typical response to processing zone catalyst deactivation is to increase unit temperature in order to sustain catalytic performance. Maximum allowed temperature, when reached, will require unit shutdown. Improved treatment zones can facilitate enhanced performance of catalytic processing zones by: [i] prolonging catalyst life via providing stream flows that are more dispersed and distributed, [ii] prolonging catalyst life via providing stream flows containing reduced concentrations of undesired species, and [iii] advantageously allowing the use of more productive catalyst media, i.e., more active media or more long-lasting media.


Various conventional means exist for attracting, retaining and/or otherwise mitigating undesired species in streams passing through treating zones. For example, absorbents or otherwise active materials can be used to render undesired chemical species inert, cause them to be ejected from the unit in an effluent stream or converted into larger particulate matter that can be effectively removed using traditional filtration solutions. Undesired chemical species including reaction products such as iron sulfides and the like can form small particulates. Existing filtration technologies have limitations regarding the particulate sizes they can remove and have limited abilities to deal with undesired chemical species.


Conventional filtration media are also utilized in treating zones within units. However, these media can become clogged and blocked, which causes increases in pressure drop across the filter system as well as the unit itself which may require that the entire unit be taken off-line to remove and replace spent filter media and systems.


Filter system backwashing has also been used to remove filtered particulates. These change-outs and/or cleanings require costly interruptions with accompanying costs due to unit downtime, filter system expenses and maintenance effort. Such change-outs and/or cleanings also incur operating risks associated with unit shutdowns, startups and maintenance.


Porous filtration media have been utilized to attract and retain undesired species found in streams. Conventional porous filtration media are typically composed of ceramics or metals capable of withstanding the severe operating conditions in industrial units. The primary filtration mechanism of such media has been thought to occur within the pores of the media. The ability of such media to effectively mitigate such species has hitherto been correlated with pore size distribution, typically measured by “ppi” or “pores per inch.” Conventional porous filtration media can be commercially manufactured with ppi ranging from about 10 to 100. The ability of such media to attract and retain undesired species depends not only on its ppi but also on the internal surface area of the media. For example, 10 ppi conventional porous media has internal surface area of about 300 square meters per cubic meter of media and has the ability to attract and retain undesired species sized from about 650 to 2000 microns. A 100 ppi conventional porous media has internal surface area of about 2400 square meters per cubic meter of media and has the ability to attract and retain undesired species sized from about 40 to 500 microns. Mitigating undesired species with sizes below 40 microns is not commercially feasible with conventional media. Also, mitigating undesired species ranging in size from, say, 40 to 2000 microns would require utilization of multiple grades of conventional media, each with its own ppi structure and associated internal surface area. Attempts to mitigate species larger than the capable maximum (2000 microns for 10 ppi media and 500 microns for 100 ppi media) results in complete performance debilitation of conventional media.


Porous media is frequently used in treating zones of units to achieve flow division and distribution to downstream processing zones in the same units. The prevailing thinking regarding this subject has been that treating zone flow division and distribution is enhanced as decreased pore size provides increased division and distribution capability. The presently disclosed subject matter demonstrates that the amount and structure of the contact surface area of treating zone media determines the efficacy of stream flow division and distribution as well as undesired species mitigation.


Providing optimum stream treatment systems requires the proper selection, design, fabrication, installation, operation and maintenance of such systems. Key performance parameters to be considered include the robustness of the materials selected to attract, retain and/or otherwise mitigate undesired species and/or the configuration and assembly of such materials so as to provide effective stream division and distribution.


Processing zones can be located within the same unit as the treating zone or in a vessel downstream of the vessel containing the treating zone. Zones within units are utilized to treat and/or process streams. Some zones simultaneously treat and process streams. More typically, streams passing through treating zones are subsequently passed to processing zones.


In certain illustrative embodiments, the presently disclosed subject matter can be employed in zones that simultaneously treat and process streams or in stand-alone treating zones. Specifically, the presently disclosed subject matter can: (i) more fully utilize the capability of the unit internals to attract, retain and/or otherwise mitigate undesired species; (ii) more effectively divide and distribute streams to processing zones within units; (iii) reduce the costs of such treating zone solutions while also allowing for maximized utilization of capabilities of the processing zones of such units; and (iv) result in substantial increases in unit profitability.


In certain illustrative embodiments, the presently disclosed subject matter comprises structured elements 10 with capabilities for stream flow division and distribution and mitigation of undesired species that exceed those of conventionally available materials. When used in units, the structured elements 10 described herein have a number of advantages when compared to prior art materials. For treating zones within units, the advantages include: (i) reducing the depth of the treating zone required, (ii) attracting, retaining and/or otherwise mitigating undesired species unable to be handled by prior art materials and (iii) providing flow division and distribution to processing zones more effectively than prior art materials. For processing zones, the advantages include: (i) having the benefit of cleaner, better divided and/or distributed streams exiting from treating zones, (ii) allowing the utilization of more effective processing zone internals, e.g., more active catalyst types or morphologies, and (iii) creating additional processing zone space to increase loadings of catalysts, absorbents or other internals. For the unit as a whole, the advantages include: (i) reducing the need for unit disruptions, including downtimes, with attendant loss of unit productivity, (ii) reduced operating risks associated with such disruptions and (iii) increased unit reliability and profitability.


Conventional filtration systems in treating zones using porous media have been pore- centric with filtration thought to occur within the pores of the filter media. Recent studies have revealed that the primary filtration mechanism in such media is attraction, retention and/or otherwise mitigation of undesired species on the contact surfaces within the media. In certain illustrative embodiments, the presently disclosed subject matter comprises structured elements 10 having contact surface architecture that is superior to that found in conventional filter media. The contact surface architecture is more amenable to attracting, retaining and/or otherwise mitigating undesired species and/or to facilitating stream flow division and distribution. The contact surface architecture is more amenable to attracting, retaining and/or otherwise mitigating undesired species and/or to facilitating stream flow division and distribution.


In certain illustrative embodiments, the structured elements 10 have multifaceted, three-dimensioal geometry with significantly increased contact surface area relative to conventional material architecture. Structured elements 10 can comprise interconnected unit cells 12, each unit cell 12 having a frame and a plurality of faces. The individual faces can be open, partially open or closed. At least 10% of the total area of the faces of the unit cells can be closed. The structured elements 10 can additionally include a plurality of asperities 14 formed on the unit cells 12. Asperities 14 can include one or more of channels, flutes, spikes, fibrils and filaments. The structured elements 10 can have a plurality of tortuous passageways through the structure via the openings in the faces of the interconnected unit cells 12.


Representative three dimensional architectures of the structured element 10 unit cells 12 can include regular and irregular polyhedra and monoliths.


The contact surface of the structured elements 10 can comprise the surfaces of both their tortuous passageways and their unit cells 12 including the frames, faces and asperities 14 of the unit cells 12. The contact surface of the materials of the presently disclosed subject matter exceeds that of prior materials.


These contact surfaces provide the primary vehicle for mitigating undesired species via attraction, retention, adhesion, absorption, coalescence, agglomeration, capillary action and the like. This results in increased mitigation of undesired species within treating zones which leads directly to improved unit performance.


In certain illustrative embodiments, the structured elements 10 have tortuosity and boundary layer conditions which enhance the ability of the material to attract, retain and/or otherwise mitigate particulate and molecular species. For example, in certain illustrative embodiments, the presently disclosed materials can attract and retain species having sizes as small as 200 nanometers, and in certain illustrative embodiments, as small as 100 nanometers.


In certain illustrative embodiments, the structured elements 10 can be engineered to have structural characteristics beyond the geometric bounds set by the natural formations of foams, gels and extrusions which are used to form conventional porous media. The structured elements 10 can have “active” surface features that improve attraction, retention and/or other mitigation capabilities and enhance flow division and distribution.


For example, in certain illustrative embodiments, the active surface features can include: (i) engineered blockage or partial blockage of unit cell faces; (ii) designed roughness of surfaces plus designed surface asperities or irregularities such as channels, flutes, spikes, fibrils, filaments and the like; (iii) increased tortuous surfaces and surface area of passageways; (iv) regions allowing pooling and settling of liquids; and (v) increased laminar flow and boundary layer zones, wherein van der Waals adhesion forces are magnified.


Active surface features of pooling and settling regions include enhanced capture of small particles which, according to Stokes Law, require more time to pool and settle than larger particles.


Furthermore, it is known that van der Waals adhesion forces become dominant for collections of very small particles (i.e. 250 microns or smaller). Van der Waals adhesion forces are dependent on surface topography, and if there are surface asperities or protuberances which result in greater area of contact between particles or a particle and a wall, van der Waals forces of attraction as well as the tendency for mechanical interlocking increase.


In certain illustrative embodiments, the structured elements 10 have an engineered architecture that elicits enhanced performance beyond existing porous or cellular materials due to improved surface architecture and conditions. The structured elements 10 can have an enlarged contact surface area containing thin film boundary layers within which molecular attraction and retention plus Van der Waals adhesion forces are magnified.


In certain illustrative embodiments, surface features of the structured elements 10 can include surfaces that are wholly or partially composed of, or coated with, materials that enhance mitigation of undesired species. An illustrative example is wash coating with a material which helps attract and retain metal molecular species such as arsenic and vanadium, both of which are powerful catalyst deactivators or poisons.


The structured elements 10 provide increased opportunities for surface attraction, retention and coalescence of undesired species. In certain illustrative embodiments, the functional contact surfaces of the structured elements 10 can include one or more of: (i) the faces of cells, (ii) the surfaces of struts connecting cells, (iii) the surfaces of nodes connecting struts, and (iv) the surfaces of asperities 14 or irregularities caused by channels, flutes, spikes, fibrils or filaments in or on the surfaces of all the above. The functional contact surfaces of the structured elements 10 can be manufactured or modified to enhance coalescence, chemical reaction, agglomeration of atoms into larger species, extraction, adsorption, and the like in the process units.


In certain illustrative embodiments, the structured elements 10 can facilitate flow division and distribution in units. It has been learned that flow division and distribution enhancement can be attributed not only to tortuous mixing, but also, in certain illustrative embodiments, to the development of thin films on the surfaces of the structured elements 10. These films and surfaces can provide a vehicle for division and flow distribution. Thus, the focus of flow division and distribution performance is shifted from pore size and pore volume to contact surfaces, surface area and, importantly, surface asperities 14 and irregularities.


In certain illustrative embodiments, the structured elements 10 can have appropriately engineered architectures that attract, retain and/or otherwise mitigate a broader range of undesired species than conventional materials. This provides the important economic benefit of decreasing the number of layers of media “grades” (and the space required to contain them) in a unit's treating zone(s) and freeing valuable space for added unit internals (such as catalyst) in the unit's processing zone(s). In certain illustrative embodiments, the structured elements 10 comprise materials having an internal void fraction of 60% or greater. In certain illustrative embodiments, the structured elements 10 can begin with cells that are 0.5 to 50 millimeters in size.


In certain illustrative embodiments, the structured elements 10 can comprise polyhedral shaped materials. The polyhedral shapes can include, for example, tetrahedra, cubes, octahedra, dodacahedra and isosahedra. The polyhedral shapes can be formed from a plurality of interconnected unit cells 12 comprising polygonal shaped materials that are positioned together to form a combined structure. Further, the structured elements 10 can comprise reticulated ceramics as well as any other cellular ceramics including monolithic structures.


Various illustrative embodiments of the structured element 10 of the unit cells 12 are shown in FIGS. 1-5. FIG. 1 shows a standard dodecahedron-shaped unit cell 12, which can be for example, the building block for a reticulated ceramic. FIG. 2 shows the dodecahedron-shaped unit cell 12 having approximately 50% blocked openings. FIG. 3 shows the dodecahedron-shaped unit cell 12 having a roughened surface. FIG. 4 shows a close up view of the dodecahedron-shaped unit cell 12 of FIG. 3, to further illustrate the roughened surface. FIG. 5 shows the dodecahedron-shaped unit cell 12 having a fibrillar surface. FIGS. 12A-12D are representative views of the structured elements 10 composed of a plurality of unit cells 12 wherein the unit cells 12 have different sizes (measured in pores per inch). FIG. 12E, a zoomed portion of FIG. 12A, illustrates the surface features of the structured elements 10 that produce the significant increase in contact surface area relative to conventional materials, in certain illustrative embodiments. FIG. 6 shows a structured element 10 having a standard monolithic structure. FIG. 7 shows the monolithic structure having approximately 50% blocked openings. FIG. 8 shows the monolithic structure having a roughened surface. FIG. 9 shows the monolithic structure having a spiked or fibrillar surface.


In certain illustrative embodiments, the structured elements 10 comprise materials having a geometric contact surface area in the range from 200 to 800,000 square meters per cubic meter of said structured elements 10. In certain aspects, the structured elements 10 can have a contact surface with a surface area of at least 10,000 square meters per cubic meter of structured elements 10. The structured elements 10 can also have a contact surface with a surface area of up to 800,000 square meters per cubic meter of structured elements 10. The structured elements 10 can also have a contact surface with a surface area ranging from 10,000 to 800,000 square meters per cubic meter of structured elements 10.


In certain illustrative embodiments, the range of contact surface area of the structured elements 10 of the presently disclosed subject matter is significantly larger than the contact surface area range of prior art materials. Moreover, specific grades of structured elements 10 have a significantly broader range of ability to attract and retain undesired species. As examples, structured elements 10 corresponding to 10 ppi conventional media are capable of attracting and retaining species of size ranging from 20 to 2000 microns and structured elements 10 corresponding to 100 ppi are capable of attracting and retaining species of size ranging from 0.1 to 500 microns.


A graphical comparison of filtration capability for conventional materials and the presently disclosed materials is shown in FIG. 10. The graph shows the filtration ranges for both prior art materials (as described in, e.g., Paragraph 28 herein) and the presently disclosed materials with particle sizes shown in microns on the x axis. The Standard Structure A line corresponds to the filtration capability of conventional prior art 10 ppm media. This media is capable of filtering particulate matter from 650 to 2000 microns in size. The Standard Structure B line corresponds to the filtration capability of conventional prior art 100 ppm media. This media is capable of filtering particulate matter from 40 to 500 microns in size. These two represent the upper and lower ppi limits of conventional materials that can be commercially manufactured and used. As shown in FIG. 10, there is a gap between the upper end of the B line (500 microns) and the lower end of the A line (650 microns). If a specific process application needed to filter particulates across the entire 40 to 2000 micron range, both the A and B structures would be required plus another structure (of approximately 50 ppi) to bridge the 500 to 650 micron gap. This would mean three different grades of media in three different layers in the unit must be utilized.


By comparison, the Structured elements 10 line of FIG. 10 shows the capability of only one grade of the presently disclosed materials, in certain illustrative embodiments. This grade, when used alone, can filter particulates ranging in size from 20 to 2000 microns, and thus corresponds with the entire range of both the Standard Structure A line and the Standard Structure B line, and beyond. Thus, as explained previously herein, the Structured elements 10 can filter particulates that are both smaller and larger than feasible with prior art media.


For example, the Structured elements 10 can filter particulates as small as 0.1 microns (100 nanometers) and as large as 11 millimeters, in certain illustrative embodiments.



FIGS. 11A-11D and 12A-12D are comparative views of conventional materials and the presently disclosed structured elements 10 according to certain illustrative embodiments. The conventional materials of FIGS. 11A-11D have sizes of approximately ten (10) (FIG. 11A), thirty (30) (FIG. 11B), fifty (50) (FIG. 11C) and eighty (80) (FIG. 11D) ppi, respectively. The structured elements 10 of FIGS. 12A-12D are different and distinguishable in structure from those of FIGS. 11A-11D due to the presence of face blockage and surface roughness and asperities 14 (as illustrated in FIG. 12E which is a zoomed portion of 12A) which advantageously provide a significant and measurable increase in contact surface area relative to conventional materials. According to certain illustrative embodiments, and as shown in FIG. 13, the unit cells 12 that make up the structured elements 10 can comprise a random mix of individual unit cells 12 having, for example, various types of asperities 14 and/or one or more blocked openings.


In certain illustrative embodiments, each of the structured elements 10 in the images in FIGS. 12A - 12D can contain a variety of blockages, surface roughness, and asperities 14. Geometrical models have been produced to estimate the relative increase of surface area that these different combinations are able to generate. For example, in certain illustrative embodiments, the structured element 10 in FIG. 12A could have a surface area as low as 260 square meter per cubic meter and as high as 131,700 square meter per cubic meter. In certain illustrative embodiments, the structured element 10 in FIG. 12B could have a surface area as low as 625 square meter per cubic meter and as high as 305,000 square meter per cubic meter. In certain illustrative embodiments, the structured element 10 in FIG. 12C could have a surface area as low as 1223 square meter per cubic meter and as high as 556,500 square meter per cubic meter. In certain illustrative embodiments, the structured element 10 in FIG. 12D could have a surface area as low as 1697 square meter per cubic meter and as high as 834,600 square meter per cubic meter. More in depth modeling has been performed to demonstrate surface areas exceeding 1,000,000 square meter per cubic meter provided sufficient structures and the preferred combination of blockages, roughness, and asperities 14. The structure in FIG. 12A could provide enough variability in surface area to perform the same function as FIGS. 11A - 11D, vastly shrinking filtration system size and the number of layers required for proper function. Similar comparisons can be made about FIGS. 12B, C, and D, but it can also be said surface areas which could not be physically achieved in FIGS. 11A - 11D are surpassed by more than 2 orders of magnitude in the structures represented in FIGS. 12A - 12D, in certain illustrative embodiments.


Various methods of utilizing the structured elements 10 in or in connection with a unit are disclosed herein. For example, in certain illustrative embodiments, a method of mitigating undesired species within and providing effective flow division and distribution of one or more fluid streams is provided. The mitigation can involve retention, capture, trapping, isolation, neutralization, removal, agglomeration, coalescence, transformation or otherwise rendering said undesired species impotent. The undesired species can include small particulates, entrained matter, undesired chemicals, extraneous contaminants, and the like. A treating zone of the structured elements 10 can be provided whereby the structured elements 10: (i) have sufficient voidage, surface area and passageway tortuosity; (ii) have a plurality of surfaces within said elements sufficient to facilitate both mitigation of the undesired species and effective flow division and distribution; and (iii) have a plurality of tortuous flow passageways to facilitate both mitigation of undesired species on the surfaces of the structured elements 10 and unimpeded passage of the streams thru the treating zone. The effluent from the treating zone can be fed to a processing zone located downstream in the same unit. Asperities 14 and irregularities such as spikes and fibrils can be created on the surfaces of the structured elements 10. The faces of the structured elements 10 can also be blocked or partially blocked. In another aspect, a method of removing contaminants from a contaminated feed stream is provided. The contaminated feed stream can be passed through a layer of structured elements 10, the layer of structured elements 10 being in an amount sufficient to substantially filter the contaminant from the feed stream. The contaminated feed stream can be contacted with the surfaces of the structured elements 10 to remove the contaminants from the contaminated feed stream.


In certain illustrative embodiments, the stream that is treated with the structured elements 10 is an industrial process stream and the unit is an industrial process unit. For example, and without limitation, the industrial process stream can be a hydrocarbon or an inorganic stream, and the industrial process unit can be a hydrotreater, a still or an extractor.


It is to be understood that the presently disclosed subject matter is not to be limited to the exact details of construction, operation, exact materials, or embodiments shown and described, as obvious modifications and equivalents will be apparent to one skilled in the art. Accordingly, the presently disclosed subject matter is therefore to be limited only by the scope of the appended claims.

Claims
  • 1. A method of filtration of a fluid stream containing filterable solids in a process unit, the method comprising: passing the fluid stream through a plurality of structured elements in the process unit, wherein each structured element comprises one or more interconnected unit cells, each unit cell having a frame with a three-dimensional polyhedron structure and a plurality of faces, and wherein the faces include a combination of open, partially open and closed faces, and wherein the frame, the partially open faces, and the closed faces each have a plurality of differently-shaped asperities disposed on the surfaces thereof; andcontacting the fluid stream with the contact surface, wherein the contact surface filters from the fluid stream filterable solids having a size in the range from 100 nanometers to 11 millimeters.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, wherein the fluid stream is an industrial process stream and the process unit is an industrial process unit.
  • 3. The method of claim 1, wherein the structured elements comprise a plurality of differently-shaped unit cells.
  • 4. The method of claim 1, wherein the asperities comprise one or more of fibrils and filaments.
RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application claims the benefit, and priority benefit, of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 62/273,590, filed Dec. 31, 2015, and U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 62/294,718, filed Feb. 12, 2016, the contents of each of which are incorporated by reference herein in their entirety.

US Referenced Citations (264)
Number Name Date Kind
436414 Graham Sep 1890 A
578548 Deruelle Mar 1897 A
598351 Staub Feb 1898 A
1947777 Huff et al. Feb 1934 A
2000078 Haseltine May 1935 A
2006078 Pyzel Jun 1935 A
2055162 Friedrich Sep 1936 A
2153599 Thomas Apr 1939 A
2183657 Page Dec 1939 A
2212932 Fairlie Aug 1940 A
2408164 Foster Sep 1946 A
2439021 Quigg Apr 1948 A
2571958 Slaughter et al. Oct 1951 A
2739118 Comte Mar 1956 A
2793017 Lake May 1957 A
2893852 Montgomery Jul 1959 A
2919981 Calva Jan 1960 A
2985589 Broughton et al. May 1961 A
3090094 Schwartzwalder et al. May 1963 A
3100688 Dess Aug 1963 A
3151187 Comte Sep 1964 A
3167600 Worman Jan 1965 A
3169839 Calva Feb 1965 A
3171820 Volz Mar 1965 A
3175918 McGahan Mar 1965 A
3208833 Carson Sep 1965 A
3214247 Broughton Oct 1965 A
3232589 Eckert Feb 1966 A
3361839 Lester Jan 1968 A
3410057 Lerner Nov 1968 A
3423185 Ballard et al. Jan 1969 A
3431082 Sellin Mar 1969 A
3487112 Paulik et al. Dec 1969 A
3489529 Dudych et al. Jan 1970 A
3498755 Borre Mar 1970 A
3506248 Starbuck et al. Apr 1970 A
3544457 Fredrick et al. Dec 1970 A
3562800 Carlson Feb 1971 A
3563887 Sommers et al. Feb 1971 A
3635943 Stewart Jan 1972 A
3657864 Davis, Jr. et al. Apr 1972 A
3685971 Carson Aug 1972 A
3706812 Derosset et al. Dec 1972 A
3717670 Schultz Feb 1973 A
3732078 Kassarjian May 1973 A
3787188 Lyon Jan 1974 A
3787189 Lovell et al. Jan 1974 A
3789989 Carson Feb 1974 A
3796657 Protorius et al. Mar 1974 A
3844936 Newson Oct 1974 A
3888633 Grosboll et al. Jun 1975 A
3892583 Winter et al. Jul 1975 A
3898180 Crooks et al. Aug 1975 A
3947347 Mitchell Mar 1976 A
3960508 Bessant et al. Jun 1976 A
3962078 Hirs Jun 1976 A
3992282 Grosboll et al. Nov 1976 A
4029482 Postma et al. Jun 1977 A
RE29314 Carlson et al. Jul 1977 E
RE29315 Carlson et al. Jul 1977 E
4033727 Vautrain Jul 1977 A
4086307 Glaspie Apr 1978 A
4149862 Sewell, Sr. Apr 1979 A
4188197 Amberkar et al. Feb 1980 A
4197205 Hirs Apr 1980 A
4203935 Hackenjos May 1980 A
4251239 Clyde et al. Feb 1981 A
4285910 Kennedy, Jr. Aug 1981 A
4329318 Le Grouyellec et al. May 1982 A
4342643 Kyan Aug 1982 A
4374020 Trevino et al. Feb 1983 A
4378292 Haase Mar 1983 A
4380529 Gupta Apr 1983 A
4402832 Gerhold Sep 1983 A
4443559 Smith, Jr. Apr 1984 A
4478721 Gerhold Oct 1984 A
4483771 Koch Nov 1984 A
4487727 Ballato, Jr. Dec 1984 A
4504396 Vardi et al. Mar 1985 A
4511519 Hsia Apr 1985 A
4568595 Morris Feb 1986 A
4569821 Duperray Feb 1986 A
4579647 Smith Apr 1986 A
4615796 Kramer Oct 1986 A
4642089 Zupkas et al. Feb 1987 A
4642397 Zinnen et al. Feb 1987 A
4668442 Lang May 1987 A
4669890 Peyrot Jun 1987 A
4681674 Graven et al. Jul 1987 A
4691031 Suciu et al. Sep 1987 A
4708852 Helbling, Jr. et al. Nov 1987 A
4711930 Hoelderick et al. Dec 1987 A
4719090 Masaki Jan 1988 A
4726825 Natale Feb 1988 A
4775460 Reno Oct 1988 A
4788040 Campagnolo et al. Nov 1988 A
4798676 Matkovich Jan 1989 A
4810685 Twigg et al. Mar 1989 A
4830736 Hung et al. May 1989 A
4849569 Smith, Jr. Jul 1989 A
4859642 Hoelderick et al. Aug 1989 A
4863712 Twigg et al. Sep 1989 A
4880541 Chiron et al. Nov 1989 A
4938422 Koves Jul 1990 A
4950834 Arganbright et al. Aug 1990 A
4954251 Barnes et al. Sep 1990 A
4968651 Crabtree Nov 1990 A
4971771 Stahl Nov 1990 A
4982022 Smith, Jr. Jan 1991 A
4985211 Akihama et al. Jan 1991 A
5013426 Dang Vu et al. May 1991 A
5017542 Matan et al. May 1991 A
5043506 Crossland Aug 1991 A
5055627 Smith, Jr. et al. Oct 1991 A
5104546 Filson et al. Apr 1992 A
5113015 Palmer et al. May 1992 A
5118873 Smith, Jr. Jun 1992 A
5122276 Loikits Jun 1992 A
5143700 Anguil Sep 1992 A
5177961 Whittenberger Jan 1993 A
5189001 Johnson Feb 1993 A
5202097 Poussin Apr 1993 A
5217603 Inoue et al. Jun 1993 A
5235102 Palmer et al. Aug 1993 A
5243115 Smith, Jr. et al. Sep 1993 A
5248836 Bakshi et al. Sep 1993 A
5298226 Nowobilski Mar 1994 A
5304423 Niknafs et al. Apr 1994 A
5326512 Stillwagon et al. Jul 1994 A
5336656 Campbell Aug 1994 A
5368722 Bartholdy Nov 1994 A
5384300 Feeley et al. Jan 1995 A
5384302 Gerdes et al. Jan 1995 A
5399535 Whitman Mar 1995 A
5409375 Butcher Apr 1995 A
5446223 Smith, Jr. Aug 1995 A
5454947 Olapinski et al. Oct 1995 A
5476978 Smith, Jr. et al. Dec 1995 A
5510056 Jacobs et al. Apr 1996 A
5512530 Gerdes et al. Apr 1996 A
5523503 Funk et al. Jun 1996 A
5538544 Nowobilski et al. Jul 1996 A
5558029 Peake Sep 1996 A
5599363 Percy Feb 1997 A
5624547 Sudhakar et al. Apr 1997 A
D381394 Lex, Jr. et al. Jul 1997 S
5660715 Trimble et al. Aug 1997 A
5670095 Southam Sep 1997 A
5766290 Zievers et al. Jun 1998 A
5767470 Cha Jun 1998 A
5779993 Gentry Jul 1998 A
5785851 Morris et al. Jul 1998 A
5799596 Peake Sep 1998 A
5817594 McNamara et al. Oct 1998 A
5853579 Rummier et al. Dec 1998 A
5853582 Grangeon et al. Dec 1998 A
5866736 Chen Feb 1999 A
5873998 Grangeon et al. Feb 1999 A
5895572 Joulin et al. Apr 1999 A
5901575 Sunder May 1999 A
5910241 McNamara et al. Jun 1999 A
5943969 Peake Aug 1999 A
5972214 Callebert et al. Oct 1999 A
6024871 Harter et al. Feb 2000 A
6033629 Friederick et al. Mar 2000 A
6036743 Butcher et al. Mar 2000 A
6096278 Gary Aug 2000 A
6117812 Gao et al. Sep 2000 A
6156197 Dessapt et al. Dec 2000 A
6242661 Podrebarac et al. Jun 2001 B1
6258900 Glover et al. Jul 2001 B1
6262131 Arcuri et al. Jul 2001 B1
6284022 Sachweh et al. Sep 2001 B1
6291603 Glover et al. Sep 2001 B1
6315972 Mehdizadeh et al. Nov 2001 B1
6352579 Hirata et al. Mar 2002 B1
6402959 Dessapt et al. Jun 2002 B1
6454948 Ferschneider et al. Sep 2002 B2
6521562 Clem et al. Feb 2003 B1
6583329 Podrebarac Jun 2003 B1
6630078 Kourtakis et al. Oct 2003 B2
6713772 Goodman et al. Mar 2004 B2
6797175 Hotier Sep 2004 B2
6835224 Cheng Dec 2004 B2
6890878 Moore May 2005 B2
7014175 Honnell Mar 2006 B2
7125490 Clendenning et al. Oct 2006 B2
7255917 Rochlin et al. Aug 2007 B2
7265189 Glover Sep 2007 B2
7314551 Frey et al. Jan 2008 B2
7390403 Siwak Jun 2008 B2
7393510 Glover Jul 2008 B2
7427385 Scheirer et al. Sep 2008 B2
7527671 Stuecker et al. May 2009 B1
7722832 Glover et al. May 2010 B2
7741502 Lecocq et al. Jun 2010 B2
8062521 Glover Nov 2011 B2
8282890 Niknafa et al. Oct 2012 B2
8293195 Blanchard Oct 2012 B2
8313709 Glover Nov 2012 B2
8500852 Galbraith Aug 2013 B2
8524164 Glover Sep 2013 B2
8550157 O'Malley Oct 2013 B2
8663474 Niazi Mar 2014 B2
9056268 Jones et al. Jun 2015 B2
9101863 Glover Aug 2015 B2
9205392 Byl et al. Dec 2015 B2
9352292 Solantie et al. May 2016 B2
9732774 Glover Aug 2017 B1
10054140 Glover et al. Aug 2018 B2
10161428 Glover et al. Dec 2018 B2
10421067 Glover Sep 2019 B2
10421068 Glover Sep 2019 B2
10449531 Glover Oct 2019 B2
10500581 Glover Dec 2019 B1
10525456 Glover Jan 2020 B2
10543483 Glover Jan 2020 B2
10655654 Glover et al. May 2020 B2
10662986 Glover May 2020 B2
20010015336 Glover Aug 2001 A1
20020146358 Smith et al. Oct 2002 A1
20030125594 Moore Jul 2003 A1
20040031729 Meier et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040084352 Meier et al. May 2004 A1
20040192862 Glover et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040225085 Glover et al. Nov 2004 A1
20050240038 Gobbel et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050255014 Glover et al. Nov 2005 A1
20060009648 Gobbel et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060108274 Frey et al. May 2006 A1
20060196826 Glover Jul 2006 A1
20060251555 Warner et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060275185 Tonkovich et al. Dec 2006 A1
20070158277 Bachand et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070265357 Iversen et al. Nov 2007 A1
20080044316 Glover Feb 2008 A1
20080296216 Glover Dec 2008 A1
20090044702 Adamek et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090146339 Malone et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090211441 Reyes et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090283479 Warner et al. Nov 2009 A1
20100209315 Niknafs Aug 2010 A1
20100243519 Glover et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100243520 Glover et al. Sep 2010 A1
20110200478 Billiet Aug 2011 A1
20120211438 Glover Aug 2012 A1
20120237434 Blanchard et al. Sep 2012 A1
20130306562 Stifter et al. Nov 2013 A1
20150053627 Silin et al. Feb 2015 A1
20150129512 Thiyagarajan May 2015 A1
20160136603 Parihar et al. May 2016 A1
20170189834 Glover Jul 2017 A1
20170234339 Glover Aug 2017 A1
20180008952 Glover Jan 2018 A1
20180023598 Glover Jan 2018 A1
20180093207 Glover Apr 2018 A1
20190048903 Glover et al. Feb 2019 A1
20190217283 Glover et al. Jul 2019 A1
20190242412 Glover et al. Aug 2019 A1
20190285098 Glover et al. Sep 2019 A1
20190301498 Glover Oct 2019 A1
20190301499 Glover Oct 2019 A1
20190358620 Glover Nov 2019 A1
20200149564 Glover May 2020 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (81)
Number Date Country
2004232690 Nov 2004 AU
2010203014 Aug 2010 AU
2019928 Dec 1991 CA
2520071 Apr 2004 CA
2297113 Feb 2005 CA
2570527 Dec 2005 CA
202072546 Dec 2011 CN
203382593 Jan 2014 CN
585595 Oct 1933 DE
3539195 May 1986 DE
73150 Oct 1933 EP
260826 Mar 1988 EP
576096 Dec 1993 EP
639544 Feb 1995 EP
651041 May 1995 EP
719578 Jul 1996 EP
1001837 Jul 1998 EP
0899011 Mar 1999 EP
1606038 Dec 2005 EP
1755766 Feb 2007 EP
3040119 Jun 2016 EP
3397364 Nov 2018 EP
3414003 Dec 2018 EP
2480137 Oct 1981 FR
2851559 Aug 2004 FR
267877 Jan 1927 GB
374707 Jul 1932 GB
429616 Jun 1935 GB
933124 Aug 1963 GB
1442085 Jul 1976 GB
2108003 May 1983 GB
2149771 Jun 1985 GB
5237396 Sep 1977 JP
5567309 May 1980 JP
5817818 Feb 1983 JP
S581983-024308 Feb 1983 JP
S61 (1986)-134300 Jun 1986 JP
61132097 Aug 1986 JP
S61(1986)-180818 Aug 1986 JP
62114643 May 1987 JP
S63 (1988)-043632 Mar 1988 JP
4187297 Jul 1992 JP
H061994-205922 Jul 1994 JP
1028876 Feb 1998 JP
1057821 Mar 1998 JP
11128734 May 1999 JP
2000-028876 Jan 2000 JP
2000-246048 Sep 2000 JP
2003-120257 Apr 2003 JP
2004-515432 May 2004 JP
2004-530746 Oct 2004 JP
2004-537406 Dec 2004 JP
2006-55749 Mar 2006 JP
2006-205068 Aug 2006 JP
2006-523139 Oct 2006 JP
2007-514529 Jun 2007 JP
2008-545527 Dec 2008 JP
5543817 Jul 2014 JP
2015-085208 May 2015 JP
2016-13748 Aug 2016 JP
2018-61955 Apr 2018 JP
6324420 May 2018 JP
1221298 Jan 2013 KR
1009499 Jan 2000 NL
542787 Jun 2009 NZ
9903561 Jan 1999 WO
2001001536 Jan 2001 WO
2002045838 Jun 2002 WO
2002079346 Oct 2002 WO
2003013725 Feb 2003 WO
2004094039 Nov 2004 WO
2005058472 Jun 2005 WO
2005123221 Dec 2005 WO
2006127671 Nov 2006 WO
2010149908 Dec 2010 WO
2015037730 Mar 2015 WO
2015200513 Dec 2015 WO
2017117492 Jul 2017 WO
2017139597 Aug 2017 WO
2019020705 Jan 2019 WO
200508048 Nov 2006 ZA
Non-Patent Literature Citations (165)
Entry
Snyder Filtration; Nanofiltration Membranes; Retrieved Jun. 15, 2016 from: http://synderfiltration.com/nanofiltration/membranes/; 4 pages; Membrane Technology.
Espacenet; English Translation of CN203382593U; Oct. 4, 2016; 7 pages; Europe.
Espacenet; English Translation of CN202072546U; Oct. 4, 2016; 11 pages; Europe.
Espacenet; English Translation of FR2851559A1; Oct. 4, 2016; 9 pages; Europe.
Espacenet; English Translation of WO2010149908A1; Oct. 4, 2016; 23 pages; Europe.
European Patent Office; PCT International Search Report, Issued in Connection to PCT/US2016/069396; dated Mar. 31, 2017; 3 pages; Europe.
European Patent Office; PCT Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, Issued in Connection to PCT/US2016/069396; dated Mar. 31, 2017; 6 pages; Europe.
Scheffler, Michael; Cellular Ceramics: Structure, Manufacturing, Properties and Applications; Die Beutsche Bibliotheck; 2005; 5 pages; Germany.
Korean Intellectual Property Office; Notification of Provisional Rejection, issued in connection to application No. 10-2018-7021988; dated Oct. 22, 2019; 7 pages; Korea.
European Patent Office; Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC, issued in connection to EP17706648.7; dated Oct. 24, 2019; 7 pages; Europe.
Korean Intellectual Property Office; Notification of Provisional Rejection, issued in connection to application No. 10-2018-7026274; dated Oct. 22, 2019; 14 pages; Korea.
Japanese Patent Office; Final Rejection, issued in connection to application No. 2017-226648; dated Feb. 26, 2020; 6 pages; Japan.
Chilean Patent and Trademark Office; Examiner Report No. 2, issued in connection to application No. 1799-2018; dated Jan. 24, 2020; 12 pages; Chile.
European Patent Office; Communication pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC, issued in connection to EP16834162.6; dated Feb. 4, 2020; 7 pages; Europe.
Japanese Patent Office; Office Action, issued in connection to application No. 2018-553847; dated Feb. 26, 2020; 8 pages; Japan.
Intellectual Property Office of Singapore; Invitation to Respond to Written Opinion, issued in connection with application No. 11201805491X; dated Mar. 3, 2020; 6 pages; Singapore.
Indian Patent Office; Examination Report, issued in connection to application No. 201837023720; dated Jan. 23, 2020; 6 pages; India.
Intellectual Property Office of Singapore; Invitation to Respond to Written Opinion, issued in connection with application No. 11201805367W; dated Mar. 2, 2020; 34 pages; Singapore.
Sinter Metals; Hight Porosity Sintered Materials; p. 1-16.
Strom et al.; Advanced Reticulated Ceramics; Hi-Tech Ceramics; p. 14-19.
Sulzer; Structured Packings for Separation and Reactive Distillation Brochure; pp. 2-27; 2002-2003.
Sweeting et al.; High Surface Reticulated Ceramics for Catalytic Applications; Mat., Res. Soc. Symp. Proc., vol. 549; pp. 17-23; 1999.
Sweeting et al.; Reticulated Ceramics for Catalyst Support Applications; Hi-Tech Ceramics, Inc.; Nov. 30, 1994; 12 pages.
Tan-Atichat and Nagib, “Interaction of free-stream turbulence with screens and grids: a balance between turbulence scales” J. Fluid Mech (1982), vol. 114, pp. 501-528; Great Britain.
Wadley; Cellular Metals Manufacutring; Advanced Engineering Materials; 4; No. 10; pp. 726-733; 2002.
Woodward et al.; Akzo Chemicals' Guard Bed Technology; 16 pages; 1991.
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office; Non-Final Office Action, Issued in Connection with U.S. Appl. No. 11/893,190; dated Mar. 10, 2010; 6 pages; U.S.
Applicant; Amendment and Response, Filed in Connection with U.S. Appl. No. 11/893,190; dated Aug. 20, 2010; 4 pages; U.S.
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office; Final Office Action, Issued in Connection with U.S. Appl. No. 11/893,190; dated Nov. 3, 2010; 5 pages; U.S.
Applicant; Response to Final Office Action, Filed in Connection with U.S. Appl. No. 11/893,190; dated Jan. 3, 2011; 5 pages; U.S.
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office; Non-Final Office Action, Issued in Connection with U.S. Appl. No. 11/893,190; dated Jan. 19, 2011; 5 pages; U.S.
Applicant; Amendment and Response, Filed in Connection with U.S. Appl. No. 11/893,190; dated Jul. 19, 2011; 4 pages; U.S.
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office; Final Office Action, Issued in Connection with U.S. Appl. No. 11/893,190; dated Sep. 22, 2011; 6 pages; U.S.
Applicant; Amendment and Response, Filed in Connection with U.S. Appl. No. 11/893,190; dated Dec. 16, 2011; 5 pages; U.S.
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office; Non-Final Office Action, Issued in Connection with U.S. Appl. No. 11/893,190; dated Jan. 27, 2012; 7 pages; U.S.
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office; Non-Final Office Action, Issued in Connection with U.S. Appl. No. 11/893,190; dated Feb. 6, 2012; 7 pages; U.S.
Applicant; Amendment and Response, Filed in Connection with U.S. Appl. No. 11/893,190; dated Aug. 3, 2012; 6 pages; U.S.
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office; Final Office Action, Issued in Connection with U.S. Appl. No. 11/893,190; dated Oct. 23, 2012; 9 pages; U.S.
Applicant; Amendment and Response, Filed in Connection with U.S. Appl. No. 11/893,190; dated Dec. 24, 2012; 8 pages; U.S.
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office; Advisory Action Before the Filing of an Appeal Brief, Issued in Connection with U.S. Appl. No. 11/893,190; dated Jan. 11, 2013; 3 pages; U.S.
Applicant; Amendment and Response, Filed in Connection with U.S. Appl. No. 11/893,190; dated Feb. 25, 2013; 4 pages; U.S.
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office; Notice of Allowance and Fee(s) Due, Issued in Connection with U.S. Appl. No. 11/893,190; dated May 2, 2013; 8 pages; U.S.
U.S. Court of Appeals Federal Circuit; Purdue Pharma L.P. v. Faulding Inc., 56 USPQ2d 1481 (CA FC 2000); Oct. 25, 2000; 11 pages.
Selected relevant excerpts from file history of U.S. Appl. No. 11/893,190, filed Aug. 15, 2007 and assigned to Applicant for present application.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 10/867,015 (now U.S. Pat. No. 7,393,510, issued Jul. 1, 2008).
New Zealand Intellectual Property Office; Further Examination Report, issued in connection to application No. 743891; dated Jun. 24, 2019; 9 pages; New Zealand.
Japanese Patent Office; Observation, issued in connection to JP2018-541647;Jun. 19, 2019; 40 pages; Japan.
The Japan Petroleum Institute; Petroleum Refining Process; Kodansha Ltd.; May 20, 1998; 6 pages; Japan.
Chen, Xiaodong et al.; Improving the Strength of ZTA Foams with Different Strategies: Immersion Infiltration and Recoating; www.mdpi.com/journal/material;; May 30, 2017; 15 pages.
Intellectual Property Office of Singapore; Written Opinion, issued in connection to application No. 11201805367W; dated Aug. 16, 2019; 7 pages; Singapore.
Intellectual Property Office of Singapore; Written Opinion, issued in connection to application No. 11201805491X; dated Aug. 29, 2019; 6 pages; Singapore.
Intellectual Property India; Examination Report, issued in connection to application No. 201837023710; dated Aug. 28, 2019; 6 pages; India.
Government of Chile, Ministry of Economy, Promotion and Tourism; Examiner's Report and Search Report, issued in connection to application No. 201801799; dated Aug. 9, 2019; 14 pages; Chile.
Canadian Intellectual Property Office; Official Action and Examination Search Report, issued in connection with CA3009845; dated Aug. 28, 2019; 4 pages; Canada.
Ceramic Industry Cover page; and Table of Contents; vol. 147, No. 3; 2 pages; Mar. 1997.
Christy Refractories Company; Prox-Svers Catalyst Support Media; Apr. 1995.
Colombo; Porous Ceramics and Ceramic Components from Preceramic Polymers; http://www.matse.psu.edu/people/faculty/colombo.htm1; 5 pages.
Criterion; Top Bed Catalysts and Support; 1 page.
Crystaphase Products, Inc.; Product Data Information: Ceramic Support—Recycled Silica Alumina; 1 page.
Fay; A Three-Point Generalization of the Ellipse; International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology; Jan. 2002; vol. 33, Issue 1; pp. 111-123.
Foseco Home Page; Internet; p. 1-3; Feb. 21, 1997.
Fulton; CE Refresher: Catalyst Engineering, Part 2, Selecting the Catalyst Configuaration; May 1986' Chemical engineering; pp. 97-101.
Gibson; Cellular Solids, MRS Bulletin; www.mrs.org/publications/bulleting; pp. 270-274; Apr. 2003.
Gibson et al.; Cellular Solids: Structure and Properties; Second Edition, Cambridge Solid State Science Series, Cambridge University Press; 71 pages; 1997.
GKN Sinter Metals; Design Ideas and Application—Porous Discs; 4 pages.
Green et al.; Cellular Ceramics: Intriguing Structures, Novel Properties, and Innovative Applications; www.mrs.org/publications/bulletin; pp. 296-300; Apr. 2003.
Haldor Topsoe, Inc.; Material Safety Data Sheet Inert Topping TK-10; p. 1-4; 1992.
Haldor Topsoe; Topsoe Graded Bed Solutions; 3 pages.
Hickman et al.; Production of Syngas by Direct Catalytic Ocidation of Methane; Science; vol. 256; p. 343-346; Jan. 15, 1993.
Hi-Tech Ceramics; Reticel, Designing the Future with Advanced Reticulated Ceramics; Product Brochure; 6 pages.
Hung et al.; Translation of DE3539195, Hydroprocessing Catalyzer with Specific Geometric Shate; 23 pages; May 2000.
Ivars Peterson's MathLand; Beyond the Ellipse; The Mathematical Association of America; Sep. 2, 1996; 3 pages.
Kim et al.; Effect of Inert Filler Addition on Pore Size and Porosity of Closed-Cell Silicon Oxycarbide Foams; Journal of Materials Science 39; pp. 3513-3515; 2004.
Koch; Reactor Inernals by Koch, Your Way; 1 page.
Loehrke and Nagib, AGARD Report No. R-598 Experiments on Management of Free-stream Turbulence 1972.
Materials 2017, 10(7), 735; “Improving the Strength of ZTA Foams with Different Strategies: Immersion Infiltration and Recoating;” https://doi.org/10.3390/ma10070735; 15 pages; Jul. 1, 2017.
Mills; Ceramic Technology Provides Refining Solutions, Saint-Gobain Norpro; pp. 1-17; 2003.
Mills; Ceramic Guard Bed Materials; Norton Chemical Process Products Corporation; Jun. 3-5, 1998; 24 pages; US.
Natural / Food Foams; 8 pages.
Norton Chemical Process Products Corporation, MacroTrap Guard Bed Media; 6 pages: 1998.
Norton Chemical Process Products Copr.; Denstone Inert Catalyst Bed Supports; 10 pages; 1992; Ohio.
NPRA Q&A Session on Refining and Petrochemical Technology; Section B. Hydrotreating; p. 85-101; 1990.
NPRA Q&A Session on Refining and Petrochemical Technology: Section B. Hydrotreating; p. 98-118; 1991.
NPRA Q&A Session on Refining and Petrochemical Technology: Section B. Hydrotreating; p. 104-135; 1992.
NPRA Q&A Session on Refining and Petrochemical Technology: Section B. Hydrotreating; p. 94-112; 1993.
NPRA Q&A Session on Refining and Petrochemical Technology: Section B. Hydrotreating; p. 98-139; 1994.
NPRA Q&A Session on Refining and Petrochemical Technology: Section B. Hydrotreating; p. 96-123; 1995.
NPRA Q&A Session on Refining and Petrochemical Technology: Section B. Hydrotreating; p. 131-160; 1996.
Olujic et al.; Distillation Column Internals/Configurations for Press . . . , Chem. Biochem, Eng. Q. 17 (4); pp. 301-309; 2003.
Perry's Chemical Engineers' Handbook, 7th Ed., McGraw-Hill, 1997, pp. 6-33-6-34.
Petro Ware, Incl; 86 Catalyst Support Media; Premium Quality from Beginning to End; 21 pages; Ohio.
Petrotech, vol. 4, pp. 382-383; 1981.
Product Bulletin: Criterion 855 MD “Medallions” Inert Catalyst Support; Aug. 1998; 2 pages.
Queheillalt et al.; Synthesis of Stochastic Open Cell Ni-Based Foams; Scripta Materialia 50; pp. 313-317; 2004.
Rashmi Narayan; Particle Capture from Non-Aqueous Media on Packed Beds; Dept. of Chemical and Materials Engineering; 116 pages; Fall 1996; Edmonton, Alberta.
Rauschert; Hiflow Rings Brochure; 5 pages.
Saxonburg Ceramics Incorporated; Product Material Specifications.
Schildhauer; Application of Film-Flow-Monoliths . . . , Technical Univesity Delft; Julianalaan 136, NL-2628 BL Delft; The Netherlands; 1 page; Oct. 29, 2003.
Schlichting, Boundary-Layer Theory; McGraw-Hill; (Translation of Grenzschicht-Theorie, Translated by Dr. J. Kestin), 1979; pp. 230-234.
Selee Corporation; Product Brochure; 6 pages; 1997.
Selee Corporation Home Page; Internet; downloaded Nov. 14, 1996; 3 pages.
Selee Corporation; Ceramic Foam for Thermal/Kiln Furniture Applications; Ceramic Foam Kiln Furniture Phusical Property Data Sheet; Nov. 14, 1996; 2 pages.
Sinter Metals; High Porosity SIKA-R . . . IS; Porous Metals Filter Elements; 3 pages.
Sinter Metals; Tool List, Seamleass SILKA-Elements; 2 pages.
Australian Government, IP Australia, Examination Report No. 1 for Standard Patent Application, Issued in connection to AU2017217834; 3 pages; dated Nov. 14, 2018; Australia.
Australian Government, IP Australia, Examination Report No. 1 for Standard Patent Application, Issued in connection to AU2016381170; 3 pages; dated Apr. 10, 2019; Australia.
Brazilian National Institute of Industrial Property; Technical Examination Report, issued in connection to PI0613275-8; dated Feb. 25, 2016; 16 pages; Brazil.
Canadian Intellectual Property Office; Official Action, issued in connection with CA3009825; dated Jun. 18, 2019; 4 pages; Canada.
Chilean Patent and Trademark Office; Abstract Publication of CL2131-2018; Sep. 28, 2018; 1 page; Chile.
European Patent Office; PCT International Search Report, Issued in Connection to PCT/US2005/020712; dated Mar. 3, 2006; 2 pages; Europe.
European Patent Office; PCT International Search Report, Issued in Connection to PCT/US2004/006366; dated Oct. 20, 2004; 2 pages; Europe.
European Patent Office; PCT International Search Report, Issued in Connection to PCT/US2006/019854; dated Jan. 17, 2007; 2 pages; Europe.
European Patent Office; PCT Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, Issued in Connection to PCT/US2006/019854; dated Jan. 17, 2007; 5 pages; Europe.
European Patent Office; PCT International Search Report, Issued in Connection to PCT/US98/14768; dated Nov. 26, 1998; 3 pages; Europe.
European Patent Office; PCT International Search Report, Issued in Connection to PCT/US2017/017398; 5 pages; Europe.
European Patent Office; PCT Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, Issued in Connection to PCT/US2017/017398; 9 pages; Europe.
European Patent Office; Communicaiton and Search Report, Issued in Connection to EP15192642.5; dated Jun. 2, 2016; 7 pages; Europe.
European Patent Office; Communicaiton Pursuant to Rules 161(1) and 162 EPC, issued in connection to EP17706648.7; dated Sep. 19, 2018; 3 pages; Europe.
European Patent Office; Communicaiton Pursuant to Rules 161(1) and 162 EPC, issued in connection to EP16834162.6; dated Aug. 8, 2018; 3 pages; Europe.
European Patent Office; Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC, issued in connection to EP15192642.5; dated Mar. 13, 2019; 5 pages; Europe.
European Patent Office; Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC, Issued in Connection to EP04716499.1; dated May 9, 2016; 4 pages; Europe.
European Patent Office; Communication pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC, issued in connection to EP04716499.1; dated Mar. 10, 2017; 5 pages; Europe.
European Patent Office; Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC, Issued in Connection to EP04716499.1; dated Mar. 15, 2013; 4 pages; Europe.
European Patent Office; Summons to attend oral proceedings pursuant to Rule 115(1) EPC, issued in connection to EP04716499.1; Feb. 12, 2018; 6 pages; Europe.
European Patent Office; Extended European Search Report, issued in connection to EP18201370.6; dated Apr. 9, 2019; 6 pages; Europe.
European Patent Office; Extended European Search Report, issued in connection to EP15192642.5; dated Jun. 2, 2016; 6 pages; Europe.
European Patent Office; Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC, issued in connection to EP98934597.0; dated Mar. 16, 2009; 3 pages; Europe.
European Patent Office; Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC, issued in connection to EP98934597.0; dated Jun. 21, 2006; 4 pages; Europe.
European Patent Office; Communication Pursuant to Article 96(2) EPC, issued in connection to EP98934597.0; dated Sep. 10, 2004; 4 pages; Europe.
European Patent Office; Communication Pursuant to Article 96(2) EPC, issued in connection to EP98934597.0; dated Dec. 11, 2002; 3 pages; Europe.
European Patent Office; Communication Pursuant to Article 96(2) EPC, issued in connection to EP98934597.0; dated Oct. 8, 2001; 2 pages; Europe.
European Patent Office; Communication Pursuant to Article 96(2) EPC, issued in connection to EP05760680.8; dated Jan. 28, 2009; 6 pages; Europe.
European Patent Office; Communication Pursuant to Article 96(2) EPC, issued in connection to EP05760680.8; dated Jul. 5, 2010; 5 pages; Europe.
The International Bureau OT WIPO; PCT International Preliminary Report on Patentability, Issued in Connection to PCT/2005/020712; dated Dec. 14, 2006; 5 pages; Switzerland.
The International Bureau OT WIPO; PCT International Preliminary Report on Patentability, Issued in Connection to PCT/2004/006366; dated Oct. 1, 2005; 5 pages; Switzerland.
Japanese Patent Office; Notice of Reasons for Rejection, issued in connection to JP2010-246536; dated Sep. 7, 2012; 8 pages; Japan.
Japan Patent Office; Notice of Reasons for Rejection, issued in connection with JP2010-246536; dated Nov. 12, 2013; 6 pages; Japan.
Japan Patent Office; Certified Copy of Final Rejection, issued in connection with JP2010-246536; dated Jun. 25, 2014; 2 pages; Japan.
Japan Patent Office; Decision to Dismiss Amendment, issued in connection to JP2010-246536; dated Jun. 25, 2014; 3 pages; Japan.
Japanese Patent Office; Notice of Reasons for Rejection of Japanese Patent Application 2016-017373; dated Dec. 7, 2016; 11 pages; Japan.
Japanese Patent Office; Certified Copy of Decision of Dismissal of Amendment, issued in connection to JP2014-217190; 4 pages; Japan.
Japanese Patent Office; Certified Copy of Final Rejection, issued in connection to JP2014-217190; 3 pages; Japan.
Japanese Patent Office; Notice of Reasons for Rejection, issued in connection to JP2014-217190; dated Aug. 31, 2016; 6 pages; Japan.
Japanese Patent Office; Notice of Reasons for Rejection, issued in connection to JP2014-217190; dated Sep. 30, 2015; 8 pages; Japan.
Japanese Patent Office; Observation, issued in connection to JP2017-226648; Jul. 17, 2018; 50 pages; Japan.
Japanese Patent Office; Notice of Reasons for Rejection, issued in connection to JP2017-226648; dated Jan. 31, 2019; 10 pages; Japan.
Japanese Patent Office; Notice of Resons for Rejection, issued in connection to JP2018-553847; dated May 29, 2019; 10 pages; Japan.
New Zealand Intellectual Property Office; First Examination Report, issued in connection to application No. 743895; dated Jan. 31, 2019; 5 pages; New Zealand.
New Zealand Intellectual Property Office; First Examination Report, issued in connection to application No. 743891; dated Nov. 6, 2018; 10 pages; New Zealand.
Behrens et al.; Performance of a Monolith-like Structured; Chem. Biochem. Eng. Q. 15 (2); pp. 49-57; 2001.
Beihai Huihuang Chemical Packing Co. Lts., http://77520.pub.diysite.com/sc.deliver/main/0-4-5/4/0-ma.html?siteid=77520; 10 pages; May 5, 2003.
BT-750 ¾ D Ceramic Wagon Wheel Unit; 1 page.
Butcher; Reticulated Ceramic Foam as a Catalyst Support; Seminar for CatCon '98; Jun. 3-5, 1998; Ohio.
Australian Government, IP Australia, Examination Report No. 2 for Standard Patent Application, Issued in connection to AU2016381170; 3 pages; dated Nov. 8, 2019; Australia.
Criterion; Technical Bulletin: Loading Your Hydrotreating Reactor for Maximum Activity; Criterion Catalysts & Technologies; 3 pages; 2008.
Saint-Gobain Norpro; Denstone® Deltrap® Support Media; 6 pages; printed Oct. 1, 2019; https://www.norpro.saint-gobain.com/support-media/denstone-deltap.
Saint-Gobain Norpro; Tools Help Optimize Selection of Denstone® Bed Support Media; Apr. 4, 2019; 4 pages; https://www.norpro.saint-gobain.com/articles/tools-help-optimize-selection-denstone-bed-support-media-article.
Chilean Patent and Trademark Office; Examiner Report, issued in connection to application No. 2131-2018; 17 pages; dated Aug. 29, 2019; Chile.
Chilean Patent and Trademark Office; Search Report, issued in connection to application No. 2131-2018; 3 pages; dated Aug. 29, 2019; Chile.
Japanese Patent Office; Notice of Reasons for Rejection, issued in connection to JP2018-541647; dated Aug. 28, 2019; 14 pages; Japan.
National Institute of Industrial Property of Brazil; Office Action, issued in connection to application No. BR 112018013488-0; dated Feb. 2, 2020; 4 pages; Brazil.
Canadian Intellectual Property Office; Office Action, issued in connection to application No. 3009825; dated Apr. 22, 2020; 3 pages; Canada.
Japanese Patent Office; Statement of Submission of Publication by third part, filed in connection to application No. 2019-140168; Apr. 21, 2020; 1 page; Japan.
Canadian Intellectual Property Office; Examiner Report, issued in connection to application No. CA3009845; dated May 20, 2020; 3 pages; Canada.
Kabe, Toshiaki; Hydrotreating—Science and Technology; Oct. 20, 2000; pp. 367-379; IPC KK.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20170189834 A1 Jul 2017 US
Provisional Applications (2)
Number Date Country
62273590 Dec 2015 US
62294718 Feb 2016 US