A variety of electronic displays are used with electronic devices. Displays can operate using either emissive (pixels generate light), transmissive (light transmitted through pixels) and reflective (ambient light reflected) approaches. Display types may include, for example, liquid crystal displays (LCDs) which use liquid crystal cells that change transmission, or reflection in an applied electric field, organic light emitting diode (OLED) devices which utilize a light emitting diode (LED) in which an emissive electroluminescent film of organic compounds emits light in response to an electric current, and different types of electrophoretic displays in which pigmented particles are moved in response to an electric field (e.g. Gyricon, E-ink, etc.).
The LCD panel typically consists of two sheets of glass separated by a sealed-in liquid crystal material. Both sheets have a thin transparent coating of conducting material, with the viewing side etched into segments with leads going to the edge of the display. Voltages applied between the front and back coatings disrupt the orderly arrangement of the molecules sufficiently to darken the liquid and form visible patterns.
Additionally, displays have been developed that can detect the presence and location of touch, e.g., by a finger, or passive object such as a stylus or digital pen, are commonly referred to as touch screens. Touch screens have become a component of many computer and electronic devices. Many LCD displays are manufactured to include touch screen functionality. Touch screens can be attached or incorporated into to computers, networks, mobile telephones, video games, personal digital assistants (PDA), tablets, or any digital device. A variety of technologies are currently used to produce a device with touch screen capabilities. Technologies that enable touch screen functionality include: resistive touch screen panels; surface acoustic wave technology; capacitive sensing panels (e.g., using surface capacitance technology or projective capacitive touch technology, which uses either mutual capacitive sensors or self-capacitive sensors); infrared; optical imaging; dispersive signal technology; and acoustic pulse recognition. Touch screen functionality can be combined with a display in a device in many configurations. The touch screen sensing circuits can be incorporated directly in or on the layers of the display (using, for example, “in-cell” or “on-cell” approaches), built on a separate substrate which is laminated onto the display (e.g., using an “out-cell” approach), or laminated on a cover lens which protects the display in the device, or the sensing circuits can be incorporated directly on the back-side of this cover lens (“Touch-on-Lens”). See, for example, US2011/01025678A1 to Erhart published May 5, 2011, US2011/0102569A1 to Erhart published May 5, 2011, US 2011/0267298A1 to Erhart published Nov. 3, 2011, and US2012/0242635A1 to Erhart published Sep. 27, 2012.
As will be appreciated by those skilled in the art, electronic devices can be configured to include a variety of components and features including: a display, a touch screen, a scratch-resistant cover (e.g., lens), storage, a system on a chip, a CPU core, a GPU core, memory, Wi-Fi connectivity (e.g., 902.11 b.g), Bluetooth connectivity (e.g., USB connector), camera, audio, battery (e.g., built-in, rechargeable lithium-ion polymer battery), power connector, computer readable media, instructions capable of being performed by computer readable media (e.g., software), etc.
One drawback of currently available electronic device interfaces is that the screen can be damaged fairly easily. This can be particularly problematic for devices that are designed for increased mobility and may be subjected to harsh conditions. Currently, devices having an interface are manufactured to withstand a drop of ˜1 foot. As will be appreciated, portable devices such as smart phones, touch pads, and other devices having currently available interfaces may often be deployed in environments where the device will be subjected to physical trauma, such as having a user drop the device from a height greater than 1 foot or having a heavy object fall on the device What is needed, therefore, is a device interface that can withstand the force of an impact equivalent to an impact resistance drop test performed at a height greater than 1 foot, more preferably, greater than 4 feet and even more preferably greater than 6 feet.
An aspect of the disclosure is directed to electronic device displays, methods of making the displays, and methods of using devices with the displays. Displays are formed from a thin glass (e.g., 30 um to 200 um in thickness), an adhesive (having a thickness d and a hardness K or Ym), and a base glass having a thickness of from 0.1 mm to 0.5 mm or greater. Either, neither or both the thin glass and base glass can be chemically strengthened. The total thickness of the adhesive layer between the thin glass and the base glass is preferably about 8-mil (200 um) or less, more preferably about 4-mil (100 um) or less, and even more preferably 3-mil (75 um or less) in thickness. Additionally, the modulus of the adhesive layer between the thin glass and the base glass has a modulus, when averaged by their thickness, of 1 GPa or greater, more preferably 2 GPa or greater, and even more preferably 3 GPa or greater.
Another aspect of the disclosure is directed to electronic device displays with sensors and methods of making the displays. Electronic device displays include, for example, a thin glass layer, a clear adhesive layer, a sensor layer, a plastic film layer, a second clear adhesive layer, and a base glass layer. Either, neither or both the thin glass and base glass can be chemically strengthened. The total thickness of the one or more adhesive layers is preferably about 8-mil (200 um) or less, more preferably about 4-mil (100 um) or less, and even more preferably 3-mil (75 um or less) in thickness. Additionally, the average modulus of the one or more adhesive layers between the thin glass and the base glass has a modulus, when averaged by their thickness, of 1 GPa or greater, more preferably 2 GPa or greater, and even more preferably 3 GPa or greater.
Still another aspect of the disclosure is directed to electronic device displays with sensors and methods of making the displays. Electronic device displays include, for example, a thin glass layer, a clear adhesive layer, a sensor layer, a second thin glass layer, a second clear adhesive layer, and a base glass layer. The total thickness of the one or more adhesive layers is preferably about 8-mil (200 um) or less, more preferably about 4-mil (100 um) or less, and even more preferably 3-mil (75 um or less) in thickness. Additionally, the average modulus of the one or more adhesive layers between the thin glass and the base glass has a modulus, when averaged by their thickness, of 1 GPa or greater, more preferably 2 GPa or greater, and even more preferably 3 GPa or greater.
Yet another aspect of the disclosure is directed to electronic device displays which are constructed to withstand damage from a force equivalent to an impact resistance test wherein a steel ball of 2 g having a diameter of 8 mm is dropped from a designated height greater than 1 foot, more preferably greater than 2 foot, even more preferably greater than 3 foot, still even more preferably greater than 4 foot, yet even more preferably greater than 5 foot and even more preferably greater than 6 foot.
Yet another aspect of the disclosure is directed to electronic device displays which are constructed to withstand damage from a force equivalent to an impact resistance test wherein a steel ball of 130 g (+/−5 g) having a diameter of 31.8 mm (+/−1 mm) is dropped from a designated height greater than 1 foot, more preferably greater than 2 foot, even more preferably greater than 3 foot, still even more preferably greater than 4 foot.
Still another aspect of the disclosure is directed to an electronic display device that uses a transparent flex which can incorporate a wide variety of electronics into the display thereby creating a smart piece of glass.
An aspect of the disclosure is directed to impact resistant display devices. The impact resistant display devices comprise: a first thin glass layer having a thickness less than 400 micrometers; a second base glass layer having a thickness of from 0.1 to 0.5 mm; an adhesive layer positionable between the first thin glass layer and the second base glass layer having a thickness of 200 micrometers or less wherein the adhesive layer is selected based on one or more of a GPa measurement and a Young's Modulus measurement for the adhesive; and a sensor layer positioned between the first thin glass layer and the second base glass layer dimensioned to cover at least a portion of the height and width of the first thin glass layer or the second glass layer wherein the sensor layer is adaptable to communicate with a printed circuit board, wherein the display device has a total thickness of less than 800 micrometers and is constructed to pass a ball drop test of 2 grams at greater than 4 feet. In some configurations, a second thin glass layer is provided, wherein the sensor layer is positioned between the first thin glass layer and the second thin glass layer. Additionally, a plastic layer and a second adhesive layer can be provided, wherein the plastic layer and the second adhesive layer are positioned between the first thin glass layer and the second glass layer such that the two adhesive layers are not adjacent. The thickness-averaged modulus of the first adhesive layer, the second adhesive layer and the plastic layer is, in at least some configurations, greater than 1 GPa. Additionally, one or more of a coating, a plastic film, an ink layer, an anti-fingerprint layer, and a scratch-resistant layer can be provided. In still other configurations, the interface is in communication with a one or more of a printed circuit board, storage, memory, a system on a chip, a CPU core, a GPU core, Wi-Fi connectivity, Bluetooth connectivity, camera, audio, battery, power connector, computer readable media, and instructions for operation on computer readable media. The adhesive layer can also be selected such that it comprises several layers of different materials, and the modulus averaged by thickness through the adhesive is greater than 1 GPa. Additionally, the adhesive layer can have a modulus of greater than 1 GPa. In some aspects, the adhesive is optically transparent. Additionally, the sensor layer can further comprise thin patterned conductive traces. Suitable sensors include one or more of each of a touch screen sensor and a biometric sensor, such as a one dimensional or two dimensional fingerprint sensor. In at least some configurations, the thickness of the adhesive layer is a function of the at least one of the modulus GPa value for the adhesive and the Young's Modulus value of the adhesive. An amount of deformation of the first thin glass layer relative to the glass layer can be a function of at least one of a thickness between the first thin glass layer and the second glass layer and at least one of the GPa value for the adhesive and the Young's Modulus value of the adhesive. A second sensor layer can also be provided that is positioned between the first thin glass layer and the second base glass layer dimensioned to cover at least a portion of the height and width of the first thin glass layer or the second glass layer wherein the second sensor layer is adaptable to communicate with a printed circuit board and to operate independently of the first sensor layer.
Still another aspect of the disclosure is directed to impact resistant display devices. The impact resistant display devices comprise: a first thin glass layer having a thickness less than 400 micrometers; a second base glass layer having a thickness of from 0.1 to 0.5 mm; an adhesive layer positionable between the first thin glass layer and the second base glass layer having a thickness of 200 micrometers or less wherein the adhesive layer is selected based on one or more of a GPa measurement and a Young's Modulus measurement for the adhesive; and a sensor layer positioned between the first thin glass layer and the second base glass layer dimensioned to cover at least a portion of the height and width of the first thin glass layer or the second glass layer wherein the sensor layer is adaptable to communicate with a printed circuit board, wherein the display device has a total thickness of less than 1100 micrometers and is constructed to pass a ball drop test of 2 grams at greater than 4 feet.
Another aspect of the disclosure is directed to a method for making an impact resistant display device. The method comprises the steps of: providing a first thin glass layer having a thickness less than 400 micrometers, an adhesive layer having a thickness of from 0.01 to 0.4 mm and a second base glass layer having a thickness of from 0.1 to 0.5 mm; providing a sensor layer dimensioned to cover at least a portion of the height and width of the first thin glass layer or the second base glass layer; forming the adhesive layer on a surface the thin glass layer; placing the second base glass layer on the adhesive layer, wherein the display device is less than 800 micrometers in thickness and is constructed to pass a ball drop test of 2 grams at greater than 4 feet. Additional steps include, for example, applying a sheet of plastic to the sensor layer. The thin sheet of plastic can also have a conductive traces patterned on one or both sides. Additionally, a second thin glass layer wherein the sensor layer is positioned between the first thin glass layer and the second thin glass layer. An additional step can include providing a second sensor layer dimensioned to cover at least a portion of a height and width of the first thin glass layer or the second base glass layer.
Another aspect of the disclosure is directed to a method for making an impact resistant display device. The method comprises the steps of: providing a first thin glass layer having a thickness less than 400 micrometers, an adhesive layer having a thickness of from 0.01 to 0.4 mm and a second base glass layer having a thickness of from 0.1 to 0.5 mm; providing a sensor layer dimensioned to cover at least a portion of the height and width of the first thin glass layer or the second base glass layer; forming the adhesive layer on a surface the thin glass layer; placing the second base glass layer on the adhesive layer, wherein the display device is less than 1100 micrometers in thickness and is constructed to pass a ball drop test of 2 grams at greater than 4 feet.
All publications, patents, and patent applications mentioned in this specification are herein incorporated by reference to the same extent as if each individual publication, patent, or patent application was specifically and individually indicated to be incorporated by reference.
The novel features of the invention are set forth with particularity in the appended claims. A better understanding of the features and advantages of the present invention will be obtained by reference to the following detailed description that sets forth illustrative embodiments, in which the principles of the invention are utilized, and the accompanying drawings of which:
I. Devices
For purposes of illustration a touch screen display currently employed by, for example, a smart phone is described. Such a touch screen typically comprises a 9 cm (3.5 in)×6 cm (2.4 in) liquid crystal display (LCD) with a scratch-resistant glass layer. Other size touch screens can be employed without departing from the scope of the disclosure.
The capacitive touch screen of the LCD is typically optimized for a bare finger, or multiple finger multi-touch, sensing. However, as will be appreciated by those skilled in the art, a variety displays as well as a variety of touch screen configurations and touch screen operated devices can be used without departing from the scope of the disclosure.
An LCD touch screen typically is an assembly that includes an LCD, a printed circuit board (PCB) on which input-output (I/O) connections and integrated circuits (ICs) performing various functions are mounted, a transparent touch screen circuit pattern on a transparent substrate, and a protective shield or coating applied on top of the touch screen circuitry.
The touch screen circuitry is connected along with the LCD display to the PCB. The touch screen circuitry is typically incorporated into the assembly using one of two methods. In a first method, the touch screen circuitry is incorporated directly into or onto the LCD, then a protective shield or coating (e.g. cover lens) is located above the LCD/Touch screen combination. In a second method, the touch screen circuitry is applied onto the protective coating or shield (e.g. cover lens) and then the resulting structure is mounted above the LCD, with the touch screen circuitry mounted between the protective coating or shield and the LCD. In all cased the PCB is located below the LCD, out of view.
The device itself has a top surface 102 and a bottom surface 104. Moreover, each component of the device 100 has an upper surface (i.e. a surface that faces the top surface of the device) and a lower surface (i.e. a surface that faces the bottom surface of the device) as will be appreciated from the cross-sectional views. The housing 110 of the electronic device 100 can be configured to form a bezel or rim 112 which secures the interface 120 within the housing 110 of the device 100. A mask 124, such as an ink mask, can be provided which frames at least part of the interface 120. The mask 124 is typically positioned such that it obscures device electronics located within the housing under a portion of the interface 120. For a touch screen enabled interface, a portion of the interface 120 that is not covered by mask 124 has a plurality of touch screen sensors 134. The plurality of touch screen sensors 134 can be any suitable conductor, including a transparent conductor, for example, from a layer of patterned indium tin oxide (ITO), carbon nanotubes, metal nanowires, conductive polymers or fine metal lines (e.g., copper lines). The dimensions of the device interface 120 can be from 3-25 cm width and from 5-30 cm in length.
Turning now to
For various electronic and optical device products, including, but not limited to, capacitive fingerprint sensors, touch sensors and displays, it is desired to incorporate a layer (also referred to as a sheet) of thin glass as discussed below with respect to
In two specific implementations provided for illustration, a capacitive fingerprint sensor and/or a capacitive touch sensor may need to be incorporated into a device which has a display, such as on a touch screen phone. These phones often have a cover lens which is made from a chemically strengthened glass or base glass, typically 0.5 mm thick or thicker. However, as will be appreciated by those skilled in the art, cover lenses having a thickness between 0.3 mm and 0.5 mm, such as an ultrathin glass (UT), can also be used. This cover lens can also have other thin layers such as inks printed on them for visual effects or coatings used to reduce fingerprint smudging or enhance scratch resistance. In this embodiment, the sensors are located close to the finger, in this case within either 50 micrometers, 100 micrometers, or values between 30 micrometers and 300 micrometers. Thus, the sensors can be placed above the cover lens, or incorporated as part of a cover lens assembly. It is desired to place a glass layer above the sensor to retain the feel and many of the properties of the glass surface for the user.
II. Methods of Manufacture
As disclosed here, a method and structure has been developed which enables thin glass to be incorporated into these device products (and similar device products or components thereof) while achieving the durability that is required. Specifically, when this structure is subjected to steel ball impact tests, as discussed below, the results are similar to those obtained for existing commercial cover lenses made from strengthened glass. By providing the thin glass surface at or near the surface of the device product, the results of hardness and scratch resistance may also be similar to that for the existing commercial cover lenses made from strengthened glass.
In this example, sensors 448 can be made from thin patterned conductive traces on the surface (either top, bottom or both) of a thin sheet of plastic 464. With appropriate patterns and connections, these patterns can comprise, for example, a fingerprint sensor, a touch sensor, or a combination of both, and may or may not be transparent (e.g. could be copper or ITO or a combination of both). This sensor layer may cover the entire area of the cover lens, or only part of the area. There may also be ink patterns 424 printed on the surfaces of one of the glass layers or the plastic sheet, as for example a masking layer typically used in a cell phone. One or more adhesive layers 452, 452′, can be used between and around the different layers to bond the assembly together.
In
Additionally, a thin glass laminate (having a thickness of from 30-500 micrometers) 422, 422′ can be positioned above and below the sensor 448.
Additionally, a thin glass laminate (having a thickness of from 30-500 micrometers) 522, 522′ comprised of a first thin glass layer 522 and an second thin glass layer 522′ can be positioned above and below the sensor 548.
One primary problem which this disclosure addresses is that the thin glass layer in assemblies, like the ones illustrated in
As will be appreciated by those skilled in the art, hardness can be defined many ways. The Bulk Elastic Modulus, K, is an example of a suitable measurement. However, this value is not always readily available, but for many of the materials of interest the Young's Modulus, YM, can be used as a substitute as it is often measured.
The configurations of this disclosure utilize a total thickness of the layers between the thin glass layer and base glass layer of about 8-mil (200 um) or less, more specifically 4-mil (100 um) or less, and even more specifically 3-mil (75 um or less) in thickness. Additionally, the modulus of these middle layers, averaged by their thicknesses, is 1 GPa or greater. When much of this thickness is defined by the adhesive thickness, the adhesive will be one of a high hardness.
Types of adhesives that are included are polyester-based resins, acrylic-based resins and polycarbonate-based resins.
The device interfaces disclosed herein achieve an increased durability and performance of the electronic device interface by optimizing the thickness of the adhesive layer and the hardness.
The cover lens assemblies can be fabricated using a variety of processes, which depend critically on the type of adhesive being used. In general, the stack of layers are built-up sequentially by applying each layer on top of the other. This can happen in whichever order is appropriate for the desired handling of materials and schedule of applying process conditions such as heating, exposure to UV or applying pressure.
In one example, thermoforming and thermosetting adhesives are used, which are supplied as thin dry sheets. For these materials the full assembly is stacked up, which includes (by illustration of
In another example, optically clear pressure sensitive adhesive (PSA) films, commonly referred to as optically clear adhesives (OCAs), are used. When using these adhesives, lamination is done by applying the film(s) with a roller laminator which applies pressure as the films are laminated. Heat may also be applied either during or after the physical lamination. The sequence of assembly may vary depending on many factors of material handling. In one example for these materials (by illustration of
Other adhesives may include liquid epoxies. These may be applied as layers using a variety of coating methods including spray, gravure, slot, dispense, spin methods. Once the stack of layers to be bonded by the epoxy are formed, the epoxy may be hardened and cured using heat and/or exposure to UV radiation.
III. Methods of Use
An electronic device 100 configurable to position a sensor, such as a 1D sensor, a 2D sensor or a touch sensor, within sensing region is deployed by a user. The user applies and/or swipes his or her finger, or applies the element to be sensed, to a surface of the device in a position in communication with the sensor.
For example, the element to be sensed (such as a finger) can be applied (e.g., by swiping across the surface) in a position that is in communication with the sensing element. Thus, for example, the fingerprint is sensed by the fingerprint sensor and/or biometric input is received. The sensed input (such as a fingerprint) is validated. Once validated, use of the electronic device 100 is permitted or other functionality controlled by the fingerprint authentication is permitted.
As will be appreciated by those skilled in the art, the sensors disclosed can be used in a variety of ways including, for example:
Impact Resistance Test: STR® 15420P vs. DuPont® PV5412
The object of this test was to measure the difference between STR Photocap® 15420P EVA thermal adhesive (˜400 um), available from Specialized Technology Resources, Inc. (www.strsolar.com, Enfield, Conn.), and DuPont® PV5412 thermal adhesive (380 um), available from DuPont Photovoltaic Solutions (www2.dupont.com/photovoltaics/en_US/products_services!), via an Impact Resistance Test. To achieve this, a 2 g steel ball with a diameter of 8 mm was dropped from a designated height five times. The drop height was increased until failure occurred. The test package consisted of: glass, thermal adhesive, thin glass. A substantial difference was measured between the two thermal adhesives, the DuPont PV5412 adhesive increased impact strength over the STR EVA material. The impact resistance improvement is attributed to the greater hardness of the Dupont PV5412 material.
While preferred embodiments of the present invention have been shown and described herein, it will be obvious to those skilled in the art that such embodiments are provided by way of example only. Numerous variations, changes, and substitutions will now occur to those skilled in the art without departing from the invention. It should be understood that various alternatives to the embodiments of the invention described herein may be employed in practicing the invention. It is intended that the following claims define the scope of the invention and that methods and structures within the scope of these claims and their equivalents be covered thereby.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/582,660, entitled Structure and Manufacturing Methods for Glass Covered Electronic Device by Paul Wickboldt and Eric Jones, filed Jan. 3, 2012, which application is incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4151512 | Riganati et al. | Apr 1979 | A |
4225850 | Chang et al. | Sep 1980 | A |
4310827 | Asi | Jan 1982 | A |
4353056 | Tsikos | Oct 1982 | A |
4405829 | Rivest et al. | Sep 1983 | A |
4525859 | Bowles et al. | Jun 1985 | A |
4550221 | Mabusth | Oct 1985 | A |
4580790 | Doose | Apr 1986 | A |
4758622 | Gosselin | Jul 1988 | A |
4817183 | Sparrow | Mar 1989 | A |
5076566 | Kriegel | Dec 1991 | A |
5109427 | Yang | Apr 1992 | A |
5140642 | Hsu et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5305017 | Gerpheide | Apr 1994 | A |
5319323 | Fong | Jun 1994 | A |
5325442 | Knapp | Jun 1994 | A |
5420936 | Fitzpatrick et al. | May 1995 | A |
5422807 | Mitra et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5456256 | Schneider et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5543591 | Gillespie et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5569901 | Bridgelall et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5623552 | Lane | Apr 1997 | A |
5627316 | De Winter et al. | May 1997 | A |
5650842 | Maase et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5717777 | Wong et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5781651 | Hsiao et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5801681 | Sayag | Sep 1998 | A |
5818956 | Tuli | Oct 1998 | A |
5838306 | O'Connor | Nov 1998 | A |
5848176 | Harra et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5850450 | Schweitzer et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5852670 | Setlak et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5864296 | Upton | Jan 1999 | A |
5887343 | Salatino et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5892824 | Beatson et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5903225 | Schmitt et al. | May 1999 | A |
5915757 | Tsuyama et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5920384 | Borza | Jul 1999 | A |
5920640 | Salatino et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5940526 | Setlak et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5999637 | Toyoda et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6002815 | Immega et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6016355 | Dickinson et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6052475 | Upton | Apr 2000 | A |
6067368 | Setlak et al. | May 2000 | A |
6073343 | Petrick et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6076566 | Lowe | Jun 2000 | A |
6088585 | Schmitt et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6098175 | Lee | Aug 2000 | A |
6134340 | Hsu et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6157722 | Lerner et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6161213 | Lofstrom | Dec 2000 | A |
6175407 | Santor | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6182076 | Yu et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6182892 | Angelo et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6185318 | Jain et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6234031 | Suga | May 2001 | B1 |
6241288 | Bergenek et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6259108 | Antonelli et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6289114 | Mainguet | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6317508 | Kramer et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6320394 | Tartagni | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6332193 | Glass et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6333989 | Borza | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6337919 | Dunton | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6346739 | Lepert et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6347040 | Fries et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6360004 | Akizuki | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6362633 | Tartagni | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6392636 | Ferrari et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6399994 | Shobu | Jun 2002 | B2 |
6400836 | Senior | Jun 2002 | B2 |
6401551 | Kawahara et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6408087 | Kramer | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6473072 | Comiskey et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6509501 | Eicken et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6539101 | Black | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6580816 | Kramer et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6597289 | Sabatini | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6643389 | Raynal et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6672174 | Deconde et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6738050 | Comiskey et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6741729 | Bjorn et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6757002 | Oross et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6766040 | Catalano et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6785407 | Tschudi et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6838905 | Doyle | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6886104 | McClurg et al. | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6897002 | Teraoka et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6898299 | Brooks | May 2005 | B1 |
6924496 | Manansala | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6937748 | Schneider et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6941001 | Bolle et al. | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6941810 | Okada | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6950540 | Higuchi | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6959874 | Bardwell | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6963626 | Shaeffer et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6970584 | O'Gorman et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6980672 | Saito et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6983882 | Cassone | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7013030 | Wong et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7020591 | Wei et al. | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7030860 | Hsu et al. | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7035443 | Wong | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7042535 | Katoh et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7043061 | Hamid et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7043644 | DeBruine | May 2006 | B2 |
7046230 | Zadesky et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7064743 | Nishikawa | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7099496 | Benkley | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7110577 | Tschudi | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7113622 | Hamid | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7126389 | McRae et al. | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7129926 | Mathiassen et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7136514 | Wong | Nov 2006 | B1 |
7146024 | Benkley | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7146026 | Russon et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7146029 | Manansala | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7190816 | Mitsuyu et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7194392 | Tuken et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7197168 | Russo | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7200250 | Chou | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7251351 | Mathiassen et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7258279 | Schneider et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7260246 | Fujii | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7263212 | Kawabe | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7263213 | Rowe | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7289649 | Walley et al. | Oct 2007 | B1 |
7290323 | Deconde et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7308121 | Mathiassen et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7308122 | McClurg et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7321672 | Sasaki et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7356169 | Hamid | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7360688 | Harris | Apr 2008 | B1 |
7369685 | DeLeon | May 2008 | B2 |
7379569 | Chikazawa et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7409876 | Ganapathi et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7412083 | Takahashi | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7424618 | Roy et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7447339 | Mimura et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7447911 | Chou et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7460697 | Erhart et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7463756 | Benkley | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7505611 | Fyke | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7505613 | Russo | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7565548 | Fiske et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7574022 | Russo | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7643950 | Getzin et al. | Jan 2010 | B1 |
7646897 | Fyke | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7681232 | Nordentoft et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7689013 | Shinzaki | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7706581 | Drews et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7733697 | Picca et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7751601 | Benkley | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7843438 | Onoda | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7899216 | Watanabe et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7953258 | Dean et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
8005276 | Dean et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8031916 | Abiko et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8077935 | Geoffroy et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
20010026636 | Mainguet | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010030644 | Allport | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010036299 | Senior | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010043728 | Kramer et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020025062 | Black | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020061125 | Fujii | May 2002 | A1 |
20020064892 | Lepert et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020067845 | Griffis | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020073046 | David | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020089044 | Simmons et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020089410 | Janiak et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020096731 | Wu et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020122026 | Bergstrom | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020126516 | Jeon | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020133725 | Roy et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020181749 | Matsumoto et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030002717 | Hamid | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030002719 | Hamid et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030021495 | Cheng | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030035570 | Benkley, III | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030063782 | Acharya et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030068072 | Hamid | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030076301 | Tsuk et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030076303 | Huppi | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030095096 | Robbin et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030102874 | Lane et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030123714 | O'Gorman et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030123715 | Uchida | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030141959 | Keogh et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030147015 | Katoh et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030161510 | Fuji | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030161512 | Mathiassen | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030169228 | Mathiassen et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030174256 | Kim et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030174871 | Yoshioka et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030186157 | Teraoka et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030209293 | Sako et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030224553 | Manansala | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040012773 | Puttkammer | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040022001 | Chu et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040042642 | Bolle et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040050930 | Rowe | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040066613 | Leitao | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040076313 | Bronstein et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040081339 | Benkley | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040096086 | Miyasaka | May 2004 | A1 |
20040113956 | Bellwood et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040120400 | Linzer | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040125993 | Zhao et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040129787 | Saito | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040136612 | Meister et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040172339 | Snelgrove et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040179718 | Chou | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040184641 | Nagasaka et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040190761 | Lee | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040208346 | Baharav et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040208347 | Baharav et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040208348 | Baharav et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040213441 | Tschudi | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040215689 | Dooley et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040228505 | Sugimoto | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040228508 | Shigeta | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040240712 | Rowe et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040252867 | Lan et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050031174 | Ryhanen et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050036665 | Higuchi | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050047485 | Khayrallah et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050100196 | Scott et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050109835 | Jacoby et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050110103 | Setlak | May 2005 | A1 |
20050111708 | Chou | May 2005 | A1 |
20050123176 | Ishii et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050136200 | Durell et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050139656 | Arnouse | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050162402 | Watanachote | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050169503 | Howell et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050210271 | Chou et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050219200 | Weng | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050220329 | Payne et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050231213 | Chou et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050238212 | Du et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050244038 | Benkley | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050244039 | Geoffroy et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050249386 | Juh | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050258952 | Utter et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050269402 | Spitzer et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060006224 | Modi | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060017862 | Song et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060055500 | Burke et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060066572 | Yumoto et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060078176 | Abiko et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060083411 | Benkley | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060099411 | Xia et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060110537 | Huang et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060140461 | Kim et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060144953 | Takao | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060170528 | Fukushige et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060187200 | Martin | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060210082 | Devadas et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060214512 | Iwata | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060239514 | Watanabe et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060249008 | Luther | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060259873 | Mister | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060261174 | Zellner et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060271793 | Devadas et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060287963 | Steeves et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070031011 | Erhart et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070036400 | Watanabe et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070057763 | Blattner et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070067828 | Bychkov | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070076926 | Schneider et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070076951 | Tanaka et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070086634 | Setlak et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070090312 | Stallinga et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070138299 | Mitra | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070180261 | Akkermans et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070198141 | Moore | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070198435 | Siegal et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070228154 | Tran | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070237366 | Maletsky | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070248249 | Stoianov | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080002867 | Mathiassen et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080013805 | Sengupta et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080019578 | Saito et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080049987 | Champagne et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080049989 | Iseri et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080063245 | Benkley et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080069412 | Champagne et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080126260 | Cox et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080169345 | Keane et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080170695 | Adler et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080175450 | Scott et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080178008 | Takahashi et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080179112 | Qin et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080185429 | Saville | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080201265 | Hewton | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080205714 | Benkley et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080219521 | Benkley et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080222049 | Loomis et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080223925 | Saito et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080226132 | Gardner | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080240523 | Benkley et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080244277 | Orsini et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080267462 | Nelson et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080279373 | Erhart et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090130369 | Huang et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090153297 | Gardner | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090154779 | Satyan et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090155456 | Benkley et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090169071 | Bond et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090174974 | Huang et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090237135 | Ramaraju et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090252384 | Dean et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090252385 | Dean et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090252386 | Dean et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090279742 | Abiko | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090319435 | Little et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090322705 | Halsey, IV | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090324028 | Russo | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100026451 | Erhart et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100045705 | Vertegaal et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100083000 | Kesanupalli et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100097080 | Kobayashi et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100119124 | Satyan | May 2010 | A1 |
20100123675 | Ippel | May 2010 | A1 |
20100127366 | Bond et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100176823 | Thompson et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100176892 | Thompson et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100177940 | Thompson et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100180136 | Thompson et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100189314 | Benkley et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100208953 | Gardner et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100244166 | Shibuta et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100253879 | Hirai et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100272329 | Benkley | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100284565 | Benkley et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110002461 | Erhart et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110018556 | Le et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110032205 | David | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110102346 | Orsley et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110102567 | Erhart | May 2011 | A1 |
20110102569 | Erhart | May 2011 | A1 |
20110165393 | Bayne et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110182486 | Valfridsson et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110214924 | Perezselsky et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110267298 | Erhart et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110298711 | Dean et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110304001 | Erhart et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120242635 | Erhart et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20130004695 | Kim et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130108124 | Wickboldt et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2213813 | Oct 1973 | DE |
0929028 | Jan 1998 | EP |
0905646 | Mar 1999 | EP |
0973123 | Jan 2000 | EP |
1018697 | Jul 2000 | EP |
1139301 | Oct 2001 | EP |
1531419 | May 2005 | EP |
1533759 | May 2005 | EP |
1538548 | Jun 2005 | EP |
1624399 | Feb 2006 | EP |
1939788 | Jul 2008 | EP |
2331613 | May 1999 | GB |
2480919 | Dec 2011 | GB |
2490593 | Nov 2012 | GB |
2496055 | May 2013 | GB |
04158434 | Jun 1992 | JP |
2005242856 | Sep 2005 | JP |
2010103240 | Jun 2010 | JP |
WO 9003620 | Apr 1990 | WO |
WO 9858342 | Dec 1998 | WO |
WO 9928701 | Jun 1999 | WO |
WO 9943258 | Sep 1999 | WO |
WO 0122349 | Mar 2001 | WO |
WO 0194902 | Dec 2001 | WO |
WO 0194902 | Dec 2001 | WO |
WO 0195304 | Dec 2001 | WO |
WO 0211066 | Feb 2002 | WO |
WO 0247018 | Jun 2002 | WO |
WO 0247018 | Jun 2002 | WO |
WO 02061668 | Aug 2002 | WO |
WO 02077907 | Oct 2002 | WO |
WO 02093239 | Nov 2002 | WO |
WO 02099520 | Dec 2002 | WO |
WO 03063054 | Jul 2003 | WO |
WO 03075210 | Sep 2003 | WO |
WO 2004066194 | Aug 2004 | WO |
WO 2004066693 | Aug 2004 | WO |
WO 2005104012 | Nov 2005 | WO |
WO 2005106774 | Nov 2005 | WO |
WO 2005106774 | Nov 2005 | WO |
WO 2006040724 | Apr 2006 | WO |
WO 2006041780 | Apr 2006 | WO |
WO 2007011607 | Jan 2007 | WO |
2007089054 | Aug 2007 | WO |
WO 2008033264 | Mar 2008 | WO |
WO 2008033264 | Mar 2008 | WO |
WO 2008033265 | Jun 2008 | WO |
WO 2008033265 | Jun 2008 | WO |
WO 2008137287 | Nov 2008 | WO |
WO 2009002599 | Dec 2008 | WO |
WO 2009002599 | Dec 2008 | WO |
WO 2009029257 | Jun 2009 | WO |
WO 2009079219 | Jun 2009 | WO |
WO 2009079221 | Jun 2009 | WO |
WO 2009079257 | Jun 2009 | WO |
WO 2009079262 | Jun 2009 | WO |
WO 2010034036 | Mar 2010 | WO |
WO 2010036445 | Apr 2010 | WO |
WO 2010143597 | Dec 2010 | WO |
WO 2011053797 | May 2011 | WO |
WO 2011126262 | Oct 2011 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Matsumoto et al., Impact of Artificial “Gummy” Fingers on Fingerprint Systems, SPIE 4677 (2002), reprinted from cryptome.org. |
Maltoni, “Handbook of Fingerprint Recognition”, XP002355942 Springer, New York, USA, Jun. 2003 (Jun. 2003) pp. 65-69. |
Vermasan, et al., “A500 dpi AC Capacitive Hybrid Flip-Chip CMOS ASIC/Sensor Module for Fingerprint, Navigation, and Pointer Detection With On-Chip Data Processing”, IEEE Journal of Solid State Circuits, vol. 38, No. 12, Dec. 2003, pp. 2288-2294. |
Ratha, et al. “Adaptive Flow Orientation Based Feature Extraction in Fingerprint Images,” Pattern Recognition, vol. 28 No. 11, 1657-1672, Nov. 1995. |
Ratha, et al., “A Real Time Matching System for Large Fingerprint Databases,” IEEE, Aug. 1996. |
Suh, et al., “Design and Implementation of the AEGIS Single-Chip Secure Processor Using Physical Random Functions”, Computer Architecture, 2005, ISCA '05, Proceedings, 32nd International Symposium, Jun. 2005 (MIT Technical Report CSAIL CSG-TR-843, 2004. |
Rivest, et al., “A Method for Obtaining Digital Signatures and Public-Key Cryptosystems”, Communication of the ACM, vol. 21 (2), pp. 120-126. (1978). |
Hiltgen, et al., “Secure Internet Banking Authentication”, IEEE Security and Privacy, IEEE Computer Society, New York, NY, US, Mar. 1, 2006 (Mar. 1, 2006), pp. 24-31, XP007908655, ISSN: 1540-7993. |
Hegt, “Analysis of Current and Future Phishing Attacks on Internet Banking Services”, Mater Thesis. Techische Universiteit Eindhoven—Department of Mathematics and Computer Science May 31, 2008 (May 31, 2008), pp. 1-149, XP002630374, Retrieved from the Internet: URL:http://alexandria.tue.nl/extral/afstversl/wsk-i/hgt2008.pdf [retrieved on Mar. 29, 2011] *pp. 127-134, paragraph 6.2*. |
Gassend, et al., “Controlled Physical Random Functions”, In Proceedings of the 18th Annual Computer Security Conference, Las Vegas, Nevada, Dec. 12, 2002. |
bellagiodesigns.com (Internet Archive Wayback Machine, www.bellagiodesigns.com date: Oct. 29, 2005). |
German Patent Office, Office Action in Application No. 10 2013 000 218.4, mailed Feb. 13, 2015. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130169590 A1 | Jul 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61582660 | Jan 2012 | US |