Structures and manufacturing methods for glass covered electronic devices

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 9785299
  • Patent Number
    9,785,299
  • Date Filed
    Wednesday, December 26, 2012
    11 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, October 10, 2017
    6 years ago
Abstract
The disclosure is directed to electronic device displays which are constructed to withstand damage from an impact resistance test wherein a steel ball of 2 g having a diameter of 8 mm is dropped from a designated height greater than 1 ft, more preferably greater than 2 ft, even more preferably greater than 3 ft, still even more preferably greater than 4 ft, yet even more preferably greater than 5 ft and even more preferably greater than 6 ft. The displays are configured using, for example, ultrathin glass adhered to a base glass, wherein the adhesive layer is optimized for thinness and stiffness.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

A variety of electronic displays are used with electronic devices. Displays can operate using either emissive (pixels generate light), transmissive (light transmitted through pixels) and reflective (ambient light reflected) approaches. Display types may include, for example, liquid crystal displays (LCDs) which use liquid crystal cells that change transmission, or reflection in an applied electric field, organic light emitting diode (OLED) devices which utilize a light emitting diode (LED) in which an emissive electroluminescent film of organic compounds emits light in response to an electric current, and different types of electrophoretic displays in which pigmented particles are moved in response to an electric field (e.g. Gyricon, E-ink, etc.).


The LCD panel typically consists of two sheets of glass separated by a sealed-in liquid crystal material. Both sheets have a thin transparent coating of conducting material, with the viewing side etched into segments with leads going to the edge of the display. Voltages applied between the front and back coatings disrupt the orderly arrangement of the molecules sufficiently to darken the liquid and form visible patterns.


Additionally, displays have been developed that can detect the presence and location of touch, e.g., by a finger, or passive object such as a stylus or digital pen, are commonly referred to as touch screens. Touch screens have become a component of many computer and electronic devices. Many LCD displays are manufactured to include touch screen functionality. Touch screens can be attached or incorporated into to computers, networks, mobile telephones, video games, personal digital assistants (PDA), tablets, or any digital device. A variety of technologies are currently used to produce a device with touch screen capabilities. Technologies that enable touch screen functionality include: resistive touch screen panels; surface acoustic wave technology; capacitive sensing panels (e.g., using surface capacitance technology or projective capacitive touch technology, which uses either mutual capacitive sensors or self-capacitive sensors); infrared; optical imaging; dispersive signal technology; and acoustic pulse recognition. Touch screen functionality can be combined with a display in a device in many configurations. The touch screen sensing circuits can be incorporated directly in or on the layers of the display (using, for example, “in-cell” or “on-cell” approaches), built on a separate substrate which is laminated onto the display (e.g., using an “out-cell” approach), or laminated on a cover lens which protects the display in the device, or the sensing circuits can be incorporated directly on the back-side of this cover lens (“Touch-on-Lens”). See, for example, US2011/01025678A1 to Erhart published May 5, 2011, US2011/0102569A1 to Erhart published May 5, 2011, US 2011/0267298A1 to Erhart published Nov. 3, 2011, and US2012/0242635A1 to Erhart published Sep. 27, 2012.


As will be appreciated by those skilled in the art, electronic devices can be configured to include a variety of components and features including: a display, a touch screen, a scratch-resistant cover (e.g., lens), storage, a system on a chip, a CPU core, a GPU core, memory, Wi-Fi connectivity (e.g., 902.11 b.g), Bluetooth connectivity (e.g., USB connector), camera, audio, battery (e.g., built-in, rechargeable lithium-ion polymer battery), power connector, computer readable media, instructions capable of being performed by computer readable media (e.g., software), etc.


One drawback of currently available electronic device interfaces is that the screen can be damaged fairly easily. This can be particularly problematic for devices that are designed for increased mobility and may be subjected to harsh conditions. Currently, devices having an interface are manufactured to withstand a drop of ˜1 foot. As will be appreciated, portable devices such as smart phones, touch pads, and other devices having currently available interfaces may often be deployed in environments where the device will be subjected to physical trauma, such as having a user drop the device from a height greater than 1 foot or having a heavy object fall on the device What is needed, therefore, is a device interface that can withstand the force of an impact equivalent to an impact resistance drop test performed at a height greater than 1 foot, more preferably, greater than 4 feet and even more preferably greater than 6 feet.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

An aspect of the disclosure is directed to electronic device displays, methods of making the displays, and methods of using devices with the displays. Displays are formed from a thin glass (e.g., 30 um to 200 um in thickness), an adhesive (having a thickness d and a hardness K or Ym), and a base glass having a thickness of from 0.1 mm to 0.5 mm or greater. Either, neither or both the thin glass and base glass can be chemically strengthened. The total thickness of the adhesive layer between the thin glass and the base glass is preferably about 8-mil (200 um) or less, more preferably about 4-mil (100 um) or less, and even more preferably 3-mil (75 um or less) in thickness. Additionally, the modulus of the adhesive layer between the thin glass and the base glass has a modulus, when averaged by their thickness, of 1 GPa or greater, more preferably 2 GPa or greater, and even more preferably 3 GPa or greater.


Another aspect of the disclosure is directed to electronic device displays with sensors and methods of making the displays. Electronic device displays include, for example, a thin glass layer, a clear adhesive layer, a sensor layer, a plastic film layer, a second clear adhesive layer, and a base glass layer. Either, neither or both the thin glass and base glass can be chemically strengthened. The total thickness of the one or more adhesive layers is preferably about 8-mil (200 um) or less, more preferably about 4-mil (100 um) or less, and even more preferably 3-mil (75 um or less) in thickness. Additionally, the average modulus of the one or more adhesive layers between the thin glass and the base glass has a modulus, when averaged by their thickness, of 1 GPa or greater, more preferably 2 GPa or greater, and even more preferably 3 GPa or greater.


Still another aspect of the disclosure is directed to electronic device displays with sensors and methods of making the displays. Electronic device displays include, for example, a thin glass layer, a clear adhesive layer, a sensor layer, a second thin glass layer, a second clear adhesive layer, and a base glass layer. The total thickness of the one or more adhesive layers is preferably about 8-mil (200 um) or less, more preferably about 4-mil (100 um) or less, and even more preferably 3-mil (75 um or less) in thickness. Additionally, the average modulus of the one or more adhesive layers between the thin glass and the base glass has a modulus, when averaged by their thickness, of 1 GPa or greater, more preferably 2 GPa or greater, and even more preferably 3 GPa or greater.


Yet another aspect of the disclosure is directed to electronic device displays which are constructed to withstand damage from a force equivalent to an impact resistance test wherein a steel ball of 2 g having a diameter of 8 mm is dropped from a designated height greater than 1 foot, more preferably greater than 2 foot, even more preferably greater than 3 foot, still even more preferably greater than 4 foot, yet even more preferably greater than 5 foot and even more preferably greater than 6 foot.


Yet another aspect of the disclosure is directed to electronic device displays which are constructed to withstand damage from a force equivalent to an impact resistance test wherein a steel ball of 130 g (+/−5 g) having a diameter of 31.8 mm (+/−1 mm) is dropped from a designated height greater than 1 foot, more preferably greater than 2 foot, even more preferably greater than 3 foot, still even more preferably greater than 4 foot.


Still another aspect of the disclosure is directed to an electronic display device that uses a transparent flex which can incorporate a wide variety of electronics into the display thereby creating a smart piece of glass.


An aspect of the disclosure is directed to impact resistant display devices. The impact resistant display devices comprise: a first thin glass layer having a thickness less than 400 micrometers; a second base glass layer having a thickness of from 0.1 to 0.5 mm; an adhesive layer positionable between the first thin glass layer and the second base glass layer having a thickness of 200 micrometers or less wherein the adhesive layer is selected based on one or more of a GPa measurement and a Young's Modulus measurement for the adhesive; and a sensor layer positioned between the first thin glass layer and the second base glass layer dimensioned to cover at least a portion of the height and width of the first thin glass layer or the second glass layer wherein the sensor layer is adaptable to communicate with a printed circuit board, wherein the display device has a total thickness of less than 800 micrometers and is constructed to pass a ball drop test of 2 grams at greater than 4 feet. In some configurations, a second thin glass layer is provided, wherein the sensor layer is positioned between the first thin glass layer and the second thin glass layer. Additionally, a plastic layer and a second adhesive layer can be provided, wherein the plastic layer and the second adhesive layer are positioned between the first thin glass layer and the second glass layer such that the two adhesive layers are not adjacent. The thickness-averaged modulus of the first adhesive layer, the second adhesive layer and the plastic layer is, in at least some configurations, greater than 1 GPa. Additionally, one or more of a coating, a plastic film, an ink layer, an anti-fingerprint layer, and a scratch-resistant layer can be provided. In still other configurations, the interface is in communication with a one or more of a printed circuit board, storage, memory, a system on a chip, a CPU core, a GPU core, Wi-Fi connectivity, Bluetooth connectivity, camera, audio, battery, power connector, computer readable media, and instructions for operation on computer readable media. The adhesive layer can also be selected such that it comprises several layers of different materials, and the modulus averaged by thickness through the adhesive is greater than 1 GPa. Additionally, the adhesive layer can have a modulus of greater than 1 GPa. In some aspects, the adhesive is optically transparent. Additionally, the sensor layer can further comprise thin patterned conductive traces. Suitable sensors include one or more of each of a touch screen sensor and a biometric sensor, such as a one dimensional or two dimensional fingerprint sensor. In at least some configurations, the thickness of the adhesive layer is a function of the at least one of the modulus GPa value for the adhesive and the Young's Modulus value of the adhesive. An amount of deformation of the first thin glass layer relative to the glass layer can be a function of at least one of a thickness between the first thin glass layer and the second glass layer and at least one of the GPa value for the adhesive and the Young's Modulus value of the adhesive. A second sensor layer can also be provided that is positioned between the first thin glass layer and the second base glass layer dimensioned to cover at least a portion of the height and width of the first thin glass layer or the second glass layer wherein the second sensor layer is adaptable to communicate with a printed circuit board and to operate independently of the first sensor layer.


Still another aspect of the disclosure is directed to impact resistant display devices. The impact resistant display devices comprise: a first thin glass layer having a thickness less than 400 micrometers; a second base glass layer having a thickness of from 0.1 to 0.5 mm; an adhesive layer positionable between the first thin glass layer and the second base glass layer having a thickness of 200 micrometers or less wherein the adhesive layer is selected based on one or more of a GPa measurement and a Young's Modulus measurement for the adhesive; and a sensor layer positioned between the first thin glass layer and the second base glass layer dimensioned to cover at least a portion of the height and width of the first thin glass layer or the second glass layer wherein the sensor layer is adaptable to communicate with a printed circuit board, wherein the display device has a total thickness of less than 1100 micrometers and is constructed to pass a ball drop test of 2 grams at greater than 4 feet.


Another aspect of the disclosure is directed to a method for making an impact resistant display device. The method comprises the steps of: providing a first thin glass layer having a thickness less than 400 micrometers, an adhesive layer having a thickness of from 0.01 to 0.4 mm and a second base glass layer having a thickness of from 0.1 to 0.5 mm; providing a sensor layer dimensioned to cover at least a portion of the height and width of the first thin glass layer or the second base glass layer; forming the adhesive layer on a surface the thin glass layer; placing the second base glass layer on the adhesive layer, wherein the display device is less than 800 micrometers in thickness and is constructed to pass a ball drop test of 2 grams at greater than 4 feet. Additional steps include, for example, applying a sheet of plastic to the sensor layer. The thin sheet of plastic can also have a conductive traces patterned on one or both sides. Additionally, a second thin glass layer wherein the sensor layer is positioned between the first thin glass layer and the second thin glass layer. An additional step can include providing a second sensor layer dimensioned to cover at least a portion of a height and width of the first thin glass layer or the second base glass layer.


Another aspect of the disclosure is directed to a method for making an impact resistant display device. The method comprises the steps of: providing a first thin glass layer having a thickness less than 400 micrometers, an adhesive layer having a thickness of from 0.01 to 0.4 mm and a second base glass layer having a thickness of from 0.1 to 0.5 mm; providing a sensor layer dimensioned to cover at least a portion of the height and width of the first thin glass layer or the second base glass layer; forming the adhesive layer on a surface the thin glass layer; placing the second base glass layer on the adhesive layer, wherein the display device is less than 1100 micrometers in thickness and is constructed to pass a ball drop test of 2 grams at greater than 4 feet.


INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE

All publications, patents, and patent applications mentioned in this specification are herein incorporated by reference to the same extent as if each individual publication, patent, or patent application was specifically and individually indicated to be incorporated by reference.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The novel features of the invention are set forth with particularity in the appended claims. A better understanding of the features and advantages of the present invention will be obtained by reference to the following detailed description that sets forth illustrative embodiments, in which the principles of the invention are utilized, and the accompanying drawings of which:



FIG. 1 is a top view of an exemplar electronic device having a display such as those currently available;



FIG. 2 is a side view of an exemplar electronic device having a display such as those currently available;



FIG. 3 is an illustration of a basic construction of an exemplar interface, such as a touch screen used with a smart phone, which uses a glass cover lens;



FIGS. 4A-B are illustrations of a construction of a cover lens assembly which incorporates a capacitive sensor near the surface where thin glass is also incorporated;



FIGS. 5A-B are illustrations of a cover lens assembly with thin glass as a top surface layer;



FIGS. 6A-B are images of the failure height of the STR® 15420P at 1 foot (FIG. 6A) and the DuPont PV5412 at 6.5 feet (FIG. 6A); FIG. 6C is a chart showing the height at which the failure occurred during the impact resistance testing for the STR EVA 15420P˜400 um, and the DuPont PV5412˜380 um; and



FIG. 7A illustrates impact test results using showing failure distance in inches vs. optically-clear adhesive (OCA) thickness; FIG. 7B illustrates impact test results showing failure distance vs. OCA thickness.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

I. Devices


For purposes of illustration a touch screen display currently employed by, for example, a smart phone is described. Such a touch screen typically comprises a 9 cm (3.5 in)×6 cm (2.4 in) liquid crystal display (LCD) with a scratch-resistant glass layer. Other size touch screens can be employed without departing from the scope of the disclosure.


The capacitive touch screen of the LCD is typically optimized for a bare finger, or multiple finger multi-touch, sensing. However, as will be appreciated by those skilled in the art, a variety displays as well as a variety of touch screen configurations and touch screen operated devices can be used without departing from the scope of the disclosure.


An LCD touch screen typically is an assembly that includes an LCD, a printed circuit board (PCB) on which input-output (I/O) connections and integrated circuits (ICs) performing various functions are mounted, a transparent touch screen circuit pattern on a transparent substrate, and a protective shield or coating applied on top of the touch screen circuitry.


The touch screen circuitry is connected along with the LCD display to the PCB. The touch screen circuitry is typically incorporated into the assembly using one of two methods. In a first method, the touch screen circuitry is incorporated directly into or onto the LCD, then a protective shield or coating (e.g. cover lens) is located above the LCD/Touch screen combination. In a second method, the touch screen circuitry is applied onto the protective coating or shield (e.g. cover lens) and then the resulting structure is mounted above the LCD, with the touch screen circuitry mounted between the protective coating or shield and the LCD. In all cased the PCB is located below the LCD, out of view.



FIG. 1 is an electronic device 100 from a top or upper surface view. The device is any suitable electronic device, such as a smart phone, having a device or display interface 120 which a user engages with their finger. Depending upon the nature of the device and display used, the interface 120 can further be comprised of a plurality of parts, as discussed in further detail below.


The device itself has a top surface 102 and a bottom surface 104. Moreover, each component of the device 100 has an upper surface (i.e. a surface that faces the top surface of the device) and a lower surface (i.e. a surface that faces the bottom surface of the device) as will be appreciated from the cross-sectional views. The housing 110 of the electronic device 100 can be configured to form a bezel or rim 112 which secures the interface 120 within the housing 110 of the device 100. A mask 124, such as an ink mask, can be provided which frames at least part of the interface 120. The mask 124 is typically positioned such that it obscures device electronics located within the housing under a portion of the interface 120. For a touch screen enabled interface, a portion of the interface 120 that is not covered by mask 124 has a plurality of touch screen sensors 134. The plurality of touch screen sensors 134 can be any suitable conductor, including a transparent conductor, for example, from a layer of patterned indium tin oxide (ITO), carbon nanotubes, metal nanowires, conductive polymers or fine metal lines (e.g., copper lines). The dimensions of the device interface 120 can be from 3-25 cm width and from 5-30 cm in length.



FIG. 2 is a cross-sectional view of an electronic device 200, such as device 100 of FIG. 1, taken along the lines 2-2 of FIG. 1. FIG. 2 illustrates a common cross-sectional view of a device, including the display. Electronic device 200 includes a housing 210, a printed circuit board (PCB) 230 and a display 228, such as an LCD or LCD module. The device can also include a touch sensor component 235, such as a glass layer, onto which a conductive layer such as indium tin oxide (ITO) or similar materials are applied to form the touch screen circuitry. The conductive layer can be applied such that it forms a pattern on the surface of the glass layer, as will be appreciated by those skilled in the art. As shown in FIG. 2, a first conductive layer 234 covers an upper surface 206 of the touch sensor component 235 and a second conductive layer 234′ covers a lower surface 208 of the touch sensor component 235. The cover lens 238 can be formed from suitable material including, for example, a chemically hardened glass. A touch circuit controller 226 is coupled to a touch screen circuit or digitizer which can be formed from conductive layers 234, 234′ of the touch circuit component 235 via a flexible circuit 232. The controller 226 is mountable on the PCB 230. A display 228 is positioned below the cover lens 238 and above the PCB 230. As will be appreciated by those skilled in the art, devices can also be configured such that part of the control functions are incorporated into a chip on the flex (COF) itself. The display 228 can include, for example, a glass layer as well as any other components required to achieve a functional display including logic devices. The protective layer 222 and display layer 228 can be formed from any suitable non-conductive material (e.g., glass, PET or a suitable hard coating).


Turning now to FIG. 3, a basic construction of a touch screen suitable for use with a smart phone or other similar device is shown. The device 300 has a cover lens 338 with a sensor 340 positioned such that it is sensable by an upper surface 302 of the cover lens 338. The cover lens 338 is positioned such that it fits within a housing 310 that contains the remainder of the device components (including the display and electronics, as described above, for example, with respect to FIG. 2).


For various electronic and optical device products, including, but not limited to, capacitive fingerprint sensors, touch sensors and displays, it is desired to incorporate a layer (also referred to as a sheet) of thin glass as discussed below with respect to FIGS. 4-5. This glass may have a thickness of 400 micrometers or less, more specifically between 50 and 400 micrometers in thickness, and in some cases between 30 and 250 micrometers in thickness. Many of these products must be physically robust for their intended use. One test of this physical robustness or durability is to drop a steel ball onto the surface of the device to determine under what conditions (ball drop height, ball weight, substrate mounting, etc.) the product fails. Because of these requirements of durability, thin glass layers have been avoided in the structure of these devices.


In two specific implementations provided for illustration, a capacitive fingerprint sensor and/or a capacitive touch sensor may need to be incorporated into a device which has a display, such as on a touch screen phone. These phones often have a cover lens which is made from a chemically strengthened glass or base glass, typically 0.5 mm thick or thicker. However, as will be appreciated by those skilled in the art, cover lenses having a thickness between 0.3 mm and 0.5 mm, such as an ultrathin glass (UT), can also be used. This cover lens can also have other thin layers such as inks printed on them for visual effects or coatings used to reduce fingerprint smudging or enhance scratch resistance. In this embodiment, the sensors are located close to the finger, in this case within either 50 micrometers, 100 micrometers, or values between 30 micrometers and 300 micrometers. Thus, the sensors can be placed above the cover lens, or incorporated as part of a cover lens assembly. It is desired to place a glass layer above the sensor to retain the feel and many of the properties of the glass surface for the user.


II. Methods of Manufacture


As disclosed here, a method and structure has been developed which enables thin glass to be incorporated into these device products (and similar device products or components thereof) while achieving the durability that is required. Specifically, when this structure is subjected to steel ball impact tests, as discussed below, the results are similar to those obtained for existing commercial cover lenses made from strengthened glass. By providing the thin glass surface at or near the surface of the device product, the results of hardness and scratch resistance may also be similar to that for the existing commercial cover lenses made from strengthened glass.



FIG. 3 shows a basic assembly cross-section of a touch screen phone or similar device. As can be seen, the cover lens 338 is mounted above the display and other device components (shown in FIG. 2), onto the housing 310 (or bezel) of the device 300 has an interior cavity 350 sized to house the electronic components of the device. Typically sensors 340 are positioned at or near a top surface 302 of the cover lens 338.



FIGS. 4A-B show a cover lens assembly in cross-section, which incorporates a base glass layer 438 that may be similar to that used in a typical commercial cover lens construction, but also now incorporates one or more sensors 448 and a thin glass layer 422 above the base glass layer 438. This base glass layer 438 may either be thin (between 30 um and 300 um thickness) or thicker (greater than 300 um up to 5 mm) and preferably strengthened. For all or any of the thin glass layers 422, 422′, and base glass layer 438 in these structures, the glass may or may not be strengthened, although strengthened glass layers may have benefits. Suitable strengthened glass includes, for example, Corning® Gorilla® Glass, available from Corning Incorporated, Corning, N.Y.


In this example, sensors 448 can be made from thin patterned conductive traces on the surface (either top, bottom or both) of a thin sheet of plastic 464. With appropriate patterns and connections, these patterns can comprise, for example, a fingerprint sensor, a touch sensor, or a combination of both, and may or may not be transparent (e.g. could be copper or ITO or a combination of both). This sensor layer may cover the entire area of the cover lens, or only part of the area. There may also be ink patterns 424 printed on the surfaces of one of the glass layers or the plastic sheet, as for example a masking layer typically used in a cell phone. One or more adhesive layers 452, 452′, can be used between and around the different layers to bond the assembly together.


In FIGS. 4A-B optically transparent adhesive(s), or optically clear adhesives (OCA), can be used between a sensor layer and a thin glass layer, and between a sensor and a base glass.


Additionally, a thin glass laminate (having a thickness of from 30-500 micrometers) 422, 422′ can be positioned above and below the sensor 448.



FIGS. 5A-B shows a cross-section of a general concept of a cover lens assembly which incorporates thin glass. The thin glass layer 522 is positioned as a top layer with respect to the adhesive and base glass layer 538. Note that this thin glass 522 could have additional layers on either the top or bottom side (e.g. ink patterns, anti-fingerprint coatings, etc.). Below the thin glass layer 522 is a base glass layer 538 which also may have additional coatings, if desired. This base glass layer 538 is preferably strengthened. This base glass layer 538 may have thicknesses in the range of 100 um to 300 um, or 300 um to 500 um, or be greater than 500 um. An adhesive layer 552 of thickness d and with a hardness given by the Bulk Modulus, K, is used to bond the thin glass layer 522 to the base glass layer 538. It may be desired to also have other layers, device components and devices positioned between the base glass layer 538 and the thin glass layer 522, wherein, for example, by doing so these additional components could be closer to an upper surface 502 than if they were located beneath the base glass.


Additionally, a thin glass laminate (having a thickness of from 30-500 micrometers) 522, 522′ comprised of a first thin glass layer 522 and an second thin glass layer 522′ can be positioned above and below the sensor 548.


One primary problem which this disclosure addresses is that the thin glass layer in assemblies, like the ones illustrated in FIGS. 3 and 4, are normally susceptible to breaking In particular, one way to test the durability of these assemblies is to subject them to ball drop tests to determine impact resistance, wherein a specified steel ball is dropped from successively increasing heights onto the surface of the assembly until breakage occurs. This susceptibility to breaking is solved by providing all the elements between the thin glass and base glass as being below a certain thickness, and having hardnesses above certain values. During a ball drop test, when the ball impacts the front surface, the thin glass layer may deflect locally toward conforming to the radius of the ball. In doing so, local stresses occur in this region which can result in the formation of a crack. The deformation of the thin glass layer can be reduced by increasing the hardnesses of the materials between the thin glass layer and the base glass layer. It also can be reduced by reducing the thickness of the space between the thin glass layer and the base glass layer. By choosing an appropriate combination of thicknesses and hardnesses, breakage of the thin glass layer due to impact, particularly due to ball drop testing, can be reduced or eliminated to the point where the overall breakage of the cover glass assembly is the same as a typical commercial assembly based on the strengthened glass. This is supported by the attached figures, data.


As will be appreciated by those skilled in the art, hardness can be defined many ways. The Bulk Elastic Modulus, K, is an example of a suitable measurement. However, this value is not always readily available, but for many of the materials of interest the Young's Modulus, YM, can be used as a substitute as it is often measured.


The configurations of this disclosure utilize a total thickness of the layers between the thin glass layer and base glass layer of about 8-mil (200 um) or less, more specifically 4-mil (100 um) or less, and even more specifically 3-mil (75 um or less) in thickness. Additionally, the modulus of these middle layers, averaged by their thicknesses, is 1 GPa or greater. When much of this thickness is defined by the adhesive thickness, the adhesive will be one of a high hardness.













TABLE 1







Device Component
From
To




















Interface Thickness (mm)
0.013
0.075



Adhesive Layer Thickness (mm)
0.025
0.200



Modulus of Middle Layers (Ym, GPa)
0.5
5










Types of adhesives that are included are polyester-based resins, acrylic-based resins and polycarbonate-based resins.













TABLE 2







Material
Ym
PSI









Glass
 ~50 GPa
~7 × 106



PET*
~3.5 GPa
~5 × 105



EVA**
 ~70 uPa
~1,000-10,000







*Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET)



**Ethelyne Vinyl Acetate (EVA)






The device interfaces disclosed herein achieve an increased durability and performance of the electronic device interface by optimizing the thickness of the adhesive layer and the hardness.


The cover lens assemblies can be fabricated using a variety of processes, which depend critically on the type of adhesive being used. In general, the stack of layers are built-up sequentially by applying each layer on top of the other. This can happen in whichever order is appropriate for the desired handling of materials and schedule of applying process conditions such as heating, exposure to UV or applying pressure.


In one example, thermoforming and thermosetting adhesives are used, which are supplied as thin dry sheets. For these materials the full assembly is stacked up, which includes (by illustration of FIG. 5) the base glass layer 538, adhesive layer 552 and a thin glass layer 522. This stack of material is placed in a vacuum laminator and undergoes a series of process steps which include evacuation of surrounding air (to eliminate trapped air between layers), heating, application of pressure, and cooling. Timing and sequence of these steps can be optimized to improve the desired properties of, for example, optical clarity, smoothness, uniformity, hardness and adhesion. Example assemblies which include the adhesives of EVA and DuPont's PV5412 have been assembled utilizing such a process.


In another example, optically clear pressure sensitive adhesive (PSA) films, commonly referred to as optically clear adhesives (OCAs), are used. When using these adhesives, lamination is done by applying the film(s) with a roller laminator which applies pressure as the films are laminated. Heat may also be applied either during or after the physical lamination. The sequence of assembly may vary depending on many factors of material handling. In one example for these materials (by illustration of FIGS. 5A-B), the adhesive layer 552 is first applied to the base glass layer 538, then the thin glass layer 522 is applied to the stack of adhesive and base glass layer. In an alternative example for these materials, the adhesive layer 552 is first applied to the thin glass layer 522, thereafter the combination of the thin glass layer and adhesive layer are applied to the base glass layer 538. Following either of these lamination approaches, heat and/or pressure can be applied to accelerate bonding at the interfaces.


Other adhesives may include liquid epoxies. These may be applied as layers using a variety of coating methods including spray, gravure, slot, dispense, spin methods. Once the stack of layers to be bonded by the epoxy are formed, the epoxy may be hardened and cured using heat and/or exposure to UV radiation.


III. Methods of Use


An electronic device 100 configurable to position a sensor, such as a 1D sensor, a 2D sensor or a touch sensor, within sensing region is deployed by a user. The user applies and/or swipes his or her finger, or applies the element to be sensed, to a surface of the device in a position in communication with the sensor.


For example, the element to be sensed (such as a finger) can be applied (e.g., by swiping across the surface) in a position that is in communication with the sensing element. Thus, for example, the fingerprint is sensed by the fingerprint sensor and/or biometric input is received. The sensed input (such as a fingerprint) is validated. Once validated, use of the electronic device 100 is permitted or other functionality controlled by the fingerprint authentication is permitted.


As will be appreciated by those skilled in the art, the sensors disclosed can be used in a variety of ways including, for example:

    • User authentication for device (e.g., phone, tablet, or computer) unlocking
    • User authentication for online transactions
    • User authentication for access to device systems and services, including websites and email
    • Replacement of Password and PINs
    • Physical access such as door locks
    • Time and attendance systems (prove you were at a certain place at a certain time)
    • Finger-based input devices/navigation for mobile phones and gaming
    • Finger-based shortcuts (authentication of a given finger results in the corresponding action to which that finger is mapped)
    • Non-repudiation for online transactions


IV. Examples

Impact Resistance Test: STR® 15420P vs. DuPont® PV5412


The object of this test was to measure the difference between STR Photocap® 15420P EVA thermal adhesive (˜400 um), available from Specialized Technology Resources, Inc. (www.strsolar.com, Enfield, Conn.), and DuPont® PV5412 thermal adhesive (380 um), available from DuPont Photovoltaic Solutions (www2.dupont.com/photovoltaics/en_US/products_services!), via an Impact Resistance Test. To achieve this, a 2 g steel ball with a diameter of 8 mm was dropped from a designated height five times. The drop height was increased until failure occurred. The test package consisted of: glass, thermal adhesive, thin glass. A substantial difference was measured between the two thermal adhesives, the DuPont PV5412 adhesive increased impact strength over the STR EVA material. The impact resistance improvement is attributed to the greater hardness of the Dupont PV5412 material. FIG. 6A illustrates an image of the device interface after the impact resistance test failure for 15420P at 1 foot, and FIG. 6B illustrates an image of the device interface after the impact resistance test failure for the DuPont PV5412 at 6.5 feet. The breakage of the ultrathin (UT) glass for the standard configuration was due to too much deflection during impact which causes a tensile break. The PV 5412 material (FIG. 6B) reduced deflection by using an adhesive layer that is harder than that of the EVA material. The DuPont® PV5412 is expected to have a Young's Modulus above 1 GPa, while the STR Photocap® 15420P EVA is expected to have a Young's Modulus in a range below 0.1 GPa. FIG. 6C is a chart illustrating the relative impact resistance test results and the height at which failure occurred for the materials shown in FIGS. 6A-B.



FIG. 7A illustrates impact test results using an OCA (available from 3M Company, St. Paul, Minn., such as OCA 8173, 8211, 8212, 8213, 8214, or 8215) which comprises the following layers: glass-OCA-ultrathin glass (UT). Failure distance (in inches) are provided for configurations having an OCA thickness of 1 mil-6 mil. Failure distances were well above 1 foot, and typically 4 feet (48 inches) or above.



FIG. 7B illustrates impact test results using an OCA (available from 3M Company, such as OCA 8173, 8211, 8212, 8213, 8214, or 8215) which comprises a multi-layered structure having the following layers: glass-OCA-2 mil PET-OCA-UT. Failure distance (in inches) is provided for configurations having an OCA thickness of 1 mil-2 mil. Failure distance was 5 feet (60 inches) or above.


While preferred embodiments of the present invention have been shown and described herein, it will be obvious to those skilled in the art that such embodiments are provided by way of example only. Numerous variations, changes, and substitutions will now occur to those skilled in the art without departing from the invention. It should be understood that various alternatives to the embodiments of the invention described herein may be employed in practicing the invention. It is intended that the following claims define the scope of the invention and that methods and structures within the scope of these claims and their equivalents be covered thereby.

Claims
  • 1. An impact resistant display device comprising: a first thin glass layer having a thickness less than 400 micrometers;a second base glass layer having a thickness of from 0.1 to 0.5 mm;an adhesive layer positionable between the first thin glass layer and the second base glass layer having a thickness of 200 micrometers or less, wherein the adhesive layer is selected based on one or more of a GPa measurement and a Young's Modulus measurement for the adhesive layer; anda sensor layer positioned between the first thin glass layer and the second base glass layer dimensioned to cover at least a portion of a height and width of the first thin glass layer or the second base glass layer wherein the sensor layer is adaptable to communicate with a printed circuit board,wherein the impact resistant display device has a total thickness of less than 800 micrometers and is constructed to pass a ball drop test of 2 grams at greater than 4 feet,wherein an element to be sensed is capable of being applied and/or swiped on the first thin glass layer, wherein the element to be sensed comprises a finger of a user, andwherein the adhesive layer comprises several layers of different materials, and a modulus averaged by thickness through the several layers is greater than 1 GPa.
  • 2. The impact resistant display device of claim 1 further comprising a second thin glass layer wherein the sensor layer is positioned between the first thin glass layer and the second thin glass layer.
  • 3. The impact resistant display device of claim 1 further comprising a plastic layer and a second adhesive layer, wherein the plastic layer and the second adhesive layer are positioned between the first thin glass layer and the second base glass layer such that the adhesive layer and the second adhesive layer are not adjacent.
  • 4. The impact resistant display device of claim 3 wherein a thickness-averaged modulus of the adhesive layer, the second adhesive layer and the plastic layer is greater than 1 GPa.
  • 5. The impact resistant display device of claim 1 further comprising one or more of a coating, a plastic film, an ink layer, an anti-fingerprint layer, and a scratch-resistant layer.
  • 6. An impact resistant display device, comprising: a first thin glass layer having a thickness less than 400 micrometers;a second base glass layer having a thickness of from 0.1 to 0.5 mm;an adhesive layer positionable between the first thin glass layer and the second base glass layer having a thickness of 200 micrometers or less, wherein the adhesive layer is selected based on one or more of a GPa measurement and a Young's Modulus measurement for the adhesive layer; anda sensor layer positioned between the first thin glass layer and the second base glass layer dimensioned to cover at least a portion of a height and width of the first thin glass layer or the second base glass layer wherein the sensor layer is adaptable to communicate with a printed circuit board,wherein the impact resistant display device has a total thickness of less than 800 micrometers and is constructed to pass a ball drop test of 2 grams at greater than 4 feet,wherein an element to be sensed is capable of being applied and/or swiped on the first thin glass layer, wherein the element to be sensed comprises a finger of a user, andwherein the adhesive layer comprises several layers of different materials, and a modulus averaged by thickness through the several layers is greater than 1 GPa.
  • 7. The impact resistant display device of claim 1 wherein the adhesive layer is optically transparent.
  • 8. The impact resistant display device of claim 1 wherein the sensor layer further comprises thin patterned conductive traces.
  • 9. The impact resistant display device of claim 1 wherein the sensor layer comprises one or more of a touch screen sensor and a biometric sensor.
  • 10. The impact resistant display device of claim 1 wherein the thickness of the adhesive layer is a function of the at least one of the GPa measurement for the adhesive layer and the Young's Modulus measurement of the adhesive layer.
  • 11. The impact resistant display device of claim 1 wherein an amount of deformation of the first thin glass layer relative to the second base glass layer is a function of at least one of a thickness between the first thin glass layer and the second base glass layer and at least one of the GPa measurement for the adhesive layer and the Young's Modulus measurement of the adhesive layer.
  • 12. The impact resistant display device of claim 1 further comprising a second sensor layer positioned between the first thin glass layer and the second base glass layer dimensioned to cover at least a portion of the height and width of the first thin glass layer or the second base glass layer, wherein the second sensor layer is adaptable to communicate with a printed circuit board and to operate independently of the sensor layer.
  • 13. The impact resistant display device of claim 1, wherein the impact resistant display device is configured to be mounted over a liquid crystal display (LCD).
  • 14. The impact resistant display device of claim 1, wherein the adhesive layer bonds the first thin glass layer to the second base glass layer.
  • 15. The impact resistant display device of claim 1, wherein the adhesive layer is bonded to a lower surface of the first thin glass layer, wherein the finger is capable of being applied and/or swiped on an upper surface of the first thin glass layer.
  • 16. The impact resistant display device of claim 1, wherein the sensor layer comprises a capacitive fingerprint sensor.
  • 17. The impact resistant display device of claim 1, wherein the adhesive layer bonds the first thin glass layer to the second base glass layer, wherein the adhesive layer is bonded to a lower surface of the first thin glass layer, wherein the sensor layer comprises a capacitive fingerprint sensor configured to capture a fingerprint applied and/or swiped on an upper surface of the first thin glass layer, and wherein the impact resistant display device is mounted over a liquid crystal display (LCD).
CROSS-REFERENCE

This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/582,660, entitled Structure and Manufacturing Methods for Glass Covered Electronic Device by Paul Wickboldt and Eric Jones, filed Jan. 3, 2012, which application is incorporated herein by reference.

US Referenced Citations (351)
Number Name Date Kind
4151512 Riganati et al. Apr 1979 A
4225850 Chang et al. Sep 1980 A
4310827 Asi Jan 1982 A
4353056 Tsikos Oct 1982 A
4405829 Rivest et al. Sep 1983 A
4525859 Bowles et al. Jun 1985 A
4550221 Mabusth Oct 1985 A
4580790 Doose Apr 1986 A
4758622 Gosselin Jul 1988 A
4817183 Sparrow Mar 1989 A
5076566 Kriegel Dec 1991 A
5109427 Yang Apr 1992 A
5140642 Hsu et al. Aug 1992 A
5305017 Gerpheide Apr 1994 A
5319323 Fong Jun 1994 A
5325442 Knapp Jun 1994 A
5420936 Fitzpatrick et al. May 1995 A
5422807 Mitra et al. Jun 1995 A
5456256 Schneider et al. Oct 1995 A
5543591 Gillespie et al. Aug 1996 A
5569901 Bridgelall et al. Oct 1996 A
5623552 Lane Apr 1997 A
5627316 De Winter et al. May 1997 A
5650842 Maase et al. Jul 1997 A
5717777 Wong et al. Feb 1998 A
5781651 Hsiao et al. Jul 1998 A
5801681 Sayag Sep 1998 A
5818956 Tuli Oct 1998 A
5838306 O'Connor Nov 1998 A
5848176 Harra et al. Dec 1998 A
5850450 Schweitzer et al. Dec 1998 A
5852670 Setlak et al. Dec 1998 A
5864296 Upton Jan 1999 A
5887343 Salatino et al. Mar 1999 A
5892824 Beatson et al. Apr 1999 A
5903225 Schmitt et al. May 1999 A
5915757 Tsuyama et al. Jun 1999 A
5920384 Borza Jul 1999 A
5920640 Salatino et al. Jul 1999 A
5940526 Setlak et al. Aug 1999 A
5999637 Toyoda et al. Dec 1999 A
6002815 Immega et al. Dec 1999 A
6016355 Dickinson et al. Jan 2000 A
6052475 Upton Apr 2000 A
6067368 Setlak et al. May 2000 A
6073343 Petrick et al. Jun 2000 A
6076566 Lowe Jun 2000 A
6088585 Schmitt et al. Jul 2000 A
6098175 Lee Aug 2000 A
6134340 Hsu et al. Oct 2000 A
6157722 Lerner et al. Dec 2000 A
6161213 Lofstrom Dec 2000 A
6175407 Santor Jan 2001 B1
6182076 Yu et al. Jan 2001 B1
6182892 Angelo et al. Feb 2001 B1
6185318 Jain et al. Feb 2001 B1
6234031 Suga May 2001 B1
6241288 Bergenek et al. Jun 2001 B1
6259108 Antonelli et al. Jul 2001 B1
6289114 Mainguet Sep 2001 B1
6317508 Kramer et al. Nov 2001 B1
6320394 Tartagni Nov 2001 B1
6332193 Glass et al. Dec 2001 B1
6333989 Borza Dec 2001 B1
6337919 Dunton Jan 2002 B1
6346739 Lepert et al. Feb 2002 B1
6347040 Fries et al. Feb 2002 B1
6360004 Akizuki Mar 2002 B1
6362633 Tartagni Mar 2002 B1
6392636 Ferrari et al. May 2002 B1
6399994 Shobu Jun 2002 B2
6400836 Senior Jun 2002 B2
6401551 Kawahara et al. Jun 2002 B1
6408087 Kramer Jun 2002 B1
6473072 Comiskey et al. Oct 2002 B1
6509501 Eicken et al. Jan 2003 B2
6539101 Black Mar 2003 B1
6580816 Kramer et al. Jun 2003 B2
6597289 Sabatini Jul 2003 B2
6643389 Raynal et al. Nov 2003 B1
6672174 Deconde et al. Jan 2004 B2
6738050 Comiskey et al. May 2004 B2
6741729 Bjorn et al. May 2004 B2
6757002 Oross et al. Jun 2004 B1
6766040 Catalano et al. Jul 2004 B1
6785407 Tschudi et al. Aug 2004 B1
6838905 Doyle Jan 2005 B1
6886104 McClurg et al. Apr 2005 B1
6897002 Teraoka et al. May 2005 B2
6898299 Brooks May 2005 B1
6924496 Manansala Aug 2005 B2
6937748 Schneider et al. Aug 2005 B1
6941001 Bolle et al. Sep 2005 B1
6941810 Okada Sep 2005 B2
6950540 Higuchi Sep 2005 B2
6959874 Bardwell Nov 2005 B2
6963626 Shaeffer et al. Nov 2005 B1
6970584 O'Gorman et al. Nov 2005 B2
6980672 Saito et al. Dec 2005 B2
6983882 Cassone Jan 2006 B2
7013030 Wong et al. Mar 2006 B2
7020591 Wei et al. Mar 2006 B1
7030860 Hsu et al. Apr 2006 B1
7035443 Wong Apr 2006 B2
7042535 Katoh et al. May 2006 B2
7043061 Hamid et al. May 2006 B2
7043644 DeBruine May 2006 B2
7046230 Zadesky et al. May 2006 B2
7064743 Nishikawa Jun 2006 B2
7099496 Benkley Aug 2006 B2
7110577 Tschudi Sep 2006 B1
7113622 Hamid Sep 2006 B2
7126389 McRae et al. Oct 2006 B1
7129926 Mathiassen et al. Oct 2006 B2
7136514 Wong Nov 2006 B1
7146024 Benkley Dec 2006 B2
7146026 Russon et al. Dec 2006 B2
7146029 Manansala Dec 2006 B2
7190816 Mitsuyu et al. Mar 2007 B2
7194392 Tuken et al. Mar 2007 B2
7197168 Russo Mar 2007 B2
7200250 Chou Apr 2007 B2
7251351 Mathiassen et al. Jul 2007 B2
7258279 Schneider et al. Aug 2007 B2
7260246 Fujii Aug 2007 B2
7263212 Kawabe Aug 2007 B2
7263213 Rowe Aug 2007 B2
7289649 Walley et al. Oct 2007 B1
7290323 Deconde et al. Nov 2007 B2
7308121 Mathiassen et al. Dec 2007 B2
7308122 McClurg et al. Dec 2007 B2
7321672 Sasaki et al. Jan 2008 B2
7356169 Hamid Apr 2008 B2
7360688 Harris Apr 2008 B1
7369685 DeLeon May 2008 B2
7379569 Chikazawa et al. May 2008 B2
7409876 Ganapathi et al. Aug 2008 B2
7412083 Takahashi Aug 2008 B2
7424618 Roy et al. Sep 2008 B2
7447339 Mimura et al. Nov 2008 B2
7447911 Chou et al. Nov 2008 B2
7460697 Erhart et al. Dec 2008 B2
7463756 Benkley Dec 2008 B2
7505611 Fyke Mar 2009 B2
7505613 Russo Mar 2009 B2
7565548 Fiske et al. Jul 2009 B2
7574022 Russo Aug 2009 B2
7643950 Getzin et al. Jan 2010 B1
7646897 Fyke Jan 2010 B2
7681232 Nordentoft et al. Mar 2010 B2
7689013 Shinzaki Mar 2010 B2
7706581 Drews et al. Apr 2010 B2
7733697 Picca et al. Jun 2010 B2
7751601 Benkley Jul 2010 B2
7843438 Onoda Nov 2010 B2
7899216 Watanabe et al. Mar 2011 B2
7953258 Dean et al. May 2011 B2
8005276 Dean et al. Aug 2011 B2
8031916 Abiko et al. Oct 2011 B2
8077935 Geoffroy et al. Dec 2011 B2
20010026636 Mainguet Oct 2001 A1
20010030644 Allport Oct 2001 A1
20010036299 Senior Nov 2001 A1
20010043728 Kramer et al. Nov 2001 A1
20020025062 Black Feb 2002 A1
20020061125 Fujii May 2002 A1
20020064892 Lepert et al. May 2002 A1
20020067845 Griffis Jun 2002 A1
20020073046 David Jun 2002 A1
20020089044 Simmons et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020089410 Janiak et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020096731 Wu et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020122026 Bergstrom Sep 2002 A1
20020126516 Jeon Sep 2002 A1
20020133725 Roy et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020181749 Matsumoto et al. Dec 2002 A1
20030002717 Hamid Jan 2003 A1
20030002719 Hamid et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030021495 Cheng Jan 2003 A1
20030035570 Benkley, III Feb 2003 A1
20030063782 Acharya et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030068072 Hamid Apr 2003 A1
20030076301 Tsuk et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030076303 Huppi Apr 2003 A1
20030095096 Robbin et al. May 2003 A1
20030102874 Lane et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030123714 O'Gorman et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030123715 Uchida Jul 2003 A1
20030141959 Keogh et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030147015 Katoh et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030161510 Fuji Aug 2003 A1
20030161512 Mathiassen Aug 2003 A1
20030169228 Mathiassen et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030174256 Kim et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030174871 Yoshioka et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030186157 Teraoka et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030209293 Sako et al. Nov 2003 A1
20030224553 Manansala Dec 2003 A1
20040012773 Puttkammer Jan 2004 A1
20040022001 Chu et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040042642 Bolle et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040050930 Rowe Mar 2004 A1
20040066613 Leitao Apr 2004 A1
20040076313 Bronstein et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040081339 Benkley Apr 2004 A1
20040096086 Miyasaka May 2004 A1
20040113956 Bellwood et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040120400 Linzer Jun 2004 A1
20040125993 Zhao et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040129787 Saito Jul 2004 A1
20040136612 Meister et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040172339 Snelgrove et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040179718 Chou Sep 2004 A1
20040184641 Nagasaka et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040190761 Lee Sep 2004 A1
20040208346 Baharav et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040208347 Baharav et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040208348 Baharav et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040213441 Tschudi Oct 2004 A1
20040215689 Dooley et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040228505 Sugimoto Nov 2004 A1
20040228508 Shigeta Nov 2004 A1
20040240712 Rowe et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040252867 Lan et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050031174 Ryhanen et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050036665 Higuchi Feb 2005 A1
20050047485 Khayrallah et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050100196 Scott et al. May 2005 A1
20050109835 Jacoby et al. May 2005 A1
20050110103 Setlak May 2005 A1
20050111708 Chou May 2005 A1
20050123176 Ishii et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050136200 Durell et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050139656 Arnouse Jun 2005 A1
20050162402 Watanachote Jul 2005 A1
20050169503 Howell et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050210271 Chou et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050219200 Weng Oct 2005 A1
20050220329 Payne et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050231213 Chou et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050238212 Du et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050244038 Benkley Nov 2005 A1
20050244039 Geoffroy et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050249386 Juh Nov 2005 A1
20050258952 Utter et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050269402 Spitzer et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060006224 Modi Jan 2006 A1
20060017862 Song et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060055500 Burke et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060066572 Yumoto et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060078176 Abiko et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060083411 Benkley Apr 2006 A1
20060099411 Xia et al. May 2006 A1
20060110537 Huang et al. May 2006 A1
20060140461 Kim et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060144953 Takao Jul 2006 A1
20060170528 Fukushige et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060187200 Martin Aug 2006 A1
20060210082 Devadas et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060214512 Iwata Sep 2006 A1
20060239514 Watanabe et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060249008 Luther Nov 2006 A1
20060259873 Mister Nov 2006 A1
20060261174 Zellner et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060271793 Devadas et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060287963 Steeves et al. Dec 2006 A1
20070031011 Erhart et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070036400 Watanabe et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070057763 Blattner et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070067828 Bychkov Mar 2007 A1
20070076926 Schneider et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070076951 Tanaka et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070086634 Setlak et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070090312 Stallinga et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070138299 Mitra Jun 2007 A1
20070180261 Akkermans et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070198141 Moore Aug 2007 A1
20070198435 Siegal et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070228154 Tran Oct 2007 A1
20070237366 Maletsky Oct 2007 A1
20070248249 Stoianov Oct 2007 A1
20080002867 Mathiassen et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080013805 Sengupta et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080019578 Saito et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080049987 Champagne et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080049989 Iseri et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080063245 Benkley et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080069412 Champagne et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080126260 Cox et al. May 2008 A1
20080169345 Keane et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080170695 Adler et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080175450 Scott et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080178008 Takahashi et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080179112 Qin et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080185429 Saville Aug 2008 A1
20080201265 Hewton Aug 2008 A1
20080205714 Benkley et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080219521 Benkley et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080222049 Loomis et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080223925 Saito et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080226132 Gardner Sep 2008 A1
20080240523 Benkley et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080244277 Orsini et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080267462 Nelson et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080279373 Erhart et al. Nov 2008 A1
20090130369 Huang et al. May 2009 A1
20090153297 Gardner Jun 2009 A1
20090154779 Satyan et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090155456 Benkley et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090169071 Bond et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090174974 Huang et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090237135 Ramaraju et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090252384 Dean et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090252385 Dean et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090252386 Dean et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090279742 Abiko Nov 2009 A1
20090319435 Little et al. Dec 2009 A1
20090322705 Halsey, IV Dec 2009 A1
20090324028 Russo Dec 2009 A1
20100026451 Erhart et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100045705 Vertegaal et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100083000 Kesanupalli et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100097080 Kobayashi et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100119124 Satyan May 2010 A1
20100123675 Ippel May 2010 A1
20100127366 Bond et al. May 2010 A1
20100176823 Thompson et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100176892 Thompson et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100177940 Thompson et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100180136 Thompson et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100189314 Benkley et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100208953 Gardner et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100244166 Shibuta et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100253879 Hirai et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100272329 Benkley Oct 2010 A1
20100284565 Benkley et al. Nov 2010 A1
20110002461 Erhart et al. Jan 2011 A1
20110018556 Le et al. Jan 2011 A1
20110032205 David Feb 2011 A1
20110102346 Orsley et al. May 2011 A1
20110102567 Erhart May 2011 A1
20110102569 Erhart May 2011 A1
20110165393 Bayne et al. Jul 2011 A1
20110182486 Valfridsson et al. Jul 2011 A1
20110214924 Perezselsky et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110267298 Erhart et al. Nov 2011 A1
20110298711 Dean et al. Dec 2011 A1
20110304001 Erhart et al. Dec 2011 A1
20120242635 Erhart et al. Sep 2012 A1
20130004695 Kim et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130108124 Wickboldt et al. May 2013 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (61)
Number Date Country
2213813 Oct 1973 DE
0929028 Jan 1998 EP
0905646 Mar 1999 EP
0973123 Jan 2000 EP
1018697 Jul 2000 EP
1139301 Oct 2001 EP
1531419 May 2005 EP
1533759 May 2005 EP
1538548 Jun 2005 EP
1624399 Feb 2006 EP
1939788 Jul 2008 EP
2331613 May 1999 GB
2480919 Dec 2011 GB
2490593 Nov 2012 GB
2496055 May 2013 GB
04158434 Jun 1992 JP
2005242856 Sep 2005 JP
2010103240 Jun 2010 JP
WO 9003620 Apr 1990 WO
WO 9858342 Dec 1998 WO
WO 9928701 Jun 1999 WO
WO 9943258 Sep 1999 WO
WO 0122349 Mar 2001 WO
WO 0194902 Dec 2001 WO
WO 0194902 Dec 2001 WO
WO 0195304 Dec 2001 WO
WO 0211066 Feb 2002 WO
WO 0247018 Jun 2002 WO
WO 0247018 Jun 2002 WO
WO 02061668 Aug 2002 WO
WO 02077907 Oct 2002 WO
WO 02093239 Nov 2002 WO
WO 02099520 Dec 2002 WO
WO 03063054 Jul 2003 WO
WO 03075210 Sep 2003 WO
WO 2004066194 Aug 2004 WO
WO 2004066693 Aug 2004 WO
WO 2005104012 Nov 2005 WO
WO 2005106774 Nov 2005 WO
WO 2005106774 Nov 2005 WO
WO 2006040724 Apr 2006 WO
WO 2006041780 Apr 2006 WO
WO 2007011607 Jan 2007 WO
2007089054 Aug 2007 WO
WO 2008033264 Mar 2008 WO
WO 2008033264 Mar 2008 WO
WO 2008033265 Jun 2008 WO
WO 2008033265 Jun 2008 WO
WO 2008137287 Nov 2008 WO
WO 2009002599 Dec 2008 WO
WO 2009002599 Dec 2008 WO
WO 2009029257 Jun 2009 WO
WO 2009079219 Jun 2009 WO
WO 2009079221 Jun 2009 WO
WO 2009079257 Jun 2009 WO
WO 2009079262 Jun 2009 WO
WO 2010034036 Mar 2010 WO
WO 2010036445 Apr 2010 WO
WO 2010143597 Dec 2010 WO
WO 2011053797 May 2011 WO
WO 2011126262 Oct 2011 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (12)
Entry
Matsumoto et al., Impact of Artificial “Gummy” Fingers on Fingerprint Systems, SPIE 4677 (2002), reprinted from cryptome.org.
Maltoni, “Handbook of Fingerprint Recognition”, XP002355942 Springer, New York, USA, Jun. 2003 (Jun. 2003) pp. 65-69.
Vermasan, et al., “A500 dpi AC Capacitive Hybrid Flip-Chip CMOS ASIC/Sensor Module for Fingerprint, Navigation, and Pointer Detection With On-Chip Data Processing”, IEEE Journal of Solid State Circuits, vol. 38, No. 12, Dec. 2003, pp. 2288-2294.
Ratha, et al. “Adaptive Flow Orientation Based Feature Extraction in Fingerprint Images,” Pattern Recognition, vol. 28 No. 11, 1657-1672, Nov. 1995.
Ratha, et al., “A Real Time Matching System for Large Fingerprint Databases,” IEEE, Aug. 1996.
Suh, et al., “Design and Implementation of the AEGIS Single-Chip Secure Processor Using Physical Random Functions”, Computer Architecture, 2005, ISCA '05, Proceedings, 32nd International Symposium, Jun. 2005 (MIT Technical Report CSAIL CSG-TR-843, 2004.
Rivest, et al., “A Method for Obtaining Digital Signatures and Public-Key Cryptosystems”, Communication of the ACM, vol. 21 (2), pp. 120-126. (1978).
Hiltgen, et al., “Secure Internet Banking Authentication”, IEEE Security and Privacy, IEEE Computer Society, New York, NY, US, Mar. 1, 2006 (Mar. 1, 2006), pp. 24-31, XP007908655, ISSN: 1540-7993.
Hegt, “Analysis of Current and Future Phishing Attacks on Internet Banking Services”, Mater Thesis. Techische Universiteit Eindhoven—Department of Mathematics and Computer Science May 31, 2008 (May 31, 2008), pp. 1-149, XP002630374, Retrieved from the Internet: URL:http://alexandria.tue.nl/extral/afstversl/wsk-i/hgt2008.pdf [retrieved on Mar. 29, 2011] *pp. 127-134, paragraph 6.2*.
Gassend, et al., “Controlled Physical Random Functions”, In Proceedings of the 18th Annual Computer Security Conference, Las Vegas, Nevada, Dec. 12, 2002.
bellagiodesigns.com (Internet Archive Wayback Machine, www.bellagiodesigns.com date: Oct. 29, 2005).
German Patent Office, Office Action in Application No. 10 2013 000 218.4, mailed Feb. 13, 2015.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20130169590 A1 Jul 2013 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
61582660 Jan 2012 US