The application relates generally to gas turbine engines and, more particularly, to gas turbine exhaust cases.
Turbine exhaust cases typically comprise inner and outer annular shrouds structurally interconnected by a plurality of circumferentially spaced-apart airfoils or struts. In use, the airfoils are exposed to the hot core flow leaving the turbine section and are, thus, subject to thermal expansion. Thermal fight or thermal mismatch between the inner and outer shrouds and the airfoils may result in non-negligible stress levels throughout the exhaust case structure. The thermal fight is amplified by the fact that the inner and outer shrouds tend to be cooler than the airfoils since they are somewhat thermally protected by the developed boundary layers and are also typically exposed to cooler external flows (e.g. fan bypass flow).
Over the years various approaches have been developed to reduce the level of stress in turbine exhaust cases. However, there remains room for improvement.
In one aspect, there is provided a turbine exhaust case for a gas turbine engine having an axis, the turbine exhaust case comprising a radially outer annular shroud and a radially inner annular shroud concentrically mounted about said axis and defining therebetween an annular gaspath for channelling hot gases; at least one strut support ring mounted inside said annular gaspath adjacent to and spaced apart from an associated one of said radially outer and inner annular shrouds so as to define a radial gap with the associated one of said radially outer and inner annular shrouds, said at least one strut support ring having a plurality of circumferentially spaced-part axially projecting fingers; and a plurality of circumferentially spaced-apart struts extending radially between said inner and outer annular shrouds, said struts being mounted at a first radial end thereof to said axially projecting fingers of said at least one strut support ring, said axially projecting fingers being radially deflectable into said radial gap in response to a thermal growth of said struts.
In a second aspect, there is provided a turbine exhaust case of a gas turbine engine, comprising a radially inner annular shroud mounted about an axis, a radially outer annular shroud concentrically mounted about the radially inner shroud, the radially inner and outer annular shrouds defining therebetween an annular gaspath, a circumferential array of exhaust struts extending across the gaspath, at least one radial end of said exhaust struts being mounted on a flexible strut mounting structure, said flexible strut mounting structure being radially deflectable relative to said radially outer and inner shrouds to accommodate thermal expansion of said exhaust struts during engine operation.
Reference is now made to the accompanying figures, in which:
a is a schematic cross-section view of a turbine exhaust case of the engine shown in
b is a cross-section view taken along line 2b-2b in
a is an enlarged cross-section view of the turbine exhaust case illustrating one possible flexible mounting arrangement of the exhaust struts to the outer shroud of the exhaust case; and
b is a cross-section view taken along line 3b-3b in
Referring to
In operation, combustion gases discharged from the combustor 23 power the high and low pressure turbines 19 and 15, and are then exhausted into the annular hot gaspath 33 defined between the inner and outer shrouds 27, 29 of the turbine exhaust case 25. The tangential components included in the exhaust gases may be de-swirled by the struts 31 or similar de-swirling airfoil structures which may be integrated in the turbine exhaust case 25, and then the exhaust gases are discharged into the atmosphere through the mixer 37 which facilitates the mixing of the exhaust gases with the outer air flow from the bypass passage.
Referring now more specifically to
According to the illustrated embodiment, each finger 42 supports one strut 31. However, other configurations are contemplated as well. The struts 31 may be welded or otherwise suitably mounted on the fingers 42. As can be seen from
As shown in
As shown in
The mounting of the radially outer end of the struts 31 to an intermediate structure (namely the flexible mounting structure 40′) as opposed to directly to the outer shroud 29 provides more flexibility for the designers in joining the mixer 37 to the remaining forward portion of the outer shroud 29. Indeed, previously the junction of the struts 31 with the outer shroud 29 was somewhat interfering with the joining of the mixer 37 with the outer shroud 29 at an axial location corresponding to the area where the struts 31 were attached to the outer shroud 29. Accordingly, the mixer 37 was typically attached to the outer shroud 29 at a location axially downstream of the struts 31. Now that the radially outer end of the struts 31 are mounted to the fingers 42′ of the support ring 44′ inside the outer shroud 29, the mixer 37 can be joined to the outer shroud 29 at a more axially forward location. According to the embodiment illustrated in
The designers may also take advantage of the gaps/free space between circumferentially adjacent fingers 42′ to position thermocouples or other measuring instruments/sensors (not shown) in the gaspath 33.
The above described inner and outer flexible strut mounting structures 40 and 40′ may be designed to maintain the integrity of the exhaust case 25 while providing just the right amount of flexibility to allow thermal expansion of the struts in a simple and practical way.
The above description is meant to be exemplary only, and one skilled in the art will recognize that changes may be made to the embodiments described without departing from the scope of the invention disclosed. For instance, it is understood that the flexible mounting structures may be provided at both ends of the struts or at only one of the radially outer and the radially inner end thereof. Also it is understood that individual cantilevered fingers could be separately mounted to an associated one of the inner and outer shroud. Still other modifications which fall within the scope of the present invention will be apparent to those skilled in the art, in light of a review of this disclosure, and such modifications are intended to fall within the scope of the appended claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2681788 | Wosika | Jun 1954 | A |
2928648 | Haines et al. | Mar 1960 | A |
3028141 | Nichols | Apr 1962 | A |
3071346 | Broffitt | Jan 1963 | A |
3511577 | Karstensen | May 1970 | A |
3730292 | MacDonald | May 1973 | A |
4106587 | Nash et al. | Aug 1978 | A |
4137992 | Herman | Feb 1979 | A |
4226297 | Cicon | Oct 1980 | A |
4240252 | Sargisson et al. | Dec 1980 | A |
4384822 | Schweikl et al. | May 1983 | A |
4391565 | Speak | Jul 1983 | A |
4433751 | Bonneau | Feb 1984 | A |
4534700 | Horler et al. | Aug 1985 | A |
4639189 | Rosman | Jan 1987 | A |
4756153 | Roberts et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
4889469 | Wilkinson | Dec 1989 | A |
4907946 | Ciokajlo et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
4926963 | Snyder | May 1990 | A |
4947958 | Snyder | Aug 1990 | A |
4989406 | Vdoviak et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
5060471 | Torkelson | Oct 1991 | A |
5167118 | Torkelson | Dec 1992 | A |
5269651 | Ostermeir et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5653580 | Faulder et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5715672 | Schockemoehl et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
6263998 | Schockemoehl et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6547518 | Czachor et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6584766 | Czachor | Jul 2003 | B1 |
7000406 | Markarian et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7246995 | Zborovsky | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7337875 | Proscia et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7604095 | Mitchell | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7784283 | Yu et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7819224 | Borchers et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7836702 | Grivas et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7886543 | Vincent | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7891195 | Bouty et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7950236 | Durocher et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7954596 | Schulze et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
20040253096 | Legg | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20060010852 | Gekht et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20110036068 | Lefebvre et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110108357 | Vauchel et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110126544 | Foster | Jun 2011 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
Broszat, Dominik et al., “Validation of an Integrated Acoustic Absorber in a Turbine Exit Guide Vane”, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics/CEAS Aeronacoustics Conference, Jun. 5-8, 2011, Portlant Oregon, p. 1-7. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130115076 A1 | May 2013 | US |