Technical Field
The present disclosure relates to laths, which may for example be used as a building material in stucco systems.
Description of the Related Art
One coat stucco systems were developed in the 1970's as a means to improve building wall energy efficiencies without increasing construction cost. Such stucco systems are applied over one inch thick expanded polystyrene (“EPS”) insulating foam board. The EPS foam board increases thermal resistance and hence improves energy efficiency. Traditional stucco is ¾ inch to ⅞ inch thick and requires a two coat application process. In contrast, one coat stucco is approximately ⅜ inch to ½ inch thick and can be applied in only one coat. Thus one coat stucco systems reduce costs with respect to traditional stucco systems due to savings in material as well as installation labor.
Traditionally, one coat stucco systems used one inch woven wire hexagonal laths. Such lath is specified in ASTM C1032 “Standard Specification for Woven Wire Plaster Base”. For one coat stucco, the lath is prescribed as having one inch hexagonal openings, and a wire size of 0.034 inch diameter, with the lath having a weight of 0.88 pounds per square yard. Such lath is produced in rolls of 36 inch width and 150 feet in length. A roll would contain 50 square yards and should weigh 44 lbs.
As noted, woven wire lath can be packaged in rolls, which improves installation efficiency since the lath lays flat when unrolled, and tufts well at attachment points when affixed to a suitable substrate such as EPS foam board using appropriate fasteners. These features provide the ability to achieve thin plaster coats with little or no telegraphing of the lath on the finished stucco surface. However, competitive pressures, have resulted in decreases in the wire size and increases in the opening sizes in woven wire lath. As a result of these changes, roll weights have decreased from about 45 pounds to about 35 pounds—a 22% decrease. This lighter lath results in stucco finishes that no longer perform at the prescribed or expected levels.
Further, the design of the woven wire hexagonal lath is such that the wire strands forming the hexagons do not lie in a straight line. Instead, the wires form a staircase shape that is less effective in providing reinforcement to the cured stucco finish, resulting in increased stucco cracking. Further, woven wire lath requires two parallel wire segments be twisted together to form at least two sides of the hexagon. This is an inefficient use of material since additional wire is necessary to form the twists, but serves no functional purpose in the stucco application.
Expanded metal laths have been found advantageous in one coat stucco applications. Expanded metal laths are created by forming a plurality of slits through a metal sheet or metal strip in a defined pattern. Exposing the slitted metal sheet or strip to a tensile force causes the slits to separate and form openings in the lath. Depending on the slit pattern, the openings may have a number of shapes, for example a diamond shape. Expanded metal lath is an extremely efficient material since the lath is monolithic and does not require means of attaching individual strands together such as welding or twisting. Extremely light meshes may be produced with weights as low as 0.2 pounds per square yard. However, such a light expanded metal lath is typically unsuitable for stucco applications, since fasteners such as power driven staples tend to shear the lath, particularly when used on a relatively soft substrate such as EPS foam.
Typical, attachment staples take the form of 16 gauge wire. To prevent shearing of the webs or strands forming the expanded metal lath, the webs or strands must have adequate strength and/or cross-sectional area. To provide adequate strength and/or cross-sectional area uniformly across the entirety of the expanded metal lath, the expanded metal lath would have a weight of upwards of 1.8 pounds per square yard (approximately 90 pounds per 50 square yard roll). Such an expanded metal lath would be uneconomical due to the excessive material required and likely would be difficult to package in the rolled form typically employed in the construction industry. Such an expanded metal lath would have to be packaged in sheets, which would likely require greater installation labor and incur commensurately greater installation costs.
Energy codes are continuing to require higher levels of insulation. For example, the latest edition of California Energy Commission Title 24 (target implementation July, 2014) will require either 2 by 8 framing, or with 2 by 4 framing with 1 inch of continuous insulation with ⅜ inch stucco to meet the U value 0.065 for low rise residential construction. Therefore, there will be greater demand for one coat stucco assuming that material and labor cost can be addressed.
An expanded metal lath can achieve efficient material usage, with no waste or unnecessary material being required. Since the dimensions of the webs or strands in the expanded metal lath are a function of the slit pattern, the expanded metal lath can be fabricated with different dimensions across the width of the lath. For example, the width of the webs or strands in sections where fasteners will be used may be greater than the width of the webs or strands in sections where fasteners will not be used. The sections of heavier webs or strands may be spaced in “bands” at defined intervals along the length of the lath, for example approximately every 6 inches, which is the fastening frequency required by many building codes.
A stabilizer (e.g., selvedge strip) can be added along the edge of the expanded metal lath to minimize the likelihood of distortion or stretching of the lath. This stabilizer may, for example, be resistance welded to the outer portions of the expanded metal lath webs or strands. The stabilizer could be round wire, flattened wire, or narrow strips of sheet metal. The stabilizer can be straight, or could have a slight sinusoidal or undulating shape, to provide some expansion capacity for attachment. The stabilizers may also provide protection along the edges of the lath, for example when product is palletized or during handling.
The sections or bands may be oriented in generally straight lines to provide maximum reinforcement and reduce cracking. The expanded metal lath would still be extensible when applied to achieve tufting and lay flat on the EPS foam board. The sizing of the webs or strands in the lath may be such as to achieve the strength and performance that would be equivalent to the full weight and dimensions prescribed by building codes for woven plaster lathing.
In some implementations, the heavier expanded sections or bands of the expanded metal lath may be flattened to facilitate packaging of the lath in rolls, with less curvature memory when unrolled. In other implementations, all of the webs or strands in the metal lath may be flattened. At times, some or all of the webs or strands in the expanded metal lath in the lighter portions may be twisted out of plane to form an angle (e.g., 45°) with the wall to minimize the tendency of the wet plaster to slump. By twisting the webs or strands at an angle to the underlying substrate, the wet plaster is forced toward the underlying substrate as it slumps downward. Such a structure may result in a much flatter and smoother wall finish without telegraphing of the lath. At times, the expanded metal lath may include furring elements. The furring elements may be a series of dimples, elbows, angled portions or rows of corrugations. The furring depth may, for example, be approximately ⅛ inch.
The expanded metal lath may have openings of ⅝ to 1¼ inches. The standard web or strand dimensions would be approximately 0.021 inches in width by 0.018 inches in depth and the heavier webs or strands would be approximately 0.070 inches in width by 0.018 inches in depth. Where used, stabilizer wires may, for example, be approximately 25 gauge to 20 gauge (0.020 to 0.340 inch diameter), or if flattened, the area may be equivalent to the cross sectional area of this range of circular cross-sections. The approximate weight of the expanded metal lath would be approximately 0.5 pounds per square yard or approximately 25 pounds per roll.
A metal lath product may be summarized as including: an expanded metal lath having a length, a width, a first longitudinal edge, a second longitudinal edge spaced across the width of the expanded metal lath from the first longitudinal edge, a first lateral edge, a second lateral edge spaced across the length of the expanded metal lath from the first lateral edge, a plurality of openings delineated by a plurality of webs, each of the openings have a respective first dimension along a first axis of the opening and a second dimension along a second axis of the opening, the second axis of the opening perpendicular to the first axis of the opening; a first lateral stabilizer secured to the expanded metal lath at least proximate the first lateral edge of the expanded metal lath between the first and the second longitudinal edges; and a second lateral stabilizer secured to the expanded metal lath at least proximate the second lateral edge of the expanded metal lath between the first and the second longitudinal edges.
The webs of a first plurality of bands of the webs of the expanded metal lath may have a first lateral web width, and the webs of a second plurality of bands of the webs of the expanded metal lath may have a second web width, the second web width different from the first web width, each of the bands of the second plurality of bands of webs interspaced between a respective pair of bands of the bands of the first plurality of bands of webs. Successive ones of the bands of the first plurality of bands may be spaced approximately six inches from one another across the width of the expanded metal lath, and the web width of the webs of the bands of the first plurality of bands of webs may be greater than the web width of the webs of the second plurality of bands of webs. A first band of the first plurality of bands may run along the first longitudinal edge and a last band of the first plurality of bands may run along the second longitudinal edge, at least one other band of the first plurality of bands spaced between the first and the second bands of the first plurality of bands. The web width of the webs of the first plurality of webs being may be between 0.6 inches and 1.25 inches wide. The webs of at least the first plurality of webs may be flatten. All of the webs may be flatten. Two or more of the webs of the expanded metal lath may each include at least one furring bend or at least one furring dimple, which extends out of a plane in which a majority of the expanded metal lath product lies flat. The first dimension of the opening may be larger than the second dimension of the opening. The first axis of the opening may be parallel to the length of the expanded metal lath when the expanded metal lath lies flat and the second dimension of the opening may be parallel to the width of the expanded metal lath when the expanded metal lath product lies flat. The first dimension of the opening may be larger than the second dimension of the opening, and each included angle in the opening may not be equal to ninety degrees. The expanded metal lath may be a unitary single piece of metal and stabilizers welded or fixed thereto. The expanded metal lath may be louvered with at least some of the webs angled out of a plane in which a remainder (e.g., majority) of the expanded metal lath lies when the metal lath product lies flat. The expanded metal lath may be a unitary single piece of steel. The expanded metal lath may be a unitary single piece of low carbon steel or galvanized steel, and the metal lath product may have a nominal weight of 0.5 lbs. per square yard. The first stabilizer may lie on and be secured to one face of the expanded metal lath. The first and the second stabilizers may be respectively a first and a second piece of round wire, a first and a second piece of flatten wire, or a first and a second piece of sheet metal. The first and the second stabilizers may each be unitary single straight pieces of metal welded to portions of the expanded metal lath. The first and the second stabilizers may each be unitary single undulating pieces of metal. The metal lath product may further include: at least a third stabilizer secured to the expanded metal lath spaced between the first and the second stabilizers and extending from at least proximate the first lateral edge to at least proximate the second lateral edge. The metal lath product may be installed on a wall of a building.
A method of manufacturing a metal lath product may be summarized as including: forming an expanded metal lath having a length, a width, a first longitudinal edge, a second longitudinal edge spaced across the width of the expanded metal lath from the first longitudinal edge, a first lateral edge, a second lateral edge spaced across the length of the expanded metal lath from the first lateral edge, a plurality of openings delineated by a plurality of webs, each of the openings have a respective first dimension along a first axis of the opening and a second dimension along a second axis of the opening, the second axis of the opening perpendicular to the first axis of the opening, the webs of a first plurality of bands of the webs of the expanded metal lath have a first lateral web width, and the webs of a second plurality of bands of the webs of the expanded metal lath have a second web width, the second web width different from the first web width, each of the bands of the second plurality of bands of webs interspaced between a respective pair of bands of the bands of the first plurality of bands of webs; securing a first lateral stabilizer to the expanded metal lath at least proximate to the first longitudinal edge of the expanded metal lath between the first and the second edges lateral; and securing a second stabilizer to the expanded metal lath at least proximate to the second longitudinal edge of the expanded metal lath between the first and the second lateral edges.
Forming an expanded metal lath may include forming the expanded metal lath with successive ones of the bands of the first plurality of bands spaced approximately six inches from one another across the width of the expanded metal lath, and the web width of the webs of the bands of the first plurality of bands of webs greater than the web width of the webs of the second plurality of bands of webs. Forming an expanded metal lath may include forming the expanded metal lath with a first band of the first plurality of bands running along the first longitudinal edge and a last band of the first plurality of bands running along the second longitudinal edge, at least one other band of the first plurality of bands spaced between the first and the second bands of the first plurality of bands, and with the web width of the webs of the first plurality of webs being approximately 0.6 to approximately 1.25 inch inches wide. The method may further include: forming a plurality of furring bends or furring dimples in two or more of the webs of the expanded metal lath, which extends out of a plane in which a majority of the expanded metal lath product lies flat. The method may further include: flattening the webs of at least the first plurality of webs of the expanded metal lath; and rolling the expanded metal lath product for delivery. The method may further include: flattening all of the webs of the expanded metal lath; and rolling the expanded metal lath product for delivery.
In the drawings, identical reference numbers identify similar elements or acts. For clarity of illustration, similar elements within a figure may only be called out for a representative element of similar elements. Of course, any number of similar elements may be included in a lath, and the number of similar elements shown in a drawing is intended to be illustrative, not limiting. The sizes and relative positions of elements in the drawings are not necessarily drawn to scale. For example, the shapes of various elements and angles are not drawn to scale, and some of these elements are arbitrarily enlarged and positioned to improve drawing legibility. Further, the particular shapes of the elements as drawn, are not intended to convey any information regarding the actual shape of the particular elements, and have been solely selected for ease of recognition in the drawings.
In the following description, certain specific details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of various disclosed embodiments. However, one skilled in the relevant art will recognize that embodiments may be practiced without one or more of these specific details, or with other methods, components, materials, etc. In other instances, well-known structures associated with laths such as substrates, fasteners for mounting laths to substrates, barrier layers separating stucco from substrates, methods for mounting laths, etc., have not been shown or described in detail to avoid unnecessarily obscuring descriptions of the embodiments.
Unless the context requires otherwise, throughout the specification and claims which follow, the word “comprise” and variations thereof, such as, “comprises” and “comprising” are to be construed in an open, inclusive sense, that is as “including, but not limited to.”
Reference throughout this specification to “one embodiment” or “an embodiment” means that a particular feature, structure or characteristic described in connection with the embodiment is included in at least one embodiment. Thus, the appearances of the phrases “in one embodiment” or “in an embodiment” in various places throughout this specification are not necessarily all referring to the same embodiment. Furthermore, the particular features, structures, or characteristics may be combined in any suitable manner in one or more embodiments.
As used in this specification and the appended claims, the singular forms “a,” “an,” and “the” include plural referents unless the content clearly dictates otherwise. It should also be noted that the term “or” is generally employed in its sense including “and/or” unless the content clearly dictates otherwise.
The headings and Abstract of the Disclosure provided herein are for convenience only and do not interpret the scope or meaning of the embodiments.
The expanded metal lath 101 includes a plurality of openings 102 delineated by a plurality of webs 104. The expanded metal lath 101 includes a first longitudinal edge 106a and a second longitudinal edge 106b (collectively, “longitudinal edges 106”) spaced across a width 108 of the expanded metal lath 100. The expanded metal lath 101 further includes a first lateral edge 110a and a second lateral edge 110b (collectively, “lateral edges 110”) spaced across a length 112 of the expanded metal lath 101.
Each of the openings 102 has a respective first dimension, d1, along a first axis of the opening 114a and a respective second dimension, d2, along a second axis of the opening 114b. In some instances, the first axis 114a and the second axis 114b are orthogonal. The first dimension d1 and the second dimension d2 may be similar (i.e., some or all of the openings 102 will be substantially square) or the first dimension d1 and the second dimension d2 may differ (i.e., some or all of the openings 102 will be substantially rectangular, diamond-shaped, or trapezoidal). In some implementations, the first axis 114a can be parallel to at least one longitudinal edge 106a, 106b of the expanded metal lath 100. In some implementations, the second axis 114b can be parallel to at least one lateral edge 110a, 110b of the expanded metal lath 101.
In some instances, the openings 102 can have a first dimension d1 along the first axis 114a of from about 0.125 inches to about 1.25 inches; from about 0.25 inches to about 1.125 inches; from about 0.375 inches to about 1 inch; from about 0.5 inches to about 0.875 inches; or from about 0.625 inches to about 0.75 inches. In some instances, the openings 102 can have a second dimension d2 along the second axis 114b of from about 0.125 inches to about 1.25 inches; from about 0.25 inches to about 1.125 inches; from about 0.375 inches to about 1 inch; from about 0.5 inches to about 0.875 inches; or from about 0.625 inches to about 0.75 inches.
The plurality of webs 104 may be formed by penetrating, cutting (e.g., via laser, water jet, or blade) or otherwise slitting a material, such as sheet or strip steel, in a defined pattern and subjecting the slitted material to an axial tensile force to expand the resulting slits or openings and form the pattern of openings 102, and the plurality of webs 104.
The plurality of webs 104 may advantageously include a first number of webs 104a having a first set of dimensions and a second number of webs 104b having a second set of dimensions, the second set of dimensions including at least one dimension (e.g., width of web) that has a value greater than a corresponding dimension of the first set of dimensions. The first number of webs 104a may be denominated as “lighter” webs 104a, while the second number of webs 104b may be denominated a “heavier” webs 104b due to their larger dimension(s).
The webs 104 may be arranged into a number of bands or sections 120a-120n (collectively 120) of “heavier” webs 104b (i.e., webs having at least one dimension that is larger than the corresponding dimension(s) of the webs 104a) and a number of bands or sections 121a-121n (collectively 121) of “lighter” webs 104a (i.e., webs having at least one dimension that is smaller than the corresponding dimension(s) of the webs 104b). The bands or sections 120 of webs 104b having larger dimension(s) are denominated herein as “heavier web bands or sections” 120, while the bands or sections 121 of webs 104a having smaller dimension(s) are denominated herein as “lighter web bands or sections” 121.
The heavier web bands or sections 120 are spaced from one another by the lighter web bands or sections 121, with a lighter web band or section 121 interposed between each successive pair of heavier web bands or sections 120. The heavier web bands or sections 120 may extend transversely across a width 108 of the expanded metal lath 101. A respective one of the heavier web bands or sections 120 may be positioned at, along or at least proximate opposed edges of the expanded metal lath 101.
As shown in
As depicted in
In the illustrated embodiment, a width of the lighter web 104a is less than a corresponding width of the heavier webs 104b. A thickness of the lighter webs 104a and the heavier webs 104b is similar since both are dependent on the thickness of the metal sheet or strip material used to fabricate the expanded metal lath 101. The lighter webs 104a can, for example, have a width of from about 0.01 inches to about 0.075 inches; of from about 0.01 inches to about 0.060 inches; of from about 0.01 inches to about 0.045 inches; of from about 0.01 inches to about 0.035 inches; or about 0.01 inches to about 0.03 inches. The heavier webs 104b can have a width of from about 0.05 inches to about 0.10 inches; of from about 0.06 inches to about 0.09 inches; of from about 0.06 inches to about 0.085 inches; of from about 0.065 inches to about 0.08 inches; or about 0.065 inches to about 0.075 inches. The lighter webs 104a and the heavier webs 104b can have a thickness of from about 0.075 inches; of from about 0.01 inches to about 0.060 inches; of from about 0.01 inches to about 0.045 inches; of from about 0.01 inches to about 0.035 inches; or about 0.01 inches to about 0.03 inches.
In the process of stretching, the webs are typically twisted out of plane. In some implementations, some or all of the lighter webs 104a and some or all of the heavier webs 104b may be flattened to be in-plane with (i.e., at an angle of approximately 0° with respect to) a major or longitudinal plane of the metal sheet or strip material used to fabricate the expanded metal lath 101. In other words, after expansion, the respective lighter webs 104a and the respective heavier webs 104b will be out-of-plane unless “flattened” to be in-plane. In some instances the preferred orientation may be with the upper edge of the web out-of-plane, thereby forcing wet plaster inwards. In such implementations, the installation directions may indicate such, and the expanded metal lath product may bear a legend “this side up” or “this side out” indicating which is the outside face.
In some implementations, some or all of the lighter webs 104a and some or all of the heavier webs 104b may be formed at an angle with respect to the major or longitudinal plane of the metal sheet or strip material used to fabricate the expanded metal lath 101, that is out of plane. In other words, after expansion, some or all of the respective lighter webs 104a and some or all of the respective heavier webs 104b will protrude at an angle with respect to the major or longitudinal plane of the metal sheet or strip material used to fabricate the expanded metal lath 101. The webs 104 can form an angle with respect to the plane of the expanded metal lath 101 of about 10° or less; about 30° or less; about 45° or less; about 60° or less; about 75° or less; or about 90° or less.
In use, the angled webs 104 advantageously assist in minimizing the occurrence and/or impact of slump in the one coat stucco finish. The angled portions of the webs 104 tends to force the slumping stucco towards the underlying substrate such as a building wall or EPS foam board to which the expanded metal lath product 100 is attached, thereby providing a smoother, more uniform, finished surface.
At times, at least one of either the longitudinal edges 106 or the lateral edges 110 of the expanded metal lath 101 terminate in at least one band or section of heavier webs 104b. Forming the expanded metal lath 100 with at least one band or section of heavier webs 104b at opposed edges facilitates anchoring the expanded metal lath product 100 on an underlying substrate such as a wall or EPS foam board using anchors 124 such as wire staples.
One or more stabilizers or selvedge strips 130a, 130b (collectively, “stabilizers 130”) are affixed to at least one of either the longitudinal edges 106 or the lateral edges 110 of the expanded metal lath 101. The stabilizers 130 advantageously assist in minimizing or even eliminating distortion and stretching of the expanded metal lath 100 during installation. Various materials may be used for the stabilizers 130 including round wire, flattened wire, or metal strips. The stabilizers 130 may reside on one major face or side of the expanded metal lath 101, and physically secured at opposed peripheral edges of the expanded metal lath 100. Alternative, the stabilizers 130 may be interleaved with or threaded through the heavier web bands 104b.
In some instances, the stabilizers 130 may be straight (e.g., stabilizer 130a best depicted in
The expanded metal lath product 100 can have a weight of from about 0.1 pounds per square yard (5 pounds per 50 square yard roll) to about 0.75 pounds per square yard (38 pounds per 50 square yard roll); from about 0.2 pounds per square yard (10 pounds per 50 square yard roll) to about 0.6 pounds per square yard (30 pounds per 50 square yard roll); or from about 0.4 pounds per square yard (20 pounds per 50 square yard roll) to about 0.6 pounds per square yard (30 pounds per 50 square yard roll).
The furring elements 202 are disposed on one side of the expanded metal lath product 200 in any regular or irregular pattern. The furring elements 202 may be integrally formed with either or both the lighter webs 104a and the heavier webs 104b. The furring elements 202 typically is a series of dimples, elbows, angles, or rows of corrugations, being an integral, unitary single piece construction of the expanded metal lath. Alternatively, the furring elements 202 may be separate elements attachable to the expanded metal lath product either during the manufacturing process or during the installation of the expanded metal lath product 200 at a jobsite.
The furring elements 202 have a height that causes the expanded metal lath product 200 to separate from the underlying substrate a distance of from about 0.05 inches to about 0.625 inches; from about 0.05 inches to about 0.5 inches; from about 0.05 inches to about 0.375 inches; or from about 0.05 inches to about 0.25 inches. For example, the furring elements 202 may have a height of approximately 0.125 inches.
A single coat of stucco or plaster is applied over the expanded metal lath product 200. The stucco or plaster flows or is forced via application of pressure to flow at least partially about the expanded metal lath 200, thereby encapsulating at least a portion of the expanded metal lath product 200. In addition to providing support to the wet stucco or plaster, the expanded metal lath product 200 adds a degree of structural reinforcement to the finished stucco surface.
The above description of illustrated embodiments, including what is described in the Abstract, is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the embodiments to the precise forms disclosed. Although specific embodiments of and examples are described herein for illustrative purposes, various equivalent modifications can be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the disclosure, as will be recognized by those skilled in the relevant art. The teachings provided herein of the various embodiments can be applied to other laths and methods of producing a lath, not necessarily the exemplary laths and methods generally described above. For example, the various embodiments described above can be combined to provide further embodiments.
These and other changes can be made to the embodiments in light of the above-detailed description. In general, in the following claims, the terms used should not be construed to limit the claims to the specific embodiments disclosed in the specification and the claims, but should be construed to include all possible embodiments along with the full scope of equivalents to which such claims are entitled. Accordingly, the claims are not limited by the disclosure.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
320163 | Orr | Jun 1885 | A |
528931 | Eils | Nov 1894 | A |
553306 | Fordyce | Jan 1896 | A |
600352 | Bell | Mar 1898 | A |
617458 | Clancy | Jan 1899 | A |
651590 | Brightman | Jun 1900 | A |
659416 | Perry | Oct 1900 | A |
D35386 | Reid | Dec 1901 | S |
749714 | Barnes et al. | Jan 1904 | A |
792039 | Hollinger | Jun 1905 | A |
930350 | Clark | Aug 1909 | A |
934081 | Marks | Sep 1909 | A |
945656 | White | Jan 1910 | A |
948414 | Clark | Feb 1910 | A |
987374 | Kahn | Mar 1911 | A |
1059710 | Chess, Jr. | Apr 1913 | A |
1087511 | Scammell | Feb 1914 | A |
1112649 | Parr | Oct 1914 | A |
1146999 | Burk | Jul 1915 | A |
1147000 | Burk | Jul 1915 | A |
1276764 | Holbrook, Sr. | Aug 1918 | A |
1314777 | White | Sep 1919 | A |
1363018 | Sexton | Dec 1920 | A |
1372741 | Dickinson | Mar 1921 | A |
1405579 | Graham | Feb 1922 | A |
1419709 | Ackermann | Jun 1922 | A |
1434915 | Scholfield | Nov 1922 | A |
1436866 | Dickinson | Nov 1922 | A |
1537588 | Curtis | May 1925 | A |
1591858 | McClintic | Jul 1926 | A |
1637410 | Coryell | Aug 1927 | A |
1641872 | Southwell | Sep 1927 | A |
1655091 | Curtis | Jan 1928 | A |
1691227 | Cross | Nov 1928 | A |
1701125 | Sagendorph | Feb 1929 | A |
1704608 | Frank | Mar 1929 | A |
1743800 | Pearce | Jan 1930 | A |
1767814 | Reynolds | Jun 1930 | A |
1769361 | Warren | Jul 1930 | A |
1801530 | Overmire | Apr 1931 | A |
1802779 | Quade | Apr 1931 | A |
1824082 | Hernandez | Sep 1931 | A |
1837393 | Arey | Dec 1931 | A |
1885343 | Greulich | Nov 1932 | A |
1897842 | Herbest, Jr. | Feb 1933 | A |
1963395 | Zabriskie | Jun 1934 | A |
1964403 | Loucks | Jun 1934 | A |
1976395 | Herbest, Jr. | Oct 1934 | A |
1986171 | Wilson | Jan 1935 | A |
1986172 | Wilson | Jan 1935 | A |
1993432 | Boyle | Mar 1935 | A |
2022363 | Vertuno | Nov 1935 | A |
2089023 | Hahn | Aug 1937 | A |
2099709 | Spinosa | Nov 1937 | A |
2101074 | Kotrbaty | Dec 1937 | A |
2116668 | Cross | May 1938 | A |
2121962 | Glass | Jun 1938 | A |
2131670 | Redding et al. | Sep 1938 | A |
2136071 | Braden | Nov 1938 | A |
2141400 | Mack | Dec 1938 | A |
2150606 | McLellan | Mar 1939 | A |
2180486 | Tench | Nov 1939 | A |
2184353 | Leary | Dec 1939 | A |
2218007 | Miller | Oct 1940 | A |
2219806 | Buttress | Oct 1940 | A |
2236141 | Karelius | Mar 1941 | A |
2241991 | Goldsmith | May 1941 | A |
2243723 | Tench | May 1941 | A |
2256394 | Lamel | Sep 1941 | A |
2267401 | Gilmore | Dec 1941 | A |
2269869 | Specht | Jan 1942 | A |
2315687 | Burke | Apr 1943 | A |
2322654 | Moore | Jun 1943 | A |
2322657 | Olsen | Jun 1943 | A |
2375303 | Karelius | May 1945 | A |
2455666 | Fournier | Dec 1948 | A |
2474778 | Cross | Jun 1949 | A |
2501699 | Stecker | Mar 1950 | A |
2565292 | Arthur | Aug 1951 | A |
2572483 | Howle | Oct 1951 | A |
2595465 | Keene et al. | May 1952 | A |
2605867 | Goodwin | Aug 1952 | A |
2621160 | Johnson et al. | Dec 1952 | A |
2639269 | Dube | May 1953 | A |
2645824 | Titsworth | Jul 1953 | A |
2645930 | Stockton | Jul 1953 | A |
2650171 | Schaaf | Aug 1953 | A |
2668606 | King | Feb 1954 | A |
2824022 | Sucetti | Feb 1958 | A |
2903880 | Johnson | Sep 1959 | A |
2929239 | Dahlhauser et al. | Mar 1960 | A |
2936051 | Martin | May 1960 | A |
2996160 | Voight | Aug 1961 | A |
3070198 | Haskell | Dec 1962 | A |
3073066 | Edwards et al. | Jan 1963 | A |
3097832 | Murdock et al. | Jul 1963 | A |
3145001 | Bruninga | Aug 1964 | A |
3276096 | McAleer et al. | Oct 1966 | A |
3299785 | James | Jan 1967 | A |
3304680 | Birdwell | Feb 1967 | A |
3342003 | Frank | Sep 1967 | A |
3363371 | Villalobos | Jan 1968 | A |
3475876 | Oroschakoff | Nov 1969 | A |
3503590 | Buysens | Mar 1970 | A |
3522685 | Oroschakoff | Aug 1970 | A |
3581649 | Rauenhorst | Jun 1971 | A |
3600868 | Wilson, Jr. et al. | Aug 1971 | A |
3660215 | Pawlicki | May 1972 | A |
3672022 | York | Jun 1972 | A |
3757485 | Vincens | Sep 1973 | A |
3769065 | Dunn | Oct 1973 | A |
3789747 | Wasserman et al. | Feb 1974 | A |
3831333 | Nelsson et al. | Aug 1974 | A |
3947936 | Wheadon | Apr 1976 | A |
3954180 | Montonen | May 1976 | A |
3991536 | Rutherford | Nov 1976 | A |
4000241 | Dunn | Dec 1976 | A |
4003178 | Douthwaite | Jan 1977 | A |
4011704 | O'Konski | Mar 1977 | A |
4020612 | Welch | May 1977 | A |
4056195 | Keith | Nov 1977 | A |
4085558 | Albrecht | Apr 1978 | A |
4099386 | Sagasta | Jul 1978 | A |
4159302 | Greve et al. | Jun 1979 | A |
4179264 | Vancauwenberghe | Dec 1979 | A |
4226061 | Day, Jr. | Oct 1980 | A |
4245926 | Asszonyi et al. | Jan 1981 | A |
4248022 | Walker | Feb 1981 | A |
4255489 | Nielsen | Mar 1981 | A |
4297866 | Sakauye et al. | Nov 1981 | A |
4343127 | Greve et al. | Aug 1982 | A |
4347155 | Jenkins | Aug 1982 | A |
4385476 | Slager | May 1983 | A |
4396685 | Jury | Aug 1983 | A |
4447380 | Shannon et al. | May 1984 | A |
4464885 | Palacio et al. | Aug 1984 | A |
4485606 | Gottlieb | Dec 1984 | A |
4510727 | Jury | Apr 1985 | A |
4512736 | Wader | Apr 1985 | A |
4513551 | Gauffin et al. | Apr 1985 | A |
4520073 | Randolph et al. | May 1985 | A |
4522860 | Scott et al. | Jun 1985 | A |
4525388 | Rehder et al. | Jun 1985 | A |
4539787 | Ritter et al. | Sep 1985 | A |
4545170 | Shirey | Oct 1985 | A |
4551957 | Madray | Nov 1985 | A |
4559749 | Nusbaum | Dec 1985 | A |
4559752 | Kieffer | Dec 1985 | A |
4571914 | Stoyanoff | Feb 1986 | A |
4580379 | Nusbaum | Apr 1986 | A |
4621397 | Schrenk | Nov 1986 | A |
4658552 | Mulford | Apr 1987 | A |
4669243 | Gore et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
4691493 | Larsen | Sep 1987 | A |
4693048 | Guetersloh | Sep 1987 | A |
4695033 | Imaeda et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
4713921 | Minialoff et al. | Dec 1987 | A |
4720957 | Madray | Jan 1988 | A |
4722861 | Sawaide | Feb 1988 | A |
4734337 | Patton | Mar 1988 | A |
4793113 | Bodnar | Dec 1988 | A |
4803128 | Bender | Feb 1989 | A |
4819395 | Sugita et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4841705 | Fuhrer | Jun 1989 | A |
4843786 | Walkinshaw et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4893569 | Hansen | Jan 1990 | A |
4897007 | Chen et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
4968185 | Leibhard et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
5002696 | White | Mar 1991 | A |
5027572 | Purcell et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5029779 | Bruggeman | Jul 1991 | A |
5081814 | Singletary et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5157883 | Meyer | Oct 1992 | A |
5157887 | Watterworth, III | Oct 1992 | A |
5231811 | Andrepont et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5249400 | Turner | Oct 1993 | A |
5287673 | Kreikemeier | Feb 1994 | A |
5305941 | Kent et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5321928 | Warneke | Jun 1994 | A |
5360771 | Delvaux et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5363621 | Kroll et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5410852 | Edgar et al. | May 1995 | A |
5418013 | Detrick et al. | May 1995 | A |
5439518 | Francis et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5481843 | Kreikemeier | Jan 1996 | A |
5527590 | Priluck | Jun 1996 | A |
5528876 | Lu | Jun 1996 | A |
5529192 | Conen et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5540023 | Jaenson | Jul 1996 | A |
5570953 | DeWall | Nov 1996 | A |
5590505 | Bogle | Jan 1997 | A |
5592800 | Koo et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5605024 | Sucato et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5617686 | Gallagher, Jr. | Apr 1997 | A |
5625995 | Martin | May 1997 | A |
5685116 | Bradshaw et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5697195 | Maylon | Dec 1997 | A |
5716718 | Lai | Feb 1998 | A |
5732520 | Maietta | Mar 1998 | A |
5753036 | Hornaman et al. | May 1998 | A |
5755545 | Banks | May 1998 | A |
5761864 | Nonoshita | Jun 1998 | A |
5778626 | Hellsten | Jul 1998 | A |
5826388 | Irving | Oct 1998 | A |
5836135 | Hagan et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5842276 | Asher et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5845379 | Steffensen | Dec 1998 | A |
5852908 | Nankin | Dec 1998 | A |
5867949 | Untiedt | Feb 1999 | A |
5867962 | Scott et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5927035 | Haytayan | Jul 1999 | A |
5937600 | Larson | Aug 1999 | A |
5943775 | Lanahan et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5979131 | Remmele et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5979787 | Scarpa | Nov 1999 | A |
6035595 | Anderson | Mar 2000 | A |
6047510 | Gallaway | Apr 2000 | A |
6050048 | Hellsten | Apr 2000 | A |
6052959 | LaBrosse | Apr 2000 | A |
6108991 | Hagan et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6149701 | Ellingson | Nov 2000 | A |
6205740 | Ekerholm et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6207256 | Tashiro | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6254981 | Castle | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6263629 | Brown, Jr. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6305432 | Sacks et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6330777 | Padley | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6343452 | Holden | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6363679 | Rutherford | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6390438 | Mc Manus | May 2002 | B1 |
6412249 | Boyer et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6447928 | Suitts | Sep 2002 | B2 |
6460393 | Sundhagen | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6481175 | Potter et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6584735 | Burton | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6609344 | Saldana | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6617386 | Lelli et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6658809 | Collins | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6668501 | Adebar et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6754997 | Bonin | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6758743 | Grosskrueger | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6820387 | Sacks et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6823636 | Mahoney | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6910311 | Lindberg et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6920734 | Elderson | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6938383 | Morris et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6993883 | Belanger | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7117649 | Morris et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7143551 | Corwin | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7174688 | Higginbotham | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7179165 | Cook | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7195556 | Fichtelman | Mar 2007 | B1 |
7231746 | Bodnar | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7287356 | Sacks et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7368175 | Neth | May 2008 | B2 |
7381261 | Nelson | Jun 2008 | B1 |
7497903 | Wang et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7517590 | Wagner | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7538152 | Bohler et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7565775 | Cooper et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7604534 | Hill | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7654051 | Pollack | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7690167 | Antonic | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7735294 | Moody et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7788868 | Pollack | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7820302 | Krettenauer | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7861488 | Giles et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7866112 | Edmonson | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7921537 | Rodlin | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7955460 | Bennett, III et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8074416 | Andrews | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8084117 | Lalvani | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8171696 | Powers, III et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8225581 | Strickland et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8234836 | Anderson | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8276321 | Bell | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8281551 | Leek et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8578576 | Castricum | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8615957 | Sacks et al. | Dec 2013 | B1 |
8696781 | Wallner et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8720142 | Spilchen | May 2014 | B2 |
20030029129 | Walters | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030055147 | Lelli et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030126806 | Ellis | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20040000118 | Fuerle | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040134158 | Farrell, Jr. et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20050011156 | Tseng | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050055953 | Sacks et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050108978 | Strickland et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20060075715 | Serpico et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060265997 | Collins, Jr. et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070072541 | Daniels, II et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070119106 | Sacks et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070175145 | Sacks et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070193150 | Carlson | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070243820 | O'Hagin | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080250738 | Howchin | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090013633 | Aubuchon | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090186570 | Riggins | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090203308 | O'Hagin et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20100126097 | Powers, III | May 2010 | A1 |
20100229501 | Bodnar | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100287872 | Bodnar | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100300645 | Glover | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110021663 | Sacks et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20120028563 | Sacks et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120186190 | Powers, III et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120279162 | Strickland et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130333172 | Wallner et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20150240486 | Sacks et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150308118 | Spilchen et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2 391 269 | Jan 2003 | CA |
2 652 919 | May 2010 | CA |
658 489 | Nov 1986 | CH |
40 19 281 | Dec 1991 | DE |
0 579 007 | Jan 1994 | EP |
0 637 658 | Feb 1995 | EP |
0 691 441 | Jan 1996 | EP |
2 421 695 | Nov 1979 | FR |
2 584 957 | Jan 1987 | FR |
311636 | May 1929 | GB |
414277 | Aug 1934 | GB |
2 201 184 | Aug 1988 | GB |
4-293848 | Oct 1992 | JP |
7-233611 | Sep 1995 | JP |
11-181989 | Jul 1999 | JP |
2001-65140 | Mar 2001 | JP |
2003-13577 | Jan 2003 | JP |
0053356 | Sep 2000 | WO |
2010059631 | May 2010 | WO |
2012024768 | Mar 2012 | WO |
Entry |
---|
“Decorative Patterns Portfolio,” retrieved from http://www.expac.com/decorative—patterns.htm, retrieved on, May 6, 2014, 2 pages. |
“Expanded Metal Terminology,” retrieved from http://www.expac.com/glossary.htm, retrieved on, May 6, 2014, 2 pages. |
“HVAC Filter Industry,” retrieved from http://www.expac.com/hvac.htm, retrieved on, May 6, 2014, 1 page. |
“Standard Pattern Portfolio,” retrieved from http://www.expac.com/standardportfolio.htm, retrieved on, May 6, 2014, 2 pages. |
International Search Report, for International Application No. PCT/US2010/050421, mailed Feb. 9, 2011, 11 pages. |
National Association of Architectural Metal Manufacturers, EMMA 557-99, “Standards for Expanded Metal,” NAAMM, 1999, 18 pages. |
Andrade et al., “Lateral-torsional buckling of singly symmetric web-tapered thin-walled I-beams: 1D model vs. shell Fea,” Computers and Structures 85:1343-1359, 2007. |
Blomberg et al., “Heat Transmission Through Walls with Slotted Steel Studs,” Thermal Envelopes VII/Wall Systems—Principles, pp. 621-628, 1998. |
Hoglund et al., “Slotted steel studs to reduce thermal bridges in insulated walls,” Thin-Walled Structures 32:81-109, 1998. |
Sacks et al., “Framing Members to Enhance Thermal Characteristics of Walls,” Amendment filed Nov. 4, 2015, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/681,919, 20 pages. |
Sacks et al., “Framing Members to Enhance Thermal Characteristics of Walls,” U.S. Appl. No. 14/189,548, filed Feb. 25, 2014, 45 pages. |
Sacks et al., “Framing Members to Enhance Thermal Characteristics of Walls,” Office Action mailed Oct. 9, 2014, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/189,548, 44 pages. |
Sacks et al., “Framing Members to Enhance Thermal Characteristics of Walls,” U.S. Appl. No. 14/681,919, filed Apr. 8, 2015, 92 pages. |
Sacks et al., “Framing Members to Enhance Thermal Characteristics of Walls,” Office Action mailed Apr. 8, 2015, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/681,919, 26 pages. |
Sacks et al., “Light-Weight Metal Stud and Method of Manufacture,” Office Action mailed May 14, 2013, for U.S. Appl. No. 13/767,764, 12 pages. |
Sacks et al., “Light-Weight Metal Stud and Method of Manufacture,” Amendment filed Aug. 7, 2013, for U.S. Appl. No. 13/767,764, 14 pages. |
Spilchen et al., “Reinforcing Insert Article, Kit and Method,” Amendment filed Dec. 18, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/795,731, 20 pages. |
Spilchen et al., “Reinforcing Insert Article, Kit and Method,” Office Action filed Sep. 18, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/795,731, 25 pages. |
Spilchen et al., “Reinforcing Insert Article, Kit and Method,” U.S. Appl. No. 61/903,513, filed Nov. 13, 2013, 26 pages. |
Wallner et al., “Expanded Metal and Process of Making the Same,” U.S. Appl. No. 13/970,472, filed Aug. 19, 2013, 27 pages. |
Wallner et al., “Expanded Metal and Process of Making the Same,” Preliminary Amendment filed Oct. 16, 2013, for U.S. Appl. No. 13/970,472, 12 pages. |
Sacks et al., “Framing Members to Enhance Thermal Characteristics of Walls,” Office Action, mailed Feb. 4, 2016, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/681,919, 19 pages. |
Demandit, “Interior/Exterior Acrylic Coating in Standard and Custom Colors,” Dryvit Systems, Inc., 1990, 1 page. |
Katz et al., “Handbook of Fillers for Plastics,” 1987, pp. 441. (2 pages). |
Metallic Demandit, “Interior/Exterior Acrylic Coating with a Metallic Appearance,” Dryvit Systems, 1989, 1 page. |
Quarzite, “Exterior and Interior Quartz Aggregate Finish,” Dryvit Systems, 1991, 1 page. |
Sacks et al., “Light Weight Aggregate Composition,” Office Action, dated Nov. 23, 2010, for U.S. Appl. No. 12/508,384, 8 pages. |
Sacks et al., “Lath With Barrier Material,” Office Action, dated Aug. 25, 2010, for U.S. Appl. No. 11/679,562, 12 pages. |
Sacks et al., “Lath With Barrier Material,” Supplemental Amendment, filed Jun. 15, 2010, for U.S. Appl. No. 11/679,562, 5 pages. |
Sacks et al., “Lath With Barrier Material,” Amendment, filed Apr. 29, 2010, for U.S. Appl. No. 11/679,562, 4 pages. |
Sacks et al., “Lath With Barrier Material,” Office Action, dated Feb. 3, 2010, for U.S. Appl. No. 11/679,562, 15 pages. |
Sacks et al., “Energy Efficient Building Environmental Control Apparatus and Method,” Office Action, dated Jul. 8, 2011, for U.S. Appl. No. 12/847,923, 17 pages. |
Sacks et al., “Energy Efficient Building Environmental Control Apparatus and Method,” Preliminary Amendment, filed Sep. 15, 2010, for U.S. Appl. No. 12/847,923, 11 pages. |
Sacks et al., “Twin Track Wire Lath,” Notice of Allowance, dated Jul. 26, 2007, for U.S. Appl. No. 10/663,419, 5 pages. |
Sacks et al., “Twin Track Wire Lath,” Amendment, filed Jun. 18, 2007, for U.S. Appl. No. 10/663,419, 6 pages. |
Sacks et al., “Twin Track Wire Lath,” Office Action, dated Apr. 10, 2007, for U.S. Appl. No. 10/663,419, 9 pages. |
Sacks et al., “Twin Track Wire Lath,” Amendment, filed Mar. 9, 2007, for U.S. Appl. No. 10/663,419, 10 pages. |
Sacks et al., “Twin Track Wire Lath,” Office Action, dated Feb. 9, 2007, for U.S. Appl. No. 10/663,419, 9 pages. |
Sacks et al., “Twin Track Wire Lath,” Amendment, filed Dec. 4, 2006, for U.S. Appl. No. 10/663,419, 22 pages. |
Sacks et al., “Twin Track Wire Lath,” Office Action, dated Sep. 5, 2006, for U.S. Appl. No. 10/663,419, 15 pages. |
Sacks et al., “Twin Track Wire Lath,” Supplemental Amendment, filed Nov. 17, 2005, for U.S. Appl. No. 10/663,419, 19 pages. |
Sacks et al., “Twin Track Wire Lath,” Amendment, filed Nov. 12, 2005, for U.S. Appl. No. 10/663,419, 12 pages. |
Sacks et al., “Twin Track Wire Lath,” Office Action, dated Sep. 12, 2005, for U.S. Appl. No. 10/663,419, 10 pages. |
Sacks et al., “Twin Track Wire Lath,” Office Action, dated Feb. 9, 2005, for U.S. Appl. No. 10/663,419, 10 pages. |
Sacks et al., “Twin Track Wire Lath,” Amendment, filed Oct. 25, 2004, for U.S. Appl. No. 10/663,419, 14 pages. |
Sacks et al., “Twin Track Wire Lath,” Office Action, dated Jun. 7, 2004, for U.S. Appl. No. 10/663,419, 12 pages. |
Sacks et al., “Light-Weight Metal Stud and Method of Manufacture,” Notice of Allowance, dated Oct. 17, 2013, for U.S. Appl. No. 13/767,764, 21 pages. |
Sacks et al., “Light-Weight Metal Stud and Method of Manufacture,” U.S. Appl. No. 14/812,952, filed Jul. 29, 2015, 39 pages. |
Sacks et al., “Light-Weight Metal Stud and Method of Manufacture,” Office Action, dated Jan. 11, 2016, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/812,952, 14 pages. |
Sacks et al., “Light-Weight Metal Stud and Method of Manufacture,” Amendment, filed Apr. 8, 2016, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/812,952, 20 pages. |
Sacks et al., “Light-Weight Metal Stud and Method of Manufacture,” Office Action, dated May 2, 2016, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/812,952, 28 pages. |
Spilchen et al., “Reinforcing Insert Article, Kit and Method,” Office Action, dated Mar. 18, 2016, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/795,731, 17 pages. |
International Search Report, Mailed Sep. 30, 2016, for International Application No. PCT/CA2016/050900, 3pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150345150 A1 | Dec 2015 | US |