1. Field
The present disclosure relates to tires for driving on ice comprising studs (“studded tires”).
2. Description of Related Art
Studded tires have undeniable advantages in terms of how they behave under winter driving conditions, for example when driving on an icy road surface. Contact with the ice, and more particularly the way in which the stud digs into the ice compensates for the reduction in grip observed at the tread pattern of the tire tread. The studs scratch the ice and generate additional forces on the ice.
One of the difficulties in using studded tires is that the grip values reach their upper limit at values that are inferior to those that could be expected.
In order to overcome this difficulty, it has been proposed (see, for example patent applications WO 2009/147046 and WO 2009/147047) to provide grooves or cavities in the tread, near the stud, so that any shavings or particles of ice that are generated when the stud scratches the ice can be removed more quickly. As these shavings are removed more quickly, the thickness of the interface between the tread surface of the tire and the surface of the ice is reduced, which in turn increases the effective protrusion (or depth to which the ice is scratched) and results in a more positive anchorage in the ice and appreciably improves performance in terms of grip on ice.
While this approach has allowed a significant improvement in the grip of a tire comprising studs for driving on ice, there is still some room to improve the compromise between the level of grip on ice and stud retention when the tire is used on asphalt.
One of the objectives of embodiments of the present invention is to improve the compromise between the level of grip achieved by the studs on ice and stud retention when the tire used on asphalt.
This objective is achieved using an embodiment that includes a tire designed to roll on ground that may be covered with ice, comprising:
According to a first advantageous embodiment, the maximum depth of the cavity is less than or equal to HA/2, where HA is the depth of the housing containing the stud. Depths greater than HA/2 in fact lead to impaired stud retention.
According to a second advantageous embodiment, at least one bridge of rubber compound connecting the anchoring platform for the stud to the remainder of the tread passes across and through the cavity. This traverse of the cavity can be described as being such as locally to reduce the depth of the cavity. The existence of such a bridge improves the retention of the studs on ground that is tarmacked, wet, covered with snow and/or with ice.
For preference, the number of bridges of rubber compound passing through the cavity is greater than 1, which makes it possible to improve the anchoring of the stud in several directions perpendicular to the radial direction.
For preference, the number of such bridges of rubber compound is greater than or equal to 3 and the bridges are evenly distributed about the stud.
In one particularly advantageous configuration, the number of bridges evenly distributed about the stud is equal to 6. This number is high enough to guarantee good stud retention even in case one of the bridges became severed.
The bridges of rubber compound may intersect with the tread surface of the tire in the as-new (unworn) condition, or they may have no intersection with the tread surface of the tire in the as-new (unworn) condition.
For preference, the bridges of rubber compound have a rounded geometry, which reduces the risk of cracks spreading towards the inside of the tread.
According to a third preferred embodiment, the cavity surrounding the anchoring platform for the stud narrows as a function of depth.
The person skilled the art will understand that it is possible, and often desirable to combine several, or even all, of the embodiments mentioned hereinabove.
In the use of the term “radial” it is appropriate to make a distinction between the many various usages made of that word by the person skilled in the art. First of all, the expression refers to a radius of the tire. It is with that meaning that a point P1 is said to be “radially inside” a point P2 (or “radially on the inside of” the point P2) if it is closer to the axis of rotation of the tire than is the point P2. Conversely, a point P3 is said to be “radially outside” a point P4 (or “radially on the outside of” the point P4) if it is further away from the axis of rotation of the tire than is the point P4. Progress is said to be “radially inwards (or outwards)” when in the direction of smaller (or larger) radii. Where radial distances are concerned, it is this meaning of the term that applies also.
By contrast, a thread or a reinforcement is said to be “radial” when the thread or the reinforcing elements of the reinforcement make with the circumferential direction an angle that is greater than or equal to 80° and less than or equal to 90°. Let it be emphasized that, in this document, the term “thread” is to be understood in an entirely general sense and covers threads in the form of monofilaments, multi-filaments, a cord, a folded yarn or an equivalent assembly and irrespective of the material of which the thread is made or of the surface treatment it may have received in order to enhance its bonding with the rubber.
Finally, a “radial section” or “radial cross section” here means a section or cross section in a plane that contains the axis of rotation of the tire.
An “axial” direction is a direction parallel to the axis of rotation of the tire. A point P5 is said to be “axially inside” a point P6 (or “axially on the inside of” the point P6) if it is closer to the mid-plane of the tire than is the point P6. Conversely, a point P7 is said to be “axially outside” a point P8 (or “axially on the outside of” the point P8) if it is further away from the mid plane of the tire than is the point P8. The “mid plane” of the tire is the plane perpendicular to the axis of rotation of the tire and which lies at equal distances between the annular reinforcing structures of each bead. When it is said that, in any radial cross section, the mid plane divides the tire into two tire “halves”, that does not mean that the mid plane necessarily constitutes a plane of symmetry of the tire. The expression “tire half” here has a broader meaning and denotes a portion of the tire that is of an axial width close to half the axial width of the tire.
A “circumferential” direction is a direction which is perpendicular both to a radius of the tire and to the axial direction.
The “tread surface” of a tread here denotes all of the points of the tread which come into contact with the ground when the tire—inflated to its service pressure and without studs—is rolling on the ground.
In the context of this document, the expression “rubber compound” denotes a compound of rubber containing at least one elastomer and a filler.
The other end of the stud 30 is formed of a base 70 which is designed to anchor the stud 30 in the tread 20 of the tire 10.
A body 80 connects the first part 60 and the base 70 of the stud 30. The mean diameter DC of the body is smaller than the mean diameter DT of the base 70 of the stud 30, these diameters being measured perpendicular to the axis 33 of the stud. The body 80 is separated from the base 70 by a part 85 the diameter of which is smaller than the diameters of the base and of the body.
The rubber block 40 comprises a stud having a longitudinal axis 33 (see
While this type of studded tire has allowed a significant improvement in grip on ice, there is still room to improve the compromise between the level of grip on ice and stud retention when the tire is used on asphalt. Such an improvement is obtained using a tire according to an embodiment of the invention, a portion of the tread of which is depicted in
First, the volume of recess opening onto the tread surface in a radius greater than or equal to D0/2 (which here corresponds to the contour of the stud 30 on the tread) and less than or equal to D0/2+2 mm (indicated using the circle 142) about the longitudinal axis of the stud is less than or equal to 20 mm3 (For the stud depicted, D0 is equal to 6.5 mm) This condition corresponds to there being enough of an anchoring platform to anchor the stud firmly in the tread. There may be small cavities in this part, but in order not to compromise the anchoring significantly, these must not be voluminous. The applicant has found that a volume of 20 mm3 is a value not to be exceeded. The small cavities are depicted on the surface visible in
Second, the volume of recess opening onto the tread surface in a radius greater than or equal to D0/2+2 mm (indicated using the circle 142) and less than or equal to D0/2+4 mm (indicated using the circle 144) about the longitudinal axis of the stud is greater than or equal to 60 mm3 and less than or equal to 100 mm3 (in this particular instance, the volume is 80 mm3) This condition corresponds to there being a cavity capable of holding a certain amount of ice shavings at a sufficiently small distance away from the axis of the stud.
For preference, the maximum depth H of the cavity is less than or equal to HA/2, where HA is the depth of the housing containing the stud (see
According to one advantageous embodiment, at least one bridge of rubber compound connecting the anchoring platform for the stud to the remainder of the tread passes across and through the cavity.
In this particular instance, the bridges do not intersect with the tread surface of the tire in the as-new condition, but it is also possible to provide bridges that do intersect with the tread surface in the as-new condition. The cavity surrounding the anchoring platform can in fact be formed of a plurality of cavities, each of which opens onto the tread surface. This is depicted in
The bridges visible in
Table 1 compares the results obtained with a studded tire that has no ice reservoir (“A”), used as reference, a studded tire according to WO 2009/147047 (“B”) and a tire according to an embodiment of the invention (“C”). The architecture of the tire and the materials used were the same for all three tires.
It may be seen that while solution “B” improves the grip on ice at the expense of stud retention, solution “C” improves both the grip on ice (even though not by as much as solution “B”) and especially improves stud retention; it therefore makes a very significant improvement to the overall grip/retention compromise.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1162122 | Dec 2011 | FR | national |
This application is a 371 national phase entry of PCT/EP2012/075613, filed 14 Dec. 2012, which claims benefit of FR 1162122, filed 21 Dec. 2011, and of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/610,282, filed 13 Mar. 2012, the entire contents of each of which are incorporated herein by reference for all purposes.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2012/075613 | 12/14/2012 | WO | 00 | 6/17/2014 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61610282 | Mar 2012 | US |