Stuttering treatment methods and apparatus

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 7974845
  • Patent Number
    7,974,845
  • Date Filed
    Friday, February 15, 2008
    16 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, July 5, 2011
    12 years ago
Abstract
Stuttering treatment methods and apparatus which utilize removable oral-based appliances having actuators which are attached, adhered, or otherwise embedded into or upon a dental or oral appliance are described. Such oral appliances may receive the user's voice and process the voice to introduce a time delay and/or a frequency shift. The altered audio feedback signal is then transmitted back to the user through a tooth, teeth, or other bone via a vibrating actuator element. The actuator element may utilize electromagnetic or piezoelectric actuator mechanisms and may be positioned directly along the dentition or along an oral appliance housing in various configurations.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to methods and apparatus for treating stuttering via altered auditory feedback. More particularly, the present invention relates to methods and apparatus for treating stuttering by transmitting a user's voice which has been altered via bone conduction through teeth or bone structures in and/or around the mouth.


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

The causes of stuttering are not fully understood but researchers believe that it may be caused by interference between the left and right hemispheres of the brain competing against one another to send signals to the muscles used to produce speech. These conflicting signals ultimately impair the muscles resulting in stuttering, which is typically characterized by interruptions in speech flow, repetitions, prolongations, and pauses in speech.


The treatments for stuttering are varied and include methods such as psychological therapy, drug, therapy, and altered auditory feedback (AAF). Most AAF treatments can be divided into three categories: delayed auditory feedback (DAF), frequency-shifted auditor, feedback (FAF), and masked auditory feedback (MAF). Treatment using DAF typically utilizes a user's own voice which is delayed between 50 to 200 ms and then relayed back to the user, usually through headphones or an earpiece. This type of treatment relies on the “choral effect”, which occurs when people who stutter speak or sing in unison with others, experience a dramatic reduction or even elimination of stuttering.


Treatments using FAF are based on changing the frequency characteristics of the user's voice by, about a half octave such that the relayed auditory feedback sounds somewhat distorted to the speaker. This frequency shift is believed to effect the user's brain in the same manner as DAF treatment. The MAF treatment involves generating a synthetic sine signal corresponding to the user's own phonetic frequency and relaying this masking feedback to the user.


These treatments usually involve placing a device within the ear canal of the user to completely or partially obstruct the opening much like air-conduction hearing aids. However, such devices are intended to be left in place even when the user is not talking and will also obstruct ambient noises that the user may wish to hear. Moreover, such in-ear devices (as well as other external devices) are usually visible to others and may thus be a deterrent for use by some users for aesthetic reasons. Other devices utilizing such treatments are placed upon a post which is permanently implanted into the skull of the user. However, such devices require invasive surgery and present various complications which may occur as a result.


Accordingly, there exists a need for methods and apparatus for receiving and processing a user's voice and effectively transmitting these processed signals back to the user with minimal obstruction.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

An electronic device may be attached, adhered, or otherwise embedded into or upon a removable dental or oral appliance to form an assembly which may conduct audio signals to a user via vibratory conduction through bone. Such a removable oral appliance may be a custom-made device fabricated from a thermal forming process utilizing a replicate model of a dental structure obtained by conventional dental impression methods. The electronic assembly may receive incoming sounds either directly or through a receiver to process and amplify the signals and transmit the processed sounds via a vibrating actuator element coupled to a tooth or other bone structure, such as the maxillary, mandibular, or palatine bone structure.


In using an oral appliance assembly, the oral appliance may utilize altered auditory feedback (AAF) for the treatment of stuttering. Accordingly, in one example of treating stuttering via delayed auditory feedback (DAF) and/or frequency-shifted auditory feedback (FAF), the user's own voice may be received via a microphone located upon the oral assembly or separately from the oral appliance. The user's voice may then be processed such that the voice data is delayed by about, e.g., 60 ms. The delay in the auditory feedback may alternatively range anywhere from about 50 ms to 200 ms.


In addition to delaying the auditory feedback, the auditory feedback signal may also be shifted in frequency by about, e.g., +500 Hz. In other variations, the frequency may be shifted anywhere from less than a half octave to a full octave or more, depending upon the desired results. With the auditor, feedback delayed and shifted in frequency, the signal may be further adjusted or equalized to account for the user's particular bone conduction profile, which may be obtained utilizing standard bone conduction measurements. Accounting for the user's bone conduction profile, particularly through the skull, may facilitate optimization of the altered auditory feedback signal by adjusting particular frequencies or adjusting amplitude or gain such that the vibrationally conducted altered feedback signal reaches the user's middle and/or inner ear with minimal loss.


Once the altered feedback signal has been appropriately adjusted for delay, frequency, bone conduction, etc., it may be vibrationally transmitted via the removable oral appliance through the user's tooth or teeth or other bone structure such as the palatal or mandibular bone, etc. Thus, as the user speaks their voice is sampled and adjusted, as described above, and then retransmitted via the removable oral appliance to effect AAF treatment and to reduce or eliminate stuttering.


The assembly for transmitting vibrations via at least one tooth may generally comprise a housing having a shape which is conformable to at least a portion of the at least one tooth, and an actuator disposed within or upon the housing and in vibratory communication with a surface of the at least one tooth. Moreover, the actuator itself may be a separate assembly from the electronics and may be positioned along another surface of the tooth, such as the occlusal surface, or even attached to an implanted post or screw embedded into the underlying bone.


The actuator utilized in the actuator assembly may be an electromagnetic or piezoelectric actuator. Piezoelectric transducers in particular may be used in various configurations due in part to the various vibrational modes which may be utilized to transmit the acoustic signals as vibrations through a tooth or teeth. Any number of actuator may be utilized for particular applications. For instance, low voltage multi-layer piezoelectric actuator manufactured by Morgan Electro Ceramics Ltd. (Wrexham, England) may be utilized for the applications described herein.


Aside from actuator and housing assemblies which are positioned along or against one or more teeth, actuator assemblies may be alternatively mounted along a retainer-like structure configured for placement adjacent or along the palate of the user. An arch may extend between coupling portions which are configured to extend from the arch for placement against the lingual surfaces of teeth on opposite sides of the user's dentition. Rather than utilizing actuator assemblies directly upon the teeth, the actuator may be removably or permanently integrated along the arch such that elongational vibration of the actuator conducts the vibrations along the arch for transmission through the coupling portions and into the user's teeth. Alternatively, one or more actuators may be positioned along the arch and actuated to directly conduct vibrations through the user's palatal bone.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 illustrates the dentition of a patient's teeth and one variation of an oral appliance which is removably placed upon or against the patient's tooth or teeth.



FIG. 2A illustrates a perspective view of the lower teeth showing one exemplary location for placement of the removable oral appliance.



FIG. 2B illustrates another variation of the removable oral appliance in the form of an appliance which is placed over an entire row of teeth in the manner of a mouthguard.



FIG. 2C illustrates another variation of the removable oral appliance which is supported byes arch.



FIG. 2D illustrates another variation of all oral appliance configured as a mouthguard.



FIG. 3 illustrates a detail perspective view of the oral appliance positioned upon the patient's teeth utilizable in combination with a transmitting assembly external to the mouth and wearable by the patient in another variation of the device.



FIG. 4 shows an illustrative configuration of one variation of the individual components of the oral appliance device having an external transmitting assembly with a receiving and actuator assembly within the mouth.



FIG. 5 shows an illustrative configuration of another variation of the device in which the entire assembly is contained by the oral appliance within the user's mouth.



FIG. 6 illustrates an example of low multiple oral appliance assemblies or actuators may be placed on multiple teeth throughout the patient's mouth.



FIG. 7 illustrates another variation of a removable oral appliance supported by an arch and having a microphone unit integrated within the arch.



FIG. 8A illustrates another variation of the removable oral appliance supported by a connecting member which may be positioned along the lingual or buccal surfaces of a patient's row of teeth.



FIGS. 8B to 8E show examples of various cross-sections of the connecting support member of the appliance of FIG. 8A.



FIG. 9 shows yet another variation illustrating at least one microphone and optionally additional microphone units-positioned around the user's mouth and in wireless communication with the electronics and/or actuator assembly.



FIG. 10 illustrates a flowchart of an optional treatment for altering a user's voice to be retransmitted back to the user through bone conduction via the removable oral appliance.



FIGS. 11A and 11B illustrate flow charts for alternative treatments for altering the user's voice for retransmission back to the user.



FIG. 12 illustrates a graph indicating a correlation between an increase in the delay of the auditory feedback and the number of stuttering events.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

In treating stuttering, methods and apparatus may utilize altered auditory feedback (AAF) treatments. For instance, the most commonly used treatments may include use of delayed auditory feedback (DAF) and/or frequency-shifted auditor) feedback (FAF). A user's own voice may be modified by delaying the retransmission of the voice back to the user and the voice may also be modified in frequency prior to its retransmission. Rather than utilizing an in-ear device, which obstructs the ear canal, or a device which is coupled to a post implanted in the user, the user's voice may be processed and transmitted via bone conduction through an unobstructive and removable oral appliance.


The removable oral appliance may contain an electronic and actuator device attached, adhered, or otherwise embedded into or upon the oral appliance or other oral device to form an assembly which may conduct audio signals to the user via vibratory, conduction through bone. Such an oral appliance may be a custom-made device fabricated from a thermal forming, process utilizing a replicate model of a dental structure obtained by conventional dental impression methods. The electronic and actuator assembly may receive incoming sounds, such as the user's own voice, either directly or through a receiver to process and amplify the signals and transmit the processed sounds via a vibrating actuator element coupled to a tooth or other bone structure, such as the maxillary, mandibular, or palatine bone structure.


Detailed examples and descriptions of the oral appliance and methods of use are more full), described in the following U.S. patent application Ser. Nos. 11/672,239 filed Feb. 7, 2007; 11/741,648 filed Apr. 27, 2007; and 11/754,823 and 11/754,833 both filed May 29, 2007. Each of these applications is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.


As shown in FIG. 1, a patient's mouth and dentition 10 is illustrated showing one possible location for removably attaching the oral appliance assembly 14 upon or against at least one tooth, such as a molar 12. The patient's tongue TG and palate PL are also illustrated for reference. An electronics and/or actuator assembly 16 may be attached, adhered, or otherwise embedded into or upon the assembly 14, as described below in further detail.



FIG. 2A shows a perspective view of the patient's lower dentition illustrating the assembly 14 comprising a removable oral appliance 18 and the electronics and/or actuator assembly 16 positioned along a side surface of the assembly 14. In this variation, oral appliance 18 may be fitted upon two molars 12 within tooth engaging channel 20 defined by oral appliance 18 for stability upon the patient's teeth, although in other variations, a single molar or tooth may be utilized. Alternatively, more than two molars may be utilized for the oral appliance 18 to be attached upon or over. Moreover, electronics and/or actuator assembly 16 is shown positioned upon a side surface of oral appliance 18 such that the assembly 16 is aligned along a buccal surface of the tooth 12; however, other surfaces such as the lingual surface of the tooth 12 and other positions may also be utilized. The figures are illustrative of variations and are not intended to be limiting; accordingly, other configurations and shapes for oral appliance 18 are intended to be included herein.



FIG. 2B shows another variation of a removable oral appliance in the form of an appliance 15 which is placed over an entire row of teeth in the manner of a mouthguard. In this variation, appliance 15 may be configured to cover an entire bottom row of teeth or alternatively an entire upper row of teeth. In additional variations, rather than covering the entire rows of teeth, a majority of the row of teeth may be instead be covered by appliance 15. Assembly 16 may be positioned along one or more portions of the oral appliance 15.



FIG. 2C shows yet another variation of an oral appliance 17 having an arched configuration. In this appliance, one or more tooth retaining portions 21, 23, which in this variation may be placed along the upper row of teeth, may be supported by an arch 19 which may lie adjacent or along the palate of the user. As shown, electronics and/or actuator assembly 16 may be positioned along one or more portions of the tooth retaining portions 21, 23. Moreover, although the variation shown illustrates an arch 19 which may cover only a portion of the palate of the user, other variations may be configured to have an arch which covers the entire palate of the user.



FIG. 2D illustrates yet another variation of all oral appliance in the form of a mouthguard or retainer 25 which may be inserted and removed easily from the user's mouth. Such a mouthguard or retainer 25 may be used in sports where conventional mouthguards are worn; however, mouthguard or retainer 25 having assembly 16 integrated therein may be utilized by persons, stutterers, hearing impaired or otherwise, who may simply hold the mouthguard or retainer 25 via grooves or channels 26 between their teeth for receiving instructions remotely and communicating over a distance.


Generally, the volume of electronics and/or actuator assembly 16 may be minimized so as to be unobtrusive and comfortable to the user when placed in the mouth. Although the size may be varied, a volume of assembly 16 may be less than 800 cubic millimeters. This volume is, of course, illustrative and not limiting as size and volume of assembly 16 and may be varied accordingly between different users.


Moreover, removable oral appliance 18 may be fabricated from various polymeric or a combination of polymeric and metallic materials using any number of methods, such as computer-aided machining processes using computer numerical control (CNC) systems or three-dimensional printing processes, e.g. stereolithography apparatus (SLA), selective laser sintering (SLS), and/or other similar processes utilizing three-dimensional geometry of the patient's dentition, which may be obtained via any number of techniques. Such techniques may include use of scanned dentition using intra-oral scanners such as laser, white light, ultrasound, mechanical three-dimensional touch scanners, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), computed tomography (CT), other optical methods, etc. Examples for manufacturing the oral appliance are described in further detail in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/841,477 filed Aug. 20, 2007, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.


In forming the removable oral appliance 18, the appliance 18 may be optionally formed such that it is molded to fit over the dentition and at least a portion of the adjacent gingival tissue to inhibit the entry of food, fluids, and other debris into the oral appliance 18 and between the actuator assembly and tooth surface. Moreover, the greater surface area of the oral appliance 18 may facilitate the placement and configuration of the assembly 16 onto the appliance 18.


Additionally, the removable oral appliance 18 may be optionally fabricated to have a shrinkage factor such that when placed onto the dentition, oral appliance 18 may be configured to securely grab onto the tooth or teeth is the appliance, 18 may have a resulting size slightly smaller than the scanned tooth or teeth upon which the appliance 18 was formed. The fitting, may result in a secure interference fit between the appliance 18 and underlying dentition.


In one variation, with assembly 14 positioned upon the teeth, as shown in FIG. 3, an extra-buccal transmit ter assembly 22 located outside the patient's mouth may be utilized to receive auditory signals for processing and transmission via a wireless signal 24 to the electronics and/or actuator assembly 16 positioned within the patient's mouth, which may then process and transmit the processed auditory signals via vibratory conduction to the underlying tooth and consequently: to the patient's inner ear.


The transmitter assembly 22, as described in further detail below, may contain a microphone assembly as well as a transmitter assembly and may be configured in any number of shapes and forms worn by the user, such as a watch, necklace, lapel, phone, belt-mounted device, etc.



FIG. 4 illustrates a schematic representation of one variation of oral appliance assembly 14 utilizing an extra-buccal transmitter assembly 22, which may generally comprise microphone or microphone array 30 (referred to “microphone 30” for simplicity) for receiving sounds and which is electrically connected to processor 32 for processing the auditory signals. Processor 32 may be connected electrically to transmitter 34 for transmitting the processed signals to the electronics and/or actuator assembly 16 disposed upon or adjacent to the user's teeth. The microphone 30 and processor 32 may be configured to detect and process auditory signals in any practicable range, but may be configured in one variation to detect auditory signals ranging from, e.g., 50 Hertz to 20000 Hertz.


With respect to microphone 30, a variety of various microphone systems may be utilized. For instance, microphone 30 mat be a digital, analog, and/or directional type microphone. Such various types of microphones may be interchangeably configured to be utilized with the assembly, if so desired. Moreover, various configurations and methods for utilizing multiple microphones within the user's mouth may also be utilized, as further described below.


Power supply 36 may be connected to each of the components in transmitter assembly 22 to provide power thereto. The transmitter signals 24 may be in any wireless form utilizing, e.g. radio frequency, ultrasound, microwave. Blue Tooth® (BLUETOOTH SIG, INC., Bellevue, Wash.), etc. for transmission to assembly 16. Assembly 22 may also optionally include one or more input controls 28 that a user may manipulate to adjust various acoustic parameters of the electronics and/or actuator assembly 16, such as acoustic focusing, volume control, filtration, muting, frequency optimization, sound adjustments, and tone adjustments, etc.


The signals transmitted 24 by transmitter 34 may be received by electronics and/or actuator assembly 16 via receiver 38, which may be connected to an internal processor for additional processing of the received signals. The received signals may be communicated to actuator 40, which may vibrate correspondingly against a surface of the tooth to conduct the vibratory signals through the tooth and bone and subsequently to, the middle ear to facilitate hearing of the user. Actuator 40 may be configured as any number of different vibratory mechanisms. For instance, in one variation, actuator 40 may be an electromagnetically actuated actuator. In other variations, actuator 40 may be in the form of a piezoelectric crystal having a range of vibratory frequencies, e.g., between 250 to 15,000 Hz.


Power supply 42 may also be included with assembly 16 to provide power to the receiver, actuator, and/or processor, if also included. Although power supply 42 may be a simple battery, replaceable or permanent, other variations may include a power supply 42 which is charged by inductance via an external charger. Additionally, power supply 42 may alternatively be charged via direct coupling to an alternating current (AC) or direct current (DC) source. Other variations may include a power supply 42 which is charged via a mechanical mechanism such as an internal pendulum or slidable electrical inductance charger as known in the art, which is actuated via. e.g., motions of the jaw and/or movement for translating the mechanical motion into stored electrical energy for charging power supply 42.


In another variation of assembly 16, rather than utilizing an extra-buccal transmitter, hearing aid assembly 50 may be configured as an independent assembly contained entirely within the user's mouth, as shown in FIG. 5. Accordingly, assembly 50 may include at least one internal microphone 52 in communication with an on-board processor 54. Internal microphone 52 may comprise any number of different types of microphones, as described below in further detail. At least one processor 54 may be used to process any received auditory signals for filtering and/or amplifying the signals and transmitting them to actuator 56, which is in vibratory contact against the tooth surface. Power supply 58, as described above, may also be included within assembly 50 for providing power to each of the components of assembly 50 as necessary.


In order to transmit the vibrations corresponding to the received auditory signals efficiently and with minimal loss to the tooth or teeth, secures mechanical contact between the actuator and the tooth is ideally maintained to ensure efficient vibratory communication. Accordingly, any number of mechanisms may be utilized to maintain this vibratory communication.


For any of the variations described above, they may be utilized as a single device or in combination with any other variation herein as practicable, to achieve the desired hearing level in the user. Moreover, more than one oral appliance device and electronics and/or actuator assemblies may be utilized at any one time. For example, FIG. 6 illustrates one example where multiple actuator-assemblies 60, 62, 64, 66 may be placed on multiple teeth. Although shown oil the lower row of teeth, multiple assemblies may alternatively be positioned and located along the upper row of teeth or both rows as well. Moreover, each of the assemblies may be configured to transmit vibrations within a uniform frequency range. Alternatively in other variations, different assemblies may be configured to vibrate within overlapping or non-overlapping frequency ranges between each assembly. As mentioned above, each actuator 60, 62, 64, 66 can be programmed or preset for a different frequency response such that each actuator may be optimized for a different frequency response and/or transmission to deliver a relatively high-fidelity sound to the user.


Moreover, each of the different actuators 60, 62, 64, 66 can also be programmed to vibrate in a manner which indicates the directionality of sound received by the microphone worn by the user. For example, different actuators positioned at different locations within the user's mouth can vibrate in a specified manner by providing sound or vibrational queues to inform the user which direction a sound was detected relative to an orientation of the user, as described in further detail below. For instance, a first actuator located. e.g., on a user's left tooth, can be programmed to vibrate for sound detected originating from the user's left side. Similarly, a second actuator located. e.g., on a user's right tooth, can be programmed to vibrate for sound detected originating from the user's right side. Other variations and queues may be utilized as these examples are intended to be illustrative of potential variations.



FIG. 7 illustrates another variation 70 which utilizes an arch 19 connecting one or more tooth retaining portions 21, 23, as described above. However, in this variation, the microphone unit 74 may be integrated within or upon the arch 19 separated from the actuator assembly 72. One or more wires 76 routed through arch 19 may electrically connect the microphone unit 74 to the assembly 72. Alternatively, rather than utilizing a wire 76, microphone unit 74 and assembly 72 may be wirelessly coupled to one another, as described above.



FIG. 8A shows another variation 80 which utilizes a connecting member 82 which may be positioned along the lingual or buccal surfaces of a patient's row of teeth to connect one or more tooth retaining portions 21, 23. Connecting member 82 mat be fabricated from any number of nontoxic materials, such stainless steel, Platinum, etc. and affixed or secured 84, 86 to each respective retaining portions 21, 23. Moreover, connecting member 82 may be shaped to be as non-obtrusive to the user as possible. Accordingly, connecting member 82 may be configured to have a relatively low-profile for placement directly against the lingual or buccal teeth surfaces. The cross-sectional area of connecting member 82 may be configured in any number of shapes so long as the resulting, geometry is non-obtrusive to the user. FIG. 8B illustrates one variation of the cross-sectional area which may be configured as a square or rectangle 90. FIG. 8C illustrates another connecting member geometry configured as a semi-circle 92 where the flat portion may be placed against the teeth surfaces. FIGS. 8D and 8E illustrate other alternative shapes such as an elliptical shape 94 and circular shape 96. These variations are intended to be illustrative and not limiting as other shapes and geometries, as practicable, are intended to be included within this disclosure.


In yet another variation for separating the microphone from the actuator assembly, FIG. 9 illustrates another variation where at least one microphone 102 (or optionally any number of additional microphones 104, 106) may be positioned within the mouth of the user while physically separated from the electronics and/or actuator assembly 100. In this manner, the one or optionally more microphones 102, 104, 106 may be wirelessly or by wire coupled to the electronics and/or actuator assembly 100 in a manner which attenuates or eliminates feedback from the actuator, also described in further detail below.


In utilizing multiple actuators and/or processing units, several features may be incorporated with the oral appliance(s) to effect any number of enhancements to the quality of the conducted vibrators signals and/or to emulate various perceptual features to the user to correlate auditory signals received by a user for transmitting these signals via bone conduction through teeth or bone structures in and/or around the mouth. Examples of various processing methods and systems for simulating directionality as well as for processing algorithms for filtering out undesirable signals, among other features, are shown and described in further detail in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/672,239 filed Feb. 7, 2007, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. The features shown and described mats be utilized with any of the variations described herein and in any number of combinations as practicable.


In using any of the variations of the oral appliance assembly described herein, the oral appliance may utilize AAF for the treatment of stuttering, as illustrated in one example in the flow chart of FIG. 10. Accordingly, in one example of treating stuttering via DAF and FAF, the user's own voice may be received via a microphone 100 located upon the oral assembly or separately from the oral appliance. The user's voice may then be processed, e.g., by processor 54, such that the voice data is delayed 112 by about, e.g., 60 ms. The delay in the auditory feedback may alternatively range anywhere from about 50 ms to 200 ms.


In addition to delaying the auditory feedback, the auditory feedback signal may also be shifted in frequency 114 by about, e.g., +500 Hz. In other variations, the frequency may be shifted anywhere from less than a half octave to a full octave or more, depending upon the desired results. With the auditory feedback delayed and shifted in frequency, the signal may be further adjusted or equalized to account for the user's particular bone conduction profile 116, which may be obtained utilizing standard bone conduction measurements. Accounting for the user's bone conduction profile, particularly through the skull, may facilitate optimization of the altered auditory feedback signal by adjusting particular frequencies or adjusting amplitude or gain such that the vibrationally conducted altered feedback signal reaches the user's middle and/or inner ear with minimal loss.


Once the altered feedback signal has been appropriately adjusted for delay, frequency, bone conduction, etc., it may be vibrationally transmitted via the removable oral appliance 118 through the user's tooth or teeth or other bone structure such as the palatal or mandibular bone, etc. Thus, as the user speaks their voice is sampled and adjusted, as described above, and then retransmitted via the removable oral appliance to effect AAF treatment and to reduce or eliminate stuttering.


In other variations, rather than utilizing both DAF and FAF in altering the auditory feedback signal, DAF treatment may be utilized alone, as illustrated in the flowchart of FIG. 11A. In this example, the user's voice signal 110 may be delayed 112, as above by 60 ms or anywhere from 50 ins to 200 ms. The delayed auditory feedback signal may then be further adjusted to account for the user's bone conduction profile 116 and then the resulting feedback signal may be transmitted via vibrational conduction 118 through the removal oral appliance. In yet another variation, rather than utilizing DAF treatment, FAF treatment may be utilized alone, as illustrated in the flowchart of FIG. 11B. In this case, the user's voice signal 110 may be shi fled in frequency 114 by, e.g., +500 Hz, and then further adjusted for the user's bone conduction profile 116 and then transmitted via vibration conduction 118 through the removal oral appliance. In these and other examples, adjustment of the user's auditory feedback signal by their (or a standard) bone conduction profile 116 may be performed prior to adjustment of the delay or frequency shift.


In determining the amount of delay to adjust the auditory feedback signal, it may be delayed anywhere from about 50 ms to 200 ms, as mentioned above. As shown in chart 120 in FIG. 12, curve 122 illustrates the relationship between an increase in delayed auditory feedback (in milliseconds) and a reduction in the number of stuttering events from the speaker. Generally, as the amount of delay in the auditory feedback is increased, the number of stuttering events decreases exponentially, particularly delay times of 25 ms or greater.


The applications of the devices and methods discussed above are not limited to the treatment of hearing loss but may include any number of further treatment applications. Moreover, such devices and methods may be applied to other treatment sites within the body. Modification of the above-described assemblies and methods for carrying out the invention, combinations between different variations as practicable, and variations of aspects of the invention that are obvious to those of skill in the art are intended to be within the scope of the claims.

Claims
  • 1. A method for treating stuttering, comprising: providing an oral appliance comprising a housing and an actuatable transducer disposed within or upon the housing;positioning the housing onto the at least one tooth, wherein the housing is configured to engage the at least one tooth without requiring anatomical modification of the at least one tooth and without bonding to the at least one tooth, wherein the appliance produces an interference fit between the appliance and at least two surfaces of the at least one tooth;receiving an audio signal of a voice of the patient;introducing a time delay in the audio signal of the patient's voice to generate an altered audio feedback signal; andvibrationally conducting the altered audio feedback signal from the oral appliance to a surface of the at least one tooth whereby stuttering by the patient is diminished.
  • 2. The method of claim 1 wherein receiving an audio signal comprises sampling the audio signal via one or more microphones within the oral appliance.
  • 3. The method of claim 1 wherein introducing a time delay comprises introducing the time delay via a processor in communication with the oral appliance.
  • 4. The method of claim 3 wherein the processor is integrated within the oral appliance.
  • 5. The method of claim 3 wherein the processor is separated from the oral appliance.
  • 6. The method of claim 3 wherein introducing the time delay comprises delaying the audio signal of the patient's voice from 50 ms to 200 ms.
  • 7. The method of claim 1 further comprising shifting a frequency of the audio signal prior to vibrationally conducting the altered audio feedback signal.
  • 8. The method of claim 7 wherein shifting a frequency comprises shifting the frequency by 500 Hz.
  • 9. The method of claim 1 further comprising adjusting the altered audio feedback to accommodate a bone conduction profile of the patient prior to vibrationally conducting the altered audio feedback signal.
  • 10. The method of claim 1 wherein vibrationally conducting comprises further conducting through a palatal bone of the patient via the oral appliance.
  • 11. The method of claim 1 further comprising removing the oral appliance from patient.
  • 12. A stuttering treatment apparatus, comprising: a housing that is configured to engage at least a portion of at least one tooth of a patient without requiring anatomical modification of the at least one tooth and without bonding to the at least one tooth, wherein the apparatus produces an interference fit between the apparatus and at least two surfaces of the at least one tooth;a processor positioned within or along the housing, wherein the processor is configured to introduce a time delay in an audio signal of a voice of the patient to generate an altered audio feedback signal; andan actuator disposed within or upon the housing and configured to transmit vibrations to a surface of the at least one tooth such that the actuator conducts the altered audio feedback signal whereby stuttering by the patient is diminished.
  • 13. The apparatus of claim 12 further comprising one or more microphones in communication with the processor for receiving the audio signal of the voice of the patient.
  • 14. The apparatus of claim 12 wherein the processor is configured to introduce a time delay of 50 ms to 200 ms.
  • 15. The apparatus of claim 12 wherein the processor is further configured to shift a frequency of the audio signal of the voice.
  • 16. The apparatus of claim 15 wherein the processor is configured to shift the frequency by 500 Hz.
  • 17. The apparatus of claim 12 wherein the processor is further configured to adjust the audio feedback to accommodate a bone conduction profile of the patient.
  • 18. The apparatus of claim 12 wherein the housing is removable from the at least one tooth.
  • 19. The apparatus of claim 12 further comprising an external controller in wireless communication with the processor.
US Referenced Citations (165)
Number Name Date Kind
2045404 Nicholides Jun 1936 A
2161169 Jefferis Jun 1939 A
2318872 Madiera May 1943 A
2977425 Cole Mar 1961 A
2995633 Puharich et al. Aug 1961 A
3156787 Puharich et al. Nov 1964 A
3170993 Puharich et al. Feb 1965 A
3267931 Puharich et al. Aug 1966 A
3325743 Blum Jun 1967 A
3787641 Santori Jan 1974 A
3894196 Briskey Jul 1975 A
3985977 Beaty et al. Oct 1976 A
4025732 Traunmuller May 1977 A
4150262 Ono Apr 1979 A
4498461 Hakansson Feb 1985 A
4591668 Iwata May 1986 A
4612915 Hough et al. Sep 1986 A
4642769 Petrofsky Feb 1987 A
4738268 Kipnis Apr 1988 A
4817044 Ogren Mar 1989 A
4832033 Maher et al. May 1989 A
4920984 Furumichi et al. May 1990 A
4982434 Lenhardt et al. Jan 1991 A
5012520 Steeger Apr 1991 A
5033999 Mersky Jul 1991 A
5047994 Lenhardt et al. Sep 1991 A
5060526 Barth et al. Oct 1991 A
5082007 Adell Jan 1992 A
5233987 Fabian et al. Aug 1993 A
5323468 Bottesch Jun 1994 A
5325436 Soli et al. Jun 1994 A
5372142 Madsen et al. Dec 1994 A
5402496 Soli et al. Mar 1995 A
5403262 Gooch Apr 1995 A
5447489 Issalene et al. Sep 1995 A
5455842 Merskey et al. Oct 1995 A
5460593 Mersky et al. Oct 1995 A
5546459 Sih et al. Aug 1996 A
5558618 Maniglia Sep 1996 A
5565759 Dunstan Oct 1996 A
5616027 Jacobs et al. Apr 1997 A
5624376 Ball et al. Apr 1997 A
5661813 Shimauchi et al. Aug 1997 A
5706251 May Jan 1998 A
5760692 Block Jun 1998 A
5800336 Ball et al. Sep 1998 A
5812496 Peck Sep 1998 A
5828765 Gable Oct 1998 A
5902167 Filo et al. May 1999 A
5914701 Gersheneld et al. Jun 1999 A
5961443 Rastatter et al. Oct 1999 A
5984681 Huang Nov 1999 A
6029558 Stevens et al. Feb 2000 A
6047074 Zoels et al. Apr 2000 A
6068590 Brisken May 2000 A
6072884 Kates Jun 2000 A
6072885 Stockham, Jr. et al. Jun 2000 A
6075557 Holliman et al. Jun 2000 A
6115477 Filo et al. Sep 2000 A
6118882 Haynes Sep 2000 A
6171229 Kroll et al. Jan 2001 B1
6223018 Fukumoto et al. Apr 2001 B1
6239705 Glen May 2001 B1
6333269 Naito et al. Dec 2001 B2
6377693 Lippa et al. Apr 2002 B1
6394969 Lenhardt May 2002 B1
6504942 Hong et al. Jan 2003 B1
6538558 Sakazume et al. Mar 2003 B2
6585637 Brillhart et al. Jul 2003 B2
6631197 Taenzer Oct 2003 B1
6633747 Reiss Oct 2003 B1
6682472 Davis Jan 2004 B1
6754472 Williams et al. Jun 2004 B1
6778674 Panasik et al. Aug 2004 B1
6826284 Benesty et al. Nov 2004 B1
6885753 Bank Apr 2005 B2
6917688 Yu et al. Jul 2005 B2
6941952 Rush, III Sep 2005 B1
6954668 Cuozzo Oct 2005 B1
6985599 Asnes Jan 2006 B2
7003099 Zhang et al. Feb 2006 B1
7033313 Lupin et al. Apr 2006 B2
7035415 Belt et al. Apr 2006 B2
7074222 Westerkull Jul 2006 B2
7076077 Atsumi et al. Jul 2006 B2
7099822 Zangi Aug 2006 B2
7162420 Zangi et al. Jan 2007 B2
7171003 Venkatesh et al. Jan 2007 B1
7171008 Elko Jan 2007 B2
7174022 Zhang et al. Feb 2007 B1
7206423 Feng et al. Apr 2007 B1
7246058 Burnett Jul 2007 B2
7258533 Tanner et al. Aug 2007 B2
7269266 Anjanappa et al. Sep 2007 B2
7271569 Oglesbee Sep 2007 B2
7310427 Retchin et al. Dec 2007 B2
7329226 Ni et al. Feb 2008 B1
7331349 Brady et al. Feb 2008 B2
7333624 Husung Feb 2008 B2
7361216 Kangas et al. Apr 2008 B2
7409070 Pitulia Aug 2008 B2
7486798 Anjanappa et al. Feb 2009 B2
7520851 Davis et al. Apr 2009 B2
7522738 Miller, III Apr 2009 B2
7522740 Julstrom et al. Apr 2009 B2
20010003788 Ball et al. Jun 2001 A1
20010051776 Lenhardt Dec 2001 A1
20020026091 Leysieffer Feb 2002 A1
20020071581 Leysieffer et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020077831 Numa Jun 2002 A1
20020122563 Schumaier Sep 2002 A1
20020173697 Lenhardt Nov 2002 A1
20030059078 Downs et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030091200 Pompei May 2003 A1
20030212319 Magill Nov 2003 A1
20040057591 Beck et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040131200 Davis Jul 2004 A1
20040141624 Davis et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040202339 O'Brien, Jr. et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040202344 Anjanappa et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040243481 Bradbury et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040247143 Lantrua et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050037312 Uchida Feb 2005 A1
20050067816 Buckman Mar 2005 A1
20050070782 Brodkin Mar 2005 A1
20050129257 Tamura Jun 2005 A1
20050196008 Anjanappa et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050241646 Sotos et al. Nov 2005 A1
20060008106 Harper Jan 2006 A1
20060025648 Lupin et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060064037 Shalon et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060167335 Park et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060270467 Song et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060275739 Ray Dec 2006 A1
20070010704 Pitulia Jan 2007 A1
20070036370 Granovetter et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070041595 Carazo et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070142072 Lassally Jun 2007 A1
20070230713 Davis Oct 2007 A1
20070242835 Davis Oct 2007 A1
20070265533 Tran Nov 2007 A1
20070276270 Tran Nov 2007 A1
20070280491 Abolfathi Dec 2007 A1
20070280492 Abolfathi Dec 2007 A1
20070280493 Abolfathi Dec 2007 A1
20070280495 Abolfathi Dec 2007 A1
20070286440 Abolfathi et al. Dec 2007 A1
20070291972 Abolfathi et al. Dec 2007 A1
20080019542 Menzel et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080019557 Bevirt et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080021327 El-Bialy et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080064993 Abolfathi et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080070181 Abolfathi et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080304677 Abolfathi et al. Dec 2008 A1
20090022351 Wieland et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090028352 Petroff Jan 2009 A1
20090052698 Rader et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090088598 Abolfathi Apr 2009 A1
20090097684 Abolfathi et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090097685 Menzel et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090099408 Abolfathi et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090105523 Kassayan et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090147976 Abolfathi Jun 2009 A1
20090149722 Abolfathi et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090180652 Davis et al. Jul 2009 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (37)
Number Date Country
0715838 Jun 1996 EP
0741940 Nov 1996 EP
0824889 Feb 1998 EP
1299052 Feb 2002 EP
1633284 Dec 2004 EP
1691686 Aug 2006 EP
1718255 Nov 2006 EP
1783919 May 2007 EP
2007028248 Feb 2007 JP
2007028610 Feb 2007 JP
2007044284 Feb 2007 JP
2007049599 Feb 2007 JP
2007049658 Feb 2007 JP
WO 8302047 Jun 1983 WO
WO 9102678 Mar 1991 WO
WO 9519678 Jul 1995 WO
WO 9621335 Jul 1996 WO
WO 0209622 Feb 2002 WO
WO 2004045242 May 2004 WO
WO 2004105650 Dec 2004 WO
WO 2005000391 Jan 2005 WO
WO 2005037153 Apr 2005 WO
WO 2005053533 Jun 2005 WO
WO 2006088410 Aug 2006 WO
WO 2006130909 Dec 2006 WO
WO 2007043055 Apr 2007 WO
WO 2007052251 May 2007 WO
WO 2007059185 May 2007 WO
WO 2007140367 Dec 2007 WO
WO 2007140368 Dec 2007 WO
WO 2007140373 Dec 2007 WO
WO 2007143453 Dec 2007 WO
WO 2008024794 Feb 2008 WO
WO 2008030725 Mar 2008 WO
WO 2009014812 Jan 2009 WO
WO 2009025917 Feb 2009 WO
WO 2009066296 May 2009 WO
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20090210231 A1 Aug 2009 US