The present invention relates to integrated circuits (ICs), such as interface circuits, that are designed having reduced feature sizes, for example, 0.13 μm. More particularly, the invention relates to ICs that include interfaces (such as input/output (I/O) circuits) that are capable of interfacing with comparatively high-voltage signals from other sources, for example a 3.3 volt IC interfacing with signals from a 5 volt IC, or any other disparate ranges. Moreover, the invention relates to integrated circuits in which the semiconductor devices are biased such that the stress across the gate-oxides and junctions, as well as the leakage currents, are maintained at tolerable levels.
The trend in CMOS-based processing technology is to produce integrated circuit (IC) cores having a higher density of semiconductor devices, such as transistors, and faster clock rates than their predecessors. I/O circuits, which electrically couple an IC core to external components, are accessed through I/O circuit pads that surround the IC core. The IC core and the I/O circuit pads are generally fabricated from the same processing technology. There is however no requirement that they comprise the same technology and hybrid circuits are known in the art. The inventive concepts herein are applicable to a variety of fabrication technologies.
The performance of the IC cores may generally be improved by shrinking the feature sizes of the semiconductor devices, for example field-effect transistors (FETs). Unfortunately, reducing the IC feature sizes may proportionally decrease the maximum operating voltage that the semiconductor devices within the IC can withstand. For example, an I/O circuit pad, fabricated from a CMOS process having 0.30 micron features, typically withstands a maximum operating voltage of about 3.6 volts. In such a case the maximum operating voltage of the I/O circuit pad is insufficient to drive the external components which have a higher voltage requirement, such as 5 volts. Furthermore, if the IC is interfaced with a greater than the maximum operating voltage, the IC may fail.
One way to attempt to resolve such requirements of circuits with mismatched voltage requirements is to increase the robustness of the fabrication process, for example by increasing the thickness of the gate-oxide layer of the semiconductor devices which comprise the IC circuitry. A thick gate-oxide layer may provide semiconductor devices, such as FETs, with the ability to support a higher voltage requirement. However, this voltage robustness is commonly accompanied by a decreases the performance of the IC, because the thick gate-oxide layer reduces the overall gain of the devices which comprise the IC. Reducing the gain minimizes the benefit which occurs by reducing the feature size.
Other attempts have included increasing the complexity of the CMOS fabrication process so there are multiple sets of devices where each set meets different voltage requirements. Each set of devices requires a different gate-oxide. Each additional gate-oxide requires a separate mask. The resulting hybrid process may significantly increase the manufacturing costs of the IC.
One way to avoid the drawbacks of the aforementioned processing-based solutions is to use a “level-shift” chip as an external component. The IC core and the I/O circuits are fabricated from the same process. The “level-shift chip” may be fabricated from a process that supports the discrete voltage requirement by stepping up the core output signals to support the discrete voltage range and stepping down the external drive signals to support the IC core voltage range. Such a level-shift chip can be a waste of much needed space on a crowded printed circuit board and may degrade performance.
An I/O circuit that transforms voltages between different voltage levels without degrading the overall performance of the integrated circuit and maximizing use of space on the printed circuit board or multi-chip substrate may be beneficial. It would be a further benefit if such an I/O circuit could use voltages presented at the I/O circuit in order to provide such protective biasing.
Commonly an I/O power supply may vary +/−10% and may vary significantly more during transient conditions. When the I/O power supply varies, circuits may have higher stress on the gate-oxides of the devices in the I/O circuit, such stresses may not be desirable in many process technologies. It may be desirable to provide bias voltages to various devices in the I/O circuit such that the device gate-oxide is protected from high-voltages under various conditions of operation even when the power-supply voltage varies by a large amount.
Embodiments of the present invention may be optimized, for example where 5 volt input tolerance is required, even when the power supplies are varying in steady state by +/−10%.
Embodiments of the present invention are illustrated in an optimized form for I/O circuits where a 5 volt +/−10% input tolerance is required for normal operating range. Additionally the inventive concepts herein are described in terms of CMOS (Complimentary Metal Oxide Semiconductor) integrated circuits. Those skilled in the art will readily appreciate the fact that techniques described with respect to CMOS ICs are readily applicable to any circuits having disparate power supply and/or drive signal requirements for different portions of the circuitry. The CMOS example chosen is one likely to be familiar to those skilled in the art. There is, however, no intent to limit the inventive concepts to CMOS ICs as the techniques are equally applicable to a wide variety of integrated circuit fabrication techniques.
An exemplary embodiment of the invention includes an integrated circuit having a four device input output circuit in a push pull configuration. Two of the devices, termed upper devices, comprise PMOS (P-Channel Metal Oxide Semiconductor) devices and two of the devices, termed lower devices, comprise NMOS (N-channel Metal Oxide Semiconductor) devices. The devices are biased to eliminate hazardous voltages across device junctions and to reduce the magnitude of the voltage being passed on to the core circuitry. The biases are derived from the input output state of the circuit and the voltage presented to the I/O circuit connection (VPAD) Additionally PMOS device well bias voltage may be developed based on VPAD.
Other features and advantages of the invention will become apparent from a description of the following figures, in which like numbers refer to similar items throughout.
In deep submicron fabrication, the component integrated devices can tolerate only limited differential voltages across their junctions. Commonly the voltage which can be tolerated across the junctions is on the order of 2.5 Volts.
In the Illustration of
During the operation of input output circuit 404. in an output mode (when pad 309 is in an output driving mode), wells 400 and 402 are coupled to VDDO. When the pad 309 is in an input mode, the well voltage depends upon the pad voltage. In the output enable mode Vwell=VDDO.
When input output circuit 404 is in an input mode (when pad 309 is in an input mode), Vwell depends on both the input (Pad) voltage VPAD and VDDO. If VPAD is less than VDDO when input output circuit 404 in the input mode then Vwell=VDDO. If VPAD is greater than VDDO then Vwell=VPAD. A graph of this relationship is illustrated in
When I/O circuitry 600 is in the input mode, first bias circuit 407 ties gate 403 of device 301 to VDDO. In the output mode device 301 is controlled by an input from first bias circuit 407 according to whether a high or low value is being output on the pad 309.
In the input mode second bias circuit 405 provides gate voltage VGP1 to the gate of output device 303. The gate voltage VGP1 provided to the gate of output device 303 varies from an intermediate power supply voltage, such as VDDC being equal to 1.2 volts, and the pad voltage presented to the circuit at input output pad 309. Such biasing prevents device 303 from being damaged due to a voltage potential across its junctions.
To summarize the operation of the circuit of
When the circuit 600 is in not in output mode, that is in the tri-state or input mode then upper PMOS device 301 and lower NMOS device 307 are turned off and devices 303 and 305 are turned on to divide the voltages of the output circuit.
The gate voltage of the upper NMOS device 305 is controlled by third bias circuit 409. Third bias circuit 409, when in an input or tristate mode, will increase the base voltage when the pad voltage increases beyond a certain threshold, for example VDDP equal to 2.5 Volts.
Fourth bias circuit 411 works in a similar fashion to first bias circuit 407. Both bias circuits 407 and 411 work in a digital mode, either providing a first or second voltage depending on the required I/O pad 309 output voltage. In a first mode of operation first bias circuit 407 switches between a first voltage VDDO and a second lower voltage VDDC. Gate bias circuit 411 switches between providing VDDP and ground potential to the gate of device 307.
One facet of the I/O system comprising devices 301, 303, 305 and 307 is that any number of such devices may be added in parallel, in order to provide any level of drive signals needed.
In
As an example, assume that VDDO is initially zero volts. Zero volts at the gate of device 1209 turns it on. In such case point 1211 charges to a potential close to the pad voltage, since device 1213 is off. Point 1211 is coupled to the gate of device 1214 thereby turning device 1214 off. Since VDDO is zero volts, PMOS device 1219 turns on, which leads the gate of device 1207 being coupled to Bias_Mid. This leads to coupling the pad voltage, minus the threshold voltage of devices 1201, 1203, 1205 and 1207 to Bias_Mid. When VDDO is low, device 1215 provides a current leakage path for Bias_Mid to VDDC or VDDP. When VDDO is low, string 1217 turns on and the pad voltage is coupled to Bias_Mid. Devices 1220, 1221, 1223 and 1225 act as protection for device 1209 in the instance where the VPAD is high and VDDO is low.
When VDDO is high, point 1211 is tied to Bias_Mid because device 1213 turns on. When VDDO is high, device 1219 is turned off and device 1213 is turned on, thus raising the potential at the base of device 1207 to VPAD, thereby turning device 1207 off. Also device 1215 turns off when VDDO is high.
Similarly device 1301 is coupled between the pad and P_Gate, the gate of PMOS device 303 shown in
ΔV_bm, transient=(Cgd/(Cgd+Cbm)*ΔV_pad, transient.
Also, when transient voltages appear, the voltage VGP1 on PMOS 207 gate changes momentarily due to the gate to drain overlap capicitance (Cgdp) of the driver PMOS. A capacitance (Cgp) is placed at the PMOS 207 gate node such that the transient voltage at the pad (V_pad,transient) gets divided between Cgdp and Cgp depending on the ratio of the capacitances which gives the additional transient voltage on PMOS 207 gate (VGP1+transient):
Δ(VGP1+transient)=(Cgdp/(Cgdp+Cgp))*Δ(V_pad,transient).
When the I/O pad 309 is in an output enabled mode (i.e. OE is high) the maximum pad voltage is VDDO−VGP1 at the gate of PMOS device 303 is coupled to VDDC through NMOS transistors 1101 and 1801 and accordingly PMOS device 303 is turned on. Block 901 generates an output Bias_1 voltage of VDDC and accordingly PMOS device 907 is turned on, the steady state voltage of Bias_Mid is VDDP and PMOS device 905 is turned off.
When the I/O pad 309 is output disabled (i.e. OE is low) and the pad voltage is below a predetermined value, then VGP1 at the gate of PMOS 303 is floating if the pad voltage is below VDDO. Block 901 generates a output Bias_1 voltage of VDDC and accordingly PMOS device 907 is turned on, the steady value of Bias_Mid voltage is VDDP, and PMOS device 905 is turned-off in this condition.
When the I/O pad 309 is output disabled (i.e. OE is low) and the pad voltage is above a predetermined value, then block 901 generates an output Bias_1 voltage of VDDO and accordingly PMOS device 907 is turned-off, PMOS device 905 is is turned on, and the steady state value of Bias_Mid is between (VDDO−VTp) as a minimum value and (VDDP+Vt) as a maximum value, where VTp and Vt are offset voltages due to the turn on threshold voltages of transistors 905 and 909b respectively. VGP1, at the gate of PMOS device 303 is coupled to the pad voltage if the pad voltage is greater than VDDO.
Capacitors Cbm and Cgp in
This application is a continuation of application Ser. No. 10/621,005; filed Jul. 16, 2003, now issued as U.S. Pat. No. 6,949,964, which is a divisional of application Ser. No. 10/043,788, filed Jan. 9, 2002, now issued as U.S. Pat. No. 6,628,149; which claimed the priority to and benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/260,582, filed Jan. 9, 2001, entitled “Sub-Micron, high input voltage tolerant I/O circuit”, which is herby incorporated by reference as though set forth in full, and is related to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/043,763, filed on Jan. 9, 2002, now issued as U.S. Pat. No. 6,847,248. This application also claims priority to and benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/260,580, filed Jan. 9, 2001, entitled “Sub-Micron, high input voltage tolerant I/O circuit with power management support”, which is hereby incorporated by reference as though set forth in full.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4473758 | Huntington | Sep 1984 | A |
4484244 | Avery | Nov 1984 | A |
4556804 | Dewitt | Dec 1985 | A |
4617473 | Bingham | Oct 1986 | A |
4649292 | Rusznyak | Mar 1987 | A |
4686388 | Hafner | Aug 1987 | A |
4806789 | Sakihama et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
5170078 | Hsueh et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5184031 | Hayakawa et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5208488 | Takiba et al. | May 1993 | A |
5350951 | Adachi | Sep 1994 | A |
5506535 | Ratner | Apr 1996 | A |
5528447 | McManus et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5570043 | Churchill | Oct 1996 | A |
5654858 | Martin et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5719525 | Khoury | Feb 1998 | A |
5721508 | Rees | Feb 1998 | A |
5736833 | Farris | Apr 1998 | A |
5781034 | Rees et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5844425 | Nguyen et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5852375 | Byrne et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5909142 | Kawasaki et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5914626 | Kim et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5933025 | Nance et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5933027 | Morris et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
6005413 | Schmitt | Dec 1999 | A |
6018257 | Hung et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6031394 | Cranford, Jr. et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6054888 | Maley | Apr 2000 | A |
6078487 | Partovi et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6081132 | Isbara | Jun 2000 | A |
6081412 | Duncan et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6097237 | Singh | Aug 2000 | A |
6130556 | Schmitt et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6140846 | Chan et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6147846 | Borg | Nov 2000 | A |
6160428 | Pasqualini | Dec 2000 | A |
6194944 | Wert | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6351157 | Sharpe-Geisler | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6362652 | Oner et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6388475 | Clark et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6429716 | Drapkin et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6577163 | Waldrip et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6600346 | Macaluso | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6639772 | Chuang et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6738242 | Kwong et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
WO 0038322 | Jun 2000 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050248892 A1 | Nov 2005 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60260582 | Jan 2001 | US | |
60260580 | Jan 2001 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10043788 | Jan 2002 | US |
Child | 10621005 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10621005 | Jul 2003 | US |
Child | 11182646 | US |