The disclosure herein relates generally to electronic communications, and more particularly to coding and decoding received data in electronic communications.
Transferring information between computers and other electronic devices can be implemented using any of a variety of different standards and technologies. Channel coding and error correction techniques can be used to reduce errors in received signals introduced from distortion and other disturbances. Such coding and error correction can be implemented using an encoder and a decoder at the ends of the transmission channel.
One increasingly popular communication standard is 10 Gigabit Ethernet, with a nominal data rate of 10 Gbit/s. 10GBASE-T is one such standard used to provide 10 gigabit per second connections over unshielded or shielded twisted pair cables.
As shown in
The resulting frame is mapped to 128-DSQ symbols, and the resulting DSQ symbols are then precoded using THP. Each of these 512 128-DSQ symbols are then transmitted as a pair of PAM-16 symbols (x-axis and y-axis), to create 1024 symbols (3584 bits). The constellation for 128-DSQ symbols is shown in
The receiver unscrambles a received frame and decodes the coded bits. Any of several decoding algorithms for LDPC codes can be used in the receiver to decode the received coded bits. For example, iterative decoders are often used to converge on a correct decoded value. In one implementation, LDPC decoding is performed in the receiver using a soft-decision, message-passing algorithm. The bits are treated as continuous variables which represent the probability of the value being a 0 or a 1, and the continuous variables are represented in the decoding algorithm as Log Likelihood Ratios (LLRs). The message passing algorithm sets the variable nodes to the soft receive LLRs, calculates the syndrome LLRs given the variable LLRs, updates the variable LLRs with the new syndrome information, and iterates in this same way until a convergence is reached (e.g., check bits are zero). Using the 10GBASE-T transmission scheme, it is possible to have very low bit error rates that come very close to the Shannon limit of the communication channel.
While the transmission scheme described above works well for its intended applications, in some circumstances the link may be of a lower quality than anticipated, preventing the transceiver from communicating successfully at 10 Gb/s. The IEEE standard addresses the problem by requiring backwards compatibility to older Ethernet standards that communicate at rates of 1 Gb/s and/or 100 Mb/s. Thus, if the link is incapable of supporting 10 Gb/s, the transmission rate is scaled back to either 1 Gb/s or 100 Mb/s, or lower.
Scaling back the transmission rate in the conventional manner described above may unnecessarily limit the transmission rate far below what the link may be capable of supporting. For example, many industrial buildings and homes are wired with conventional CAT-5 cabling, which incorporates unshielded twisted-pair wires for older phone lines. CAT-5 cabling may in many cases support data rates between 5-10 Gb/s. Even if the cable is able to support 8 Gb/s, however, scaling back the data rate conventionally would dial down the transmission rate to 1 Gb/s, far below what could be supported.
Accordingly, what is needed is a system and method that provides more flexibility in scaling the data rates of 10GBASE-T Ethernet channels.
Embodiments of methods of signaling along a high-speed Ethernet link are disclosed. In one embodiment, a method of operation in a high-speed Ethernet transceiver is disclosed. The transceiver is rated to communicate data at a maximum data rate and for coupling to a link. The method includes engaging in an autonegotiation process with a link partner transceiver to indicate whether one or more sub-rate modes of operation are supported. Each sub-rate mode of operation corresponds to a sub-data rate that is less than the maximum data rate. The autonegotiation process is terminated. The transceiver then participates in a training process. The training process includes receiving a first training sequence corresponding to a first sub-data rate that is less than the maximum data rate. A signal quality parameter for the received first training sequence is measured. The training sequence is terminated based on the measured signal quality parameter failing a predetermined criteria. A second training sequence is then initiated that corresponds to a second sub-data rate that is less than the first sub-data rate without starting a second autonegotiation process.
Transmitter Processing
Further referring to
Following the constellation configuration step, the data symbols are then modulated, at step 408, and precoded by a THP precoder, at step 410. The precoded symbols may then be transmitted by the 10GBASE-T transceiver, at step 412. One specific example of a 10GBASE-T transceiver architecture capable of carrying out the coding and decoding functionality described herein is disclosed in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/563,938, titled “Cancellation of Alien Interference in Communication Systems”, assigned to the Assignee of the present disclosure, and expressly incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
Further referring to
In one embodiment, a set of lanes is determined that support a high link performance, with a minimum number of lanes, and with as many of them operating in a simplex mode as possible. This generally involves pruning lanes based on SNR margins, at step 506, and selecting a set with a maximum number of lanes operating in simplex mode, at step 508.
In an effort to flexibly reduce the 10GBASE-T data rate for impaired and/or low-power applications, and without the necessity of dropping the data rate by 90%,
To reduce the data rates even further, one or more coded bits may be removed from the symbol.
for other signaling purposes such as in-band communication, updating THP coefficients during normal link operation, and so forth.
Receiver Processing
In order to keep the analog front-end of the 10GBASE-T transceivers relatively unchanged, the average power of the impaired mode constellations is kept roughly equal to the default 128-DSQ constellation. In order to do this, at the receiver, the different constellation mappings are translated appropriately in accordance with method steps more fully described below.
Determining the LLRs for decoding the coded bits during the bit slicing method is generally carried out through an analysis of decision thresholds at Magnitude modulo 4. Once the coded points have been decoded by the LDPC decoder, the information needed to slice the uncoded bits is then available. The received point is mapped so that rounding via integer truncation will determine the correct coset. This involves mapping the line half-way between the decoded coset points so that it lies on an integer boundary. Generally, the 4-bit label assigned to each of the coset points maps to an integer location within the coset as:
(x,y)=({c0,c0⊕c1},{c2,c2⊕c3})
The 4-bit label above may be used in the following translation equation that translates a given received, mapped point so that the slicer boundaries are appropriately aligned:
“Slicer Input=Received, Mapped Point+(2,2)−({c0,c0⊕c1},{c2,c2⊕c3})
The slicer mapping consistent with the equation above may be used to establish slicing rules for the 128-DSQ symbols. Similar slicing rules may also be established in the same way for the other constellation modes.
As noted above, however, for data transmission of 4-SQ symbols, the LLRs for decoding the coded bits (2) can be directly calculated from the X and Y-axis PAM data. In one embodiment, transmissions at 4-SQ enable continuous training along the link during normal link operations. This enables real-time THP coefficient updates during normal operation without having to bring the link offline to carry out an initialization procedure.
Consistent with the initial translation step 906 in
The first step in the translation involves generally rotating the constellation by 45 degrees, such that the point originally residing at (15, 15) is zeroed along the x-axis, with a Y offset. The coordinate values are then scaled by a scaling factor. The result is a collection of points mapped in a diamond-shape, with the relationship to the transmit mapping being:
With the constellation having undergone an initial translation at the receiver side to undo the effects of the THP precoding, a further translation is performed to set the points up so that a bit slicer can straightforwardly decode the coded and uncoded bits in the constellation, the same way for different types of constellations. In other words, for different constellations, the different mappings result in a common or standard code region for the bit slicer. This allows a common bit slicer to decode the bits using a common decoding algorithm.
Further referring to
The aggregated information is then forward error encoded via an LDPC encoder 1810, which appends the aggregated information with a series of 325 LDPC check bits, at 1812. The resulting generated data structure takes the form of an LDPC transport frame.
With continued reference to
The symbols are then transmitted at a symbol rate of, for example, 500 Mega-symbols per second by a transmitter 1816 across plural physical channels CHN A, CHN B, CHN C and CHN D. The transmit symbol rate for one embodiment may be matched to the expected rated bandwidth (half the symbol rate) of the physical channels provided by the cable. Other data rates may be utilized by varying the symbol rate and/or the symbol mapping scheme. For example, by reducing the symbol rate to 250 MS/s (corresponding to a cable bandwidth of 125 MHz), a data rate of 2.5 Gbps may be realized. With the parameters specified above, the resulting data rate is 5.0 Gb/s, with an improved signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) due to the back-to-back PAM-8 signaling scheme. The scheme provides a way to enable 5.0 Gb/s data rates over lower quality cables, such as CAT-6, for distances on the order of 100 meters.
Further referring to
The aggregated information is then forward error encoded via an LDPC encoder 1910, which appends the aggregated information with a series of 325 LDPC check bits, at 1912. The resulting generated data structure takes the form of an LDPC transport frame.
Rate Pacing
It should be noted that the receive process described above may be applied in a manner that cooperates with a rate pacing scheme to manage the data rates between media access controllers (MACs) and corresponding physical layer (PHY) transceiver circuits. In one embodiment, a port-based PAUSE signaling scheme using buffers and internal MACs is employed. This allows a seamless integration with legacy equipment.
A further rate pacing embodiment involves use of a programmable ordered set to generate control signals that indicate XON and XOFF. Signaling on the SERDES interface for ordered sets can occur in Idle or prior to a Start of Frame marker. No additional bandwidth is consumed for PAUSE insertion.
An additional rate pacing embodiment employs an intra-packet idle frame that includes a group of eight bytes which are used solely for rate adaptation. The scheme involves a fixed counting method so that for every 8N bytes transmitted, a 65B Intra-Packet Idle (IPI) frame would be sent. One way to implement the process is to employ a counter that either adds a programmable increment A or subtracts a programmable decement B. If the value of the counter is greater than or equal to zero, the counter is decremented. Otherwise the counter is incremented. The net result is that the ratio of increments to decrements exactly matches the desired average. For example, for a desired 1.1 Gb/s interface across a SERDES interface, A may be set to 11 and B set to 89, and every time B is selected, data is allowed to flow. This gives exactly 1.1 Gb/s on a 10 Gb/s interface, optimally spread out. This scheme minimizes buffering and eliminates the requirement for MACs in the PHY.
Those having skill in the art will appreciate the many benefits and advantages afforded by the embodiments presented herein. Of significant benefit is the ability to reduce 10GBASE-T data rates without altering the transport frame structure. Further, by incorporating certain receive mappings corresponding to a given transmission mode, a common decoding and bit slicing scheme may be implemented at the receiver end of the channel. Additionally, by utilizing the info-field exchange mechanism in 10GBASE-T, sub-rate training sequences may be carried out quickly to arrive at a suitable sub-rate for data transmission without having to restart the 10GBASE-T autonegotiation process. This significantly reduces the time expended in determining a suitable sub-rate data rate.
In the foregoing description and in the accompanying drawings, specific terminology and drawing symbols have been set forth to provide a thorough understanding of the present invention. In some instances, the terminology and symbols may imply specific details that are not required to practice the invention. For example, any of the specific numbers of bits, signal path widths, signaling or operating frequencies, component circuits or devices and the like may be different from those described above in alternative embodiments. Also, the interconnection between circuit elements or circuit blocks shown or described as multi-conductor signal links may alternatively be single-conductor signal links, and single conductor signal links may alternatively be multi-conductor signal links. Signals and signaling paths shown or described as being single-ended may also be differential, and vice-versa. Similarly, signals described or depicted as having active-high or active-low logic levels may have opposite logic levels in alternative embodiments. Component circuitry within integrated circuit devices may be implemented using metal oxide semiconductor (MOS) technology, bipolar technology or any other technology in which logical and analog circuits may be implemented.
With respect to terminology, a signal is said to be “asserted” when the signal is driven to a low or high logic state (or charged to a high logic state or discharged to a low logic state) to indicate a particular condition. Conversely, a signal is said to be “deasserted” to indicate that the signal is driven (or charged or discharged) to a state other than the asserted state (including a high or low logic state, or the floating state that may occur when the signal driving circuit is transitioned to a high impedance condition, such as an open drain or open collector condition). A signal driving circuit is said to “output” a signal to a signal receiving circuit when the signal driving circuit asserts (or deasserts, if explicitly stated or indicated by context) the signal on a signal line coupled between the signal driving and signal receiving circuits. A signal line is said to be “activated” when a signal is asserted on the signal line, and “deactivated” when the signal is deasserted. Additionally, the prefix symbol “/” attached to signal names indicates that the signal is an active low signal (i.e., the asserted state is a logic low state). A line over a signal name (e.g., ″) is also used to indicate an active low signal. The term “coupled” is used herein to express a direct connection as well as a connection through one or more intervening circuits or structures. Integrated circuit device “programming” may include, for example and without limitation, loading a control value into a register or other storage circuit within the device in response to a host instruction and thus controlling an operational aspect of the device, establishing a device configuration or controlling an operational aspect of the device through a one-time programming operation (e.g., blowing fuses within a configuration circuit during device production), and/or connecting one or more selected pins or other contact structures of the device to reference voltage lines (also referred to as strapping) to establish a particular device configuration or operation aspect of the device. The term “exemplary” is used to express an example, not a preference or requirement.
While the invention has been described with reference to specific embodiments thereof, it will be evident that various modifications and changes may be made thereto without departing from the broader spirit and scope of the invention. For example, features or aspects of any of the embodiments may be applied, at least where practicable, in combination with any other of the embodiments or in place of counterpart features or aspects thereof. Accordingly, the specification and drawings are to be regarded in an illustrative rather than a restrictive sense.
This application claims the benefit of priority under 35 U.S.C. 119(e) to Regular application Ser. No. 13/966,208, filed Aug. 13, 2013, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,485,335, issued Nov. 1, 2016, entitled SUB-RATE CODES WITHIN THE 10GBASE-T FRAME STRUCTURE, which claims priority to Provisional Application No. 61/682,694, filed Aug. 13, 2012, entitled SUB-RATE CODES WITHIN THE 10GBASE-T FRAME STRUCTURE.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5680400 | York | Oct 1997 | A |
6052385 | Kanerva | Apr 2000 | A |
6081523 | Merchant et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6111890 | Rao | Aug 2000 | A |
6195360 | Raza et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
7027407 | Diepstraten et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7324511 | Nishihara | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7525992 | Shachal | Apr 2009 | B1 |
7567620 | Rozental | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7593431 | Lo et al. | Sep 2009 | B1 |
7693240 | Mezer | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7720075 | Costo | May 2010 | B2 |
7782852 | Tellado et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
8112646 | Tsai | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8201005 | Wertheimer et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8218612 | Chien | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8243752 | Barkan | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8276013 | Diab et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8320411 | Sedarat et al. | Nov 2012 | B1 |
9143142 | Meagher | Sep 2015 | B2 |
20020006167 | McFarland | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020119783 | Bourlas et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20030016797 | Zakrzewski | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030040298 | Heatley | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20040184810 | Spilman et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050018784 | Kurobe | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050030808 | Brown et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050055467 | Campana et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050058152 | Oksanen et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050105545 | Thousand et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050152466 | Maltsev et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050259685 | Chang et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050286521 | Chiang | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060109784 | Weller et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060153307 | Brown et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060215561 | Wang et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20070192505 | Dalmia | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070248024 | Conway et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080095188 | Remy | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080151792 | Taich | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080187028 | Lida | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080294919 | Lida et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090080459 | Barkan | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090150745 | Langner et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090282277 | Sedarat | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100075704 | McHenry et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100115295 | Diab | May 2010 | A1 |
20100188980 | Desai et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100241923 | Wang et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20110249687 | Diab et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20120026922 | Diab | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120063295 | Bliss | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120106345 | Diab | May 2012 | A1 |
20120170591 | Diab et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120188894 | Huschke et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20130070823 | Malkin et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20140040704 | Wu et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20150030337 | Mateosky | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150067380 | Zhan et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
Ken Christense et al., IEEE 802.3az The Road to Energy Efficient Ethernet, IEEE Communications Magazine, Nov. 2010, 7 Pages. |
Hugh Barrass, EEE Exchange of Management Information, IEEE 802.3az EEE Task Force, Mar. 2009, Vancouver, British Columbia, 11 Pages. |
Nariman Yousefi, Multi Rate PHY, IEEE Meeting Slides, Jul. 2003, 14 pages. |
Zhang et al; IEEE Apr. 2010; pp. 843-855; “An Efficient 10GBASE-T Ethernet LDPC Decoder Design with Low Error Floors”. |
Mankar et al.; ACEEE, Proc of Intl. Conf. on Recent Trends in Information, Telecommunication and Computing, ITC; 5 pages; “Algorithms and Architectures for Reduced Complexity LDPC Decoding”, 2014. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61682694 | Aug 2012 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13966208 | Aug 2013 | US |
Child | 14730083 | US |