SUBCHANNEL SECURITY AT THE OPTICAL LAYER

Abstract

The present invention includes various novel techniques, apparatus, and systems for optical WDM communications that involve dynamically modifying certain aspects of the WDM transmission (and corresponding receive) process at the optical (physical) layer to significantly enhance data/network security. These various dynamic modifications can be employed individually or in combination to provide even greater security depending upon the desired application and design tradeoffs. WDM transmission steps typically include encoding the client signals, mapping them to one or more subchannels within or across ITU channels, modulating them onto subcarrier frequencies, and multiplexing them together for optical transmission. By dynamically modifying one or more of these processing steps over time (in addition to any encryption of the underlying client signals), the current invention provides additional security at the physical (optical) layer of an optical network and thus greatly enhances overall network security.

Description

I. BACKGROUND

A. Field of Art

This application relates generally to optical communications based on optical wavelength-division multiplexing (WDM), and in particular to systems and techniques for security at the optical (physical) layer of the Open Systems Interconnection (OSI) Seven Layer Model.

B. Description of Related Art

Optical WDM communication systems transmit multiple optical channels at different WDM carrier wavelengths through a single fiber. The infrastructures of many deployed optical fiber networks today are based on 10 Gb/s per channel. As the demand for higher transmission speeds increases, there is a need for optical networks at 40 Gb/s, 100 Gb/s or higher speeds per channel.

WDM networks transmit client traffic from multiple sources over an optical fiber network. The traffic is multiplexed on the fiber by transmitting each signal with a laser set at a different channel on the International Telecommunication Union (ITU) channel plan defined in Standard G.692. Optical filters designed to function according to the ITU channel plan are used to demultiplex the signals and thereby direct each signal to its designated receiver. These standard ITU channels are hereinafter referred to simply as “channels.”

Various forms of subchannel modulation have been proposed as a means to reduce the dispersion penalties associated with high bit rate transmission in optical fibers (see, eg, WO 2009/105281) and increase spectral efficiency (see, eg, U.S. Pat. No. 6,525,857). These “subchannels” (eg, subchannels of ITU channels) are typically generated by microwave modulators or comb generators with a single laser. Examples of optical comb generators are described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/175,439, entitled “Optical Wavelength-Division Multiplexed (WDM) Comb Generator Using a Single Laser” and filed on Jul. 17, 2008, which is incorporated by reference herein. These subchannels are closely spaced relative to the source laser and are not independently tunable across a wide wavelength range, i.e. they are tuned in parallel as the source laser is tuned. Although an embodiment of one of the previously referenced patent applications (WO 2009/105281) proposes the use of more than one laser to generate the subchannels, such lasers are constrained to operate in parallel within a single ITU G.692 window.

Lower-rate subcarriers support a simplified upgrade of an installed DWDM network. For example, a legacy 2.5 Gb/s network may have transmitters with a reach of 600 km. When that network is upgraded to 10 Gb/s, dispersion compensators may have to be installed, since the reach of the 10 Gb/s transmitter may be only 80 km. Installing dispersion compensation and amplifiers to compensate for their loss can be very disruptive since operators may have to break the traffic multiple times and at multiple sites. If four subcarriers are used instead, with each subcarrier transmitting at 2.5 Gb/s to get 10 Gb/s composite bandwidth, they can have comparable dispersion-limited reach to the installed 2.5 Gb/s channels. The use of subcarriers therefore provides system operators with a means of upgrading an installed WDM network to increase the network capacity without having to change the dispersion map.

An improved implementation of subchannels (eg, using independently tunable lasers to generate independent subcarrier frequencies) is described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/961,432, filed Dec. 6, 2010, entitled “Subchannel Photonic Routing, Switching and Protection with Simplified Upgrades of WDM Optical Networks,” which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety. This implementation not only increases bandwidth and spectral efficiency by enabling multiple client circuits to be assigned to respective subchannels of a single ITU channel, but also allows those client circuits to be divided and/or combined with one another and assigned independently to subchannels within and across ITU channels. Such flexibility enables various routing, switching, concatenation and protection capabilities that allow system designers to fully realize the benefit of increasing the number of available optical circuits in a single fiber.

FIG. 1A shows an embodiment of a currently deployed WDM subchannel muxponder 100a in which client traffic (eg, 1 to N discrete client signals) is mapped onto corresponding subchannels. Client traffic is connected via a short-reach fiber interface to client interface transceivers 110a. These are typically pluggable devices such as an XFP [MSA standard http://www.xfpmsa.org/cgi-bin/msa.cgi], shown in client transceivers 110b in FIG. 1B, which may support one or more different client protocols (eg, Ethernet, SONET, Fibre Channel, etc). As will be discussed below in the context of the present invention, other standards (eg, SFP, CFP, etc) may also be employed separately or in combination.

After each optical signal is converted to an equivalent electrical signal, it can be processed digitally by FEC-SERDES block 120a to optionally (1) extract performance monitoring information, (2) add channel overhead for remote network management, and (3) encode the data for forward error correction.

In this embodiment, subcarrier multiplexing is employed (as described in U.S. Pat. No 6,525,857) to generate a group of subcarriers using a single laser (eg, via transceiver 140a) with a common wavelocker (λ-locker) 130a to maintain the stability of the subcarrier frequencies (subchannels). Subcarrier multiplexing would, of course, be unnecessary if only one client signal was supported per ITU channel. In other embodiments (as described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/961,432), each subchannel can have its own independently tuned and modulated laser, and each subcarrier can carry independent protocols. Moreover, there are no restrictions at the transmit side on the frequency spacing between subchannels, and each subchannel can be transmitted in a different ITU channel, and received via a corresponding independently tuned filter on the receive side.

In this embodiment, optical modulators/demodulators 135a modulate the laser generated via transceiver 140a (at each subcarrier frequency/wavelength within a single ITU channel) to produce modulated laser beams that carry the information from the respective lower speed electronic signals 122a. As will be discussed below in the context of the present invention, modulation of each subchannel can be selectively chosen to be one of many different types of modulation, such as Optical DuoBinary, Non-return to Zero, Differential Quadrature Phase Shift Keying, etc. Moreover, in the event that multiple subcarriers (ie, subchannels) are employed, different modulation schemes may be utilized across subchannels.

In this embodiment, the modulated signals generated by transceiver 140a consists of 1 to N subchannels that are combined by multiplexer 150a and then transmitted onto the transmission fiber. The transmitted light signal can be combined with light signals from other WDM transponders/muxponders (containing client signals carried on additional ITU channels) onto a single transmission fiber via an optical multiplexer (not shown). In other embodiments, one or more lasers may be employed to generate virtually any number of subchannels (within or across ITU channels).

On the receive side, the optical signal is received from the transmission fiber, filtered into individual ITU channels (filters also not shown), with each ITU channel being demultiplexed (eg, via demultiplexer 160a) into separate subchannels that are then converted back into equivalent electrical signals 122a by the receive circuitry in transceiver 140a. Note that external means may be required to select the particular wavelength that is being dropped, though this filter function can be integrated onto the same line card (see, eg, U.S. Pat. No. 6,525,857). The electrical signal from the line receiver can be processed digitally by FEC-SERDES block 120a to optionally (1) extract performance monitoring information, (2) drop the channel overhead for remote network management, and (3) correct errors according to the Forward Error Correction (FEC) algorithm. The client signals are then returned to the client equipment via their respective client-side transceivers 110a.

A slightly more detailed embodiment of the muxponder described in FIG. 1A is illustrated in FIG. 1B. In this embodiment, four XFP transceivers 110b are employed to interface with four discrete client signals which, as also noted above, could each carry a different client protocol (such as Ethernet, SONET, Fibre Channel, etc). Transceivers 110b communicate with four corresponding encoders/decoders in FEC-SERDES block 120b. In other embodiments, FEC-SERDES block 120b could share a fewer number of encoders/decoders (depending upon the application and the various protocols employed). These four encoded client signals 122b are transmitted to/from transceiver 140b (in this embodiment, combined with modulation/demodulation circuitry, shown separately as block 135a in FIG. 1A). Transceiver 140b generates four subcarrier signals (subchannels), utilizing common wavelocker 130b, which are combined by multiplexer 150b (and demultiplexed on the receive side via demultiplexer 160b) to interface with the line side of the transmission fiber.

As will be discussed below in the context of the present invention, the basic muxponder illustrated in FIGS. 1A and 1B can include various embodiments employing differing combinations of client signal protocols, client transceiver interface standards, modulation schemes, and optional subcarrier multiplexing with one or more fixed or independently tuned lasers (as well as fixed or tunable filters) to implement virtually any number of subchannels.

Regardless of which embodiment is employed, however, the client traffic remains potentially vulnerable to attack. For example, sophisticated eavesdroppers may tap the fiber, extract the information from a particular ITU channel (or subchannel) and attempt to decrypt the associated client signal (or portion thereof, if the client signal is divided among subchannels across multiple ITU channels).

Most existing security schemes for protecting client traffic in WDM networks involve encryption of data at the data link layer. Significantly enhanced security can be attained, however, by also securing the physical transmission of client traffic at the optical layer.

II. SUMMARY

Various embodiments of the current invention are disclosed herein, including techniques, apparatus, and systems for optical WDM communications that involve dynamically modifying certain aspects of the WDM transmission (and corresponding receive) process at the optical (physical) layer to significantly enhance data/network security. Moreover, these various dynamic modifications can be employed individually or in combination to provide even greater security depending upon the desired application and design tradeoffs.

WDM transmission involves processing client signals (each received at a particular line rate of transmission) to prepare them for transmission on a fiber optic cable of an optical network. As will be discussed below, these processing steps typically include encoding the client signals, mapping them to one or more subchannels within or across ITU channels, modulating them onto subcarrier frequencies, and multiplexing them together for optical transmission. By dynamically modifying one or more of these processing steps over time (in addition to any encryption of the underlying client signals), the current invention provides additional security at the physical (optical) layer of an optical network and thus greatly enhances overall network security.

For example, alternating scrambling/descrambling (encoding/decoding) schemes are employed, such as periodically alternating between G.709 and G.795 scramblers/descramblers. Client signal switching can also be employed dynamically to remap individual client signals to different subchannels within an ITU window. This is accomplished in one embodiment (following the scrambling/descrambling process) by buffering, switching, and resynchronizing the client signals before modulating them onto different subcarrier frequencies (subchannels).

The line rates of the client signals can also be altered dynamically (in one embodiment, after the dynamic switching has occurred) to mask the differences among the line rates of various standard protocols, such as Ethernet, SONET and Fibre Channel. These line rates can be normalized (eg, to the same line rate), or simply modified (increased or decreased) to impede detection of the protocol employed.

The particular ITU channel to which the subchannels are assigned can also be modified dynamically. In one embodiment, a laser is retuned dynamically to a different ITU channel window before modulating the client signals onto multiple subcarrier frequencies (subchannels). In other embodiments, separately tuned lasers can be employed, and client signals can even be moved independently of one another to any available subchannel within different ITU windows. In either case, one or more subchannel frequencies (carrying their corresponding client signals) are moved (dynamically, at various times) to a different ITU channel window, making isolation of a particular client signal over time quite difficult.

Moreover, the “lambda drift” of the subcarriers within a single ITU window can be altered dynamically, effectively shifting the subchannels together to occupy a slightly different portion of the ITU channel window. Even a shift of a few GHz could significantly impede an eavesdropper from isolating the client signal carried on a particular subchannel over time, not to mention the added complexity of tracking the signal's independent “movement” among those subchannels (or even to a different ITU channel) at different times.

The polarization of the subcarrier frequencies within an ITU channel can also be altered dynamically. For example, if four subchannels are employed, subchannels 1 and 3 might be polarized orthogonally to subchannels 2 and 4, with subchannels 1 and 3 oriented in a first direction, and subchannels 2 and 4 oriented in a second direction orthogonal to the first direction. Swapping the orientation of these subchannels dynamically will have a similar effect to remapping the client signals to different subcarrier frequencies. Polarization is, in essence, another dimension (orientation, as opposed to frequency) which, when changed, adds another variable to impede an eavesdropper's ability to isolate a particular client signal over time.

Finally, as alluded to above, different modulation schemes can be employed dynamically to one or more of the subchannels. Moreover, the modulation schemes can each be altered dynamically at different times in accordance with a different algorithm.

As noted above, these dynamic modifications can be employed individually or in combination to exponentially enhance the level of security by making it virtually impossible to isolate a particular client signal over time. An optical service channel (OSC) can be employed to communicate among the nodes of an optical network which of the various schemes is being employed, including the algorithms for making such modifications over time. Each node can therefore perform the appropriate modification (eg, remapping a client signal to a different subcarrier frequency) on the transmit side and, conversely, detect the modification (eg, receiving the client signal on the remapped subchannel) on the receive side.

Such modifications can be implemented under software control, or via dedicated hardware, and can be performed centrally (e.g., via a standard client-server EMS, or element management system, such as EMS 1140 illustrated in FIG. 11 of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/961,432) or in a distributed fashion at the devices that implement the various aspects of the WDM transmission process (scrambling, buffering, channel/subchannel assignment, polarization, modulation, laser frequency control, etc.).

III. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1A is a block diagram of a subchannel muxponder that employs a single laser to implement subcarrier multiplexing among 1 to N subchannels within an ITU window.

FIG. 1B is a block diagram of a slightly more detailed embodiment of the subchannel muxponder shown in FIG. 1A, which employs a client-side interface to four client signals via four corresponding XFP client transceivers, and the use of optical duo-binary (ODB) modulation to modulate the client signals into four subchannels.

FIG. 2 is a block diagram of an embodiment of the subchannel muxponder in which alternating scrambling/descrambling schemes (G.709 and G.795) are employed dynamically.

FIG. 3 is a block diagram of an embodiment of the subchannel muxponder containing a buffer and switch to dynamically remap the client signals to different subchannels over time.

FIG. 4 is a block diagram of an embodiment of the subchannel muxponder in which line rates of the client signals are altered dynamically to mask the differences among the line rates of various standard protocols.

FIG. 5 is a block diagram of an embodiment of the subchannel muxponder in which the ITU channel window containing the subcarrier frequencies (subchannels) is modified dynamically over time.

FIG. 6 is a block diagram of an embodiment of the subchannel muxponder in which the lambda drift of the subcarrier frequencies within an ITU channel is altered dynamically over time.

FIG. 7 is a block diagram of an embodiment of the subchannel muxponder in which the polarization of subcarrier frequencies is modified dynamically over time.

FIG. 8 is a block diagram of an embodiment of the subchannel muxponder in which the modulation scheme(s) employed to modulate the encoded client signals onto different subcarrier frequencies (subchannels) are modified dynamically over time.

FIG. 9 is a flowchart illustrating one embodiment of the present invention in which one or more aspects of the WDM transmission and receive processes, discussed with respect to FIGS. 2-8 above, are modified dynamically to provide security at the physical layer of an optical network.

IV. DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE CURRENT INVENTION

A. Alternating Scrambling/Descrambling Schemes

Turning to FIG. 2, subchannel muxponder 200 represents a modified embodiment of subchannel muxponder 100a of FIG. 1A, with the addition of G.709/975 Scrambler/Descrambler 250. As noted above, each client signal may be transmitted via any of various standard data protocols, such as Ethernet, SONET, Fibre Channel, etc. The digital processing of such client signals by FEC-SERDES block 120a of FIG. 1A involves a process of encoding each client signal into a standard frame structure for the transport of services over optical wavelengths in WDM systems. Different standard implementations of such frame structures include the G.709 and G.975 recommendations of the International Telecommunications Union (ITU-T).

In the embodiment illustrated in FIG. 2, G.709/975 Scrambler/Descrambler 250 causes the digital processing of client signals to alternate over time between using the G.709 standard and the G.975 standard. For example, in one embodiment, the G.709 standard is employed for a predetermined period of time whenever a network node initiates one or more client signals onto the optical network. When such time period expires, the G.975 standard is then used for a predetermined period of time. The two predetermined periods of time may or may not be equivalent. Moreover, a network node may alternate between the two standards based upon a condition other than the expiration of a predetermined time period, such as the detection of a potential intruder (eg, by monitoring the overall power level of the transmission fiber for a loss of power indicating a possible fiber cut or a tap of the fiber by an eavesdropper).

Should an eavesdropper be monitoring the fiber, the change from one framing standard to another (at times unknown to the eavesdropper) will make it difficult for the eavesdropper to detect and isolate a particular client signal over time. A receiving node, however, would receive information from the sending node (eg, via the OSC channel) identifying the algorithm for alternating among the standards, and thus would know which standard to use when attempting to decode the received client signal.

B. Remapping Client Signals Among Subchannels

In addition to periodically (or otherwise) alternating between standard framing structures, network nodes can dynamically remap individual client signals to different subchannels within an ITU window, as illustrated in FIG. 3. In one embodiment, following the scrambling/descrambling process, the encoded client signals from FEC-SERDES block 120 are buffered, switched and resynchronized, via Subchannel Switch 350 containing Buffer 350a and Switch 350b, before being modulated onto different subcarrier frequencies (subchannels).

Subchannel Switch 350 enables any permutation of the mapping of client signals to subchannels to be implemented dynamically over time, whether periodically or in accordance with a condition (such as the detection of a potential intruder). Moreover, the switching methodology (ie, which client signal is mapped to which subchannel) can be random, cyclical or in accordance with virtually any desired algorithm.

C. Protocol Line Rate Modification

Turning to FIG. 4, another dynamic modification to the transmission process involves modifying the line rate of one or more client signals, as illustrated by line rate modifier 450 which, in one embodiment, relies upon Buffer 350a (regardless of whether Switch 350b is employed to remap client signals dynamically to different subchannels). Because various standard protocols (eg, Ethernet, SONET and Fibre Channel) have slightly different line rates, this fact could make it easier for an eavesdropper to detect a particular client signal (eg, if the protocol were known). To mask these differences, a network node can periodically (or otherwise) modify the line rate of one or more client signals. Each individual line rate can be decreased or increased (eg, by buffering and/or padding frames of data), and, in one embodiment, client signals can all be normalized to the same line rate.

Regardless of the particular implementation of line rate modifier 450 (eg, the algorithms for determining which line rates to change, how they are changed and whether they are changed periodically or conditionally), the line rate of one or more client signals is modified over time before being modulated onto one or more subchannels. Here too, the change in line rates can occur separately or in combination with the other dynamic modifications discussed herein.

D. Moving Subchannels to Different ITU Windows

Turning to FIG. 5, wavelength modifier 550 can be employed to modify dynamically the particular ITU channel window to which the subcarrier frequencies (subchannels) are assigned. In one embodiment, a laser is retuned dynamically to a different ITU channel window before modulating the client signals onto multiple subcarrier frequencies (subchannels). As a result, whenever the ITU channel is changed, the client signals carried on the subcarrier frequencies are moved together as a group to a different ITU channel, making a potential eavesdropper's isolation of a particular client signal over time more difficult.

In other embodiments, separately tuned lasers can be employed for each subcarrier frequency (subchannel), whether within or across ITU channels. When combined with the remapping of client signals illustrated in FIG. 3, a client signal can “move” over time not only to a different subchannel within an ITU channel, but also to an entirely different ITU channel. Moreover, the dynamic algorithms determining the timing or conditions under which a client signal is remapped to a different subchannel within an ITU channel window, as compared to “moving” all of the subchannels from one ITU channel window to another, can be independent of each other.

E. Altering Subcarrier Frequency Lambda Drift

Turning to FIG. 6, lambda drift modifier 650 can be employed (in addition to the other dynamic modifications discussed herein) to introduce a shift in the subcarrier frequencies within an ITU window over time. For example, although the relative spacing of the subcarrier frequencies would remain constant, these subcarrier frequencies would shift (eg, a few GHz) within the range afforded by the particular ITU channel window. Even this slight change, particularly if modified in accordance with a pseudo-random or other algorithm over time, would be virtually impossible to detect, as the number of permutations would quickly grow exponentially.

F. Modifying Subcarrier Frequency Polarization

As illustrated in FIG. 7, polarization modifier 750 can be employed to alter the polarization of the subcarrier frequencies within an ITU channel dynamically. For example, if four subcarriers (subchannels) are generated by transceiver 140, yielding only two different polarization states (eg, subchannels 1 and 3 in one state with subchannels 2 and 4 in an orthogonal state), the number of permutations resulting from a relatively frequent periodic (or other change) in these states would nevertheless quickly increase exponentially. Moreover, when combined with the different dynamic modifications to the WDM transmission process discussed above, the strength of the overall network security is significantly enhanced.

G. Modifying Subcarrier Modulation Schemes

Finally, as illustrated in FIG. 8, modulation modifier 850 can be employed to dynamically alter the modulation scheme(s) implemented by modulators/demodulators 135. In other words, not only can each subchannel be generated using a different modulation scheme (eg, Optical DuoBinary, Non-return to Zero, Differential Quadrature Phase Shift Keying, etc), but the modulation scheme used to generate each subchannel may be changed periodically (or in accordance with virtually any algorithm) over time. In one embodiment, the algorithms that determine when to change modulation schemes differ per subchannel and are independent of one another. In other embodiments, these algorithms may be shared among one or more subchannels.

H. Dynamic Modification Process

Flowchart 900 in FIG. 9 illustrates one embodiment of the present invention in which one or more aspects of the WDM transmission and receive processes, discussed with respect to FIGS. 2-8 above, are modified dynamically to provide security at the physical layer of an optical network. Disregarding for a moment the dynamic modifications employed in the context of the present invention, each node performs the transmit and receive functions discussed above, including encoding or decoding client signals in step 910, buffering and synchronizing these signals at their various data rates in step 920, assigning these signals to (or filtering them from) ITU channels and subchannels (e.g., via switch 350b in FIGS. 3-8) in step 930, modulating ITU channels and subchannels onto (or demodulating them from) laser frequencies in step 960, and, finally, multiplexing and transmitting optical signals onto (or demultiplexing and receiving them from) fiber optic cables of an optical network in step 970.

In one embodiment, while these transmit and receive steps are occuring, the system is also determining continuously, in step 901, whether any conditions have been met that will result in the dynamic modification of one or more of these transmit and receive steps. As noted above, these dynamic modifications can be employed individually or in combination to exponentially enhance the desired level of security. They can be implemented under software control, or via dedicated hardware, and can be performed centrally or in a distributed fashion. Each node can therefore perform the appropriate modification (eg, remapping a client signal to a different subcarrier frequency) on the transmit side and, conversely, detect the modification (eg, receiving the client signal on the remapped subchannel) on the receive side.

In one embodiment, step 901 is performed (including the algorithms that determine whether the conditions triggering such modifications have been met) via software running on an EMS, the results of which are communicated to individual nodes via an OSC channel on the optical network. Step 901 is repeated until such time as a dynamic modification condition is met.

Once a dynamic modification condition is met, processing proceeds to step 905 to determine whether the condition relates to the encoding or decoding of client signals, such as alternating periodically between standard scrambling/descrambling schemes (e.g., the G.709 and G.975 standards). If so, the scrambling or descrambling scheme is modified dynamically in step 908 with respect to the subsequent encoding or decoding of client signals in step 910.

Note that multiple conditions may be met, even at the same time. So, whether or not the encoding/decoding condition is met in step 905 (and, if so, handled in step 908), processing also returns to step 915 to determine whether a condition relating to the data line rate is met. If so, then the data line rates of one or more client signals is modified dynamically in step 918 with respect to the subsequent buffering and synchronization (on the Tx or Rx side) of client signals in step 920.

Here too, whether or not the condition in step 915 is met, processing also returns to step 925 to determine whether a condition is met relating to the mapping or demapping of ITU channels and subchannels. If so, then such mapping or demapping assignments are modified dynamically in step 928 with respect to the subsequent mapping or demapping of ITU channels and subchannels in step 930.

Once again, whether or not the condition in step 925 is met, processing also returns to step 935 to determine whether a condition is met relating to lambda drift. If so, then a shift in the subcarrier frequencies within an ITU window is introduced in step 938. Depending on the timing of the conditions, processing also returns to steps 945 and 955, respectively (in order, in this embodiment) to determine whether a condition is met relating respectively to polarization and modulation schemes. Whether one or more of the conditions in steps 935, 945 and 955 are met (triggering lambda shifts in step 938, polarization state modifications in step 948 and changes in modulation schemes in step 958), processing proceeds to step 960 where these modifications are implemented during the modulation or demodulation of ITU channels and subchannels onto/from laser frequencies.

It should be noted that, in other embodiments, additional conditions could be included and the conditions could be checked and processed in combination as well as in a different order. Once all conditions have been checked, processing returns to step 901 to continue checking for dynamic modification conditions that may occur over time. Processing of transmit and receive functions (steps 910, 920, 930, 960 and 970) also continues in parallel.

It should be emphasized that various modifications and combinations of the above-described embodiments can be employed without departing from the spirit of the present invention, including without limitation using ITU channels in lieu of subchannels, using virtually any number of subchannels within or across ITU channels, using various different modulation schemes, altering the conditions (random, periodic, detection of intrusion, etc) under which particular schemes are employed, as well as employing different methods of communicating among network nodes which scheme (and associated algorithm) will be used at any given time.

Claims

1. A method of providing security at the physical layer of an optical network by processing client signals for transmission on a fiber optic cable of the optical network, the method comprising the following steps: (a) encoding one or more client signals;(b) buffering and synchronizing the encoded client signals;(c) mapping the buffered and synchronized client signals to one or more subchannels within a single ITU channel or across multiple ITU channels;(d) modulating the subchannels onto subcarrier frequencies;(e) multiplexing together the signals on the subcarrier frequencies within each ITU channel, and the resulting combined signals on the ITU channel frequencies, to generate an optical signal for transmission along the fiber optic cable of the optical network; and(f) modifying dynamically over time one or more of the processing steps (a)-(e).

2. A method of providing security at the physical layer of an optical network by processing an optical signal received on a fiber optic cable of the optical network, the method comprising the following steps: (a) demultiplexing the optical signal into distinct ITU channel frequencies and subcarrier frequencies representing subchannels within each ITU channel;(b) demodulating the demultiplexed signals into distinct subchannels;(c) demapping the demodulated signals into one or more subchannels within a single ITU channel or across multiple ITU channels;(d) buffering and synchronizing the demapped subchannels into distinct encoded client signals;(e) decoding the encoded client signals to recover the original client signals transmitted by an originating node on the optical network; and(f) modifying dynamically over time one or more of the processing steps (a)-(e) in accordance with an algorithm by which analogous steps were modified during transmission of the original client signals.

3. The method of claim 1, wherein one or more of the dynamic modifications are triggered randomly over time.

4. The method of claim 1, wherein one or more of the dynamic modifications are triggered periodically over time.

5. The method of claim 1, wherein one or more of the dynamic modifications are triggered based upon the occurrence of a predetermined condition.

6. The method of claim 5, wherein the predetermined condition is the detection of an intrusion into the optical network.

7. The method of claim 1, wherein the encoding of the client signals is modified dynamically by alternating between scrambling standards G.709 and G.975.

8. The method of claim 1, wherein the buffering and synchronizing of the encoded client signals is modified dynamically by changing the data rates of the encoded client signals.

9. The method of claim 1, wherein the mapping of the buffered and synchronized client signals is modified dynamically by changing the mapping of one or more client signals from a previously mapped ITU channel or subchannel to a different ITU channel or subchannel.

10. The method of claim 1, wherein the modulation of the subchannels is modified dynamically to introduce a lambda drift of the subcarriers within an ITU channel window by shifting the subchannels together to occupy a slightly different portion of the ITU channel window.

11. The method of claim 1, wherein the modulation of the subchannels is modified dynamically by changing the polarization state of the subcarrier frequencies within an ITU channel.

12. The method of claim 1, wherein the modulation of the subchannels is modified dynamically by changing the modulation scheme employed to generate one or more subchannels.